National Guideline Clearinghouse Research Articles

Developing evidence-based clinical imaging guidelines for the diagnosis of vertically fractured teeth.

This study aimed to develop an evidence-based clinical imaging guideline for teeth suspected with vertical root fractures. An adaptation methodology based on the Korean Clinical Imaging Guidelines (K-CIG) was used in the guideline development process. After searching for guidelines using major databases such as Ovid-Medline, Elsevier-Embase, National Guideline Clearinghouse, and Guideline International Network, as well as domestic databases such as KoreaMed, KMbase, and KoMGI, two reviewers analyzed the retrieved articles. The retrieved articles were included in this review using well-established inclusion criteria. Twenty articles were identified through an online search, of which three were selected for guideline development. Based on these three guidelines, this study developed specific recommendations concerning the optimal imaging modality for diagnosing teeth suspected of vertical root fractures. Periapical radiography is the preferred method for assessing teeth with mastication-related pain and suspected vertical root fractures. However, if intraoral radiographs do not provide sufficient information about root fractures, a small FOV CBCT may be considered. However, the use of CBCT in endodontically treated teeth is significantly constrained by the presence of artificial shading.

Developing evidence-based clinical imaging guidelines for the diagnosis of vertically fractured teeth.

This study aimed to develop an evidence-based clinical imaging guideline for teeth suspected with vertical root fractures. An adaptation methodology based on the Korean Clinical Imaging Guidelines (K-CIG) was used in the guideline development process. After searching for guidelines using major databases such as Ovid-Medline, Elsevier-Embase, National Guideline Clearinghouse, and Guideline International Network, as well as domestic databases such as KoreaMed, KMbase, and KoMGI, two reviewers analyzed the retrieved articles. The retrieved articles were included in this review using well-established inclusion criteria. Twenty articles were identified through an online search, of which three were selected for guideline development. Based on these three guidelines, this study developed specific recommendations concerning the optimal imaging modality for diagnosing teeth suspected of vertical root fractures. Periapical radiography is the preferred method for assessing teeth with mastication-related pain and suspected vertical root fractures. However, if intraoral radiographs do not provide sufficient information about root fractures, a small FOV CBCT may be considered. However, the use of CBCT in endodontically treated teeth is significantly constrained by the presence of artificial shading.

Best evidence summary of sleep protection in premature infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: a narrative review.

Sleep influences the interaction between infants and their environment, as well as the achievement of crucial milestones in motor and language development. This is particularly significant for preterm infants in vulnerable positions. However, prematurely born infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are exposed to various stimuli such as noise and light, which disrupt their normal sleep patterns. This study assesses and consolidates the existing evidence on non-pharmacological strategies for protecting and promoting sleep in preterm infants. By providing an evidence-based data repository, it offers a valuable reference for clinical interventions. We conducted computer-based searches using various databases and resources, including UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO), Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), World Health Organization (WHO), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and China Biology Medicine disc (CBM). The search period spanned from January 2014 to May 2024. We have included a total of 22 articles in our review, comprising two guidelines, 11 systematic reviews, 1 evidence summary, 1 technical report, 2 practice recommendations, and 5 randomized controlled trials. The evidence was synthesized from eight domains: sleep team construction, risk factor assessment, sleep assessment tools, positional management, noise control, light management, sensory stimulation, and hospital-home transition sleep management, resulting in 27 pieces of evidence. This study summarizes the optimal evidence for the management of sleep in premature infants, providing empirical support for standardizing the management of sleep in premature infants. It is recommended that healthcare professionals judiciously apply the best evidence while considering the clinical context, thus promoting safe sleep for premature infants.

Consensus Committee of experts on Kawasaki Disease and Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics – the expert consensuses on intravenous immunoglobulin, aspirin, and glucocorticoid

Introduction and aim. Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute vasculitis with unknown etiology, usually occurring in chil dren under 5 years old. This article will summarize the three consensuses formulated in China about KD. Material and methods. English databases for consensus search include UpToDate, BMJ Clinical Evidence, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Joanna Briggs Institute Library, Cochrane Library, and PubMed, etc.; Chinese databases in clude China Biomedical Literature Service, China Knowledge Network, Wanfang database, etc. All literature searches ended on February 28, 2022. Analysis of the literature. KD is a common acquired heart disease in children and can lead to severe complications such as coronary injury. However, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) combined with oral aspirin (Asp) is currently recognized as the most effective treatment in KD acute stage and the first-line treatment to prevent cardiovascular complications. Glucocorticoid (GC) is mainly used for KD patients with a high risk of coronary artery aneurysm (CAA), no immunoglobulin response, and confirmed CAA. There are already consensus guidelines on diagnosing and treat ing KD in different countries. This article summarizes the relevant expert consensus on aspirin, glucocorticoids and IVIG for the treatment of Kawasaki disease in China. Conclusion. Still, there are inconsistent opinions in the literature on the mechanism, optimal timing, and dosage of medication for KD.

