Near Point Of Convergence Distance Research Articles

Baseline Computerized Neurocognitive Testing and Oculomotor Measures are not Altered by Hormonal Contraceptive Use.

Neurocognitive testing and oculomotor assessment have been an integral component to provide objective measures for sport-related concussion (SRC) detection and management. Hormonal contraceptive (HC) use is common among collegiate female athletes and may modify baseline SRC performance. The purpose was to examine the effects of HC use on baseline computerized neurocognitive testing (CNT) and oculomotor testing in college-aged individuals. A total of 63 participants (22 HC using females, 22 non-HC using females, 19 males) completed a baseline SRC battery consisting of CNT, near point of convergence (NPC), and the King-Devick (KD) test. CNT measures were composite scores of verbal and visual memory, visual motor processing speed and reaction time, impulse control, and cognitive efficiency index (CEI). NPC was measured as the average convergence distance across three trials. KD time was recorded as total time for each of the two trials and best trial marked as baseline. There were no group differences between HC, non-HC, and male control groups on all baseline CNT composite scores (p = .13-.98), impulse control (p = .47), and CEI (p = .49). NPC distance was similar between groups (p = .41), as well as KD time by trial (Trial 1 p = .65; 2 p = .48) and best time (p = .49). HC use does not appear to influence baseline SRC measures of neurocognition and oculomotor assessment. Clinicians should continue to consider the effects of modifying factors at baseline and post-concussion. Additional research is needed to better understand sex hormone levels and SRC performance measures.

The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening-Child (VOMS-C) tool for concussion evaluation in 5- to 9-year-old pediatric patients: preliminary evidence.

Vestibular and ocular motor dysfunction occurs in an estimated 60%-90% of concussion patients. The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool is validated for use in concussion patients older than 9 years. The goal of the current study was to adapt the current VOMS tool for a pediatric sample of children aged 5-9 years and establish its clinical utility in this patient population. In this case-control study, 80 symptomatic concussion patients (n = 33 [41%] female) aged 5-9 years (mean age 7.40 ± 1.09 years) and 40 (n = 18 [45%] female) age- and sex-matched uninjured controls (mean age 7.10 ± 1.26 years) completed the VOMS-Child (VOMS-C), a version of the VOMS adapted for younger patients. Differences in binary "yes" or "no" symptom provocation for headache, dizziness, and nausea/"tummy ache" across the 7 items of the VOMS-C, and near point of convergence (NPC) distance, were examined. Logistic regression (LR) models were built to classify concussion and controls. Predicted probabilities were generated from the LR model and entered into receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve models to generate area under the curve (AUC) values. VOMS-C item provocation ranged from 13% to 30% for concussed patients and 3% to 20% for controls. The LR model distinguished concussed participants from controls (R2 = 0.39; p < 0.001), with significant predictors being smooth pursuits, family depression history, and NPC distance. The ROC analysis had an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.89; p < 0.001) in the good range. Accurate diagnosis of concussion in the clinic setting requires comprehensive evaluation in multiple domains, including detailed clinical interview, neurocognitive testing, and vestibular/ocular motor assessment, regardless of patient age. Our results provide preliminary support for the VOMS-C as a developmentally appropriate tool for concussion management.

Optimizing VOMS for identifying acute concussion in collegiate athletes: Findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE consortium

The Vestibular/Ocular-Motor Screening (VOMS), an important component in acute (<72 h) sport-related concussion (SRC) assessment, is increasingly used alongside the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) and as part of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE2). VOMS demonstrates clinically useful diagnostic accuracy for acute SRC and improves the overall utility when added to the SCAT3. However, potential overlap among VOMS’s vestibular and oculomotor items suggests the possibility of a more efficient version. VOMS and SCAT3 scores were analyzed for 3,958 preseason (47.8% female) and 496 acute-SRC (37.5% female) NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education (CARE) consortium collegiate athlete evaluations. Analyses revealed very large effect sizes (d = 2.39–2.45) and high correlations (rho = 0.95–0.99) among all VOMS items except near point of convergence distance (d = 0.79, rho ≤ 0.341). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses showed clinically useful discriminative utility for VOMS Total (AUC = 0.85) and the VOMS Total change score, where pretest symptoms were incorporated (AUC = 0.81). A modified VOMS (mVOMS) consisting of four items (smooth pursuits, horizontal saccades, horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex, visual motion sensitivity) yielded identical AUCs to VOMS Total. Integer cutoff analyses suggest a score of ≥4 for VOMS Total and ≥4 for mVOMS Total optimizes concussion identification. Incorporating VOMS or mVOMS into SCAT3 (AUC = 0.79) significantly improved the combined tool’s acute utility for acute concussion identification by a maximum of 4% (SCAT3+VOMS AUC = 0.84, SCAT3+mVOMS AUC = 0.83). Future versions of SCAT or MACE may want to consider incorporating a more parsimonious VOMS for the purpose of identifying acute concussion.

