Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Research Articles

An objective measure of response on whole-body MRI in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy, external beam radiotherapy, and radium-223.

The aim of this study was to generate an objective method to describe MRI data to assess response in the vertebrae of patients with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), treated with external beam radiation therapy and systemic therapy with Radium-223 and to correlate changes with clinical outcomes. Three sets of whole-body MRI (WBMRI) images were utilized from 25 patients from the neo-adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy pelvic Radiotherapy and RADium-223 (ADRRAD) clinical trial: MRI1 (up to 28 days before Radium-223), MRI2, and MRI3 (2 and 6 months post completion of Radium-223). Radiological response was assessed based on post baseline MRI images. Vertebrae were semi-automatically contoured in the sagittal T1-weighted (T1w) acquisitions, MRI intensity was measured, and spinal cord was used to normalize the measurements. The relationship between MRI intensity vs time to biochemical progression and radiology response was investigated. Survival curves were generated and splitting measures for survival and biochemical progression investigated. Using a splitting measure of 1.8, MRI1 was found to be a reliable quantitative indicator correlating with overall survival (P = 0.023) and biochemical progression (P = 0.014). MRI (3-1) and MRI (3-2) were found to be significant indicators for patients characterized by progressive/non-progressive disease (P = 0.021, P = 0.004) and biochemical progression within/after 12 months (P = 0.007, P = 0.001). We have identified a potentially useful objective measure of response on WBMRI of vertebrae containing bone metastases in mHSPC which correlates with survival/progression (prognostic) and radiology response (predictive). Measurements of T1w WBMRI normalized intensity may allow identifying potentially useful response biomarkers correlating with survival, radiological response and biochemical progression.

Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy or chemoradiation plus consolidative chemotherapy followed by radical operation for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Limited evidence compares short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT), both of which are followed by consolidative chemotherapy before radical rectal surgery. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess treatment response, survival outcomes, and toxicity in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients (cT3-4 and/or N+) treated with SCRT or LCCRT, consolidative chemotherapy, or total mesorectal excision between 2013 and 2021 were identified. the cause-specific cumulative incidence of disease-related treatment failure, locoregional recurrence, distant metastases, and overall survival were evaluated using flexible parametric competing risk analysis and Kaplan-Meier methods, adjusted for treatment regimens and clinicopathological factors. A pathological complete response (pCR), tumor downstaging, and toxicity have been reported. Among the 144 patients, 115 (80%) underwent curative rectal surgery. The LCCRT and SCRT groups achieved pCR in 10 (18%) and seven (12%) patients, respectively (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-4.78). The adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio for disease-related treatment failure with LCCRT versus SCRT was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.08-0.87). Three-year cumulative probability of disease-related treatment failure was 10.0% and 25.6% for LCCRT and SCRT, respectively. No significant differences in T-downstaging, N-downstaging, significant pathologic downstaging (ypT0-2N0), locoregional failure, distant metastasis, or overall survival were found. Late rectal toxicity occurred in 10 (15%) LCCRT and two (3%) SCRT patients, respectively. LCCRT with consolidative chemotherapy demonstrated improved disease-related treatment failure compared with SCRT, despite higher late rectal toxicity. Further research is needed to assess the long-term oncologic outcomes and toxicity.

Neoadjuvant anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) therapy in patients (pts) with resectable mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): EPOC2201.

TPS226 Background: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by surgical resection is a standard treatment for LARC. As anti-PD-1 therapy for patients with dMMR colorectal cancer is responsive in the context of metastatic disease, several clinical trials which evaluate the efficacies of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with dMMR LARC are on-going and suggested the outstanding responses (Cercek A. et al., N Engl J Med 2022). Methods: We initiated the EPOC 2201 VOLTAGE-2 study, which is an ongoing, non-randomized, single-arm phase II trial. The major eligibility criteria were as follows: treatment-naïve with rectal cancer located 12 cm from the anal verge; confirmed dMMR; clinical stage II/III in primary cohort (N=35) and stage I in exploratory cohort (N=20); age ≥ 18; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1; and presence of sufficient organ function. The study treatments include 12 cycles of nivolumab (NIVO) monotherapy (240 mg every 2 weeks) followed by assessment using Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSKCC) Regression Schema (Smith J.J. et al., BMC Cancer 2015). If clinical complete response (cCR) or near complete response (nCR) are observed, non-operative management with additional 12 cycles of NIVO will be performed. If incomplete response (IR) is observed, standard chemoradiotherapy with 50.4Gy of radiation plus capecitabine followed by surgery will be performed. The primary endpoint is the 2-year cCR rate in primary cohort. Various survival endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are assessed as secondary endpoints. Safety analyses are performed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ver. 5.0, and the Clavien‒Dindo classification (ver. 2.0) is added for postoperative complications. Assuming null and alternative hypotheses, cCR rates of 23% and 45%, the planned sample size for primary cohort was set at 35, with a one-sided alpha of 5% and power of 80%. An exploratory biomarker study was also conducted using serially collected tumor and blood samples. Whole genome-based minimal residual disease (MRD) assay and whole exome/whole transcriptome-based tumor and immune microenvironment analyses are performed. As of August 2023, patient’s enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: jRCT2031220484 .

