Negative Syndrome Scale Total Score Research Articles

Exposure-Response Modeling in Adults and Adolescents With Schizophrenia to Support the Extrapolation of Brexpiprazole Efficacy to Adolescents.

In order to accelerate drug development and avoid unnecessary drug trials in vulnerable pediatric populations, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a general advice letter to sponsors permitting the effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults to be extrapolated to adolescents. Extrapolation is based on the evidence-based assumptions that (1) disease characteristics and (2) response to therapy, are similar in adults and adolescents. Whereas the FDA validated the extrapolation approach using data from multiple drug development programs, aripiprazole data are the most relevant to confirm the validity of the extrapolation approach for brexpiprazole, since aripiprazole and brexpiprazole both modulate dopaminergic and serotonergic signaling in the brain. The aims of this analysis were (1) to quantitatively assess the aripiprazole exposure (average steady-state concentration)-response (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score change from baseline) similarity between adults and adolescents with schizophrenia, (2) to extend the aripiprazole exposure-response modeling to brexpiprazole using adult data, and (3) to use the brexpiprazole model to predict schizophrenia symptom response in adolescents. Disease-drug-dropout models were developed using patient-level data from clinical studies of aripiprazole (1007 adults, 294 adolescents) and brexpiprazole (1235 adults) in schizophrenia. The aripiprazole model demonstrated similar exposure-response between adults and adolescents with schizophrenia, validating the extrapolation approach. Extrapolation of the brexpiprazole adult exposure-response model to adolescents predicted the efficacy of brexpiprazole in adolescents aged 13-17 years with schizophrenia.

Efficacy and Safety of Xanomeline-Trospium Chloride in Schizophrenia

A significant need exists for new antipsychotic medications with different mechanisms of action, greater efficacy, and better tolerability than existing agents. Xanomeline is a dual M1/M4 preferring muscarinic receptor agonist with no direct D2 dopamine receptor blocking activity. KarXT combines xanomeline with the peripheral muscarinic receptor antagonist trospium chloride with the goal of reducing adverse events due to xanomeline-related peripheral muscarinic receptor activation. In prior trials, xanomeline-trospium chloride was effective in reducing symptoms of psychosis and generally well tolerated in people with schizophrenia. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of xanomeline-trospium vs placebo in adults with schizophrenia. EMERGENT-3 (NCT04738123) was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 5-week trial of xanomeline-trospium in people with schizophrenia experiencing acute psychosis, conducted between April 1, 2021, and December 7, 2022, at 30 inpatient sites in the US and Ukraine. Data were analyzed from February to June 2023. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive xanomeline-trospium chloride (maximum dose xanomeline 125 mg/trospium 30 mg) or placebo for 5 weeks. The prespecified primary end point was change from baseline to week 5 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. Secondary outcome measures were change from baseline to week 5 in PANSS positive subscale score, PANSS negative subscale score, PANSS Marder negative factor score, Clinical Global Impression-Severity score, and proportion of participants with at least a 30% reduction in PANSS total score. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. A total of 256 participants (mean [SD] age, 43.1 [11.8] years; 191 men [74.6%]; 156 of 256 participants [60.9%] were Black or African American, 98 [38.3%] were White, and 1 [0.4%] was Asian) were randomized (125 in xanomeline-trospium group and 131 in placebo group). At week 5, xanomeline-trospium significantly reduced PANSS total score compared with placebo (xanomeline-trospium , -20.6; placebo, -12.2; least squares mean difference, -8.4; 95% CI, -12.4 to -4.3; P < .001; Cohen d effect size, 0.60). Discontinuation rates due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar between the xanomeline-trospium (8 participants [6.4%]) and placebo (7 participants [5.5%]) groups. The most common TEAEs in the xanomeline-trospium vs placebo group were nausea (24 participants [19.2%] vs 2 participants [1.6%]), dyspepsia (20 participants [16.0%] vs 2 participants [1.6%]), vomiting (20 participants [16.0%] vs 1 participant [0.8%]), and constipation (16 participants [12.8%] vs 5 participants [3.9%]). Measures of extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain, and somnolence were similar between treatment groups. Xanomeline-trospium was efficacious and well tolerated in people with schizophrenia experiencing acute psychosis. These findings, together with the previously reported and consistent results from the EMERGENT-1 and EMERGENT-2 trials, support the potential of xanomeline-trospium to be the first in a putative new class of antipsychotic medications without D2 dopamine receptor blocking activity. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04738123.

