Electric double-layer capacitors (EDLC) store ionic charge electrostatically at the interface of high surface area electrodes such as carbon in a liquid electrolyte. Despite significant improvements in electrode and materials design, virtually all state-of-the-art nonaqueous electrochemical capacitors use the same electrolyte: tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate (TEABF4) in acetonitrile (ACN). This electrolyte has an exceptionally high conductivity which minimizes resistive losses and enables capacitors to operate at very high power. However, this electrolyte has a practical voltage window around only 2.7 V, beyond which the capacitor lifetime is significantly shortened. Since the energy stored in a capacitor increases quadratically with voltage, extending this electrochemical window could significantly improve the energy density. In this study we report on electrolytes consisting of LiPF6 or NaPF6 in tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (TEGDME or tetraglyme or G4), bis(2-methoxyethyl) ether (diglyme, or G2) and dimethoxyethane (DME or G1) which clearly show a 4 V electrochemical window. The extended voltage window doubles the energy density that can be achieved with any given capacitor electrode. Electrolyte conductivities range from 1-10 mS/cm, which are comparable to ionic liquids and adequate for moderate power applications. Futhermore, glyme-based electrolytes have good chemical stability and low flammability. Importantly, all salts and solvents are commercially available, which should enable these electrolytes to be as cost-effective and scalable as the current generation of commercial supercapacitor electrolytes. NMR experiments were performed on 0.1m LiPF6 and 0.1m/0.8m NaPF6, each dissolved in G1, G2, and G4. Using Pulsed Field Gradient (PFG) NMR, the solvent and ionic self-diffusion coefficients, D, of 1H, 7Li, 19F, and 23Na were measured, at both 25°C and 60°C. As NMR does not distinguish between the movement of single ions and ion pairs, it can be difficult to accurately determine the true conductivity of the material. However, the diffusion measurements were used to find the limiting conductivity, σNMR , of each material via the Nernst-Einstein equation: σNMR = F2[C]/(RT)*(Dcation+Danion) Direct comparison with conductivity values obtained by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements yields the degree of ion association, α: α = 1 - (σdirect/σNMR) Both diffusion and conductivity decrease with increasing solvent size, primarily attributed to viscosity effects. However the degree of ion association is significant, determined to be 85% for both 0.1m LiPF6 and 0.1m NaPF6 in G2. In glyme solvents, ion association tends to decrease with increasing solvent molecular mass, and increase with increasing temperature. These results will be discussed in the context of practical use of glyme-based electrolytes for electrochemical capacitors.
Read full abstract