Contribution of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy versus stereotactic body radiation therapy alone) on tumor volume regression in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A single institution experience.

707 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis with a minority of patients (pts) eligible for curative resection. Pts with borderline resectable or locally advanced (BR/LA) PDAC frequently receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) +/- radiation therapy (RT) to improve resectability. Here, we report the individual contribution of NAC and RT (either intensity modulated RT + concurrent chemotherapy (IMRT+CC) or stereotactic body RT (SBRT) alone) on tumor regression by measuring tumor volumes. Methods: We performed a single institution retrospective review of PDAC pts who underwent resection between 2011-2021 and were part of a tumor biobank registry. Tumor measurements were performed at baseline, post-NAC, and post-RT by five independent, blinded abdominal radiologists. Analyses were performed using paired t-tests, two-proportion z-tests, log-rank tests, and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: We identified 49 BR/LA pts who received NAC followed by RT who had complete pre- and post-treatment imaging. Fifteen pts received IMRT+CC and 28 received SBRT. The effect of NAC on tumor volumes (-29.2% vs -26.3%, p=0.66; mean percent change) and maximum diameter (-9.2% vs -12.0%, p=0.58) was similar within the IMRT+CC and SBRT groups. Both IMRT+CC (-7.12 cm3, p=0.003) and SBRT (-2.70 cm3, p=0.001) resulted in significant tumor regressions. IMRT+CC achieved a significantly greater overall mean percent change in tumor volume (-53.4% vs -28.8%, p=0.024) and maximum diameter (-30.4% vs -16.2%, p=0.020) compared to SBRT. Pts receiving IMRT+CC or SBRT had similar tumor volumes (10.88 vs 11.74 cm3, p=0.87, respectively) and maximum diameter (3.45 vs 3.17 cm, p=0.48) prior to RT. IMRT+CC resulted in improved tumor volume response (>30% regression; 80.0% vs 46.4%; p=0.033) but not an improved response rate by RECIST criteria (46.7% vs 21.4%; p=0.085). Mean resected tumor volumes (by pathological review) for those receiving IMRT+CC (n=9) and SBRT (n=23) were 4.34 vs 13.1 cm3 (p=0.049). The R0 (86.7% vs 85.7%, p=0.93) and N0 (73.3% vs 53.6%, p=0.21) resection rates between the two groups were similar. Compared to SBRT, IMRT+CC resulted in an improved recurrence free survival (RFS; 2.36 vs 1.31 years; p=0.026), but did not meet statistical significance for an overall survival benefit (mOS; 2.85 vs 2.03 years, p=0.19). Conclusions: We found that IMRT+CC yielded superior radiographic volumetric regression and improved RFS but did not significantly impact mOS. Correspondingly, resected tumors from patients treated with IMRT+CC were smaller than those obtained from patients treated with SBRT. The role of IMRT+CC and SBRT in PDAC remains to be clearly defined.

Real-world adoption of 3 months of adjuvant oxaliplatin chemotherapy in patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC).

83 Background: Based on the IDEA analysis, 3 months (mos) of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) with CAPOX has emerged as an option for both low-risk and high-risk stage III CRC. This has resource utilization, cost and toxicity benefits (particularly less neurotoxicity) without compromising efficacy. This study examines the patterns of uptake of CAPOX vs FOLFOX and duration of ACT in a contemporary post-COVID real-world cohort of patients (pts) in the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada. Methods: The provincial pharmacy database was used to identify pts with resected stage III CRC who received adjuvant CAPOX or FOLFOX between January 2021 and December 2022. Pts with rectal cancer requiring neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded. Demographic, tumor, and treatment information was collected. “High-risk features” were defined as pT4 or pN2 tumors. “Urban” setting was defined based on the population size of the regional health authority. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed to examine baseline characteristics and Fisher’s exact test was used to examine univariate associations. Results: 452 pts were included, of which 234 (52%) and 218 (48%) were planned to receive 3 and 6 mos of ACT respectively (see table). Within the 3 mos group, 226 (97%) received CAPOX. Within the 6 mos group, there was a 51%/49% split between CAPOX/FOLFOX. By univariate analysis, factors associated with 3 mos of CAPOX vs 6 mos of ACT were age >70y (P=0.039), low/intermediate grade (P=0.005) and low-risk stage III disease (P<0.0001). 29% of pts planned for 6 mos of oxaliplatin ACT had low-risk disease, with 52% of these receiving CAPOX. Conclusions: 3 mos of adjuvant CAPOX is an accepted option for nearly all pts with stage III disease with consequent less neurotoxicity and fewer treatment visits. Yet, in this contemporary cohort, use of 3 mos of adjuvant CAPOX remains low and is associated with older age and low-risk disease. 6 mos of oxaliplatin is still being offered to pts with low-risk disease. Exploration of patient preferences, real-world treatment and time toxicities, and resource costs may improve more widespread adoption of 3 mos of adjuvant CAPOX in stage III CRC. [Table: see text]

Postoperative complications following neoadjuvant therapy and surgery in a phase 2 borderline resectable pancreatic cancer clinical trial (Alliance A021501).

664 Background: Postoperative complications in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy and pancreatectomy in the national cooperative group setting have not been previously characterized. Further, the impact of preoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy on postoperative outcomes is largely unknown. We sought to quantify perioperative morbidity among patients with pancreatic cancer who received neoadjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy with or without hypofractionated radiotherapy on a multicenter clinical trial. Methods: The A021501 phase 2 trial randomized patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to 8 doses of mFOLFIRINOX (Arm 1) or 7 doses of mFOLFIRINOX then hypofractionated radiotherapy (Arm 2), followed by pancreatectomy (Dec 31, 2016-Jan 1, 2019). Patients underwent resection according to defined operative standards at enrolling centers without specific requirements for either surgeon or hospital volume. Surgical complications and adverse events were assessed and captured at a single time point of 90 days after surgery and compared between treatment arms. Results: Of 126 enrolled patients, 51 (40%) underwent pancreatectomy (n=32, Arm 1; n=19, Arm 2) at 28 institutions. Vascular resection was performed in 19 patients (37%). One patient in Arm 2 died within 90 days after surgery. Rates of any surgical complication were 19% (n=6) in Arm 1 and 42% (n=8) in Arm 2 (p=0.07). Median length of stay was 7 days (range 5-38 days). Five (10%) patients required reoperation within 90 days. Readmission rates were higher in Arm 2 than Arm 1 (16% vs. 42%, p=0.04) but there were no differences in rates of reoperation, pancreatic fistula or abscess requiring drainage, or wound infection between study arms. 54% of patients (n=26/48) experienced a grade 3 or higher adverse event, with no difference between treatment arms (47% versus 67%, p=0.7). Rates of initiation of adjuvant therapy did not differ between treatment arms (66% vs. 68%, p=0.4). Pancreatic fistula and abscess were associated with adjuvant therapy (p<0.01). No difference in overall survival was observed based on occurrence of surgical complications (HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.5-2.6). Conclusions: In this national cooperative group study of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer,postoperative complications following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, and surgical resection were consistent with rates previously reported by high-volume institutions and using large datasets. Multimodality trials of preoperative therapy for locoregionally advanced pancreatic cancer may be safely performed in the cooperative group setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02839343 .

Non-responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Characteristics and outcomes.

