Negative Fractional Flow Reserve Research Articles

Two-Year Outcomes of Asymptomatic vs. Symptomatic Patients After Deferral of Revascularization Based on Fractional Flow Reserve - Insights From the J-CONFIRM Registry.

Background: The effect of symptoms on clinical outcomes after deferral of revascularization based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) remains poorly understood.Methods and Results: From the J-CONFIRM (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter) Registry, this study evaluated 1,215 patients with stable coronary artery disease, including symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (n=571 and 644, respectively). The primary endpoint was the cumulative 2-year incidence of target vessel failure (TVF), including cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (TVMI), and clinically driven target vessel revascularization (CDTVR). An inverse probability weighted analysis was performed to adjust for the differences in baseline clinical characteristics between the 2 groups. At 2 years, the TVF rate did not differ significantly between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (6.5% vs. 4.9%, respectively; P=0.15) or between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with lesions with an FFR ≤0.80 (8.0% vs. 12.3%, respectively; P=0.20). Conversely, symptomatic patients showed significantly higher rates of TVF (6.2% vs. 3.3%; P=0.01) and CDTVR (6.2% vs. 3.1%; P=0.009) than asymptomatic patients, regardless of negative FFR values (>0.80).Conclusions: Despite negative FFR values, symptomatic patients were at higher risk of TVF than asymptomatic patients, driven primarily by a higher rate of CDTVR. Conversely, those with a positive FFR were likely to develop TVF regardless of their symptoms.

Predictors of fractional flow reserve/instantaneous wave-free ratio discordance documented during functional coronary stenosis assessment: impact of tailored diagnostic cut-offs on long-term outcomes

Abstract Background Patient- and lesion-related factors may influence concordance between instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR), potentially affecting safety of revascularization deferral. Methods Consecutive patients with at least an intermediate coronary stenosis evaluated by both iFR and FFR were retrospectively enrolled. Revascularization was at physician's discretion. The agreement between IFR and FFR at their diagnostic cut-offs (FFR 0.80, iFR 0.89) according to patient- and lesion-level characteristics was assessed. Multivariate analyses were carried to identify the independent predictors of discordance. Tailored iFR cut-offs according to predictors of discordance best matching an FFR of 0.80 were identified by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The impact of reclassification according to tailored iFR cut-offs on major cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization) among deferred lesions was investigated. Results 299 coronary stenosis (diameter stenosis 54±14%, FFR 0.84 [0.78–0.89], iFR 0.91 [0.87–0.95], left main/left anterior descending [LM/LAD] vessel 67.6%) of 260 patients were studied, and 46.5% were revascularized. Discordance rate was 23.4% (10.7% iFR-negative discordant, 12.7% iFR-positive discordant). Independent predictors of discordance were LM/LAD disease, multivessel disease, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction presentation, smoking, reduced glomerular filtration rate and hypertension. Lesion reclassification with tailored iFR-cut-offs based on patient-level predictors carried no prognostic value among deferred lesions. Reclassification according to lesion location, which was entirely driven by LM/LAD lesions (iFR-cut-offs: 0.93 for LM/LAD, 0.89 for non-LM/LAD), identified increased MACE among lesions deferred based on a negative FFR, between patients with a positive as compared to a negative iFR (19.4% vs. 6.1%, p=0.044), while the same association was not observed with the conventional 0.89 iFR cut-off (15.0% vs 8.6%, p=0.303). Conclusion Tailored vessel-based iFR cut-offs carry prognostic value among FFR negative lesions, suggesting that iFR may more safely defer revascularization of LM/LAD lesions than FFR and that a single iFR cut-off might be clinically unsatisfactory. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Real world utilization of CT derived fractional flow reserve in stable angina from contemporary practice: impact on downstream utilization of invasive coronary angiogram and clinical decision making

