Neoadjuvant Treatment Research Articles

Esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiation in esophageal cancer: a safe therapeutic strategy.

The standard treatment regimen for esophageal cancer is chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy. However, the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy damages the surrounding tissue, which potentially increases the risk of postoperative complications, including anastomotic leakage. The impact of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT, 50.4Gy radiotherapy) compared to the standard neoadjuvant scheme (nCRT, 41.4Gy radiotherapy) prior to surgery on the incidence of anastomotic leakage remains poorly understood. To study this, all patients who received dCRT between 2011 and 2021 followed by esophagectomy were included. For each patient, two patients who received nCRT were selected as matched controls. Outcomes included postoperative anastomotic leakage, pulmonary and other complications, anastomotic stenosis, pulmonary and other postoperative complications (Clavien Dindo Classification ≥1), and overall survival. One hundred and eight patients were included with a median follow-up of 28months. The time between neoadjuvant treatment and surgery was longer in the dCRT group compared to the nCRT group (65 vs. 48days, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, significantly more patients in the dCRT group suffered from anastomotic leakage (11% vs. 1%, P = 0.04) and anastomotic stenosis (42% vs. 17%, P < 0.01). No differences were found for other complications or overall survival between both groups. In conclusion, preoperative dCRT is associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leakage and stenosis. These complications, however, can be treated effectively. Therefore, esophagectomy after dCRT is considered to be an appropriate treatment strategy in a selected patient group.

Optimal Treatment Strategies for cT2 Staged Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and the Gastroesophageal Junction: A Multinational, High-volume Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

A multi-national high-volume center study was undertaken to evaluate outcomes after primary surgery (PS) or neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery (NAT/S) in cT2 staged adenocarcinomas of the esophagus (EAC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Optimal treatment approach with either NAT/S or PS for clinically staged cT2cNany or cT2N0 EAC and GEJ remains unknown due to the lack of randomized controlled trials. Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained databases from ten centers was performed. Between 01/2012-08/2023 645 patients who fulfilled inclusion criteria of GEJ Siewert type I, II or EAC with cT2 status at diagnosis underwent PS or NAT/S with curative intent. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). In the cT2cNany cohort 192 patients (29.8%) underwent PS and 453 (70.2%) underwent NAT/S. In all cT2cN0 patients (n=333), NAT/s remained the more frequent treatment (56.2%). Patients undergoing PS were in both cT2 cohorts older (P<0.001) and had a higher ASA classification (P<0.05). R0 resection showed no differences between NAT/S and PS in both cT2 cohorts (P>0.4).Median OS was 51.0 months in the PS group (95% CI 31.6-70.4) versus 114.0 months (95% CI 53.9-174.1) in the NAT/S group (P=0.003) of cT2cNany patients. For cT2cN0 patients NAT/S was associated with longer OS (P=0.002) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.001). After propensity score matching of cT2N0 patients, survival benefit for NAT/S remained (P=0.004). Histopathology showed that 38.1% of cT2cNany and 34.2% of cT2cN0 patients were understaged. Due to unreliable identification of cT2N0 disease, all patients should be offered a multimodal therapeutic approach.

Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: New Challenges with Immune Checkpoint Blockers and Targeted Therapies.

The recent advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has dramatically modified treatment strategies by improving the prognosis in this setting. Osimertinib and alectinib, both TKIs, have shown significant improvements in outcomes for patients with resected EGFR- and ALK-positive NSCLC, respectively, changing the standard of care in these subgroups. More recently, the LAURA trial showed the efficacy of osimertinib after chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. Numerous trials are still ongoing to investigate neoadjuvant/perioperative TKIs in several oncogene-driven NSCLC. In addition, several ICBs have been tested and approved as adjuvant (atezolizumab and pembrolizumab), neoadjuvant (nivolumab), and perioperative treatments (pembrolizumab) for patients with resectable early-stage NSCLC. Despite these advances, many challenges remain regarding the use of TKIs and ICBs in this setting, including the optimal duration of adjuvant TKI or induction ICB therapy, the role of minimal residual disease to identify patients at high-risk of disease relapse and to guide adjuvant treatment decisions, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in resected oncogene-driven NSCLC. Furthermore, potential predictive biomarkers for efficacy are needed to eventually intensify the entire perioperative strategies. This review aims to summarize and discuss the available evidence, the ongoing trials, and the challenges associated with TKI- and ICB-based approaches in early-stage NSCLC.

