Need For Supplemental Oxygen Research Articles

Pigtail Catheter Compared to Formal Intercostal Catheter for the Management of Isolated Traumatic Pneumothorax: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: The optimal management approach for adults with traumatic pneumothorax without haemothorax remains an area of debate. Specifically, there is lack of consensus as to whether insertion of a pigtail catheter is superior to a formal intercostal catheter in improving complication rates. (2) Methods: Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and the World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases were systematically searched for studies evaluating pigtail catheters compared to formal intercostal catheters for the management of traumatic pneumothorax. Investigative outcomes of interest included pain, duration management, failure, need for formal thoracoscopic surgery, need for supplemental oxygen, length of stay, infection and overall total complications. (3) Results: Three studies evaluating 280 patients were included in this analysis. There was no significant difference in total complications, rates of failure, length of stay or duration of management between pigtail catheters and formal intercostal catheters. This evidence was based on studies of low to moderate risk of bias with poor control for confounding factors. (4) Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates lack of evidence to suggest pigtail catheters are superior to formal intercostal catheter for traumatic pneumothorax. These findings may reflect a true absence of effect between either approach for this patient cohort or non-committal findings in light of limitations of the underlying evidence. Further prospective trials with larger sample sizes and control for confounders are required to validate the outcomes between these two modalities of treatment.

Pediatric Clinical Influenza Disease by Type and Subtype 2015-2020: A Multicenter, Prospective Study.

Previous investigations into clinical signs and symptoms associated with influenza types and subtypes have not definitively established differences in the clinical presentation or severity of influenza disease. The study population included children 0 through 17 years old enrolled at 8 New Vaccine Surveillance Network sites between 2015 and 2020 who tested positive for influenza virus by molecular testing. Demographic and clinical data were collected for study participants via parent/guardian interview and medical chart review. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics by influenza subtype. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess effects of age, sex, influenza subtype, and history of asthma on severity, including hospital admission, need for supplemental oxygen, and length of stay. Retractions, cyanosis, and need for supplemental oxygen were more frequently observed among patients with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. Headaches and sore throat were more commonly reported among patients with influenza B. Children with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and children with asthma had significantly increased odds of hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.39, 95% CI: 1.14-1.69 and AOR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.72-2.67, respectively). During admission, children with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 had significantly increased use of supplemental oxygen compared to children with A(H3N2) (AOR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44-0.82) or B (AOR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41-0.76). Among children presenting to the emergency department and admitted to the hospital, influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 caused more severe disease compared to influenza A(H3N2) and influenza B. Asthma also contributed to severe influenza disease regardless of subtype.

A Rare Endobronchial Tumor in a Pediatric Patient.

A pediatric patient who presented with non-specific respiratory symptoms, including mild hemoptysis, wheezing, and eventual respiratory distress, was found to have a rare endobronchial inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor obstructing her right mainstem bronchus. It was diagnosed and initially debulked using bronchoscopy, which helped to stabilize the patient and eliminate the need for supplemental oxygen. The patient subsequently underwent successful removal of the residual tumor with parenchymal-sparing sleeve resection. This case highlights the importance of pursuing appropriate imaging along with diagnostic and therapeutic bronchoscopy for an endobronchial lesion to help manage pediatric patients with persistent respiratory symptoms.

Machine Learning to Predict Disease Severity and Progression in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Using Laboratory Data on Admission

