Brief Description of the Purpose of the StudyIntradermal injections induces better immunological response than subcutaneous or intramuscular injections with smaller vaccine volumes. Real-time, 2D and 3D Ultrasound imaging was performed to better understand tissue distribution of needle-free-jet-injection (NFJI) systems to evaluate depth of penetration and tissue dispersion of vaccines.MethodsTwo different brands of NFJE were evaluated comparing intradermal injection performances. Twenty healthy human volunteers were selected to participate in the study. They were equally distributed among two device groups according to racial, age, sex and BMI. Two needle free injections of 0,2 and 0,5 ml saline solution were monitored using real time ultrasound imaging scanning tissue distribution, cavitation and leak back phenomena. Imediately, 2D and 3D scans were performed to evaluate dermal thickness pre and post injection, maximum dispersion and maximum depth of injection. These data were analised with ANOVA and Mann-Whitney /Wilcoxon tests.Main ResultsThe skin thickness not varies significantly with populational parameters but there were significant differences between pre and post injection thickness. Ultrasound could confidently discriminate intradermal and/or subcutaneous saline distribution in patients with different populational parameters and different injector brands, pressure profiles and performances.Importance of the ConclusionsUltrasound is a good, harmless, confident, reproductible and cheap method to evaluate performance NFJI devices optimization with huge impact in populational immunization. Brief Description of the Purpose of the StudyIntradermal injections induces better immunological response than subcutaneous or intramuscular injections with smaller vaccine volumes. Real-time, 2D and 3D Ultrasound imaging was performed to better understand tissue distribution of needle-free-jet-injection (NFJI) systems to evaluate depth of penetration and tissue dispersion of vaccines. Intradermal injections induces better immunological response than subcutaneous or intramuscular injections with smaller vaccine volumes. Real-time, 2D and 3D Ultrasound imaging was performed to better understand tissue distribution of needle-free-jet-injection (NFJI) systems to evaluate depth of penetration and tissue dispersion of vaccines. MethodsTwo different brands of NFJE were evaluated comparing intradermal injection performances. Twenty healthy human volunteers were selected to participate in the study. They were equally distributed among two device groups according to racial, age, sex and BMI. Two needle free injections of 0,2 and 0,5 ml saline solution were monitored using real time ultrasound imaging scanning tissue distribution, cavitation and leak back phenomena. Imediately, 2D and 3D scans were performed to evaluate dermal thickness pre and post injection, maximum dispersion and maximum depth of injection. These data were analised with ANOVA and Mann-Whitney /Wilcoxon tests. Two different brands of NFJE were evaluated comparing intradermal injection performances. Twenty healthy human volunteers were selected to participate in the study. They were equally distributed among two device groups according to racial, age, sex and BMI. Two needle free injections of 0,2 and 0,5 ml saline solution were monitored using real time ultrasound imaging scanning tissue distribution, cavitation and leak back phenomena. Imediately, 2D and 3D scans were performed to evaluate dermal thickness pre and post injection, maximum dispersion and maximum depth of injection. These data were analised with ANOVA and Mann-Whitney /Wilcoxon tests. Main ResultsThe skin thickness not varies significantly with populational parameters but there were significant differences between pre and post injection thickness. Ultrasound could confidently discriminate intradermal and/or subcutaneous saline distribution in patients with different populational parameters and different injector brands, pressure profiles and performances. The skin thickness not varies significantly with populational parameters but there were significant differences between pre and post injection thickness. Ultrasound could confidently discriminate intradermal and/or subcutaneous saline distribution in patients with different populational parameters and different injector brands, pressure profiles and performances. Importance of the ConclusionsUltrasound is a good, harmless, confident, reproductible and cheap method to evaluate performance NFJI devices optimization with huge impact in populational immunization. Ultrasound is a good, harmless, confident, reproductible and cheap method to evaluate performance NFJI devices optimization with huge impact in populational immunization.
Read full abstract