Abstract Background/Introduction - Fractional flow reserve (FFR), a pressure wire-based index used during coronary angiography to assess the severity of potential coronary stenosis, is considered as the reference standard for evaluating the severity of stenosis in coronary artery disease (CAD). Recently, computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRct) has been recommended for evaluating functional severity of stenoses as it improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces the need for invasive coronary angiography. Purpose To determine whether non-invasive FFRct predicts severity of coronary artery disease and whether its addition improves efficiency of proceeding to revascularisation and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) compared to coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) without FFR. Methods This observational retrospective single center study included two cohorts of patients who presented in a District General Hospital in UK. The first group consisted of all patients who underwent coronary CTA for chest pain from January 2013 to December 2014. The second cohort consisted of all patients who proceeded to have measurement of FFRct from April 2018 to June 2019 after routine coronary CTA for chest pain. The two groups showed similar demographics. FFRct was analysed using the software HeartFlow. We determined the agreement of FFRct (positive if <0.80) with stenosis on CTA and ICA (positive if >50% left main or >70% other coronary artery) and whether it correlated with need for revascularisation. We also assessed if adding FFRct <0.80 improved efficiency of referral to ICA, defined as decreased diagnosis of mild or moderate stenosis (<70%) and higher yield of severe disease (>70%). The two cohorts were compared to determine the above specific end-points. Results In the first cohort, data was collected for 915 patients. 240 (26.2%) of these patients proceeded to ICA, which showed severe disease in 31 (3.3%) patients needing revascularisation. In the second cohort of patients, 824 patients underwent coronary CTA and 201 (24.4%) proceeded to have FFRct measurements. 99 (49%) of these patients had a negative FFR and 65 (32%) patients had a positive result (<0.80). There was agreement between FFRct and invasive coronary angiography/stress echo in 44 (77%) patients, with regards to severity /revascularisation. The need for ICA was significantly reduced if coronary CTA and FFRct were both done (240/915; 26.2% vs 54/824; 6.5%: p value <0.00001). Conclusion Reserving ICA for patients with a positive FFRct (<0.80) could reduce the number of ICA after coronary CTA and augment the number of ICA leading to revascularisation. Use of FFRct as a gatekeeper to ICA will improve appropriate selection of patients referred and this in-turn will reduce the burden of complications associated with invasive procedures, reduce costs and ensure better utilization of Cath-lab resources. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios: Resting Full-Cycle Ratio, Diastolic Pressure Ratio, and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio.

BackgroundNonhyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs) such as instantaneous wave‐free ratio, resting full‐cycle ratio, or diastolic pressure ratio have emerged as invasive physiologic indices precluding the need for hyperemic agents. The current study sought to evaluate the long‐term prognostic implications of NHPRs compared with fractional flow reserve (FFR).Methods and ResultsNHPRs were calculated from resting pressure tracings by an independent core laboratory in 1024 vessels (435 patients). The association between NHPRs and the risk of 5‐year vessel‐oriented composite outcomes (VOCO, a composite of cardiac death, vessel‐related myocardial infarction, and ischemia‐driven revascularization) were analyzed among 864 deferred vessels. Lesions with positive NHPRs (instantaneous wave free ratio, resting full‐cycle ratio, and diastolic pressure ratio ≤0.89) or FFR (≤0.80) showed significantly higher risk of VOCO at 5 years than those with negative NHPRs or FFR, respectively. Discriminant ability for 5‐year VOCO was not different among NHPRs and FFR (C‐index: 0.623–0.641, P for comparison=0.215). In comparison of VOCO among the groups with deferred concordant negative (NHPRs−/FFR−), deferred discordant (NHPRs+/FFR− or NHPRs−/FFR+), and revascularized vessels, the cumulative incidence of VOCO were 7.5%, 14.4%, and 14.8% (log‐rank P<0.001), respectively. The deferred discordant group showed similar risk of VOCO with the revascularized vessel group (hazard ratio, 0.981; 95% CI 0.434–2.217, P=0.964).ConclusionsCurrently available invasive pressure‐derived indices showed similar prognostic implications for vessel‐related events at 5 years. Deferred lesions with discordant results between NHPRs and FFR did not show higher risk of vessel‐related events at 5 years than revascularized vessels.RegistrationURL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01621438, NCT01621438.

