Need For Postoperative Ventilatory Support Research Articles

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ONE LUNG VENTILATION DURING THORACIC SURGERY COMPARING THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF LOW AND HIGH TIDAL VOLUME

Background: Postoperative pulmonary complications are common and highly morbid, particularly in thoracic surgery patients. Previous reports have demonstrated that protective ventilation can improve postoperative pulmonary function and reduce the incidence of complications, but the precise definition of protective ventilation remains elusive. The aim: The aim of this study to show about one lung ventilation during thoracic surgery comparing the safety and efficacy of low and high tidal volume. Methods: By the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. This search approach, publications that came out between 2014 and 2024 were taken into account. Several different online reference sources, like Pubmed, SagePub, and Sciencedirect were used to do this. It was decided not to take into account review pieces, works that had already been published, or works that were only half done. Result: Eight publications were found to be directly related to our ongoing systematic examination after a rigorous three-level screening approach. Subsequently, a comprehensive analysis of the complete text was conducted, and additional scrutiny was given to these articles. Conclusion: Low tidal volumes (defined as less than 10 mL/kg) decreases pneumonia and the need for postoperative ventilatory support (invasive and non‐invasive).

A Combination of Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block and Adductor Canal Block as a Sole Anaesthetic Technique for below Knee Amputation in High-risk Patients: A Case Series

Below-knee amputation in high-risk patients is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Spinal anaesthesia is linked to an increased incidence of hypotension and bradycardia, and it is relatively contraindicated in patients with coagulation abnormalities. General anaesthesia is used as an alternative when spinal anaesthesia is contraindicated, but it is associated with a considerable increase in perioperative morbidity and the need for postoperative ventilatory support and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) care. A combination of sciatic nerve block and femoral block has been employed for below-knee surgeries as it provides complete anaesthesia below the knee. Adductor canal block, compared to femoral nerve block, is motor-sparing and, when combined with popliteal sciatic nerve block, offers complete anaesthesia below the knee. Below-knee amputation requires complete motor and sensory blockage, making regional block for below-knee amputation more challenging for the anaesthesiologist. Present case series is of five cases of below-knee amputation performed under a combination of ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block and adductor canal block. Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block was administered with a combination of 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% and 5 mL of lignocaine 2% with adrenaline (1:200,000) diluted with 5 mL of distilled water to a total volume of 20 mL. Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block was performed with 8 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% and 4 mL of lignocaine 2% with adrenaline (1:200,000), diluted with 4 mL of distilled water to a total volume of 16 mL. All patients achieved adequate surgical anaesthesia, and none experienced any anaesthesia-related complications.

Pediatric Corrective Spine Surgery: “The Concerns and Essentials of Anaesthetic Management”

The perioperative management of children undergoing surgical correction of spinal deformities is challenging, even in the hands of an experienced anesthesiologist. A comprehensive plan is imperative keeping in mind that the surgery is extensive, the patients have other significant organ involvement and the need for neurophysiological monitoring to assess cord function and prevent neurological deficit. Meticulous prone positioning and the application of various blood- sparing techniques are an integral part of the intraoperative management. The pre-operative status and the intra-operative events could help in predicting the need for post-operative ventilatory support. The present article aims to elucidate the importance of a streamlined evaluation, monitoring, management strategy and stratification of these patients for a favorable outcome. Keywords: Paediatric, Spine surgery, Evoked potentials.

Intraoperative use of low volume ventilation to decrease postoperative mortality, mechanical ventilation, lengths of stay and lung injury in adults without acute lung injury.

