Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure Research Articles

Influence of rupture velocity on risk assessment of concrete moment frames: Supershear vs. subshear ruptures

The possibility of ground motions propagating at speeds greater than the Rayleigh wave speed was accepted not long ago, and thus studies on them are limited. These supershear motions are believed to damage specific kinds of infrastructure, and thus studying the risk associated is important. As a part of this investigation, we use state-of-the-art tools from the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure to estimate normalized economic losses and injuries, by considering one particular building type and occupancy category listed in HAZUS-MH. Faults of similar dimensions are shown to replicate subshear and supershear earthquake instances with four groups of station points parallel to the fault and four more perpendicular to the fault. Both fault parallel and fault normal components of ground motion are stimulated. The economic loss % and injury is standardized in metrics of repair cost and population respectively and is estimated along with the associated uncertainty for 3, 6 and 9-story commercial concrete moment frame structures. Inclusion of complex phenomena such as supershear earthquake events in evaluating economic losses and risk will contribute to the United Nation Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) vision of disaster-resilient development goals.

Emergency management short term response to extreme heat in the 25 most populated U.S. cities

BackgroundExtreme heat events are a leading weather-related killer in the United States and are predicted to increase in frequency, duration, and intensity. Emergency managers lead short-term response to heat events as well as other natural and man-made hazards with discretion to develop criteria to activate heat responses, such as opening cooling centers and increasing surveillance activities. We aim to describe and summarize emergency management plans for short-term response to extreme heat events across the U.S. MethodsInformation on hazard mitigation plans (HMP) and heat response plans (HRP) in the 25 most populated cities in the US were collected from the National Science Foundation's Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure DesignSafe Data Depot; interviews with emergency managers; and Freedom of Information Act requests. Obtained responses and policy documents were analyzed to answer the following questions developed in consultation with the National Weather Service (NWS), Weather Program Office: 1. How many locations have developed an HRP? 2. What are the emergency management heat response activation thresholds and metrics for emergency response? 3. Do thresholds change with cascading hazards? 4. Are heat vulnerability indexes (HVI) and/or social vulnerability indexes (SVI) included, and 5. Are health outcomes considered in the development of thresholds? Results1. There is no statistical difference in the prevalence of HRPs across geographic regions in the U.S. 2. Initial response thresholds vary greatly across locations from an ambient temperature of 80–85F (26–29 C) to a Heat Index of 108F (42 C). Eighty-eight (22 of 25) percent of locations are using the NWS Heat Index and twelve percent (3 of 25) are using the experimental HeatRisk Product. 3. Sixty-Eight (17 of 25) percent of cities consider cascading hazards, such as a power grid outage, in their HMP or HRP. None of the cities, however, lower response thresholds, as explicitly written in the plans, during these events. 4. Forty percent (10 of 25) of municipalities have an HVI or SVI included or addressed in their plans, & 5. Three of the cities (New York, Phoenix, & Boston) have adapted response thresholds based on local epidemiological studies DiscussionThere is little consistency in the advisory, warning, and watch criteria thresholds across cities which may be a source of confusion to the public. If such criteria are to be tailored to each geographic location, local epidemiological studies and vulnerabilities should help inform the criteria.

Editorial: Technology transfer from the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI)

Editorial: Technology transfer from the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI)

Advancing parcel-level hurricane regional loss assessments using open data and the regional resilience determination tool

Hurricanes are a major driver of losses in the United States and thus are the focus of risk assessment capacity building efforts in the public and private sectors, as well as in the scholarly community. Capabilities for loss modeling have been particularly advanced through the development of open-source scientific workflows that conduct site-specific, building-specific, and even component-level loss assessments across entire regions. Notable among these is the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure's Computational Modeling and Simulation Center's (NHERI SimCenter) Regional Resilience Determination (R2D) tool. However, the modular architecture of R2D's computational scaffolding has only been described and illustrated through testbed applications thus far. This study presents the first replication and extension of the R2D tool to conduct parcel-level and component-level hurricane performance assessments outside of the SimCenter's testbed locations. The study first details how building inventories that capture time-evolving building characteristics and regional construction practices can be generated using updated heuristic rulesets that guide the integration of tax assessor data with other open data sources. These rulesets and supporting data are then utilized to generate building inventory information for a set of single family homes located in Florida's Bay County, the landfall site of Hurricane Michael in 2018. HAZUS-compatible, parcel-level damage and loss assessments are then conducted, considering Hurricane Michael's peak gust wind speeds. Finally, a set of custom fragilities, empirically-derived from multiple regional post-disaster datasets, are incorporated into R2D to conduct the first component-level damage assessment of buildings under hurricanes using the SimCenter's regional loss modeling workflows. In total, this represents an important first step in operationalizing replicable regional risk assessments down to the parcel level to provide more granular risk information to key stakeholders.

