Negative Syndrome Scale Total Score Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of a Chinese medicine formula Diankuang Mengxing Decoction combined with antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

In patients with schizophrenia, Diankuang Mengxing Decoction with antipsychotics is one of the treatments for it. However, little information is available regarding the difference between the therapeutic effect of Diankuang Mengxing Decoction with antipsychotics and other treatments. Systematic evaluation is conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of Diankuang Mengxing Decoction and other antipsychotics, which are used to treat schizophrenia. We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023414603). This entailed a computerized search of several research databases from their respective dates of establishment until April 11, 2023, which collected clinical randomized controlled trials of Diankuang Mengxing Decoction combined with antipsychotics. The databases that contributed to this study were PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCOhost, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Each publication was screened according to defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and appropriate literature was extracted and evaluated for quality, for which meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. A literature review of 456 publications resulted in the inclusion of 18 randomized controlled trials with data collected from a total of 1636 patients. Meta-analytical results showed combination with risperidone, olanzapine, chlorpromazine, clozapine, ziprasidone, or aripiprazole increased the overall effectiveness of Diankuang Mengxing Decoction when treating schizophrenia (P < . 00001), among whom olanzapine demonstrated the greatest enhancement (Z = 3.65, odds ratio = 4.26, 95% CI: 1.96-9.28, P = .0003). The 4-week/30-day treatment (P = .0003) and a dosage of 400 mL/d of Diankuang Mengxing Decoction (P = .0004) were more effective. Also, there were widespread reductions to the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores, PANSS-positive symptom scores, PANSS-negative symptom scores, general psychopathology scores (P < .05 for all), as well as the incidence of adverse effects (Z = 2.79, odds ratio = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16-0.73, P = .005) in patients with schizophrenia. The combination of Diankuang Mengxing Decoction with different antipsychotics can improve the overall prognosis of patients with schizophrenia; Diankuang Mengxing Decoction combined olanzapine, a dosage of 400 mL/d and a duration of 4 weeks/30 days being the best in this regard, by alleviating the symptoms and diminishing the disorder's adverse effects. To build on this work, more large-sample, multi-center, and high-quality clinical studies in the future would help to further validate our findings.

Efficacy and Safety of Lurasidone vs. Quetiapine XR in Acutely Psychotic Patients With Schizophrenia in Korea: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Trial.

This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (160 mg/day) compared to quetiapine XR (QXR; 600 mg/day) in the treatment of acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia. Patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with lurasidone 160 mg/day (n=105) or QXR 600 mg/day (n=105). Primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score. Adverse events, body measurements, and laboratory parameters were assessed. Lurasidone demonstrated non-inferiority to QXR on the PANSS total score. Adjusted mean±standard error change at week 6 on the PANSS total score was -26.42±2.02 and -27.33±2.01 in the lurasidone and QXR group, respectively. The mean difference score was -0.91 (95% confidence interval -6.35-4.53). The lurasidone group showed a greater reduction in PANSS total and negative subscale on week 1 and a greater reduction in end-point CGI-S score compared to the QXR group. Body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference in the lurasidone group were reduced, with significantly lower mean change compared to QXR. Endpoint changes in glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein levels were also significantly lower. The most common adverse drug reactions with lurasidone were akathisia and nausea. Lurasidone 160 mg/day was found to be non-inferior to QXR 600 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia with comparable efficacy and tolerability. Adverse effects of lurasidone were generally tolerable, and beneficial effects on metabolic parameters can be expected.

Exposure-Response Modeling in Adults and Adolescents With Schizophrenia to Support the Extrapolation of Brexpiprazole Efficacy to Adolescents.

In order to accelerate drug development and avoid unnecessary drug trials in vulnerable pediatric populations, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a general advice letter to sponsors permitting the effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults to be extrapolated to adolescents. Extrapolation is based on the evidence-based assumptions that (1) disease characteristics and (2) response to therapy, are similar in adults and adolescents. Whereas the FDA validated the extrapolation approach using data from multiple drug development programs, aripiprazole data are the most relevant to confirm the validity of the extrapolation approach for brexpiprazole, since aripiprazole and brexpiprazole both modulate dopaminergic and serotonergic signaling in the brain. The aims of this analysis were (1) to quantitatively assess the aripiprazole exposure (average steady-state concentration)-response (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score change from baseline) similarity between adults and adolescents with schizophrenia, (2) to extend the aripiprazole exposure-response modeling to brexpiprazole using adult data, and (3) to use the brexpiprazole model to predict schizophrenia symptom response in adolescents. Disease-drug-dropout models were developed using patient-level data from clinical studies of aripiprazole (1007 adults, 294 adolescents) and brexpiprazole (1235 adults) in schizophrenia. The aripiprazole model demonstrated similar exposure-response between adults and adolescents with schizophrenia, validating the extrapolation approach. Extrapolation of the brexpiprazole adult exposure-response model to adolescents predicted the efficacy of brexpiprazole in adolescents aged 13-17 years with schizophrenia.