Impact of Sex Difference on the Discordance of Revascularization Decision Making Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Diastolic Pressure Ratio During the Wave-Free Period.

BackgroundSex difference in fractional flow reserve (FFR) and resting index has not been fully clarified. We sought to investigate the impact of sex on the discordance of revascularization decision making between FFR and diastolic pressure ratio during the diastolic wave‐free period (dPRWFP).Methods and ResultsA total of 759 angiographically intermediate lesions with 30% to 80% diameter stenosis by quantitative coronary angiography in 577 patients in whom FFR and dPRWFP were measured were investigated. dPRWFP was measured during the wave‐free window of 5 heart cycles at an independent core laboratory. FFR ≤0.80 and dPRWFP ≤0.89 were considered positive studies. A total of 164 vessels in 126 women (21.6%) and 595 vessels in 451 men (78.4%) were included. In lesions with negative dPRWFP, positive FFR was less frequently observed in women (13 of 73; 17.8%) than in men (97 of 286; 33.9%) (P=0.009). In lesions with positive dPRWFP, the frequency of negative FFR was observed in 22 of 91 vessels (24.2%) in women and 51 of 309 vessels (16.5%) in men, which did not reach statistical significance (P=0.098). In multivariable analyses, female sex was independently associated with FFR‐dPRWFP discordance both in negative dPRWFP cohort (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21–0.98; P=0.036) and in positive dPRWFP cohort (odds ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.17–4.96; P=0.017) after adjustment for age, weight, quantitative coronary angiography data, and baseline physiological indexes.ConclusionsThe frequency of FFR‐dPRWFP discordance was significantly associated with sex, which may indicate potential shift of optimal threshold of either FFR or dPRWFP, or both of them, according to sex.

Renal dysfunction is associated with lower incidence of positive fractional flow reserve values in patients with severe hypertension.

Renal dysfunction, an important predictor of cardiovascular mortality, is paradoxically associated with a lower incidence of positive coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR) values, possibly due to renal disease-associated myocardial microvascular dysfunction. It is unknown if this relationship is influenced by arterial hypertension, a condition strongly associated with renal- and microvascular dysfunction. The incidence of positive (<0.81) FFR values was retrospectively evaluated in consecutive patients with intermediate severity coronary artery lesions that were either associating or not associating renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance, CrCl <90 mL/min/1.73 m2), and had mild/moderate or severe arterial hypertension (treated by <3 or ≥3 different drugs). Positive FFR values were found in 49.5% of the 109 included patients, with a significantly lower incidence in those with renal dysfunction: 23 vs. 31 cases (39.7% vs. 60.8%, P=0.03). However, uni- and multivariate subpopulation analysis evidenced that renal dysfunction was a significant independent predictor of fewer positive FFR results only in severely hypertensive patients (univariate P values for mild/moderate and severe hypertension: 0.80 and <0.01, respectively; multivariate P in severely hypertensive patients: 0.04). This categorization significantly restricted the number of borderline FFR results (0.75-0.80) where measurement interpretation could be challenging because of renal dysfunction (from 13.8% to 4.6% of the whole study population, P=0.03). In the current study renal dysfunction was independently associated with a significantly higher incidence of negative FFR results in patients with intermediate severity coronary artery lesions only in the presence of severe arterial hypertension. This observation should be confirmed by large-scale prospective clinical trials.

Ticagrelor and preconditioning in patients with stable coronary artery disease (TAPER-S): a randomized pilot clinical trial

