National Institutes Of Health Grants Research Articles

Funding for Refugee Health Research From the National Institutes of Health Between 2000 and 2020

The US has historically resettled more refugees than any other country, with over 3.5 million refugees since 1980. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the largest public funder of biomedical research and development, but its role in mitigating many health disparities refugees experience through its funded research remains unknown. To examine the NIH's research funding patterns on refugee health research over the last 2 decades. Secondary analysis of NIH-funded grants between 2000 and 2020 using a cross-sectional study design. The NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools database was used to find relevant grants. Data were analyzed from November 2021 to September 2022. NIH grants awarded by year, state, grant type, research area, funding institute, grant duration, and amount funded. Of 1.7 million NIH grants funded over the 20-year study period, only 78 addressed refugee health. Funded grants were mostly training grants (23 grants [29%]), followed by hypothesis-driven research (R01 grants; 22 grants [28%]), pilot or preliminary investigation proposals (13 grants [17%]), and other types of grants (20 grants [26%]). The most studied research domain was mental health (36 grants [46%]), followed by refugee family dynamics and women's and children's health (14 grants [18%]). A total of 26 grants (33%) were funded by the National Institute of Mental Health and 15 (19%) were funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Most grants were US-based (60 grants [76%]) and the state of Massachusetts received the greatest amount of funding ($14 825 852 [18%]). In 2020, the NIH allocated about $2.3 million to refugee health research, or less than 0.01% of its $42 billion budget that year. The number of grants funded in each time period did not always reflect changes in the number of refugees resettled in the US over the years. This cross-sectional study found that there remain significant gaps in the understanding of and interventions in the health research needs of refugees locally and along the migratory route. To close these gaps, the NIH should increase its investments in comprehensive studies assessing the physical, mental, and social well-being of this expanding population. This can be achieved by ensuring that all NIH institutes allocate budgets specifically for refugee health research and extend support for the training of refugee researchers.

Impact of vaccination and high-risk group awareness on the mpox epidemic in the United States, 2022–2023: a modelling study

The unprecedented global outbreak of mpox in 2022 posed a public health challenge. In addition to the mpox vaccine campaign in the United States (US), community organisations and public health agencies initiated educational efforts to promote sexual risk reduction. This modelling study estimated the impact of the two-dose vaccination campaign and sexual behaviour changes coincident with high-risk group awareness on the mpox epidemic in the US. We fitted a deterministic, risk-structured SEIARV model to the epidemic curve of reported mpox cases in the US between May 22, 2022 and December 22, 2022. We evaluated the putative effects of the two preventive responses in the US -- vaccination and sexual risk reduction -- at the population-level, by calculating the prevention percentages of cumulative cases compared to the counterfactual scenario without interventions. We performed sensitivity analyses with four parameters: case reporting fidelity, vaccine effectiveness, proportion of asymptomatic cases, and assortative mixing. Model fitting revealed a basic reproduction number of 3.88 and 0.39 for the high-risk and low-risk populations, respectively, with 71.8% of mpox cases estimated from the high-risk population. A two-dose vaccination campaign, solely, could prevent 21.2% (10.2%-24.1%) of cases, while behaviour changes due to high-risk group awareness alone could prevent 15.4% (14.3%-20.6%). The combination of both measures were synergistic, with the model suggesting that 64.0% (43.8%-69.0%) of US cases were averted that would have otherwise occurred. Our models suggest that the 2022-2023 mpox epidemic in the US was controlled by a combination of two-dose mpox vaccination campaign and high-risk group awareness and sexual risk reduction. Taiwan Ministry of Education grant #NTU-112L9004, Taiwan National Science and Technology Council grant #MOST-109-2314-B-002-147-MY3 and grant #NSC-112-2314-B-002-216-MY3. SHV was supported, in part, by US National Institutes of Health grant #P30MH062294.

THE ROLE OF MECHANOSENSORY NEURONS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES

Distal arthrogryposis (DA) is a collection of rare developmental disorders characterized by congenital joint contractures. Most arthrogryposis mutations are in muscle- and joint-related genes, and the anatomical defects originate cell-autonomously within the musculoskeletal tissues. However, gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in PIEZO2, a principal mechanosensor in somatosensation, cause DA subtype 5 via unknown mechanisms. We show that expression of a GOF PIEZO2 mutation in proprioceptive sensory neurons mainly innervating muscle spindles and tendons is sufficient to induce DA5-like phenotypes in mice. Overactive PIEZO2 causes anatomical defects via increased activity within the peripheral nervous system during postnatal development. Surprisingly, overactive PIEZO2 is likely to cause joint abnormalities via increased exocytosis from sensory neuron endings without involving motor circuitry. This reveals a role for somatosensory neurons: excessive mechanosensation within these neurons disrupts musculoskeletal development. We also present proof-of-concept that Botox injection or dietary treatment can counteract the effect of overactive PIEZO2 function to evade DA-like phenotypes in mice when applied during a developmental critical period. These approaches might have clinical applications. Beyond this, our findings call attention to the importance of considering sensory mechanotransduction when diagnosing and treating other musculoskeletal disorders.Acknowledgements: Our work is supported by National Institutes of Health grant (R35 NS105067, R01 DE022358, R25 SC3GM127195, R25 GM07138, R01GM133845, intramural) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Number of completed exercise sessions is associated with slower brain atrophy in MCI over 12 months in the EXERT trial

AbstractBackgroundMid‐ and late‐life exercise has been associated with lower dementia risk. The EXERT trial tested whether aerobic training (AX), compared to stretching/balance/range‐of‐motion training (SBR), could slow cognitive decline in MCI. While no difference was detected between exercise arms, EXERT participants overall showed little cognitive change over 12 months. It is possible that the amount of exercise, rather than the type, may be protective against decline. In this exploratory, post‐hoc analysis of EXERT data, we assessed whether intervention adherence, operationalized as the number of supervised exercise sessions completed, was associated with slower brain atrophy over 12 months.Method194 EXERT participants with baseline and follow‐up MRI were included in this analysis. For each participant, the number of supervised exercise sessions of at least 40 minutes in duration completed during the first 12 months was determined. MRI data were processed using FreeSurfer. Repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted using regional volume or thickness as the dependent variable, and the interaction between number of sessions (continuous scale) and study visit as the independent variable. Baseline age and sex, as well as their interactions with time were included in the model. FDR‐adjusted p‐values <0.05 were considered significant.ResultGreater number of sessions completed was associated with less brain atrophy over 12 months in the hippocampus and parahippocampus, and less ventricular expansion in the lateral and inferior lateral ventricles (Table 1, Figure 1; FDR‐corrected p<0.05 for interaction term). Results remained unchanged when including exercise type (AX vs. SBR), baseline CDR‐SB, or baseline plasma Aβ42/40 in the model. Findings were similar when analyses were restricted to participants who completed the study prior to the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic.ConclusionOur results show that higher adherence to a supervised exercise intervention over 12 months was associated with reduced brain atrophy in adults with amnestic MCI. These findings were obtained in post‐hoc, exploratory analyses, so causality should be interpreted with caution. EXERT was supported by the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study and funded by the National Institutes of Health grant U19‐AG010483.

A 10 Year Analysis of Gender Distribution in National Institutes of Health Funding for Non-Malignant Hematology

Introduction: Historically, there has been an underrepresentation of women in the field of hematology. Consequently, this makes them less likely to receive academic research grants. Here, we present a ten year retrospective analysis of the Research Project Grants (R01) awarded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through the fiscal years of 2012-2022. The grants were categorized by various NIH agencies. This temporal analysis examines gender disparities under the field of non-malignant hematology research. Methods:Data was extracted for the fiscal years 2012-2022 focusing exclusively on R01 grants awarded and categorized by the various NIH agencies. Data was leveraged using the NIH RePORTER tool, Tidyverse, and janitor packages in R. The dataset incorporated key grant parameters such as grant ID, agency code, activity code, abstract text, project title, fiscal year, activity status, award amount, organization, and principal investigator's(PI) name. In order to distinguish a PI's gender, PI's first names were processed using the gender package in R, which provided a gender-wise distribution of recipients. For statistical analyses, proportions of females with accepted R01 grants were compared between 2012 to 2022; this proportion analysis was also done among each NIH agency. Further, linear regression and associated statistical tests were used to identify whether there was significant change in grants received by either gender over this time period. Results: A total of 250,031 R01 grants were awarded by the NIH during the fiscal years of 2012 to 2022. Females (n=82,152: 32.9% (95% CI 0.41-0.43) received fewer grants than males (n=167,879: 67.1%, (95% CI 0.50-0.55). Across 2012 to 2022, there was no significant change in R01 grants awarded among men (16,221 to 15,601, p-value= 0.52). In contrast, there was a significant difference for females in the R01 grants awarded across 2012 to 2022 (6,865 to 9,339, p-value <0.001). In 2012, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), and National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) awarded less than 25% of the total grants to females. By 2022, of all the agencies, the NBIB remained the agency with the most extensive gender gap with females being awarded only 23% of grants. In contrast, the National Institute of Minority Health and Disparities (NIMHD) and the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) were the only agencies in 2012 to award more grants to females with approximately 52% and 74% of grants respectively. In 2022, the NINR and NIHMD continued to show more grants awarded to females versus males. In addition to those agencies, by 2022, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development(NICHD) and National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) joined the NINR and NIHMD in awarding more than 50% of grants awarded to females that year. Conclusion: This analysis highlights continued gender disparity as only 33% of total R01 NIH grants were awarded to females during the fiscal years 2012-2022 in non-malignant hematologic research. Although, it is noted that while some agencies have made strides towards gender parity, others continue to have a significant gap. While this remains a systemic and multifaceted issue, identifying these areas of gender disparity will enable targeted efforts to bridge this gap and advance gender equality.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure and thyroid cancer risk