Current Approaches for the Diagnosis and Conservative Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence - A Guideline of Guidelines

Urologists utilize evidence-based guidelines organized by urological organizations in the management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The objective of this study is to provide guidance in the clinical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by reviewing key guidelines. We conducted a medical literature analysis in the following databases: PubMed, Medline, Embase, National Guideline Clearinghouse, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and Cochrane Library. We also manually searched the websites of the following international and national societies to identify relevant guidelines for inclusion in this review: the International Consultation on Incontinence, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Urogynecologic Society, American Urological Association/Society of Urodynamic, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, European Association of Urology, and Canadian Urological Association. The recommendations in the guidelines are summarized in different areas, including the diagnostic standards of SUI, examination and evaluation methods, and conservative treatment methods. This ‘guideline of guidelines’ presents the similarities and differences between prominent authorities in the management of SUI.

Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP)-A systematic review of the methodological quality of contact dermatitis clinical practice guidelines.

The Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP) assesses the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for high-burden skin diseases. This review focuses on contact dermatitis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO and Academic Search Premier for CPGs published between 1 November 2018 and 1 November 2023. Prespecified guideline resources were hand searched. Two authors independently undertook screening, data extraction and quality assessments. Instruments used were the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Reporting Checklist, the U.S. Institute of Medicine's (IOM) criteria of trustworthiness, The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's National Guideline Clearinghouse Extent Adherence to Trustworthy Standards (NEATS) Instrument and Lenzer's Red Flags. Twenty five CPGs were included, exhibiting heterogeneity in both the topics they addressed and their methodological quality. Whereas the CPGs on management of hand eczema from Denmark, Europe and the Netherlands scored best, most CPGs fell short of being clear, unbiased, trustworthy and evidence-based. Disclosure of conflicts of interest scored well, and areas needing improvement include 'strength and wording of recommendations', 'applicability', 'updating' and 'external review'. Adhering to AGREE II and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) enhances methodological quality.

Summary of best evidence for self-management in postoperative osteoporotic fracture patients

Osteoporotic fracture as a serious complication of osteoporosis which is usually treated surgically, and its recovery is closely related to one's own behavior and lifestyle, and is a long-term, complex management process that often requires the individual to self-manage many health-related factors. ObjectiveTo gather and synthesize the most robust evidence regarding self-management in patients with postoperative osteoporotic fractures, in order to provide scientific, evidence-based guidance for clinical healthcare professionals to assist postoperative patients in self-management efforts, and to assist patients in optimizing their self-management practices and behavioral norms. MethodsBased on the “6 S” pyramid model of evidence resources (System, Summaries, Synopses of synthesis, Syntheses, Synopses of studies, Studies), we searched the Up To Date, BMJ Best Practice, The Cochrane Library, Australian Joanna Briggs Institute JBI Evidence-Based Medicine Center Healthcare Database, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) and Scottish Intercollegiate Guide lines Network (SIGN), MedPulse, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, SinoMed, Chinese Medical Journal Full Text Database, CNKI, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and VIP database, etc, The search period for clinical decision-making, systematic evaluation, clinical guidelines, evidence summaries and expert consensus on self-management of postoperative osteoporotic fracture patients, and it was from the establishment of the database to 18 February 2023. To ensure the quality of the literature, three researchers strictly screened the literature according to the literature inclusion and exclusion criteria, and two or more researchers independently evaluated the quality of the included literature, and extracted and integrated the relevant evidence. ResultsThirteen documents were finally included, including 4 clinical practice guidelines, 5 expert consensus, 2 recommended practices, 1 systematic evaluation, and 1 clinical decision report. The research team summarized the evidence in 6 dimensions: multidisciplinary teamwork, management of daily living, management of treatment adherence, management of exercise, management of fall prevention and subsequent fracture, and management of emotions, and 33 pieces of evidence were extracted. ConclusionThe study summarized 33 best evidence of self-management in postoperative osteoporotic fracture patients, which provides a scientific and reasonable self-management program for postoperative patients, and also provides important reference and information for clinical healthcare professionals to provide more comprehensive and scientific self-management health education to patients.

