Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Dressings Research Articles

The feasibility of negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressings in paediatric hand and foot burns protocol: a pilot, single-centre, randomised control trial

IntroductionThe goal of paediatric hand and foot burn management is hypertrophic scar and/or contracture prevention. The risk of scar formation may be minimised by integrating negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) as an acute care adjunct as it decreases the time to re-epithelialisation. NPWT has known associated therapeutic burden; however, this burden is hypothesised to be outweighed by an increased likelihood of hypertrophic scar prevention. This study will assess the feasibility, acceptability and safety of NPWT in paediatric hand and foot burns with secondary outcomes of time to re-epithelialisation, pain, itch, cost and scar formation.Methods and analysisThis is a single-site, pilot randomised control trial. Participants must be aged ≤ 16 years, otherwise well and managed within 24 h of sustaining either a hand or foot burn. Thirty participants will be randomised to either standard care (Mepitel®—a silicone wound interface contact dressing—and ACTICOAT™—a nanocrystalline silver-impregnated dressing) or standard care plus NPWT. Patients will be reviewed until 3 months post-burn wound re-epithelialisation, with measurements taken at dressing changes to assess primary and secondary outcomes. Surveys, randomisation and data storage will be done via online platforms and physical data storage collated at the Centre for Children’s Health Research, Brisbane, Australia. Analysis will be performed using the Stata statistical software.Ethics and disseminationQueensland Health and Griffith University Human Research ethics approval including a site-specific assessment was obtained. The findings of this study will be disseminated through clinical meetings, conference presentations and peer reviewed journals.Trial registrationRegistered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000044729, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=381890&isReview=true, registered 17/01/2022).

Negative pressure wound therapy and conventional wound management at a rural tertiary care center – A comparative study

Background: Wounds are a major source of morbidity and sometimes, mortality and there are several ways to treat them. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is one way, and this involves the use of a suction device to aspirate and remove fluids, debris, and infectious materials from the wound bed to promote the formation of granulation tissue and wound healing. Another way is with the use of conventional wound dressings. Aims and Objectives: The aim was to compare NPWT and conventional wound dressings for the poor in a rural setting. Materials and Methods: Sixty consecutive cases clinically presenting with wounds between March 2018 and August 2019 were examined and divided into NPWT or conventional wound dressing groups. Outcome was measured by recording wound scores on day 7 or thereafter. Cases and controls were studied from admission until complete healing. Outcome and complications of NPWT and conventional wound dressings were noted. Results were tabulated in MS excel and evaluated using Graphpad Prism 9 software (San Diego, CA, USA). Results: Many patients (33.33%) were in the 5th and 6th decades of life and most (77%) were male. Many wounds were located on the foot (40%). Those patients younger than 40 years of age with a wound <10 days old had a better median wound score in both the groups. The majority of wounds (43.33%) were traumatic. Wound healing was better in non-diabetics and non-smokers. There was a considerable reduction in the organism load in the NPWT group (P=0.0078). Complications were minor. The NPWT group had a significantly shorter mean hospital stay (P=0.0001). Conclusion: NPWT enhanced granulation tissue formation leading to earlier wound healing and faster recovery compared to conventional wound dressings.

The effect of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy on infection in obese women after C-section: a meta-analysis

Most caesarean wounds resulted in infection. This become a huge burden on the health care system, considering the high number of women undergoing this type of surgery. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been recommended for a wide variety of lesions including open abdominal wounds. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of prophylactic NPWT on infection in obese women after a C-section. This was a systematic review and meta-analysis study that used articles from online databases of EBSCO, Google Scholar, and PubMed which published until 2022. The dependent variable was infections post C-section, while the independent were NPWT and standard wound therapy. The data was analyzed by RevMan 5.3. This study showed that there is no difference in the outcome of superficial site infection (SSI), deep site infection (DSI), wound dehiscence, seroma, and hematoma between women with obesity after caesarean delivery who used NPWT and standard dressing.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Traditional Dressing: An Italian Health Technology Assessment Evaluation.

