Adverse Neonatal Outcomes Research Articles

Factors Affecting Sleep Quality and Prenatal Distress Among Rural and Urban Women During Early Pregnancy.

Background Early pregnancy is characterized by the initiation of physiological and psychological changes, which places pregnant women at risk of psychological distress and poor sleep, which is known to cause adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of prenatal distress and sleep quality during early pregnancy and identify factors associated with prenatal distress among pregnant women from urban and rural settings. Methods The study was conducted with 325 pregnant women (175 rural, 150 urban) as a baseline assessment of theMAI (Mother and Infant) cohort, a longitudinal observational study in Pune, India. Data on sociodemography, anthropometry, clinical history, prenatal distress, and sleep quality were collected between August 2020 and March 2023. Mann Whitney U test and regression were used to assess correlates of sleep quality and prenatal distress. Results Over one-third (37.5%) (n=122) of women experienced prenatal distress. Women from rural areas reported a higher prevalence (40%) (n=70) of distress, and poorer sleep quality than urban women (51.4% (n=90) vs 38.7% (n=58)). High prenatal distress was moderately associated with poor sleep quality (ρ = 0.308, p = 0.001). After controlling for sociodemographic and clinical factors, high prenatal distress (B=2.63, 95% CI: 1.47-4.69) predicted poor sleep quality. Rural residence (OR: 6.37, 2.46-16.51), underweight BMI status (OR: 2.21, 0.97-5.05), presence of episodes of vomiting (OR: 1.70, 0.93-3.13), and poor sleep quality (OR: 0.74, 0.40-1.38) significantly (p<0.05) contributed to prenatal distress. Conclusion Prenatal distress and poor sleep quality are significant concerns for pregnant mothers globally and require early screening and management strategies to avoid adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.

Severe adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the planned birth setting being midwife-led birth centers or obstetric-led units.

The establishment of midwife-led birth centers (MLBCs) is still being debated. The study aimed to compare severe adverse outcomes and mode of birth in low-risk women according to their birth planned in MLBCs or in obstetric-led units (OUs) in France. We used nationwide databases to select low-risk women at the start of care in labor in MLBCs (n = 1294) and in OUs (n = 5985). Using multilevel logistic regression, we compared severe adverse maternal and neonatal morbidity as a composite outcome and as individual outcomes. These include severe postpartum hemorrhage (≥1000 mL of blood loss), obstetrical anal sphincter injury, maternal admission to an intensive care unit, maternal death, a 5-minute Apgar score <7, neonatal resuscitation at birth, neonatal admission to an intensive care unit, and stillbirth or neonatal death. We also studied the mode of birth and the role of prophylactic administration of oxytocin at birth in the association between birth settings and severe postpartum hemorrhage. Severe adverse maternal and neonatal outcome indicated a slightly higher rate in women in MLBCs compared to OUs according to unadjusted analyses (4.6% in MLBCs vs. 3.4% in OUs; cOR 1.36; 95%CI [1.01-1.83]), but the difference was not significant between birth settings after adjustment (aOR 1.37 [0.92-2.05]). Severe neonatal morbidity alone was not different (1.7% vs. 1.6%; aOR 1.17 [0.55-2.47]). However, severe maternal morbidity was significantly higher in MLBCs than in OUs (3.0% vs. 1.9%; aOR 1.61 [1.09-2.39]), mainly explained by higher risks of severe postpartum hemorrhage (2.4 vs. 1.1%; aOR 2.37 [1.29-4.36]), with 2 out of 5 in MLBCs partly explained by the low use of prophylactic oxytocin. Cesarean and operative vaginal births were significantly decreased in women with a birth planned in MLBCs. In France, 3 to 4% of low-risk women experienced a severe adverse maternal or neonatal outcome regardless of the planned birth setting. Results were favorable for MLBCs in terms of mode of birth but not for severe postpartum hemorrhage, which could be partly addressed by revising practices of prophylactic administration of oxytocin.

Comparison of Ultrasound Findings Associated with Adverse Fetal, Obstetric, and Neonatal Outcomes in Pregestational Type 1 And Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.