Comparative efficacy of different types of exercise modalities on psychiatric symptomatology in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review with network meta-analysis

This network meta-analysis investigated the effects of 8 types of physical exercises on treating positive symptoms, negative symptoms, general psychopathology, and the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score in patients with schizophrenia. The methods adhered to PRISMA guidelines and used the Cochrane risk of bias tool for quality assessment, and Stata software for data analysis. Data were sourced from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database up to August 15, 2023, following PICOS principles. A total of 25 studies including 1441 participants were analyzed. Results showed that resistance exercise seems to be effective for improving positive symptoms, while Yoga was more effective for negative symptoms. Low-intensity aerobic exercise was optimal for general psychopathology, and Yoga was effective in improving the PANSS total score. The study concluded that yoga and aerobic exercise demonstrated superior performance, but the impact of exercise on patients with schizophrenia is also influenced by individual factors and intervention dosages. Therefore, a pre-assessment of patients considering factors such as interests, hobbies, and physical capabilities is crucial for selecting appropriate exercise modalities.

Characteristics of patients with schizophrenia switching from oral antipsychotics to once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M): a systematic review

BackgroundThe utilization of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) in schizophrenia treatment has increased due to its enhanced adherence and convenience. However, there is limited evidence on patient characteristics that may influence treatment outcomes when switching from oral antipsychotics (OAPs) to PP1M therapy. This systematic review aims to identify such patient characteristics and explore potential beneficial factors to aid healthcare professionals in clinical practice.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to July 19, 2022. Studies related to patients with schizophrenia who had been previously treated with OAPs and switched to PP1M were identified and included. Outcomes included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, the clinical Global Impressions – Severity (CGI-S) score, the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) total score, and hospitalisation rate. Data were independently extracted and analysed. The results were presented through a narrative synthesis.ResultsEleven studies with a total of 4150 patients were included, identifying nine potential characteristics. The most commonly reported characteristics was patient’s prior treatment with OAPs, followed by the stage of disease, duration of illness (DI), ethnicity, reason for switching to PP1M, history of hospitalisation, time of start injection of PP1M, the PANSS and PSP total score at baseline. Patients in the acute stage, with a shorter DI, a less than 1-week time interval to PP1M injection, and a lower PANSS total score at baseline may have a trend on providing better improvements on PANSS total score. Acute stage and shorter DI also showed potential trends in reducing CGI-S score. Early initiation of PP1M, switching for reasons other than lack of efficacy, and a higher PSP score at baseline exhibited potential trends towards better PSP total score improvements.ConclusionOur findings may suggest that patients in acute stage, with a shorter duration of illness, with early initiation of PP1M injection, and lower PANSS or PSP scores may trend towards better clinical results when transitioning to PP1M from OAPs. Further research is necessary to validate these potential associations and identify any unexplored characteristics. Such investigations are crucial for providing comprehensive clinical recommendations and informing treatment strategies in this context.

Mismatch negativity in schizophrenia spectrum and bipolar disorders: Group and sex differences and associations with symptom severity.

Research increasingly implicates glutamatergic dysfunction in the pathophysiologies of psychotic disorders. Auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) is an electroencephalography (EEG) waveform linked to glutamatergic neurotransmission and is consistently attenuated in schizophrenia (SCZ). MMN consists of two subcomponents, the repetition positivity (RP) and deviant negativity (DN) possibly reflecting different neural mechanisms. However, whether MMN reduction is present across different psychotic disorders, linked to distinct symptom clusters, or related to sex remain to be clarified. Four hundred participants including healthy controls (HCs; n=296) and individuals with SCZ (n=39), bipolar disorder (BD) BD typeI (n=35), or BD type II (n=30) underwent a roving MMN paradigm and clinical evaluation. MMN, RP and DN as well their memory traces were recorded at the FCZ electrode. Analyses of variance and linear regression models were used both transdiagnostically and within clinical groups. MMN was reduced in SCZ compared to BD (p=0.006, d=0.55) and to HCs (p<0.001, d=0.63). There was a significant group×sex interaction (p<0.003) and the MMN impairment was only detected in males with SCZ. MMN amplitude correlated positively with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score and negatively with Global Assessment of Functioning Scale score. The deviant negativity was impaired in males with SCZ. No group differences in memory trace indices of the MMN, DN, or RP. MMN was attenuated in SCZ and correlated with greater severity of psychotic symptoms and lower level of functioning. Our results may indicate sex-dependent differences of glutamatergic function in SCZ.

