Whether one agrees with John Keegan that war is fundamentally a cultural phenomenon or adheres to the more traditional Clausewitzian view that war is all about politics, it is clear that armed forces are raised, equipped, organized, supplied, and commanded by discrete social groups. Therefore, the way wars are fought is inherently cultural: it could hardly be otherwise. So Russell Weigley was right, there is an American way of war: we just do not know exactly what that is?yet.1 If Wayne Lee's objective is to track the cultural roots of American military history, the debate must be broader than what he proposes.2 First, it must be grounded more firmly in what might be called the mainstream intellectual debate over the nature of the American national psyche. Only then can the American conception of the purpose and conduct of war be properly assessed. Secondly, to get a handle on what is distinctly American about America's way of war, the debate must be set in a wider, international context. American military history needs to be informed by the literature, the debates, and the shared expe riences of others, including not only America's enemies, but its allies as well. Americans may not always agree with and like what foreigners say about them, but such a debate needs outside perspectives. Lee characterized John Lynn's approach to the problem of culture and war as a dialogue between the nation's discourse on war and the practices of its army. That conception is much too narrow. The dialogue needs to be between the nation's discourse on who and what Americans are?writ large?and how they fight. Despite the existence of a small regular army, the bulk of America's wars have been fought by the great mass of the Ameri can people, who carried with them all the baggage of a dynamic, boisterous, and often uncertain society. The roots, then, of a distinctly American approach to war and fight ing go well beyond the rather limited confines of the discourse on military institutions. Lee's study, therefore, needs to push into the broader debates over what it means to be American and to be an American at war. James Webb's popular but facile treatment of the subject, Born Fighting: How the Scots-Irish Shaped America, argues that there is something fundamentally combative deep in the nation's collective psyche. Academics have heard this before. A dissenting voice during the panel discussion on World War II at the 2005
Read full abstract