Background: Herein, we aimed to develop and test machine learning (ML) models to predict disease severity and/or progression in hospitalized COVID-19 patients through baseline laboratory features. Methods: In this retrospective study of hospitalized COVID-19 patients admitted to a tertiary care center, we evaluated routine admission data to determine the accuracy rates of different ML algorithms: k-nearest neighbor classifier, bagging classifier, random forest (RF), and decision tree. These models were compared over three outcomes: those who needed oxygen supplementation vs. who did not on admission (Analysis 1, n: 180), those who later developed oxygen requirement vs. those who did not (Analysis 2, n: 112), and those who needed invasive mechanical ventilation vs. those who did not during hospitalization (Analysis 3, n: 164). Results: The median age of the patients was 55 (44-68) years, with males constituting 47.2% of the subjects. At admission, 37.8% of the patients required oxygen supplementation. During hospitalization, 17.5% needed mechanical ventilation, and 8.3% died. For all analyses, RF had the highest accuracy in classifying the need for oxygen supplementation on admission (89.4%) or during hospitalization (91.1%) and for invasive mechanical ventilation (92.2%). These were followed by a bagging classifier for Analysis 1 (88.3%) and Analysis 3 (91.0%) and by a decision tree for Analysis 2 (88.4%). C-reactive protein, monocyte distribution width, and high-sensitive troponin-T were the most crucial laboratory contributors to Analysis 1, Analysis 2, and Analysis 3, respectively. Conclusion: Our study showed that ML algorithms could predict the need for oxygen supplementation and mechanical ventilation during hospitalization using baseline laboratory data, suggesting a slight superiority of RF, among others.

Nebulized enriched heparin improves respiratory parameters in patients with COVID-19: a phase I/II randomized and triple-blind clinical trial

To evaluate the safety and the potential antiviral treatment of inhaled enriched heparin in patients with COVID-19. The specific objectives were to investigate the anticoagulation profile, antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects, and respiratory evolution of inhaled enriched heparin. We conducted a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled Phase I/II clinical trial in hospitalized adults with COVID-19 receiving inhalation of enriched heparin or saline (placebo) every 4 h for 7 days. Among the 27 patients who completed the study, no changes in blood coagulation parameters were observed, indicating the safety of inhaled enriched heparin. The group receiving enriched heparin showed a significant reduction in the need for supplemental oxygen and improvement in respiratory parameters, such as the PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Inhalation of enriched heparin is shown to be safe and has also demonstrated potential therapeutic benefits for patients with COVID-19. These promising results justify the continuation of the study to the next phase, Phase II/III, to further evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of inhaled enriched heparin in the treatment of COVID-19-associated viral pneumonia.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. 08/02/2021. Identifier: NCT04743011.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Among Very Premature Infants in a Tunisian Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) stands as the primary chronic respiratory complication in premature infants, posing a substantial public health concern due to its rising prevalence, potential mortality, and socioeconomic burden. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of BPD in very preterm infants and identify its associated risk factors. We conducted a retrospective, descriptive, and analytical study including all premature infants born between 26 and 31 weeks of gestation age (GA) who survived beyond the 28th day of life, over a five-year period (2017-2021). Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of BPD, which was defined by the need for oxygen supplementation for at least 28 days. we included 231 newborns. The prevalence of BPD was 37.7% among survivors on the 28th day of life and 36.7% among those reaching 36 weeks postmenstrual age. BPD was mild, moderate and severe in 25.2%, 4.9% and 6.6% of cases, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified maternal hypertensive disorders (RR=6.15, 95%CI=[2.27-16.67], p<0.001), chorioamnionitis (RR=4.23, 95%CI=[1.25 -14.27], p=0.02), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (RR =20.4, 95%CI=[3.39 -122.66], p=0.001), GA less than 30 weeks (RR=26.97, 95%CI=[10.23 -71.14], p<0.001), and mechanical ventilation (MV) (RR=5.33, 95%CI=[1.95-14.54], p=0.001) as independent factors associated with BPD occurrence. The mortality rate was 10.3% among patients with BPD versus 0.7% in patients without BPD (p = 0.001). Our study revealed a high prevalence of BPD in very preterm infants and identified several independent risk factors such as maternal hypertensive disorders, IUGR, chorioamnionitis, MV, and GA less than 30 weeks.

Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Context: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has substantial effects on respiratory health and overall well-being. Recent studies suggest vitamin D as a potential treatment, but the results are inconclusive. Objective: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the link between vitamin D and patients with COVID-19. Data Sources: We searched electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, EMBASE and Google Scholar from their inception till August 2023. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria used in our systematic review include: 1) patients who tested positive for COVID-19 2) intervention was vitamin D supplementation 3) the comparator was either a placebo, standard care of treatment, or, no treatment, 4) at least one of the clinical outcomes of interest were investigated 5) study design being RCTs. Data Extraction: Two independent reviewers manually extracted information from selected articles, including study characteristics, patient characteristics, and the primary outcomes: all-cause mortality, ICU and hospital stay length and secondary outcomes: mechanical ventilation, supplemental oxygen, ICU admission, and adverse events. Risk Ratios or Mean Differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model. Data Synthesis: Our analysis included 14 RCTs with 2165 patients. Vitamin D significantly reduced ICU admissions and lowered the need for mechanical ventilation compared to placebo. However, it did not significantly affect hospital stay length, ICU stay length, mechanical ventilation duration, mortality, or the need for supplemental oxygen. Conclusion: Vitamin D does not significantly improve certain clinical outcomes, such as hospital and ICU stay length, for patients with COVID-19. However, it still may be significantly beneficial in decreasing the burden on intensive care services.

Predictors of Discharge With Supplemental Oxygen After Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

BackgroundBefore lung cancer resection, patients inquire about dyspnea and the potential need for supplemental oxygen. The objective of this study was to identify predictors of discharge with supplemental oxygen for patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer. MethodsUsing The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database, study investigators conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent lobectomy for lung cancer from July 2018 to December 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted association of pulmonary function with discharge on supplemental oxygen and identify independent predictors of discharge with supplemental oxygen. Pulmonary function was modeled as the minimum of either predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second or predicted postoperative diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide. ResultsOverall, 2100 (8.4%) patients who underwent lobectomy were discharged with supplemental oxygen. Those patients with a minimum of either predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second or predicted postoperative diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide ≤60% had a progressively increased risk of discharge with supplemental oxygen than patients with minimum function >60%. The 2 strongest predictors of discharge with supplemental oxygen were increasing body mass index (25-29 kg/m2: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.21-1.57; 30-39 kg/m2: aOR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.88-2.45; ≥40 kg/m2: aOR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.79-4.39; reference, 18.5-24 kg/m2) and former (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.67-2.52) or current (aOR, 2.61; 95% CI, 2.10-3.26) smoking status (reference, never smoker). ConclusionsOf those patients who underwent lobectomy for lung cancer, 8.4% were discharged with supplemental oxygen. The study identified preoperative independent predictors of discharge with supplemental oxygen that may be useful during shared decision-making discussions of treatment options for lung cancer and setting expectations with patients.

Sugammadex use in pediatric patients with stage IV-V chronic kidney disease in a quaternary referral hospital: a case series

BackgroundSugammadex is a pharmacologic agent that provides rapid reversal of neuromuscular blockade via encapsulation of the neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA). The sugammadex-NMBA complex is primarily cleared through glomerular filtration from the kidney, raising the possibility that alterations in renal function could affect its elimination. In pediatric patients, the benefits of sugammadex have led to widespread utilization; however, there is limited information on its application in pediatric renal impairment. This study examined sugammadex use and postoperative outcomes in pediatric patients with severe chronic renal impairment at our quaternary pediatric referral hospital.MethodsAfter IRB approval, we performed a retrospective analysis in pediatric patients with stage IV and V chronic kidney disease who received sugammadex from January 2017 to March 2022. Postoperative outcomes studied included new or increased respiratory requirement, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission, postoperative pneumonia, anaphylaxis, and death within 48 h postoperatively, unplanned deferral of intraoperative extubation, and repeat administrations of NMBA reversal after leaving the operating room.ResultsThe final cohort included 17 patients ranging from 8 months to 16 years old. One patient required new postoperative noninvasive ventilation on postoperative day 2, which was credited to hypervolemia. Another patient had bronchospasm intraoperatively resolving with medication, which could not definitively be associated sugammadex administration. There were no instances of deferred extubation, unplanned ICU or need for supplemental oxygen after tracheal extubation identified.ConclusionNo adverse effects directly attributable to sugammadex in pediatric patients with severe renal impairment were detected. There may be a role for utilization of sugammadex for neuromuscular reversal in this population.

Respiratory polygraphy in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a retrospective study.