Efficacy and safety of blonanserin versus risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of blonanserin and risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia and to provide reliable pharmacotherapeutic evidence for in the clinical treatment of schizophrenia.MethodsWe systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases for head-to-head randomized controlled trials that compared blonanserin with risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia. We extracted the following data: author, year, country, diagnostic criteria, sample size, course of treatment, dosage and outcomes. Our main endpoint was the changes in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores. Meta-analysis of the included data was conducted by RevMan 5.3 software. We used the GRADE criteria to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.ResultsA total of 411 studies were initially; 8 trials were eligible and were included in our analysis (N = 1386 participants). Regarding efficacy, there was no difference in changes in the PANSS total scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). In terms of safety, compared to risperidone, the incidence of serum prolactin increases and weight gain in the blonanserin group was lower (P<0.05), but the incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) was higher (P<0.05).ConclusionThe efficacy of blonanserin is similar to that of risperidone, but it is unclear whether blonanserin is more effective than risperidone at improving cognitive and social function. More high-quality studies are needed to verify the efficacy and safety of blonanserin in the future.

Effectiveness and Safety of Switching from Oral Antipsychotics to Once-Monthly Paliperidone Palmitate (PP1M) in the Management of Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Considering the improvement in adherence and convenience, once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) has been increasingly used in the treatment of schizophrenia. However, the outcomes for patients who switch from oral antipsychotics (OAPs) to PP1M have not been reliably assessed. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of PP1M in the management of patients with schizophrenia with a prior history of OAP use. We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library on 19 July 2022 to identify eligible studies. All studies that examined the effectiveness and safety of switching from OAPs to PP1M in patients with schizophrenia were included. The primary outcomes were relapse rate, hospitalisation rate, and the change from baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. The secondary outcomes included the changed number of inpatient visits, changed length of stay hospitalisation, change from baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score and the personal and social performance (PSP) total score, response rate, proportion of treatment discontinuation, and adverse events. We included randomised-controlled trials (RCTs), single-arm studies, and observational studies. Case reports, case series, and reviews were excluded. The quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB2), the 9-point Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) instrument for non-randomised studies and cohort studies, and the 12-item National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for before-after (Pre-Post) study without control group. Follow-up times were reported as short- (≤ 13 weeks), medium- (14-26 weeks), and long term (≥ 27 weeks). Data were pooled using meta-analysis. Fifteen studies with a total of 4740 patients were included. The long-term relapse rates and hospitalisation rates were 12% (95% CI 0.07-0.18) and 18% (95% CI 0.15-0.20), respectively. The short-, medium-, and long-term change in PANSS total score was - 21.69 (95% CI - 30.02 to -13.36), - 14.98 (95% CI - 21.45 to - 8.51) and - 17.88 (95% CI - 31.94 to -3.82), respectively. Approximately 50% of patients reported at least a 30% reduction in the PANSS score at the short-term follow-up. Improvements in CGI-S and PSP score were observed during various periods. There was a reduction in the length of stay hospitalisation and the number of inpatient visits at the medium- and long-term follow-ups. Low discontinuation and adverse event rates were reported. Based on our findings, this study may support the efficacy and safety of switching from OAPs to PP1M for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Future large-scale studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Paliperidone 6-month Formulation: An Open-label 2-year Extension of a 1-year Double-blind Study in Adult Participants With Schizophrenia.

Paliperidone palmitate 6-month (PP6M) demonstrated noninferiority to paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) in preventing relapse in patients with schizophrenia in a phase-3 double-blind (DB) study (NCT03345342). Here, we report long-term efficacy and safety results from a 2-year single-arm, open-label extension (OLE; NCT04072575) of this DB study. Participants who completed the DB study without relapse were enrolled and followed-up every 3 months up to 2 years. Participants received 4 PP6M gluteal-injections (700/1000mg eq.) at baseline, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month visits. Efficacy endpoints included assessment of relapse, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, Personal and Social Performance (PSP) score, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale change from baseline. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), physical examinations, and laboratory tests. Of 178 participants enrolled, 154 (86.5%) completed the OLE; mean age: 40.4 years, men: 70.8%. Mean duration of PP6M exposure during OLE was 682.1 days. Overall, 7/178 (3.9%) participants relapsed between 20-703 days after enrolment. Mean (SD) change from baseline to endpoint: PANSS total score, 0.7 (8.22); CGI-S, 0.0 (0.51); PSP Scale, 0.5 (7.47). Overall, 111/178 participants (62.4%) reported ≥1 TEAE; most common (>5%) TEAEs were headaches (13.5%) and increased blood prolactin/hyperprolactinemia (18.0%); 8/178 (4.5%) participants experienced serious TEAEs, and 6/178 (3.4%) participants withdrew due to TEAEs; no deaths were reported. The relapse rate observed with PP6M during the 2-year OLE was low (3.9%). Clinical and functional improvements demonstrated in the DB study were maintained during OLE and no new safety concerns were identified.