The current diagnosis and treatment strategy of breast cancer based on multicentre retrospective data in Shaanxi province

BackgroundBreast cancer is a common malignancy, and early detection coupled with standardized treatment is crucial for patient survival and recovery. This study aims to scrutinize the current state of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in Shaanxi province, providing valuable insights into the local practices and outcomes.MethodsWe selected 25 hospitals that typically represent the current diagnosis and treatment strategy of breast cancer in Shaanxi (a province in northwest China). The questionnaire comprised sections on fundamental information, outpatient consultations, breast-conserving surgery, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, breast reconstruction surgery.ResultsA total of 6665 breast cancer operations were performed in these 25 hospitals in 2021. The overall proportion of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is 23.6%. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the annual volume of breast cancer surgery and the implementation rate of BCS (P = 0.004). A total of 2882 cases of neoadjuvant treatment accounted for 43.24% of breast cancer patients treated with surgery in 2017. Hospitals in Xi’an performed more neoadjuvant therapy for patients with breast cancer compared to other districts (P = 0.008). There was a significantly positive correlation between outpatient visits and the implementation rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) (P = 0.005). 14 hospitals in Shaanxi performed reconstructive surgery.ConclusionsBreast conserving surgery, adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy in Shaanxi province have reached the China’s average level. Moreover, hospitals in Xi ’an have surpassed this average. However, a disparity is observed in the development of breast reconstruction surgery when compared to top-tier hospitals.

Pre-therapy Laparoscopic Jejunostomy Provides Safe, Reliable Nutrition for Trimodality GEJ Cancer Care

Background: Patients with locally advanced GEJ cancer may have severe obstruction and irreversible malnutrition requiring intervention such as TPN, stenting, or enteral access. Laparoscopic jejunostomy (LJ) is a reliable method of supplementing nutrition but is not widely used for fear of complications. At our institution we place LJ tubes preoperatively in such patients and aimed to evaluate their effectiveness. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemo-radiation and laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (LTHE) from 2013 to 2022 was performed. Nutritional markers, weight, and height were recorded, LJ associated complications were recorded from placement time to removal. Thirty-day complications after LTHE were recorded using Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: Of 165 patients who underwent LTHE, twenty patients (12.1%) had LJ placement prior to neoadjuvant therapy due to obstructive symptoms and a median [IQR] weight loss of 13.6 kg [9.07, 16.74] despite dietary modification. LJs were placed a median [IQR] of 103.5 [93.3, 116.8] days prior to LTHE. Median [IQR] weight gain from LJ placement to LTHE was 2.09 kg [0.1, 5.03], P = .01. There were no major complications and 3 (15%) minor complications. There were no unplanned feeding interruptions greater than 48 hours or disruptions in neoadjuvant treatment. There was 1 (5%) 30-day complication after LTHE and there was no mortality. The median [IQR] hospital stay was 7 days [6.5, 9]. Conclusion: Jejunostomy feeding tube prior to neoadjuvant treatment consistently reverses weight loss with minor, manageable complications. Reliable pre-therapy nutrition in obstructed patients is associated with excellent esophagectomy results and should be considered the adjuvant nutritional treatment of choice.