BackgroundTicagrelor is a reversibly binding, direct-acting, oral, P2Y12 antagonist used for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Ticagrelor blocks adenosine reuptake through the inhibition of equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT-1) on erythrocytes and platelets, thereby facilitating adenosine-induced physiological responses such as an increase in coronary blood flow velocity. Meanwhile, adenosine plays an important role in triggering ischemic preconditioning through the activation of the A1 receptor. Therefore, an increase in ticagrelor-enhanced adenosine bioavailability may confer beneficial effects through mechanisms related to preconditioning activation and improvement of coronary microvascular dysfunction.MethodsTo determine whether ticagrelor can trigger ischemic preconditioning and influence microvascular function, we designed this prospective, open-label, pilot study that enrolled patients with stable multivessel CAD requiring staged, fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Participants will be randomized in 1:1 ratios either to ticagrelor (loading dose (LD) 180 mg, maintenance dose (MD) 90 mg bid) or to clopidogrel (LD 600 mg, MD 75 mg) from 3 to 1 days before the scheduled PCI. The PCI operators will be blinded to the randomization arm. The primary endpoint is the delta (difference) between ST segment elevations (in millimeters, mm) as assessed by intracoronary electrocardiogram (ECG) during the two-step sequential coronary balloon inflation in the culprit vessel. Secondary endpoints are 1) changes in coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microvascular resistance (IMR), and FFR measured in the culprit vessel and reference vessel at the end of PCI, and 2) angina score during inflations. This study started in 2018 with the aim of enrolling 100 patients. Based on the rate of negative FFR up to 30% and a drop-out rate up to 10%, we expect to detect an absolute difference of 4 mm among the study arms in the mean change of ST elevation following repeated balloon inflations. All study procedures were reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of the Catholic University of Sacred Heart.DiscussionTicagrelor might improve ischemia tolerance and microvascular function compared to clopidogrel, and these effects might translate to better long-term clinical outcomes.Trial registrationEudraCT No. 2016–004746-28. No. NCT02701140. Trial statusInformation provided in this manuscript refers to the definitive version (n. 3.0) of the study protocol, dated 31 October 2017, and includes all protocol amendments. Recruitment started on 18 September 2018 and is currently ongoing. The enrollment is expected to be completed by the end of 2019.Trial sponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli – Roma, Polo di Scienze Cardiovascolari e Toraciche, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Long-term outcome after deferred revascularization due to negative fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions.

ObjectivesThe aim was to assess long‐term outcome after deferring intervention of coronary lesions with a fractional flow reserve (FFR) value of >0.80 in a real‐world patient population and then to identify factors associated with deferred target lesion failure (DTLF).BackgroundDeferring coronary interventions of intermediate lesions based on FFR measurement is safe, irrespective of the extent of coronary artery disease. However, FFR values near the cut‐off of >0.80 may have less favorable outcome.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed in patients with deferred coronary intervention based on FFR value >0.80. The primary endpoint was DTLF, a composite of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and any coronary revascularization, related to the initially deferred stenosis.ResultsA total of 600 patients, mean age of 66 ± 10 years, and 751 coronary lesions with negative FFR values (mean 0.88 ± 0.04) were included. The mean follow‐up was 27 ± 15 months. DTLF occurred in 44 patients (7.3%), revascularization in 42 (7%), and ACS without revascularization in 2 patients (0.3%). Patients with DTLF more often had diabetes mellitus, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, multivessel disease (MVD), and lower FFR at inclusion. Multivariable regression analysis showed that lower deferred FFR values [FFR 0.81–0.85: hazard ratio (HR) 2.79 (95% CI [confidence interval]; 1.46–5.32), p .002], MVD [HR 1.98 (95% CI; 1.05–3.75), p .036], distal lesions [HR 2.43 (95% CI; 1.29–4.57), p .006], and lesions located in a saphenous vein graft (SVG) [HR 6.35 (95% CI; 1.81–22.28), p .004] were independent predictors for DTLF.ConclusionsThe long‐term rate of DTLF of initially deferred coronary lesions was 7.3%. Independent predictors for DTLF are lower deferred FFR value, the presence of MVD, distal lesions, and lesions in SVG.