A-30 Preliminary Evidence for the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening-Child (VOMS-C) for Patients with Concussion (ages 5–9)

Abstract Purpose: To establish preliminary evidence (i.e., predictive validity) for the new Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening Child Version (VOMS-C) in a sample of concussed patients and controls aged 5–9 years. A secondary purpose was to identify risk factors for false positives in healthy controls. Methods: This study included 80 patients ages 5–9 (7.40+/−1.09, 41% female) years with a concussion during the past 30 days recruited from a concussion clinic, and 40 age- and sex-matched controls (7.10+/−1.26 years, 45% female). Participants completed a clinical interview, and the VOMS-C. Groups were compared with independent samples t-tests and chi-square analyses. Backwards stepwise logistic regression (LR) was used to discriminate groups and inform a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with area under the curve (AUC) values. Chi-square analyses with odds ratios (OR) were conducted to examine false positives in controls. Results: VOMS-C item provocation ranged from 2.5–20% in the control group and 13.2–30.3% for the concussed group. Results from the LR discriminated concussed from controls (R2 = 0.39; p &amp;lt; 0.001) with smooth pursuits (p = 0.047), family depression history (p = 0.02), and near-point of convergence distance (p = 0.01), as significant predictors. ROC curve analysis including these three predictors supported an AUC = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73–0.89; p &amp;lt; 0.001) for differentiating concussed from controls. False positives among controls were only related to family history of anxiety (OR 13.37, CI 1.45–122.88, p = 0.007). Conclusions: The findings provide preliminary support for the VOMS-C to identify concussed patients aged 5–9 years.

Concurrent validity of the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) among adolescents with vestibular symptoms/impairment following concussion

ObjectiveTo determine whether the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool demonstrates concurrent validity with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) in a sample of concussed athletes referred for vestibular therapy and whether DHI items were predictive of VOMS outcomes. DesignCross-sectional cohort study. SettingConcussion specialty/vestibular therapy clinic. MethodsAdolescents (n = 55; 15.4 ± 1.6 years) with diagnosed sport-related concussion (SRC) with vestibular symptoms and/or impairment between October 2018–February 2020. Patients completed VOMS and DHI at initial visit. Seven individual VOMS and twenty-five DHI items, VOMS and DHI total score and three DHI sub-scales, were compared with Spearman correlations. Three backwards linear regression (LR) models were built to predict 1. VOMS vestibular symptoms, 2. VOMS ocular symptoms, and 3. near-point of convergence-distance (NPC-distance) using individual DHI items as predictors. ResultsSpearman correlations (p) identified DHI items with moderate to strong associations for VOMS items. DHI sub-scales demonstrated moderate-to-strong correlations with VOMS items (p = 0.30–0.59). Total DHI score demonstrated a moderate-to-strong association with HSAC (p = 0.30), VSAC (p = 0.32), and SP (p = 0.61). Results from the LRs predicting VOMS ocular symptoms (R (Alsalaheen et al., 2010) = 0.56; p < 0.001), and VOMS vestibular symptoms (R (Alsalaheen et al., 2010) = 0.23; p = 0.01), and NPC-distance (R (Alsalaheen et al., 2010) = 0.56; p < 0.001) included significant DHI predictors. ConclusionsThere was moderate-to-strong associations between VOMS and 56% of DHI items (i.e., p > 0.30).

Comparing Patient- and Clinician-Administered Near Point of Convergence After Concussion.

