Diagnosis Of Neck Pain Research Articles

Simplified Chinese version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for patients with neck pain: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.

The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Core Outcome Measures Index for (COMI) into a Simplified Chinese version (COMI-SC) and to evaluate the reliability and validity of COMI-SC in patients with neck pain. The COMI-neck was translated into Chinese according to established methods. The COMI-neck questionnaire was then completed by 122 patients with a hospital diagnosis of neck pain. Reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was assessed by correlating the COMI-neck with the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the VAS and the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36). Using confirmatory factor analysis to validate the structural, convergent and discriminant validity of the questionnaire. The COMI-neck total scores were well distributed, with no floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.861). Moderate to substantial correlations were found between COMI-neck and NPDS (r = 0.420/0.416/0.437, P < 0.001), NDI (r = 0.890, P < 0.001), VAS (r = 0.845, P < 0.001), as well as physical function (r = - 0.989, P < 0.001), physical role (r = - 0.597, P < 0.001), bodily pain (r = - 0. 639, P < 0.001), general health (r = - 0.563, P < 0.001), vitality (r = - 0.702, P < 0.001), social functioning (r = - 0.764, P < 0.001), role emotional (r = - 0.675, P < 0.001) and mental health (r = - 0.507, P < 0.001) subscales of the SF-36. An exploratory factor analysis revealed that the 3-factor loading explained 71.558% of the total variance [Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (KMO) = 0.780, C2 = 502.82, P < 0.001]. CMIN/DF = 1.813, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.966 (> 0.9), Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.982 (> 0.9), Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.961 (> 0.9), RMSEA = 0.082 (< 0.5) indicating that the model fits well. COMI-neck was shown to have acceptable reliability and validity in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain and could be recommended for patients in mainland China. Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Non-specific neck pain (cervicalgia). Guidelines of the Russian Society for the Study of Pain (RSSP)

Neck pain (NP) is one of the most common complaints of patients in outpatient practice and is predominantly non-specific (musculoskeletal) in nature. When examining a patient with NP, it is necessary to rule out a specific cause of the condition. The diagnosis of nonspecific NP (NNP) is based on a clinical examination that excludes signs of specific NP (“red flags”). If there are no signs of specific NP (“red flags”), early (in the first 4 weeks) magnetic resonance imaging is not indicated. It is recommended to inform the patient with NNP about the favorable prognosis of the disease, its risk factors, avoidance of prolonged excessive static and physical activity, incorrect (non-physiological) positions and postures, the effectiveness of therapeutic exercises (kinesiotherapy) and the advisability of maintaining physical activity. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and muscle relaxants can be used to relieve NNP. For subacute and chronic NNP, kinesiotherapy, manual therapy in combination with psychological therapy methods (for depressive and anxiety disorders, pain catastrophizing, pain behavior), and antidepressants are recommended. Radiofrequency denervation may be effective for chronic NNP associated with cervical facet joint pathology. There are no convincing data on the efficacy of electrotherapy, ultrasound, traction, and wearing a cervical collar in the absence of orthopedic indications. For preventive treatment of NNP, kinesiotherapy and an educational program to avoid excessive static and physical activity, incorrect positions and postures are recommended. The issues of duration and frequency of therapeutic exercises for the treatment and prevention of NNP need further investigation.

The Impact of the Addition of a Physical Therapy Assistant to the Treatment Team for Management of Neck Pain: A Retrospective Analysis of Outpatient Physical Therapy Clinics.