Do the Directorate of Health’s guidelines adhere to international standards for trustworthy clinical practice?

The Norwegian Directorate of Health produces national clinical guidelines for the health service, and the development of guidelines must follow international standards for trustworthy clinical practice. We investigated whether the standards are being adhered to. We used the National Guideline Clearinghouse Extent Adherence to Trustworthy Standards Instrument (NEATS) as the scoring tool and assessed a randomly selected chapter from national clinical guidelines that were published or updated during the period 2013 to January 2022. NEATS has 15 domain items; three are assessed with the response alternatives Yes/No/Not known, and twelve are assessed on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where 1 corresponds to very low trustworthiness and 5 to very high trustworthiness. The assessments were made individually by two authors. Inter-rater reliability was assessed with exact or close reliability, and Cohen's kappa coefficient. We included 60 relevant guidelines. For nine of the twelve NEATS domain items assessed using the Likert scale, there was very low or low adherence to standards for trustworthy clinical guidelines (median score 1 or 2). The domain items with the lowest score (median score 1) were 'The study selection', 'Description of the studies and the results', 'Rating the strength of recommendations' and 'External review'. The domain item with the highest score was 'Specific and unambiguous articulation of recommendations' (median score 4). The majority of the national clinical guidelines had low adherence to the standards for trustworthy clinical guidelines assessed using the NEATS scoring tool.

Supplementation With Bifidobacterium and Symptomatic Control in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An Evidence-Based Review.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder, with a global prevalence of around 11%. Family doctors should be aware of the diagnosis and treatment of this pathology. The benefit of using probiotics is questionable. The purpose of this review is to establish the evidence of the association between Bifidobacterium supplementation and symptomatic control in patients with IBS. The research was conducted using the National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Electronic Library for Health of the British NHS, Canadian Medical Association Practice Guidelines InfoBase, Cochrane Library, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, Bandolier, Evidence-Based Medicine Online, and PubMed. Articles published between March 2017 and March 2022in humans and written in Portuguese, Spanish, and Englishusing the terms IBS and Bifidobacterium were included. To stratify the level of evidence (LOE), the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT), from the American Academy of Family Physicians, was used. Thirty-seven articles were found corresponding to the search terms, and a total of seven articles were selected. Three clinical trials and a simple review have demonstrated improvement in symptoms, although further studies are needed. The guideline and the systematic review did not demonstrate superiority in symptomatic relief when compared to other species of probiotics. The meta-analysis did not show the efficacy of the isolated use of Bifidobacterium.The evidence of an association between supplementation with Bifidobacterium and symptomatic control in patients with IBS is not clear. Some studies seem to demonstrate benefits in improving symptoms (SORT C).

DENTAL IMPLANT TREATMENT IN DIABETES MELLITUS (DM) PATIENTS: REVIEW

With the development of progressive views on dental restoration and replacement, the clinical approach to seemingly hopeless clinical situations has changed radically, and those patients who would previously be considered extremely difficult are effectively provided with dental care. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a global problem worldwide. The negative impact of the disease on bone metabolism raises some concerns about the long-term survival of dental implants in diabetic patients. Diabetes mellitus is one of the most significant somatic diseases that determine the protocol for managing dental patients and the long-term functioning of dental implantation. Protocols for the management of patients with diabetes mellitus have been developed. This article reviews the data of dental implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus. The following databases were included in a systematic search of the relevant literature: PubMed, Embase, AWMF Online, National Guidelines Clearinghouse, International Guidelines Network, and The Cochrane Library. The following search terms were used: dental implants and diabetes, diabetes and implant survival, whether diabetes is a risk factor for dental implants, peri-implantitis and diabetes. A total of 58 articles that met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review were included. The results of a systematic review showed that diabetes mellitus has an impact on implant survival rates compared with patients without diabetes.