Although per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure is a potential contributor to the increasing thyroid cancer trend, limited studies have investigated the association between PFAS exposure and thyroid cancer in human populations. We therefore investigated associations between plasma PFAS levels and thyroid cancer diagnosis using a nested case-control study of patients with thyroid cancer with plasma samples collected at/before cancer diagnosis. 88 patients with thyroid cancer using diagnosis codes and 88 healthy (non-cancer) controls pair-matched on sex, age (±5 years), race/ethnicity, body mass index, smoking status, and year of sample collection were identified in the BioMe population (a medical record-linked biobank at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York); 74 patients had papillary thyroid cancer. Eight plasma PFAS were measured using untargeted analysis with liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry and suspect screening. Associations between individual PFAS levels and thyroid cancer were evaluated using unconditional logistic regression models to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). There was a 56% increased rate of thyroid cancer diagnosis per doubling of linear perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (n-PFOS) intensity (ORadj, 1.56, 95% CI: 1.17-2.15, P=0.004); results were similar when including patients with papillary thyroid cancer only (ORadj, 1.56, 95% CI: 1.13-2.21, P=0.009). This positive association remained in subset analysis investigating exposure timing including 31 thyroid cancer cases diagnosed ≥1 year after plasma sample collection (ORadj, 2.67, 95% CI: 1.59-4.88, P<0.001). This study reports associations between exposure to PFAS and increased rate of (papillary) thyroid cancer. Thyroid cancer risk from PFAS exposure is a global concern given the prevalence of PFAS exposure. Individual PFAS studied here are a small proportion of the total number of PFAS supporting additional large-scale prospective studies investigating thyroid cancer risk associated with exposure to PFAS chemicals. National Institutes of Health grants and The Andrea and Charles Bronfman Philanthropies.

The national institute on drug abuse diversity scholars network: success for a diverse addiction science workforce.

There is a well-known lack of diversity in many Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. The gap in awarded National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants for scientists from underrepresented populations at the early stages of their careers contributes significantly to this lack of diversity. The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Diversity Scholars Network (NDSN) program implemented a new model in 2016 to provide support to underrepresented early-career investigators (ECIs) by equipping them to navigate the competitive NIH grant process. NDSN has a demonstrable track record of providing equity through educational opportunities by enhancing the grant funding success of participants. Of 59 participants from 2016 through 2021, 53% received funding within the first two years after completing the program and 69% by four years. NDSN scholars surmount systemic funding barriers by building relationships with scientific coaches, mentors, NIDA Program Officials and intentionally engaging in network building, which all contribute to the funding success of ECIs. NIDA's NDSN program provides a model for retaining underrepresented ECIs that not only benefits individual scholars, but also the institutions they serve and society as a whole.

Orthopedic surgeon-scientist representation is low among National Institutes of Health grants for rotator cuff research

The purpose of this study is to characterize National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for rotator cuff research and evaluate the impact of orthopedic surgeons on this portfolio. The NIH's Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results database was queried for "rotator cuff repair" or "rotator cuff tear" from the 2011 to 2021 fiscal years. Compound annual growth rates were calculated and grants were categorized by basic, clinical, or translational research. Funding totals were compared by Principal Investigator (PI) and grant characteristics. A total of 52 grants were awarded to 38 PIs between 2011 and 2021, totaling $40,156,859. Annual NIH funding for rotator cuff tear and rotator cuff repair increased by a Compound annual growth rate of 11.0% from 2011 to 2021, compared to 3.4% for the total NIH budget. Orthopedic surgeon-scientists received $9,208,212 (22.9%), most commonly through R01 (80.5%) and K08 (7.1%) mechanisms. No significant difference in funding was found by PI sex (P=.332), degree (P=.460), academic rank (P=.118), or researcher type (P=.227). Professors had a higher h-index than associate and assistant professors (P=.001). Orthopedic surgeon-scientists had a higher h-index (mean 36.3±9.4) compared to clinician-scientists (mean 8.0±1.4) and research-scientists (35.5±40.7) (P=.044). Clinical topics receiving the highest funding were rehabilitation (23.9%), diagnosis, (22.3%) and surgical technique (14.8%). Orthopedic surgeon-scientists acquired funding for diagnosis (57.1%), rehabilitation (17.0%), and surgical technique (14.5%). While NIH funding for rotator cuff research is growing, orthopedic surgeon representation is low. Future studies should evaluate barriers to obtaining funding for orthopedic surgeon-scientists.