Body mass index, waist circumference, insulin, and leptin plasma levels differentiate between clozapine-responsive and clozapine-resistant schizophrenia.

Between 25% and 50% of patients suffering from treatment-resistant schizophrenia fail to achieve a clinical response with clozapine. The rapid identification and treatment of this subgroup of patients represents a challenge for healthcare practice. To evaluate the relationship between metabolic alterations and the clinical response to clozapine. A multicenter, observational, case-control study was performed. Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia treated with clozapine were eligible (minimum dose 400 mg/d for at least 8 weeks and/or clozapine plasma levels ⩾ 350 µg/mL). According to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, patients were classified as clozapine-responsive (CR) (<80 points) or clozapine non-responsive (CNR) (⩾80 points). Groups were compared based on demographic and treatment-related characteristics, together with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, insulin, leptin, and C-reactive protein plasma levels. Plasma levels of clozapine and its main metabolite, nor-clozapine, were measured in all the participants. In addition, the potential relationship between PANSS scores and leptin or insulin plasma levels was assessed. A total of 46 patients were included: 25 CR and 21 CNR. BMI and waist circumference, fasting insulin and leptin plasma levels were lower in the CNR group, while C-reactive protein was not different. Moreover, significant negative correlations were observed between PANSS positive and general psychopathology subscores, on one hand, and insulin and leptin plasma levels, on the other hand, as well as between PANSS negative subscores and leptin plasma levels. Our results suggest that the lack of metabolic effect induced by clozapine is associated with the lack of clinical response.

Synaptic Terminal Density Early in the Course of Schizophrenia: An In Vivo UCB-J Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging Study of SV2A

BackgroundThe synaptic hypothesis is an influential theory of the pathoetiology of schizophrenia (SCZ), which is supported by the finding that there is lower uptake of the synaptic terminal density marker [11C]UCB-J in patients with chronic SCZ than in control participants. However, it is unclear whether these differences are present early in the illness. To address this, we investigated [11C]UCB-J volume of distribution (VT) in antipsychotic-naïve/free patients with SCZ who were recruited from first-episode services compared with healthy volunteers. MethodsForty-two volunteers (SCZ n = 21, healthy volunteers n = 21) underwent [11C]UCB-J positron emission tomography to index [11C]UCB-J VT and distribution volume ratio in the anterior cingulate, frontal, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices; the temporal, parietal and occipital lobes; and the hippocampus, thalamus, and amygdala. Symptom severity was assessed in the SCZ group using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. ResultsWe found no significant effects of group on [11C]UCB-J VT or distribution volume ratio in most regions of interest (effect sizes from d = 0.0–0.7, p > .05), with two exceptions: we found lower distribution volume ratio in the temporal lobe (d = 0.7, uncorrected p < .05) and lower VT/fp in the anterior cingulate cortex in patients (d = 0.7, uncorrected p < .05). The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score was negatively associated with [11C]UCB-J VT in the hippocampus in the SCZ group (r = −0.48, p = .03). ConclusionsThese findings indicate that large differences in synaptic terminal density are not present early in SCZ, although there may be more subtle effects. When taken together with previous evidence of lower [11C]UCB-J VT in patients with chronic illness, this may indicate synaptic density changes during the course of SCZ.

Ulotaront: review of preliminary evidence for the efficacy and safety of a TAAR1 agonist in schizophrenia.

Ulotaront is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist in Phase 3 clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. Ulotaront was discovered through a unique, target-agnostic approach optimized to identify drug candidates lacking D2 and 5-HT2A receptor antagonism, while demonstrating an antipsychotic-like phenotypic profile in vivo. The mechanism of action (MOA) of ulotaront is thought to be mediated by agonism at TAAR1 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors. Ulotaront has completed two Phase 2 trials (4-week acute study and 26-week open-label extension) which led to Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of schizophrenia. In the double-blind, placebo-controlled, acute study, ulotaront was associated with significant (p < 0.001) improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (effect size [ES]: 0.45), with improvements vs. placebo also observed across secondary endpoints. Post-hoc analyses of the acute trial revealed additional evidence to support the effect of ulotaront on negative symptoms. In the 4-week study, ulotaront was well-tolerated, with an incidence of adverse events (AEs) numerically lower compared to placebo (45.8% vs. 50.4%; with a number needed to harm [NNH] for individual ulotaront AEs all > 40). The open-label extension demonstrated further improvement across schizophrenia symptoms and confirmed the tolerability of ulotaront, with a 6-month completion rate of 67%. Based on current data, ulotaront shows potential to be a first-in-class TAAR1 agonist for the treatment of schizophrenia with a safety and efficacy profile distinct from current antipsychotics.

