COP-24 left us with the important legacy of a rulebook for putting the Paris Agreement into practice, particularly in terms of measuring and reporting CO2 emissions. However, countries failed to agree voluntary market mechanisms, and more importantly, the imperative of staying below the 1.5°C of the IPCC report. Globally, in 2017 renewable power contributed to 70% of net additions to power generating capacity with estimated 178 gigawatts added.1 New additions to solar capacity were greater than combined additions in coal, natural gas and nuclear power. However, CO2 energy-related emissions increased 1.4%, primarily due to global economic growth of 3.7%. The UK has successfully managed to curb CO2 emissions by 43% compared to 1990 levels, and therefore, making good progress towards the 80% reduction target by 2050.2 This is especially significant considering that during the same period the UK economy grew by over 70% (above the G7 average). So, have we solved the conundrum of decoupling economic growth and CO2 emissions? Decarbonisation of the power sector with a shift from coal to gas is largely responsible for the UK emissions reduction, with 75% reductions since 2012 coming from the power sector. It is clear, though, that further reductions require decarbonisation of other sectors, particularly heat, industry and transport. The UK Spring Statement 2019 introduced the Future Homes Standard, mandating the end of fossil-fuel heating systems in all new houses from 2025, and this has been met with disbelief in the construction sector. There is consensus that meeting the global climate ambitions of the Paris Agreement without jeopardising economic growth requires that we take a holistic approach to decarbonisation, particularly to incentivise decarbonisation of energy intensive industries.3 For example, existing 45Q tax legislation in the United States provides incentives in reducing CO2 emissions to power plants and industrial facilities and offering tax credits of $50 per tonne of CO2 stored and $35 per tonne for CO2 utilised. It is clear also that policy parity is needed across energy technologies.4 The UK has recently set up the Clean Growth Strategy aiming to grow national income, while cutting CO2 emissions.5 The UK CCUS Cost Challenge Taskforce reported that CCUS can play a critical role in reducing emissions across electricity, as well as heating, industry and transport.3 In addition, CCUS can also improve productivity and competitiveness in a future low carbon economy. It is also clear that a ‘no CCS pathway’ would result in a more costly option to achieve the required targets. For example, for the UK to decarbonise electricity without CCS, it would require low-carbon generation to be more than quadrupled between now and 2050. The deployment of CCUS in industrial clusters can help drive lower costs. These clusters are areas with a number of industrial sites (e.g. chemicals, iron/steel, food/drink, cement, refineries etc) and will benefit from sharing infrastructure as well as knowledge. Industrial decarbonisation is key to achieve the 80% reduction target as around 25% of UK emissions come from industry. The UK Industrial Strategy has set out Grand Challenges to maximise the advantages for UK industry from the global shift to clean growth. This includes establishing at least one low-carbon cluster by 2030 and a net-zero carbon industrial cluster by 2040.6 King Coal's abdication is only a partial fix for decarbonisation of the power sector. It will not solve the conundrum of decoupling sustainable economic growth and CO2 emissions. CCUS does! Prof M. Mercedes Maroto-Valer, FRSE, FIChemE, FRSC, FRSA R. Buchan Chair in Sustainable Energy Engineering Director Research Centre for Carbon Solutions (RCCS) Assistant Deputy Principal (Research & Innovation) Heriot-Watt University