662 Background: For patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma, resection and systemic therapy remain the mainstays of curative-intent treatment. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been frequently employed with the goals of addressing systemic disease early and improving patient selection for surgery. Those who do not respond to neoadjuvant therapy present a challenge with a lack of randomized data to aid in decision making. Here we sought to define the characteristics and outcomes of those patients to guide clinical practice. Methods: This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study using a prospectively maintained database of those diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients included in the study were those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Non-responders were defined as those with both no radiographic and no biochemical response at the first re-assessment after initiation of therapy. Results: A total of 176 patients were identified who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with curative intent. Of those, 42 (23.8%) patients had no evidence of either radiographic or biochemical response. Of those patients, 14 were upfront resectable (33.3%) and 20 were borderline resectable (47.6%). An additional 8 (19%) were locally advanced. Most patients received FOLFIRINOX as a first line chemotherapy agent (n = 25, 59.5%). A total of 12 (28.6%) patients underwent neoadjuvant radiation therapy. A total of 19 (45.2%) proceeded to surgery and two of those were found to be unresectable at exploration, resulting in 17 (40.5%) who ultimately received curative-intent resection. Exactly half (n = 21) of the patients had their chemotherapy switched (CS). Of those who had CS, 11 (52.4%) had evidence of local tumor progression on their initial restaging scan compared to just 3 (14.3%) of those who did not (p = 0.02). Additionally, patients who had CS had higher incidence of vascular involvement on their initial scan (90.5% vs 52.3%, p = 0.051). A total of 6 (28.6%) who underwent CS had subsequent biochemical response compared 4 (19.0%) of those who did not. Ultimately, 6 (28.6%) of those who had CS ultimately proceeded to surgery compared to 13 (61.9%) of those who did not (p = 0.062). Interestingly, there was no significant difference in median overall survival between those who had CS (18.6 months) and those who did not (19.9 months, p = 0.525). Conclusions: Non-responders to frontline neoadjuvant systemic therapy present a clinical challenge and have poor rates of curative-intent resection. Chemotherapy switch was employed mostly in cases with worse prognostic factors and thus infrequently lead to resection. Despite this, patients who underwent CS had similar overall survival to those who did not. These data suggest there may be a role for chemotherapy switch in those who do not respond to front line chemotherapy.

Trends and Variation in the Use of Radiotherapy in Non-metastatic Rectal Cancer: a 14-year Nationwide Overview from the Netherlands

AimsThis study describes nationwide primary radiotherapy utilisation trends for non-metastasised rectal cancer in the Netherlands between 2008 and 2021. In 2014, both colorectal cancer screening and a new guideline specifying prognostic risk groups for neoadjuvant treatment were implemented. Materials and methodsPatients with non-metastasised rectal cancer in 2008–2021 (n = 37 510) were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and classified into prognostic risk groups. Treatment was studied over time and age. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were carried out to identify factors associated with (i) radiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy use for intermediate rectal cancer and (ii) chemoradiotherapy without versus with surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer. ResultsFor early rectal cancer, the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy decreased (15% to 5% between 2008 and 2021), whereas the use of endoscopic resections increased (8% in 2015, 17% in 2021). In intermediate-risk rectal cancer, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (43% until 2011, 25% in 2015) shifted to radiotherapy (42% in 2008, 50% in 2015), the latter being most often applied in older patients. In locally advanced rectal cancer, the use of chemoradiotherapy without surgery increased (2–4% in 2008–2013, 17% in 2019–2021). Both neoadjuvant treatment in intermediate disease and omission of surgery following chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced disease varied with increasing age (odds ratio>75vs<50: 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.54–3.06) and treatment region (Southwest and Northwest odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.42–0.93 and odds ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.44–0.95, respectively, compared with the North). ConclusionTreatment patterns in non-metastasised rectal cancer significantly changed over time. Effects of both the national screening programme and the new treatment guideline were apparent, as well as a paradigm shift towards organ preservation (watch-and-wait). Observed regional variations may indicate adoption differences regarding new treatment strategies.

Impact of facility volume on outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with radiotherapy.