Clinical outcomes and short-term survival of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer: a multi-center retrospective cohort study

Objective: The present retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer and report the preliminary short-term survival. Methods: A multi-center, retrospective study was conducted concerning patients who received neoadjuvant PD-1 agents plus platinum-based chemotherapy between January, 2019 to January, 2022. The primary endpoint was the tumor pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Results: Two hundred and thirteen patients with initial stage cI-IVA esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were identified. Complete tumor resection(R0) rate was 99.1%. The pCR rate was 31.9%, and the overall major pathological response rate was 49.8%. The 2-year DFS rate was 78.9% (95%CI: 72.9%-85.4%) and 2-years OS rate was 80.9% (95%CI: 75.3%-86.9%). The incidence of TRAEs and surgical complications rate were 68.5% and 35.2%, respectively. Conclusion: The PD-1 agents combined with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment for resectable stage I–IVA esophageal cancer had a high pCR rate as well as good short-term survival benefit and tolerable toxicity.

Prognostic impact of aberrant right hepatic artery involvement in patients with pancreatic cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of aberrant right hepatic artery (A-RHA) involvement in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). This study enrolled 474 patients who underwent upfront pancreatectomy or neoadjuvant treatment for resectable (R) or borderline resectable (BR) PC from four institutions. The patients were divided into three groups: A-RHA involvement group (n = 12), patients who had sole A-RHA involvement without major arterial involvement; BR-A group (n = 104), patients who had major arterial involvement; R/BR-PV group (n = 358), others. All patients in the A-RHA involvement group underwent margin-negative resection. The median overall survival of the entire cohort in the A-RHA involvement, R/BR-PV, and BR-A groups was 41.2, 33.5, and 25.2 months, respectively. Although survival in the R/BR-PV group was significantly more favorable than that in the BR-A group (p = 0.0003), no significant difference was observed between the A-RHA involvement group and the R/BR-PV (p = 0.7332) and BR-A (p = 0.1485) groups. The prognosis of patients with PC and sole A-RHA involvement was comparable to that of patients with R/BR-PV.

High sensitivity ctDNA assays in genitourinary malignancies: current evidence and future directions.

In the recent decade, analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has improved cancer care by allowing for rapid detection of actionable molecular targets. A new generation of circulating DNA tests is now becoming available commercially. These tests are characterized by a superior limit of detection of 0.01% vaF or better, allowing for the detection of radiologically occult molecular residual disease (MRD). MRD tests have the potential to revolutionize neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment. In addition, these tests can be used as tumor markers to assess disease response. We reviewed the current evidence for the use of high-sensitivity MRD assays with particular focus on the genitourinary tumors. Multiple studies have now been reported in urothelial, renal, and recently testicular carcinoma. We find that the sensitivity varies across tumor types in the adjuvant setting and may reach a high of 100% in urothelial cancer. Specificity in tumor-informed MRD appears to be preserved across tumor types (98%-100%). Several trials are now prospectively validating MRD testing in biomarker integral studies, mainly in urothelial carcinoma.

Systemic Management of Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma.

Adrenocortical cancer (ACC) is a rare and aggressive disease. Surgery has traditionally been the primary treatment for locally advanced disease with ongoing controversy around the optimal neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment options. Unfortunately, local recurrence and the eventual development of metastatic disease is common and five-year survival rates are poor. While many trials have evaluated novel systemic agents to treat advanced adrenocortical cancer, only a few drugs have demonstrated any response at all. To date, only one drug, mitotane, is approved in the US for ACC and no regimen has clearly shown an increase in overall survival. In advanced metastatic or unresectable disease, data supports the first line regimen of EDP chemotherapy + mitotane as the primary treatment modality. In the second line, while data is limited, we would recommend consideration of immunotherapy using a PD(L)1 agent combined with a TKI/VEGF inhibitor or combination immunotherapy with PD1/CTLA-4 drugs. In all cases, we always prefer a clinical trial as available. This article reviews data from multiple studies evaluating novel systemic agents against ACC and discusses current systemic therapy combinations and ongoing clinical trials.

Radioembolization of HCC and secondary hepatic tumors: a comprehensive review.