This evaluation shows the main advantages related to the introduction of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in Italian clinical practice for the management of incisions in vascular surgery in patients suffering from peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and at risk of postoperative complications, compared to treatment with traditional dressings. A health technology assessment (HTA) activity was conducted assuming the hospital perspective, within a 12-month time horizon. The nine EUnetHTA Core Model dimensions were deeply explored, using scientific evidence on the topic, real-life data, and healthcare professionals' perceptions. The evaluation shows that the use of NPWT has had a positive impact in terms of higher clinical effectiveness and safety profile. The process mapping highlights how NPWT allows a reduction of 2.5 hospitalization days compared with standard dressing, with the consequent benefits considering economic, organizational, and social aspects. A significant economic saving per patient emerged, with an overall optimization of the patient's clinical pathway, impacting positively on the hospital's capacity. The budget impact analysis shows that the higher number of patients treated with NPWT, the higher the economic advantages. Furthermore, assuming the patient's perspective, it would generate an overall reduction in social costs of 28%. In conclusion, the results of this study provide helpful evidence-based information to policymakers through examinations of the relative values of intervention, thus supporting the overall hospital and institutional decision-making process to define appropriate areas of investments, leading to the achievement of not only higher clinical outcomes, but also important social, economic, and organizational advantages.

Characteristics of Fournier gangrene and evaluation of the effects of negative-pressure wound therapy.

Fournier gangrene (FG) is a life-threatening disease affecting the soft tissues of the genital, perineal, and perianal regions. This retrospective study aimed to summarize the characteristics of FG and evaluate the effects of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT). We analyzed clinical data of 36 patients with FG admitted to our department. Thirty-four cases had perianal and external genital infections, and the other two had secondary infection of the urinary fistula after trauma and retroperitoneal abscess, respectively. Monomicrobial, polymicrobial, culture-negative, and fungal infections were identified in 16, 17, 2, and 1 cases, respectively. Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus haemolyticus were the most common pathogens. The mortality rate was 8%. Twenty-seven and nine patients were treated with NPWT (group A) and conventional dressing (group B), respectively. The length of stay was 38.0 ± 16.1 and 51.0 ± 17.3 days, number of operations were 3 (3,6) and 13 (4,17), and wound healing times were 39.2 ± 18.1 and 66.5 ± 17.1 days in groups A and B, respectively. Taken together, clinicians should always consider the possibility of perianal or external genital infections progressing to FG in the daily work, especially for patients with diabetes mellitus. Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, and Staphylococcus haemolyticus are the most common causative pathogens, and NPWT is an effective adjuvant therapy for wound management with fewer operations and a shorter wound healing time.

Meta-analysis of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections (SSI) in caesarean section surgery.

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been used in reducing the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) and wound complications across various surgical categories. SSIs are a common post-surgical complication following caesarean section (CS) births, making it necessary to use prophylactic interventions to reduce SSI and wound complication incidences. To conduct an updated meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SSI incidence and wound complications in women undergoing C-sections receiving NPWT or standard dressings after wound closure. A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases, and clinical trial registries for RCTs that involved NPWT versus standard dressings in participants undergoing C-section procedures. The primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI) and other wound complications (haematoma, dehiscence, seroma. A total of 11 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis with information from 5,693 patients. A reduction in overall SSI incidence (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66-0.95, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%) and wound complication rate (RR = 0.86, 0.75 to 0.98, p = 0.02, I2 = 5%) was found with all studies pooled together. Subgroup analyses showed that NPWT did not significantly reduce SSI incidence when stratified by the type of C-section (emergency/elective) whereas the type of NPWT device had a differential effect on SSI reduction, with PICO NPWT systems showing a beneficial effect (RR = 0.72, 0.58 to 0.91, p = 0.006, I2 = 0%) in comparison to the PREVENA closed-incision device (RR = 0.94, 0.68 to 1.29, p = 0.73, I2 = 0%). Prophylactic NPWT is useful in reducing the incidence of SSIs in women undergoing C-sections based on synthesis of results from RCTs in obese women (BMI > 30 kg/m2).

626 What Is the Influence of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) on High-Risk Wounds in Pelvic Oncology?