644 Background: The impact of facility volume on overall survival (OS) outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) treated with radiotherapy (RT), both standard chemoradiation (CRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is not well-defined. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 16,315 patients with locally advanced (LA) or borderline resectable (BR) PC from the National Cancer Database (2004-2019) who received neoadjuvant RT or RT without surgery across RT facilities with low- (&lt;10 cases/yr), intermediate- (10-20 cases/yr), and high-volumes (&gt;20 cases/yr) of PC cases. Log rank and cox regression were used for univariable and multivariable survival analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated. Results: Patients were largely treated at low (n=8055) volume centers, followed by intermediate (n=3783), and high (n=4477). Approximately half of the cohort were male (51.4%), and predominantly white (82.5%), and non-Hispanic (92%). On univariable analysis (Table), high-volume centers had improved survival outcomes in the overall population, as well as in both SBRT and CRT subsets (p&lt;0.0001). On multivariable analysis, treatment during the most recent time period: 2016-2019 (HR 0.646, p&lt;0.001), receiving care at a high-volume center (HR 0.844, p&lt;0.001), use of SBRT (HR 0.915, p&lt;0.001), administration of multiagent chemotherapy (HR 0.706, p&lt;0.001) and undergone surgical resection (HR 0.405, p&lt;0.001) were associated with improved OS. In a subgroup analysis of patients receiving SBRT, median OS was 22.6 months for high-volume, 20.0 for intermediate-volume and 18.4 months at low-volume centers (p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: Patients receiving RT for LAPC or BRPC at high-volume centers had longer OS compared to those receiving radiation at intermediate- or low-volume centers. In those undergoing SBRT, treatment at high-volume centers had improved OS compared to intermediate- and low-volume centers. These findings suggest that radiation oncologists’ expertise is critical for providing high-quality RT in PC, especially for SBRT.[Table: see text]

Clinical, Diagnostic, and Treatment Characteristics of Orbital Liposarcoma

PurposeTo clarify the clinical, diagnostic and treatment characteristics of orbital liposarcoma. DesignRetrospective observational case series. MethodsReview of electronic medical records, histopathology, radiological images and follow-up information of 21 patients with orbital liposarcoma. ResultsThe predominant clinical manifestation of this disease was painless exophthalmos. The most frequently encountered pathological types were well-differentiated and myxoid liposarcoma. Preoperative radiological images from 15 patients showed that orbital liposarcoma initially developed in extraocular muscle in 9 patients. Furthermore, all well-differentiated liposarcomas exhibited the radiographic characteristics of irregular and ill-defined adipose tissue, whereas only 12.5% of myxoid liposarcomas had the imaging characteristics. For the patients who exclusively underwent surgery, all cases with subtotal excisions experienced recurrence, 63.6% of marginal excisions recurred and 50% of wide excisions resulted in recurrence. However, none of the patients who underwent marginal excisions or wide excisions combined with adjuvant radiotherapy exhibited recurrence. The analysis of MRI findings in three patients who underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy revealed that the tumor size remained stable in a patient with well-differentiated liposarcoma, while another patient with the same type of tumor exhibited a gradual increase in size. Conversely, a patient with myxoid liposarcoma experienced a significant reduction in tumor size following neoadjuvant radiotherapy. ConclusionOrbital liposarcoma demonstrated a propensity for developing in the extraocular muscle. The radiological images of well-differentiated liposarcomas were characterized by irregular and ill-defined adipose tissue. Surgery combined with radiotherapy demonstrates potential in reducing recurrence rates. Notably, orbital myxoid liposarcoma exhibited greater sensitivity to radiotherapy compared to well-differentiated liposarcoma.

ASO Author Reflections: Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma; Low-Dose Radiation, Low-Dose Expectations?

ASO Author Reflections: Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma; Low-Dose Radiation, Low-Dose Expectations?

Consistency between POLARS and LARS scores regarding the incidence of low anterior resection syndrome in a Chilean population undergoing rectal surgery secondary to cancer in a high-volume hospital.

The aim of this work was to evaluate the concordance between the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and preoperative LARS (POLARS) scores regarding the incidence of LARS in a Chilean population undergoing rectal surgery for cancer in a high-volume hospital. The LARS score questionnaire, following telephone requests, was used to determine the presence and severity of LARS. The POLARS score was calculated based on variables described previously. Correlations and qualitative and quantitative concordance were evaluated using Spearman's correlation coefficient, the kappa coefficient and the Bland-Altman plot with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. A total of 120 patients met the inclusion criteria: 37.5% underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy, 61% underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) and 51.6% underwent ostomy. A total of 49% of patients did not present with LARS, whereas 28% had major LARS. The correlation between scales was poor, with a fair qualitative concordance to determine the presence/absence of LARS and a slight qualitative concordance to determine the degree of the intensity. The quantitative concordance was poor. In the Chilean population, concordance between the LARS and POLARS scores was qualitatively fair to determine the presence/absence of the disease and qualitatively slight to determine the degree of intensity. We do not suggest using the POLARS score in the perioperative period in the Chilean population deliberately, as the score may help to determine the presence/absence of LARS but cannot determine its degree of intensity. Additional evaluations are required to determine the factors contributing to the degree of agreement between the scales.

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy and wound complication: literature review and review of single surgeon series of myxoid liposarcoma treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy followed by surgery

Abstract Introduction: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NART) is often used in the treatment of extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS) including myxoid liposarcoma (MLS). Postoperative major wound complications (WC) are a well-recognised problem following NART. Aims: A review of the literature regarding the definition and incidence of WC following NART and surgery for STS and a retrospective review of a single surgeon series of 25 MLS. Methods: A literature search for papers focusing on MLS, NART and WC was performed, with 12 papers being reviewed. Retrospective data from a single surgeon series of 25 patients with MLS, treated with NART and surgery, were reviewed, focussing on WC. Results: The average rate of WC from the 12 papers included was 29·4% (20–47%), and the average rate of reoperation was 15·6% (7·3–24%). There were a range of definitions used for WC, most commonly O’Sullivan’s definition. In the single surgeon series, two patients (8%) developed WC and were treated conservatively, and there were no reoperations within 120 days. Conclusion: This literature review identified that there was a lack of consistency between the definitions used for major WC. The single surgeon series of MLS showed WC that were lower when compared to the reviewed literature (8% versus 29·4%).

The Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index as an Independent Predictor of Survival in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy.

Patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) scheduled for neoadjuvant radiotherapy still have a poor prognosis. This study was to explore the prognostic value of the pretreatment systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in patients with locally advanced ESCC after neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NRT). Eighty-two consecutive patients with ESCC scheduled for neoadjuvant radiotherapy between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled in this study. SII values (SII = platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte), prognostic nutritional index values (PNI = albumin concentration (g/L) + 5 × total lymphocyte count (109/L)), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were retrospectively collected and calculated before treatment. The Cut-off Finder application was applied to find out the cut-off points of the SII, NLR, PNI and PLR. A regression model was used to examine prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) rates. The median follow-up was 44 months (3 to 83). Sixty patients (73.17%) underwent surgery as scheduled. This study found that factors improving OS were a lower SII (≤916.6 × 109/L) (P=0.040) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) (P=0.034). The patients with a lower SII and NCRT had a better OS (P< 0.001). Moreover, additionally, a higher SII was associated with a lower resectability rate (P=0.035). The SII can predict resectability in ESCC patients following neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Both the SII and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy appear to influence OS.

Long-term outcome of centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma treated by neoadjuvant radiotherapy and radical resection: a propensity score matched study.

Centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) typically presents challenges in surgical intervention and is associated with a bleak prognosis. In order to address this pressing issue, it is imperative to identify a comprehensive treatment approach, such as neoadjuvant radiotherapy (neoRT), that can enhance the prognosis of patients diagnosed with centrally located HCC. Patients who had surgical resections for HCC between March 2015 and December 2020 were included in the study. Patients were assigned to either the neoRT combined with liver resection (neoRT+LR) group or the liver resection alone (LR) group. The study employed propensity-score analysis and Cox proportional-hazards regression models as research methodologies. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated in patients. During the study, 162 patients were enrolled, with 41 receiving neoRT+LR and 121 receiving LR. The duration of the median follow-up period was 45 months. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates were 95, 70, and 70% for patients in the neoRT+LR group, and 82, 64, and 54% for patients in the LR group, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year, 5-year DFS rates were 71, 53, and 37% for patients in the neoRT+LR group, and 52, 38, and 34% for patients in the LR group, respectively. A successful matching of 37 patients was achieved through propensity-score analysis. OS and DFS after matching analysis was statistically different between the two groups ( P=0.0099, P=0.034, respectively). neoRT was an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS [hazard ratio (HR)=0.47, 95% CI: 0.24-0.93; HR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.92, respectively]. According to matching analysis, there were no statistically significant differences observed in terms of baseline characteristics, surgical safety, and complications between the groups. Liver resection and neoRT can be advantageous for patients with centrally located HCC.

Delays in diagnosis and surgery of sarcoma patients during the COVID-19 outbreak in Spain.