CONVERGE Training Modules: A free online educational tool for hazards and disaster researchers and practitioners

The National Science Foundation-supported CONVERGE facility was established in 2018 as the first social science-led component of the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI). Headquartered at the Natural Hazards Center at the University of Colorado Boulder, CONVERGE identifies, trains, connects, and funds researchers across disciplines in the hazards and disaster field. This article provides an overview of one of our most widely used tools, the CONVERGE Training Modules. These free, interactive, online trainings are designed for students, early career professionals, and others who are new to hazards and disaster research and practice. Since July 2019, our team has released 10 modules that cover a range of foundational topics in hazards and disaster research, including Institutional Review Board procedures, conducting emotionally challenging research, cultural competence, collecting and sharing perishable data, social vulnerability, and disaster mental health. In addition, CONVERGE offers advanced trainings in specialized topics such as broader ethical considerations for hazards and disaster researchers, reciprocity, gender-based violence in fieldwork, and public health implications of hazards and disaster research. Between July 2019 and November 2022, 6,311 unique users registered for the modules, and these users logged 7,222 module completions. Of the module completions to date, the largest percentage of users completed only one (46.0%) of the available trainings, although a small group of “superusers”—whom we surveyed for this article—have completed all or almost all of the available modules. When asked why they planned to complete the modules at the time of registration, most users indicated that it was to fulfill a classroom or other educational requirement (51.2%), for personal interest/to learn more (9.0%), or to prepare for or to support research (7.1%) or practice-oriented activities (5.8%). In addition to providing more information regarding module users, this article details the development of the technology and discusses the impact and success of this tool for transferring knowledge and skills to the hazards and disaster research and practice community. We conclude with a discussion of future directions for this research-based educational intervention.

Community Perspectives on Simulation and Data Needs for the Study of Natural Hazard Impacts and Recovery

With the aim of fostering the development of robust tools to simulate the impact of natural hazards on structures, lifelines, and communities, the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure Computational Modeling and Simulation Center gathered 60 researchers, developers, and practitioners working in natural hazards engineering (NHE) for a workshop to prioritize research questions and identify community needs for data and computational simulation capabilities. Participants used their wide-ranging expertise in earthquake, coastal, and wind hazards from engineering, planning, data sciences, and social sciences perspectives to identify five major thrusts of recommended future work, including detailed suggestions for each: (1) development of housing and household recovery models; (2) integration of existing models into flexible computational workflows; (3) investment in the collection of high-value open data; (4) commitment to sharing and utilizing high-value data; and (5) development of versatile, multidisciplinary testbed studies. Participant responses and workshop data were analyzed with the help of an ontology that the authors designed to support data classification in a broad range of NHE applications. The paper also includes observations and suggestions for planning and conducting interactive workshops of this type.

Characterization and real‐time hybrid simulation testing of rolling pendulum isolation bearings with different surface treatments

AbstractDamage caused by earthquakes to buildings and their contents (e.g., sensitive equipment) can impact life safety and disrupt business operations following an event. Floor isolation systems (FISs) are a promising retrofit strategy for protecting vital building contents. In this study, real‐time hybrid simulation (RTHS) is utilized to experimentally incorporate multi‐scale (building–FIS–equipment) interactions. For this, an experimental setup representing one bearing of a rolling pendulum (RP) based FIS is studied—first through characterization tests and then through RTHS. A series of tests was conducted at the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI) Experimental Facility at Lehigh University. Multiple excitations were used to study the experimental setup under uni‐axial loading. Details of the experimental testbed and test protocols for the characterization and RTHS tests are presented, along with results from these tests, which focused on the effect of different rolling surface treatments for supplemental damping, the FIS–equipment and building–FIS interactions, and rigorous evaluation of different RP isolation bearing designs through RTHS.