We aimed to summarize the available evidence examining the association between prenatal ultrasound findings and adverse fetal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and to evaluate whether the predictive value of ultrasound findings for adverse outcomes varies between T1DM and T2DM pregnancies. We conducted a systematic review of the existing literature through August 12, 2024. We included articles in English that reported associations between ultrasound findings and fetal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes in pregnant people with T1DM and T2DM. Two independent reviewers examined articles at the abstract level and, if eligible, at the full-text level; disagreements were adjudicated by a third reviewer. Of the 2,088 unique citations reviewed, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria describing associations between ultrasound findings and fetal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes among a total of 1,165 pregnant people with T1DM and 489 pregnant people with T2DM. Most studies (10/12) examined the association between ultrasound measures of growth, including estimated fetal weight (EFW) and its individual components, abdominal wall thickness, head circumference to abdominal circumference (HC/AC) ratio, and birthweight, large for gestational age (LGA) or small for gestational age (SGA). Studies did not examine stillbirth, neonatal demise, or maternal outcomes other than cesarean section. This systematic review synthesizes the available literature on ultrasound risk markers of adverse fetal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes separately in pregnant people with T1DM and T2DM. We identified very few studies that distinguished between pregnant people with T1DM and T2DM, and the majority focused on surrogate outcomes (e.g., LGA, SGA) of morbidity. Our findings highlight the need for further studies investigating these distinct diseases to provide evidence for antenatal management recommendations.

Exposure to acute ambient temperature extremes and neonatal intensive care unit admissions: A case-crossover study

BackgroundExtreme in utero temperatures have been associated with adverse birth outcomes, including preterm birth and low birthweight. However, there is limited evidence on associations with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, which reflect a range of poor neonatal health outcomes. MethodsThis case-crossover study assesses the associations between ambient temperature changes during the week of delivery and risk of NICU admission. Data from the Consortium on Safe Labor (2002–2008) were linked to ambient temperature at hospital referral regions. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) estimated NICU admission risk with a 1 °C increase on each day of the week of delivery and of the average weekly temperature, adjusted for particulate matter ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5) and relative humidity. We also estimated associations with 1 °C increases and 1 °C decreases in temperatures during weeks of site-specific extreme heat (>90th and 95th percentiles) and cold (<5th and 10th percentiles), respectively. ResultsThere were 27,188 NICU admissions with median (25th, 75th) temperature of 16.4 °C (5.8, 23.0) during the week before delivery. A 1 °C increase in temperature during the week of delivery was not associated with risk of NICU admission. However, analyses of extreme temperatures found that a 1 °C decrease in weekly average temperatures below the 10th and 5th percentiles was associated with 30 % (aHR = 1.30, 95 % CI 1.28, 1.31) and 47 % (aHR = 1.47, 95 % CI 1.45, 1.50) increased risk of NICU admissions, while a 1 °C increase in weekly average temperatures above the 90th and 95th percentiles was associated with more than two- (aHR = 2.29, 95 % CI 2.17, 2.42) and four-fold (aHR = 4.30, 95 % CI 3.68, 5.03) higher risk of NICU admission, respectively. ConclusionsOur study found temperature extremes in the week before delivery increased NICU admission risk, particularly during extreme heat, which may translate to more adverse neonatal outcomes as extreme temperatures persist.

Association between late pregnancy prehypertension and adverse outcomes among newborns of women delivered at a tertiary hospital in Eastern Uganda: a prospective cohort study

BackgroundPrehypertension during pregnancy is currently not considered as a high-risk pregnancy state in existing guidelines despite recent research correlating it with higher rates of morbidity and mortality in both the mother and the fetus. Studies on prehypertension have not been conducted in Africa despite high rates of poor neonatal outcomes.AimsThe study aimed to determine the association between late pregnancy prehypertension and adverse outcomes in newborns of women with late pregnancy prehypertension at Jinja Regional Referral Hospital.Methods and materialsBetween September 2022 and January 2023, a hospital-based prospective cohort study including 300 pregnant women was conducted. Participants were divided according to third-trimester blood pressure, as determined by the JNC-8 criteria. Following hospital admission for labor and delivery, 150 normotensive women and 150 prehypertensive women were identified and followed until delivery, and their neonates were followed until death or hospital discharge. A p value of ≤ 0.05 was the threshold for statistical significance when comparing the groups using the relative risk, X2, and Mantel-Haenszel adjustment.ResultsComposite adverse neonatal outcomes were more common in prehypertensive women compared to normotensive women (48.67% versus 32.67%), particularly Small-for-Gestation Age (SGA), stillbirth, and composite adverse neonatal outcomes had significantly higher likelihood, with aRRs of 1.63 (95% CI 1.10–2.42, p = 0.037), 9.0 (95% CI 1.15–70.16, p = 0.010), and 1.55 (95% CI 1.16–2.08, p < 0.001), respectively. By a linear model, birthweight decreased by 45.1 g for every 10 mmHg rise in systolic blood pressure (p = 0.041, Pearson correlation of -0.118).Conclusion and recommendationsPrehypertension in late pregnancy increased risks for adverse neonatal outcomes, thus a need to potentially lower pregnancy hypertension cut-off levels possibly through adopting the ACC/AHA blood pressure definitions for pregnant women.