(1)To compare patient- and clinician-administered measurements of near point of convergence (NPC) distance including the percentage of patients exceeding clinical cutoffs among concussed adolescents and (2)to assess the reliability of patient- and clinician-measured NPC distances. A total of 762 patients (mean = 15.51, SD = 3.09y) within 30 days of concussion participated. The NPC distance was measured consecutively with the patient and clinician controlling the fixation target. The differences between patient (PT) and clinician (CLIN) measurements and cases exceeding cutoffs (ie,≥5cm) were examined with a series of t tests and chi-square tests, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients and unbiased estimate of reliability were performed. The NPC measurements were similar, t(761) = -.26, P = .79, between the PT (mean = 3.52, SD = 3.77cm) and CLIN (mean = 3.54, SD = 3.97cm) conditions. The number of measurements that exceeded cutoffs was similar among the PT (2.5%; 19/762) and CLIN conditions (3%; 23/762) (P = .10), and the number of measurements classified as abnormal/invalid was also similar among the PT (2.5%; 19/762) and CLIN conditions (3%; 23/762) (P = .10). There was excellent reliability between the methods (intraclass correlation coefficients = .85, unbiased estimate of reliability = .92). The findings support the application of this assessment in clinical settings where the clinician may not have direct contact with their patient and rely on the patient (eg,telehealth).

The Association between Baseline Eye Tracking Performance and Concussion Assessments in High School Football Players.

Concussions are complex injuries that require a multifaceted testing battery. Vision impairments are common after concussion, but it is unknown exactly how eye tracking may be affected after injury and how it is associated with other clinical concussion assessments. This study aimed to (1) examine the relationship between eye tracking performance (BOX score) and other common concussion evaluations, (2) identify if eye tracking adds novel information that augments baseline concussion evaluations, and (3) examine the effect of age, concussion history, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder on eye tracking and other ophthalmological measures. A total of 102 male high school football athletes (age, 16.0 years; 95% confidence interval, 15.8 to 16.2 years) completed a series of visual and neurocognitive tests during their pre-season baseline assessment. The main outcome measures were BOX score, near point of convergence (NPC) distance, binocular accommodative amplitude (BAA) distance, Standardized Assessment of Concussion score, and Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing composite scores. BOX score was not significantly associated with symptoms, Standardized Assessment of Concussion score, NPC distance, BAA distance, or any Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing composite scores. Age, concussion history, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and number of prior years playing football were not significantly associated with BOX score or NPC distance, but there was a significant association between concussion history and greater BAA distance (β = 1.60; 95% confidence interval = 0.19 to 3.01; P < .03). The BOX score cutoff of 10 resulted in a 12% false-positive rate. Eye tracking was not significantly associated with the commonly used clinical concussion assessments. These results suggest that an objective eye tracking variable may be a valuable addition to the current concussion battery.

Norm-Based Cutoffs as Predictors of Prolonged Recovery After Adolescent Sport-Related Concussion.

To identify predictors of prolonged recovery (ie, >28 days) using patient demographic factors and healthy, norm-based cutoffs on a multimodal test battery in adolescents after sport-related concussions (SRCs). Retrospective cohort. Patients were deemed recovered after successful completion of return-to-play/school protocols and received medical clearance. Community concussion clinic. Male and female adolescent student athletes diagnosed with a SRC and evaluated within 1 week of injury. Patient demographics, medical history, injury description, computerized neurocognitive testing, vestibular/ocular testing, and symptoms at initial clinical visit. Performance on clinical testing to predict recovery duration, classified as normal (<28 days) or prolonged (>28 days). A total of 201 adolescent student athletes (age = 15.3 ± 1.4 years) were included (female 35%). Average recovery duration for the entire cohort was 22.3 ± 13.3 days, with 22% (n = 45) of adolescent student athletes taking >28 days to recover. The final model was 88.3% accurate in classifying normal and prolonged recovery. Predictor variables included sex, loss of consciousness, history of ocular disorder, history of concussion, performance on visual motor speed composite, visual motion sensitivity symptom provocation and near point of convergence distance, number-naming total time, and symptom count. These findings suggest that using norm-based cutoffs from cognitive, oculomotor, and vestibulo-ocular testing and symptom reporting, clinicians can accurately predict a prolonged recovery (sensitivity = 81%) and normal recovery (specificity = 83%) in an adolescent, SRC cohort.