Editorial: Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI): Mitigating the Impact of Natural Hazards on Civil Infrastructure and Communities

Editorial: Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI): Mitigating the Impact of Natural Hazards on Civil Infrastructure and Communities

StEER: A Community-Centered Approach to Assessing the Performance of the Built Environment after Natural Hazard Events

Since its founding in 2018, the Structural Extreme Events Reconnaissance (StEER) Network has worked to deepen the capacity of the Natural Hazards Engineering (NHE) community for coordinated and standardized assessments of the performance of the built environment following natural hazard events. This paper positions StEER within the field of engineering reconnaissance and the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI), outlining its organizational model for coordinated community-led responses to wind, seismic, and coastal hazard events. The paper’s examination of StEER’s event response workflow, engaging a range of hardware and delivering a suite of products, demonstrates StEER’s contributions in the areas of: workflow and data standardization, data reliability to enable field-observation-driven research & development, efficiency in data collection and dissemination to speed knowledge sharing, near-real- time open data access for enhanced coordination and transparency, and flexibility in collaboration modes to reduce the “overhead” associated with reconnaissance and foster broad NHE community engagement in event responses as part of field and virtual assessment structural teams (FAST/VAST). StEER’s creation of efficient systems to deliver well-documented, reliable data suitable for diverse re-uses as well as rapidly disseminated synopses of the impact of natural hazard events on the built environment provide a distinctive complement to existing post-event reconnaissance initiatives. The implementation of these policies, protocols and workflows is then demonstrated with case studies from five events illustrating StEER’s different field response strategies: the Nashville, Tennessee Tornadoes (2020) – a Hazard Gradient Survey; the Palu Earthquake and Tsunami in Indonesia (2018) – a Representative Performance Study; the Puerto Rico Earthquakes (2019/2020) – using Targeted Case Studies; Hurricane Laura (2020) – leveraging Rapid Surveys to enable virtual assessments; and Hurricane Dorian (2019) in the Bahamas – a Phased Multi-Hazard Investigation. The use of these strategies has enabled StEER to respond to 36 natural hazard events, involving over 150 different individuals to produce 45 published reports/briefings, over 5000 publicly available app-based structural assessments, and over 1600 km (1000 mi) of street-level panoramic imagery in its first 2years of operation.

System Identification of UCSD-NHERI Shake-Table Test of Two-Story Structure with Cross-Laminated Timber Rocking Walls

AbstractA full-scale 2-story mass timber building was tested on the University of California San Diego Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (UCSD-NHERI) uniaxial shake table during t...

NHERI@UC San Diego 6-DOF Large High-Performance Outdoor Shake Table Facility

Since its commissioning in 2004, the UC San Diego Large High-Performance Outdoor Shake Table (LHPOST) has enabled the seismic testing of large structural, geostructural and soil-foundation-structural systems, with its ability to accurately reproduce far- and near-field ground motions. Thirty-four (34) landmark projects were conducted on the LHPOST as a national shared-use equipment facility part of the National Science Foundation (NSF) Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) and currently Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI) programs, and an ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2005 accredited facility. The tallest structures ever tested on a shake table were conducted on the LHPOST, free from height restrictions. Experiments using the LHPOST generate essential knowledge that has greatly advanced seismic design practice and response predictive capabilities for structural, geostructural, and non-structural systems, leading to improved earthquake safety in the community overall. Indeed, the ability to test full-size structures has made it possible to physically validate the seismic performance of various systems that previously could only be studied at reduced scale or with computer models. However, the LHPOST's limitation of 1-DOF (uni-directional) input motion prevented the investigation of important aspects of the seismic response of 3-D structural systems. The LHPOST was originally conceived as a six degrees-of-freedom (6-DOF) shake table but built as a single degree-of-freedom (1-DOF) system due to budget limitations. The LHPOST is currently being upgraded to 6-DOF capabilities. The 6-DOF upgraded LHPOST (LHPOST6) will create a unique, large-scale, high-performance, experimental research facility that will enable research for the advancement of the science, technology, and practice in earthquake engineering. Testing of infrastructure at large scale under realistic multi-DOF seismic excitation is essential to fully understand the seismic response behavior of civil infrastructure systems. The upgraded 6-DOF capabilities will enable the development, calibration, and validation of predictive high-fidelity mathematical/computational models, and verifying effective methods for earthquake disaster mitigation and prevention. Research conducted using the LHPOST6 will improve design codes and construction standards and develop accurate decision-making tools necessary to build and maintain sustainable and disaster-resilient communities. Moreover, it will support the advancement of new and innovative materials, manufacturing methods, detailing, earthquake protective systems, seismic retrofit methods, and construction methods. This paper will provide a brief overview of the 1-DOF LHPOST and the impact of some past landmark projects. It will also describe the upgrade to 6-DOF and the new seismic research and testing that the LHPOST6 facility will enable.

