Field studies were conducted on Fox loamy sand to compare fall and spring broadcast and spring row application of DD (mixture of 1,3-dichloropropene, 1,2-dichloropropane, and related C3 hydrocarbons) and Vorlex (methyl isothiocyanate, 20%, + 1,3-dichloropropene, and related C3 hydrocarbons, 80%), and to compare these fumigants with Mocap (O-ethyl S,S-dipropyl phosphorodithioate), fensulfothion (O,O-diethyl O-[p-(methylsulfinyl) phenyl] phosphorothioate), and carbofuran (2,3-dihydro-2, 2-dimethylbenzofuranyl-7 N-methylcarbamate) for the control of Pratylenchus penetrans (Cobb) Filip. and Stek. 1941 in flue-cured tobacco. All the nematicides except fensulfothion resulted in lower soil nematode population counts in July in a highly infested field where the number of nematodes before treatment was 4700/kg of soil. All treatments, except fall-applied Vorlex, fensulfothion, and carbofuran, increased yield. In the second year, with a lower nematode population (2000 P. penetrans/kg of soil), no increase in yield resulted from any nematicidal treatment. Spring broadcast DD lowered reducing sugars and increased total alkaloids, total N, and Cl for the 2-year averages. Spring application of DD in the row also increased Cl but did not affect the other constituents. Some phytotoxic effects were observed with the nonfumigant nematicides, but chemical composition of the cured leaf was not affected. A greenhouse study with these five nematicides, in the absence of nematodes, showed no increase in growth of tobacco, but the population of NH4+–N oxidizers was lower with DD and Mocap and the number of NO3−–N oxidizers was lower with Vorlex, DD, and carbofuran.