National Healthcare Safety Network Surveillance Research Articles

Ensuring Accuracy: Making the Case for Inter-rater Reliability in Hospital Acquired Infection Surveillance

Background: Infection preventionists (Ips) have self-reported surveillance as the most time-consuming job task (1,2). APIC’s MegaSurvey 2020 reported that 60% of Ips consider themselves proficient or expert within this competency domain (2). Accurate coding of health care acquired infections is critical to identifying epidemiologically significant events, using data to improve practice, and compliance with state and federal mandated CMS reporting (3,4). Validated case study scenarios were distributed to infection preventionists to better understand how experience level and time spent performing surveillance affects interrater reliability (IRR) in applying the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance definitions (5,6). Methods: Case study scenarios determined to have high item discrimination were added to an online test bank and distributed annually to Ips of varying experience levels and care settings as part of a mandatory training program (5). The test bank currently consists of forty-two validated questions. Each year, the participants receive approximately thirty questions, including twenty randomly selected from the test bank and ten beta scenarios under development. Only validated test bank scenarios are used to calculate the passing score of 85%. Participants are blinded to which questions are test bank scenarios versus beta scenarios. Additional information was gathered at the beginning of the test to determine CIC status, years of experience, and weekly hours spent doing surveillance. Data was analyzed for passing score on the first attempt for testing years 2019, 2021, 2022, and 2023. Results: Thirty-six Ips passed the IRR test on the first attempt (33%). Of those who passed on the first attempt, twenty-nine (81%) were certified and twenty-two (61%) reported at least nine hours a week performing surveillance. Of the seventy-three Ips (67%) who did not pass on the first attempt, thirty were certified (41%) and sixty (82%) reported performing surveillance for 8 hours or less per week. Conclusion: The first-time pass rate for certified and non-certified Ips was 33%, markedly lower than the self-reported proficiency rate of 60%. The majority of Ips who passed on the first attempt were certified and spent at least nine hours per week performing surveillance. certified and non-certified Ips who did not regularly perform surveillance as part of their weekly job tasks were less likely to pass the test on the first attempt. Given the first-time pass rate among all participants is below optimal, establishing inter-rater reliability systems and ongoing surveillance education for Ips is crucial to ensure accuracy of publicly reported data.

1429. Temperature and Humidity Variations in the Operating Room: A Risk Assessment

Abstract Background The American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) recommends that hospital operating rooms (OR) are controlled for temperature and humidity with established ranges but does allow for exceedances for surgeons and surgical procedures. There is currently no clear consensus or established thresholds for out-of-range temperature and humidity ranges in relation to risk for surgical site infections (SSI). A study was performed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) to further examine if temperature and humidity deviations pose a patient safety risk. Methods The study included 5600 surgical procedures that were performed at MSKCC between September 2021 and January 2022 where temperature and humidity logs were available. Procedures were broken into groups based on in- (n=4419) and out-of-range (n=1187) temperatures and in- (n=5225) and out-of-range (n=381) humidity. SSIs following the procedure were identified using targeted positive microbiology cultures and within NHSN (National Healthcare Safety Network) surveillance periods. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact statistical tests were used to determine if there was a significant difference between groups where p < 0.05. Breakdown of eligible procedures and follow up Table represents the total number of eligible procedures with environmental parameters and SSI follow up period. Results There was no significant impact on SSI for out-of-range humidity (p=0.15). There was a significantly higher SSI rate observed for out-of-range temperatures (p=0.04) more specifically low out- of-range temperatures (p=0.02). A sub-analysis was performed for low temperatures based on procedures by duration. Significance of the finding was lost when surgery duration was 4 hours or greater. Conclusion If there was a true correlation between SSI and low ambient temperature, we would have expected to see a strengthening of SSI risk with longer procedures. This study suggests that temperature and humidity deviations out of the recommended guidelines in the operating room do not pose additional risks for surgical site infections and limited exceedances can be permitted without risking patient safety. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

A comparison of National Healthcare Safety Network surveillance definitions to physician review for central-line-associated bloodstream infections.