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE), also called Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT), has emerged as an effective locoregional therapy for primary and secondary hepatic tumors, utilizing yttrium-90 (Y90) microspheres and other agents such as holmium-166 and rhenium-188. TARE has various applications in the management of HCC across different BCLC stages. Radiation segmentectomy, which involves administering high doses of Y90 (>190 Gy), can be both curative and ablative, achieving complete necrosis of the tumor. In contrast, radiation lobectomy involves administering a lower dose of Y90 (80-120 Gy) as a neoadjuvant treatment modality to improve local control and induce future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients who are planned to undergo surgery but have insufficient FLR. Modified radiation lobectomy combines both techniques and offers several advantages over portal vein embolization (PVE). Y90 is also used in downstaging HCC patients outside liver transplantation criteria, as well as bridging those awaiting liver transplantation (LT). Multiple studies and combined analyses were described to highlight the outcomes of TARE and compare it with other treatment modalities, including TACE and sorafenib. Additionally, the review delves into the efficacy and safety of radioembolization in managing metastatic colorectal cancer and other metastatic tumors to the liver. Recent studies have emphasized the role of personalized dosimetry for improved outcomes, and thus we described the different methods used for this purpose. Pretherapy imaging, estimating lung shunt, selection of therapeutic radionuclides, adverse effects, and cost-effectiveness were all discussed as well.

AB048. Evidence of effectiveness of neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas.

Recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) is a challenge with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. We conducted an open-label phase II study: neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (NCT04588987), and interim analysis showed very promising results. We are further searching for evidence of the effectiveness of this strategy. Patients with recurrent HGG received neoadjuvant treatment with camrelizumab (intravenous injection 200 mg on day 1) and apatinib (oral 250 mg per day on days 1-7), and 14 days later received surgery for recurrent tumor resection. Sequential therapy began 2 weeks after surgery with the biweekly camrelizumab (200 mg) and 4 weeks after surgery with the daily apatinib (250 mg) until investigator assessed progressive disease or unable to tolerate toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). When patients suspected progress during per-protocol treatment, re-surgery for resection of lesion was done, and the tissue was further examined. Between October 9, 2020, and March 30, 2024, 24 patients were enrolled [19 glioblastomas, one World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4 diffuse astrocytoma, three anaplastic astrocytoma, and one anaplastic oligodendroglioma]. Nineteen patients with interim analysis data, and showed the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.4-5.2], the median OS was 12.9 months (95% CI: 9.3-16.4) respectively, with a median follow-up time of 17.5 months (95% CI: 9.0-26.1). There were two patients who suspected progress and received second surgery. One patient showed real tumor progression with active tumor cells. While another patient the histology revealed mainly necrosis with inflammatory cells. Five patients initially showed increased enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) but without increased symptoms, and showed continuous improvement when receiving further treatment. This immuno-target combination neoadjuvant therapy in recurrent HGG demonstrated encouraging efficacy and revealed some evidence of efficacy, and worth to further investigate.

Conjecture on the next development direction of colorectal cancer and its minimally invasive surgery

The surgical treatment of colorectal cancer will be more and more accurate and minimally invasive under the guidance of precision medicine. At the same time, it will derive and evolve non-surgical paths, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and immune targeted therapy for microsatellite instability high/mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer, and wait and watch path after neoadjuvant treatment for low advanced rectal cancer. Laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer will be gradually iterated by robots, which is the only way to intelligent surgery.

The role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and outcomes.

Metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs) in rectal cancer significantly impact the prognosis and treatment strategies. Western practices emphasize neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), whereas Eastern approaches often rely on LPN dissection (LPND). This review examines the evolving role of LPND in the context of modern treatments, including total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and the impact of CRT on the management of clinically suspicious LPNs. We comprehensively reviewed the key literature comparing the outcomes of LPND versus preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, focusing on recent advancements and ongoing debates. Key studies, including the JCOG0212 trial and recent multicenter trials, were analyzed to assess the efficacy of LPND, particularly in conjunction with preoperative CRT or TNT. Current evidence indicates that LPND can reduce local recurrence rates compared to total mesorectal excision alone in patients not receiving radiation therapy. However, the benefit of LPND in the context of neoadjuvant CRT is influenced by the size and pretreatment characteristics of LPNs. While CRT can effectively control smaller metastatic LPNs, larger or clinically suspicious LPNs may require LPND for optimal outcomes. Advances in surgical techniques, such as robotic-assisted LPND, offer potential benefits but also present challenges and complications. The role of TNT in controlling metastatic LPNs and improving patient outcomes is emerging but remains underexplored. The decision to perform LPND should be individualized based on patient-specific factors, including LPN size, response to neoadjuvant treatment, and surgeon expertise. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and further evaluating the role of TNT in managing metastatic LPNs.