Periodic assessment of the need for oxygen supplementation and/or mechanical ventilation in children with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is crucial. The aim of the study was to analyze the indications and results of respiratory polygraphies (RP) performed in preterm infants with BPD followed at a tertiary university hospital. All subjects <5-year-old with BPD who had a RP between September and February 2018 were included. The indications and results of RP and consequent medical management were analyzed. Fourteen infants (9 females, mean gestational age 27.6±3.3 weeks) underwent a RP at mean age of 26.4±19.4 months. Five subjects were evaluated for the need of long-term respiratory support (RS), 3 started continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), 2 were weaned from RS. Four subjects underwent RP for suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), one started on CPAP. Central apnea syndrome (CSA) was confirmed in 2 subjects and one was started on non-invasive ventilation. RP allowed safe tracheostomy decannulation in 2 subjects. Finally, RP was normal in one subject who had a brief resolved unexplained event. RP represents an important tool for the evaluation of children with BPD and leads to important therapeutic decisions.

A Case of End-stage Post-Covid-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis in a Kenyan Hospital

Post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis (PC19-PF) is one of the severe manifestations of the “long COVID syndrome,” with a prevalence of about 7%, and is characterized by the presence of persistent fibrotic lung changes (on a CT scan of the lungs) associated with impairment of pulmonary function. Some of the risk factors for PC19-PF include advanced age, the occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the need for supplemental oxygen, mechanical ventilation, smoking, etc. Antifibrotic agents, e.g., pirfenidone and nintedanib, are increasingly being used in the management of PC19-PF with good outcomes, but larger studies on efficacy and benefit are needed. In this study, we present the case of a young woman in a rural Kenyan hospital found to have end-stage PC19-PF needing long-term oxygen therapy to highlight the reality of PC19-PF in the post-COVID-19 clinical era.

The lung ultrasound in children with SARS-COV-2 infection: a national multicenter prospective study.

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) caused hospitalizations, severe disease, and deaths in any age, including in the youngest children. The aim of this multicenter national study is to characterize the clinical and the prognostic role of lung ultrasound (LU) in children with COVID-19.We enrolled children between 1 month and 18 years of age with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection who underwent a LU within 6h from the first medical evaluation.A total of 213 children were enrolled, 51.6% were male, median age was 2 years and 5 months (interquartile range (IQR) 4months-11 years and 4 months). One hundred and forty-eight (69.4%) children were admitted in hospital, 9 (6.1%) in pediatric intensive care unit. We found an inverse correlation between the lung ultrasound score (LUS) and the oxygen saturation at the first clinical evaluation (r = -0.16; p = 0.019). Moreover, LUS was significantly higher in patients requiring oxygen supplementation (8 (IQR 3-19) vs 2 (IQR 0-4); p = 0.001).Among LU pathological findings, irregular pleural lines, subpleural consolidations, and pleural effusions were significantly more frequent in patients needing oxygen supplementation (p = 0.007,p = 0.006, and p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: This multicenter study showed that LU in children with COVID-19 can highlight pleural line irregularities, vertical artifacts, and subpleural consolidation. Notably, children with higher LUS have a higher risk of hospitalization and need for oxygen supplementation, supporting LU as a valid and safe point-of-care first level tool for the clinical evaluation of children with COVID-19. What is Known: • Few children infected with SARS-CoV-2 develop a severe disease and need oxygen therapy. • Lung ultrasound can easily detect low respiratory tract infection during SARS-CoV-2. What is New: • Children with higher lung ultrasound score have a higher risk of need for oxygen supplementation. • Irregular pleural line, sub-pleural consolidations and pleural effusions were significantly more frequent in patients needing oxygen supplementation.