P2700Impact of instantaneous wave-free ratio on graft failure after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Abstract Background It has been reported that preoperative fractional flow reserve (FFR) is associated with graft patency after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and the patency is excellent when a bypass graft is anastomosed on a vessel with positive FFR. However, the association with graft patency has not yet been investigated in its novel counterpart, instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and iFR sometimes contradicts FFR results. Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess an impact of preoperative iFR on a graft failure after CABG in patients with coronary arteries showing positive FFR (≤0.80). Methods We retrospectively identified patients who had undergone preoperative coronary angiography in conjunction with resting and hyperemic intra-coronary pressure measurements, CABG, and graft evaluation by coronary computed tomography angiography. After excluding vessels with negative FFR (&gt;0.80), vessels were divided into two groups: negative iFR group (iFR &gt;0.89) and positive iFR group (iFR ≤0.89). The rate of graft failure within 1 year after CABG was compared between the two groups. Results We analyzed 131 vessels in 89 patients (35 vessels in the negative iFR group and 96 vessels in the positive iFR group). The negative iFR group showed significantly higher iFR (0.92±0.02 vs. 0.74±0.13, P&lt;0.0001) and FFR (0.72±0.06 vs. 0.63±0.09, P&lt;0.0001) than the positive iFR group, although percent diameter stenosis (%DS) was comparable (57±10 vs. 56±9, P=0.47). The graft failure significantly often occurred in the negative iFR group than in the positive iFR group (28.6% vs. 8.3%, P=0.0029). In order to reduce the imbalance in the baseline characteristics except for iFR, 70 vessels were selected by using propensity score matching (n=35 in each group). The propensity score matched vessels also demonstrated significantly higher rate of graft failure in the negative iFR group than in the positive iFR group (28.6% vs. 5.7%, p=0.026) despite much more balanced FFR (0.72±0.06 vs. 0.69±0.07, p=0.02) and %DS (57±10 vs. 57±9, p=1.000). Conclusions Even when FFR is positive, the graft failure is likely to occur when a bypass graft is anastomosed on a vessel with negative iFR compared to a vessel with positive iFR. Acknowledgement/Funding None

Endothelial dysfunction assessed by digital tonometry and discrepancy between fraction flow reserve and instantaneous wave free ratio

Background: We tested whether the level of endothelial dysfunction assessed by digital tonometry, and expressed as reactive hyperemia index (RHI), is related to occurrences of a discrepancy between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03033810).Methods: We examined patients with coronary stenosis in the range of 40–70%, assessed by both FFR and iFR (system Philips-Volcano) for stable angina. We included consecutive patients with FFR and iFR in one native coronary artery, and who had had no previous intervention.Results: We included 138 patients. Out of those, 24 patients (17.4%) had a negative FFR (with an FFR value >0.8) and positive iFR (with a iFR value ≤0.89) – designated the FFRn/iFRp discrepancy group, and 22 patients (15.9%) had a positive FFR (≤0.8) and negative iFR (>0.89) – designated the FFRp/iFRn discrepancy. RHI was higher in the discrepancy groups compared the group without discrepancy (1.73 ± 0.79 vs. 1.48 ± 0.50, p = 0.025). However, this finding was not confirmed in multivariant logistic regression analyses. Patients with any type of discrepancy differed from the agreement group by having a higher occurrence of diabetes mellitus [9 patients (21.4%) vs. 36 patients (39.6%), p = 0.029], active smoking (23 patients or 54.8% vs. 26 patients or 28.6%, p = 0.003) and lower use of calcium channel blockers (9 patients, 21.4%, vs. 43 patients, 46.7%, p = 0.004).Conclusion: The presence of endothelial dysfunction can be associated with a discrepancy in FFR/iFR. However, RHI correlated with risk factors of atherosclerosis, not with FFR or iFR.

Coronary Outcomes in Patients with Negative Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Studies

Coronary Outcomes in Patients with Negative Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Studies

Assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using fractional flow reserve (FFR) profiles derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) and invasive pressure measurements (FFRINV): Importance of the site of measurement and implications for patient referral for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention

BackgroundFractional flow reserve (FFR)-derived from computed tomography angiography (CTA; FFRCT) and invasive FFR (FFRINV) are used to assess the need for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The optimal location for measuring FFR and the impact of measurement location have not been well defined. Methods930 patients (age 60.7 + 10 years, 59% male) were included in this study. Normal and diseased coronary arteries were classified into stenosis grades 0–4 in the left anterior descending artery (LAD, n = 518), left circumflex (LCX, n = 112) and right coronary artery (RCA, n = 585). FFRCT (n = 1215 arteries) and FFRINV (n = 26 LAD) profiles were developed by plotting FFR values (y-axis) versus site of measurement (x-axis: ostium, proximal, mid, distal segments). The best location to measure FFR was defined relative to the distal end of the stenosis. FFR ≤0.8 was considered positive for ischemia. ResultsIn normal and stenotic coronary arteries there are significant declines in FFRCT and FFRINV from the ostium to the distal vessel (p < 0.001), due to lesion-specific ischemia and to effects unrelated to the lesion. A reliable location (distal to the stenosis) is 10.5 mm [IQR 7.3–14.8 mm] for FFRCT and within 20–30 mm for FFRINV. Rates of positive FFR (from the distal vessel) reclassified to negative FFR (distal to the stenosis) are 61% (FFRCT) and 33% (FFRINV). ConclusionFFRCT and FFRINV values are influenced by stenosis severity and the site of measurement. FFR measurements from the distal vessel may over-estimate lesion-specific ischemia and result in unnecessary referrals for ICA and PCI.

TCT-10 Physiological Versus Angiographic Guidance for Myocardial Revascularization in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Management of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is uncertain. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has never been validated in aortic stenosis (AS). Safety of deferring negative FFR coronary lesions in AS is not established. The study aim

Análise comparativa do fractional flow reserve (FFR) e do instantaneous wave‐free ratio (iFR): resultados de um registo de 5 anos

Introduction and ObjectiveAssessment of coronary lesions by the instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) has generated significant debate. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of iFR and its impact on the decision to use fractional flow reserve (FFR) and on procedural characteristics. MethodsIn this single‐center registry of patients undergoing functional assessment of coronary lesions, FFR was used as a reference for assessing the diagnostic performance of iFR. An iFR value <0.86 was considered positive and a value >0.93 was considered negative. ResultsFunctional testing was undertaken of 402 lesions, of which 154 were assessed with both techniques, 222 with FFR only, and 26 with iFR only. Using a cut‐off of ≤0.80 for iFR, the area under the curve was 0.73 (95% CI 0.65‐0.81), with an optimal value of ≤0.91. FFR was undertaken in 93 out of 94 lesions with an inconclusive iFR and was performed in 69.1% of the remaining iFR‐tested lesions. Concordance between iFR and FFR was 87% (chi‐square=22.43; p<0.001). Notwithstanding, there were four out of 13 cases (30.7%) of positive iFR with negative FFR and three out of 42 (7.1%) cases of negative iFR and positive FFR. This difference was significant (p=0.026). iFR had no impact on procedure time, fluoroscopy time or radiation dose. ConclusioniFR had a reasonable diagnostic performance. Operators often chose to perform FFR despite conclusive iFR results. iFR and FFR were highly concordant, but a non‐negligible proportion of lesions classified as ischemic by iFR were classified as non‐ischemic by FFR. iFR had no impact on procedural characteristics.

Representation Rates Following Negative Fractional Flow Reserve: Real-World Experience

Representation Rates Following Negative Fractional Flow Reserve: Real-World Experience

Comparison between Myocardial Ischemia Evaluation by Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy

Abstract Background: Moderate coronary artery lesions can be, or not, responsible for myocardial ischemia. The functional analysis of these lesions can be performed by invasive and noninvasive methods. Objective: To compare the functional analysis of moderate coronary lesions by fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Methods: 47 patients with stable coronary artery disease and at least one moderate coronary artery obstruction were prospectively studied. They were submitted to fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with a median interval of 24.5 days between January 2013 and December 2015. There was no change in clinical status or revascularization procedure between the exams. The population variables were described as medians and interquartile range. Fractional flow reserve was performed in one left main coronary artery; 37 left descending coronary arteries; 12 circumflex arteries and 4 right coronary arteries. Fractional flow reserve < 0.8 was considered positive. The comparative analysis between the results of the tests was performed by two-tailed Fisher’s test and a p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Fractional flow reserve < 0.8 was found in the left main coronary artery (100%); 13 in the left descending coronary artery (35.14%); 6 in circumflex artery (50%) and 2 in the right coronary artery (50%). Among the patients with positive fractional flow reserve, 83% had myocardial ischemia demonstrated by the myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (p = 0.058). When analyzing specifically the left descending coronary artery, 83% of the patients with negative fractional flow reserve showed no ischemia at the myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, but 69% of the patients with positive fractional flow reserve showed no ischemia at the myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (p = 0.413). Conclusion: Disagreements can occur between the results of the functional analysis of moderate coronary lesions by invasive and noninvasive tests.