Academic productivity and NIH funding for anesthesiology departmental chairs: A 15-year comparison

Study objectiveThis study evaluated whether there were improvements in the number of departmental National Institutes of Health (NIH) training grants and the academic productivity of departmental chairs in terms of NIH research funding and PubMed-cited publications when compared to chairs of the same departments in 2006. DesignEach chair was identified from the Society of Academic Associations of Academic Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine's Association of Academic Anesthesiology Chairs and entered into the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORTER), PubMed, SCOPUS, and the National Provider Identifier Registry. MeasurementsThe number and funding amounts of training grants awarded to the department in 2010, 2015, and 2020 were obtained as well as the department's national ranking and total dollar amount for NIH funding in 2020. For the current chair cohort, total publications and m-quotient (h-index corrected for active research years) were recorded along with each chair's history of NIH grant funding. These data were compared to a previous study of anesthesiology chairs that reviewed funding and publications through 2006. Main resultsWe analyzed data from 100 academic departments of anesthesiology and compared their scholarly activity relative to data gathered in 2006. In 2020, 52 of 100 departments of anesthesiology had evidence of NIH funding. There were not statistically significant (P > 0.05) differences in grants funding obtained by chairs between 2006 and 2020 with the exception that more chairs in 2006 had program or center grants. Median publications for chairs significantly increased from 35 in 2006 to 55 in 2021 (IRR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.2–2.0, P = 0.003). Nineteen percent of chairs were female, which did not significantly differ from the proportion of women in the 2006 paper (15%, χ2 = 0.57, df = 1, P = 0.452). Of the male chairs, 90% were professors whereas 63% of female chairs were professors (χ2 = 8.8, df = 1, P = 0.003). Female chairs had fewer publications than male chairs (IRR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.2–1.8, P = 0.002); however, m-quotients were not significantly different between men and women (P = 0.602). ConclusionsWhen compared to 2006, department of anesthesiology chairs had more publications in 2021; however, NIH funding rates remained unchanged. The specialty had 19% female chairs, and those chairs had fewer publications than their male counterparts, though sex differences were attenuated using metrics that account for disparities in career length.

Gender Differences in Academic Rank, Leadership, and Awards Among NIH Grant Recipients in Diagnostic Radiology.

Objective: Females have been traditionally underrepresented in academia across multiple medical specialties, including radiology. The present study investigated primary investigators (PIs) who received National Institutes of Health (NIH) radiology funding between 2016 and 2019 to establish if there was a correlation between NIH grants, gender, academic rank, first and second tier leadership positions, geographic location, and professional awards. Materials and Methods: Funding information was obtained from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditure and Results (RePORTER) website for 2016-2019. Information for each PI was obtained from academic institutional websites, LinkedIn, and Doximity. Mann-Whitney U tests and chi-square analyses were performed to compare and determine associations between gender and the stated variables of interest. Results: Of the 805 radiology PIs included in this study, 78% were male. There was a significant association of gender with the attainment of the highest academic rank (p = 0.026), with females occupied more of the assistant professor ranks (M:F = 1:1.5) and less of the professor ranks (F:M = 1:1.2). Between genders, there was no significant difference in first and second tier leadership positions (p = 0.497, p = 0.116), and postgraduate honors and awards (p = 0.149). The greatest proportion of grants was awarded in the setting of sole male PIs (55%) and the least proportion of grants were awarded when the contact PI and other project leader were female (1%). Conclusion: Despite having similar academic credentials, including number of leadership positions and postgraduate honors and awards, female radiology PIs who have received NIH grants continue to be underrepresented in higher academic ranks.

A prospective preconception cohort study of the association between Mycoplasma genitalium and fecundability in Kenyan women trying to conceive.

