Nasal Polyp Score Research Articles

Rapid and sustained effects of dupilumab in severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Rapid and sustained effects of dupilumab in severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Outcomes of dupilumab treatment versus endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Outside of SINUS-24 (A Controlled Clinical Study of Dupilumab in Patients With Bilateral Nasal Polyps) and SINUS-52 (Controlled Clinical Study of Dupilumab in Patients With Nasal Polyps), there are limited data on the efficacy of dupilumab in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The objective was to compare dupilumab with functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) in patients with CRSwNP by assessing the change in nasal polyp and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores postintervention. A retrospective matched cohort study compared 54 patients who had CRSwNP treated with dupilumab with 54 patients who had CRSwNP treated with FESS; both cohorts were treated with topical corticosteroids. The primary end points were change in nasal polyp score and overall SNOT-22 score. Secondary end points were change in SNOT-22 domain scores and SNOT-22 olfaction score. Patients who underwent FESS had a greater improvement in nasal polyp score (5.18±2.01) compared with patients treated with dupilumab (4.27±1.98, p=0.02). There was no significant difference in terms of the change in overall SNOT-22 score. Patients treated with dupilumab had greater improvement in the extranasal rhinologic SNOT-22 domain scores (4.87±3.91) compared with patients treated with FESS (2.93±4.32, p=0.02). There was a greater improvement in the SNOT-22 olfaction scores for patients treated with dupilumab (2.35±2.17) compared with patients treated with FESS (1.48±2.24, p=0.04). Patients taking dupilumab were followed on average for 12.20months and patients treated with FESS were followed for 17.90months. Overall, both therapies are effective at reducing symptoms in patients with CRSwNP according to SNOT-22. Patients treated with dupilumab reported improved olfaction and decreased cough, postnasal drainage, and thick nasal drainage as compared with patients treated with FESS, while patients treated with FESS had a greater reduction in polyp burden.

Mepolizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: Treatment efficacy by comorbidity and blood eosinophil count

In the phase III SYNAPSE study, mepolizumab reduced nasal polyp (NP) size and nasal obstruction in chronic rhinosinusitis with NP. We sought to assess the efficacy of mepolizumab in patients from SYNAPSE grouped by comorbid asthma, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), and baseline blood eosinophil count (BEC). SYNAPSE, a randomized, double-blind, 52-week study (NCT03085797), included patients with severe bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis with NP eligible for surgery despite intranasal corticosteroid treatment. Patients received 4-weekly subcutaneous mepolizumab 100 mg or placebo plus standard of care for 52 weeks. Coprimary end points were change in total endoscopic NP score (week 52) and nasal obstruction visual analog scale score (weeks 49-52). Subgroup analyses by comorbid asthma and AERD status, and post hoc by BEC, were exploratory. Analyses included 407 patients (289 with asthma; 108with AERD; 371 and 278 with BEC counts ≥150 or ≥300 cells/μL, respectively). The proportion of patients with greater than or equal to 1-point improvement from baseline in NP score was higher with mepolizumab versus placebo across comorbid diseases (asthma: 52.9% vs 29.5%; AERD: 51.1% vs 20.6%) and baseline BEC subgroups (<150 cells/μL: 55.0% vs 31.3%; ≥150 cells/μL: 49.5% vs 28.1%; <300 cells/μL: 50.7% vs 29.0%; ≥300 cells/μL: 50.4% vs 28.1%). Asimilar trend was observed in patients without comorbid asthma or AERD. More patients had more than 3-point improvement in nasal obstruction VAS score with mepolizumab versus placebo across comorbid subgroups. Mepolizumab reduced polyp size and nasal obstruction in chronic rhinosinusitis with NP regardless of the presence of comorbid asthma or AERD.

Interpretation of Clinical Efficacy of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps via Understanding the Local and Systemic Pathomechanisms.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous disease treated with medication or surgery. For recalcitrant type 2 CRSwNP, biological agents have been effectively used to improve nasal polyp score, nasal congestion score, daily symptoms related to CRSwNP, and time to systemic corticosteroid use or revision surgery. Although general guidelines for using biologics to treat CRSwNP were proposed by the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps in 2020 and various studies have tested their efficacy, there is much more to learn about biologics—specific indication and choice of biologics based on the endotypes, for instance. Understanding the vascular distribution of monoclonal antibodies and the differences in the vascularity of the non-polyp mucosa and nasal polyp tissue will not only aid understanding of each biologic’s clinical effect but also provide insights to establishing a more personalized approach to treating recalcitrant CRSwNP with biologics.

Estimating Clinically Meaningful Change of Efficacy Outcomes in Inadequately Controlled Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis.

Objectives/HypothesisClinical trials of biologics to treat chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) have evaluated objective outcomes (e.g., University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test [UPSIT], nasal polyps score [NPS], and computed tomography Lund‐Mackay score [CT‐LMK]) and patient‐reported symptoms (e.g., nasal congestion/obstruction [NC], loss of smell [LoS], and total symptom score [TSS]). We estimated anchor‐based thresholds for clinically meaningful change in objective and patient‐reported outcomes in patients with CRSwNP using data from LIBERTY NP SINUS‐24 and SINUS‐52 trials (NCT02912468; NCT02898454).MethodsTarget patient‐reported outcomes were NC, LoS, and TSS; target objective outcomes were UPSIT, NPS, and CT‐LMK. Anchor measures were the 22‐item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT‐22) rhinologic symptoms domain and total score and rhinosinusitis visual analog scale (VAS). The appropriateness of each anchor measure was evaluated by reviewing correlations between change in anchor measures and target outcomes and descriptive scores on target outcomes by levels of change in the anchor measure. Established thresholds for anchor measures (3.8 points for SNOT‐22 rhinologic symptoms, 8.9 points for SNOT‐22 total, 1‐category improvement for rhinosinusitis VAS) were used to estimate clinically meaningful score changes for each target outcome.ResultsBased on correlations between change in anchor measures and target outcomes, SNOT‐22 rhinologic symptoms domain was deemed the most appropriate anchor measure. Using this anchor measure, thresholds for clinically meaningful within‐patient change were NC: 1 point; LoS: 1 point; TSS: 3 points; UPSIT: 8 points; NPS: 1 point; and CT‐LMK: 5 points.ConclusionThese thresholds support interpretation of efficacy results for target outcomes in CRSwNP trials.Level of Evidence2 Laryngoscope, 132:265–271, 2022

Dupilumab in CRSwNP: Responder Analysis Using Clinically Meaningful Efficacy Outcome Thresholds.

Objectives/HypothesisDupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared interleukin (IL)‐4/IL‐13 receptor component, significantly improved outcomes for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in the SINUS‐24 and SINUS‐52 studies. This post hoc analysis evaluated dupilumab's effect on patient‐reported symptoms and objective outcome measures using thresholds of clinically meaningful within‐patient change from baseline.MethodsPatients with CRSwNP receiving subcutaneous dupilumab or placebo every 2 weeks in SINUS‐24/SINUS‐52 were analyzed. Patients recorded severity of nasal congestion (NC), loss of smell (LoS), and anterior/posterior rhinorrhea (each within range 0–3) daily. Total Symptom Score (TSS) was calculated as a composite severity score (0–9) for these symptoms. Objective measures included University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT; 0–40), nasal polyps score (NPS; 0–8), and Lund–Mackay computed tomography score (LMK‐CT; 0–24). Thresholds of within‐patient change in scores from baseline at weeks 24 and 52 considered clinically meaningful were ≥1.0 (NC, LoS), ≥3.0 (TSS), ≥8.0 (UPSIT), ≥1.0 (NPS), and ≥5.0 (LMK‐CT).ResultsA total of 724 and 303 patients were included in the week 24 and 52 analyses, respectively. Responder rates were significantly higher with dupilumab versus placebo at week 24 for NC (64% vs. 24%), LoS (63% vs. 14%), TSS (62% vs. 15%), UPSIT (54% vs. 6%), NPS (63% vs. 14%), and LMK‐CT (59% vs. 3%); all P < .0001. Results were consistent at week 52.ConclusionSignificantly greater proportions of dupilumab‐treated patients with CRSwNP compared with placebo demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in patient‐reported sinonasal symptoms and objective outcomes.Level of Evidence2 Laryngoscope, 132:259–264, 2022