Severity and complications in infants with respiratory syncytial virus infection after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

After the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, there has been an increase in hospitalization for lower respiratory infection secondary to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), with greater complications. Associated extrapulmonary alterations, biventricular dysfunction, acute kidney injury, among others, have been found. The objective of this study was to analize the evolution and complications in hospitalized children with lower respiratory infection secondary to RSV after COVID-19 pandemic. All pediatric patients under 2 years of age admitted to the emergency department with RSV infection were included. Clinical characteristics, need for supplemental oxygen, use of amines, renal angina index, and requirement for renal replacement therapy were analyzed. Lung ultrasound was performed upon admission. Statistical analysis was carried out for the quantitative variables by means of mean and standard deviation, and qualitative variables by frequency and percentage. Differences in the distribution were evaluated with Fisher's exact distribution. 45 patients with RSV infection were identified, 26.7% required invasive mechanical ventilation and 11.1% requiered peritoneal dialysis. Fatality was observed in four cases, three of these younger than 12 months with a LUS score > 7; contrasts with 90.2% of survivors with a score < 7 (p = 0.0004). An increase in the incidence of bronchiolitis after pandemic was observed, with more than half having moderate to severe symptoms and requiring supplemental oxygen support in all patients upon admission. Acute kidney injury is the most common extrapulmonary manifestation.

The Association of Asthma and Metabolic Dysfunction With Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19

BackgroundThere have been conflicting results on the association of asthma with the severity of COVID-19. Poor metabolic health has been previously associated with both severe COVID-19 and inflammation in asthma. ObjectivesTo examine the association between asthma and COVID-19 outcomes and if these associations are modified by metabolic syndrome. MethodsWe performed an international, observational cohort study of adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from March 2020 through October 2021. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. ResultsThe study included 27,660 patients from 164 hospitals, 12,114 (44%) female, with a median (IQR) age of 63 years (51-75). After adjusting for age, sex, smoking, race, ethnicity, geographic region and Elixhauser comorbidity index, patients with asthma were not at greater risk of hospital death when compared to patients with no chronic pulmonary disease (controls) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97 [95%CI 0.90-1.04], p=0.40). Patients with asthma, when compared to controls required higher respiratory support identified by the need for supplemental oxygen (aOR,1.07 [95%CI 1.01-1.14], p=0.02), high-flow nasal cannula or non–invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) (aOR,1.06 [95%CI 1.00-1.13], p=0.04) and invasive MV (aOR,1.09 [95%CI 1.03-1.16], p=0.003). Metabolic syndrome increased the risk of death in asthma patients, but the magnitude of observed association was similar to controls in stratified analysis (interaction p value 0.24). ConclusionsIn this international cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, asthma was not associated with mortality but was associated with increased need for respiratory support. Although metabolic dysfunction was associated with increased risks in COVID-19, these risks were similar for patients with or without asthma.

Sleep-related breathing disorders in infants with spina bifida repaired prenatally and postnatally.

Advances in prenatal repair of myelomeningocele (MMC) have improved outcomes involving different organ systems. There is limited data on respiratory outcomes following prenatal surgical repair. We hypothesize there is no difference in respiratory outcomes between spina bifida (SB) patients who have undergone prenatal versus postnatal repair. We performed a retrospective study of 46 infants <1 year with SB seen at Children's Hospital Los Angeles from 2004-2022. Demographic data, timing of closure, neonatal course, Chiari II malformation (CIIM), ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS), polysomnography (PSG) results, and need for supplemental oxygen were collected. Unpaired t-test and Chi-square Test were used to analyze results. 31/46 had prenatal repair of MMC; average age at repair was 27 weeks post-conception (PCA). Average age at postnatal repair was 37 PCA. There was no difference in age at PSG. There was no difference in CIIM presence (p=0.61). 60% of patients with postnatal repair and 23% in the prenatal group underwent VPS placement (p=0.01). Patients with SB who've undergone closure of neural tube defect have persistent central apneas, obstructive apneas, and significant hypoxemia. There were no differences in the frequency or severity of sleep-disordered breathing in those with prenatal repair versus postnatal repair.

The Determinants of Eosinophilia in Patients With Severe Asthma.