Is Mycoplasma genitalium-infection associated with reduced fecundability? Preconception M. genitalium-infection was associated with 27% lower fecundability though confidence intervals were wide, and the association between M. genitalium and fecundability may be dependent on concurrent bacterial vaginosis (BV). M. genitalium has been associated with cervicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, and preterm birth, but the extent to which M. genitalium is causally related to adverse reproductive sequelae in women is debated. Kenyan women enrolled in a prospective preconception cohort provided vaginal fluid specimens and underwent monthly pregnancy testing. Stored samples from 407 women who had been trying to conceive for ≤6 months were tested for M. genitalium using a nucleic acid amplification test. Data on first day of last menstrual period, sexual behavior, pregnancy status, and vaginal specimens were collected at monthly preconception visits. The association between M. genitalium detected at the visit prior to each pregnancy test and fecundability was estimated using discrete time proportional probabilities models. Secondary analyses explored the influence of concurrent BV on the association between M. genitalium and fecundability. The 407 participants experienced 1220 menstrual cycles and 213 pregnancies. The prevalence of M. genitalium at enrollment was 7.7%. After adjustment for age, frequency of condomless sex in the last 4 weeks, and study site, M. genitalium was associated with a 27% lower fecundability, but confidence intervals were wide (adjusted fecundability ratio (aFR) 0.73, 95% CI 0.44, 1.23). In secondary analyses, when compared to cycles without M. genitalium or BV at the visit prior, women with both M. genitalium and BV at the visit prior had a 51% lower fecundability (aFR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.22, 1.09) whereas there was no association of M. genitalium alone (aFR = 0.98 (95% CI 0.54, 1.76)), and a smaller reduction in fecundability for women with BV only (aFR = 0.80 (95% CI 0.60, 1.07)). Results should be interpreted cautiously given the relatively low prevalence of M. genitalium and wide confidence intervals. In this cohort of Kenyan women trying to conceive, the association between M. genitalium and fecundability was influenced by concurrent BV status, suggesting there may be a synergistic effect of M. genitalium and BV on fecundability. This work was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant (NICHD R01 HD087346-RSM). R.S.M. received additional support for mentoring (NICHD K24 HD88229). E.M.L. was supported by pre- and post-doctoral fellowships (NIAID T32 AI07140, NICHD F32 HD100202). Data collection and management were completed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at the University of Washington's Institute of Translational Health Science supported by grants from NCATS/NIH (UL1 TR002319). The content of this paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. R.S.M. receives research funding, paid to the University of Washington, from Hologic Corporation and consulting fees from Lupin Pharmaceuticals. L.E.M. receives research funding and material for research studies, paid to the University of Washington, from Hologic Corporation and Nabriva Therapeutics, travel support from Hologic, and consulting fees from Health Advances. E.M.L.'s contributions to this study primarily occurred while affiliated with the University of Washington; at the time of submission, E.M.L. was an employee of and holds stock or stock grants for AbbVie, Inc. The other authors have no conflicts of interest. N/A.

Scholarly activity following National Institutes of Health Women’s Reproductive Health Research K12 training—a cohort study

National Institutes of Health funding to address basic reproductive health for common female conditions remains disproportionately low, in part because of low success rates of grant applications by obstetrician-gynecologists. This study aimed to evaluate the scholarly productivity of individuals supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Women's Reproductive Health Research K12 career development award, created to advance careers of obstetrician-gynecologist physician-scientists. We performed a cohort study of individuals who completed at least 2 years of Women's Reproductive Health Research training by June 30, 2015, and had at least 5-year follow-up. Earliest training start date was December 1, 1998. Primary outcomes from public data sources (National Institutes of Health RePORTER, PubMed, iCite) were (1) number of total and R01 National Institutes of Health grants as principal investigator; (2) numbers of total and first and last author publications; and (3) median and highest publication impact factor measured by the relative citation ratio. Secondary outcomes from an email survey subcohort were total number of research grants, federally funded grants, and number of National Institutes of Health grants as coinvestigator; institutional promotions and academic appointments, national and National Institutes of Health leadership roles; and career and mentorship satisfaction. Outcomes were recorded at 5, 10, and 15 years postgraduation, and aggregate anonymized data were divided into 3 groups using Women's Reproductive Health Research completion dates: June 30 of 2005, 2010, and 2015. Temporal trends were assessed. Results were stratified by gender, number of awarded grant cycles (1-2 vs 3-4), and specialty type. Analyses used Fisher exact or Pearson chi-square tests, and Mantel-Haenszel tests of trend. The distribution of the cohort (N=178) by graduation completion date was: on or before June 30, 2005 (57 [32%]); July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2010 (60 [34%]); and July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2015 (61 [34%]). Most participants were female (112 [64%]) and maternal-fetal medicine trained (53 [30%]), followed by no fellowship (50 [28%]). Of the 178 participants, 72 (40%) received additional National Institutes of Health funding as a principal investigator, 45 (25%) received at least 1 R01, and 23 (13%) received 2 to 5 R01s. There were 52 (31%) scholars with >10 first author publications, 66 (39%) with >10 last author publications, and 108 (63%) with ≥25 publications. The highest relative citation ratio was a median of 8.07 (interquartile range, 4.20-15.16). There were 121 (71%) scholars with relative citation ratio ≥5, indicating >5-fold greater publication impact than that of other National Institutes of Health-funded scientists in similar areas of research. No differences by gender, institution, or temporal trends were observed. Of the full cohort, 69 (45.7%) responded to the survey; most self-identified as women (50 [73%]) and White (51 [74%]). Our findings suggest that the infrastructure provided by an institutional K award is an advantageous career development award mechanism for obstetrician-gynecologists, a group of predominantly women surgeons. It may serve as a corrective for the known inequities in National Institutes of Health funding by gender.