For 147 hospital-onset bloodstream infections, we assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the National Healthcare Safety Network surveillance definitions of central-line-associated bloodstream infections against the gold standard of physician review, examining the drivers of discrepancies and related implications for reporting and infection prevention.

How COVID-19 spread varied by resident length of stay and resident–staff transmission pathways over time in US nursing homes

Background: Pathogen transmission among staff and residents in nursing homes can vary depending on their interactions and by the amount of time a resident receives care in the facility. Understanding the relative differences in transmission rates between and among staff and residents can identify the pathways that contributed most to the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in US nursing homes. Further exploring relative differences by categorizing facilities by residents’ lengths of stay can identify priority categories for intervention. Methods: Using US National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance data on resident and staff cases, vaccination, and resident deaths during June 2020–June 2022, we estimated SARS-CoV-2 transmission among and between residents and staff. We used a Bayesian inversion of a susceptible–exposed–infected–removed–virus–death (SEIRVD) compartmental model to produce the estimates. The facilities were divided into those with median length of stay (LOS) among the residents of 10 weeks. Additional inputs included the incidence and vaccination levels of the county where each facility was located. For the compartmental model, all data were averaged to form a representative facility for each category. Transmission was estimated separately for 3 periods: (1) June 2020–March 2021 as before the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant, (2) April 2021—October 2021 during SARS-CoV-2 delta variant dominance, and (3) November 2021—June 2022 during the prevalence of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant. Results: Regardless of facility category, transmission was highest from staff to residents or resident to resident (Fig.). These estimates of transmission were highest during the pre–SARS-CoV-2 delta variant phase. Transmission in that phase was highest in the facilities with LOS >10 weeks from staff to residents at 0.88 per week (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.06–1.85), in the facilities with LOS 6–10 weeks from staff to residents at 0.68 per week (95% CrI, 0.03–1.78), and in the facilities with LOS <6 weeks between residents at 0.47 per week (95% CrI, 0.02–0.95). Conclusions: Staff-to-resident or resident-to-resident transmission were the dominant pathways of spread of SARS-CoV-2 across the periods or the facility categories. Facilities with LOS 6 weeks or longer had higher median transmission estimates across the periods and transmission routes compared to facilities with LOS less than 6 weeks, implying that when prioritization of intervention resources is needed, facilities caring for populations with longer stays could be prioritized.Disclosures: None

A novel approach to correcting attribution of Clostridioides difficile in a healthcare setting.

To describe a novel attribution metric estimating the causal source location of healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile and compare it with the current US National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance reporting standard. Quality improvement study. Two acute care facilities. A novel attribution metric assigned days of attribution to locations where patients were located for 14 days before and the day of their C. difficile diagnosis. We correlated the NHSN-assigned unit attribution with the novel attribution measure and compared the proportion of attribution assigned to inpatient units. During a 30-month period, there were 727 NHSN C. difficile healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and 409 non-HAIs; the novel metric attributed 17,034 days. The correlation coefficients for NHSN and novel attributions among non-ICU units were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76-0.82) and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.70-0.78) and among ICU units were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.63-0.76) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.60-0.77) at facilities A and B, respectively. The distribution of difference in percent attribution showed higher inpatient unit attribution using NHSN measure than the novel attribution metric: 38% of ICU units and 15% of non-ICU units in facility A, and 20% of ICU units and 25% of non-ICU units in facility B had a median difference >0; no inpatient units showed a greater attribution using the novel attribution metric. The novel attribution metric shifts attribution from inpatient units to other settings and correlates modestly with NHSN methodology of attribution. If validated, the attribution metric may more accurately target C. difficile reduction efforts.