Diagnostic Concordance and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve and Stress Echocardiography for the Assessment of Coronary Stenosis of Intermediate Severity

The ischemic consequences of coronary artery stenosis can be assessed by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) or by noninvasive imaging. We sought to determine (1) the concordance between wall thickening assessment during clinically indicated stress echocardiography (SE) and FFR measurements and (2) the factors associated with hard events in these patients. Two hundred twenty-three consecutive patients who underwent SE and invasive FFR measurements in close succession were analyzed retrospectively for diagnostic concordance and clinical outcomes. At the vessel level, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of SE for identifying significant disease as assessed by FFR was 68%, 75%, 43%, and 89%, respectively. The greatest discordance was seen in patients with wall thickening abnormalities (WTAs) and negative FFR. During a follow-up of 3.6±2.2years, there were 23 cardiovascular (CV) events (death and nonfatal myocardial infarction). The number of wall segments with inducible WTAs emerged as the strongest factor associated with CV events (hazard ratio, 1.18 [1.05-1.34]; P=.008). FFR was not associated with outcome. There was a significant increase in event rate in patients with WTA/negative FFR versus no WTA/negative FFR (P=.01), but no significant difference versus WTA/positive FFR (P=.85). In a patient population with significant CV risk factors, a normal SE had a high negative predictive value for excluding abnormal FFR. WTAs were associated with outcomes regardless of FFR value, suggesting that this is a superior marker of ischemia to FFR.

P2373Long-term outcome of coronary lesions with deferred revascularization due to negative fractional flow reserve

P2373Long-term outcome of coronary lesions with deferred revascularization due to negative fractional flow reserve

115 Diagnostic concordance and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing fractional flow reserve and stress echocardiography for the assessment of coronary stenosis of intermediate severity

IntroductionThe ischaemic consequences of a coronary artery stenosis can be assessed by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) or by non-invasive imaging. We sought to determine (i) the concordance between wall...

Factors associated with deferred lesion failure following fractional flow reserve assessment in patients with diabetes mellitus.

To explore the predictors of deferred lesion failure (DLF) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and lesions with a fractional flow reserve (FFR) >0.80 and to examine whether a predictive relationship between negative FFR values (>0.80-1.00) and DLF exists. DM is associated with rapidly progressive atherosclerosis and predictors of DLF in FFR negative lesions in this high-risk group are unknown. All DM patients who underwent FFR-assessment between 1/01/2010 and 31/12/2013 were included, and followed until 1/7/2015. Patients carrying ≥1 FFR negative lesion(s) were assessed for DLF, and multivariate models used to identify independent factors associated with DLF. A total of 205 patients with 252 FFR >0.80 lesions were identified. At a mean follow-up of 3.1 ± 1.4 years, DLF occurred in 29/205 (14.1%) patients, 31/252 (12.3%) lesions. Using marginal Cox regression multivariate analysis, insulin requiring DM [HR 2.24 (95%CI; 1.01-4.95), P = 0.046] and prior revascularization [HR 2.70 (95%CI 1.21-6.01), P = 0.015] were identified as being associated with a higher incidence of DLF. Absolute FFR values in FFR negative lesions in DM patients are not predictive of DLF (receiver operating characteristics curve analysis: area under the curve: 0.57 ± 0.06, 95%CI 0.46-0.69). In DM patients with FFR negative lesions, insulin requiring DM and prior revascularization are predictors for DLF. In contrast to non-DM patients, no predictive relationship between absolute negative FFR values (ranging >0.80-1.00) and the risk of DLF exists in DM patients. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.