Identifying Complete Responders Following Chemotherapy-only Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer: Role of MRI.

Identifying Complete Responders Following Chemotherapy-only Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer: Role of MRI.

Neoadjuvant-Based Triple Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Type I/II Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis.

Hepatectomy could provide better survival benefit for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with type I/II portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). However, the postoperative recurrence remains high. We discussed whether neoadjuvant therapy could reduce HCC recurrence for these patients. One hundred and thirty-eight resectable HCC with type I-II PVTT were retrospectively included. The neoadjuvant therapy regimens included tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), programmed death 1(PD-1) antibodies and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize the influence of potential confounders. Thirty-three patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy and 105 patients underwent surgery alone. In the neoadjuvant group, 7 (21.2%) patients achieved stable disease, 13 (39.4%) achieved partial response and 13 (39.4%) achieved complete response based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criterion. By PSM, the neoadjuvant therapy resulted in less microvascular invasion (24.1% vs 50.0%, P=0.021), satellite nodule (6.9% vs 24.1%, P=0.036) and less patients with alpha-fetoprotein>20(ng/mL) (37.9% vs 69.0%, P=0.006). The neoadjuvant therapy reduced tumor recurrence and prolonged survival. Multivariate analysis found that neoadjuvant therapy was an independent protective factor for overall survival and recurrence free survival. Neoadjuvant treatment presents a promising treatment option for HCC patients with type I/II PVTT.

The KRAS G12D mutation increases the risk of unresectable recurrence of resectable colorectal liver-only metastasis.

Unresectable recurrence is a critical predictor of outcomes for colorectal cancer patients. We attempted to identify the prognostic factors, especially for unresectable recurrence-free survival (URFS) as a new endpoint, in patients with resectable colorectal liver-only metastasis (CRLOM). We investigated patients with resectable CRLOM, who underwent an R0 resection for both CRC and CRLOM between January, 2014 and March, 2019 at a single institution. The exclusion criteria were patients who received neoadjuvant treatment, the absence of data for genetic analyses, and the presence of multiple cancers, synchronous CRC, or familial adenomatous polyposis. The prognostic factors were examined retrospectively using data on pre-hepatectomy factors, including primary tumor molecular profiling results. We analyzed the data of 101 patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for CRLOM. Multivariate analysis revealed that KRAS G12D mutation-positivity (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.69; p < 0.01), RYR2 mutation-positivity (HR: 4.03; p < 0.01), and KRAS G12S mutation-positivity (HR: 3.96; p = 0.03), CA19-9 > 37 U/ml before hepatectomy (HR: 3.62; p < 0.01), and primary tumor pN2 stage (HR: 3.22; p = 0.03) were significant predictors of the URFS. This is the first study to show that specific KRAS and RYR2 mutations were associated with the URFS.

Real-world retrospective study of anti-PD-1 antibody in combination with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment strategy for locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Neoadjuvant therapy has become a mainstay of treatment for locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer. The objective of this research was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in treating surgically removable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). From January 1, 2016 to April 1, 2023, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with resectable esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. The primary endpoints of this study were pathologic complete response (pCR), major pathologic response (MPR) and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints of this study were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. A total of 122 patients with ESCC receiving neoadjuvant immune-chemotherapy (nICT) were included. Fifty-four patients achieved partial response (PR) and two patients achieved complete response (CR), with an ORR of 45.9%. Of the 106 patients who underwent surgery, a total of 28 patients achieved pCR (26.4%) and a total of 37 patients achieved MPR (34.9%). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 26 patients (21.3%). The most common postoperative complication was pneumonitis (25.5%). Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy demonstrates satisfactory efficacy in the treatment of locally advanced ESCC, with manageable treatment-related adverse events and postoperative complications.