Introduction The impact of physical therapy assistants (PTAs) on patient outcomes, mostly in the acute and subacute setting, is well known in the literature. However, no study to date has examined the impact of using PTAs as part of a treatment team in the outpatient setting for common musculoskeletal conditions. The purpose of this study is to determine if physical therapy team composition, either physical therapists (PTs) only or a team consisting of PTs and PTAs, has a significant impact on patient outcomes in adult patients with musculoskeletal neck pain to help investigate an ideal practice pattern for outpatient physical therapy. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study analyzing the impact of physical therapy treatment team composition (PTs only, or team consisting of PTs and PTAs) on pain, active range-of-motion (AROM), and disability outcomes via the Neck Disability Index (NDI) in the conservative treatment of neck pain. All patients were treated with usual physical therapy care. Inclusion criteria involved patients with a diagnosis of neck pain (M48.2), older than 18 years old, a physical therapy evaluation procedure code (97161, 97162, 97163), and at least two visits per bout of physical therapy. Primary outcome measures were pain, bilateral rotation AROM, disability, and number of visits. Results Included patients (n=195) had an average age of 60.8 years ± 16.1 years with an average number of total physical therapy visits of 7.4 visits ± 4.3 visits (range, 2 visits - 22 visits) with 120 patients (61.5%) treated by a PT only (PT-only group) and 75 patients (38.5%) treated by a team consisting of a PT and a PTA (PTA group). The PT-only group had significantly fewer visits than the PTA group (p<0.001). The PT-only group had a pain improvement of 2.1 points ± 2.3 points whereas the PTA group had a pain improvement of 2.2 points ± 2.4 points with no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.573). The PT-only group (n=46 patients) had an average rotation AROM improvement of 20.0 ± 17.4 degrees whereas the PTA group (n=40 patients) had an average rotation AROM improvement of 16.8 degrees ± 23.0 degrees with no significant difference between the level of rotation AROM improvement between the two groups (p=0.408). Furthermore, there was also no significant difference in the amount of NDI improvement seen in both groups (p=0.594). Conclusion There was no significant difference in patient outcomes for pain, AROM, and disability when PTAs were added to the physical therapy treatment team in the conservative management of neck pain in the outpatient setting. However, patients treated with a treatment team consisting of PTAs had significantly more visits, despite no significant change in outcomes. Randomized controlled trials are needed as the reasons for these findings can be many and require further research.

Effects of Pain Localization and Duration on Disability and Quality of Life among Individuals with Neck Pain

Purpose: This study aimed to identify effects of pain characteristics on disability and quality of life.&#x0D; Methods : 208 patients with non-specific neck pain diagnosis were included in the study. Patients’ resting, activity and sleep pain intensities were evaluated with Visual Analog Scale . Effects of demographic and clinical data on quality of life and pain were evaluated with Neck Disability Index, Short Form-36 and the Neck OutcOme Score. The data were analyzed in SPSS 11.5 Windows edition. Statistical significance level was accepted to be 0.05.&#x0D; Results: As pain localizations expanded, individuals’ pain scores were higher while their scores of general health such as activities, participation and quality of life were found to be lower. Whereas individuals with chronic pain had higher pain scores, their scores of general health such as mobility, sleep disorder, social functionality and quality of life were found to be lower.&#x0D; Conclusion: Neck pain duration and localization affect individuals’ quality of life and disability.

Clinical Approach to Diagnosing and Treatment of Neck Pain

Background: Neck pain is one of the most common reasons patients seek treatment in the hospital. The causes of neck pain vary widely, trigger misdiagnosis, and often result in mistreatment. Misdiagnoses and mistreatment-related neck pain diagnoses are often associated with a diagnosis of cervical herniated disc. The implication of the misdiagnosis is the use of excessive investigations and inappropriate therapy. This review aims to determine the causes of neck pain often obtained in daily practice and how to diagnose and treat it. Method: Search relevant articles on clinical diagnosis of neck pain with the keywords neck pain diagnostic therapy using Medline and PubMed databases. Results: Neck pain can be in the form of axial pain, which is mostly related to disorders of the joints and muscles of the neck, or in the form of pain in the roots and spinal cord. Investigations and therapy must be related to the clinical diagnosis of neck pain experienced by patients with a history of neck pain. Conclusion: Neck pain is one of the most common complaints encountered in outpatient department settings, associated with reduced quality of life. Patients may come with differing degrees of pain, various symptoms, and aetiologies making it quite challenging to treat them into complete remission. Despite being frequently encountered, some patients with neck pain are underdiagnosed and undertreated due to failure to understand the clinical symptoms before deciding possible aetiologies.