A Cloud-Enabled Application Framework for Simulating Regional-Scale Impacts of Natural Hazards on the Built Environment

With the goal to facilitate evaluation and mitigation of the risks from natural hazards, the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure’s Computational Modeling, and Simulation Center (NHERI SimCenter) is developing computational workflows for regional hazard simulations. These simulations enable research to combine detailed assessments of individual facilities with comprehensive regional-scale simulations of natural hazard effects. By integration of multi-fidelity and multi-resolution models to assess natural hazard impacts on buildings, infrastructure systems and other constructed facilities, the approach enables the engineering analysis of public policies and socio-economic impacts. Effective development of platforms for high-resolution regional simulations requires modular workflows that can integrate state-of-the-art models with information technologies and high-performance computing resources. In this paper, the modular architecture of the computational workflow models is described and illustrated through testbed applications to evaluate regional building damage under an earthquake and a hurricane scenario. Developed and disseminated as open-source software on the NHERI DesignSafe Cyberinfrastructure, the computational models and workflows are enabling multi-disciplinary collaboration on research to mitigate the effects of natural hazard disasters.

Natural Hazards Reconnaissance With the NHERI RAPID Facility

In 2016 NSF funded an interdisciplinary multi-institutions team to develop and operate the Natural Hazards Reconnaissance Facility (known as the “RAPID”) as part of the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI) program. To enable support of state of the art natural hazard reconnaissance research, the RAPID facility’s instrumentation portfolio and operational plan were developed over the following two years. Input was gathered from the natural hazards engineering community, the facility’s leadership, the National Science Foundation, and an interdisciplinary, external steering committee of scientists with decades of reconnaissance-based research experience in natural hazards and disasters. Beginning operations in September 2018, the RAPID now provides instrumentation, software, training, and support services to investigators performing field-based research before, during, and after natural hazards. Since beginning operations, RAPID has supported the data collection efforts of more than 40 missions. Applications have ranged across disciplines and hazards. They have also included data gathering in large-scale experimental facilities. These activities have produced an unprecedented amount of high-quality field data sets that are archived on the DesignSafe cyberinfrastructure platform. This paper describes the development of the RAPID facility, the equipment portfolio, and services provided by RAPID, including a custom-built reconnaissance software platform called RApp, and the opportunities RAPID provides for user training. Additionally, overviews of three example deployments of the RAPID equipment and data collection services are described; descriptions include the field data collection processes, the resulting high-quality data sets, and the impact of the data and resulting research on natural hazard resilience.

NHERI@UTexas Experimental Facility With Large-Scale Mobile Shakers for Field Studies

The Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI) experimental facility at the University of Texas (NHERI@UTexas) is funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). NHERI@UTexas contributes unique, large-scale, hydraulically-controllable mobile shakers and associated instrumentation to study and develop novel, in-situ testing methods that can be used to evaluate the needs of existing infrastructure as well as optimize the design of future infrastructure. The ability to test existing infrastructure under actual field conditions bridges the gap in the transformative tools needed for the next frontier of resilient and sustainable natural-hazards research. Further, these unique facilities are available to any NSF-funded research. The field shakers and support equipment are described. Examples of on-going and future projects in three key areas of investigation that NHERI@UTexas is targeting are presented. These examples includes: (1) performing more accurate 2D/3D subsurface geotechnical imaging up larger depths, (2) characterizing liquefaction resistance and nonlinear dynamic behavior in situ soils, and (3) developing in-situ methods nondestructive soil-foundation-structure interaction (SFSI) studies.