Social distancing and quarantine implanted during the COVID-19 outbreak could have delayed the accession of oncologic patients to hospitals and treatments. This study analysed the management of sarcoma patients during this period in five Spanish hospitals. Clinical data from adult sarcoma patients, soft tissue and bone sarcomas, managed during the COVID-19 outbreak, from 15 March to 14 September 2020 (Covid cohort), were retrospectively collected and time for diagnosis, surgery and active treatments were compared with sarcoma patients managed during the same pre-pandemic period in 2018 (Control cohort). A total of 126 and 182 new sarcoma patients were enrolled in the Covid and Control cohorts, respectively, who were mainly diagnosed as soft tissue sarcomas (81.0% and 80.8%) and at localized stage (80.2% and 79.1%). A diagnostic delay was observed in the Covid cohort with a median time for the diagnosis of 102.5 days (range 6-355) versus 83 days (range 5-328) in the Control cohort (p = 0.034). Moreover, a delay in surgery was observed in cases with localized disease from the Covid cohort with a median time of 96.0 days (range 11-265) versus 54.5 days (range 2-331) in the Control cohort (p = 0.034). However, a lower delay for neoadjuvant radiotherapy was observed in the Covid cohort with a median time from the diagnosis to the neoadjuvant radiotherapy of 47 days (range 27-105) versus 91 days (range 27-294) in the Control cohort (p = 0.039). No significant differences for adjuvant radiotherapy, neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant/adjuvant palliative chemotherapy were observed between both cohorts. Neither progression-free survival (PFS) nor overall survival (OS) was significantly different. Delays in diagnosis and surgery were retrospectively observed in sarcoma patients during the COVID-19 outbreak in Spain, while the time for neoadjuvant radiotherapy was reduced. However, no impact on the PFS and OS was observed.

Novel radiation and targeted therapy combinations for improving rectal cancer outcomes.

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used as standard treatment for rectal cancer. However, response rates are variable and survival outcomes remain poor, highlighting the need to develop new therapeutic strategies. Research is focused on identifying novel methods for sensitising rectal tumours to RT to enhance responses and improve patient outcomes. This can be achieved through harnessing tumour promoting effects of radiation or preventing development of radio-resistance in cancer cells. Many of the approaches being investigated involve targeting the recently published new dimensions of cancer hallmarks. This review article will discuss key radiation and targeted therapy combination strategies being investigated in the rectal cancer setting, with a focus on exploitation of mechanisms which target the hallmarks of cancer.

Short-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and toripalimab for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCALE-1): a single-arm phase Ib clinical trial

BackgroundThe optimal dosages, timing, and treatment sequencing for standard-of-care neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy necessitate re-evaluation when used in conjunction with immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell...

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy and liver transplantation for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a thirty-year experience with long-term survival

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy and liver transplantation for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a thirty-year experience with long-term survival

Current landscape of gastrointestinal radiation oncology in Spain: a multicenter real-life survey and comparison with key clinical guidelines.

The GI Tumors Workgroup, a division of the Spanish Society of Radiation Therapy, conducted a survey in December 2020 to assess the adherence of radiation oncologists in Spain to international guidelines for gastrointestinal tumors. Using Google Forms, we designed a survey covering treatments for esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, and rectal cancers. In esophageal cancer treatment, neoadjuvant chemoradiation was the standard in 76.7% of institutions. Radiation doses range from 41.1 to 50.4 Gy in conventional fractionation. Planning positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed in 83.3% of centers, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy/volumetric-arc radiation therapy (IMRT/VMAT) was the preferred technique in 86.7% of institutions. For gastric cancer, 71.4% followed perioperative chemotherapy guidelines. In the case of adjuvant radiotherapy, the majority prescribed 45-50.4 Gy, and 82.1% used IMRT/VMAT for treatment. For pancreas cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in borderline resectable tumors and induction chemotherapy followed by radical radiotherapy for non-resectable tumors were the most frequent approaches. IMRT/VMAT was the primary technique. Locally advanced rectal cancer treatment is mainly based on neoadjuvant radiotherapy in all institutions. The preferred radiation doses typically range from 45 to 50 Gy in conventional fractionation. IMRT/VMAT was standard in most Institutions. Spain's radiotherapy practices among respondents generally align with international guidelines for GI tumors highlighting Spain's commitment to evidence-based medical practice.