Current Findings and Potential Mechanisms of KarXT (Xanomeline-Trospium) in Schizophrenia Treatment.

Standard schizophrenia treatment involves antipsychotic medications that target D2 dopamine receptors. However, these drugs have limitations in addressing all symptoms and can lead to adverse effects such as motor impairments, metabolic effects, sedation, sexual dysfunction, cognitive impairment, and tardive dyskinesia. Recently, KarXT has emerged as a novel drug for schizophrenia. KarXT combines xanomeline, a muscarinic receptor M1 and M4 agonist, with trospium, a nonselective antimuscarinic agent. Of note, xanomeline can readily cross blood-brain barrier (BBB) and, thus, enter into the brain, thereby stimulating muscarinic receptors (M1 and M4). By doing so, xanomeline has been shown to target negative symptoms and potentially improve positive symptoms. Trospium, on the other hand, is not able to cross BBB, thereby not affecting M1 and M4 receptors; instead, it acts as an antimuscarinic agent and, hence, diminishes peripheral activity of muscarinic receptors to minimize side effects probably stemming from xanomeline in other organs. Accordingly, ongoing clinical trials investigating KarXT's efficacy in schizophrenia have demonstrated positive outcomes, including significant improvements in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and cognitive function compared with placebo. These findings emphasize the potential of KarXT as a promising treatment for schizophrenia, providing symptom relief while minimizing side effects associated with xanomeline monotherapy. Despite such promising evidence, further research is needed to confirm the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of KarXT in managing schizophrenia. This review article explores the current findings and potential mechanisms of KarXT in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Efficacy and Safety of Xanomeline-Trospium Chloride in Schizophrenia

A significant need exists for new antipsychotic medications with different mechanisms of action, greater efficacy, and better tolerability than existing agents. Xanomeline is a dual M1/M4 preferring muscarinic receptor agonist with no direct D2 dopamine receptor blocking activity. KarXT combines xanomeline with the peripheral muscarinic receptor antagonist trospium chloride with the goal of reducing adverse events due to xanomeline-related peripheral muscarinic receptor activation. In prior trials, xanomeline-trospium chloride was effective in reducing symptoms of psychosis and generally well tolerated in people with schizophrenia. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of xanomeline-trospium vs placebo in adults with schizophrenia. EMERGENT-3 (NCT04738123) was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 5-week trial of xanomeline-trospium in people with schizophrenia experiencing acute psychosis, conducted between April 1, 2021, and December 7, 2022, at 30 inpatient sites in the US and Ukraine. Data were analyzed from February to June 2023. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive xanomeline-trospium chloride (maximum dose xanomeline 125 mg/trospium 30 mg) or placebo for 5 weeks. The prespecified primary end point was change from baseline to week 5 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. Secondary outcome measures were change from baseline to week 5 in PANSS positive subscale score, PANSS negative subscale score, PANSS Marder negative factor score, Clinical Global Impression-Severity score, and proportion of participants with at least a 30% reduction in PANSS total score. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. A total of 256 participants (mean [SD] age, 43.1 [11.8] years; 191 men [74.6%]; 156 of 256 participants [60.9%] were Black or African American, 98 [38.3%] were White, and 1 [0.4%] was Asian) were randomized (125 in xanomeline-trospium group and 131 in placebo group). At week 5, xanomeline-trospium significantly reduced PANSS total score compared with placebo (xanomeline-trospium , -20.6; placebo, -12.2; least squares mean difference, -8.4; 95% CI, -12.4 to -4.3; P < .001; Cohen d effect size, 0.60). Discontinuation rates due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar between the xanomeline-trospium (8 participants [6.4%]) and placebo (7 participants [5.5%]) groups. The most common TEAEs in the xanomeline-trospium vs placebo group were nausea (24 participants [19.2%] vs 2 participants [1.6%]), dyspepsia (20 participants [16.0%] vs 2 participants [1.6%]), vomiting (20 participants [16.0%] vs 1 participant [0.8%]), and constipation (16 participants [12.8%] vs 5 participants [3.9%]). Measures of extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain, and somnolence were similar between treatment groups. Xanomeline-trospium was efficacious and well tolerated in people with schizophrenia experiencing acute psychosis. These findings, together with the previously reported and consistent results from the EMERGENT-1 and EMERGENT-2 trials, support the potential of xanomeline-trospium to be the first in a putative new class of antipsychotic medications without D2 dopamine receptor blocking activity. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04738123.