Sleep Problems, Suicidal Ideation, and Psychopathology in First-Episode Psychosis.

Insomnia occurs frequently in the clinical course of schizophrenia. A growing literature has found associations between insomnia, suicidal ideation and behavior, and psychopathology in schizophrenia. We explored associations between sleep problems, suicidal ideation, and psychopathology in a cohort of patients with first-episode psychosis. We performed a secondary analysis of data for n = 403 subjects with data from the Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode study using regression models. The prevalence of sleep problems and suicidal ideation at baseline was 57% and 15%, respectively. After controlling for potential confounders, in the study baseline sleep problems were associated with increased odds of suicidal ideation with evidence of a dose-dependent relationship (OR = 2.25, 95% CI 1.15-4.41, P = .018). Over 24 months, sleep problems at any time point were associated with an over 3-fold increased odds of concurrent suicidal ideation (OR = 3.21, 95% CI 1.45-7.14, P = .004). Subjects with persistent sleep problems were almost 14 times more likely to endorse suicidal ideation at least once over the study than those without sleep problems (OR = 13.8, 95% CI 6.5-53.4, P < .001). Sleep problems were also a predictor of higher Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total (β = 0.13-0.22), positive (β = 0.14-0.25), and general (β = 0.16-0.27) subscale scores at baseline and multiple follow-up visits (P < .01 for each). Sleep problems are highly prevalent and associated with suicidal ideation and greater psychopathology in first-episode psychosis. Formal assessment and treatment of insomnia appear relevant to the clinical care of patients with psychosis as a predictor of suicidal ideation and symptom severity.

Paliperidone Palmitate versus Risperidone Long-Acting Injectable in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of paliperidone palmitate (PP) treatment compared with risperidone long-acting injectable (LAI) treatments for patients with schizophrenia. Data mining was conducted in April 2022 across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and PsycINFO. All published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effect of PP treatment for patients with schizophrenia when compared with the risperidone-LAIAs group were included. Relevant data were extracted and synthesized narratively. Results were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) or risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Four RCTs with 2451 patients met all the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Efficacy analyses showed no significant statistical differences in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score changes at the endpoint (SMD = 0.10, P = 0.19), or in response rates (RR = 0.93; P = 0.40). Regarding the safety outcomes, PP treatment showed significantly increased risks of discontinuation rates for any reason (35.7% vs 30.4%; RR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.39; P = 0.02) and nonsignificantly increased risks of total treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (66.6% vs.64.8%; RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.09; P = 0.78) compared with the risperidone-LAIAs-treated group. Furthermore, PP may significantly increase total discontinuation rates compared with risperidone-LAIAs. Our meta-analysis did not find a more beneficial effect of PP compared to risperidone-LAIAs treatments for schizophrenia. Clinicians should interpret and translate our data with caution, as the meta-analysis was based on a limited number of randomized controlled trials and patients.

Factor Analysis Investigating the Efficacy of HP-3070 Transdermal System in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Five Adults With Schizophrenia

AbstractIntroductionHP-3070, a once-daily asenapine transdermal system, is FDA-approved for adults with schizophrenia. In a pivotal phase 3 randomized controlled study, patients with schizophrenia who were treated once daily with HP-3070 demonstrated significant improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores compared with placebo. The PANSS score’s five-factor structure can also assess treatment efficacy across different domains. This post-hoc analysis of the pivotal study evaluated the efficacy of HP-3070 by examining these domains.MethodsIn the pivotal phase 3 study, adults with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia were randomized to 6 weeks of treatment with HP-3070 3.8mg/24h, 7.6mg/24h, or placebo. Factor analysis of PANSS scores was performed using five domains (negative symptoms, positive symptoms, disorganized thought, uncontrolled hostility/excitement, anxiety/depression). Mixed-model repeated-measures (MMRM) analysis included change from baseline in PANSS factor score as the repeated dependent variable, with country, treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, and baseline PANSS score as covariates.ResultsThe analysis included 607 patients. Least-squares mean estimates (standard error) of the difference from placebo in change from baseline to Week 6 for each factor were as follows: negative symptoms, 3.8mg/24h, -0.9 (0.43), P=0.045, and 7.6mg/24h, -0.4 (0.43), P=0.41; positive symptoms, 3.8mg/24h, -2.3 (0.57), P&lt;0.001, and 7.6mg/24h, -2.0 (0.57), P&lt;0.001; disorganized thought, 3.8mg/24h, -1.5 (0.38), P&lt;0.001, and 7.6mg/24h, -0.9 (0.38), P=0.03; uncontrolled hostility/excitement: 3.8mg/24h, -1.1 (0.30), P&lt;0.001, and 7.6mg/24h -0.9 (0.30), P=0.002; anxiety/depression, 3.8mg/24h, -0.5 (0.31), P=0.14, and 7.6mg/24h, -0.6 (0.31), P=0.07.ConclusionsHP-3070 demonstrated treatment effects on a PANSS five-factor model, with the results indicating impact on negative symptoms, positive symptoms, disorganized thought, uncontrolled hostility/excitement, and anxiety/depression. These findings suggest that HP-3070 may address a broad range of symptoms in schizophrenia.FundingNoven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical, Co.

