Neck Surgery Clinic Research Articles

Reciprocity for patients with head and neck cancer participating in an instrument development project.

To examine reciprocity (i.e., a mutual exchange of benefit) in study participation via a thematic analysis of field notes on study participation from a parent psychometric study. Qualitative. Head and neck surgery clinic in an urban tertiary hospital. Seven patients with head and neck cancer recruited to participate in an instrument development project. Symbolic interactionism was employed to frame the examination of field notes from observations and interactions with patients, as well as participant notes accompanying returned retest questionnaires. Analysis relied on the constant comparative technique at the levels of open and axial coding. Participation in an instrument development project. Four content themes emerged in the analysis: Willingness to Help, Reassurance That the Deficits Patients Experience Are Common, Participation Provides Social Contact, and Confirmation of Clinically Significant Findings. A process theme, Unveiling the Experience, integrated the content themes in relation to participation itself. The role of the study nurse appears to be pivotal in this process. A notion of reciprocity in research participation is apparent. The role of the study nurse is an important element in the process of reciprocity. This role should be explored to enhance study participation. Implications, particularly for clinical trial nurses, include recasting the benefits of participating in research, better addressing preparation for patients scheduled to receive treatment for head and neck cancer, and exploring and enhancing the role of the study nurse.

Merkel cell carcinoma arising in the head and neck: optimizing therapy.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine dermal neoplasm. Because of the limited number of cases described in the literature (approximately 600 to date), statistically significant data regarding treatment are difficult to obtain. The majority of MCC cases affect the head and neck and are thought to be caused by the actinic damage associated with sun exposure. This study evaluates cases of head and neck MCC at Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD) and compares the treatment regimens and outcomes from multiple institutions. This study is a retrospective outcomes analysis of all cases of head and neck MCC seen at NMCSD, between January 1, 1988 and June 30, 1998. The records of the NMCSD Tumor Registry were searched for patients with that diagnosis, and supplemental information was retrieved from the Radiation Oncology and Head & Neck Surgery Clinic charts. Eight of nine patients in this study were treated with either wide-local excision or Mohs microsurgery. The surgical margins were free of disease in all eight patients. One patient presented with distant metastatic disease, and two others were subsequently found to have nodal involvement. Subsequent therapy varied among the patients. Survey of the available literature revealed inconsistency in terms of which treatment regimens are optimal. Tumor resections are recommended by most groups to include a 2-cm to 3-cm tumor-free margin around the primary lesion when possible, but this is often difficult to achieve in the head and neck. Data, which do not reach statistical significance, suggest improved outcomes with tumor-free margins. Treatment of the regional draining lymph nodes is also recommended in most series. Prophylactic lymph node dissection or radiation therapy to the nodal chain may decrease local recurrence but does not consistently affect overall survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy is advocated by most groups in the treatment of metastatic disease because MCC is pathologically similar to small-cell lung carcinoma. However, no chemotherapy protocol has been shown to improve survival. Head and neck MCC is a rare and aggressive dermal tumor of neuroendocrine origin that requires multimodality therapy, including surgery, radiation therapy, and possibly adjuvant chemotherapy. Multiinstitutional studies are crucial to obtain sufficiently large populations to investigate and optimize therapy in this disease.

Fine needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland lesions reported immediately in a head and neck clinic

This paper describes the application of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) performed on 92 patients with salivary gland lesions in a Head and Neck Surgery Clinic. The aspirates were immediately reported by a cytopathologist and the reports conveyed to the surgeon during the same clinic visit. FNAC results were then compared with histology in those patients who underwent surgery and with the clinical course of the disease at subsequent clinic visits in patients where surgery was not performed. The cytological diagnosis was incorrect in five cases, one of which was a false negative result. There were no false positive results. The sensitivity was 90.9 per cent and the specificity 100 per cent. This rapid report system of fine needle aspiration cytology has been found to be safe, free of complications, and helpful in the planning of treatment.