Abstract In the pursuit of providing tropical cyclone (TC) forecasts beyond the conventional time scales covered by weather forecasting in the Philippines, this study has examined the multiweek (i.e., from week 1 to week 4) TC forecast skill in the country. TC forecasts derived from three ensemble models, namely, the NCEP Climate Forecast System version 2 (CFSv2), the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Ensemble Prediction System (ECMWF), and the NCEP Global Ensemble Forecast System version 12 (GEFSv12) from 6 October 2020 to 31 October 2021 were verified. Results revealed that the ECMWF model is consistently the most skillful in multiweek TC prediction over the domain bounded by 110°–155°E and 0°–27°N in the western North Pacific. The ECMWF obtained hit rates ranging from 0.25 to 0.31, low false alarm rates of 0–0.33, and the highest equitable threat scores among the models. In contrast to this, the GEFSv12 and CFSv2 models had varying skills, with the former performing better in the first two weeks and the latter in longer lead times. It is further revealed that the three models generally underestimate the observed number of storms, storm days, and accumulated cyclone energy. Moreover, the study shows that the forecast TC tracks have a significant (p < 0.05) positional bias toward the right of observed tracks beyond week 1, and that they tend to propagate slower than observations especially in week 1 and week 2. These findings contribute to better understanding the strengths and limitations of these ensemble models useful for eventual provision of multiweek TC forecasts in the Philippines.
Read full abstract