Exploring Cariprazine’s Potential in Late-Stage Schizophrenia Treatment

IntroductionSchizophrenia is a chronic neuropsychiatric disorder that often requires long-term pharmacotherapy to manage symptoms and prevent relapse. There are important clinical differences between early-stage versus late-stage schizophrenia, like the predominant symptomatology. In later stages, negative, cognitive, and anxiety/depressive symptoms dominate the clinical picture, with relapses further potentiating the emergence of positive symptoms. Therefore, it is crucial to establish the efficacy of an antipsychotic medication in the later stages of schizophrenia as well. Cariprazine is a novel dopamine D3-preferring D3/D2 receptor partial agonist that has shown efficacy in treating schizophrenia across the symptom spectrum.ObjectivesThe aim of this poster is to present the findings of cariprazine’s efficacy in treating late-stage schizophrenia, especially in symptoms that are more commonly occurring in this phase of the disorder.MethodsThis poster reports the results of a post-hoc pooled analysis of three 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (NCT01104766, NCT01104779, NCT00694707) that assessed the efficacy of cariprazine in schizophrenia. The primary outcome was the change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Scores from baseline to endpoint. The analysis focused on patients with late-stage schizophrenia (defined as having an illness-duration of more than 15 years) who received cariprazine at doses between 1.5 mg/day to 6.0 mg/day. The changes in PANSS-derived Marder Factor Scores for Negative, Disorganised Thought (i.e., Cognitive) and Anxiety/Depression symptoms were further examined. The least square mean differences (LSMDs) between cariprazine and placebo groups were calculated using mixed-models for repeated measures (MMRM).ResultsAltogether, 128 placebo-, and 286 cariprazine-treated patients were identified as having schizophrenia for more than 15 years. The mean age of patients was about 45 years, while the mean illness-duration was about 24 years. The mean baseline PANSS scores were the same between the two groups. In the late-stage schizophrenia population, at Week 6, cariprazine yielded statistically significantly greater reductions on the PANSS Total Score (LSMD -6.7, p&lt;0.01). Cariprazine further showed superiority over placebo in reducing negative (LSMD -1.4, p&lt;0.05), disorganised thought (LSMD -1.3, p&lt;0.01), and anxiety/depression (LSMD -0.9, p&lt;0.05) symptoms.ConclusionsCariprazine showed efficacy in treating patients with late-stage schizophrenia. It improved overall schizophrenia symptoms, as well as the negative, cognitive and anxiety/depression symptoms that are more prevalent in this phase of the disorder.Disclosure of InterestP. Falkai Consultant of: Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Lundbeck, Speakers bureau of: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Essex, GE Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, Gedeon Richter, Janssen Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Servier, and Takeda, R. Csehi Employee of: Gedeon Richter Plc, K. Acsai Employee of: Gedeon Richter Plc, G. Németh Employee of: Gedeon Richter Plc

Comparative efficacy of different types of exercise modalities on psychiatric symptomatology in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review with network meta-analysis

This network meta-analysis investigated the effects of 8 types of physical exercises on treating positive symptoms, negative symptoms, general psychopathology, and the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score in patients with schizophrenia. The methods adhered to PRISMA guidelines and used the Cochrane risk of bias tool for quality assessment, and Stata software for data analysis. Data were sourced from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database up to August 15, 2023, following PICOS principles. A total of 25 studies including 1441 participants were analyzed. Results showed that resistance exercise seems to be effective for improving positive symptoms, while Yoga was more effective for negative symptoms. Low-intensity aerobic exercise was optimal for general psychopathology, and Yoga was effective in improving the PANSS total score. The study concluded that yoga and aerobic exercise demonstrated superior performance, but the impact of exercise on patients with schizophrenia is also influenced by individual factors and intervention dosages. Therefore, a pre-assessment of patients considering factors such as interests, hobbies, and physical capabilities is crucial for selecting appropriate exercise modalities.