Assessment of Neck Muscle Shear Modulus Normalization in Women with and without Chronic Neck Pain

Identifying the objective stiffness of the neck muscles facilitates the early and specific diagnosis of neck pain and targeted therapy. However, individual variation in the muscle shear modulus obscures differences between healthy and diseased individuals. Normalization may improve the comparability between individuals. The shear modulus at different functional tasks served as a reference for normalizing the neck muscles’ shear modulus of 38 women, 20 with chronic neck pain and 18 asymptomatic. Reference tasks were maximal voluntary contraction, relaxed sitting, prone head lift, balancing 1 kg on the head, and neck extension at 48 N. The effects of normalization on within-group variation and between-group differences were compared. Normalization with maximal voluntary contraction was discarded due to imaging problems. Normalization with relaxed sitting, prone head lift, balancing 1 kg, and neck extension at 48 N reduced within-group variation, by 23.2%, 26.8%, 11.6%, and 33.6%, respectively. All four normalization approaches reduced the p-values when testing for between-group differences. For the pain group, normalization with relaxed sitting and head lift indicated less normalized muscle stiffness, while normalization with balancing 1 kg and extension at 48 N indicated higher stiffness. The contradictory results are explainable by non-significant group differences in the reference tasks. Normalization of the muscle shear modulus is effective to reduce within-group variation, but a trustworthy normalization approach for group comparisons has yet to be identified.

Recurrent cervical osteomyelitis after radiation therapy in a patient with oropharyngeal cancer.

It is crucial to consider cervical osteomyelitis as a differential diagnosis for neck pain in patients who underwent radiotherapy for early diagnosis and management, thereby preventing the development of potentially debilitating neurologic symptoms.

Validation of a clinical examination to differentiate a cervicogenic source of headache: a diagnostic prediction model using controlled diagnostic blocks

ObjectivesNeck pain commonly accompanies recurrent headaches such as migraine, tension-type and cervicogenic headache. Neck pain may be part of the headache symptom complex or a local source. Patients commonly seek...

Visceral Origin: An Underestimated Source of Neck Pain. A Systematic Scoping Review.

The diagnosis of neck pain is challenging. Many visceral disorders are known to cause it, and clinical practice guidelines recommend to rule them out during neck pain diagnosis. However, the absence of suspicion of any cause impedes one from establishing that specific aetiology as the final diagnosis. To investigate the degree of consideration given to visceral aetiology, a systematic search of trials about neck pain was carried out to evaluate their selection criteria. The search yielded 309 eligible articles, which were screened by two independent reviewers. The PEDro scale score was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. The following information was retrieved: number of authors affiliated to a clinical or non-clinical institution, number of citations in the Web of Science, study aims, characteristics of participants, and eligibility criteria. The top 15 most cited trials, and the 15 most recent studies about treatment efficacy in neck pain, published in first quartile journals of the Journal Citation Reports, were selected. Females represented 67.5% of participants. A single study was of poor methodological quality (4/10). Based on the eligibility criteria of the articles that were systematically reviewed, it would appear that visceral aetiology was not considered in eighty percent of the trials on neck pain, showing a low level of suspicion both in research and clinical settings.