Abstract Aim Hindquarter amputation (HQA) has a high incidence of postoperative wound complications. We aim to use the HQA procedure as a model to investigate the potential advantages of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on wound healing complications in high-risk pelvic oncology wounds. Method We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing hindquarter amputation at a single tertiary centre between January 2009 and November 2020. Patients were divided into groups who had and hadn't undergone neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) to the pelvic tumour. Results One hundred six patients were included in the study. 43.4% had NPWT. There was no difference in the incidence of reoperation in the patient group without neo-adjuvant RT between NPWT and conventional dressings (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; p=0.983, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.365–2.8). However, the use of NPWT decreased the incidence of reoperation among the patients who had NPWT who had received radiotherapy [OR], 0.087; p=0.033, 95% CI, 0.009–0.818). The incidence of wound complications has declined with the increasing use of NPWT between 2009–2020. Conclusions The application of NPWT reduces the incidence of wound complications in high-risk pelvic oncology wounds. We demonstrated a reduction in the incidence of reoperation due to wound complications in patients who received NPWT following HQA.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Dressings in Obese Women Undergoing Cesarean Section: Multicenter Parallel Group Randomized Controlled Trial

(BMJ. 2021;373:n893) Cesarean deliveries (CD) lead to increased risk for adverse maternal outcomes, especially for obese women. Obesity during pregnancy is common and increases the risk of postoperative complications such as surgical site infection (SSI), hematoma and seroma, and wound dehiscence. Use of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressings has increased in an effort to decrease SSI. This trial aimed to analyze how closed incision NPWT dressings compare with standard dressings in obese women following CD.

Impact of negative pressure wound therapy and nanocrystalline silver dressings on the quality of life of patients with chronic non-healing ulcers: a preliminary study

Therapeutic measures should be primarily directed to promote healing, but also to improve or at least to maintain HRQoL. This prospective randomized pilot study was conducted to assess the impact on HRQoL of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) combined with nanocrystalline silver dressings in outpatients with chronic nonhealing ulcers. A total of 17 patients were included in the study, 10 of which were treated with the combined method and 7 with NPWT only. Patients were followed for 6 weeks. The 36-item short-form (SF-36) questionnaire was administered to at baseline and at the end of treatment. Patients included in the study had multiple concomitant pathological conditions and a mean age of 70 years. Significant changes in different domains of the SF-36 questionnaire, including physical functioning, role limitations (physical), vitality, mental health, social functioning, bodily pain, and general health, before and after treatment were not found. The mean (standard deviation, SD) score of social functioning was 53.1 (31.8) before treatment and 66.3 (23.6) after treatment (P = 0.09). The application of NPWT with nanocrystalline silver dressings or NPWT alone for 6 weeks was effective in wound healing promotion. The impact on HRQoL was non-significant except for somewhat better benefits in the social domain in patients treated with NPWT and silver dressings. The present preliminary data could be the basis for the design of future, more robust clinical studies.

Closed-wound negative pressure therapy dressing after loop ostomy closure: a retrospective comparative study

Closed-wound negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressings were recently introduced with the purpose to reduce incisional surgical site infections (iSSI) in high-risk wounds. The aim of this study was to compare iSSI rates in patients after ostomy closure with and without additional application of a closed-wound NPWT dressing. Single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing ileo- or colostomy closure over an 8-year period (January 2013—January 2021). Intradermal non-purse string technique with absorbable sutures were used in all patients. Since November 2018, all patients (study group) received a NPWT device for a maximum of 5 days postoperatively (PICO, SMITH AND NEPHEW). Primary outcome was iSSI rate within 30 days of surgery. SSI was defined in accordance with the Center of Disease Control (CDC) classification and included superficial and deep incisional SSI. Data was retrieved from the institutional enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) database, with standardized complication assessment by trained abstractors. In total, 85 patients (25%) in the study group were comparable with 252 (75%) patients in the control group regarding demographics (age, gender, body mass index, ASA score), ostomy type and anastomotic technique (all p > 0.05), but not wound contamination class (class III: 5% vs 0%, p < 0.001). Median time to NPWT removal was 4 (IQR 3–5) days. Incisional SSI were observed in 4 patients (4.7%) in the study group and in 27 patients (10.7%) in the control group (p = 0.097). These preliminary results suggest a potential benefit of systematic application of the NPWT device after loop ostomy closure. A randomized controlled study is needed.

Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol

AimThere is a current lack of evidence in the literature to support the routine use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) in the setting of ileostomy or colostomy reversal. The aim of this study is to examine whether routine NPWT confers a lower rate of SSI than conventional dressings following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy.MethodsThe PRIC study is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-centre superiority trial to assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure confers a lower rate of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy when compared to conventional dressings. Participants will be consecutively identified and recruited. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio, to receive either the NPWT (PREVENA) dressings or conventional dressings which will be applied immediately upon completion of surgery. PREVENA dressings will remain applied for a duration of 7 days. Surgical wounds will then be examined on post-operative day seven as well as during follow-up appointments in OPD for any evidence of SSI. In the interim, public health nurses (PHN) will provide out-patient support services incorporating wound assessment and care as part of a routine basis. Study investigators will liaise with PHN to gather the relevant data in relation to the time to wound healing. Our primary endpoint is the incidence of SSI within 30 days of stoma reversal. Secondary endpoints include measuring time to wound healing, evaluating wound healing and aesthetics and assessing patient satisfaction.ConclusionThe PRIC study will assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure is superior to conventional dressings in the reduction of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy and ascertain whether routine NPWT should be considered the new standard of care.

Negative pressure wound therapy versus gauze dressings in managing open fracture wound of lower limbs: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundThe superiority of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to standard gauze dressings for managing open fractures of the lower limbs remains controversial. This study aimed to comprehensively compare their clinical efficacy through a meta-analysis using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) alone. We hypothesized that NPWT would be more superior against infections. MethodsA literature search was implemented in various databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Clinicaltrial.gov, and Cochrane Library, etc, to screen eligible RCTs. All included RCTs were evaluated for risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. In accordance with the heterogeneity assessment, a fixed-effect or random-effect model was chosen for the data analysis. ResultsTen RCTs, including 2780 patients, were eligible for the meta-analysis. We found that patients in the NPWT group showed a lower overall infection rate (MD=0.70, 95% CI: 0.54–0.90, P = 0.005), acute wound infection rate (MD = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16–0.77, P = 0.009), and shorter hospital stay (MD = 24.00, 95% CI: 6.82–84.46, P < 0.00001) compared with the control group. The NPWT group showed a higher proportion of patients with wound coverage than the control group. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of function score and other complications, including deep infection rate, amputation, and bone nonunion. ConclusionsFrom the pooled results, we suggest that NPWT may be superior than traditional gauze dressings for managing open fractures of the lower limbs.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus Honey Dressings as a Preparation of Complex Wounds before Final Coverage

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus Honey Dressings as a Preparation of Complex Wounds before Final Coverage

121 A Novel Technique for Infected Metalwork Salvage: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Copious Saline Irrigation and Direct Wound Closure Over Dressing

Abstract Aim Metalwork infection is a challenging complication, often requiring surgical removal. The senior author devised a novel technique consisting of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with high-flow rate saline irrigation and direct skin closure over the standard NPWT dressing. This study aims to evaluate the utility of this modified technique in resolving metalwork infection to allow fracture union without metalwork removal. Method This is a retrospective chart review of 24 patients (3 upper and 21 lower limb cases) with infected orthopaedic metalwork from a single centre over a seven-year period, who were all managed with this modified technique as an adjunct to standard antibiotic therapy and surgical debridement. Demographic data, surgical data and infectious disease data were collected. Patients were followed up for signs of infection recurrence. Results 23 of 24 (96%) patient had successful metalwork retention with infection resolution to achieve fracture union. No metalwork was removed due to infection. Original metalwork was maintained in 16 of 24 (67%) patients. The average duration of NPWT was 19 days and the average number of visits to the theatre for NPWT change or removal was 2.5 (mode: 2). Conclusions This series demonstrates that the modified NPWT technique is an effective adjunct therapy for infected metalwork salvage. This novel technique is safe and reliable with timely resolution of infection to allow fracture union.

Functional Hydrogels for Treatment of Chronic Wounds.

Chronic wounds severely affect 1–2% of the population in developed countries. It has been reported that nearly 6.5 million people in the United States suffer from at least one chronic wound in their lifetime. The treatment of chronic wounds is critical for maintaining the physical and mental well-being of patients and improving their quality of life. There are a host of methods for the treatment of chronic wounds, including debridement, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, ultrasound, and electromagnetic therapies, negative pressure wound therapy, skin grafts, and hydrogel dressings. Among these, hydrogel dressings represent a promising and viable choice because their tunable functional properties, such as biodegradability, adhesivity, and antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and pre-angiogenic bioactivities, can accelerate the healing of chronic wounds. This review summarizes the types of chronic wounds, phases of the healing process, and key therapeutic approaches. Hydrogel-based dressings are reviewed for their multifunctional properties and their advantages for the treatment of chronic wounds. Examples of commercially available hydrogel dressings are also provided to demonstrate their effectiveness over other types of wound dressings for chronic wound healing.