Transperineal sonographic assessment of the angle of progression before the onset of labour: how well does it predict the mode of delivery in late-term pregnancy.

Predicting the success of vaginal delivery is an important issue in preventing adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study sought to examine whether measurement of the angle of progression (AoP) can predict asuccessful vaginal delivery following induction of labour (IoL) among late term nulliparous women with a low (4>) Bishop score. This prospective study included consecutive nulliparous pregnant women whose gestational age was 41weeks and 1-6days (late-term). The AoP was measured atleast three times and their means were calculated. During the study period, data of 150 women wereincluded in the final analysis. Thirty-eight women underwent CS due to failure to progress (n=30) or NRGHR (n=8), while the remaining 112 women underwent NVD, with four women requiring vacuum extraction. The two groups were similar with respect to age, gestational age, BMI, estimated foetal weight, and birth weight. Women undergoing NVD differed significantly from those undergoing CS with respect to a greater ultrasonographic AoP (113.8±11.9° vs. 98.1±10.9°, p=0.0001), a shorter duration of dinoprostone use, shorter time to labour contraction, and a shorter duration oflabour. In ROC analysis, the cut-off value for AoP was 100° for the prediction of successful IoL for NVD, with a sensitivity of 96 % and a specificity of 63 %. AoP may be a useful sonographic parameter for predicting successful vaginal delivery among nulliparous women at late term undergoing IoL; an AOP wider than 100°is associated with a high rate of vaginal delivery.

SARS-CoV-2 replicates in the placenta after maternal infection during pregnancy.

Pregnant women are at increased risk for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and adverse neonatal outcome, primarily preterm birth and stillbirth. Our study aimed to investigate to which extent SARS-CoV-2 affects placental tissue and if viral replication within the placenta is evident, thus if there is a correlation between placental damage and adverse pregnancy outcome such as stillbirth. We prospectively collected placentas from 61 SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women and 10 controls. Histopathological, immunohistochemical, and in situ hybridization studies were performed on all placentas with antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 proteins, ACE2, various immune cells, and inflammatory markers or probes for SARS-CoV-2 genes and an antisense strand. The measured scores of SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein, nucleocapsid, and antisense strand indicating replication correlated with both the severity of maternal symptoms and presence of stillbirth. Specifically, 15/61 placentas exhibited replication, while the three cases with stillbirth had high or maximal replication scores. ACE2-H-score was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients, while the expression of various immune cells did not differ statistically. In multivariate analysis, presence of maternal comorbidities correlated with presence of severe COVID-19 infection. We report evidence of active in vivo SARS-CoV-2 replication in the placenta after maternal infection in pregnancy in a case-control setting in a large population. Intensity of placental viral replication as well as viral levels were higher in women with severe or critical COVID-19 disease, supporting the rationale that severity of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection could correlate with the severity of placentitis. Replication was maximal in cases of stillbirth, which suggests direct placental involvement in the pathophysiology of this dramatic outcome. Continuing to advocate for preventive measures against COVID-19 during pregnancy, including (re)vaccination, as well as appropriately counseling women with diagnosed infection, are of utter importance.

Epidural Analgesia During Labor and Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy

Epidural analgesia is used by approximately 70% of birthing persons in the US to alleviate labor pain and is a common cause of elevated temperature in the birthing parent during labor, which, in turn, is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes such as hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). To determine whether epidural analgesia is associated with increased risk of HIE after adjusting for the birthing person's maximal temperature before epidural placement and for the propensity to get an epidural. This retrospective, population-based cohort study was conducted at 15 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals. Participants included singleton neonates born at 35 weeks' or later gestational age between 2012 and 2019. Elective cesarean deliveries and deliveries within 2 hours of hospital admission were excluded. Data analysis was performed from November 2022 to June 2024. The primary exposure was epidural analgesia during labor. The primary outcome was HIE, defined as the presence of both neonatal acidosis (ie, pH <7 or base deficit ≥10) and encephalopathy. The presence and timing of epidural analgesia and demographic, pregnancy, and labor characteristics were extracted from electronic medical records. A propensity score for receiving epidural analgesia was created including demographic variables and comorbidities predating epidural placement. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between epidural analgesia and HIE, adjusting for maximal birthing parent's temperature before epidural placement and the propensity for receiving an epidural. Among 233 056 infants born at 35 weeks' or later gestational age by vaginal or unplanned cesarean delivery after at least 2 hours of in-hospital labor, 177 603 (76%) were exposed to epidural analgesia and 439 (0.19%) had HIE. On unadjusted analysis, epidural analgesia was associated with an increased risk of maximal temperature greater than 38 °C during labor (risk ratio [RR], 8.58; 95% CI, 8.06-9.14). Each degree increase in maximal temperature during labor was associated with nearly triple the odds of HIE (odds ratio [OR], 2.82; 95% CI, 2.51-3.17). However, there was no significant association between epidural analgesia and the risk of HIE either on crude (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.96-1.53) or adjusted (adjusted OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73-1.17) analyses. In this cohort study including more than 230 000 parent-infant dyads, epidural analgesia was associated with increased maximal temperature during labor, a known risk factor for HIE. However, epidural analgesia was not associated with increased odds of HIE.

Adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes associated with maternal schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and prenatal antipsychotic use: a meta-analysis of 37,214,330 pregnancy deliveries and propensity-score weighted population-based cohort study assessing confounder dependency of risk estimates.

Studies demonstrated increased obstetric and neonatal complications in women with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (SSD), but most inadequately addressed confounders and rarely considered antipsychotic effects. We conducted a meta-analysis and a population-based cohort study evaluating associations of adverse obstetric/neonatal outcomes with SSD and prenatal antipsychotic use. In the meta-analysis, we searched four databases from inception to October-31-2023 and generated pooled risk estimates using random-effect models. In the cohort study, we identified women aged 15-50 years with SSD-diagnosis from electronic-heath-record database of public healthcare-services who delivered first/singleton children between 2003 and 2018 in Hong Kong. Propensity-score weighted regression-analyses incorporating important confounders including maternal pre-existing and gestational morbidities, substance/alcohol abuse, and psychotropic use, were performed to assess risk of adverse obstetric/neonatal outcomes in SSD-women versus non-SSD-women, and subsequently treated-SSD and untreated-SSD subgroups to disentangle effects of SSD from antipsychotic exposure. The meta-analysis (studies = 18, women = 37,214,330, including 42,926 SSD-women) found significant associations of SSD with 12 of 17 analyzed negative obstetric/neonatal outcomes (with pooled relative risk ranged:1.12-2.10), including placental complications, induced labor, Caesarean delivery, fetal distress, stillbirth, preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age, low birth weight, low APGAR scores, neonatal and post-neonatal deaths. However, the cohort study (466,358 women, including 804 SSD-women) revealed that elevated risk of most study outcomes in unadjusted-models were markedly-attenuated or became non-significant in propensity-score weighted adjusted-models, except index-delivery hospitalization ≥7 days (odds ratio [OR] = 1.76 [95% CI = 1.33-2.34]), preterm birth (OR = 1.48 [95% CI = 1.09-2.00]) and neonatal special-care admission (OR = 1.65 [95% CI = 1.35-2.01]). Apart from higher neonatal special-care admission in treated-SSD than untreated-SSD women (OR = 1.75 [95% CI = 1.23-2.52]), no significant between-group differences emerged in other outcomes. In sum, elevated risk of most obstetric/neonatal complications reported in SSD-women might largely be explained by maternal physical comorbidities, substance/alcohol use disorders and other confounders. Interventions targeting modifiable maternal risk factors should be incorporated in prenatal care for SSD-women to minimize avoidable adverse outcomes.

Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4) as a Potential Biomarker for Fetal Growth Restriction: Insights from an Umbilical Cord Blood Analysis.

