332 SEER, 82, 2, 2004 appraisalor investigation.This is a significantomission in his analysis,for it is not clear, given Kharms'slove of parody, that we should regardthis work or others like it as having unequivocal or genuine philosophical intent. Why should we not treat 'On existence, time, space' as a parody of a philosophical treatise?Heinonen does not even raisethe question. Finally, Heinonen's conclusion that one should more properly define Starukha as paradoxical rather that absurd can be challenged. Paradox is intimately connected with the absurd. The advantage of calling something a paradox is that you tame its power to baffle, frustrate, and threaten understanding (removing the impediment so to speak). It is essentially a human response to the dread that incidents are beyond rational explanation. Paradox does not necessarilyremove the absurd;it may simply appear to do so. In this monograph, Heinonen conducts a dialogue with previous analyses of Starukha. His current work itself forms a basis for further dialogue and discussion that can only benefit and enrich the study of Starukha in particular and Kharms in general. Dublin NEIL CARRICK Pifer,Ellen (ed.). Vladimir Nabokov's 'Lolita': A Casebook. Casebooksin Criticism. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, 2003. viii + 209 pp. Notes. Bibliographies.Suggestedreading.f30?.o; Ci 2.99. THIS volume collects nine previously published essays on Nabokov's most famous novel, including Michael Wood's review of Adrian Lyne's controversial film version of 1997, and Herbert Gold's interview with Nabokov which appeared in the I967 Summer/Fall issue of the ParisReview.The purpose of Oxford University Press's'Casebooksin Criticism'seriesis to 'offeranalytical and interpretive frameworksfor understanding key texts in world literature and film' (back cover). Considering the vast arrayof critical studies on Lolita alone, gathering together a cohesive set of essays which demonstrate the variety of responsesto the novel is not an easy task.Apart from the inevitable repetitions, particularly concerning the novel's publication history and reception, the pieces both reflectLolita'smajor themes and addressits central questions. These provide a useful starting point for new readers, but for Nabokov scholars, Pifer has taken the opportunity to bring together articles that might well have otherwise escaped their attention. These include, particularly,the essaysbyJohn Haegart (English LiterayHistoiy,I985),Jenefer Shute (Amerikastudien/American Studies,I985) and Nomi Tamir-Ghez (Poetics Today,I979). The volume falls into three distinct sections of three essayseach. The first, following Pifer's introduction, addresses the problems Lolitapresents to the readerin termsof narrativevoice, intent, reliability,and structure.The second considers representationsof childhood and innocence in the novel, whilst the thirdand final section explores the ramificationsof culturalconflict centralto Humbert Humbert'sexperience. Nabokov scholarswill be most familiarwith the essays by Boyd, Frosch, Pifer, Sweeney, and Wood, all of whom are REVIEWS 333 leading figuresin Nabokov studies,but it is interestingto see workby scholars essentially from outside the mainstream alongside them, all of which offer challenging and dynamic perspectives on issues that have dominated the preoccupations of critics during the almost half century since the novel's publication. The volume opens with Nomi Tamir-Ghez's strong and lucid analysisof the novel's narrativemechanics which detailsHumbert Humbert's narrative manipulations, the strategy of his use of literary forms and conventions, particularly the diary and memoir, his narrative self-consciousness , the multiple audiences he addresses, and his sustained 'internal polemic' (p. 32). Continuing the theme of narrative unreliability, Thomas R. Frosch'sessayon parodyexploresthe novel's self-reflexivity,itsplayfulness, itsreworkingofliterarygenre anditsdistortedmoraluniverse.The concluding piece in this section turns from the novel's narrative dimensions to its structuralcomplexities. BrianBoyd'sresponse to revisionistinterpretationsof Humbert Humbert's revenge scenario which firstappeared in Nabokov Studies in I995, essentiallyserves to introduce new readersto the debate concerning Quilty's murder and the novel's chronology. One cannot help but feel, however, that in this context the issuewould have been better representedby an example of one of the many excellent and provocative theories to which Boyd refers, rather than by his very emphatic and apparently conclusive counter-argument. Also, such a closed and finite perspective is oddly out of keeping with the very open character and approach of the first two essays, indeed, of much of the remainderof the volume. Nevertheless...
Read full abstract