Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening Assessment Outcomes After Sport-Related Concussion in High School and Collegiate Athletes.

Abstract

Vestibular and ocular motor assessment is an emerging clinical assessment for patients with sport-related concussion (SRC). The increased use of these assessments by clinicians calls for the examination of outcomes that may affect clinical practice. To compare vestibular and ocular motor impairments in high school and collegiate athletes within 72 hours of SRC and examine the distribution of impairments in these populations based on pre-established clinical cutoff scores. Cross-sectional study. High school and collegiate athletics. Data were collected from 110 athletes (high school: n = 47, age = 15.40 ± 1.35 years; college: n = 63, age = 19.46 ± 1.28 years) within 72 hours of sustaining an SRC. Total and change scores were calculated for the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool, along with average near point of convergence (NPC) distance. Separate Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare group differences, and χ2 analyses were used to examine the proportion of athletes with scores greater than clinical cutoff scores for all VOMS outputs. The α level was set a priori at .05. No differences were found between high school and collegiate athletes for VOMS total and change scores and NPC distance. A larger proportion of the sample had scores greater than the cutoff for all total scores (P < .001) and change scores in horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex (59.01%; P < .001), vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex (60.91%; P < .001), and visual motion sensitivity (60.91%; P < .001). However, a larger proportion demonstrated smooth pursuit change scores (85.45%; P < .001) and NPC distances (73.64%; P = .01) that were less than the cutoff scores. During the acute phase of SRC, high school and collegiate athletes presented with similar vestibular and ocular motor impairments as measured using the VOMS, but vestibular tasks appeared to cause greater symptom provocation. Lastly, VOMS change scores may offer more clinical utility compared with total scores in assessing specific impairments after SRC.