Building Resilient Coastal Communities: The NHERI Experimental Facility for Surge, Wave, and Tsunami Hazards

Through the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure program (NHERI) established by the National Science Foundation in the United States, a suite of experimental facilities has been made available to the research community to advance the resilience of civil infrastructure and communities to coastal storm and earthquake hazards. An experimental facility called the NHERI Experimental Facility hosted at the O.H. Hinsdale Wave Research Laboratory at Oregon State University (HWRL EF) was created through this program that serves as a state-of-the-art engineering research, education, and outreach center related to tsunamis caused by earthquakes and coastal waves and surge caused by windstorms. HWRL EF includes two specialized large-scale resources for physical model testing of coastal systems: a large wave flume (LWF) and a directional wave basin (DWB). These facilities are available to the research community to address grand challenges relating to tsunami and coastal windstorm surge and wave hazards impacting the built and natural environments. This paper describes the capabilities of the HWRL EF and presents 10 example projects conducted under NHERI since 2016. The research projects highlight the broad scientific interest and potential application of physical model testing in multi-hazard mitigation and resilience in coastal communities.

Automation and New Capabilities in the University of Florida NHERI Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel

The Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI) experimental facility at the University of Florida provides a diverse suite of experimental resources to support wind hazard research. The 40-m long Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel (BLWT) simulates boundary layer flows to characterize wind loading on rigid structural models and assess the response of aeroelastic structures. The use of experimental automation tools provides researchers unparalleled flexibility in their test configurations while supporting high throughput testing and data collection. The Terraformer, an array of 1116 roughness elements, can be rapidly reconfigured to generate terrain conditions in less than 90 seconds, the test section turntable can move automatically through a range of wind approach angles, and the instrumentation gantry can traverse preset paths to collect wind field measurements anywhere in the tunnel cross-section. These test automation tools, along with mechatronic structural models and real-time data transfer and processing, provide new opportunities in experimental wind tunnel testing. Recent cyber-physical wind tunnel testing projects highlight the benefits of these experimental automation tools. This paper will also discuss the most recent addition to the BLWT, the Flow Field Modulator (FFM). It consists of a 2D array of 319 individually controlled ducted fans driven by electronic speed controllers. The FFM expands the BLWT capabilities by supporting the simulation of non-monotonic profiles and nonstationary events such as gust fronts and downbursts, where mean velocity and turbulence distributions change over short spatial scales. The ability to simulate these flow conditions in a wind tunnel enables the investigation of a wide range of damaging conditions and the solutions for mitigating their impact on structures.

NHERI Lehigh Experimental Facility With Large-Scale Multi-Directional Hybrid Simulation Testing Capabilities

The NHERI Lehigh Experimental Facility, as part of the NSF funded Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI) site, was established in 2016 as an open-access facility. This facility enables researchers to conduct state-of-art research on natural hazard mitigation in civil infrastructure systems, including high performance numerical and physical testing to improve the resilience and sustainability of the civil infrastructure against natural hazards. The facility has the unique ability to conduct real-time multi-directional hybrid simulation (RTHS) on large-scale structural systems using 3D nonlinear numerical models combined with large-scale physical models of structural and non-structural components. The Lehigh Experimental Facility processes testbeds that include a testbed for testing lateral load resisting system characterization testbed, a non-structural component multi-directional dynamic loading simulator, full-scale and reduced-scale damper testbeds, a tsunami and storm surge debris impact force testbed, and a soil-foundation structure interaction testbed. This paper describes the infrastructure and capabilities of the NHERI Lehigh Experimental Facility. Developments by the facility in advancing large-scale RTHS are given. Examples of research projects performed by users of the facility are then provided, including large-scale RTHS of steel frame buildings with magneto-rheological (MR) dampers and nonlinear viscous dampers subject to strong earthquake ground motions; 3D multi-hazard large-scale RTHS of tall steel buildings subject to multi-directional wind and earthquake ground motions; characterization of a novel semi-active friction device based on band brake technology; and testing of cross-laminated timber self-centering coupled wall-floor diaphragm-gravity systems involving multi-directional loading.