Safety and efficacy of KarXT (Xanomeline Trospium) in Schizophrenia in the Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled EMERGENT-2 Trial

AbstractIntroductionKarXT combines the M1/M4 preferring muscarinic receptor agonist xanomeline and the peripherally restricted anticholinergic trospium. In the phase 2 EMERGENT-1 study, KarXT met the primary endpoint of a significant reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score through week 5 vs placebo, improved other key secondary efficacy measures, and was generally well tolerated.MethodsEMERGENT-2 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 5-week trial of KarXT in acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia in the inpatient setting. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to KarXT or matched placebo. Dosing of KarXT (mg xanomeline/mg trospium) started at 50 mg/20 mg BID and increased to a maximum of 125 mg/30 mg BID. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 5 in PANSS total score. Key secondary endpoints included change from baseline to week 5 in PANSS positive subscale, PANSS negative subscale, and PANSS negative Marder factor scores compared with placebo. Efficacy analyses were performed using the modified intent-to-treat population (patients with ≥1 dose of study medication, a baseline PANSS assessment, and ≥1 postbaseline PANSS assessment). All patients receiving ≥1 dose of study drug were included in safety analyses.Results252 US patients were enrolled. KarXT demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful 9.6-point reduction from baseline to week 5 (effect size=0.61) in PANSS total score vs placebo (p&lt;0.0001); a significant improvement in PANSS total score was demonstrated starting at week 2 (first postbaseline rating) and continued through the study end. KarXT also met key secondary endpoints. Results at week 5 included a 2.9-point reduction in PANSS positive subscale score with KarXT vs placebo (p&lt;0.0001), a 1.8-point reduction in PANSS negative subscale score with KarXT vs placebo (p=0.0055), and a 2.2-point reduction in PANSS negative Marder factor score with KarXT vs placebo (p=0.0022). KarXT was generally well tolerated. Overall discontinuation rates were similar with KarXT (25%) and placebo (21%). The overall treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) rate for KarXT and placebo was 75% and 58%, respectively. Discontinuation rates related to TEAEs were similar between KarXT (7%) and placebo (6%). Rates of serious TEAEs were similar with KarXT and placebo (2%, each group); no serious TEAEs were determined to be drug related. The most common TEAEs (≥5%) with KarXT were all mild to moderate in severity and included constipation, dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, headache, blood pressure increases, dizziness, gastroesophageal reflux disease, abdominal discomfort, and diarrhea. KarXT was not associated with sedation/somnolence, weight gain, and extrapyramidal symptoms.ConclusionsKarXT has the potential to be the first in a new class of treatments for patients with schizophrenia and a promising alternative to postsynaptic dopamine D2 receptor antagonists.FundingKaruna Therapeutics, Inc.

Combining Iclepertin (BI 425809) With Computerized Cognitive Training in Patients With Schizophrenia: Baseline Data From an Ongoing Phase II Trial

