Seventy-two crossbred pigs with an initial bodyweight (BW) of 24.6 kg were assigned to 24 groups of three pigs to determine whether pigs have the ability to select a lysine intake and/or a protein intake to meet their requirements and to determine the effects of supplementation of a combination of lysine (Lys), methionine (Met), and threonine (Thr) on diet selection when pigs were given a choice of a pair of isoenergetic diets from 25 to 70 kg BW. Dietary treatments consisted of control, C, (conventional two phase feeding 16-14% crude protein), and three different choice feeding regimens: 1) protein choice, PC, (18 vs. 10% crude protein CP), 2) lysine choice, LC, (choice between a Lys-supplemented and -unsupplemented diet 0.90 vs. 0.53% lysine with 14% CP diets), 3) amino acid choice, AC, (choice between a diet supplemented with a combination of Lys, Met, and Thr on an ideal protein basis) and unsupplemented diet Lys (0.90 vs. 0.53%), Met (0.50 vs. 0.45%), and Thr (0.59 vs. 0.40%) with 14% CP diets). The diets based on ideal protein were formulated by supplementing synthetic Lys, Met, and Thr to meet a ratio relative to lysine of 65% for Thr, 55% for Met + cystine, and 18% for tryptophan. The two growth phases for the C treatment were 25 to 50, and 50 to 70 kg BW. All diets contained the same energy level (13.7 MJ DE kg −1). At any weight interval and the overall period, daily feed intake was not affected ( P > 0.05) by different feeding regimens and pigs in C and PC grew faster ( P < 0.05) and had superior ( P < 0.05) feed:gain ratio than LC or AC pigs. Supplementation of Lys or a combination of Lys, Met, and Thr did not improve pig performance when choice-fed with the unsupplemented diets. Protein choice pigs showed an extremely strong preference for the high protein diet and consumed 89.8% of the high protein diet and 10.2% of the low protein diet for the overall period. Supplementation of Lys alone or a combination with Met, and Thr did not increase feed consumption. Selection of the Lys supplemented diet and the Lys, Met, and Thr supplemented diet accounted for 35.7 and 31.8% of total feed intake for the overall period. During the overall period, dietary protein intake increased ( P < 0.05) in PC pigs compared with control pigs and there was no significant difference in dietary lysine intake between C and LC pigs and C and AC pigs, respectively. Protein choice and LC pigs required ( P > 0.05) a similar amount of dietary protein and lysine per unit gain of BW to that of control pigs. These results suggest that pigs are unable to control their protein and lysine intake to meet their requirement for growth when given a choice of two isoenergetic diets differing in protein and lysine content. Supplementation of Lys alone, or in combination with Met, and Thr did not affect the pattern of diet selection.
Read full abstract