Summary of the best evidence for the use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation technique in invasive mechanical ventilation patients

To search and evaluate the literatures on the application of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation technique (MI-E) in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation in China and abroad, and to summarize the best evidence to provide evidence-based basis for clinical practice. The literatures related to the use of MI-E technique in invasive mechanical ventilation patients were searched from the establishment of the database to April 1, 2022 in BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate Clinical Advisor, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO), medlive, Cochrane Library, Joana Briggs Instiute, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Website of American Association for Respiratory Care, including guideline, expert consensus, clinical decision, evidence summary, systematic review and randomized controlled trial. The JBI Center for Evidence-Based Health Care Expert Consensus Evaluation Criteria (2016) was used to evaluate the quality of the included systematic reviews; the JBI Center for Evidence-Based Health Care Evaluation Criteria for Randomized Controlled Trials was used to evaluate the quality of the included randomized controlled trial. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of literature, and extracted and summarized the evidence based on professional judgment. A total of 7 literatures were enrolled, including 3 systematic reviews and 4 randomized controlled trials. After quality evaluation, 7 articles were all enrolled. Thirteen best evidences were formed from four aspects of indications, contraindications, parameter settings, and attention. The study summarizes the best evidence for the application of MI-E technique in invasive mechanical ventilation patients. It is recommended that medical staff undergo professional training, combined with their professional judgment as well as the patient's clinical specific conditions and willingness, and accurately apply MI-E technology to invasive mechanical ventilation patients.

Alergia ao Látex em Contexto Ocupacional

Introduction/framework/objectives Latex allergy is recognized as a widespread health problem that assumed serious proportions in the 1990s. Although preventive measures have markedly decreased its incidence, recent studies have shown that it remains an important health problem in certain population groups, particularly in developing countries. This work aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current status of occupational latex allergies. We summarize various aspects of this condition, such as prevalence, risk groups, latex allergens, the diagnostic approach, prevention, and treatment. Methodology A bibliographic review was carried out in January 2023 in the following databases: PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Evidence-based Medicine, Canadian Medical Association, Practice Guidelines and National Guideline Clearinghouse. Content Repeated exposure to latex in an occupational context can lead to worker sensitivity, with a significant clinical and socio-economic impact. We summarize various aspects of this condition, such as prevalence, risk groups, latex allergens, the diagnostic approach, prevention and treatment. Discussion and Conclusions The history of latex allergies has demonstrated that potent allergens such as Natural Rubber Latex proteins can cause rapid immunoglobulin-E-mediated sensitization and clinical allergies, reaching serious proportions in highly exposed individuals. Occupational exposure has a decisive influence on the allergen sensitivity profile, with important clinical and therapeutic consequences. The effectiveness of secondary prevention measures is limited. Thus, it is essential to implement early primary prevention measures in individuals belonging to risk groups, to avoid or minimize exposure to latex allergens. KEYWORDS: Healthcare Professionals, Latex allergy, Latex gloves, Latex hypersensitivity, Natural rubber latex, Occupational diseases, Occupational health, Occupational Medicine.

Barriers and enablers to implementing clinical practice guidelines in primary care: an overview of systematic reviews

ObjectivesTo identify the barriers and enablers to implementing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommendations in primary care and to provide recommendations that could facilitate the uptake of CPGs recommendations.DesignAn overview of...

Review of the Screening Guidelines for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: How to Choose Wisely.

Currently, there is no international unanimity regarding the timings, the optimal cut-off points, and standardized methods of screening or diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The screening guidelines and recommendations for GDM evolved over time; concise information has been presented here in the review. We searched electronic databases for various guidelines for screening of GDM in PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Scopus, Guidelines International Network (GIN library), National Guidelines Clearinghouse (NGC); Web sites of relevant organizations; and trial registries. The mesh headings derived after reviewing the articles and were used to further search the articles are: ("Screening Guidelines GDM" or "Screening Criteria for GDM") and ("Glucose Intolerance in Pregnancy" or "Gestational Diabetes Mellitus"). The articles published from 1960 till December 2022 were included. Key outcomes included the prevalence of GDM is 14.6% according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria and 13.4% according to Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) criteria, making the DIPSI criterion a cost-effective method for low-resource settings. The IADPSG) criterion diagnoses and treats GDM earlier, thus reducing the complications associated with GDM in the mother and newborn. The IADPSG criteria at a cut-off of ≥140 mg/dL have a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 93%, whereas the World Health Organization (2013) criteria at the same cut-off has a lower sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 81%. The risk factors of having GDM are family history, history during past pregnancy, medical history, multiple current pregnancies, and raised hemoglobin A1c. The screening guidelines have been developed by different organizations and institutions over the years. The guidelines with the threshold values for screening and their standardization for detecting GDM in Indian mothers are yet to be established.