AbstractIntroductionThere are currently no approved pharmacotherapies to treat cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS). Iclepertin (BI 425809) is a novel glycine transporter-1 inhibitor under development for treatment of CIAS. A previous study demonstrated pro-cognitive effects of iclepertin in patients with schizophrenia; however, concurrent cognitive stimulation could in theory enhance any pro-cognitive pharmacological effects on neuroplasticity. We present preliminary demographics and baseline data from a trial exploring the efficacy of iclepertin together with at-home computerized cognitive training (CCT).MethodsThis is an ongoing Phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial in patients with schizophrenia on stable antipsychotic therapy across ~58 centers in 6 countries. Patients aged 18–50 years, compliant with CCT during the run-in period (completing ≥2 hours/week for 2 weeks), were randomized (1:1) to receive once-daily iclepertin 10 mg or placebo together with CCT for 12 weeks. Thereafter, minimum compliance for at-home CCT is 1 hour/week, with a target of ~30 hours across 3–5 sessions totaling 2.5 hours/week. Patients have been stratified to balance potential effects of age (18–40; 41–50 years). Primary endpoint is change from baseline (CfB) in neurocognitive composite T-score of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) at Week 12. Secondary endpoints include CfB in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) total score, MCCB overall composite T-score, and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores. Novel exploratory endpoints include the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool to assess daily functioning and the Balloon Effort Task to assess motivation in cognitive performance.ResultsOf the planned sample of 200 randomized patients, the overall treated population currently includes 183: 67% (n=122) are male; mean (standard deviation [SD]) age and time since first diagnosis are 38.2 (7.9) years and 13.5 (8.5) years. Overall, 49% (n=89) are White and 43% (n=79) are Black or African American; 80% (n=147) are from North America, 15% (n=28) from Europe, and 4% (n=8) from Australia/New Zealand. Mean (SD) baseline MCCB neurocognitive composite and overall T-scores (n=178) are 33.7 (11.9) and 32.5 (12.6). Mean (SD) baseline SCoRS total score (n=167) is 35.2 (8.7). Mean (SD) baseline PANSS total and negative symptom scale scores (n=183) are 64.7 (14.6) and 17.3 (5.4). Median (Q1, Q3) CCT compliance over the on-treatment period for patients who have completed or discontinued early is 2.00 (1.21, 2.51) hours/week.ConclusionThis trial is, to our knowledge, the largest of its kind combining daily pharmacotherapy for CIAS with at-home CCT. It will indicate whether iclepertin together with concurrent cognitive stimulation provides enhanced cognitive benefit, and whether any improvements in neurocognition can translate into improved measures of daily functioning in patients.FundingBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH (NCT03859973/1346-0038)

Cannabis Use and Symptomatic Relapse in First Episode Schizophrenia: Trigger or Consequence? Data From the OPTIMISE Study.

This analysis examined the relationship between cannabis use, compliance with antipsychotics and risk for relapse in patients in remission following a first episode of schizophrenia, schizophreniform, or schizoaffective disorder. Analyses were performed on data from a large European study on first episode of schizophrenia, schizophreniform, or schizoaffective disorder (OPTiMiSE). After 10 weeks of antipsychotic treatment, 282/446 patients (63%) met criteria for symptomatic remission; of whom 134/282 (47.5%) then completed a 1-year follow-up. Cross-lagged models and mediation models investigated the temporal relationships between cannabis use, compliance with antipsychotics, social functioning, and symptomatic worsening/relapse. Compared to nonusers, cannabis use increased risk for relapse, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 3.03 (SE = 0.32), P < .001, even in patients who were compliant with antipsychotic medication, adjusted HR = 2.89, (SE = 0.32), P < .001. Cannabis use preceded symptomatic worsening and was followed by worsening of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score at the 1-year end-point (standardized β = 0.62, SE = 0.19, P = .001) and by worsening of social functioning (coef = -0.66, P ≤ .001). In patients in remission from their first episode of schizophrenia, schizophreniform, or schizoaffective disorder, cannabis use increases the rate of relapse in both compliant and noncompliant individuals. Importantly, the temporal relationship between cannabis and relapse was that cannabis use preceded later relapse, noncompliance, and decrease in social functioning, and not that patients began to relapse, then used cannabis. Further research with a precision psychiatry approach might identify those patients in particular danger of relapse when using cannabis.

Long-term efficacy and safety of paliperidone 6-month formulation: An open-label extension of a double-blind study in adult patients with schizophrenia