Benchmarking Accomplishments of Presidents Elected to Hand Surgery Societies in the United States

ObjectiveQualifications needed to achieve national leadership positions in hand surgery are poorly defined. This study compares the academic accomplishments, demographics, and training backgrounds of presidents elected to serve the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) and the American Association for Hand Surgery (AAHS). MethodsThe ASSH and AAHS provided names of elected Presidents (1990–2022, n = 64). Curriculum vitae and academic web sites were used to collect demographic, training, bibliometric, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding data of presidents. ResultsPresidents were predominately male (95%), Caucasian (90%), and orthopaedic surgery residency-trained (66%). Only 9% were racial minorities (8% Asian, 2% Hispanic, and 0% African American). The average age at appointment was 59 ± 7 years old, which was an average of 23 years from completion of hand surgery fellowship. More presidents received plastic surgery residency training in AAHS than ASSH (50 vs. 19%). The most represented hand surgery fellowships were Mayo Clinic (14%), University of Louisville (11%), and Duke University (9%). Twenty-one presidents participated in a travel fellowship (33%). Thirty presidents served as Department Chair or Division Chief at time of election (47%). The average h-index was 34 ± 18 resulting from 164 ± 160 peer-reviewed manuscripts and was similar between the two organizations. Eleven presidents had NIH grant funding (18%) and there were no differences in procurement or funding totals between the two organizations. ConclusionPresidents of American hand surgery societies obtain high levels of scholarly activity regardless of training specialty. Women and racial minorities remain underrepresented at the highest levels of leadership.

Limited number of spine surgeons among recipients of National Institutes of Health grants awarded for degenerative spine disease research.

Surgeon scientists remain underrepresented among recipients of National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants despite their unique ability to perform translational research. This study elucidates the portfolio of NIH grants awarded for degenerative spine diseases and the role of spine surgeons in this portfolio. The most common diagnoses and surgical procedures for degenerative spine diseases were queried on the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results (RePORTER) database (2011-2021). Total NIH funding was extracted for 20 additional clinical areas and compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) were calculated. A retrospective cohort study of principal investigators (PIs) was conducted. NIH grants and funding totals were extracted and compared to those from other clinical areas. The total NIH research budget increased from $31 to $43 billion over the 10-year period (CAGR 3.4%). A total of 273 unique grants equaling $91 million (CAGR 0%) were awarded for degenerative spine diseases. Diabetes ($11.8 billion, CAGR 0%), obesity ($10.6 billion, CAGR 3%), and chronic pain ($5.6 billion, CAGR 7%) received the most funding. Most NIH funding for degenerative spine disease research was awarded through the R01 (66%) and R44 (8%) grant mechanisms. The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases awarded the most NIH funding (64%). Departments of orthopedic surgery were awarded the most funding (32%). NIH funding supported clinical (28%), translational (37%), and basic science (35%) research. Disease mechanisms (58%), imaging modalities (20%), and emerging technologies (16%) received the most funding. Nineteen spine surgeons were identified as PIs (16%). There were no significant differences in NIH funding totals by PI demographic and academic characteristics (p > 0.05)-except for full professors, who had the most NIH funding (p = 0.007) and highest h-index values (p < 0.001). Few spine surgeons receive NIH grants for degenerative spine disease research. Future opportunities may exist for spine surgeons to collaborate in identified areas of clinical interest. Additional strategies are needed to increase NIH funding in spine surgery.

Twenty Years After the EMS Research Agenda: Trends in Emergency Medical Services Publications and Research Funding.