Device-associated healthcare-associated infections surveillance in an intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in COVID-19 patients

Background: Surveillance for healthcare-associated infections has a major role in hospital infection prevention and control programmes. In the present study, we estimated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on device-associated healthcare-associated infections (DA-HAI) ventilator-associated events (VAE), central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). Methods: This was a prospective surveillance study from January 2021 to June 2021 conducted in a 30-bed intensive care unit (ICU) of tertiary care, and academic healthcare organisations. Targeted surveillance was carried out by the National Healthcare Safety Network surveillance requirements of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Results: A total of 249 patients admitted to the ICU with 2920 patient days of surveillance data were included during the study. A DA-HAIs attack rate of 17.67/100 admissions was seen during the study. The device utilisation ratios of central line, ventilator and urinary catheters were 0.49, 0.60 and 0.83, respectively. VAE, CLABSI and CAUTI rates were 12.44, 6.91 and 9.01/1000 device days, respectively. Among 54 DA-HAIs reported, pathogens could be identified for 41 DA-HAI cases. The most common organisms causing VAE, CAUTI and CLABSI were Acinetobacter baumannii (42.1%), Escherichia coli (30%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (41.7%), respectively. Of the Gram-negative organisms 61.7% were carbapenem resistant and 50% of Staphylococcus aureuswere methicillin resistant. Conclusions: The present study shows high rates of ICU-acquired DA-HAIs and moderately high resistance patterns of the organisms causing HAIs, which poses a great risk to patient safety.

Decreasing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) at a community academic medical center using a multidisciplinary team employing a multi-pronged approach during the COVID-19 pandemic

In the midst of the COVID – 19 pandemic, a multidisciplinary team implemented evidence-based strategies to eliminate catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), as defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance definition for those units included in the NHSN standardized infection ratio. The team evaluated indwelling urinary catheters daily for indication, implemented a urinary catheter order set, established a urinary catheter insertion checklist, and promoted use of external urinary diversion devices. The facility NHSN standardized infection ratio for CAUTI was 0.37 in 2019, 0.23 in 2020, and 0.00 in 2021. A collaborative approach decreasing hospital acquired infections may be effective even in a climate of increased acuity, increased length of stay, and staffing challenges.

Novel Approaches to Healthcare-Associated Infection Surveillance Validation Using Cohen's Kappa

<h3>Background</h3> The Infection Prevention and Control Department (IPC) at an acute care pediatric facility is required, by state law, to report all healthcare-associated infections (HAI) using the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance definitions. Due to the definitions being subjective, interpretation could impact data integrity. A novel surveillance validation program was created in 2018 as an internal approach for validation and continuous surveillance education. The aim of this project is to assess the quality assurance program for consistently identifying HAIs between Infection Preventionists (IP) across IPC. <h3>Methods</h3> Validators, who are expert IPs, investigated randomly sampled infection events that were already investigated by an IP in the department. They performed chart review and documented in a data collection tool if the infections were reportable to NHSN with supporting rationale. Discrepancies were identified and cases were adjudicated. IPC utilized a statistical method, Cohen's Kappa, to determine inter-rater reliability between the validator response and original documentation monthly. Inter-rater reliability was examined per month and plotted to show trends in surveillance competency. <h3>Results</h3> One hundred and thirty-one infections were chosen for validation between July 2020 and April 2021. Cohen's kappa for two raters was calculated for each month. The median and interquartile range for the monthly kappa values were 1.00 [0.83 - 1.00] which is well above the values of 0.60 - 0.80 considered to have substantial agreement. The minimum and maximum kappa values were 0.76 and 1.00 respectively. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Overall, this study confirms that the use of Cohen's Kappa is a unique asset to the department's surveillance validation program and allows us to assess inter-rater reliability continually and easily. IPC programs could benefit from statistical analyses in evaluating data integrity and management.

Bridging the gap: introduction of an antimicrobial peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in response to high PICC central line-associated bloodstream infection incidence.