Asthma is defined by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) as a heterogeneous disease characterized by chronic airway inflammation. The pathogenesis of the disease is better understood with the comprehension of immunological pathways. These pathways differ by the type of recruited cells and released interleukin (IL). Thus, asthma can be classified into subtypes based on the underlying immune mechanism: eosinophilic asthma (EA) and non-eosinophilic asthma (NEA). Patients with EA tend to respond better to inhaled corticosteroid as compared to those with NEA. The distinction of EA is very important in the light of emergent type 2 inflammation targeted therapies. We performed a 1-year (2018) retrospective cohort analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Database (NIS). We included all adult patients presenting with severe asthma. Patients were stratified into two groups: eosinophilic severe asthma and non-eosinophilic severe asthma. The primary outcomes measures were the prevalence of chronic steroid use, status asthmaticus, family history of asthma, food, drug and environmental allergies, presence of nasal polyps, allergic rhinitis, allergic dermatitis, need for mechanical ventilation, need for oxygen supplementation, gastroesophageal reflux disease, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. We performed descriptive statistics. Continuous parametric variables were reported using a mean and standard deviation. Continuous nonparametric variables were reported using a median and interquartile range. To compare the characteristics of the two groups, we used the independent t-test for continuous parametric variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous nonparametric variables. The Chi-square test was used to assess differences in categorical variables. A total of 2,646 patients were included, out of which 882 belonged to the eosinophilic group and 1,764 were in the non-eosinophilic group. Comparing EA versus NEA, we have found that eosinophilic group was characterized by higher percentage of steroid use (18.3% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.001). This group also had higher rates of status asthmaticus and positive family history (P = 0.009 and 0.004, respectively). The presence of allergies, allergic rhinitis, nasal polyps, and allergic dermatitis was higher among patients with eosinophilia. The need for mechanical ventilation and supplemental oxygen was also higher among this group (P < 0.001 for both); however, there was no significant difference in mortality rate (P = 0.347) and the length of hospital stay was similar in both groups (P < 0.001). We showed herein that the eosinophilic subtype of asthma differs widely from the non-eosinophilic phenotype. Clinically, patients with eosinophilia might exhibit different symptomatology, more atopy, and concomitant comorbidities. However, this group might have better response to steroid therapy and might benefit from the new emergent T2 immune targeted therapy. The identification of EA is crucial for better disease control.

An Evaluation of Type 1 Interferon Related Genes in Male and Female-Matched, SARS-CoV-2 Infected Individuals Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

SARS-CoV-2 infection has claimed just over 1.1 million lives in the US since 2020. Globally, the SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infection spread to 771 million people and caused mortality in 6.9 million individuals to date. Much of the early literature showed that SARS-CoV-2 immunity was defective in the early stages of the pandemic, leading to heightened and, sometimes, chronic inflammatory responses in the lungs. This lung-associated 'cytokine storm' or 'cytokine release syndrome' led to the need for oxygen supplementation, respiratory distress syndrome, and mechanical ventilation in a relatively high number of people. In this study, we evaluated circulating PBMC from non-hospitalized, male and female, COVID-19+ individuals over the course of infection, from the day of diagnosis (day 0) to one-week post diagnosis (day 7), and finally 4 weeks after diagnosis (day 28). In our early studies, we included hospitalized and critically care patient PBMC; however, most of these individuals were lymphopenic, which limited our assessments of their immune integrity. We chose a panel of 30 interferon-stimulated genes (ISG) to evaluate by PCR and completed flow analysis for immune populations present in those PBMC. Lastly, we assessed immune activation by stimulating PBMC with common TLR ligands. We identified changes in innate cells, primarily the innate lymphoid cells (ILC, NK cells) and adaptive immune cells (CD4+ and CD8+ T cells) over this time course of infection. We found that the TLR-7 agonist, Resiquimod, and the TLR-4 ligand, LPS, induced significantly better IFNα and IFNγ responses in the later phase (day 28) of SARS-CoV-2 infection in those non-hospitalized COVID-19+ individuals as compared to early infection (day 0 and day 7). We concluded that TLR-7 and TLR-4 agonists may be effective adjuvants in COVID-19 vaccines for mounting immunity that is long-lasting against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Using chest X-ray to predict tube thoracostomy in traumatic pneumothorax: A single-institution retrospective review.