Characteristics of patients with schizophrenia switching from oral antipsychotics to once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M): a systematic review

BackgroundThe utilization of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) in schizophrenia treatment has increased due to its enhanced adherence and convenience. However, there is limited evidence on patient characteristics that may influence treatment outcomes when switching from oral antipsychotics (OAPs) to PP1M therapy. This systematic review aims to identify such patient characteristics and explore potential beneficial factors to aid healthcare professionals in clinical practice.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to July 19, 2022. Studies related to patients with schizophrenia who had been previously treated with OAPs and switched to PP1M were identified and included. Outcomes included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, the clinical Global Impressions – Severity (CGI-S) score, the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) total score, and hospitalisation rate. Data were independently extracted and analysed. The results were presented through a narrative synthesis.ResultsEleven studies with a total of 4150 patients were included, identifying nine potential characteristics. The most commonly reported characteristics was patient’s prior treatment with OAPs, followed by the stage of disease, duration of illness (DI), ethnicity, reason for switching to PP1M, history of hospitalisation, time of start injection of PP1M, the PANSS and PSP total score at baseline. Patients in the acute stage, with a shorter DI, a less than 1-week time interval to PP1M injection, and a lower PANSS total score at baseline may have a trend on providing better improvements on PANSS total score. Acute stage and shorter DI also showed potential trends in reducing CGI-S score. Early initiation of PP1M, switching for reasons other than lack of efficacy, and a higher PSP score at baseline exhibited potential trends towards better PSP total score improvements.ConclusionOur findings may suggest that patients in acute stage, with a shorter duration of illness, with early initiation of PP1M injection, and lower PANSS or PSP scores may trend towards better clinical results when transitioning to PP1M from OAPs. Further research is necessary to validate these potential associations and identify any unexplored characteristics. Such investigations are crucial for providing comprehensive clinical recommendations and informing treatment strategies in this context.

Effects of aripiprazole on prolactin levels and differences in effectiveness in patients with schizophrenia: a post-hoc analysis of the real-world data of a multicenter study.

To investigate the effect of aripiprazole on prolactin levels in patients with schizophrenia and analyze whether varying baseline prolactin levels affect the effectiveness and safety of aripiprazole, in a real-life diagnostic and therapeutic setting in a post-hoc analysis. In this post-hoc analysis, patients with schizophrenia in the acute phase were divided into an elevated-prolactin group and a normal-prolactin group. After 8 weeks of aripiprazole treatment, changes in the proportion of patients with an abnormal prolactin level were analyzed in both groups, and the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole were compared between the two groups. The elevated-prolactin group had more women, a longer duration of disease, and lower Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and subscale scores at baseline compared with the normal-prolactin group (all P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with prior use of antipsychotic medication between the two groups. Regardless of previous antipsychotic use, patients in both groups developed hyperprolactinemia (23/168 [13.7%] in those who had taken antipsychotics vs. 43/375 [11.4%] in those who had not). After 8 weeks of aripiprazole treatment, the proportion of patients with abnormal prolactin in the elevated-prolactin group significantly decreased with prolonged treatment (P < 0.001), and aripiprazole had no significant effect on the normal-prolactin group (P = 0.250). Normal-prolactin group showed better efficacy than the elevated-prolactin group, and the differences in efficacy between the two groups was observed from week 4 to the endpoint (all p<0.05). In total, 87.2% (68/78) patients experienced mild to moderate adverse events in the elevated-prolactin group, which was significantly more frequent compared with the normal-prolactin group 71.0% (365/514). In this real-world study, for patients with acute schizophrenia, aripiprazole was effective in lowering the proportion of patients with abnormal prolactin levels, while it had no significant effect on patients with normal baseline prolactin. After adjusting for factors such as sex, age, prior antipsychotic drugs use history and disease severity, effectiveness and safety of aripiprazole in patients with normal baseline prolactin was significantly better than that in patients with elevated baseline prolactin.

Mismatch negativity in schizophrenia spectrum and bipolar disorders: Group and sex differences and associations with symptom severity.

Research increasingly implicates glutamatergic dysfunction in the pathophysiologies of psychotic disorders. Auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) is an electroencephalography (EEG) waveform linked to glutamatergic neurotransmission and is consistently attenuated in schizophrenia (SCZ). MMN consists of two subcomponents, the repetition positivity (RP) and deviant negativity (DN) possibly reflecting different neural mechanisms. However, whether MMN reduction is present across different psychotic disorders, linked to distinct symptom clusters, or related to sex remain to be clarified. Four hundred participants including healthy controls (HCs; n=296) and individuals with SCZ (n=39), bipolar disorder (BD) BD typeI (n=35), or BD type II (n=30) underwent a roving MMN paradigm and clinical evaluation. MMN, RP and DN as well their memory traces were recorded at the FCZ electrode. Analyses of variance and linear regression models were used both transdiagnostically and within clinical groups. MMN was reduced in SCZ compared to BD (p=0.006, d=0.55) and to HCs (p<0.001, d=0.63). There was a significant group×sex interaction (p<0.003) and the MMN impairment was only detected in males with SCZ. MMN amplitude correlated positively with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score and negatively with Global Assessment of Functioning Scale score. The deviant negativity was impaired in males with SCZ. No group differences in memory trace indices of the MMN, DN, or RP. MMN was attenuated in SCZ and correlated with greater severity of psychotic symptoms and lower level of functioning. Our results may indicate sex-dependent differences of glutamatergic function in SCZ.