Since its publication in 2001, the National EMS Research Agenda has brought attention to a relative paucity of emergency medical services (EMS)-specific research and has called for an increase in funding and infrastructure to support EMS research. We investigated the trends in EMS-specific publications and National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded research grants in the 20 years since this landmark publication. We performed a structured PubMed search of English-language citations from 2001 to 2020 to identify publications with populations, settings, or topics related to EMS care, education, or operations. Publications in trade journals and studies not involving humans were excluded. We also queried NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results (RePORTER) using a similar structured search. Titles, keywords, and abstracts were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and nonlinear trends were described using segmented regression models. A total of 183,307 references met the search criteria in PubMed, and 4,281 grants were identified in NIH RePORTER. After removing duplicates, 152,408 titles were screened, with 17,314 (11.5%) included. EMS-related publications increased from 419 in 2001 to 1,788 in 2020, a 327% increase, compared with a 197% increase in total PubMed publications. There was a statistically significant nonlinear (J-shaped) increase in EMS publications after 2007. There were 1,166 funded EMS-related NIH grants, with a 469% increase from 2001 to 2020 compared with an 18% increase in overall NIH awards. Although total publications have doubled in the United States over the past 20 years, EMS-specific research has more than tripled and the number of funded EMS research grants has increased nearly 5-fold. Future evaluation should examine the quality of this research and its application to clinical practice.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and risk of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective cohort study

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs) have been associated with respiratory dysfunction during pregnancy and postpartum. In this study, we explored the associations between HDPs (gestational hypertension and preeclampsia) and the risk of incident asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during adulthood and the potential mediating role of chronic hypertension. We included parous nurses in the Nurses' Health Study II reporting a pregnancy lasting no less than 6 months. The associations between HDPs and asthma and COPD were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for confounders. We included 73,807 nurses [92.5% (68,246 of 73,807) White] in asthma analyses and 79,843 [92.4% (73,746 of 79,843) White] in COPD analyses, whose mean (SD, range) age, at baseline, were both 34.8 (4.7, 25.0-44.0) years. During 24 years of follow-up, we identified 2663 incident cases of asthma and 537 COPD. Compared with nurses without HDPs, nurses reporting HDPs had an increased HR for incident asthma and COPD of 1.22 (95% CI 1.10-1.36) and 1.39 (95% CI 1.11-1.74), respectively. The risk of asthma was similar when gestational hypertension and preeclampsia were assessed separately [HR=1.25 (95% CI 1.08-1.43) and 1.24 (95% CI 1.11-1.38), respectively]. However, only nurses with preeclampsia had a higher risk of COPD (HR=1.41, 95% CI 1.11-1.78). Mediation analyses estimated that chronic hypertension explained 18.6% (95% CI 8.9-35.0%) and 10.7% (95% CI 2.9-32.4%) of the associations between HDPs and asthma and COPD, respectively. HDPs may serve as useful markers of increased susceptibility to chronic respiratory diseases during adulthood. The National Institutes of Health grants.

Postdoctoral National Institutes of Health F32 Grants: Broken Pipeline in the Development of Surgeon-Scientists.

We examined trainees in surgery and internal medicine who received National Institutes of Health (NIH) F32 postdoctoral awards to determine their success rates in obtaining future NIH funding. Trainees participate in dedicated research years during residency (surgery) and fellowship (internal medicine). They can obtain an NIH F32 grant to fund their research time and have structured mentorship. We collected NIH F32 grants (1992-2021) for Surgery Departments and Internal Medicine Departments from NIH RePORTER, an online database of NIH grants. Nonsurgeons and noninternal medicine physicians were excluded. We collected demographic information on each recipient, including gender, current specialty, leadership positions, graduate degrees, and any future NIH grants they received. A Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous variables, and a χ 2 test was utilized to analyze categorical variables. An alpha value of 0.05 was used to determine significance. We identified 269 surgeons and 735 internal medicine trainees who received F32 grants. A total of 48 surgeons (17.8%) and 339 internal medicine trainees (50.2%) received future NIH funding ( P < 0.0001). Similarly, 24 surgeons (8.9%) and 145 internal medicine trainees (19.7%) received an R01 in the future ( P < 0.0001). Surgeons who received F32 grants were more likely to be department chair or division chiefs ( P =0.0055 and P < 0.0001). Surgery trainees who obtain NIH F32 grants during dedicated research years are less likely to receive any form of NIH funding in the future compared with their internal medicine colleagues who received F32 grants.