Omalizumab-Induced Aspirin Tolerance in Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug–Exacerbated Respiratory Disease Patients Is Independent of Atopic Sensitization

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) comprises the triad of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, and intolerance to inhibitors of the cyclooxygenase-1 enzyme. The impact of omalizumab on prevention of aspirin-induced hypersensitivity in N-ERD patients with and without atopic sensitization has not been thoroughly addressed. To investigate the effect of omalizumab treatment on aspirin tolerance in atopic and nonatopic N-ERD patients. This single-center, prospective trial evaluated overall omalizumab-induced aspirin tolerability in N-ERD patients by performing aspirin challenge testing before and after 6 months of anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) therapy. The impact of omalizumab on CRSwNP asthma as well as serum and tissue biomarkers in patients with and without comorbid atopic sensitizations was further analyzed. Out of 33 patients included in the study, 56% developed complete aspirin tolerance and 18% tolerated higher dosages after 24 weeks. Polyp size and disease-specific symptoms (nasal polyp score [NPS] -1.9 ± 0.3, P < .001; Sino-Nasal Outcome Test [SNOT]-20 -16.7 ± 3.7, P < .001; Asthma Control Test [ACT] 3.2 ± 0.7, P < .001) improved in all patients irrespective of atopic sensitization. Effectiveness of omalizumab was accompanied by an increase in mean total serum IgE (307.8 ± 42 kU/L; P < .001) and a decrease in eosinophilic cationic protein (-10.6 ± 6.7 μg/L) and in relative eosinophilia (-2.5 ± 0.7%; P < .01). Whereas there was a significant reduction of tissue IgE (P < .05) in all patients after 4 weeks, the number of local eosinophils decreased only in atopic individuals (P < .05). Omalizumab induced complete aspirin tolerance in the majority of patients (56%) independent of atopic sensitization and demonstrated clinical efficacy in the treatment of CRSwNP and asthma. Inhibition of IgE can therefore be a promising treatment option in preventing NSAID hypersensitivity reactions in N-ERD patients.

Short-term efficacy of anti-IgE monoclonal antibody in patients with recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps combined with asthma

Objective: To investigate the short-term efficacy of anti-IgE monoclonal antibody (Omalizumab) in the treatment of recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) complicated with asthma. Methods: Patients with recurrent CRSwNP and comorbid asthma in Beijing TongRen Hospital from May to December of 2020 were continuously recruited and received a 4-month therapy of stable background treatment plus Omalizumab. Results of visual analog scales (VAS) of nasal symptoms, sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT 22) and nasal polyp scores were collected at baseline and post-treatment (1, 2, 3 and 4 months after treatment). Blood routine tests, total nasal resistances (TNR), minimum cross-sectional areas (MCA), total nasal cavity volumes (NCV), forced expiratory volumes in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) and adverse events were collected at baseline and 4 months after treatment. All results were evaluated for short-term efficacy of Omalizumab. GraphPad Prism 8.2.1 was used for statistic analysis. Results: Ten patients were collected, including 3 males and 7 females, aged (41.13±12.64) years old (x¯±s). Compared to results at baseline, the VAS scores of nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, hyposmia and headache after 4 months treatment were significantly decreased (1.80±1.48 vs 6.70±2.83, 2.40±1.27 vs 6.40±3.44, 2.70±2.91 vs 8.20±2.25, 0.60±1.08 vs 3.60±2.72, t value was 5.045, 4.243, 5.312, 3.402, respectively, all P<0.01). The scores of SNOT-22 (25.6±20 vs 61.3±33.32, t=4.127, P=0.002 6), nasal polyp scores (2.20±0.92 vs 4.60±0.84, t=9.000, P<0.01) and the count and percentage of eosinophils in peripheral blood were significantly decreased ((94.10±97.78)×109/L vs (360.00±210.80)×109/L, (32.90±27.06)% vs (64.40±20.73)%, t value was 3.678, 2.957, respectively, all P<0.05). NCV (0-5 cm and 0-7 cm) of patients were improved from baseline ((12.62±2.84) cm3 vs (10.40±2.09) cm3, (27.50±14.15) cm3 vs (16.81±6.40) cm3, t value was 2.371, 2.445, respectively, all P<0.05). Conclusions: The 4-month treatment of Omalizumab can significantly improve the nasal symptoms and quality of life of patients with recurrent CRSwNP complicated with asthma, shrink nasal polyps size and reduce the number of peripheral blood eosinophils. Omalizumab can be used as an alternative therapy for refractory CRSwNP patients in the future.

Which Is the Best Biologic for Nasal Polyps: Dupilumab, Omalizumab, or Mepolizumab? A Network Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Compared with the placebo, biologics are beneficial in reducing nasal polyp mass and safe in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, there lacks a head-to-head randomized trial comparing biologics. We aimed to determine the best biologic for CRSwNP. Methods: We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), which was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42021226766). A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library on December 29, 2020. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing biologics in adult patients for CRSwNP were included. Results: Nine RCTs with 1,190 patients comparing 3 different biologics (dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab) and the placebo were included. Dupilumab had the best efficacy in terms of nasal polyp score (NPS), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) score, University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) score, and nasal congestion score (NCS) for surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.900, 0.916, 1.000, and 0.807, respectively. Omalizumab ranked second in efficacy in terms of SNOT-22, UPSIT, and NCS for SUCRA values of 0.606, 0.500, and 0.693, respectively. Mepolizumab ranked second in efficacy in terms of NPS for SUCRA values of 0.563 and had the highest risk of adverse events (AEs) for SUCRA values of 0.746. Conclusion: This is the first NMA that compared different biologics in patients with CRSwNP. Based on the efficacy (NPS) and safety (AEs), dupilumab is the best choice and omalizumab is the second best option for CRSwNP. Although mepolizumab ranked second in efficacy, it had the highest risk of AEs.

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and a clinical diagnosis of NSAID-ERD: Results from two randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 trials.

BackgroundAbout one‐tenth of patients with difficult‐to‐treat chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) have comorbid non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug‐exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID‐ERD). Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared interleukin (IL)‐4/IL‐13 receptor component, is an approved add‐on treatment in severe CRSwNP. This post hoc analysis evaluated dupilumab efficacy and safety in patients with CRSwNP with/without NSAID‐ERD.MethodsData were pooled from the phase 3 SINUS‐24 and SINUS‐52 studies in adults with uncontrolled severe CRSwNP who received dupilumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks. CRSwNP, nasal airflow, lung function, and asthma control outcomes at Week 24 were evaluated, and treatment–subgroup interactions were assessed for patients with and without NSAID‐ERD.ResultsOf 724 patients, 204 (28.2%) had a diagnosis of NSAID‐ERD. At Week 24, least squares mean treatment differences demonstrated significant improvements in nasal polyp score, nasal congestion (NC), Lund–Mackay computed tomography, 22‐item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22), Total Symptom Score (TSS), rhinosinusitis severity visual analog scale, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), six‐item Asthma Control Questionnaire score, and improvement in smell with dupilumab versus placebo (all p < .0001) in patients with NSAID‐ERD. Treatment comparisons demonstrated significantly greater improvements with dupilumab in patients with versus without NSAID‐ERD for NC (p = .0044), SNOT‐22 (p = .0313), TSS (p = .0425), and PNIF (p = .0123).ConclusionsIn patients with uncontrolled severe CRSwNP, dupilumab significantly improved objective measures and patient‐reported symptoms to a greater extent in the presence of comorbid NSAID‐ERD than without. Dupilumab was well tolerated in patients with/without NSAID‐ERD.

Efficacy and safety of benralizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Eosinophilic inflammation has been implicated in the pathogenesis, severity, and treatment responsiveness of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of benralizumab-mediated eosinophil depletion for treating CRSwNP. The phase 3 OSTRO study enrolled patients with severe CRSwNP who were symptomatic despite treatment with intranasal corticosteroids and who had a history of systemic corticosteroid (SCS) use and/or surgery for nasal polyps (NP). Patients were randomized 1:1 to treatment with benralizumab 30mg or placebo every 4 weeks for the first 3 doses and every 8weeks thereafter. Coprimary end points were change from baseline to week 40 in NP score (NPS) and patient-reported mean nasal blockage score reported once every 2 weeks. The study population comprised 413 randomized patients (207 in the benralizumab group and 206 in the placebo group). Benralizumab significantly improved NPS and nasal blockage score compared to placebo at week 40 (P≤ .005). Improvements in Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 score at week 40, time to first NP surgery and/or SCS use for NP, and time to first NP surgery were not statistically significant between treatment groups. Nominal significance was obtained for improvement in difficulty in sense of smell score at week 40 (P=.003). Subgroup analyses suggested influences of comorbid asthma, number of NP surgeries, sex, body mass index, and baseline blood eosinophil count on treatment effects. Benralizumab was safe and well tolerated. Benralizumab, when added to standard-of-care therapy, reduced NPS, decreased nasal blockage, and reduced difficulty with sense of smell compared to placebo in patients with CRSwNP. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03401229.

Predictive value of clinical characteristics in eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A cross-sectional study in the Chinese population.

Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (ECRSwNP) is a refractory subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), with clinical characteristics differing from those of non-ECRSwNP. We aimed to explore the predictive value of clinical characteristics, including medical history, symptoms, and signs, prior to ECRSwNP diagnosis, and to develop a nomogram for use in clinical practice. A total of 502 patients with CRSwNP were enrolled. Based on the degree of eosinophilic infiltration in nasal polyps (NPs), patients were classified as ECRSwNP or non-ECRSwNP group. Participants' demographic characteristics, asthma history, severity of nasal symptoms (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, hyposmia, and facial pain/headache) according to the visual analog scale, and nasal polyp scores based on polyp scoring system were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was performed to screen for independent risk factors, and a model nomogram was constructed. The percentage of asthmatic patients and the hyposmia, rhinorrhea, and total nasal symptom scores were significantly higher in ECRSwNP patients than that in non-ECRSwNP patients. The nasal polyp score was lower in the eosinophilic group than that in the non-eosinophilic group. Logistic regression analysis revealed that asthma history and hyposmia, rhinorrhea and nasal polyp scores were independent predictors of ECRSwNP. A nomogram consisting of these four independent risk factors was constructed, and its C-index was 0.808 (95% CI, 0.771 to 0.846). The nomogram based on asthma history and olfactory, rhinorrhea, and nasal polyp scores could help predict ECRSwNP, providing a simple, fast, and practical way to distinguish ECRSwNP from non-ECRSwNP cases in clinical practice.

Long-term efficacy and safety of omalizumab for nasal polyposis in an open-label extension study

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) frequently remains uncontrolled despite maximal medical therapy and sinonasal surgery, presenting several unmet needs and challenges. Omalizumab previously demonstrated efficacy in CRSwNP in duplicate phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (POLYP 1, POLYP 2). This open-label extension evaluated the continued efficacy, safety, and durability of response of omalizumab in adults with CRSwNP who completed POLYP 1 or 2. After 24 weeks of omalizumab or placebo in POLYP 1 and 2, patients (n= 249) received open-label omalizumab plus background nasal mometasone therapy for 28 weeks and were subsequently followed for 24 weeks after omalizumab discontinuation. Efficacy end points assessed change from baseline for the coprimary end points, Nasal Polyp Score and Nasal Congestion Score, and the secondary end points of Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22, Total Nasal Symptom Score and its components, and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test scores. Safety objectives included incidence of adverse events and adverse events leading to omalizumab discontinuation. Patients who continued omalizumab experienced further improvements across coprimary end points and secondary end points through 52 weeks. Patients who switched from placebo to omalizumab experienced favorable responses across end points through week 52 that were similar to POLYP 1 and 2 at week 24. After omalizumab discontinuation, scores gradually worsened over the 24-week follow-up, but remained improved from pretreatment levels for both groups. The safety profile was similar to previous reports. The efficacy and safety profile from this study supports extended omalizumab treatment up to 1 year for CRSwNP with inadequate response to nasal corticosteroids.

Dupilumab effectiveness for the treatment of patients with concomitant atopic dermatitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.

Dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin (IL) 4 and IL13 pathways. We performed a retrospective observational study to evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab for the treatment of adult patients referred to our department, from January 2019 to May 2021, with a diagnosis of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and concomitant chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), with a clinical indication for dupilumab treatment. Skin disease activity was assessed using EASI, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pruritus (P-NRS) and sleep (S-NRS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The CRSwNP activity was evaluated using 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), endoscopic nasal polyp score (ENPS), nasal congestion or obstruction score (scale 0-3), loss-of-smell score (scale 0-3), and rhinosinusitis disease severity (visual analog scale 0-10cm). A significant improvement of all the score values was recorded assessing patients at baseline, week (W)16, and W24. In particular, concerning the CRSwNP, a reduction of ENPS score (baseline: 4.9 ± 1.85; W16: 2.49 ± 1.42, p < 0.01; W24: 1.68 ± 1.25, p < 0.01) and SNOT-22 (baseline: 35.9 ± 19.11; W16: 12.85 ± 6.31, p < 0.01; W24: 10.71 ± 7.29, p < 0.01) was observed. Furthermore, dupilumab is a labeled drug for the treatment of both AD and CRSwNP. The use of a single drug to obtain the improvement up to the near remission of AD and CRSwNP increases not only patient's compliance with the treatment, but also the benefits in terms of health cost related to these chronic diseases.

Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of omalizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and to identify evidence gaps that will guide future research on omalizumab for CRSwNP.DesignSystematic review...

Defining the Efficacy of Omalizumab in Nasal Polyposis: A POLYP 1 and POLYP 2 Subgroup Analysis

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous disease with variable underlying pathophysiologies. Numerous patient factors have been linked to differences in disease severity, control, and response to treatment, including asthma status, aspirin sensitivity, previous sinonasal surgery, and blood eosinophil levels. The present study examines the efficacy of the anti-immunoglobulin E therapy, omalizumab, versus placebo in patients with CRSwNP from the replicate POLYP 1 (NCT03280550) and POLYP 2 (NCT03280537) trials, grouped by inherent patient characteristics to determine the response to therapy. Patients in prespecified subgroups from POLYP 1 and POLYP 2 (studies pooled for analysis) were examined. Subgroups included blood eosinophil count at baseline (>300 or ≤300cells/μL), previous sinonasal surgery (yes or no), asthma status (yes or no), and aspirin sensitivity status (yes or no). Subgroups were examined for subgroup-specific adjusted mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) (omalizumab-placebo) in change from baseline at week 24 in Nasal Congestion Score (NCS), Nasal Polyp Score (NPS), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). Adjusted mean difference (95% CI) (omalizumab-placebo) in NCS, NPS, SNOT-22, TNSS, and UPSIT change from baseline at week 24 consistently favored omalizumab treatment over placebo in patients with blood eosinophil count >300 and ≤300cells/μL, with or without previous sinonasal surgery, asthma, and aspirin sensitivity. Together, these data suggest broad efficacy of omalizumab across clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with CRSwNP, independent of the underlying patient factors examined, including those with high eosinophil levels and those who have undergone previous surgery, which are associated with high recurrence. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: POLYP 1: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03280550 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03280550); POLYP 2: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03280537 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03280537).