Efficacy and safety of blonanserin versus risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of blonanserin and risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia and to provide reliable pharmacotherapeutic evidence for in the clinical treatment of schizophrenia.MethodsWe systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases for head-to-head randomized controlled trials that compared blonanserin with risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia. We extracted the following data: author, year, country, diagnostic criteria, sample size, course of treatment, dosage and outcomes. Our main endpoint was the changes in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores. Meta-analysis of the included data was conducted by RevMan 5.3 software. We used the GRADE criteria to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.ResultsA total of 411 studies were initially; 8 trials were eligible and were included in our analysis (N = 1386 participants). Regarding efficacy, there was no difference in changes in the PANSS total scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). In terms of safety, compared to risperidone, the incidence of serum prolactin increases and weight gain in the blonanserin group was lower (P<0.05), but the incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) was higher (P<0.05).ConclusionThe efficacy of blonanserin is similar to that of risperidone, but it is unclear whether blonanserin is more effective than risperidone at improving cognitive and social function. More high-quality studies are needed to verify the efficacy and safety of blonanserin in the future.

Effectiveness and Safety of Switching from Oral Antipsychotics to Once-Monthly Paliperidone Palmitate (PP1M) in the Management of Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Considering the improvement in adherence and convenience, once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) has been increasingly used in the treatment of schizophrenia. However, the outcomes for patients who switch from oral antipsychotics (OAPs) to PP1M have not been reliably assessed. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of PP1M in the management of patients with schizophrenia with a prior history of OAP use. We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library on 19 July 2022 to identify eligible studies. All studies that examined the effectiveness and safety of switching from OAPs to PP1M in patients with schizophrenia were included. The primary outcomes were relapse rate, hospitalisation rate, and the change from baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. The secondary outcomes included the changed number of inpatient visits, changed length of stay hospitalisation, change from baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score and the personal and social performance (PSP) total score, response rate, proportion of treatment discontinuation, and adverse events. We included randomised-controlled trials (RCTs), single-arm studies, and observational studies. Case reports, case series, and reviews were excluded. The quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB2), the 9-point Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) instrument for non-randomised studies and cohort studies, and the 12-item National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for before-after (Pre-Post) study without control group. Follow-up times were reported as short- (≤ 13 weeks), medium- (14-26 weeks), and long term (≥ 27 weeks). Data were pooled using meta-analysis. Fifteen studies with a total of 4740 patients were included. The long-term relapse rates and hospitalisation rates were 12% (95% CI 0.07-0.18) and 18% (95% CI 0.15-0.20), respectively. The short-, medium-, and long-term change in PANSS total score was - 21.69 (95% CI - 30.02 to -13.36), - 14.98 (95% CI - 21.45 to - 8.51) and - 17.88 (95% CI - 31.94 to -3.82), respectively. Approximately 50% of patients reported at least a 30% reduction in the PANSS score at the short-term follow-up. Improvements in CGI-S and PSP score were observed during various periods. There was a reduction in the length of stay hospitalisation and the number of inpatient visits at the medium- and long-term follow-ups. Low discontinuation and adverse event rates were reported. Based on our findings, this study may support the efficacy and safety of switching from OAPs to PP1M for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Future large-scale studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Paliperidone 6-month Formulation: An Open-label 2-year Extension of a 1-year Double-blind Study in Adult Participants With Schizophrenia.

Paliperidone palmitate 6-month (PP6M) demonstrated noninferiority to paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) in preventing relapse in patients with schizophrenia in a phase-3 double-blind (DB) study (NCT03345342). Here, we report long-term efficacy and safety results from a 2-year single-arm, open-label extension (OLE; NCT04072575) of this DB study. Participants who completed the DB study without relapse were enrolled and followed-up every 3 months up to 2 years. Participants received 4 PP6M gluteal-injections (700/1000mg eq.) at baseline, 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month visits. Efficacy endpoints included assessment of relapse, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, Personal and Social Performance (PSP) score, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale change from baseline. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), physical examinations, and laboratory tests. Of 178 participants enrolled, 154 (86.5%) completed the OLE; mean age: 40.4 years, men: 70.8%. Mean duration of PP6M exposure during OLE was 682.1 days. Overall, 7/178 (3.9%) participants relapsed between 20-703 days after enrolment. Mean (SD) change from baseline to endpoint: PANSS total score, 0.7 (8.22); CGI-S, 0.0 (0.51); PSP Scale, 0.5 (7.47). Overall, 111/178 participants (62.4%) reported ≥1 TEAE; most common (>5%) TEAEs were headaches (13.5%) and increased blood prolactin/hyperprolactinemia (18.0%); 8/178 (4.5%) participants experienced serious TEAEs, and 6/178 (3.4%) participants withdrew due to TEAEs; no deaths were reported. The relapse rate observed with PP6M during the 2-year OLE was low (3.9%). Clinical and functional improvements demonstrated in the DB study were maintained during OLE and no new safety concerns were identified.

Body mass index, waist circumference, insulin, and leptin plasma levels differentiate between clozapine-responsive and clozapine-resistant schizophrenia.

Between 25% and 50% of patients suffering from treatment-resistant schizophrenia fail to achieve a clinical response with clozapine. The rapid identification and treatment of this subgroup of patients represents a challenge for healthcare practice. To evaluate the relationship between metabolic alterations and the clinical response to clozapine. A multicenter, observational, case-control study was performed. Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia treated with clozapine were eligible (minimum dose 400 mg/d for at least 8 weeks and/or clozapine plasma levels ⩾ 350 µg/mL). According to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, patients were classified as clozapine-responsive (CR) (<80 points) or clozapine non-responsive (CNR) (⩾80 points). Groups were compared based on demographic and treatment-related characteristics, together with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, insulin, leptin, and C-reactive protein plasma levels. Plasma levels of clozapine and its main metabolite, nor-clozapine, were measured in all the participants. In addition, the potential relationship between PANSS scores and leptin or insulin plasma levels was assessed. A total of 46 patients were included: 25 CR and 21 CNR. BMI and waist circumference, fasting insulin and leptin plasma levels were lower in the CNR group, while C-reactive protein was not different. Moreover, significant negative correlations were observed between PANSS positive and general psychopathology subscores, on one hand, and insulin and leptin plasma levels, on the other hand, as well as between PANSS negative subscores and leptin plasma levels. Our results suggest that the lack of metabolic effect induced by clozapine is associated with the lack of clinical response.

Synaptic Terminal Density Early in the Course of Schizophrenia: An In Vivo UCB-J Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging Study of SV2A

BackgroundThe synaptic hypothesis is an influential theory of the pathoetiology of schizophrenia (SCZ), which is supported by the finding that there is lower uptake of the synaptic terminal density marker [11C]UCB-J in patients with chronic SCZ than in control participants. However, it is unclear whether these differences are present early in the illness. To address this, we investigated [11C]UCB-J volume of distribution (VT) in antipsychotic-naïve/free patients with SCZ who were recruited from first-episode services compared with healthy volunteers. MethodsForty-two volunteers (SCZ n = 21, healthy volunteers n = 21) underwent [11C]UCB-J positron emission tomography to index [11C]UCB-J VT and distribution volume ratio in the anterior cingulate, frontal, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices; the temporal, parietal and occipital lobes; and the hippocampus, thalamus, and amygdala. Symptom severity was assessed in the SCZ group using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. ResultsWe found no significant effects of group on [11C]UCB-J VT or distribution volume ratio in most regions of interest (effect sizes from d = 0.0–0.7, p > .05), with two exceptions: we found lower distribution volume ratio in the temporal lobe (d = 0.7, uncorrected p < .05) and lower VT/fp in the anterior cingulate cortex in patients (d = 0.7, uncorrected p < .05). The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score was negatively associated with [11C]UCB-J VT in the hippocampus in the SCZ group (r = −0.48, p = .03). ConclusionsThese findings indicate that large differences in synaptic terminal density are not present early in SCZ, although there may be more subtle effects. When taken together with previous evidence of lower [11C]UCB-J VT in patients with chronic illness, this may indicate synaptic density changes during the course of SCZ.

Ulotaront: review of preliminary evidence for the efficacy and safety of a TAAR1 agonist in schizophrenia.