Traumatic pneumothorax (PTX) is a common occurrence in thoracic trauma patients, with a majority requiring tube thoracostomy (TT) for management. Recently, the "35-mm" rule has advocated for observation of patients with PTX less than 35 mm on chest computed tomography (CT) scan. This rule has not been examined in chest x-ray (CXR). We hypothesize that a similar size cutoff can be determined in CXR predictive of need for tube thoracostomy. We performed a single-institution retrospective review of patients with traumatic PTX from 2018 to 2022, excluding those who underwent TT prior to CXR. Primary outcomes were size of pneumothorax on CXR and need for TT; secondary outcome was failed observation, defined as TT more than 4 hours after presentation. To determine the size cutoff on CXR to predict TT need, area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) analyses were performed and Youden's index calculated (significance at p < 0.05). Predictors of failure were calculated using logistic regression. There were 341 pneumothoraces in 304 patients (94.4% blunt trauma, median injury severity score 14). Of these, 82 (24.0%) had a TT placed within the first 4 hours. Fifty-five of observed patients (21.2%) failed, and these patients had a larger PTX on CXR (8.6 mm [5.0-18.0 mm] vs. 0.0 mm [0.0-2.3 mm] ( p < 0.001)). Chest x-ray PTX size correlated moderately with CT size (r = 0.31, p < 0.001) and was highly predictive of need for TT insertion (AUC 0.75, p < 0.0001), with an optimal size cutoff predicting TT need of 38 mm. Chest x-ray imaging size was predictive of need for TT, with an optimal size cutoff on CXR of 38 mm, approaching the "35-mm rule." In addition to size, failed observation was predicted by presenting lactic acidosis and need for supplemental oxygen. This demonstrates this cutoff should be considered for prospective study in CXR. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Impact of COVID-19 Treatment on Real-World Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

While there are multiple safe and effective agents for COVID-19 treatment, their impact in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains uncertain. Our objective was to assess the effects of these therapies on both IBD and COVID outcomes. A single-center retrospective study of adult patients with IBD who contracted COVID-19 between 12/2020 and 11/2022 was performed. Patients were stratified by COVID-19 treatment (antivirals and/or intravenous antibodies) vs no therapy. The primary outcome was the development of severe COVID-19 infection, defined by need for supplemental oxygen, corticosteroids and/or antibiotics, or hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included rates of withholding advanced IBD therapy (defined as biologic agents or small molecules) and of post-COVID-19 IBD flare. Of 127 patients with COVID-19 infection, 70% were on advanced therapies, 35% received COVID-19 treatment, and 15% developed severe COVID-19. Those treated for COVID-19 were more likely to be on corticosteroids [odds ratio (OR) 4.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72-12.39, p = 0.002] or advanced IBD therapies (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.04-7.43, p = 0.041). After adjusting for age, race, sex, corticosteroid use, obesity, COVID-19 vaccination status, and severe COVID-19 infection, those treated for COVID-19 were more likely to have IBD therapy held (OR 6.95, 95% CI 1.72-28.15, p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in rates of post-COVID-19 IBD flares or severe COVID-19 infection. There were no COVID-related deaths. Patients with IBD on advanced therapies were frequently treated for acute COVID-19. Although COVID-19 treatment was associated with temporary withholding of IBD therapy, it did not result in increased IBD flares.

Remdesivir and the Liver: A Concise Narrative Review of Remdesivir-Associated Hepatotoxicity in Patients Hospitalized Due to COVID-19

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has infected millions of people, but about 20% of infected individuals do not develop symptoms. COVID-19 is an inflammatory disease that affects a portion of individuals infected with the virus and it is associated with liver injury and other complications, leading to hospitalization, critical illness, and death. Remdesivir is an antiviral agent used for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 to improve the time to recovery, reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation, decrease the need for supplemental oxygen, and decrease the risk of mortality. Remdesivir-associated hepatotoxicity has been observed as increased transaminases more than five times the upper limit of normal in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, but causality has not been proven. It is generally difficult to distinguish between remdesivir-associated hepatotoxicity and COVID-19-induced hepatotoxicity. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the evidence for remdesivir-associated hepatotoxicity. Current evidence suggests that elevated liver enzymes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients are more likely to be due to the infection than remdesivir, and a 5-day course of remdesivir seems to be safe in regard to hepatotoxicity.