You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Epidemiology and Natural History I1 Apr 2010123 GENETIC VARIANTS SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVE DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER AND ARE ASSOCIATED WITH AGGRESSIVE FEATURES IN PATIENTS WITH A “NORMAL” PSA AND DRE Brian T. Helfand, Stacy Loeb, Matthias D. Hofer, Ronald Kim, Phillip R. Cooper, Donghui Kan, and William J. Catalona Brian T. HelfandBrian T. Helfand Chicago, IL More articles by this author , Stacy LoebStacy Loeb Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , Matthias D. HoferMatthias D. Hofer Chicago, IL More articles by this author , Ronald KimRonald Kim Chicago, IL More articles by this author , Phillip R. CooperPhillip R. Cooper Chicago, IL More articles by this author , Donghui KanDonghui Kan Chicago, IL More articles by this author , and William J. CatalonaWilliam J. Catalona Chicago, IL More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.174AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Several reports suggest that a combination of genetic prostate cancer (CaP) susceptibility variants may independently predict CaP risk and tumor features. However, the ability to detect CaP in patients with a “normal” PSA and non-suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) remains to be determined. Therefore, the present study examined the performance of genetic variants in prediction models for CaP risk and aggressiveness. METHODS From June 2002-May 2008, we examined 79 Caucasian men with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer diagnosed at a PSA <4.0 ng/mL and 595 controls with negative DRE and PSA <4.0 ng/mL. The genotypes for 14 CaP risk alleles (on chromosomes 2p15, 3q21, 5p15, 8q24, 10q11, 11q13, 17q12, 17q24, 19q13, and Xp11) were compared between CaP cases and controls. Additional analyses were used to compare the pathologic features between carriers and non-carriers of the variants. RESULTS 12 of the variants were over-represented in CaP patients with “normal” PSA values compared to controls. Among Caucasian men with “normal” PSA values, carriers of an increasing number of genetic variants were at a significantly increased risk of CaP (p-trend<0.001). Men with ≥9 genetic variants had an OR of 6.7 (95% CI 2.0-23.7) compared to men with ≤4 variants (Table 1). On multivariate analysis with age, the genetic variants remained significant predictors of CaP risk in this population (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.8, p=0.0005). There also was an increase in the frequency of high Gleason grade (≥7) disease in carriers of 11 variants. Specifically, a statistically significant difference was observed for the frequency of both high-grade cancer (p=0.03) and seminal vesicle invasion (p=0.02) in carriers of the 8q24 rs16901979 variant. Table 1. Cumulative Model Comparing Frequency of Genetic Variants in Patients with “Normal” PSA and DRE Carrier of Variants # Case N=(%) Control N=(%) OR (95% C.I.) p-value 0-4 9(11.4) 145(24.4) — — 5 19(24.0) 158(26.5) 1.9(0.8-4.4) 0.12 6 14(17.8) 129(21.7) 1.7(0.7-4.2) 0.21 7 19(24.0) 108(18.2) 2.8(1.2-6.5) 0.14 8 13(16.5) 43(7.2) 4.9(2.0-12.2) 0.0007 ≥9 5(6.3) 12(2.0) 6.7(1.9-23.2) 0.0026 CONCLUSIONS A substantial proportion of biopsy-detectable CaP occurs in men with PSA levels >4 ng/mL and negative DRE. In this population, genetic risk variants are significantly associated with CaP risk and may guide in the prediction of aggressive disease. Future studies are warranted to determine the utility of incorporating genetic risk alleles into CaP screening programs. © 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e50 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Brian T. Helfand Chicago, IL More articles by this author Stacy Loeb Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Matthias D. Hofer Chicago, IL More articles by this author Ronald Kim Chicago, IL More articles by this author Phillip R. Cooper Chicago, IL More articles by this author Donghui Kan Chicago, IL More articles by this author William J. Catalona Chicago, IL More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract