National Clinical Trials Network Research Articles

Composite grading algorithm for National Cancer Institute’s PRO-CTCAE.

7018 Background: Standard reporting of symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in oncology relies on clinicians to rate patient (pt) experience using CTCAE; each symptom is represented by a single graded item. To capture direct pt experience, NCI developed PRO-CTCAE to supplement CTCAE. In PRO-CTCAE, the pt answers up to 3 questions per AE about a symptom’s frequency, severity and interference with daily activities. To align PRO-CTCAE with CTCAE, we developed an algorithm for mapping sets of questions for an AE to a single composite numerical grade. Methods: We used a 5-step process. (1) All 187 possible PRO-CTCAE score permutations were presented to clinical investigators to subjectively map permutations to single numerical grades (range 0-3). (2) Permutations with < 75% agreement were presented to investigator committees at a National Clinical Trials Network meeting to gain majority consensus via anonymous voting. (3) The resulting algorithm was refined via graphical and tabular approaches to assure directional consistency. (4) Validity, reliability and sensitivity were assessed in a national study dataset. (5) Accuracy for delineating AEs between study arms was measured in 2 phase III clinical trials (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology A091105 and Exelixis COMET-2). Results: (1) 12/187 score permutations had < 75% initial agreement. (2) Majority consensus was reached for all permutations. (3) 5 mappings were adjusted to assure directional consistency. (4) Composite grades for 46/59 (78%) AEs were higher in pts with ECOG performance status 2-4 vs 0-1 (median effect size 0.23 [range -0.49-0.73]; 32/59 effect size ≥0.2; 25/59 p< 0.05), similar to when conducting analysis on individual unmapped items. The test-retest reliability for 24 selected composite grades ranged from 0.57-0.96 (median intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.77) with 18/24 (75%) grades having ICC ≥0.7. Median (range) standardized response means in pts reporting worsening, no change, and improvement were 0.20 (0.03-0.34), -0.06 (-0.20-0.03) and -0.12 (-0.32-0.06). (5) Pattern, directionality and statistical significance of between-arm differences in both trials were preserved with composite grades as compared to individual unmapped items. Conclusions: A composite grading algorithm for PRO-CTCAE was rigorously developed and validated. PRO-CTCAE composite grades may be useful in analyses to provide a single metric for each pt-reported AE for trial and real-world reporting. Support: UG1CA189823; U01CA233046; HHSN261200800043C; Bayer (A091105); https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org .

Understanding Verbosity: Funding Source and the Length of Consent Forms for Cancer Clinical Trials.

Consent forms are an important educational tool that helps cancer patients decide on whether or not to enroll on a clinical trial, but wordiness potentially detracts from their educational value. This single-institution study examined word counts of consent forms for all phase I, II, and III solid tumor clinical trials between 2004 and 2010. Consent forms were categorized by trial funding source: (1) pharmaceutical company; (2) National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN); (3) R01- or other non-government grants; and (4) mixed (funding from multiple sources). Three hundred fifteen consent forms were studied; these included 106 (34%) pharmaceutical company; 145 (46%) NCTN; 44 (14%) R01 type; and 20 (6%) mixed. The overall median word count was 5129 words per consent form (interquartile range (IQR) range, 4226 to 6695). The median word counts per consent form (IQR) were 5648 (4814, 6803), 5243 (4139, 6932), 4365 (3806, 5124), and 4319 (3862, 5944), respectively, based on the above funding sources, showing that pharmaceutical company trial consent forms had the highest median word count. Of note, phase of trial was associated with consent form length (phase III were wordier), and consent forms manifested a consistent increase in wordiness over time. These observations underscore a timely need to find ways to limit the verbosity of consent forms, particularly in those from pharmaceutical company trials.

Representativeness of Black Patients in Cancer Clinical Trials Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Compared With Pharmaceutical Companies.