Since the 2000s, there has been a trend towards decreasing tidal volumes for positive pressure ventilation during surgery. This an update of a review first published in 2015, trying to determine if lower tidal volumes are beneficial or harmful for patients. To assess the benefit of intraoperative use of low tidal volume ventilation (less than 10 mL/kg of predicted body weight) compared with high tidal volumes (10 mL/kg or greater) to decrease postoperative complications in adults without acute lung injury. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2017, Issue 5), MEDLINE (OvidSP) (from 1946 to 19 May 2017), Embase (OvidSP) (from 1974 to 19 May 2017) and six trial registries. We screened the reference lists of all studies retained and of recent meta-analysis related to the topic during data extraction. We also screened conference proceedings of anaesthesiology societies, published in two major anaesthesiology journals. The search was rerun 3 January 2018. We included all parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effect of low tidal volumes (defined as less than 10 mL/kg) on any of our selected outcomes in adults undergoing any type of surgery. We did not retain studies with participants requiring one-lung ventilation. Two authors independently assessed the quality of the retained studies with the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. We analysed data with both fixed-effect (I2 statistic less than 25%) or random-effects (I2 statistic greater than 25%) models based on the degree of heterogeneity. When there was an effect, we calculated a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) using the odds ratio. When there was no effect, we calculated the optimum information size. We included seven new RCTs (536 participants) in the update.In total, we included 19 studies in the review (776 participants in the low tidal volume group and 772 in the high volume group). There are four studies awaiting classification and three are ongoing. All included studies were at some risk of bias. Participants were scheduled for abdominal surgery, heart surgery, pulmonary thromboendarterectomy, spinal surgery and knee surgery. Low tidal volumes used in the studies varied from 6 mL/kg to 8.1 mL/kg while high tidal volumes varied from 10 mL/kg to 12 mL/kg.Based on 12 studies including 1207 participants, the effects of low volume ventilation on 0- to 30-day mortality were uncertain (risk ratio (RR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 1.53; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). Based on seven studies including 778 participants, lower tidal volumes probably reduced postoperative pneumonia (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.82; I2 = 0%; moderate-quality evidence; NNTB 24, 95% CI 16 to 160), and it probably reduced the need for non-invasive postoperative ventilatory support based on three studies including 506 participants (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.64; moderate-quality evidence; NNTB 13, 95% CI 11 to 24). Based on 11 studies including 957 participants, low tidal volumes during surgery probably decreased the need for postoperative invasive ventilatory support (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.77; I2 = 0%; NNTB 39, 95% CI 30 to 166; moderate-quality evidence). Based on five studies including 898 participants, there may be little or no difference in the intensive care unit length of stay (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.06, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.10; I2 = 33%; low-quality evidence). Based on 14 studies including 1297 participants, low tidal volumes may have reduced hospital length of stay by about 0.8 days (SMD -0.15, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.00; I2 = 27%; low-quality evidence). Based on five studies including 708 participants, the effects of low volume ventilation on barotrauma (pneumothorax) were uncertain (RR 1.77, 95% CI 0.52 to 5.99; I2 = 0%; very low-quality evidence). We found moderate-quality evidence that low tidal volumes (defined as less than 10 mL/kg) decreases pneumonia and the need for postoperative ventilatory support (invasive and non-invasive). We found no difference in the risk of barotrauma (pneumothorax), but the number of participants included does not allow us to make definitive statement on this. The four studies in 'Studies awaiting classification' may alter the conclusions of the review once assessed.

Intraoperative use of low volume ventilation to decrease postoperative mortality, mechanical ventilation, lengths of stay and lung injury in patients without acute lung injury.

