Health Co-Inquiry is a process whereby stakeholders in management of chronic health (or mental health) conditions collaborate, with efforts toward stakeholder activation, person-centeredness, evidence-based practice, and integrated care. With rapid growth of Internet use by the general population in the new millennium, persons with chronic conditions and their caregivers, friends, family, and health providers may be using the Internet more in order to seek information, share advice, and give or find support and services. Thus, the Internet can provide an important avenue for Health Co-Inquiry and for researchers who want to know about stakeholder experiences. A fundamental aim of the current authors’ “Health Co-Inquiry Project” is to better understand stakeholder experiences in chronic conditions through their online narratives. Here we report, specifically, about our development of a Bifurcated Method for analyzing narratives online. It involves: (1) thematic analysis of narratives from publicly available blogs, forums, and other websites related to chronic health conditions, and (2) creation of a computer program that “crawls” the URLs to locate and count the frequencies of general health and condition-specific terms and provide pictorial representations of the relative frequencies of words on a web page. The Bifurcated Method is novel in social research, using online forums as data, evaluating them thematically, and crawling them with a computer program that quantitizes specified search terms. One benefit is comparison of results from the two sub-parts to look for apparently convergent and divergent information across the two prongs of analysis. Safeguards include removing stakeholder monikers from quoted narratives, and striving to use only publicly available URLs. The present report provides details about the Bifurcated Method and considers limitations of the approach for those who might use it. Specific results for each health condition from the larger Health Co-Inquiry Project are provided elsewhere.