The Network Coordination Office of NHERI (Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure)

NHERI, or the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure, is supported by the United States National Science Foundation (NSF) as a distributed, multi-user national facility that provides the natural hazards research community with access to a powerful research infrastructure. NHERI is comprised of separate research infrastructure awards for a Network Coordination Office (NCO), Cyberinfrastructure, a Computational Modeling and Simulation Center, eight Experimental Facilities, and CONVERGE (an initiative to advance social sciences and interdisciplinary research). Awards made for NHERI contribute to NSF's role in the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program and the National Windstorm Impact Reduction Program of the United States. The mission of NHERI is to provide the earthquake, wind, coastal engineering, and social sciences communities with access to research infrastructure, education, and community outreach activities focused on improving the resilience and sustainability of the civil infrastructure against earthquakes, windstorms, and associated natural events such as tsunami and coastal storm surge. In this paper, the role and key NHERI activities are described for the NCO, which is led by Purdue University, along with partner institutions—the University of Texas at San Antonio, North Carolina State University, Texas Tech University, the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, and the University of Hawaii at Manoa. The NHERI NCO serves as a focal point and leader of a multi-hazards research community, and maintains a community-based NHERI science plan. It manages scheduling of our partner NHERI Experimental Facilities and coordinates all components to ensure effective and fair governance, efficient testing and user support within a safe environment. Another important role of the NCO is to lead NHERI-wide educational and outreach activities. The NCO works to develop strategic national and international partnerships and to coordinate NHERI activities with other awardee components to form a cohesive and fully-integrated global natural hazards engineering research infrastructure that fosters collaboration in new ways.

NHERI Centrifuge Facility: Large-Scale Centrifuge Modeling in Geotechnical Research

Author(s): Boulanger, RW; Wilson, DW; Kutter, BL; DeJong, JT; Bronner, CE | Abstract: The 9-m and 1-m radius geotechnical centrifuges at the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI) facility at the University of California at Davis provide the national research community with open access to unique and versatile modeling capabilities for advancing methods to predict and improve the performance of soil and soil-structure systems affected by earthquake, wave, wind, and storm surge loadings. Large-scale centrifuge models are particularly effective for the building of basic science knowledge, the validation of advanced computational models from the component to the holistic system level, and the validation of innovative soil remediation strategies. The capabilities and unique role of large-scale centrifuge modeling are illustrated using three example research projects from the shared-use NHERI facility. Education impacts stemming from operations activities and coordination of activities by the center’s user base are discussed. Future directions and opportunities for research using the NHERI facilities are discussed.

Measuring User Satisfaction for the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure Consortium

The User Forum is a Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI)-wide group focused on providing the NHERI Council with independent advice on community user satisfaction, priorities, and needs relating to the use and capabilities of NHERI. The User Forum has representation across NHERI activities, including representatives working directly with the Network Coordination Office (NCO), Education and Community Outreach (ECO), Facilities Scheduling, and Technology Transfer efforts. The User forum also provides feedback on the NHERI Science Plan. As the community voice within the governance of NHERI, the User Forum is composed of members nominated and elected by the NHERI community for a specified term of one to two years. User Forum membership spans academia and industry, the full breadth of civil engineering and social science disciplines, and widespread hazard expertise including earthquakes, windstorms, and water events. One of the primary responsibilities of the User Forum is to conduct an annual community user satisfaction survey for NHERI users, and publish a subsequent Annual Community Report. Measuring user satisfaction and providing this feedback to the NHERI Council is critical to supporting the long-term sustainability of NHERI and its mission as a multidisciplinary and multi-hazard network. In this paper, the role and key activities of the User Forum are described, including User Forum member election procedures, User Forum member representation and roles across NHERI activities, and the processes for measuring and reporting user satisfaction. This paper shares the user satisfaction survey distributed to NHERI users, and discusses the challenges to measuring community user satisfaction based on the definition of user. Finally, this paper discusses the evolving approaches of measuring user satisfaction using other methods, including engaging with the twelve NHERI research infrastructures.