22 December 2006 Dear Editor, BASIC PAEDIATRIC KNOWLEDGE: IS IT STILL RELEVANT? The ‘new morbidity’ is a well-established concept in current paediatric practice.1 Oberklaid has documented these changes in Australia and has pointed out that many paediatricians felt that they were poorly equipped after their training to deal with this new style of practice.2, 3 While not arguing that these changes have come about, but before any radical change is introduced into training, it is worth re-evaluating what clinical problems are encountered currently by paediatricians in smaller centres and assessing how important social and environmental factors are. A sequential series of referrals to the Paediatric Department of Wairau Hospital, Blenheim, New Zealand was evaluated prospectively. Data relating to 100 new referrals were collected. Information about the child's age, sex and the referring general practitioner or specialist’s diagnosis was collected initially. The outpatient nurse collected data on the family structure and size. After the first consultation a working diagnosis was formed and information recorded as to whether the diagnosis was primarily a physical disorder, a reflection on social dysfunction, an emotional problem or a developmental disorder. The primary ‘trigger’ for the consultation was ranked from the above categories accepting that all may have a degree of social and environmental factors involved. The study period was during late 2005 and early 2006. The same paediatrician saw all referrals. The 100 referred children had an average age of 5.4 years (SD ± 5.8, range: 11 days–15.8 years). There were 44 (44%) boys and 56 (56%) girls. Table 1 outlines the final diagnostic categories as each child had a specific diagnosis given following assessment. Urinary tract infection and its subsequent management were the single commonest referral diagnoses followed by disorders of bowel function. A physical disorder was the prime indication for referral in 92%, a behavioural issue in 4%, an emotional problem in 2% and a developmental problem in 2%. No referrals were as a result of family dysfunction only. This sample represents about 10% of the annual new patient referrals to a paediatrician working in a small rural area of New Zealand. It does not include emergency and acute admissions to the wards, neonatal consultation nor the large number of outpatients followed for chronic disorders. The diagnostic categories show a wide range of disorders seen and the need for knowledge over a wide field of paediatric medicine. There was a striking absence of factors that could be attributed to ‘environmental and social processes’,4 that is to say, the family structure, size and function or ethnic diversity and its contribution to ill health. It is accepted that this is a rural sample and does not reflect the needs of a large inner city multiethnic group. However, it does reflect much of the pattern seen in rural New Zealand. Family structures appear to reflect the changes reported throughout New Zealand. However, our data did not point to these changes being the major factor in the reason for the referral for the outpatient consultation or contributing to the child’s medical condition, in all but a small percentage of children. Indeed, it could be argued from our results that paediatricians working in rural or remote areas need a very wide experience and exposure to the physical disorders of childhood and not a narrow psychosocial perspective. Further, Oberklaid has stressed the need for those going into general paediatric practice do need to maintain skills at both ends of the clinical spectrum.3 Our results support this view but indicate further that basic physical and developmental problems predominate still in everyday practice and training should still reflect these -predominantly.