BackgroundMany clinical trials supporting new drug applications underrepresent minority patients. Trials conducted by the National Cancer Institute’s National Clinical Trial’s Network (NCTN) have greater outreach to community sites, potentially allowing better representation. We compared the representation of Black patients in pharmaceutical company–sponsored cancer clinical trials with NCTN trials and with the US cancer population.MethodsWe established a large cohort of study publications representing the results of trials that supported new US Food and Drug Administration drug approvals from 2008 to 2018. NCTN trial data were from the SWOG Cancer Research Network. US cancer population rates were estimated using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results survey data. We compared the proportion of Black patients by enrollment year for each cancer type and overall. Tests of proportions were used. All statistical tests were 2-sided.ResultsA total 358 trials (pharmaceutical company–sponsored trials, 85; SWOG trials, 273) comprised of 93 825 patients (pharmaceutical company–sponsored trials, 46 313; SWOG trials, 47 512) for 15 cancer types were analyzed. Overall, the proportion of Black patients was 2.9% for pharmaceutical company–sponsored trials, 9.0% for SWOG trials, and 12.1% for the US cancer population (P < .001 for each pairwise comparison). These findings were generally consistent across individual cancer types.ConclusionsThe poor representation of Black patients in pharmaceutical company–sponsored trials supporting new drug applications could result in the use of new drugs with little data about efficacy or side effects in this key population. Moreover, because pharmaceutical company–sponsored trials test the newest available therapies, limited access to these trials represents a disparity in access to potential breakthrough therapies.

Clinical Trials for the Surgical Oncologist: Opportunities and Hurdles.

Advancements in clinical practice usually require level one evidence from clinical trials that directly compare new approaches to standard of care. While clinical trials have provided data to guide advances in practices across surgical oncology, all too often accrual to clinical trials is slower than anticipated, and once results are presented and published, adoption in clinical practice is slow. Why and how can surgeons be successfully involved with clinical trials? An expert panel discusses the basic infrastructure of clinical trials, investigator-initiated trials, the National Clinical Trials Network, and opportunities for surgeon involvement. Two national clinical trials, NSABP B-51/RTOG 1304 and PROSPECT N1048, are discussed to highlight the role of the surgical oncologist.

Moving Forward in Cervical Cancer: Enhancing Susceptibility to DNA Repair Inhibition and Damage, an NCI Clinical Trials Planning Meeting Report.

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide, and prognosis is poor for those who experience recurrence or develop metastatic disease, in part due to the lack of active therapeutic directions. The National Cancer Institute convened a Cervical Cancer Clinical Trials Planning Meeting in October 2018 to facilitate the design of hypothesis-driven clinical trials focusing on locally advanced, metastatic, and recurrent cervical cancer around the theme of enhancing susceptibility to DNA repair inhibition and DNA damage. Before the meeting, a group of experts in the field summarized available preclinical and clinical data to identify potentially active inducers and inhibitors of DNA. The goals of the Clinical Trials Planning Meeting focused on identification of novel experimental strategies capitalizing on DNA damage and repair (DDR) regulators and cell cycle aberrations, optimization of radiotherapy as a DDR agent, and design of clinical trials incorporating DDR regulation into the primary and recurrent or metastatic therapies for cervical carcinoma. Meeting deliverables were novel clinical trial concepts to move into the National Clinical Trials Network. This report provides an overview for the rationale of this meeting and the state of the science related to DDR regulation in cervical cancer.

PROSPER: Phase III randomized study comparing perioperative nivolumab versus observation in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergoing nephrectomy (ECOG-ACRIN EA8143).

TPS765 Background: There is no standard adjuvant systemic therapy that increases overall survival (OS) over surgery alone for non-metastatic RCC. Anti-PD-1 nivolumab (nivo) improves OS in metastatic RCC and is well tolerated. In mouse models, priming the immune system prior to surgery with anti-PD-1 results in superior OS compared to adjuvant dosing. Remarkable pathologic responses have been seen with neoadjuvant PD-1 in multiple ph 2 studies in bladder, lung and breast cancers. Phase 2 neoadjuvant RCC trials of nivo show preliminary feasibility and safety with no surgical delays. PROSPER RCC seeks to improve clinical outcomes by priming the immune system with neoadjuvant nivo prior to nephrectomy followed by continued immune system engagement with adjuvant blockade in patients (pts) with high risk RCC compared to standard of care surgery alone. Methods: This global, unblinded, phase 3 National Clinical Trials Network study is accruing pts with clinical stage ≥T2 or TanyN+ RCC of any histology planned for radical or partial nephrectomy. Select oligometastatic disease is permitted if the pt can be rendered ‘no evidence of disease’ within 12 weeks of nephrectomy (≤3 metastases; no brain, bone or liver). In the investigational arm, nivo is administered 480mg IV q4 weeks with 1 dose prior to surgery followed by 9 adjuvant doses. The control arm is nephrectomy followed by standard of care surveillance. There is no placebo. Baseline tumor biopsy is required only in the nivo arm but encouraged in both. Randomized pts are stratified by clinical T stage, node positivity, and M stage. 805 pts provide 84.2% power to detect a 14.4% absolute benefit in recurrence-free survival at 5 years assuming the ASSURE historical control of ~56% to 70% (HR = 0.70). The study is powered to evaluate a significant increase in OS (HR 0.67). Critical perioperative therapy considerations such as safety, feasibility, and quality of life metrics are integrated. PROSPER RCC embeds a wealth of translational studies to examine the contribution of the baseline immune milieu and neoadjuvant priming with anti-PD-1 on clinical outcomes. As of October 18, 2019, 317 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03055013.

Investigation of Target Minimum and Maximum Dosimetric Criteria for the Evaluation of Standardized Radiotherapy Plan &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;—Target Minimum and Maximum Evaluation

Purpose: Standardization of tumor dosimetric coverage is essential for the evaluation of radiotherapy treatment plan quality. National clinical trials network RTOG protocols include tumor target dosimetric criteria that specify the prescription dose and minimum and maximum dose (Dmin and Dmax) coverages. This study investigated the impact of various minimum and maximum dose definitions using tumor control probability (TCP) models. Methods and Materials: Three disease sites (head and neck, lung, and prostate) were studied using target volume dosimetric criteria from the RTOG 0920, 1308, and 0938 protocols. Simulated target dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of Dmin and Dmax were modeled using the protocol specifications. Published TCP models for the three disease sites were applied to the DVH curves. The effects of various dose definitions on TCP were studied. Results: While the prescription dose coverage was maintained, a -3.7% TCP difference was observed for head and neck cancer when the target doses varied by 3.5% of the tumor volume from the point dose. For prostate and lung cancers, -3.3% and -2.2% TCP differences were observed, respectively. The TCPs for head and neck and prostate cancers were more negatively affected by deviations in the Dmin than the TCP for lung cancer. The lung TCP increased to a greater extent with a change in the Dmax compared with the head and neck and prostate TCPs. Conclusions: These results can be used to evaluate plan quality when the target dose only slightly deviates from the dosimetric criteria. When the overall target prescription dose coverage is maintained, the Dmax is recommended to be within 3% of the target volume: 98% (for head and neck and prostate) and 97% (for lung) of the target volume, satisfying the Dmin needed to maintain TCP variations at less than 2.1%. Using 0.03 cc instead of a point dose for Dmin and Dmax criteria minimally impacts TCPs.

Abstract A079: National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH): A successful precision medicine signal-seeking trial in patients (pts) with rare variants and refractory malignancies

Abstract Introduction: NCI-MATCH, developed by ECOG-ACRIN &amp; NCI, is the largest precision medicine study for pts with refractory malignancy. Over 1100 clinical sites in the National Clinical Trials Network enrolled pts. The purpose of the study is to identify potentially beneficial targeted treatments across tumor types with similar molecular abnormalities. Methods: The NCI Central IRB approved NCI-MATCH. Pts with refractory/no treatment available solid tumors, lymphomas or myelomas had a fresh biopsy profiled by next generation sequencing (143 genes, &amp;gt; 4000 single nucleotide variants, indels, amplifications &amp; targeted fusions). Pts are assigned by a defined algorithm to treatments with evidence of activity against tumors with the relevant molecular alteration. Pts are excluded if a treatment is FDA approved or known to be ineffective for their malignancy. After successfully sequencing fresh biopsies from 5540 pts, subprotocols with extremely rare variants lacked sufficient accrual. To address actionable variants with a prevalence of &amp;lt; 1.5%, we decided to accept clinical sequencing results from 30 commercial and academic laboratories vetted by NCI-MATCH to address relevant variants. These labs notify clinicians participating in NCI-MATCH if their pt’s tumor contains an actionable variant. Treatment continues until tumors became refractory, pt intolerance or withdrawal of consent. An objective response rate (ORR by RECIST) of &amp;gt; 16% among 31 eligible patients is considered a positive signal. Results: After screening 5540 pts, 37.6% had an actionable variant. After histology and treatment-specific exclusions, 17.8% were assigned and 69.5% enrolled on the assigned subprotocol. 11 of the initial 30 subprotocols reached completion with adequate follow-up. Of the first 11 evaluable subprotocols, 3 addressing rare variants had a positive signal: Nivolumab in pts with loss of expression of MLH1 or MSH2 (ORR 36%), capivasertib in pts with AKT mutations (ORR 23%), and dabrafenib + trametinib in pts with BRAF V600 mutations (ORR 33%). These molecular variants were found in 2%, 1.2% and 1.9% respectively, of screened pts. Two other subprotcocols (afatinib in ERBB2 mutations and AZD4547 in FGFR abnormalities) showed responses in rare tumors or specific variant subsets, respectively. As of July 15, 2019, an additional 378 of 432 (88%) pts have been assigned to a treatment with a clinical sequencing assay; 83% of these pts enrolled to 1 of 24 subprotocols, allowing completion of an additional 9 of the original 30 subprotocols and complete accrual to 2 of 5 recently added subprotocols. Four of 35 subprotocols closed for lack of accrual, 10 continue accruing and 4 are planned. Conclusions: Platform precision medicine trials can identify potentially useful targeted treatments for diverse malignancies in pts with uncommon tumors &amp; rare actionable variants, an unmet need. In a population of pts with refractory cancers, lymphomas and myelomas, 30-40% will have an actionable variant for targeted treatment (investigational or standard). Of the first 11 subprotocols with adequate follow-up, 3 (27%) showed a positive signal and an additional 2 showed responses in rare tumors or in a molecular subset, suggesting that the NCI-MATCH trial approach identifies useful targets for further exploration. Citation Format: Lyndsay N Harris, Robert J Gray, Barbara A Conley, Alice P Chen, Keith T Flaherty, Stanley R Hamilton, Paul M Williams, Chris Karlovich, David Patton, Shuli Li, Lisa M McShane, Larry V Rubinstein, Edith P Mitchell, James V Tricoli, Richard F Little, Carlos L Arteaga, Peter J O'Dwyer, NCI-MATCH team. National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH): A successful precision medicine signal-seeking trial in patients (pts) with rare variants and refractory malignancies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A079. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-A079

Transforming the Early Drug Development Paradigm at the National Cancer Institute: The Formation of NCI's Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN).

Early drug development for cancer requires broad collaboration and skilled clinical investigators to enable enrollment of patients whose tumors have defined molecular profiles. To respond to these challenges, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) transformed its 60-year-old early-phase drug development program in 2014 into the Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN). The ETCTN is a consolidated, national network of 40+ academic institutions responsible for conducting more than 100 early-phase clinical trials. It promotes team science coordinated among basic, translational, and clinical investigators, emphasizing the inclusion of early career trialists. This perspective provides a brief overview of the ETCTN, summarizes its successes and challenges over its first grant funding cycle, and discusses the program's future directions. Measures indicated strong connectivity across the institutions, significant increases in investigator approval of the ETCTN scientific portfolio from years 1 to 4, and substantial research activity over 5 years, with 334 letters of intent submitted, 102 trials activated, and 3,570 patients accrued. The ETCTN's successful adoption relied heavily on the inclusion of senior investigators who have long-standing interactions with the NCI and a willingness to participate in a team science approach and to mentor early career investigators. In addition, NCI invested substantial resources in a centralized infrastructure to conduct trials and to support the inclusion of biomarkers in its studies. The ETCTN provides evidence that a collaborative national clinical trial network for early drug development is feasible and can address the demands of precision medicine approaches to oncologic clinical trials.

Abstract A089: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cohort of the NCI MATCH clinical trial (EAY131)

Abstract Background: Over the last 30 years, adolescent and young adult (AYA, 15-39 years of age) patients (pts) with cancer have experienced smaller improvements in 5-year survival compared to younger and older pts. One reason is their historically lower rate of participation in clinical trials (~3% AYA vs. 10% in pts &amp;gt; 40 years of age in adult cancer centers). A histology-agnostic trial provides greater opportunity for the AYA population and may improve accrual. The National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH; NCT0246506), a phase II precision medicine trial evaluating targeted therapy in adult pts (3 18 years old) based on molecular abnormalities in a tumor-agnostic fashion, has been open since 2015. Jointly developed and coordinated by NCI and ECOG-ACRIN and open through the NCI National Clinical Trials Network and the NCI Community Oncology Research Program at more than 1100 academic and community sites, this trial screened 6801 pts for 39 independently-accruing targeted treatment subprotocols. We reviewed the AYA data from the NCI-MATCH trial, which, due to eligibility criteria, does not include pts age 15-17. Materials and Methods: AYA pts age 18-39 with treatment-refractory malignancies (solid tumor, lymphoma, or myeloma) who were (a) eligible for a screening biopsy on the NCI-MATCH trial (screening cohort [SC]) or (b) had an actionable mutation previously identified through clinically indicated sequencing at a CLIA-approved and NCI-MATCH–accepted laboratory (outside assay cohort [OAC]) were eligible for MATCH AYA analysis. Results: Of the 6801 pts screened for NCI-MATCH, 373 were AYA pts age 18-39 (5.5%). Within the SC, 93.5% (300/321) of AYA pts were successfully biopsied, vs. 92.9% of those age 40+ (5240/5640); 35.7% of the SC AYA vs. 39.6% of the 40+ pts had a study-eligible actionable mutation, and 17% (51/300) of AYA pts vs. 17.8% (934/5240) of those 40+ were subsequently assigned to treatment. Of the 401 pts in the OAC, 30 (7.1%) were AYA; 24/30 (80.0%) of AYA OAC pts were assigned to treatment vs. 87.6% (332/379) of OAC pts age 40+. Screening enrollment data show that at Lead Academic Participating Sites (LAPS), a higher percentage of AYA pts were enrolled compared to pts age 40+ (32.8% [113/344] vs. 24.3% [1472/6047], respectively). In contrast, at NCORP sites, a higher percentage of 40+ pts was enrolled relative to AYA pts (43.8% [2647/6047] vs. 35.8% [123/344], respectively). Among the top histologies enrolled (aside from colon, breast, ovarian) were soft tissue sarcoma other than rhabdomyosarcoma, primary CNS tumors, and liver and hepatobiliary, cervical, and neuroendocrine cancers. Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences between AYA and older (40+) pts in the number who underwent successful biopsies, the prevalence of tumor actionable mutations, or the number of pts assigned to or who received study treatment. AYA pts were more likely to have been enrolled at a LAPS than a NCORP site, consistent with the AYA population being referred to LAPS upon progression from first-line treatment. Enrollment of the AYA in adult cancer centers in the NCI-MATCH trial was higher than the historical 3%: 5.5% in the SC and 7.1% in the OAC. As more tissue-agnostic studies become available in nationwide trials, AYA participation in clinical trials may increase. Citation Format: Alice P Chen, Shuli Li, Brent Coffey, James V Tricoli, Stanley R Hamilton, Mickey P Williams, Edith P Mitchell, David Patton, Robert J Gray, Lisa M McShane, Lawrence V Rubinstein, Carlos L Arteaga, Peter J O'Dwyer, Lyndsay N Harris, Barbara A Conley, Keith T Flaherty. Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cohort of the NCI MATCH clinical trial (EAY131) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A089. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-A089

PET-Directed Therapy for Patients with Limited-Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma - Results of Intergroup Nctn Study S1001

PET-Directed Therapy for Patients with Limited-Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma - Results of Intergroup Nctn Study S1001

Alliance A041702: A Randomized Phase III Study of Ibrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab Versus Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax and Obinutuzumab in Untreated Older Patients (≥ 70 Years of Age) with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Alliance A041702: A Randomized Phase III Study of Ibrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab Versus Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax and Obinutuzumab in Untreated Older Patients (≥ 70 Years of Age) with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Meeting Proceedings of the “Phase I: Where Science Becomes Medicine” Conference, Manchester, UK

Meeting Proceedings of the “Phase I: Where Science Becomes Medicine” Conference, Manchester, UK

Geriatric assessment among older adults receiving intensive therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: Report of CALGB 361006 (Alliance)

ObjectiveTo demonstrate feasibility of performing geriatric assessment (GA) in the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) and to explore the utility of GA to characterize treatment tolerance. Materials and methodsWe conducted a multisite companion study (CALGB 361006) to CALGB 11001, a phase 2 trial of adults ≥60 years old with newly diagnosed FLT3- mutated AML, testing the efficacy of adding sorafenib to intensive chemotherapy. On 361006, a GA was administered prior to induction and prior to post-remission therapy. The GA is divided into items requiring administration by a health care professional (HCP) and patient self-administered questionnaires. Feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate, time to GA completion, difficulty with GA administration, percent of patients requiring assistance, and satisfaction. Change in GA measures pre- and post-induction were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar's tests. ResultsThe recruitment rate was 80% (N = 43, median age 68 years). Median completion time of the GA was 30 min; (10 and 21 min for HCP and patients, respectively). HCP reported no difficulty completing assessments (100%). Most patients completed questionnaires without assistance (77%), and were satisfied with the length (89%). Self-reported physical function, mental health, social activity and nutritional parameters worsened after induction. ConclusionGA is feasible to administer in the setting of intensive induction for older adults with AML in the NCTN and provides evidence of the impact of induction therapy on physical and emotional health.