The efficacy of tolvaptan for heart failure in chronic kidney disease: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Approximately half of people with heart failure have chronic kidney disease (CKD). Tolvaptan is reported to be effective in treating heart failure. However, the safety and efficacy of its use in patients with CKD is uncertain. In this study, we conducted a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan on patients with heart failure and CKD. This study protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO and the registration number is CRD42022368148. The consent of this protocol report is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement guidelines. We will include randomized controlled trials related to tolvaptan in patients with heart failure and CKD. Two research members will electronically and independently search 4 English databases (EMBASE, PubMed, National Guideline Clearinghouse, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and 4 Chinese databases (Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and VIP Database) from their inception to November 2022. The risk of bias in each included study will be assessed utilizing the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. All statistical analyses will be conducted using the software program Review Manager version 5.3. The results of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. This review can provide convincing evidence to help clinicians make decisions when dealing with heart failure and CKD.

The efficacy and safety of Rhodiola formulation for the treatment of ischemic heart disease: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ischemic heart disease is the main cause of heart failure, which seriously endangers the health of people and puts a huge burden on health care resources all over the world. We propose the current protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Rhodiola on ischemic heart disease, providing a reference for clinical use. Two research members will electronically and independently search 4 English databases (EMBASE, PubMed, National Guideline Clearinghouse, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and 4 Chinese databases (Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and VIP Database) from their inception to October 2020. Quality assessment of the included randomized controlled trial was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. All calculations were carried out with Stata 11.0 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom). A synthesis of current evidence of Rhodiola formulation for ischemic heart disease will be provided in this protocol. This study will provide a theoretical basis for the clinical use of Rhodiola formulation for treating ischemic heart disease.

Evidence summary of early rehabilitation of adults with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

To evaluate and summarize the best evidence for early rehabilitation of adults with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Evidence on early rehabilitation of adult VV-ECMO patients was searched by computer from 7 English literature databases [PubMed database, cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature (CINAHL), Embase database, Cochrane library database, UpToDate clinical consultant, BMJ best clinical practice, JBI database], 5 Chinese literature databases (China biomedical literature database, China Yimai Tong, China national knowledge infrastructure, Wanfang data, VIP database), 5 guideline networks [National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Guidelines International Network (GIN), China Guide Network] and 2 professional association websites [Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine]. The search period is from January 2011 to December 2021. The appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation II (AGREE ) and JBI 2014 quality assessment tools were used to evaluate the quality of inclusion guidelines, systematic reviews, expert consensus and original studies, respectively, and to extract and summarize the best evidence for early rehabilitation of adults with VV-ECMO. A total of 2 guidelines, 2 expert consensuses, 2 systematic reviews and 8 original studies [including 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), 1 non-randomized controlled study, 3 cohort studies and 3 case reports] were included. The evidence was summarized from 9 aspects including the necessity of early rehabilitation, rehabilitation initiation time, rehabilitation location, pre-rehabilitation preparation, pre-rehabilitation assessment, rehabilitation method, rehabilitation frequency and duration, rehabilitation process monitoring and effect evaluation,and finally 24 pieces of the best evidence were summarized. Early rehabilitation of adults with VV-ECMO is safe and feasible. The summary of the best evidence can provide evidence-based guidance for clinical medical staff to reasonably carry out early rehabilitation.

311.9: Nurse-Involved Intervention Strategies for Medication Compliance in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review