This study aimed to evaluate the umbilical cord blood chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4) concentrations in pregnancies complicated with fetal growth restriction (FGR) and aimed to investigate the rela-tionship between the CSPG4 levels in these pregnancies and adverse neonatal outcomes. This prospective case-control study was conducted between August 2023 and January 2024. The study included 80 singleton pregnancies at 35 to 39 weeks of gestation. Among these, 40 were diagnosed with FGR and 40 served as the control group. After the delivery, samples of the cord blood were collected prior to the placental delivery. The CSPG4 levels were significantly higher in the study group (FGR), 1,153 (1,059 - 1,261) pg/mL, than in the control group, 1,107 (873 - 1,197) pg/mL (p = 0.024). When all patients were evaluated, the CSPG4 levels showed a positive correlation with the systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio of the umbilical arteries (r = 0.276, p = 0.013). A statistically significant negative correlation was observed between the levels of CSPG4 in the umbilical cord blood and the Apgar scores at the 1st (r = -0.256, p = 0.022) and 5th (r = -0.250, p = 0.026) minutes. The discriminatory power of the umbilical cord CSPG4 level in the determination of composite adverse neonatal outcomes was evaluated by ROC analysis and a cutoff point of > 1,091.25 pg/mL, showing a sensitivity of 93.3%, a specificity of 46.2%, and an AUC of 0.661 (95% CI: 0.547 - 0.763, p = 0.019). Elevated levels of CSPG4 have been observed in the umbilical cord blood in pregnancies complicated by FGR; higher levels are associated with adverse neonatal outcomes.

Decision and economic evaluation of abortion availability in the United States military

BackgroundActive-duty service women rely on the civilian sector for most abortion care due to limits on federal funding for abortion. Abortion is now banned in many states with large military presences. The Department of Defense has implemented policies to assist active-duty service women in accessing abortion, but there is debate to reverse this support. ObjectiveOur goal was to compare the cost-effectiveness and incidence of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes of a hypothetical cohort of active-duty service women living in abortion-restricted states comparing restricted abortion access (abortion not available cohort) to abortion available with Department of Defense travel support (abortion available cohort). Study DesignWe developed a decision tree model to compare abortion not available and abortion available cohorts for active-duty service women living in abortion-restricted states. Our cohorts were subdivided into normal pregnancies and those with a major fetal anomaly. Cost estimates, probabilities, and disability weights of various health conditions associated with abortion and pregnancy were obtained and derived from the literature. Effectiveness was expressed in disability-adjusted life years and the willingness to pay threshold was set to $100,000 per disability-adjusted life year gained or averted. We completed probabilistic sensitivity analyses with 10,000 simulations to test the robustness of our results. Secondary outcomes included numbers of stillbirths, neonatal deaths, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, maternal deaths, severe maternal morbidities, and first and second trimester abortions. ResultsThe abortion not available cohort had a higher annual cost to the military ($299.1 million, 95% CI 239.2 – 386.6, vs. $226.0 million, 95% CI 181.9 – 288.5) and was associated with 203 more disability-adjusted life years compared to the abortion available cohort. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was dominant for abortion available. Abortion not available resulted in an annual additional 7 stillbirths, 1 neonatal death, 112 neonatal intensive care unit admissions, 0.016 maternal deaths, 24 severe maternal morbidities, 27 less second trimester abortions, and 602 less first trimester abortions. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the chance of the abortion available cohort being the more cost-effective strategy was greater than 95%. ConclusionLimiting active-duty service women’s access to abortion care increases costs to the military, even with costs of travel support, and increases adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. This analysis provides important information for policymakers about economic and health burdens associated with barriers to abortion care in the military.

Assessing the Role of Fetal Doppler in High-Risk Obstetrics: Evidence From a Comprehensive Study.

Background Colour Doppler ultrasound is pivotal in modern obstetrics for evaluating maternal and fetal health, especially in high-risk pregnancies. It enhances fetal oxygenation and nutrient delivery assessment, aiding in the early detection of adverse outcomes. However, its effectiveness is influenced by operator skill and the potential for interpretative variability. Aim This study aims to assess the utility of Doppler ultrasound in evaluating fetal status in high-risk pregnancies at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, India. Materials and methods A hospital-based observational study was conducted from September 2022 to July 2024, including 145 high-risk pregnant women, of whom 120 delivered at the institute. The study included thorough maternal and fetal assessments, with regular Doppler studies starting at 28 weeks of gestation. The frequency of these studies was adjusted according to the changes and severity observed in the indices. Detailed documentation of both maternal and neonatal outcomes was meticulously maintained. Statistical analyses were performed using MS Excel (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and RStudio,Version 2023.08.0-daily+170 (RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA, USA), with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. Results The majority of participants were aged 21-30 years, with multigravida constituting 63.33%. Pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and preeclampsia were the most common high-risk factors (28.33%). Abnormal umbilical artery (UA) flow patterns were observed in 58.33% of cases. Abnormal UA and middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler indices correlated significantly with adverse outcomes. Most deliveries were via caesarean section (82.5%), and 63.33% of neonates required Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission. Neonates with abnormal antenatal Doppler studies had significantly lower APGAR (appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration) scores and higher NICU admission rates. Discussion The study highlights the critical role of Doppler ultrasound in managing high-risk pregnancies, providing essential data for early interventions. Consistent with other studies, abnormal Doppler patterns were significantly associated with adverse neonatal outcomes, necessitating timely caesarean deliveries. Conclusion Fetal Doppler ultrasonography is essential for managing high-risk pregnancies, enabling timely therapeutic interventions and improving perinatal outcomes. Despite its limitations, Doppler technology remains invaluable in identifying at-risk foetuses and guiding clinical decisions for optimal pregnancy management.