Ulotaront is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist in Phase 3 clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. Ulotaront was discovered through a unique, target-agnostic approach optimized to identify drug candidates lacking D2 and 5-HT2A receptor antagonism, while demonstrating an antipsychotic-like phenotypic profile in vivo. The mechanism of action (MOA) of ulotaront is thought to be mediated by agonism at TAAR1 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors. Ulotaront has completed two Phase 2 trials (4-week acute study and 26-week open-label extension) which led to Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of schizophrenia. In the double-blind, placebo-controlled, acute study, ulotaront was associated with significant (p < 0.001) improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (effect size [ES]: 0.45), with improvements vs. placebo also observed across secondary endpoints. Post-hoc analyses of the acute trial revealed additional evidence to support the effect of ulotaront on negative symptoms. In the 4-week study, ulotaront was well-tolerated, with an incidence of adverse events (AEs) numerically lower compared to placebo (45.8% vs. 50.4%; with a number needed to harm [NNH] for individual ulotaront AEs all > 40). The open-label extension demonstrated further improvement across schizophrenia symptoms and confirmed the tolerability of ulotaront, with a 6-month completion rate of 67%. Based on current data, ulotaront shows potential to be a first-in-class TAAR1 agonist for the treatment of schizophrenia with a safety and efficacy profile distinct from current antipsychotics.

Sleep Problems, Suicidal Ideation, and Psychopathology in First-Episode Psychosis.

Insomnia occurs frequently in the clinical course of schizophrenia. A growing literature has found associations between insomnia, suicidal ideation and behavior, and psychopathology in schizophrenia. We explored associations between sleep problems, suicidal ideation, and psychopathology in a cohort of patients with first-episode psychosis. We performed a secondary analysis of data for n = 403 subjects with data from the Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode study using regression models. The prevalence of sleep problems and suicidal ideation at baseline was 57% and 15%, respectively. After controlling for potential confounders, in the study baseline sleep problems were associated with increased odds of suicidal ideation with evidence of a dose-dependent relationship (OR = 2.25, 95% CI 1.15-4.41, P = .018). Over 24 months, sleep problems at any time point were associated with an over 3-fold increased odds of concurrent suicidal ideation (OR = 3.21, 95% CI 1.45-7.14, P = .004). Subjects with persistent sleep problems were almost 14 times more likely to endorse suicidal ideation at least once over the study than those without sleep problems (OR = 13.8, 95% CI 6.5-53.4, P < .001). Sleep problems were also a predictor of higher Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total (β = 0.13-0.22), positive (β = 0.14-0.25), and general (β = 0.16-0.27) subscale scores at baseline and multiple follow-up visits (P < .01 for each). Sleep problems are highly prevalent and associated with suicidal ideation and greater psychopathology in first-episode psychosis. Formal assessment and treatment of insomnia appear relevant to the clinical care of patients with psychosis as a predictor of suicidal ideation and symptom severity.

Paliperidone Palmitate versus Risperidone Long-Acting Injectable in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of paliperidone palmitate (PP) treatment compared with risperidone long-acting injectable (LAI) treatments for patients with schizophrenia. Data mining was conducted in April 2022 across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and PsycINFO. All published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effect of PP treatment for patients with schizophrenia when compared with the risperidone-LAIAs group were included. Relevant data were extracted and synthesized narratively. Results were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) or risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Four RCTs with 2451 patients met all the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Efficacy analyses showed no significant statistical differences in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score changes at the endpoint (SMD = 0.10, P = 0.19), or in response rates (RR = 0.93; P = 0.40). Regarding the safety outcomes, PP treatment showed significantly increased risks of discontinuation rates for any reason (35.7% vs 30.4%; RR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.39; P = 0.02) and nonsignificantly increased risks of total treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (66.6% vs.64.8%; RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.09; P = 0.78) compared with the risperidone-LAIAs-treated group. Furthermore, PP may significantly increase total discontinuation rates compared with risperidone-LAIAs. Our meta-analysis did not find a more beneficial effect of PP compared to risperidone-LAIAs treatments for schizophrenia. Clinicians should interpret and translate our data with caution, as the meta-analysis was based on a limited number of randomized controlled trials and patients.