What a pain in the neck: Crowned dens syndrome as an uncommon cause of neck pain

Introduction: Crowned Dens Syndrome is an uncommon manifestation of calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease caused by crystal deposition and associated inflammation in the C1 and C2 area of the spine. Crowded Dens Syndrome typically causes posterior neck pain and limitation in range of motion. This report describes a case of this unusual and challenging diagnosis and its importance in the differential diagnosis of neck pain. Case Report: An 80-year-old woman presented as a transfer from another hospital for evaluation for possible epidural abscess. She noted several weeks of progressive posterior cervical neck pain. The pain was worse with passive motion, especially flexion, and she had decreased range of motion in all directions. She had elevated inflammatory markers, and neck computed tomography (CT) scan was non-diagnostic. Broad-spectrum antibiotics for treatment of a possible abscess or meningitis were initiated without improvement. After arrival at our hospital, a dual-energy CT scan concentrated at the C1–C2 area was performed. This imaging revealed multiple calcific deposits surrounding the odontoid with associated soft tissue thickening consistent with Crowned Dens Syndrome due to calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. She improved with steroid treatment. Conclusion: Crowned Dens Syndrome presents similarly to infectious, malignant, and other inflammatory causes of neck pain. Because specific imaging is often necessary to make the diagnosis, clinical awareness and suspicion are essential for identifying this condition and prescribing the correct therapy.

Differential Diagnosis of Neck Pain: = Six Cases- of Calcific Tendinitis of the Longus Coli Muscle

Differential Diagnosis of Neck Pain: = Six Cases- of Calcific Tendinitis of the Longus Coli Muscle

An Approach to the Patient with Neck Pain

In the United States, neck pain is an extremely common reason for seeking medical attention. While symptoms can occur abruptly, they are often more indolent in their course, usually without any temporal relationship to trauma or other inciting events. For these reasons, physicians need to be well-versed in the initial evaluation and management of these complaints. It is important to have a working knowledge of the cervical anatomy, the differential diagnosis for neck pain, and the potential mimics which may present. It is equally imperative to hone the skills necessary to effectively differentiate localized, mechanical neck pain syndromes from those of a more serious etiology. To that end, identifying “red flags” during the patient’s history and performing a focused musculoskeletal and neurological examination is critical to triaging the patient appropriately. As the U.S. health care system moves away from traditional fee-for-service reimbursement, greater emphasis will be placed on providing high-quality, cost-conscious care. Physicians must be deliberate when evaluating a patient with neck pain, rather than ordering a “one size fits all” battery of tests. Knowing when to order advanced imaging modalities or refer a patient to a specialist will be paramount in providing the best patient care while responsibly utilizing resources.

Classification and Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Neck pain exerts a steep personal and socioeconomic toll, ranking as the fourth leading cause of disability. The principal determinant in treatment decisions is whether pain is neuropathic or nonneuropathic, as this affects treatment at all levels. Yet, no study has sought to classify neck pain in this manner. One hundred participants referred to an urban, academic military treatment facility with a primary diagnosis of neck pain were enrolled and followed up for 6 months. Pain was classified as neuropathic, possible neuropathic, or nonneuropathic using painDETECT and as neuropathic, mixed, or nociceptive by s-LANSS (self-completed Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs pain scale) and physician designation. Based on previous studies, the intermediate possible neuropathic pain category was considered to be a mixed condition. The final classification was based on a metric combining all 3 systems, slightly weighted toward physician's judgment, which is considered the reference standard. Fifty percent of participants were classified as having possible neuropathic pain, 43% as having nonneuropathic pain, and 7% with primarily neuropathic pain. Concordance was high between the various classification schemes, ranging from a low of 62% between painDETECT and physician designation for possible neuropathic pain, to 83% concordance between s-LANSS and the 2 other systems for neuropathic pain. Individuals with neuropathic pain reported higher levels of baseline disability, were more likely to have a coexisting psychiatric illness, and underwent surgery more frequently than other pain categories, but were also more likely to report greater reductions in disability after 6 months. Although pure neuropathic pain comprised a small percentage of our cohort, 50% of our population consisted of mixed pain conditions containing a possible neuropathic component. There was significant overlap between the various classification schemes.

Detection Rate of Intravascular Injections during Cervical Medial Branch Blocks: A Comparison of Digital Subtraction Angiography and Static Images from Conventional Fluoroscopy.