IntroductionPaliperidone palmitate 6-month (PP6M), administered twice-yearly, demonstrated non-inferiority to paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) in preventing relapse in patients with schizophrenia in a phase-3 randomized, double-blind (DB) global study.1 We report results of a 2-year single-arm, open-label extension (OLE) of this study (NCT04072575).ObjectivesTo assess long-term efficacy and safety of PP6M in patients with schizophrenia.MethodsPatients who completed DB study without relapse were enrolled and followed up every 3 months for up to 2 years. Patients received 4 PP6M injections (700/1000 mg eq.) at baseline, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month visits. Efficacy endpoints included relapse rate, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, Personal and Social Performance (PSP) score, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale change from baseline. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), physical examinations and laboratory tests.ResultsOf 178 patients, 154 (86.5%) completed the study; mean age: 40.4 years; 70.8% were men. Mean duration of PP6M exposure was 682.1 days. Overall, 7/178 (3.9%) patients relapsed between 20 to 703 days after enrolment. Mean (SD) change from baseline to endpoint: PANSS total score, 0.7 (8.22); CGI-S, 0.0 (0.51); PSP Scale, 0.5 (7.47). Overall, 111/178 patients (62.4%) reported ≥1 TEAE; most common (&gt;10%) TEAEs were headache (13.5%) and blood prolactin increased (10.7%). Total, 7/24 patients withdrew due to TEAEs, and 8/178 (4.5%) patients experienced serious TEAEs; no deaths were reported.ConclusionsRelapse rate with PP6M was very low (&lt;4%). Clinical improvements in PANSS, CGI-S, and PSP scales demonstrated in DB study were maintained during this 2-year OLE study and no new safety concerns were identified.Reference1. D. Najarian et al. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2022 Mar 17;25(3):238-251.Disclosure of InterestD. Najarian Shareolder of: Johnson &amp; Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research &amp; Development, LLC, I. Turkoz Shareolder of: Johnson &amp; Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research &amp; Development, LLC, S. Galderisi Consultant of: Janssen, Gedeon Richter-Recordati, Angelini, Speakers bureau of: Angelini, Gedeon Richter-Recordati, Janssen, Lundbeck, Sunovion, Recordati, H. Lamaison Grant / Research support from: Novartis, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Servier, AstraZeneca, Wyeth, Pfizer, Otsuka, Takeda, Sunovion, Roche, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Speakers bureau of: Servier, Abbot, Raymonds, Raffo, Temis Lostalo and Janssen Pharmaceutical, P. Zalitacz: None Declared, S. Aravind Shareolder of: Johnson &amp; Johnson, Employee of: Advarra, Inc. USA, U. Richarz Shareolder of: Johnson &amp; Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research &amp; Development-Cilag, Switzerland.

Relapse in patients with schizophrenia and amisulpride-induced hyperprolactinemia or olanzapine-induced metabolic disturbance after switching to other antipsychotics

Hyperprolactinemia and metabolic disturbance are common side effects of antipsychotics that cause intolerance. Despite its potential influence on relapse, there are no established guidelines for antipsychotic switching. This naturalistic study explored the association between antipsychotic switching, baseline clinical status, metabolic changes, and relapse in patients with schizophrenia. In total, 177 patients with amisulpride-induced hyperprolactinemia and 274 with olanzapine-induced metabolic disturbance were enrolled. Relapse was determined by assessing changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores from baseline to 6 months (increased over 20% or 10% reaching 70). Metabolic indices were measured at baseline and 3 months. Patients with baseline PANSS >60 were more likely to relapse. Further, patients switching to aripiprazole had a higher risk of relapse regardless of their original medication. Participants who originally used amisulpride had reduced prolactin levels following medication change, while switching to olanzapine caused increased weight and blood glucose levels. In patients originally using olanzapine, only switching to aripiprazole reduced insulin resistance. Adverse effects on weight and lipid metabolism were observed in patients who switched to risperidone, while amisulpride improved lipid profiles. Changing schizophrenia treatment requires careful consideration of multiple variables, particularly the choice of substituted drug and the patient's baseline symptoms.

Beyond antipsychotics: the role of medication and nonmedication factors in female sexual dysfunctions in schizophrenia.

To date, few studies have investigated male sexual dysfunctions (FSDs) in schizophrenia in non-Western countries, with most studies focusing on the sexual side effects of antipsychotic medications. Therefore, we aimed to screen for FSD in a sample of Egyptian females with schizophrenia, compare them to controls and to investigate demographic and clinical parameters associated with FSD. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 72 medicated and unmedicated females with schizophrenia (27 unmedicated and 45 medicated) and 24 controls. They were assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and data were collected for demographic and clinical parameters. We found that females with schizophrenia had significantly lower scores on the FSFI compared to controls and that 93.1% of females with schizophrenia reached the threshold for FSD (FSFI score ≤26), compared to 87.5% of controls. Medicated and unmedicated subjects did not differ significantly in most domains of the FSFI. Age, duration of illness, positive and negative syndrome Scale total, positive and negative symptom scores correlated significantly with the majority of domains of the FSFI. Rates of FSD are very high in both schizophrenia and controls and correlate in schizophrenia with a number of demographic and clinical parameters, suggesting that FSDs are not restricted to the side effects of medications. There is a need to screen for sexual function in routine practice, and for developing active strategies to tackle sexual dysfunctions.