Does decreased fetal growth estimation in the appropriate for gestational age range affect delivery outcomes?

To study the effect of decreased estimated fetal weight (EFW) percentiles in appropriate for gestational age fetuses. This retrospective cohort study included women who had second and third trimester ultrasound examinations. Delivery and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with decreased EFW of ≥ 30 percentiles in EFW between ultrasound examinations (decreased growth group) and those without such a decrease (control group) were compared. Deliveries with EFW or birthweight below the 10th percentile were excluded. Among 1610 deliveries, 57 were in the decreased growth group and 1553 in the control group. Maternal characteristics did not differ between the groups except for higher rate of nulliparity in the decreased growth group. We found similar rates of Category II/III monitoring, cesarean deliveries due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate and adverse neonatal outcomes. Neonatal birthweight was lower in the decreased growth group as compared to controls. This study did not find association between the group of appropriate for gestational age fetuses with decreased growth, with adverse outcomes.

Umbilical arterial blood lactate as predictor of early neonatal outcome and evaluation of intrapartum asphyxia

BackgroundPerinatal asphyxia is a leading cause of under-5 mortality and exerts great pressure on the health system. Adequate foetal monitoring in labour is paramount in the early detection of foetal distress to prevent perinatal asphyxia. Several methods of foetal monitoring are in use with varying efficacy. This study investigated the efficacy of umbilical arterial (UA) lactate assay in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes. MethodologyThis was a prospective longitudinal study involving 160 pregnant women in the active phase of labour at term who met the inclusion criteria. They were recruited using a consecutive sampling technique and underwent a cardiotocography. Then they were classified into normal and abnormal cardiotocographic groups. At delivery, the UA blood of all of the babies was collected and assayed for serum lactate, and the levels were correlated with the perinatal outcome. The perinatal outcomes were measured by Apgar scores, admission into the neonatal unit, and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. Analysis was done to determine the sensitivity and specificity of UA lactate in predicting birth asphyxia, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, and neonatal unit admission. ResultsThe mean age ± standard deviation (SD) between the two cardiotocography (CTG) groups, normal years (30.55 ± 5.59) and abnormal years (29.86 ± 5.51), were similar. A critical UA lactate concentration > 9.1 mmol/L predicted Apgar scores < 7 at 5 min with a sensitivity and specificity of 76.47% (CI: 50.1–93.2) and 91.55% (CI: 85.7–95.6%), respectively. Also, the need for neonatal unit admission was predicted at a cut-off point >9.1 mmol/L with a sensitivity of 61.90% (CI: 38.4–81.9) and specificity of 91.30% (CI: 85.3–95.4). Umbilical artery lactate levels > 11.2 mmol/L predicted the development of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in neonates with a sensitivity of 100% (CI: 39.8–100.0) and specificity of 88.39% (CI: 82.3–93.0). ConclusionUmbilical artery lactate correlates with adverse pregnancy outcomes and is an excellent tool for predicting adverse neonatal outcome.

Optimal treatment for women with acute hypertension in pregnancy; a randomized trial comparing intravenous labetalol versus nicardipine