The effect of NPWT in wound healing and bacterial count on deep dermal burn injury model: An experimental study

BackgroundSepsis is one of the main causes in burn victim's mortality. The use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) provides an ideal environment to accelerate wound healing. We compare the use of normal saline (NS), intermittent NPWT, continuous NPWT and silver sulfadiazine in wound healing process. MethodThis study involved 6 Yorkshire pigs; each pig was induced with 20 burns on the flank area. Burns were divided into 4 treatment groups: NS gauze, intermittent NPWT, continuous NPWT, and silver sulfadiazine dressing. Burns were evaluated on day 1,3,7,14, and 21 for its morphology and bacterial colonization and on day 14 and 21 for the remaining burn surface area. ResultWound that received NPWT therapy appeared better in both granulation and crust formation. Remaining burn surface area (mm2) on day 14 in NS group, intermittent NPWT, continuous NPWT, and silver sulfadiazine were 107.43 ± 83.43, 178.07 ± 74.83, 146.10 ± 69.1, 126.03 ± 83.22, respectively(p = 0.457); on day 21 in NS group, intermittent NPWT, continuous NPWT, and silver sulfadiazine were 13.16 ± 16.86, 59.49 ± 20.72, 54.79 ± 46.59, 48.95 ± 39.84, respectively(p=0.169). There were no significant differences in each treatment group bacterial colonization(p>0.05). There were no significant correlation between bacterial colonization and remaining burn surface area (p>0.05). ConclusionWhile morphologically, the wound in NPWT treatment groups appeared better in granulation and crust formation, the remaining wound surface area and the number of bacterial colonization were not significantly difference compared to standard therapy (silver sulfadiazine and NS gauze). There were no significant correlation between the amount of bacterial colonization and remaining wound surface area on every treatment group.

Effect of negative pressure wound therapy on wound thermometry in diabetic foot ulcers.

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is the treatment of choice for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), and the role of NPWT in the management of DFU is limited. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of NPWT versus conventional dressing (CD) on wound healing in DFU. A total of 55 patients were included and divided into two groups: 23 patients were treated with NPWT and 32 patients with CD. The NPWT dressings were changed every 7 days, while the CDs were changed daily. Wound culture sensitivity, wound size, granulation tissue, and pain evaluation (assessed by Visual Analog Scale) were all measured at the start and 3 weeks or until the ulcer was healed. The wound margin temperature was measured at four random sites for thermometric evaluation, and normal limb temperature was also measured for comparison. Patients' satisfaction and treatment costs were also compared. On days 14 and 21, the wound size was reduced significantly in the NPWT group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The percentage reduction in wound size from baseline to days 7, 14, and 21 was significantly higher in the NPWT group (P = 0.013, P = 0.001, and P = 0.029, respectively). On days 7, 14, and 21, the granulation tissue score was significantly higher in the NPWT group (P = 0.001, P = 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). On days 14 and 21, the mean VAS score was significantly low in the NPWT group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The majority of wounds in the NPWT group were sterile on day 21 compared to those in the CD group (P = 0.008). The majority of patients in the NPWT group had excellent patient satisfaction (P < 0.001). The average material cost was significantly higher in the NPWT group (P = 0.001). The mean wound temperature of the affected limb was significantly higher compared to that of the unaffected limb (P < 0.001). In terms of early formation of granulation tissue, faster wound size reduction, less discomfort, and patient satisfaction, the study indicated that NPWT appeared to be superior. An initial rise in temperature in a DFU may indicate the presence of a pre-ulcerative lesion.

Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following soft-tissue sarcoma excision: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

AimsThe primary objective of this study was to compare the postoperative infection rate between negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and conventional dressings for closed incisions following soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare rates of adverse wound events and functional scores.MethodsIn this prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients were randomized to either NPWT or conventional sterile occlusive dressings. A total of 17 patients, with a mean age of 54 years (21 to 81), were successfully recruited and none were lost to follow-up. Wound reviews were undertaken to identify any surgical site infection (SSI) or adverse wound events within 30 days. The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score were recorded as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).ResultsThere were two out of seven patients in the control group (28.6%), and two out of ten patients in the intervention group (20%) who were diagnosed with a SSI (p > 0.999), while one additional adverse wound event was identified in the control group (p = 0.593). No significant differences in PROMs were identified between the groups at either 30 days (TESS, p = 0.987; MSTS, p = 0.951) or six-month (TESS, p = 0.400) follow-up. However, neoadjuvant radiotherapy was significantly associated with a SSI within 30 days of surgery, across all patients (p = 0.029). The mean preoperative modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) was also significantly higher among patients who developed a postoperative adverse wound event (p = 0.028), including a SSI (p = 0.008), across both groups.ConclusionThis is the first RCT comparing NPWT with conventional dressings following musculoskeletal tumour surgery. Postoperative wound complications are common in this group of patients and we observed an overall SSI rate of 23.5%. We propose proceeding to a multicentre trial, which will help more clearly define the role of closed incision NPWT in STS surgery.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1049–1056.

A Comparison of the Biomechanical Performance of 3 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Foams.

PURPOSE:The purpose of this study was to compare 3 foam dressings to (1) determine the biomechanical performance of existing negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) foams and (2) to determine if a test foam is possibly suitable as an antimicrobial “white” foam alternative for use in NPWT.DESIGN:A comparison of mechanical performance of 3 foams used for vacuum-assisted NPWT.SUBJECTS AND SETTING:Preclinical laboratory study using an in vitro model.METHODS:The performance of a “white” foam (polyvinyl alcohol [PVA]), an antimicrobial “black” foam (polyurethane [PU]), and an antimicrobial white foam alternative (test PVA) were tested and compared using 3 mechanically relevant criteria. First, the fluid removal rate was measured for 72 hours. Next, the pressure input was compared to the pressure directly beneath the center of the foam. Finally, the spread of negative pressure beneath the foam was measured and compared.RESULTS:Significant differences were found in fluid removal rates; specifically, the PU foam removed fluids faster than the PVA and test PVA foams, and the currently available PVA foams performed similarly. Both the PU and test PVA foams were able to transmit the negative pressure through the center of the dressing, while the typical PVA foam began failing at 140 mm Hg, with 50% of the samples failing at 200 mm Hg. All PU replicate foams evenly distributed the pressure, while 47% to 60% of the test PVA foams and 7% of the typical PVA foams distributed pressures evenly.CONCLUSIONS:Study findings suggest that the test PVA foam does not mechanically interfere with NPWT and performs equivalently to currently used foams. These results suggest that the test PVA may be modified and incorporated into a vacuum-assisted NPWT device. In addition, the methods employed in these experiments provide a reproducible means to compare biomechanical compatibility of various NPWT foams, dressings, and subdrape devices.

A Comparative Study between the Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Silver-Releasing Foam Dressings in the Management of Diabetic Ulcers

AbstractIntroduction Diabetic foot ulcers are one among the most commonly encountered complication of diabetes mellitus tackled by the surgical department worldwide. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and silver-releasing foam dressings are effective modalities for the treatment of ulcers. This study compares the two treatment modalities.Methods Sixty adult patients admitted with diabetic foot ulcers undergoing NPWT (vacuum-assisted closure [VAC]) or silver-releasing foam dressing (Biatain Ag) treatment were included in the study. Patients undergoing either of the treatment modalities were observed and followed up on a weekly basis prospectively. Wounds were routinely examined for the size of ulcer in area (cm2) and time taken for wound healing. Patients were also assessed qualitatively by means of a questionnaire to find out patient satisfaction and compliance.Results Time taken for wound healing among Biatain Ag group was found to be 24±9.483 days compared with only 19.73±7.575 days in the VAC group. Decrease in size ulcer measured in area was found to be 38.79% in Biatain Ag group, whereas in the VAC group it was found to be 26.56%. Patients were satisfied with both modalities of treatment; however, patient compliance was better for the Biatain Ag Group due to decrease in restriction of mobility and decrease in cost.Conclusion Overall, both modalities of treatment were found to be comparable and can be used with similar efficacy. It can be concluded that silver-releasing foam dressing can act as a beneficial alternative to NPWT in the treatment of diabetic ulcers.