Purpose Flattening Filter Free beams have become widespread in current radiotherapy practice; therefore, an assessment of different dosimetric approaches is necessary. The British Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) recommendations, Topical Report 1 (2016), include a FFF spectral correction. IAEA TRS-398 has not yet included this type of correction. A comparison of IAEA TRS-398 and the British IPSM 1990 codes of practice (including recent IPEM recommendations) was carried out. Methods Three Varian Truebeam linacs were used, with 6FFF and 10FFF beams. A PTW Semiflex thimble chamber and an IBA CCU electrometer were used for PDD measurements for IPSM 1990, a PTW Roos and an IBA CCU electrometer were used for IAEA TRS-398 PDD measurements. For absolute dose measurements, a NE 2571 Farmer chamber and a PTW Unidos E electrometer were used. Absolute dose was measured following both protocols recommendations: 5cm (IPSM 1990) and 10 cm (TRS-398) deep. Polarity and recombination factors were also measured at each recommended depth. Our secondary standard chamber and electrometer were calibrated at the National Physical Laboratory (UK), and all our measurements are subsequently traceable to NPL. Ion chamber intercomparisons, using the replacement method recommended for FFF beams by IPEM Topical Report 1, were performed with our secondary standard (NE 2561) and NE 2571 at each of the recommended depth and for both beam qualities. Results NPL N D , w calibration factors were used for each beam quality for IPSM 1990; whereas for TRS-398, the recommended option of using N D , w for Co-60 along with its tabulated k q factors was utilized. TRS-398 and IPSM 1990/IPEM Topical Report 1 absolute dose measurements are within 0.5%, falling well within uncertainty estimates. Conclusions A detailed and thorough absolute dose study was carried out according to the two above mentioned codes of practice: correction factors, ion chamber intercomparisons and absolute dose measurements at recommended depths. All experimental results are accompanied by a rigorous uncertainty analysis, according to ISO GUM. Our results for 6 FFF and 10 FFF show that, within uncertainty, absorbed dose to water according to both codes of practice agree.