Preliminary experience of surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for stage-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer.

Previously, stage-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been considered inoperable. In recent years, neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown encouraging efficacy in the treatment of advanced stage NSCLC in several trials. However, the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in treating stage-IIIB NSCLC are still unknown. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective study to examine the outcomes of surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for stage-IIIB NSCLC. Thirty patients with stage-IIIB NSCLC who were treated at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Renji Hospital from January 2019 to September 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy was administered prior to surgery. The curative effect was evaluated by imaging and pathological examinations. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the patients after neoadjuvant therapy evaluated by imaging studies were 70% and 86.7%, respectively. Of the 30 patients, 19 (63%) underwent surgical resection, in which all achieved a complete R0 resection. The median operative time was 168 minutes (range, 75-295 minutes), and the average intraoperative blood loss was 215.3±258.4 mL. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range, 4-59 days). The major pathological response (MPR) rate was 73.7% (14/19), and the pathological complete response rate was 47.4% (9/19); 2/30 patients (6.7%) had postoperative complications, including two who developed bronchopleural fistulas and one mortality, from a postoperative pulmonary infection. The treatment-related adverse reactions were mainly grades 1-2. Only two patients had grade 3 anemia, and no grade 4 adverse reactions were observed. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy combined with surgery in patients with stage-IIIB NSCLC is safe and feasible. The patient outcomes and optimal number of neoadjuvant treatment cycles need to be explored and studied further.

New Frontiers in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treatment.

Despite the introduction of targeted vaccines and screening protocols, locally advanced cervical cancer represents a median proportion of 37% among all cervical carcinomas. Compared to early stages, it presents significantly lower cure rates, with a 5-year disease-free survival rate of 68% and a 5-year overall survival rate of 74%. According to current guidelines, definitive radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy represents the gold standard for locally advanced cervical cancer treatment. However, a significant number of patients relapse and die from metastatic disease. The aim of this narrative review is to examine the recent advancements in treating locally advanced cervical cancer, exploring new frontiers in therapeutic approaches. The PubMed database and clinical trial registries were searched to identify relevant articles published on locally advanced cervical cancer treatment up to March 2024, mainly focusing on papers published in the last decade. Abstracts presented at major international congresses that bring relevant evidence were included. Progress achieved in refining radiotherapy techniques, recent evidence regarding neoadjuvant treatment preceding surgery or concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and key findings concerning adjuvant treatment are thoroughly explored. Furthermore, a comprehensive review of prominent phase II and phase III trials examining the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors is conducted, analyzing the various contexts in which they are applied. In light of the new evidence that has emerged in recent years and is discussed in this article, the appropriate selection of the most suitable therapeutic approach for each patient remains a complex but crucial issue.

The NEOLETRIB trial: neoadjuvant treatment with Letrozole and Ribociclib in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Chemotherapy is used as neoadjuvant therapy for all subgroups of breast cancer, including ER-positive, and HER2-negative cases. However, studies have suggested that using aromatase inhibitors combined with CDK4/6-inhibitors might be an appropriate alternative in selected patients. Thus, the NEOLETRIB trial evaluates the response of ER-positive, HER2-negative luminal A/B breast cancer to the combination of letrozole and ribociclib in the neoadjuvant setting. Comprehensive molecular biology procedures, including sequential single-cell RNA-sequencing of tumor biopsies, are performed during 6 months of treatment with extensive biobanking of blood samples, tumor biopsies and gut microbiome specimens. Our findings will hopefully contribute to an improved selection of patients who may benefit from this drug combination and give new insights into the intra-tumoral changes during this treatment.Trial registration number: NCT05163106 (ClinicalTrials.gov).