During the last decade, there has been a trend towards decreasing tidal volumes for positive pressure ventilation during surgery. It is not known whether this new trend is beneficial or harmful for patients. To assess the benefit of intraoperative use of low tidal volume ventilation (< 10 mL/kg of predicted body weight) to decrease postoperative complications. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2014, Issue 9), MEDLINE (OvidSP) (from 1946 to 5 September 2014) and EMBASE (OvidSP) (from 1974 to 5 September 2014). We included all parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effect of low tidal volumes (defined as < 10 mL/kg) on any of our selected outcomes in adult participants undergoing any type of surgery. We did not retain studies with participants requiring one-lung ventilation. Two authors independently assessed the quality of the retained studies with the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. We analysed data with both fixed-effect (I(2) statistic < 25%) or random-effects (I(2) statistic > 25%) models based on the degree of heterogeneity. When there was an effect, we calculated a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) using the odds ratio. When there was no effect, we calculated the optimal size information. We included 12 studies in the review. In total these studies detailed 1012 participants (499 participants in the low tidal volume group and 513 in the high volume group). All studies included were at risk of bias as defined by the Cochrane tool. Based on nine studies including 899 participants, we found no difference in 0- to 30-day mortality between low and high tidal volume groups (risk ratio (RR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 1.54; I(2) statistic 0%; low quality evidence). Based on four studies including 601 participants undergoing abdominal or spinal surgery, we found a lower incidence of postoperative pneumonia in the lower tidal volume group (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.99; I(2) statistic 19%; moderate quality evidence; NNTB 19, 95% CI 14 to 169). Based on two studies including 428 participants, low tidal volumes decreased the need for non-invasive postoperative ventilatory support (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.64; moderate quality evidence; NNTB 11, 95% CI 9 to 19). Based on eight studies including 814 participants, low tidal volumes during surgery decreased the need for postoperative invasive ventilatory support (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.80; I(2) statistic 0%; NNTB 36, 95% CI 27 to 202; moderate quality evidence). Based on three studies including 650 participants, we found no difference in the intensive care unit length of stay (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.01, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.20; I(2) statistic = 42%; moderate quality evidence). Based on eight studies including 846 participants, we did not find a difference in hospital length of stay (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.07; I(2) statistic 52%; moderate quality evidence). A meta-regression showed that the effect size increased proportionally to the peak pressure measured at the end of surgery in the high volume group. We did not find a difference in the risk of pneumothorax (RR 2.01, 95% CI 0.51 to 7.95; I(2) statistic 0%; low quality evidence). Low tidal volumes (defined as < 10 mL/kg) should be used preferentially during surgery. They decrease the need for postoperative ventilatory support (invasive and non-invasive). Further research is required to determine the maximum peak pressure of ventilation that should be allowed during surgery.

Laparoscopic or Laparoscopic-Assisted Pelvic Surgery in Small Infants: Our Experience

The objective of this study was to review our experience of laparoscopic (LA) or laparoscopic-assisted pelvic surgery (LAPS) in small infants. The medical records of 35 patients who underwent an LA or LAPS between January 2007 and June 2010 were studied and 21 patients who were younger than 1 year or whose weight was less than 10 kg were included. Indications, procedures, results, and complications were analyzed. The indications of surgery and procedures done were impalpable undescended testes (7 cases--3 single-stage orchidopexy and 4 Fowler Stephen stage I ligation of testicular vessels), Hirschsprung's disease (HD; 5 cases--all laparoscopic-assisted transanal pull-through), anorectal malformation (ARM; 3 cases--all laparoscopic-assisted pull-through), disorders of sexual differentiation (3 cases--1 herniotomy and 2 gonadal biopsy), sacrococcygeal teratoma (1 case--laparoscopic mobilization of pelvic component and posterior sagittal excision), and ovarian mass (2 cases; laparoscopic oophorectomy). There were 14 males, 4 females, and 3 of indeterminate sex. All procedures could be successfully completed without conversion. There was no anesthesia-related complication or need for postoperative ventilatory support. There were no immediate procedure-related complications. One female child with ARM had rectal mucosal prolapse; 1 HD case had rectovaginal fistula that healed following fecal diversion. The major advantages of laparoscopy in different indications were magnified access into the depth of pelvis and early frozen section biopsies in HD, accurate placement of neoanus in the center of muscle complex in ARM, early ligation of vessels and avoidance of laparotomy in sacrococcygeal teratoma, ease of decision making and better mobilization of vessels in undescended testes, and diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic procedure in ambiguous genitalia. Laparoscopic pelvic surgery in small infants is a safe procedure with advantage of magnification, access, and cosmesis.