To reduce the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) through the introduction of an antimicrobial (AM) catheter as recommended in evidence-based guidelines and standards. Quality improvement project comparing incidence of infections pre-implementation and postimplementation of the new catheter. A 582-bed community teaching hospital in Northwest Indiana. Pre-implementation analysis of surveillance data indicated that 50% of CLABSIs occurred inpatients with PICCs in situ. A gap analysis was performed to review institutional practices against evidence-based recommendations. The use of an AM catheter was supported in each of the documents consulted. After introduction of the new device, performance was measured in a prospective manner using standardized Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance protocols for CLABSI and internal data sources for other measures. After 30 months of data collection, the PICC CLABSI incidence reduced from a baseline rate of 1.83/1000 PICC days to 0.162/1000 PICC days (91.15% reduction, P=0.0002). Combined with continued compliance with basic prevention strategies (ie use of a central line insertion checklist/insertion bundle) and optimization of device selection and lumen justification, the introduction of an antimicrobial/antithrombogenic (AM/AT) PICC was associated with a significant reduction in CLABSI.

Factors related to the accurate application of NHSN surveillance definitions for CAUTI and CLABSI in Texas hospitals: A cross-sectional survey

Previous studies indicate variability in the accurate application of National Healthcare Safety Network surveillance criteria with limited data on possible contributing factors. In this cross-sectional, convenience sampled web-based survey sent to members of Texas infection prevention and control organizations, training, experience, and time spent on surveillance was collected and assessed including 2 case studies. Our results indicate correct identification of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria may be associated with 2019 National Healthcare Safety Network training (CAUTI: aOR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.80; CLABSI: aOR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.045, 4.56) and increased years of infection prevention experience (CAUTI: aOR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.42, 4.33; CLABSI: aOR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.24, 6.38). Routinely performing more hours of surveillance may increase accuracy of CLABSI identification, but not CAUTI.

Factors Related to the Accurate Application of NHSN Surveillance Definitions for CAUTI and CLABSI in Texas Hospitals

Background Previous studies indicate inconsistent knowledge and application of the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance definitions used to report Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI). Our study aims to determine factors associated with accurate application of the surveillance criteria. Methods Members of Texas Infection Prevention (IP) professional organizations were emailed a web-based survey in January 2020. Respondents answered demographic and other questions related to 2019 NHSN trainings completed and applied NHSN definitions to case scenarios on Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) and Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI). This cross-sectional study used logistic regression models to estimate associations between years of experience, hours spent on surveillance, NHSN trainings, and respondents’ ability to identify correct HAI criterion. Results Eighty-eight IPs responded to the survey. Twenty-five of 65 respondents (38%) who completed CAUTI training identified correct CAUTI criterion and 6 of 63 (10%) who completed CLABSI training identified correct CLABSI criterion. CAUTI training was associated with higher odds of accurately identifying CAUTI (Odds Ratio (OR) = 4.92, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.2, 20.5) after adjusting for years of experience and hours spent on surveillance. Similar patterns of association were observed between completion of CLABSI training and correctly identifying CLABSI, but the result was not significant (OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 0.2, 23.8). Compared to those spending less time on NHSN surveillance ( 16 hours/week) had lower odds of identifying CAUTI but higher odds of identifying CLABSI. Conclusions Limited studies demonstrate variability in the accurate application of NHSN surveillance definitions. Possible factors contributing to this variability are also lacking. Our results suggest that recent NHSN training and more years of IP experience may be associated with increased accuracy of HAI identification. However, spending more time with NHSN surveillance every week may not improve one's ability to identify CAUTI.

Bridging the Gap: Introduction of an Antimicrobial Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) in Response to High PICC Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Incidence

Highlights Abstract Objective: To reduce the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) through the introduction of an antimicrobial (AM) catheter as recommended in evidence-based guidelines and standards. Design: Quality improvement project comparing incidence of infections pre-implementation and postimplementation of the new catheter. Setting: A 582-bed community teaching hospital in Northwest Indiana. Methods: Pre-implementation analysis of surveillance data indicated that 50% of CLABSIs occurred in patients with PICCs in situ. A gap analysis was performed to review institutional practices against evidence-based recommendations. The use of an AM catheter was supported in each of the documents consulted. After introduction of the new device, performance was measured in a prospective manner using standardized Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance protocols for CLABSI and internal data sources for other measures. Results: After 30 months of data collection, the PICC CLABSI incidence reduced from a baseline rate of 1.83/1000 PICC days to 0.162/1000 PICC days (91.15% reduction, P = 0.0002). Conclusion: Combined with continued compliance with basic prevention strategies (i.e., use of a central line insertion checklist/insertion bundle) and optimization of device selection and lumen justification, the introduction of an antimicrobial/antithrombogenic (AM/AT) PICC was associated with a significant reduction in CLABSI.