Discriminative Validity of Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening in Identifying Concussion Among Collegiate Athletes: A National Collegiate Athletic Association–Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education Consortium Study

Background: Vestibular and ocular motor screening tools, such as the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS), are recognized as important components of a multifaceted evaluation of sport-related concussion. Previous research has supported the predictive utility of the VOMS in identifying concussion, but researchers have yet to examine the predictive utility of the VOMS among collegiate athletes in the first few days after injury. Purpose: To determine the discriminative validity of individual VOMS item scores and an overall VOMS score for identifying collegiate athletes with an acute sport-related concussion (≤72 hours) from healthy controls matched by age, sex, and concussion history. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Participants (N = 570) aged 17 to 25 years were included from 8 institutions of the National Collegiate Athletic Association–Department of Defense CARE Consortium (Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education): 285 athletes who were concussed (per current consensus guidelines) and 285 healthy controls matched by age, sex, and concussion history. Participants completed the VOMS within 3 days of injury (concussion) or during preseason (ie, baseline; control). Symptoms are totaled for each VOMS item for an item score (maximum, 40) and totaled across items for an overall score (maximum, 280), and distance (centimeters) for near point of convergence (NPC) is averaged across 3 trials. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the area under the curve (AUC) was performed on cutoff scores using Youden index (J) for each VOMS item, overall VOMS score, and NPC distance average. A logistic regression was conducted to identify which VOMS scores identified concussed status. Results: A symptom score ≥1 on each VOMS item and horizontal vestibular/ocular reflex ≥2 significantly discriminated concussion from control (AUC, 0.89-0.90). NPC distance did not significantly identify concussion from control (AUC, 0.51). The VOMS overall score had the highest accuracy (AUC, 0.91) for identifying sport-related concussion from control. Among the individual items, vertical saccades ≥1 and horizontal vestibular/ocular reflex ≥2 best discriminated concussion from control. Conclusion: The findings indicate that individual VOMS items and overall VOMS scores are useful in identifying concussion in collegiate athletes within 3 days of injury. Clinicians can use the cutoffs from this study to help identify concussion in collegiate athletes.

Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening Assessment Outcomes After Sport-Related Concussion in High School and Collegiate Athletes.

Vestibular and ocular motor assessment is an emerging clinical assessment for patients with sport-related concussion (SRC). The increased use of these assessments by clinicians calls for the examination of outcomes that may affect clinical practice. To compare vestibular and ocular motor impairments in high school and collegiate athletes within 72 hours of SRC and examine the distribution of impairments in these populations based on pre-established clinical cutoff scores. Cross-sectional study. High school and collegiate athletics. Data were collected from 110 athletes (high school: n = 47, age = 15.40 ± 1.35 years; college: n = 63, age = 19.46 ± 1.28 years) within 72 hours of sustaining an SRC. Total and change scores were calculated for the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool, along with average near point of convergence (NPC) distance. Separate Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare group differences, and χ2 analyses were used to examine the proportion of athletes with scores greater than clinical cutoff scores for all VOMS outputs. The α level was set a priori at .05. No differences were found between high school and collegiate athletes for VOMS total and change scores and NPC distance. A larger proportion of the sample had scores greater than the cutoff for all total scores (P < .001) and change scores in horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex (59.01%; P < .001), vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex (60.91%; P < .001), and visual motion sensitivity (60.91%; P < .001). However, a larger proportion demonstrated smooth pursuit change scores (85.45%; P < .001) and NPC distances (73.64%; P = .01) that were less than the cutoff scores. During the acute phase of SRC, high school and collegiate athletes presented with similar vestibular and ocular motor impairments as measured using the VOMS, but vestibular tasks appeared to cause greater symptom provocation. Lastly, VOMS change scores may offer more clinical utility compared with total scores in assessing specific impairments after SRC.

Is near point of convergence associated with symptom profiles or recovery in adolescents after concussion?