Diabetes and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: CALGB 80405 (Alliance).

BackgroundDiabetes is a prognostic factor for some malignancies, but its association with outcome in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is less clear.MethodsThis cohort study was nested within a randomized trial of first-line chemotherapy and bevacizumab and/or cetuximab for advanced or metastatic CRC. Patients were enrolled at 508 community and academic centers throughout the National Clinical Trials Network. The primary exposure was physician-documented diabetes at the time of enrollment. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. Tests of statistical significance were two-sided.ResultsAmong 2326 patients, 378 (16.3%) had diabetes. The median follow-up time was 6.0 years. We observed 1973 OS events and 2173 PFS events. The median time to an OS event was 22.7 months among those with diabetes and 27.1 months among those without diabetes (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.44; P < .001). The median time to a PFS event was 9.7 months among those with diabetes and 10.8 months among those without diabetes (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.30; P = .02). Patients with diabetes were more likely to experience no less than grade 3 hypertension (8.1% vs 4.4%; P = .054) but were not more likely to experience other adverse events, including neuropathy.ConclusionsDiabetes is associated with an increased risk of mortality and tumor progression in patients with advanced or metastatic CRC. Patients with diabetes tolerate first-line treatment with chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies similarly to patients without diabetes.

Toward Improving Practices for Submission of Diagnostic Tissue Blocks for National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials.

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) National Clinical Trials Network performs phase II and III clinical trials, which increasingly rely on the submission of diagnostic formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks for biomarker assessment. Simultaneously, advances in precision oncology require that clinical centers maintain diagnostic specimens for ancillary, standard-of-care diagnostics. This has caused tissue blocks to become a limited resource for advancing the NCI clinical trial enterprise and the practice of modern molecular pathology. The NCI convened a 1-day workshop of multidisciplined experts to discuss barriers and strategic solutions to facilitate diagnostic block submission for clinical trial science, from the perspective of patient advocates, legal experts, pathologists, and clinical oncologists. The expert views and opinions were carefully noted and reported. Recommendations were proposed to reduce institutional barriers and to assist organizations in developing clear policies regarding diagnostic block submission for clinical trials.

P1.01-12 Trends in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Sponsored Lung Cancer Clinical Trials Pre and Post NCI’s National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN)

P1.01-12 Trends in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Sponsored Lung Cancer Clinical Trials Pre and Post NCI’s National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN)

Factors Associated With Successful Discontinuation of Immune Suppression After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Immune suppression discontinuation is routinely attempted after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and under current practices may lead to graft-vs-host disease (GVHD)-associated morbidity and death. However, the likelihood and predictive factors associated with successful immune suppression discontinuation after HCT are poorly understood. To examine factors associated with successful immune suppression discontinuation and risk for immune suppression discontinuation failure under conventional HCT approaches and develop a practical tool to estimate successful immune suppression discontinuation likelihood at the clinical point of care. Using long-term follow-up data from 2 national Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trial Network studies (N = 827), a multistate model was developed to investigate the probability and variables associated with immune suppression discontinuation success. The study began in July 2015, and analyses were completed in August 2019. Immune suppression discontinuation and immune suppression discontinuation failure. Of the 827 patients included in the analysis, 456 were men (55.1%). Median age at transplant was 44 (range, <1-67) years. With median follow-up of 72 (range, 11-124) months, 20.0% of the patients were alive and not receiving immune suppression at 5 years. Older recipient age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] of >50 vs <30 years, 0.27, 99% CI, 0.14-0.50; P < .001), mismatched unrelated donor (aOR, mismatched unrelated vs matched related, 0.37; 99% CI, 0.14-0.97; P = .008), peripheral blood graft (aOR of peripheral blood graft vs bone marrow, 0.46; 99% CI, 0.26-0.82; P < .001), and advanced stage disease (aOR of advanced vs early disease, 0.45; 99% CI, 0.23-0.86, P = 0.002), were significantly associated with decreased odds of immune suppression discontinuation. Failed attempts at immune suppression discontinuation (127 patients [37.1% of total immune suppression discontinuation events]) resulting in GVHD were significantly associated with use of peripheral blood stem cells (HR, 2.62; 99% CI, 1.30-5.29; P < .001), prior GVHD, and earlier immune suppression discontinuation attempts. Earlier immune suppression discontinuation was not associated with protection from cancer relapse after HCT (adjusted hazard ratio for discontinuation vs not, 1.95; 99% CI, 0.88-4.31; P = .03).Dynamic prediction models were developed to provide future immune suppression discontinuation probability according to individual patient characteristics. Successful immune suppression discontinuation is uncommon in the setting of peripheral blood stem cell grafts. The data suggest earlier attempts at ISD conferred no long-term benefit, given frequent ISD failure, limited subsequent success after initial failed ISD attempt, and no evidence of relapse reduction. Using a risk model-based clinical application, physicians may be able to identify individual patients' probability of successful immune suppression discontinuation.

