Previous articleNext article No AccessAnthropologists and Native Ethnographers in Central European Villages: Comparative Notes on the Professional Personality of Two DisciplinesTamas HoferTamas Hofer Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Current Anthropology Volume 9, Number 4Oct., 1968 Sponsored by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/200902 Views: 7Total views on this site Citations: 23Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1968 Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological ResearchPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Nikola Balaš Through a peephole: Vladimír Karbusický, the secret police and the scholarly ethos in socialist Czechoslovakia, History and Anthropology 9 (Oct 2022): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2022.2060218Čarna Brković European Anthropology as a Fortuitous Accident?, Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 29, no.22 (Sep 2020): 31–48.https://doi.org/10.3167/ajec.2020.290203Marian Viorel Anăstăsoaie, László Fosztó, Iuliu Rațiu Fieldwork in Socialist Romania: The Umass Romanian Research Group, Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia 63, no.22 (Feb 2019): 7–12.https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2018-0008Steven Sampson How I Became a ‘Romania Expert’, Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia 63, no.22 (Feb 2019): 13–28.https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2018-0009Vytis Čiubrinskas, Carole Lemée Les études anthropologiques en Lituanie : défis et résilience, Ethnologie française Vol. 48, no.22 (Mar 2018): 201–208.https://doi.org/10.3917/ethn.182.0201Susan Gal Tamás Hofer (1929-2016), American Anthropologist 119, no.11 (Feb 2017): 177–180.https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12806Enika Abazi, Albert Doja From the communist point of view: Cultural hegemony and folkloric manipulation in Albanian studies under socialism, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 49, no.22 (Jun 2016): 163–178.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2016.04.002Albert Doja From the native point of view, History of the Human Sciences 28, no.44 (Oct 2015): 44–75.https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695115594099Albert Doja From the German-speaking point of view: Unholy Empire, Balkanism, and the culture circle particularism of Albanian studies, Critique of Anthropology 34, no.33 (Aug 2014): 290–326.https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X14531834Aet Annist, Maarja Kaaristo Studying Home Fields: Encounters of Ethnology and Anthropology in Estonia, Journal of Baltic Studies 44, no.22 (Jun 2013): 121–151.https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2013.775846Frank Salomon 1. « Les parents ressuscités » : John V. Murra et l’histoire de l’anthropologie, (Jan 2012): 9–35.https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionsmsh.14995Katherine Verdery, Justine Faure Les échanges universitaires, la logique de bloc et l'esprit de guerre froide, Vingtième Siècle. Revue d'histoire 109, no.11 (Jan 2011): 201.https://doi.org/10.3917/vin.109.0201Ingrid Slavec Gradišnik Ethnology in Slovenia and Serbia: Two traditions of »Jugoslav« Ethnology?, Traditiones (Apr 2010): 17–35.https://doi.org/10.3986/Traditio2010390103Vintila Mihǎilescu Quelle anthropologie pour quelle société?, Anthropologie et Sociétés 32, no.1-21-2 (Sep 2008): 217–239.https://doi.org/10.7202/018890arChris Hann Anthropology's Multiple Temporalities and its Future in East-Central Europe, Czech Sociological Review 43, no.11 (Feb 2007): 15–30.https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2007.43.1.02Barbara Henkes, Richard Johnson Silences across Disciplines: Folklore Studies, Cultural Studies, and History, Journal of Folklore Research: An International Journal of Folklore and Ethnomusicology 39, no.2-32-3 (May 2002): 125–146.https://doi.org/10.2979/JFR.2002.39.2-3.125M.D. Kennedy Eastern European Studies: Culture, (Jan 2001): 3979–3984.https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03334-9LÁSZLÓ KÜRTI Cameras and other gadgets. Reflections on fieldwork experiences in socialist and post-socialist Hungarian communities, Social Anthropology 7, no.22 (Jan 2007): 169–187.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.1999.tb00188.xE. L. Cerroni-Long Introduction: Insider or Native Anthropology?, NAPA Bulletin 16, no.11 (Jan 2008): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1525/napa.1995.16.1.1CHRIS HANN After Communism: reflections on East European anthropology and the ‘transition’, Social Anthropology 2, no.33 (Jan 2007): 229–249.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.1994.tb00279.xThomas K. Schippers Regards ethnologiques sur l'Europe, Terrain , no.1717 (Oct 1991): 146–152.https://doi.org/10.4000/terrain.3022 Diane Lewis Anthropology and Colonialism, Current Anthropology 14, no.55 (Oct 2015): 581–602.https://doi.org/10.1086/201393Moshe Shokeid (Minkovitz) Fieldwork as Predicament rather than Spectacle, European Journal of Sociology 12, no.11 (Jul 2009): 111–122.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600002228