Predictors of Prolonged Postoperative Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy for Lung Resection

The aim of this study was to identify predictors of delayed endotracheal extubation defined as the need for postoperative ventilatory support after open thoracotomy for lung resection. An observational cohort investigation. A tertiary referral center. The study population consisted of 2,068 patients who had open thoracotomy for pneumonectomy, lobectomy, or segmental lung resection between January 1996 and December 2005. Not applicable. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were collected concurrently with the patient's care. Risk factors were identified using logistic regression with stepwise variable selection procedure on 1,000 bootstrap resamples, and a bagging algorithm was used to summarize the results. Intraoperative red blood cell transfusion, higher preoperative serum creatinine level, absence of a thoracic epidural catheter, more extensive surgical resection, and lower preoperative FEV(1) were associated with an increased risk of delayed extubation after lung resection. Most predictors of delayed postoperative extubation (ie, red blood cell transfusion, higher preoperative serum creatinine, lower preoperative FEV(1), and more extensive lung resection) are difficult to modify in the perioperative period and probably represent greater severity of underlying lung disease and more advanced comorbid conditions. However, thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia is a modifiable factor that was associated with reduced odds for postoperative ventilatory support. Thus, the use of epidural analgesia may reduce the need for post-thoracotomy mechanical ventilation.

Early morbidity after pancreas transplantation

This study aims to evaluate and compare the early outcome of both pancreas-alone transplantation (PTA) and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SPKT) focusing on the complications affecting the first month after the procedures. The records of all patients who underwent PTA or SPKT were reviewed. We considered the length of ICU stay, the need for postoperative ventilatory support, hemodynamic and metabolic data (arterial pH, serum glucose, need for exogenous insulin), infectious diseases incidence, microbiological colonization rate and any kind of postoperative complication arising during the first month after the transplantation. PTA recipients underwent a quicker surgery (P < 0.01) with shorter ICU stay (P < 0.05) and a lower need for postoperative mechanical ventilation (P < 0.05). They also had a higher hemodynamic stability (P < 0.05) with less cardiological complications (P < 0.05) in the intra- and postoperative phases; bacterial colonisation was also less frequent in PTA recipients (P < 0.05). On the contrary, no significant difference was noted with regard to postoperative nausea/vomiting, sudden myocardial death, ICU re-admissions, graft function, rate of rejection, grafts explantation and re-transplantation. PTA could be considered as preemptive for severe diabetic complications in patients with long-lasting severe type I diabetes. However, establishing the correct timing of PTA is of paramount importance in order not to expose the patients early to risks arising from a major surgery and heavy immunosuppressive treatments.

Naloxone reversal of opioid anesthesia revisited: clinical evaluation and plasma concentration analysis of continuous naloxone infusion after anesthesia with high-dose fentanyl.

In spite of several advantages, the need for postoperative ventilatory support limits the use of high-dose opioid anesthesia. We prospectively evaluated the effectiveness of naloxone infusion for the reversal of high-dose fentanyl anesthesia. Anesthesia was maintained with fentanyl in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. After anesthesia, the trachea was extubated when intravenous naloxone, which was titrated in separate 50- micro g doses, established an acceptable level of consciousness and arterial blood gas (ABG) status under spontaneous respiration; this was followed by continuous infusion started at the rate of the sum of the bolus doses per hour. The naloxone infusion was terminated based on evaluation of the level of consciousness, ABG, and acute abstinence symptoms. Postoperative pain was evaluated using self-reported four-step categorical terms (none, mild, moderate, and severe). Plasma concentrations of fentanyl and naloxone were analyzed in 12 patients, using high-performance liquid chromatography. Fifty-seven out of 59 eligible patients were successfully extubated at 34 +/- 14 min after termination of fentanyl (total dose, 127 +/- 64 micro g.kg(-1); mean +/- SD) with naloxone (total bolus, 3.4 +/- 2.6 micro g.kg(-1)). All these patients recovered fully without ventilatory support under the naloxone infusion, which was terminated at 11 +/- 7 h. The reduction of the naloxone infusion rate effectively relieved the increased pain, and no supplemental analgesic was used in any patients during the naloxone infusion. Pharmacokinetic analysis did not indicate any correlations between plasma fentanyl and naloxone concentrations. The results suggest that naloxone infusion with individual dose titration facilitates the use of high-dose opioid anesthesia, maintaining the advantager of this anesthesia.