Factor Analysis Investigating the Efficacy of HP-3070 Transdermal System in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Five Adults With Schizophrenia

AbstractIntroductionHP-3070, a once-daily asenapine transdermal system, is FDA-approved for adults with schizophrenia. In a pivotal phase 3 randomized controlled study, patients with schizophrenia who were treated once daily with HP-3070 demonstrated significant improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores compared with placebo. The PANSS score’s five-factor structure can also assess treatment efficacy across different domains. This post-hoc analysis of the pivotal study evaluated the efficacy of HP-3070 by examining these domains.MethodsIn the pivotal phase 3 study, adults with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia were randomized to 6 weeks of treatment with HP-3070 3.8mg/24h, 7.6mg/24h, or placebo. Factor analysis of PANSS scores was performed using five domains (negative symptoms, positive symptoms, disorganized thought, uncontrolled hostility/excitement, anxiety/depression). Mixed-model repeated-measures (MMRM) analysis included change from baseline in PANSS factor score as the repeated dependent variable, with country, treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, and baseline PANSS score as covariates.ResultsThe analysis included 607 patients. Least-squares mean estimates (standard error) of the difference from placebo in change from baseline to Week 6 for each factor were as follows: negative symptoms, 3.8mg/24h, -0.9 (0.43), P=0.045, and 7.6mg/24h, -0.4 (0.43), P=0.41; positive symptoms, 3.8mg/24h, -2.3 (0.57), P&lt;0.001, and 7.6mg/24h, -2.0 (0.57), P&lt;0.001; disorganized thought, 3.8mg/24h, -1.5 (0.38), P&lt;0.001, and 7.6mg/24h, -0.9 (0.38), P=0.03; uncontrolled hostility/excitement: 3.8mg/24h, -1.1 (0.30), P&lt;0.001, and 7.6mg/24h -0.9 (0.30), P=0.002; anxiety/depression, 3.8mg/24h, -0.5 (0.31), P=0.14, and 7.6mg/24h, -0.6 (0.31), P=0.07.ConclusionsHP-3070 demonstrated treatment effects on a PANSS five-factor model, with the results indicating impact on negative symptoms, positive symptoms, disorganized thought, uncontrolled hostility/excitement, and anxiety/depression. These findings suggest that HP-3070 may address a broad range of symptoms in schizophrenia.FundingNoven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical, Co.

Safety and efficacy of KarXT (Xanomeline Trospium) in Schizophrenia in the Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled EMERGENT-2 Trial

AbstractIntroductionKarXT combines the M1/M4 preferring muscarinic receptor agonist xanomeline and the peripherally restricted anticholinergic trospium. In the phase 2 EMERGENT-1 study, KarXT met the primary endpoint of a significant reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score through week 5 vs placebo, improved other key secondary efficacy measures, and was generally well tolerated.MethodsEMERGENT-2 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 5-week trial of KarXT in acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia in the inpatient setting. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to KarXT or matched placebo. Dosing of KarXT (mg xanomeline/mg trospium) started at 50 mg/20 mg BID and increased to a maximum of 125 mg/30 mg BID. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 5 in PANSS total score. Key secondary endpoints included change from baseline to week 5 in PANSS positive subscale, PANSS negative subscale, and PANSS negative Marder factor scores compared with placebo. Efficacy analyses were performed using the modified intent-to-treat population (patients with ≥1 dose of study medication, a baseline PANSS assessment, and ≥1 postbaseline PANSS assessment). All patients receiving ≥1 dose of study drug were included in safety analyses.Results252 US patients were enrolled. KarXT demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful 9.6-point reduction from baseline to week 5 (effect size=0.61) in PANSS total score vs placebo (p&lt;0.0001); a significant improvement in PANSS total score was demonstrated starting at week 2 (first postbaseline rating) and continued through the study end. KarXT also met key secondary endpoints. Results at week 5 included a 2.9-point reduction in PANSS positive subscale score with KarXT vs placebo (p&lt;0.0001), a 1.8-point reduction in PANSS negative subscale score with KarXT vs placebo (p=0.0055), and a 2.2-point reduction in PANSS negative Marder factor score with KarXT vs placebo (p=0.0022). KarXT was generally well tolerated. Overall discontinuation rates were similar with KarXT (25%) and placebo (21%). The overall treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) rate for KarXT and placebo was 75% and 58%, respectively. Discontinuation rates related to TEAEs were similar between KarXT (7%) and placebo (6%). Rates of serious TEAEs were similar with KarXT and placebo (2%, each group); no serious TEAEs were determined to be drug related. The most common TEAEs (≥5%) with KarXT were all mild to moderate in severity and included constipation, dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, headache, blood pressure increases, dizziness, gastroesophageal reflux disease, abdominal discomfort, and diarrhea. KarXT was not associated with sedation/somnolence, weight gain, and extrapyramidal symptoms.ConclusionsKarXT has the potential to be the first in a new class of treatments for patients with schizophrenia and a promising alternative to postsynaptic dopamine D2 receptor antagonists.FundingKaruna Therapeutics, Inc.