BackgroundThe most definitive diagnosis of neck pain caused by facet joints can be obtained through cervical medial branch blocks (CMBBs). However, intravascular injections need to be carefully monitored, as they can increase the risk of false-negative blocks when diagnosing cervical facet joint syndrome. In addition, intravascular injections can cause neurologic deficits such as spinal infarction or cerebral infarction. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is a radiological technique that can be used to clearly visualize the blood vessels from surrounding bones or dense soft tissues. The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of detection of intravascular injections during CMBBs using DSA and static images obtained through conventional fluoroscopy.MethodsSeventy-two patients were included, and a total of 178 CMBBs were performed. The respective incidences of intravascular injections during CMBBs using DSA and static images from conventional fluoroscopy were measured.ResultsA total of 178 CMBBs were performed on 72 patients. All cases of intravascular injections evidenced by the static images were detected by the DSAs. The detection rate of intravascular injections was higher from DSA images than from static images (10.7% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001).ConclusionsAccording to these findings, the use of DSA can improve the detection rate of intravascular injections during CMBBs. The use of DSA may therefore lead to an increase in the diagnostic and therapeutic value of CMBBs. In addition, it can decrease the incidence of potential side effects during CMBBs.

Cervical extensor endurance test: A reliability study

The purpose of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability in detecting the presence of weakness of the neck extensors and differentiate the presence of weakness of the superficial versus the deep neck extensors in a symptomatic population. The presence of weakness of the neck extensors has been described to cause pain and dysfunction in the cervical region. 30 patients with a diagnosis of neck pain were randomly assigned and examined by two musculoskeletal physical therapists at a time, in order to determine the presence of weakness of the superficial versus the deep neck extensors. With the patient lying prone and head and neck past the edge of the table and the cervico-thoracic junction stabilized, the ability of the individual to sustain a chin tuck position in neutral for 20s was evaluated. A positive finding for weakness of the deep neck extensors is the 'chin length' increasing with neck extension, as observed on the inclinometer, indicating a dominance of the superficial extensors of the neck. Weakness of both deep and superficial neck extensors was identified by the presence of neck flexion indicating an inability to hold the head up. Inter-rater reliability was determined using the Cohen's un-weighted kappa statistic. For the cervical extensor endurance test, the inter-rater reliability was 'very good' (k=0.800, SE of kappa=0.109, 95% CI). The cervical extensor endurance test may be incorporated as a simple yet effective test to determine the presence of weakness of the neck extensors and differentiate the presence of weakness of the superficial versus the deep neck extensors in a symptomatic population. The accuracy of the CEET as a test is still debatable, as it has not been compared to a diagnostic gold standard. Based on the results of this study, we speculate the CEET may still offer an initial sense of direction for clinicians treating neck dysfunction.

Economic Burden of Back and Neck Pain: Effect of a Neuropathic Component

This was a retrospective database analysis (2001-2009) of employees' medical, prescription drug, and absence costs and days from sick leave, short- and long-term disability, and workers' compensation. Employees with an ICD-9 diagnostic code for back or neck pain and an ICD-9 for a back- or neck-related neuropathic condition (eg, myelopathy, compression of the spinal cord, neuritis, radiculitis) or radiculopathy were considered to have nociceptive back or neck pain with a neuropathic component. Employees with an ICD-9 for back pain or neck pain and no ICD-9 for a back- or neck-related neuropathic condition or radiculopathy were defined to have nociceptive back or neck pain. Patients with nociceptive back or neck pain with a neuropathic component were classified as having or not having prior nociceptive pain. Annual costs (medical and prescription drug costs and absence costs) and days from sick leave, short- and long-term disability, and workers' compensation were evaluated. Mean annual total costs were highest ($8512) for nociceptive pain with a neuropathic component with prior nociceptive pain (n=9162 employees), $7126 for nociceptive pain with a neuropathic component with no prior nociceptive pain (n=5172), $5574 for nociceptive pain only (n=35,347), and $3017 for control employees with no back or neck pain diagnosis (n=226,683). Medical, short-term disability, and prescription drugs yielded the highest incremental costs compared to controls. Mean total absence days/year were 8.26, 7.86, 5.70, and 3.44, respectively. The economic burden of back pain or neck pain is increased when associated with a neuropathic component.