The fate of colonic suture lines in high-risk trauma patients: a prospective analysis

Background: Some authors have stated that virtually all patients with penetrating colon injuries can be safely managed with primary repair. The purpose of this study is to test the applicability of this statement to all trauma patients by evaluating a protocol of liberal primary repair applied to a group of patients at high risk of septic complications. Study Design: We performed a prospective analysis of a liberal policy of primary repair applied to patients at high risk of developing postoperative septic complications admitted to a Level I urban trauma center. Inclusion criteria were full-thickness colon injury and at least one of three additional risk factors: 1) Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI) of 25 or more; 2) 6 U or more of blood transfused; and 3) 6 hours or longer elapsed between injury and surgery. Results: Of 56 patients studied (55 male, 1 female, average age 28.8 years, mean PATI 35.3), the vast majority had gunshot wounds as the mechanism of injury (89%), PATI 25 or more (95%), multiple blood transfusions (77%), an Injury Severity Score greater than 15 (66%), and a need for postoperative ventilatory support in the surgical intensive care unit (61%). Of 56 patients, 49 (88%) had at least one colonic suture line, and 25 patients (45%) had destructive colon injuries requiring resection. Intraabdominal infections occurred in 15 (27%) of 56 patients and colon suture line disruption occurred in 3 (6%) of 49. Two of these patients developed multisystem organ failure, and death was directly related to breakdown of their colonic anastomosis. Conclusions: On the basis of these data and the relative infrequency of patients in prospective randomized trials with destructive colon injuries, we believe there is still room for consideration of fecal diversion in patients in high-risk categories with destructive colon injuries requiring resection.

Oesophageal atresia: Caudo-thoracic epidural anaesthesia reduces the need for postoperative ventilatory support: A.T. Bösenberg, G.P. Hadley, and R. Wiersma, Pediatr Surg Int 7: 289–291, (June), 1992

Oesophageal atresia: Caudo-thoracic epidural anaesthesia reduces the need for postoperative ventilatory support: A.T. Bösenberg, G.P. Hadley, and R. Wiersma, Pediatr Surg Int 7: 289–291, (June), 1992

Oesophageal atresia: caudo-thoracic epidural anaesthesia reduces the need for post-operative ventilatory support

The mortality of neonates with oesophageal atresia in the Third World remains high because of delays in presentation and diagnosis. Lack of appropriate intensive care facilities is a further contributing factor. Caudothoracic epidural anaesthesia was used during surgical repair of oesophageal atresia in 35 patients in an attempt to minimise the need for post-operative ventionally support. This group was compared with 36 patients whose surgery was performed under general anaesthesia. The age at the time of referral, sex ratio, and weight were comparable in both groups. Using the Waterson classification, a greater number of poorer prognostic patients were seen in the epidural group (P <0.02). In all Waterson risk categories fewer patients required ventionally support post-operatively, which was statistically significant (P <0.01) when all categories were combined. We are encouraged by our results and believe this technique has a role in the management of neonates undergoing major surgery, both where neonatal intensive care exist or is deficient as in many parts of the Third World.

Gastroduodenal perforation after open heart surgery

During a thirty month period, 319 patients underwent open heart operations, and of these, three experienced a life-threatening explosive abdominal catastrophe. Aggressive radiographic maneuvers established the diagnosis of gastroduodenal perforation. Appropriate abdominal surgery with plication of the perforation and, whenever possible, the establishment of tube gastrostomy for decompression and a tube jejunostomy for feeding is desirable. All three patients required mechanical ventilatory support and tracheostomy prior to the abdominal catastrophe. Prophylactic antacids and sedation seem appropriate, particularly for selected patients (those with a prior peptic history and those with pulmonary dysfunction). Pulmonary toilet for those identified by preoperative pulmonary screening may circumvent the need for postoperative ventilatory support, which increases the risk of stress ulceration. Of the three patients described, all survived the gastrointestinal surgery but only one left the hospital. One died twenty days and another forty-eight days after the intestinal surgery, both of pneumonitis and septicemia.