ObjectivesBlood pressure control in severe hypertension of pregnancy is crucial for mother and neonate. In absence of evidence, guidelines recommend either intravenous labetalol or nicardipine. We compared the effectiveness and safety of these two drugs in women with severe hypertension in pregnancy. Study designWe performed an open label randomized controlled trial. Women with a singleton pregnancy complicated by severe hypertension (systolic ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥ 110 mmHg) requiring intravenous antihypertensive treatment were randomized to intravenous labetalol or intravenous nicardipine. The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome defined as severe Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), Broncho Pulmonary Dysplasia (BPD), Intraventricular Hemorrhage (IVH) IIB or worse, Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC), or perinatal death defined as fetal death or neonatal death before discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).Based on a power analysis, we estimated that 472 women (236 per group) needed to be included to detect a difference of 15% in the primary outcome with 90% power. The study was halted prematurely at 30 inclusions because of slow recruitment and trial fatigue. ResultsBetween August 2018 and April 2022, we randomized 30 women of which 16 were allocated to intravenous nicardipine and 14 to intravenous labetalol. The composite adverse neonatal outcome was not significantly different between the two groups (25 % versus 43 % OR 0.28 (95 % CI 0.05–1.43), p = 0.12)). Respiratory distress syndrome occurred more often in the labetalol group than in the nicardipine group (42.9 % versus 12.5 %). Neonatal hypoglycemia occurred more often in the nicardipine group than in the labetalol group (31 % versus 7 %). Time until blood pressure control was faster in women treated with nicardipine than in women treated with labetalol (45 (15–150 min vs. 120 (60–127,5) min). ConclusionIn our prematurely halted small RCT, we were unable to provide evidence for the optimal choice of treatment for severe hypertension to improve neonatal outcome and/or to obtain faster blood pressure control. Differences in Respiratory distress syndrome and neonatal hypoglycemia between the groups might be the result of coincidental finding due to the small groups included in the study. A larger randomized trial would be needed to determine the safest and most efficacious (intravenous) therapy for severe hypertension in pregnancy. This study emphasizes the challenges of conducting a RCT for the optimal treatment for these women.

Impact of maternal body mass index on delivery complications and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)

Maternal Body Mass Index (BMI) is a crucial predictor of obstetric and delivery-related complications, significantly affecting maternal and neonatal outcomes. As global obesity rates continue to rise, the impact of elevated maternal BMI on pregnancy has garnered increasing attention. This comprehensive review examines the association between maternal BMI and various pregnancy complications, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), hypertensive disorders, labor dystocia, cesarean section (C-section), postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and adverse neonatal outcomes such as macrosomia. The aim of this review is to examine the impact of maternal Body Mass Index (BMI) on pregnancy and delivery outcomes, with a focus on identifying key complications associated with elevated maternal BMI and exploring the underlying mechanisms. As global obesity rates continue to rise, understanding the influence of maternal BMI on obstetric and neonatal outcomes is crucial for developing effective management strategies. This review synthesizes current research on the relationship between maternal BMI and complications such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), hypertensive disorders, labor dystocia, cesarean section (C-section), postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and adverse neonatal outcomes, including macrosomia. The review also delves into the physiological mechanisms, including insulin resistance, chronic inflammation, and altered uterine contractility, that contribute to these complications. Clinical implications are discussed, emphasizing the importance of preconception counselling, individualized weight management during pregnancy, and interdisciplinary care to optimize outcomes. The conclusion highlights Maternal BMI is a critical factor influencing pregnancy outcomes. Obesity increases the risk of delivery complications and RPL, while underweight status is associated with preterm birth, LBW, and RPL. Addressing maternal BMI through preconception care and continuous monitoring during pregnancy is essential for improving maternal and fetal health outcomes.

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by placental abruption with vs. without supporting sonographic findings- A retrospective cohort study

Placental abruption (PA) is a major obstetric complication associated with worse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Though ultrasound findings may support the diagnosis of PA, the association of such findings to the severity of PA and maternal and neonatal outcomes is not yet clear. We aimed to assess the maternal and neonatal outcomes of PA cases with vs. without related sonographic findings. In this retrospective cohort study, all deliveries complicated by PA between 2009 and 2022 were included. Placental histopathology, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes were compared between cases of PA with vs. without supporting sonographic findings. A composite of severe neonatal morbidity was compared between the groups, including ≥1 of the following: seizures, intraventricular hemorrhage, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, periventricular leukomalacia, respiratory-distress syndrome, sepsis, anemia, blood transfusion or death. Of the 420 cases with PA eligible for the study, 50 patients (12%) were in the PA with sonographic features group and 370 (88%) were in the PA without sonographic features group. The PA with sonographic features group was characterized by significantly higher rates of prematurity (p<0.001), severe composite adverse neonatal outcome (p<0.01), and a composite maternal vascular malperfusion lesions in placental histopathology (p=0.001) In multivariable regression analyses, preterm birth was independently associated with the presence of sonographic features (aOR=8.79, 95% CI 2.41-31.93, p<0.001). PA with supporting sonographic features is associated with higher rates of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes and placental lesions. These findings emphasize the importance of sonographic evaluation for every case of PA before deciding upon management.