Secular trends of Blood stream infections in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients 72 hours prior to death.

Blood stream infections (BSI) frequently cause morbidity and mortality in allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. Characteristics of causative organisms shortly before death have not been previously described. Early treatment with antimicrobial agents targeting the recent surge in multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens may lead to better outcomes. This is retrospective study including 529 allo HCT recipients who died between 2000 and 2013. All patients who had BSI that happened 72hours before death were included. BSI and criteria for antimicrobial resistance were defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Healthcare Safety Network surveillance criteria. Overall, 104 BSI were identified from 91 patients. Bacterial infections accounted for 87% of the infections which were comprised by 37% gram-negative organisms and 50% gram-positive bacteria. The most common species were Enterococcus (30%), Staphylococcus (16%), and Pseudomonas (16%). Most enterococci were vancomycin resistant (87%), 100% of staphylococci were resistant to methicillin, and 64% of Pseudomonas were MDR. Over time there was a significant increase in vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (P=.01) and gram-negative BSI (P=.01). Blood stream infections were either the primary or secondary cause of death in 53% of patients. In allo HCT recipients, vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections caused the majority of BSI 72hours prior to death. Our findings provide information that may guide empiric antibiotic coverage in critically ill HCT recipients.

Concordance between the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Surveillance Criteria and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) Criteria for Diagnosis of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (VAP).

Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common hospital-acquired infections among mechanically ventilated patients and the incidence rates are widely used as an index of quality of care given in an ICU. Since there is no gold standard method available to diagnose VAP, the incidence rate varies based on different criteria used for calculation. Therefore, we conducted a study to determine the concordance between the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance criteria and clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) criteria for the diagnosis of VAP.Materials and methods: This was a prospective study that evaluated patients in the medical intensive care units (MICUs) of a tertiary care hospital, India, who were intubated for >48 hours between October 2018 and September 2019. All the patients (n = 273) were followed up daily and assessed using both CPIS and NHSN surveillance criteria for diagnosing VAP.Results: Of these 273 patients, 93 patients (34.1%) had VAP according to CPIS criteria as compared with 33 patients (12.1%) using the NHSN criteria. The corresponding rates of VAP were 39.59 vs 11.53 cases per 1,000 ventilator days, respectively. The agreement of the two sets of criteria was fairly good (kappa statistics, 0.42)Conclusion: The NHSN surveillance criteria have a lower sensitivity in detecting VAP cases and have to be modified to achieve better results.How to cite this article: Gunalan A, Sistla S, Sastry AS, Venkateswaran R. Concordance between the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Surveillance Criteria and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) Criteria for Diagnosis of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (VAP). Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(3):296–298.

Decreasing External Ventricular Drain Infection Rates in the Neurocritical Care Unit: 12-Year Longitudinal Experience at a Single Institution

External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is a common neurosurgical procedure, and EVD-related infection is a significant complication. We examined the effect of infection control protocol changes on EVD-related infection incidence. Changes in EVD placement protocol and incidence density of infections after implementation of protocol changes in the neurocritical care unit were tracked from 2007 to 2019. EVD infections were defined using a modified U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Healthcare Safety Network surveillance definition of meningitis/ventriculitis for patients with EVDs in situ for at least 2 days confirmed by positive culture. Contribution of protocol changes to EVD infection risk was assessed via multivariate regression. Fifteen major changes in EVD protocol were associated with a reduction in infections from 6.7 to 2.0 per 1000 EVD days (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-5.3; P<0.001). Gram-positive bacterial infection incidence decreased from 4.8 to 1.7 per 1000 EVD days (95% CI, 2.3-3.9; P= 0.00882) and gram-negative infection incidence decreased from 1.9 to 0.5 per 1000 EVD days (95% CI, 0.6-2.3; P= 0.0303). Of all protocol changes since 2007, the largest reduction in incidence was 3.9 infections per 1000 days (95% CI, 0.50-7.30; P= 0.011), associated with combined standardization of reduced EVD sampling frequency, cutaneous antisepsis with alcoholic chlorhexidine before EVD placement, and use of a subcutaneous tunneling technique during EVD insertion. The most significant reduction in EVD infections may be achieved through the combination of reducing EVD sampling frequency and standardizing alcoholic chlorhexidine cutaneous antisepsis and subcutaneous tunneling of the EVD catheter.

