834 Reviews methods of the most recognized authors of thenaturalistic genre-Frank Norris, Jack London, Stephen Crane, and Theodore Dreiser-incorporate, forLink, both roman tic and naturalistic elements.With respect toDreiser, claims Link, 'we discover that works such as Sister Carrie and The Financier implement a romantic symbolism that seeks to embody and reveal the abstract, hidden forces innature in a way more reminiscent of the romantics than the realists' (p. 62). InChapter 3Link stresses the importance of recognizing common ground between utopian fictionand naturalistic texts.He offers,forexample, a revision of the relation ship between historical context and literary text as itconcerns thisgenre, dialogizing accounts of the influence of evolutionary theory in redefining naturalism. For Link, both the darkerMalthusian current and the utopian evolutionary theory of Spencer contribute to a broader conception of naturalism. Reading theworks ofUpton Sin clair, among others, against thispolyvalent determinism allows us to see thatSinclair 'moved through both positive and negative naturalistic orientations' (p. 74). Chapter 4 addresses the assumption that critics fault naturalistic narratives for refusing touphold a strict determinism, forpermitting characters to have freewill. Challenging this assessment, Link argues thatNorris, Crane, and London created narratives that 'dialogically interacted with deterministic ideologies' (p. 104). The use ofWilliam James's notion of hard and softdeterminism enables Link to demon strate compellingly thecomplex positioning ofFleming's determinism inCrane's The Red Badge ofCourage, showing thathe 'oscillates between deterministic and indeter ministic interpretations of nature and experience' (p. 13 I).While Link's study begins slowly,he creatively and successfully applies Bakhtinian theory to a genre and school of criticism to transform it into offering a variety ofmethodological approaches that permit it to engage post-structuralism and new historicism. UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR, ONTARIO SEAN PALMER Identifying the Remains: George Eliot's Death in theLondon Religious Press. By K. K. COLLINS. Victoria, BC: ELS Editions. 2006. II9 pp. $i8. ISBN 978-o 920604-94-6. This compact but well-researched study of the contemporary responses toGeorge Eliot's death offers a fascinating snapshot ofVictorian attitudes both to religion and to literature.K. K. Collins sets out to challenge the standard account of the reception of Eliot's work inwhich the central problem is seen to be the disparity between the 'imagined' or implied author, a gentle and wise upholder ofChristian morality, and the 'real' author, the radical propounder through essays and translations ofwhat one con temporary critic called 'thegodless humanitarianism ofStrauss and Feuerbach' (p. 2). Part of the solution to thisproblem, as Collins demonstrates, was the continuation long after the unveiling of her pseudonym in i859 of 'a persistent uncertainty over who shewas and what she believed' (p. 4). As late as I875 theninth edition ofMen of theTime, a trusted authority towhom many journalists turned for information,was reporting her as the daughter of a poor clergyman adopted early in lifeby awealthy one. Lacking reliable information about her lifeand beliefs, partly as a result of her own reluctance to adopt a public persona in any other form than through her works, theobituaries attempted to supply herwith at least some kind of religious identity to which their readers could attachmeaning. Collins traces a number of false legends that arose (rather in themanner Strauss had supposed of theGospels) from thediscovery of a copy of The Imitation ofChrist by her bedside along with another rumour about the supposed discovery of an unpub lished study of varying ideas of a future life.He reports at some length the coverage MLR, I03.3, 2008 835 of Eliot's surprisingly conventional funeral service. The fact that passages from the Book of Common Prayer were employed rather than the liturgy of theReligion of Humanity (towhich she had herself contributed her 'hymn'on 'The Choir Invisible') was again taken by the religious press as a sign of returning sympathy towards Chris tianity. Almost all denominations, in fact,apart from theRoman Catholics, seem to have claimed her as (secretly or in some significant respects) one of theirown. One significant omission fromCollins's account isanymention of the controversy over thepossibility ofher funeral takingplace in Westminster Abbey. The thenDean, Arthur Stanley, told JohnCross thathe would offerno insurmountable objections if therewere sufficientdemand. The opposition ironically came rather fromagnostics such as...