The Choice of Biologics in Patients with Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

Patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps represent an unmet clinical need in terms of recurrent disease despite current medical and surgical therapy. Targeting type 2 inflammatory cytokines (IL4/5/13) appears to be a promising therapeutic approach for such patients akin to what has already been seen in severe asthma. An indirect comparison from phase 3 placebo-controlled trials has shown relative improvements in the coprimary end point of nasal polyp score (NPS) ranging from a 15% reduction (-0.8 units) with mepolizumab, 18% with omalizumab (-1.14 units), and 35% (-2.06 units) with dupilumab. This trend was mirrored by relative improvements in health status with the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test score showing a 21% reduction (-13.7 units) with mepolizumab, 27% (-16.1 units) with omalizumab, and 43% (-21.1 units) with dupilumab, all exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of 8.9 units. All biologics improved the coprimary end point of nasal airway blockage and also reduced the need for rescue medical and/or surgical polypectomy. We advocate performing real-life studies looking at the response to biologics in patients who are at increased risk for disease recurrence, including initial optimal medical and surgical polyp clearance before commencing biologics.

Dupilumab efficacy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps from SINUS-52 is unaffected by eosinophilic status.

BackgroundThe human monoclonal antibody dupilumab blocks interleukin (IL)‐4 andIL‐13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. Dupilumab, on background mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS), improved outcomes in the phase III SINUS‐52 study (NCT02898454) in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This posthoc analysis of SINUS‐52 examined whether eosinophilic status of CRSwNP was a predictor of dupilumab efficacy.MethodsPatients were randomized 1:1:1 to dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) until week 52; dupilumab 300 mg q2w until Week 24, then 300 mg every 4 weeks until week 52; or placebo (MFNS) until week 52. Coprimary endpoints were change from baseline in nasal polyps score (NPS), nasal congestion (NC), and Lund‐Mackay score assessed by CT (LMK‐CT) at week 24. Patients (n = 438) were stratified by eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) status according to the Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Rhinosinusitis algorithm.ResultsDupilumab significantly improved NPS, NC, and LMK‐CT scores versus placebo at week 24 in all ECRS subgroups (p < 0.001), with improvements maintained or increased at week 52 (p < 0.001). There was no significant interaction between ECRS subgroup (non‐/mild or moderate/severe) and dupilumab treatment effect for all endpoints at weeks 24 and 52 (p > 0.05), except LMK‐CT at week 24 (p = 0.0275). Similar results were seen for the secondary endpoints. Dupilumab was well tolerated across all ECRS subgroups.ConclusionDupilumab produced consistent improvement in symptoms of severe CRSwNP irrespective of ECRS status. Therefore, blood eosinophil level may not be a suitable biomarker for dupilumab efficacy in CRSwNP.

Biologic Therapies for Allergic Rhinitis and Nasal Polyposis.

There is an emerging body of research on targeted biologic therapies for the treatment of severe inflammatory nasal disorders, especially chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). This paper will evaluate the efficacy of biologic therapies for severe nasal inflammation by summarizing key preclinical trials of biologics for animal models of allergic rhinitis and the recent phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of biologic therapies for CRSwNP. Biologics that target the IL-4 receptor (dupilumab), IgE (omalizumab), and IL-5 (mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab) in patients with CRSwNP have shown improvement of various metrics including Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores, Nasal Polyp Scores (NPS), Nasal Congestion Scores (NCS), and Lund-Mackay sinus opacification scores. The efficacy demonstrated through the dupilumab phase 3 trials (LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 and SINUS-52) led to approval of the first biologic for the treatment of CRSwNP. Phase 3 trials for omalizumab (POLYP 1 and 2) and mepolizumab (SYNAPSE study) and post hoc analyses of phase 3 asthma studies for reslizumab and benralizumab have also demonstrated positive results for the use of biologics for patients with CRSwNP. Future efficacy studies and risk/benefit and cost analyses of these biologics and other cytokine targets for allergic rhinitis with and without nasal polyposis need to be performed.

Multidisciplinary consensus on a stepwise treatment algorithm for management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Multidisciplinary consensus on a stepwise treatment algorithm for management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.