Health Care-associated infections studies project: An American Journal of Infection Control and National Healthcare Safety Network data quality collaboration case study

This National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance case study is part of a case-study series in the American Journal of Infection Control (AJIC). These cases reflect some of the complex patient scenarios Infection preventionists have encountered in their daily surveillance of health care-associated infections using NHSN definitions. Objectives have been previously published.

Effect of Perioperative Subglottic Secretion Drainage on Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia After Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective, Before-and-After Study

Although postoperative subglottic secretion drainage prevents ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) after cardiac surgery, its role during the perioperative period is unclear. For the present study, the effect of subglottic secretion drainage during and after cardiac surgery on postoperative VAP was investigated. Retrospective, single-center, before-and-after study. Perioperative care of cardiac surgical patients in a tertiary university hospital. Adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery from January 2013-December 2018. Conventional and subglottic suctioning endotracheal tubes were used in the control and intervention groups before and after a change in institutional policy, respectively. In the intervention group, subglottic secretion drainage was performed continuously during surgery and intermittently after surgery. The risk of postoperative VAP, identified by the National Healthcare Safety Network surveillance definition algorithm, was compared by weighted logistic regression. Logistic regression analyses, with propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting, also were performed. A total of 2,576 patients were analyzed (control [n = 2108]; intervention [n = 468]). Postoperative VAP occurred less frequently in the intervention group (1/468 [0.2%]) compared with the control group (30/2,108 [1.4%]). In the multivariate weighted logistic regression analysis, the risk of VAP after cardiac surgery was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (odds ratio 0.29; 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.58). Similar results were obtained in multivariate analyses after propensity score matching (odds ratio 0.04; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.14) and inverse probability weighting (odds ratio 0.16; 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.42). Routine perioperative subglottic secretion drainage using subglottic suctioning endotracheal tubes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery was associated with a reduction in the risk of VAP after surgery.

Interrater Reliability: Item Analysis to Develop Valid Questions for Case-Study Scenarios

Background: Development of an interrater reliability (IRR) process for healthcare-associated infection surveillance is a valuable learning tool for infection preventionists (IPs) and increases accuracy and consistency in applying National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions (1-3). Case studies from numerous resources were distributed to infection preventionists of varying experience levels (4-6). Item analysis, including item difficulty index and item discrimination index, was applied to individual test questions to determine the validity of the case scenarios at measuring individual mastery of the NHSN surveillance definitions (7-8). Methods: Beginning in 2016, a mandatory internal IRR program was developed and distributed to infection preventionists (IPs) of varying experience level. Each year through 2019, a test containing 30–34 case studies was developed with multiple-choice questions. Case studies were analyzed using 2 statistical methods to determine item difficulty and validity of written scenarios. P values for each test question were calculated using the item difficulty index formula, with harder questions resulting in values closer to 0.0. Point biserial correlation was applied to each question to determine highly discriminating questions, measured in a range from −1.0 and 1.0. Results: Between 2016 and 2019, 124 questions were developed and 145 respondents participated in the mandatory IRR program. The overall test difficulty was 0.70 (range, 0.64–0.74). Moreover, 17 questions (14%) were determined to have high “excellent” discrimination, 41 questions (33%) were determined to have “good” discrimination, 57 questions (46%) were determined to have “poor” discrimination, and 9 questions (7%) were found to have negative discrimination values. Conclusions: IRR testing identifies educational opportunities for IPs responsible for the correct application of NHSN surveillance definitions. Valid test scenarios are foundational components of IRR tests. Case scenarios that are determined to have a high discrimination index should be used to develop future test questions to better assess mastery of application of surveillance definitions to clinical cases.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