Our purpose was to compare the clinical and injury characteristics of concussion patients with a receded near point of convergence (NPC) vs those without a receded NPC. Concussion patients were seen within 14 days of injury. We compared those with receded a NPC (>6 cm) break point distance and those with a normal NPC distance on symptom, behavioral, and clinical assessments. We also compared NPC break points between those who did/did not recover within 28 days of injury. 123 patients completed the assessment. 77/123 (63%) of participants demonstrated a receded NPC when tested within 14 days of injury. Those with receded a NPC break point (n = 77; mean = 14.9, SD = 1.5 years; 47% female) were significantly younger than those with a normal NPC break point (n = 46; mean = 15.7, SD = 1.7 years; 46% female). The receded NPC break point group had a significantly greater proportion of patients reporting headaches (86% vs. 61%), as well as significantly greater cognitive (mean = 13.4, SD = 8.7 vs. mean = 8.8, SD = 8.6), somatic (mean = 10.0, SD = 5.9 vs. mean = 6.9, SD = 6.6), and overall (mean = 23.7, SD = 13.6 vs. mean = 15.8, SD = 14.4) symptom severity. Our multivariable model indicated among all potential predictor variables, more severe somatic symptoms were significantly associated with a greater NPC break point (β = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.01, 0.52). The group who went onto experience persistent symptoms had a significantly greater NPC break point at initial evaluation than those without persistent symptoms (mean = 9.7, SD = 7.5 cm vs. mean = 7.0, SD = 4.0 cm). Those with a receded NPC break point at initial evaluation showed an increased symptom burden, most notable with somatic symptoms, compared with those without a receded NPC break point.

Immediate and 20-Minute Post-Exercise Performance On Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) and Near Point of Convergence (NPC)

To examine VOMS and NPC performance immediately and 20-minutes after a bout of maximal exercise. The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) and Near Point of Convergence (NPC) have received increased implementation for assessment and management of sport-related concussion. As athletes are often in a state of physical exertion during the immediate or sideline evaluation for concussion, it is imperative to understand the effects of exercise on these two tools. Seventeen, healthy college-aged individuals (20.7 ± 2.3 years) free of any modifiers for performance, completed a pre-test VOMS and NPC, followed by a graded maximal exercise treadmill test. Participants were re-assessed immediately following exercise and again 20-minutes later. Measures consisted of VOMS symptom provocation change scores per item and NPC distance (cm) averaged across 3 trials. A series of non-parametric Friedman tests and follow-up Wilcoxon signed rank tests were conducted to determine the effects between pre-test, immediate-, and 20-min post-exercise. Pre-to immediate post-exercise differences did not exist on any VOMS item, specifically, smooth pursuits (0.12 vs. 0.29, p = 0.18), saccades (horizontal: 0.18 vs. 0.29, p = 0.70; vertical: 0.24 vs. 0.41, p = 0.70), convergence (2.78 cm vs. 3.99 cm, p = 0.27), vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) (horizontal: 0.59 vs. 0.94, p = 0.31; vertical: 0.41 vs. 0.65, p = 0.27), and visual motion sensitivity (VMS) (0.47 vs. 0.94, p = 0.13). No differences were reported between pre- and immediate post-exercise on NPC distance (2.78 vs. 3.99 cm, p = 0.48). The only change from immediate to 20-min post exercise was an improvement in VMS of the VOMS (0.94 vs. 0.29, p = 0.05). No changes occurred between pre- and 20-min post-exercise. VOMS items and NPC distance remained consistent from pre-to immediate and 20-min post exercise, which may further validate their utility as sideline assessment tools. More research is needed to determine if these results extend across graded exercise testing in acute concussion and post-concussion syndrome return-to-activity management.

Utility of 1 Measurement Versus Multiple Measurements of Near Point of Convergence After Concussion.

Increased near point of convergence (NPC) distance is a common finding after concussion and is associated with physical symptoms and worsened neurocognitive performance. Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening measures NPC distance across 3 trials and uses the average measurement to inform clinical care. However, whether 3 trials are necessary, are consistent, or add clinical utility is unknown. To investigate the consistency across 3 trials of NPC and establish the classification accuracy (ie, clinical utility) of 1 or 2 trials compared with the standardized average of 3 trials. Retrospective cohort study. Sports medicine clinic and research laboratory. Consecutively enrolled patients aged 10 to 22 years with diagnosed concussions (74% sport related; n = 380). The previously reported clinical cutoff value of ≥5 cm across 3 trials was used. Pearson correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate agreement between trials and average scores. Reliable change indices (RCIs) using 95% confidence intervals were also calculated. The Pearson correlation (r = .98) and intraclass correlation (0.98) coefficients revealed excellent agreement between the first measurement and average NPC distance across 3 measurements. The RCI across all trials was 2 cm. When the first NPC measurement was ≤3 cm or ≥7 cm, agreement existed within the RCI between the first measurement and the average of 3 measurements in 99.6% of cases. When we averaged the first and second measurements, 379/380 (99.7%) participants had the same classification (ie, <5 cm = normal, ≥5 cm = abnormal) as the average NPC distance across 3 measurements. Our findings suggest limited utility of multiple or average NPC distance measurements when the initial NPC distance is outside of RCI clinical cutoffs (ie, ≤3 cm or ≥7 cm). Given the high consistency between the first measurement and average NPC distance across 3 trials, only 1 measurement of NPC distance is warranted unless the first measurement is between 3 and 7 cm.