Objective: To evaluate the intervention strategies for medication compliance of kidney transplantation recipients with nurses’ participation systematically, and to provide evidence-based evidence for nursing staff to formulate intervention strategies. Methods: BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate, Joanna Briggs Institute, The Cochrane Library, Guidelines International Network, Registered Nurses’Association of Ontario, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, PubMed, EmBase, Web of Science, CNKI, WangFang Data. Sinomed were searched to collect evidence of nurse-involved intervention strategies for medication compliance in kidney transplant recipients.The time limit for the retrieval is from the inception of databases until August 7, 2021. 2 researchers screened studies, extracted the data and evaluated the quality of included studies independently. Results: A total of 22 randomized controlled trials were included in this study.At present, the intervention strategies for medication compliance of kidney transplant recipients with nurses’ participation involving clinical pharmaceutical care, behavioral intervention, education, electronic monitoring and reminder, telemedically supported case management, cognitive behavioral therapy, mobile drug manager application, etc. Conclusion: Nursing staff should pay attention to the poor medication compliance of kidney transplant recipients, more participate in the formulation and implementation of intervention programs actively, and use existing evidence-based evidence to help kidney transplant recipients improve medication compliance. Caregivers could consider cognitive behavioral therapy, behavioral intervention and education intervention strategies, but there is insufficient evidence of existing nurse-involved intervention strategies for medication compliance of kidney transplantation patients, and the selection of the best intervention strategy is difficult and complex. High-quality, large-sample studies are still needed in the future. National Natural Science Foundation of China The Project Approval Number: 71904209.

Quality of Palliative Care Guidelines in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Quality Appraisal using AGREE II Instrument.

While the principles for developing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are well established, the quality of published guidelines is very diverse. The present study was conducted to evaluate the quality of existing CPGs in palliative care for heart failure patients. The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses. A systematic search was conducted in the Excerpta Medica Database, MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL databases and Guideline internet sites: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Guidelines International Network and National Health and Medical Research Council for CPGs published through April 2021. Criteria for including CPGs were: Containing palliative measures for patients with heart failure over 18 years old and preferably interprofessional guidelines that focus on only one dimension of palliative care or focus on diagnosis, definition and treatment were excluded from the study. After initial screening, five appraisers rated the quality of the final selection of CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, 2nd edition (AGREE II). From 1501 records, seven guidelines were selected for analysis. The 'scope and purpose' and 'clarity of presentation' domains obtained the highest mean and 'rigor of development' and 'applicability' domains obtained the lowest mean scores. Three categories of recommendations were: (1) Strongly recommended (guidelines 1, 3, 6 and 7); (2) recommended with modifications (guideline 2) and (3) not recommended (guidelines 4 and 5). Clinical guidelines for palliative care in patients with heart failure were of moderate-to-high quality, with the main deficiencies occurring in the rigor of development and applicability domains. The results inform clinicians and guideline developers of the strengths and weaknesses of each CPG. To improve the quality of palliative care CPGs in the future, it is recommended that developers pay detailed attention to all domains of the AGREE II criteria. Funding agent: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. (IR.MUI.NUREMA.REC.1400.123).

The Impact of Complementary and Integrative Medicine Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.

To examine the evidence levels, study characteristics, and outcomes of nonpharmacologic complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) interventions in rehabilitation for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). MEDLINE (OvidSP), PubMed (NLM), EMBASE ( Embase.com ), CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycINFO (OvidSP), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and National Guidelines Clearinghouse databases were evaluated using PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered in INPLASY (protocol registration: INPLASY202160071). Quantitative studies published between 1992 and 2020 investigating the efficacy of CIM for individuals with TBI of any severity, age, and outcome were included. Special diets, herbal and dietary supplements, and counseling/psychological interventions were excluded, as were studies with mixed samples if TBI data could not be extracted. A 2-level review comprised title/abstract screening, followed by full-text assessment by 2 independent reviewers. In total, 90 studies were included, with 57 001 patients in total. This total includes 2 retrospective studies with 17 475 and 37 045 patients. Of the 90 studies, 18 (20%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The remainder included 20 quasi-experimental studies (2-group or 1-group pre/posttreatment comparison), 9 retrospective studies, 1 single-subject study design, 2 mixed-methods designs, and 40 case study/case reports. Guided by the American Academy of Neurology evidence levels, class II criteria were met by 61% of the RCTs. Included studies examined biofeedback/neurofeedback (40%), acupuncture (22%), yoga/tai chi (11%), meditation/mindfulness/relaxation (11%), and chiropractic/osteopathic manipulation (11%). The clinical outcomes evaluated across studies included physical impairments (62%), mental health (49%), cognitive impairments (39%), pain (31%), and activities of daily living/quality of life (28%). Additional descriptive statistics were summarized using narrative synthesis. Of the studies included for analyses, 97% reported overall positive benefits of CIM. Rigorous and well experimentally designed studies (including RCTs) are needed to confirm the initial evidence supporting the use of CIM found in the existing literature.