National Reporting Trend for HO-MRSA Bacteremia LabID Events, 2010–2018

Background: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) has included surveillance of laboratory-identified (LabID) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia events since 2009. In 2013, the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) began requiring acute-care hospitals (ACHs) that participate in the CMS Inpatient Quality Reporting program to report MRSA LabID events to the NHSN and, in 2015, ACHs were required to report MRSA LabID events from emergency departments (EDs) and/or 24-hour observation locations. Prior studies observed a decline in hospital-onset MRSA (HO-MRSA) rates in national studies over shorter periods or other surveillance systems. In this analysis, we review the national reporting trend for HO-MRSA bacteremia LabID events, 2010–2018. Method: This analysis was limited to MRSA bacteremia LabID event data reported by ACHs that follow NHSN surveillance protocols. The data were restricted to events reported for overall inpatient facility-wide and, if applicable, EDs and 24-hour observation locations. MRSA events were classified as HO (collected &gt;3 days after admission) or inpatient or outpatient community onset (CO, collected ≤3 days after admission). An interrupted time series random-effects generalized linear model was used to examine the relationship between HO-MRSA incidence rates (per 1,000 patient days) and time (year) while controlling for potential risk factors as fixed effects. The following potential risk factors were evaluated: facility’s annual survey data (facility type, medical affiliation, length of facility stay, number of beds, and number of intensive care unit beds) and quarterly summary data (inpatient and outpatient CO prevalence rates). Result: The number of reporting ACHs increased during this period, from 473 in 2010 to 3,651 in 2018. The crude HO-MRSA incidence rates (per 1,000 patient days) have declined over time, from a high of 0.067 in 2011 to 0.052 in 2018 (Table 1). Compared to 2014, the adjusted annual incidence rate increased in 2015 by 16.38%, (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.26%–22.84%; P &lt; .0001). After controlling for all significant risk factors, the estimated annual HO-MRSA incidence rates declined by 5.98% (95% CI, 5.17%–6.78%; P &lt; .0001) (Table 2). Conclusions: HO-MRSA bacteremia incidence rates have decreased over the past 9 years, despite a slight increase in 2015. This national trend analysis reviewed a longer period while analyzing potential risk factors. The decline in HO-MRSA incidence rates has been gradual; however, given the current trend, it is not likely to meet the Healthy People 2020 objectives. This analysis suggests the need for hospitals to continue and/or enhance HO-MRSA infection prevention efforts to reduce rates further.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Stopping the routine use of contact precautions for management of MRSA and VRE at three academic medical centers: An interrupted time series analysis

Contact precautions (CP) are a widely adopted strategy to prevent cross-transmission of organisms, commonly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). Some hospitals have discontinued CP for patients with MRSA or VRE; however, the impact on hospital-acquired infection rates (HAI) has not been assessed systematically. Retrospective multicenter interrupted time series between 2002 and 2017 at three academic hospitals. Participating hospitals discontinued CP for patients with contained body fluids who were colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE. The primary intervention was stopping the use of CP. Secondary interventions were horizontal infection prevention strategies. The primary outcomes were rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, mediastinal surgical site infection, and ventilator-associated pneumonia due to MRSA, VRE, or any organism using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Healthcare Safety Network surveillance definitions. Central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, mediastinal surgical site infection, and ventilator-associated pneumonia rates trended down at each institution. There were no statistically significant increases in these infections associated with discontinuing CP. Individual horizontal infection prevention strategies variably impacted HAI outcomes. Stopping the routine use of CP for patients with contained body fluids who are colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE did not result in increased HAIs. Bundled horizontal infection prevention strategies resulted in sustained HAI reductions.