Socioeconomic Status and Race as Social Determinants of Health to be Considered in Clinical Use of Pre-Season Vestibular and Oculomotor Tests for Concussion

Aside from racial and socioeconomic disparities in computerized neurocognitive testing and symptomology, there is a scarcity of research representing more diverse populations on other widely used tests for concussion, including vestibular and visual assessment. The aim of the study was to investigate if racial and socioeconomic differences exist on baseline vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) and King-Devick (K-D) test performance in high school student-athletes. A total of 670 participants (66.1% White, 33.9% Black) with a mean age of 15.43±1.2 years were administered a baseline VOMS, average Near Point of Convergence (NPC) distance, and K-D test. The exposure variables included race (White or Black) and socioeconomic status (SES), defined as free and reduced lunch status (FRL or No-FRL). FRL status was determined by each participant's school SES. The outcome variables consisted of baseline VOMS item symptom provocation scores, average NPC distance, and K-D baseline time. A series of Mann-Whitney U tests were performed for K-D baseline time, NPC distance, and VOMS items with FRL status or race as a between-subject factor. Two multivariable linear regressions were run to assess the association of (1) K-D baseline times using FRL, race, sex, and corrected vision as variables in the model and (2) average NPC distance using FRL, race, sex, and corrected vision as variables in the model. When adjusting for multiple comparisons, FRL athletes had slower (worse) K-D times (P<0.001) than non-FRL athletes. Black athletes had significantly lower mean NPC distance compared to White athletes at baseline (P=0.02) and FRL status athletes reported a significantly greater (worse) mean symptom provocation following the visual motion sensitivity item on the VOMS (P=0.02); however, these findings were no longer significant following adjustments for multiple comparisons. No differences were noted for any remaining VOMS items. The first model explained 3.9% of the total variance of K-D baseline times, whereas the second model was not significant. Racial and SES differences existed on average NPC distance and the K-D test at baseline. Possible explanations for group differences may be neurobiological, anatomical, and/or disparity in nature. With a higher probability of undiagnosed and uncorrected vision impairment, vestibular dysfunction, and saccadic eye tracking deficits likely to be more apparent as a consequence of poverty or health inequities, it is important that healthcare providers, especially those that diagnose and treat concussions, understand that performance on the VOMS and K-D tests at baseline may be subject to sociodemographic factors of SES and race. To provide the most culturally competent care, clinicians should consider sociodemographic variables of race and SES as social determinants of health worthy of attention on objective and subjective measures of baseline concussion assessment.

Test Order Does Not Affect Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening Item Scores in High School Athletes.

To compare VOMS item scores between a fixed and randomized administration order in a sample of nonconcussed high school athletes. Post-test only, quasi-experimental design. Local high schools in a mid-west region of the United States. Fifty nonconcussed high school athletes (M = 15.64; SD = 1.12 years) completed the VOMS in a randomized testing order (RANDOM), and 49 (M = 15.64; SD = 1.12 years) completed the VOMS in the fixed testing order (FIXED). The groups were matched on age, sex, learning disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, concussion history, and baseline concussion symptoms. The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool comprises pretest symptoms, smooth pursuit (SP), horizontal/vertical saccade (HSAC/VSAC), average near-point of convergence (NPC) distance, convergence symptoms, horizontal/vertical vestibular ocular reflex (HVOR/VVOR), and visual motion sensitivity (VMS). Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to examine differences between FIXED and RANDOM groups on VOMS items. RANDOM scores were rearranged in order of administration and combined with the FIXED group scores, and a Freidman test was performed for repeated measures. There were no significant differences between FIXED and RANDOM groups on VOMS pretest symptoms (U = 1171, P = 0.57), SP (U = 1122.5, P = 0.35), HSAC (U = 1128.5, P = 0.44), VSAC (U = 1055.5, P = 0.16), convergence symptoms (U = 1129.0, P = 0.41), average NPC distance (U = 979.0, P = 0.06), HVOR (U = 1085.0, P = 0.25), VVOR (U = 1126.0, P = 0.41), and VMS scores (U = 1101.0, P = 0.32). When VOMS items were rearranged and the sample was combined, there were no differences for repeated measures [χ2 (6) = 9.92, P = 0.13]. There were no significant differences on VOMS items between FIXED and RANDOM groups for repeated measures. The testing order of VOMS items does not affect VOMS scores in nonconcussed high school athletes.