Congenital C1 arch deficiency: Grand Round presentation

We present an uncommon and yet interesting congenital anomaly and discuss the difficulties with diagnosis and controversies in management. C1 arch deficiency is an important consideration in the differential diagnosis of neck pain in children. A 12-year-old girl presented initially with a loud clicking emanating from the cervical spine during nappy changes in early childhood. Subsequent investigation by way of CT and MRI revealed her to have a deficient posterior arch of the C1 vertebra, and due to persistent and painful clicking she was placed into a cervical brace, which was worn for approximately 1 year. At age 12, her clicking had all but completely resolved but she continued to complain of minor neck pain. She is advised to avoid contact sports and her parents are instructed to observe any new worrying symptoms. No definitive guidelines exist for the management of this congenital anomaly. Indications for surgical intervention prior to any neurological disturbance are unclear, and restricting a child from partaking in healthy activity may not be necessary. We discuss the anomaly and identified management strategies as reported in the literature so far.

Not Just Another Pain in the Neck

A 56-year-old man presents to the emergency department with complaints of neck pain with numbness to the right upper extremity. The complaints and symptoms initially appear to be cervical radiculopathy but further diagnostic testing during an inpatient hospitalization revealed an unusual diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to bring awareness to practitioners of the alternative and sometimes rare diagnosis of neck pain. A detailed history and physical examination accompanied with diagnostic testing and collaboration can ensure a definitive diagnosis and positive outcome.

Osteoblastoma of C2 Corpus: 4 Years Follow-up

Osteoblastomas are rare neoplasms of the spine. The majority of the spinal lesions arise from the posterior elements and involvement of the corpus is usually by extension through the pedicles. An extremely rare case of isolated C2 corpus osteoblastoma is presented herein. A 9-year-old boy who presented with neck pain and spasmodic torticollis was shown to have a lesion within the corpus of C2. He underwent surgery via an anterior cervical approach and the completely-resected mass was reported to be an osteoblastoma. The pain resolved immediately after surgery and he had radiologic assessments on a yearly basis. He was symptom-free 4 years post-operatively with benign radiologic findings. Although rare, an osteoblastoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of neck pain and torticollis, especially in patients during the first two decades of life. The standard treatment for osteoblastomas is radical surgical excision because the recurrence rate is high following incomplete resection.

The Nature of Neck Pain in a Private Pain Clinic in the United States

To determine the prevalence of different causes of neck pain in a private practice clinic. A retrospective audit of records. A private spine pain clinic in the state of Washington, USA. All consecutive patients, seen between January 2003 and January 2005, in whom a diagnosis of neck pain was made. Interventions. The records of all patients were examined to determine the prevalence of various diagnostic entities determined by history, examination, and invasive test such as controlled diagnostic blocks and provocation discography. Using different denominators, the prevalence of various conditions was determined in all patients who presented with neck pain, in patients in whom investigations were undertaken, and in patients who completed investigations. A large proportion of patients (36%) did not pursue investigations, which diluted the crude prevalence of various conditions. A further 17% deferred completing investigations. Among the 46% of patients who completed investigations, the prevalence of zygapophysial joint pain was 55%, discogenic pain was 16%, and lateral atlanto-axial joint pain was 9%. A diagnosis remained elusive in only 32% of those patients who completed investigations. In a private practice setting, a patho-anatomic diagnosis for chronic neck pain can be established in over 80% of patients, provided that appropriate investigations are undertaken. The prevalence of cervical zygapophysial joint pain encountered in the present study corroborates the prevalence rates established in academic studies. Cervical discogenic pain does not appear to be common among patients with chronic neck pain.