A prospective cohort study of pregnancy outcomes following antepartum infection with SARS-CoV-2

ObjectivesOur study aimed to explore the impact of COVID-19 infection on pregnancy outcomes, accounting for the progression of variants, vaccines, and treatment modalities. Study DesignWe performed a prospective longitudinal cohort study at two urban tertiary centers enrolling patients with a confirmed intrauterine singleton pregnancy from December 23, 2020 to July 18, 2022. Patients were evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 infection at enrollment and every trimester using serum antibody testing. The primary outcome was preterm birth. Symptom and treatment data were collected from pregnant patients with COVID-19 infections. Variant strain infection status was determined from local wastewater analysis. Results448 patients were enrolled, and 390 patients were retained through delivery with 159 unexposed and 231 exposed patients, of whom 56 patients (26.0 %) crossed over after enrollment to the exposed cohorts during pregnancy. There was no difference in rates of preterm birth between exposed and unexposed cohorts (14.6 % vs 11.3 %), in deliveries < 34 weeks (1.5 % vs 2.7 %), PPROM, (0.4 % vs 1.3 %), or gestational age at delivery (38.1 vs 38.2). Exposed patients were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with a hypertensive disorder (aOR 2.3, 95 % CI 1.2–4.1), specifically gestational hypertension (aOR 2.8, 95 % CI 1.3––6.0), but not preeclampsia/eclampsia. There were no differences in individual or composite neonatal outcomes. ConclusionsOur study contributed to the understanding of the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy outcomes, with increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy but overall, no differences in adverse neonatal outcomes. Regular antenatal PCR and antibody screening allowed for higher detection and inclusion of patients with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and effects on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Adverse pregnancy outcomes and effect of treatment in Wilson disease during pregnancy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wilson disease (WD) is a rare disorder of copper metabolism, leading to liver and neurological disease. Existing literature on WD in pregnancy is scarce, limiting preconception and obstetrical counselling. In this systematic review with meta-analysis, we determine the prevalence of various adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in WD, as well as evaluate the impact of WD treatment on these outcomes. Scopus, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched until 12 May 2023, for studies of pregnant individuals with WD and at least one pregnancy or neonatal outcome of interest. Meta-analysis of single proportions was conducted to pool prevalence data for each outcome. Outcome rates were compared between treated and untreated groups in a meta-analysis of dichotomous events. Sixteen studies, published from 1975 to 2022, were included in the systematic review. Thirty-seven percent of pregnancies reported at least one adverse pregnancy outcome. Spontaneous abortions (20%), liver diseases of pregnancy (4.5%) and preterm births (2%) were the most frequent adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with WD. The prevalence of spontaneous abortions was significantly lower in pregnant individuals with WD who received treatment during pregnancy (OR: .47, 95% CI: 35%-63%). The prevalence of any adverse pregnancy outcome was also significantly lower with treatment (OR: .53, 95% CI: .37-.76), which appears to be mostly driven by the reduction of spontaneous abortions. There is low to moderate quality evidence to suggest that preconception and obstetrical counselling for patients with WD should include a discussion on the potentially high frequency of adverse pregnancy outcomes in this population, as well as the importance of continuing WD treatment during pregnancy to ensure satisfactory pregnancy course and potentially minimize the risk of spontaneous abortions.

Gestational weight gain trajectories in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study.

Aims/Background Gestational diabetes mellitus is a common pregnancy complication that affects approximately 14% of pregnancies worldwide and can lead to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the trajectories of gestational weight gain among gestational diabetes mellitus patients and to inform the development of effective weight management strategies. Methods Demographic and antenatal examination data from 1421 pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus were retrospectively analysed. Quantitative data comparisons were performed using Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, t-tests, and one-way analysis of variance. Group-based trajectory modelling was employed to identify the trajectories of gestational weight gain among patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Results This study revealed that pre-pregnancy body mass index and types of gestational diabetes mellitus significantly influence gestational weight gain (p < 0.05). Group-based trajectory modelling identified three distinct gestational weight gain trajectories. Patients with gestational diabetes mellitus demonstrated a continuous weight gain throughout pregnancy, while women who were overweight or obese before pregnancy were more likely to follow a low-speed growth trajectory. Women in the rapid growth trajectory group were more inclined to deliver by caesarean section and were more likely to give birth to macrosomic infants. Conclusion Our research underscores the importance of identifying and distinguishing between different gestational weight gain trajectories in pregnant women, thereby identifying high-risk groups, which is crucial for improving the health conditions of both mothers and newborns.