Effects of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disability on vestibular and ocular baseline concussion assessment in pediatric athletes

Vestibular and ocular motor assessment has gained popularity as a tool for sport-related concussion among healthcare professionals. With awareness of premorbid risk factors, such as attentional problems, it is imperative to understand their effects at baseline. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and diagnosed learning disability (LD) on vestibular and oculomotor baseline concussion assessment in pediatrics. Pediatric athletes between the ages of 8 and 14 years with ADHD/LD (n = 30) and match controls without ADHD/LD (n = 30) completed baseline concussion testing, consisting of symptom provocation on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) and oculomotor performance on near point of convergence (NPC) and King-Devick (K-D) tools. Those diagnosed with ADHD/LD performed worse on baseline saccades (p range = .02–.10), convergence (p = .04), vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) (p = .03) and visual motion sensitivity (VMS) (p = .04) of the VOMS. Base rate analyses revealed that 26% of athletes in the ADHD/LD group had ≥1 and 13.3% had ≥2 VOMS domains over clinical cutoff levels, compared to 3.3% (≥1 domain) and 0 (≥2 domains) of controls. Individuals with ADHD/LD also performed worse on K-D assessment (p = .005). However, no differences were reported on NPC distance (p = .19). These findings suggest worse baseline concussion assessment scores on vestibular/ocular motor assessment domains in pediatric athletes diagnosed with ADHD/LD. Additional research is needed on assessment outcomes to determine if special consideration to those diagnosed with ADHD/LD is warranted.

Preseason Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening in Children and Adolescents.

The primary purpose of this study was to examine vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) test performance in a sample of healthy youth ice hockey players. A particular focus was to investigate the potential effects of age and pre-existing health conditions, including concussion history, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), learning disability (LD), headaches/migraines, and depression/anxiety on preseason baseline VOMS performance, including the near point of convergence (NPC) distance. Cross-sectional cohort. Outpatient physiotherapy clinic. Three hundred eighty-seven male youth hockey players, with an average age of 11.9 years (SD = 2.2, range = 8-17), completed the VOMS and responded to self- or parent-reported demographic and medical history questionnaires during preseason baseline assessments. Age, sex, and mental and physical health history including ADHD, headaches, depression, anxiety, migraine, and LD. Vestibular/ocular motor screening. The large majority of boys scored within normal limits on the VOMS, ie, they reported no symptom provocation of more than 2 points on any VOMS subset (89%) and had a normal NPC distance, ie, <5 cm (78%). The individual VOMS subtests had low abnormality rates, and demographic and pre-existing health conditions, such as age, headache or migraine history, previous neurodevelopmental conditions, or mental health problems, were not associated with clinically meaningful symptom provocation during the VOMS. There was a low rate of abnormal findings for the individual VOMS subtests, with the exception of NPC distance, among male youth hockey players during preseason assessment.

Premorbid migraine history as a risk factor for vestibular and oculomotor baseline concussion assessment in pediatric athletes.