National Institutes of Health funding among vascular surgeons is rare

BackgroundThe National Institutes of Health (NIH) is an essential source of funding for vascular surgeons conducting research. NIH funding is frequently used to benchmark institutional and individual research productivity, help determine eligibility for academic promotion, and as a measure of scientific quality. We sought to appraise the current scope of NIH funding to vascular surgeons by appraising the characteristics of NIH-funded investigators and projects. In addition, we also sought to determine whether funded grants addressed recent Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) research priorities. MethodsIn April 2022, we queried the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results (RePORTER) database for active projects. We only included projects that had a vascular surgeon as a principal investigator. Grant characteristics were extracted from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results database. Principal investigator demographics and academic background information were identified by searching institution profiles. ResultsThere were 55 active NIH awards given to 41 vascular surgeons. Only 1% (41/4037) of all vascular surgeons in the United States receive NIH funding. Funded vascular surgeons are an average of 16.3 years out of training; 37% (n = 15) are women. The majority of awards (58%; n = 32) were R01 grants. Among the active NIH-funded projects, 75% (n = 41) are basic or translational research projects, and 25% (n = 14) are clinical or health services research projects. Abdominal aortic aneurysm and peripheral arterial disease are the most commonly funded disease areas and together accounted for 54% (n = 30) of projects. Three SVS research priorities are not addressed by any of the current NIH-funded projects. ConclusionsNIH funding of vascular surgeons is rare and predominantly consists of basic or translational science projects focused on abdominal aortic aneurysm and peripheral arterial disease research. Women are well-represented among funded vascular surgeons. Although the majority of SVS research priorities receive NIH funding, three SVS research priorities are yet to be addressed by NIH-funded projects. Future efforts should focus on increasing the number of vascular surgeons receiving NIH grants and ensuring all SVS research priorities receive NIH funding.

Survivorship science at the National Institutes of Health 2017-2021.

To describe the characteristics of National Institutes of Health (NIH) cancer survivorship grants funded over the past 5 years and identify gap areas for future efforts and initiatives. Research project grants (RPG) funded during Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 to 2021 focused on cancer survivorship were identified using a text mining algorithm of words from the NIH Research, Condition, and Disease Categorization (RCDC) thesaurus with survivorship-relevant terms. The title, abstract, specific aims, and public health relevance section of each grant were reviewed for eligibility. Grants meeting the eligibility criteria were double coded to extract study characteristics (e.g., grant mechanism, study design, study population). A total of 586 grants were funded by 14 NIH Institutes from FY2017 to FY2021, and the number of newly funded grants increased each FY, from 68 in 2017 to 105 in 2021. Approximately 60% of all grants included an intervention study, and interventions most often focused on psychosocial or supportive care (32.0%). The most common primary focus of the grants was late- and long-term effects of cancer treatment (46.6%), and least often financial hardship. The results of this portfolio analysis indicate overall growth in the number and breadth of grants over the last five years, although notable gaps persist. This review of current NIH grants suggests a need for expanded research to understand and address survivor needs to ensure that the over 18 million cancer survivors in the United States have optimal quality of life and health outcomes.

A funder-based comparison of global oncology research led by NCI-designated cancer centers: Results from the 2021 global oncology survey.

e18535 Background: Equitable global cancer research partnerships are key to reducing the global burden of cancer, which disproportionately affects low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). One indicator of equitable partnerships is the inclusion of LMIC investigators in global cancer research. In 2021 the National Cancer Institute (NCI) conducted a survey of the 71 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers about their global oncology activity. The survey results highlight cancer centers' non-NIH funded global cancer research, training, and capacity-building projects and complement data about global cancer research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This analysis presents NIH and non-NIH funded global oncology research led by cancer centers stratified by collaborator income class. Methods: NCI designed and fielded an online survey to cancer center global oncology contacts and principal investigators of research projects from July 2021 through January 2022. Data about NIH grants were sourced from internal NIH systems. Income classes are defined by the World Bank and analysis was conducted in Microsoft Excel and Python. A two proportion Z test was used to test for differences in collaborator income class between NIH grants and non-NIH funded projects. Results: Ninety-four percent (67/71) of cancer centers responded to the survey. Forty-seven cancer centers reported 257 global oncology projects with named international collaborating institutions in 2021. Comparatively, 69 cancer centers held 688 NIH cancer research grants with international collaborating institutions in 2021. These projects and grants had collaborators in 111 countries, including 72 LMICs. Projects and grants were stratified by whether they had collaborators only in high-income countries (HICs), only in LMICs, or in both HICs and LMICs, as shown in Table 1. Non-NIH funded global oncology projects were significantly more likely than NIH grants to have only LMIC collaborators (p = 0.0006) or both HIC and LMIC collaborators (p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions: While the inclusion of LMIC collaborators in research does not guarantee an equitable partnership nor effective research, it is one indicator of these efforts. The results of the global oncology survey demonstrate that cancer centers are committed to conducting research in LMICs and with LMIC institutions, and they are more likely to collaborate with LMIC institutions when supported by a non-NIH funder or by institutional funds. Further analysis is recommended to understand the extent to which research collaboration indicates equitable partnership, and the barriers and facilitators to collaboration posed by different funding sources. [Table: see text]