Validation and optimization of aweb-based nomogram for predicting survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

To optimize and validate acurrent (NRG [anewly constituted National Clinical Trials Network group through National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project [NSABP], the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] and the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)]) nomogram for glioblastoma patients as part of continuous validation. We identified patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma who were treated with temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy between 2006 and 2016 at three large-volume hospitals. The extent of resection was determined via postoperative MRI. The discrimination and calibration abilities of the prediction algorithm were assessed; if additional factors were identified as independent prognostic factors, updated models were developed using the data from two hospitals and were externally validated using the third hospital. Models were internally validated using cross-validation and bootstrapping. A total of 837 patients met the eligibility criteria. The median overall survival (OS) was 20.0 (95% CI 18.5-21.5) months. The original nomogram was able to estimate the 6‑, 12-, and 24-month OS probabilities, but it slightly underestimated the OS values. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, MRI-defined total resection had agreater impact on OS than that shown by the original nomogram, and two additional factors-IDH1mutation and tumor contacting subventricular zone-were newly identified as independent prognostic values. An updated nomogram incorporating these new variables outperformed the original nomogram (C-index at 6, 12, 24, and 36months: 0.728, 0.688, 0.688, and 0.685, respectively) and was well calibrated. External validation using an independent cohort showed C‑indices of 0.787, 0.751, 0.719, and 0.702 at 6, 12, 24, and 36months, respectively, and was well calibrated. An updated and validated nomogram incorporating the contemporary parameters can estimate individual survival outcomes in patients with glioblastoma with better accuracy.

SWOG S1505: Initial findings on eligibility and neoadjuvant chemotherapy experience with mFOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

4137 Background: Clinical outcomes after curative therapy of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) remain suboptimal. For early control of systemic disease with aggressive perioperative chemotherapy (CTx), we conducted a prospective trial in the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) setting. Methods: S1505 was a randomized phase II trial of periop (12 weeks pre-, 12 weeks post-op) CTx with either mFOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin – without bolus 5-FU and leucovorin; Arm 1), or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (Arm 2). Eligibility required adult patients with ECOG PS 0 or 1, confirmed tissue diagnosis of PDA, and resectable disease: no involvement of the celiac, common hepatic, or superior mesenteric arteries (and, if present, variants); &lt; 180° interface between tumor and vessel wall, of the portal or superior mesenteric veins; patent portal vein/splenic vein confluence; no metastases. Primary outcome is 2-year overall survival (OS), using a “pick the winner” design; for 100 eligible patients, accrual up to 150 patients was planned, to account for cases deemed ineligible at central radiology review. Results: From 2015 to 2018, 147 patients were enrolled; 74 to Arm 1; 73 to Arm 2. At central radiology review, 42/147 (29%) were ineligible; of these, 15 (36%) had venous involvement ≥180°, 22 (52%) had arterial involvement, 28 (67%) had distant disease. One patient had distal cholangiocarcinoma (ineligible); one withdrew consent after randomization. Eligible patients (n = 103) had median age 64 years; males 58%; whites 89%; PS 0 64%. Of 103, 99 (96%) started and 86 (83%) completed preop CTx. There was one death due to sepsis and 61 additional patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicities. To date, 76 of 99 (77%) patients went to surgery and 72 (73%) underwent resection. Conclusions: This is the first-ever NCTN study of periop CTx for resectable PDA. Accrual was brisk, establishing feasibility. Ineligible cases after central radiology review highlight quality control and physician education imperatives for neoadjuvant PDA trials. Preop CTx safety and resection rates are encouraging. Follow up for OS is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02562716.