Migraine history has recently been identified as a risk factor for concussion and recovery. The authors performed a cross-sectional study examining baseline outcome measures on newly developed and implemented concussion assessment tools in pediatrics. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of premorbid, diagnosed migraine headaches as a risk factor on vestibular and oculomotor baseline assessment in pediatric athletes. Pediatric athletes between the ages of 8 and 14 years with a diagnosed history of migraine headache (n = 28) and matched controls without a history of diagnosed migraine headache (n = 28) were administered a baseline concussion assessment battery, consisting of the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS), near point of convergence (NPC), and the King-Devick (K-D) tests. Between-groups comparisons were performed for vestibular symptoms and provocation scores on the VOMS (smooth pursuit, saccades, convergence, vestibular/ocular reflex, visual motion sensitivity), NPC (average distance), and K-D (time). Individuals diagnosed with migraine headaches reported greater VOMS smooth pursuit scores (p = 0.02), convergence scores (p = 0.04), vestibular ocular reflex scores (p value range 0.002-0.04), and visual motion sensitivity scores (p = 0.009). Differences were also observed on K-D oculomotor performance with worse times in those diagnosed with migraine headache (p = 0.02). No differences were reported on NPC distance (p = 0.06) or headache symptom reporting (p = 0.07) prior to the VOMS assessment. Pediatric athletes diagnosed with migraine headaches reported higher baseline symptom provocation scores on the VOMS. Athletes with migraine headaches also performed worse on the K-D test, further illustrating the influence of premorbid migraine headaches as a risk factor for elevated concussion assessment outcomes at baseline. Special consideration may be warranted for post-concussion assessment in athletes with migraine headaches.

Test Performance and Test-Retest Reliability of the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening and King-Devick Test in Adolescent Athletes During a Competitive Sport Season

Background: The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) and King-Devick (K-D) test are tools designed to assess ocular or vestibular function after a sport-related concussion. Purpose: To determine the test-retest reliability and rate of false-positive results of the VOMS and K-D test in a healthy athlete sample. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Forty-five healthy high school student-athletes (mean age, 16.11 ± 1.43 years) completed self-reported demographics and medical history and were administered the VOMS and K-D test during rest on day 1 (baseline). The VOMS and K-D test were administered again once during rest (prepractice) and once within 5 minutes of removal from sport practice on day 2 (removal). The Borg rating of perceived exertion scale was administered at removal. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to determine test-retest reliability on the K-D test and the average near point of convergence (NPC) distance on the VOMS. Level of agreement was used to examine VOMS symptom provocation over the 3 administration times. Multivariate base rates were used to determine the rate of false-positive results when simultaneously considering multiple clinical cutoffs. Results: Test-retest reliability of total time on the K-D test (0.91 [95% CI, 0.86-0.95]) and NPC distance (0.91 [95% CI, 0.85-0.95]) was high across the 3 administration times. Level of agreement ranged from 48.9% to 88.9% across all 3 times for the VOMS items. Using established clinical cutoffs, false-positive results occurred in 2% of the sample using the VOMS at removal and 36% using the K-D test. Conclusion: The VOMS displayed a false-positive rate of 2% in this high school student-athlete cohort. The K-D test’s false-positive rate was 36% while maintaining a high level of test-retest reliability (0.91). Results from this study support future investigation of VOMS administration in an acutely injured high school athletic sample. Going forward, the VOMS may be more stable than other neurological and symptom report screening measures and less vulnerable to false-positive results than the K-D test.

Effect of Repetitive Sub-concussive Head Impacts on Ocular Near Point of Convergence.

This study intended to examine effects of repetitive sub-concussive head impacts on ocular near point of convergence (NPC). 20 healthy young adult soccer players were assigned to either a heading or control group. Heading subjects completed 10 headers of soccer balls projected at a speed of 11.2 m/s. Control subjects did not perform heading. Linear head acceleration was measured with a triaxial accelerometer. The NPC assessment was performed at pre-, 0 h post-, and 24 h post-heading. During the NPC assessment participants were seated and a visual target was moved towards the eyes at 1cm/sec. The participant signaled when he/she experienced diplopia or deviation of the eye was observed, and the distance was recorded. The assessment was repeated twice and average NPC scores were used for further analysis. Soccer heading induced mean group head accelerations of 14.49±5.4 g. Mild head impacts led to an increased NPC distance, which was supported by a significant Group x Time interaction. In the heading group, 0 h post- and 24 h post-heading NPC scores were significantly receded compared to baseline. Conversely, NPC scores for the control group showed no difference over time. Our findings indicate that mild frontal head impacts affekt NPC for a minimum of 24 h-post heading, suggesting that oculomotor processes are disrupted, at least transiently, by repetitive mild head impact.