Nanoliposomal Irinotecan Research Articles

A Retrospective Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of Nanoliposomal Irinotecan in Elderly Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Although nanoliposomal irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI+5-FU/LV) has been used to treat first-line resistant unresectable pancreatic cancer, the efficacy and safety data among the elderly remain limited. We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes among elderly patients. Patients treated with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV were assigned to the elderly (≥75 years) and non-elderly (<75 years) groups. Herein, 85 patients received nal-IRI+5-FU/LV, with 32 assigned to the elderly group. Patient characteristics in the elderly and non-elderly groups were as follows: age: 78.5 (75-88)/71 (48-74), male: 17/32 (53%/60%), performance status (ECOG) 0:9/20 (28%/38%), nal-IRI+5-FU/LV in second line: 23/24 (72%/45%), respectively. A significantly high number of elderly patients exhibited aggravated kidney and hepatic functions. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the elderly group vs. non-elderly group were 9.4 months vs. 9.9 months (hazard ratio (HR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-2.67, p = 0.16) and 3.4 months vs. 3.7 months (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.86-2.32, p = 0.17). Both groups exhibited a similar incidence of efficacy and adverse events. There were no significant differences in OS and PFS between groups. We analyzed the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as indicators that could determine eligibility for nal-IRI+5-FU/LV. The median CAR and NLR scores in the ineligible group were 1.17 and 4.23 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018, respectively). Elderly patients with worse CAR and NLR score could be deemed ineligible for nal-IRI+5-FU/LV.

Hepatic arterial infusion with nanoliposomal irinotecan leads to significant regression of tumor size of colorectal liver metastases in a CC531 rat model.

Long-term therapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases remains challenging. Intraarterial treatments aim to avoid systemic adverse effects of chemotherapy. Nanoliposomal cytotoxic drugs manage to increase the drug concentration within the tumor while reducing toxicity in healthy tissue. In this study we analyzed the effect of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) with nanoliposomal irinotecan with or without the combination of embolization particles in a rat model for colorectal liver metastases. For the study 32 WAG/Rij rats received subcapsular tumor implantation with CC531 rat colonic adenocarcinoma cells. After ten days tumor size was assessed via ultrasound and animals underwent HAI. One group served as control receiving NaCl 0.9 % (Sham), the three treatment groups received either nanoliposomal irinotecan (HAI nal iri), Embocept® S (HAI Embo) or Embocept® S and nanoliposomal irinotecan (HAI Embo+nal iri). Three days after treatment animals were sacrificed after assessment of tumor size. As a result all treatment groups showed a significant reduction in tumor growth compared to Sham (p<0.05). Expression of the apoptosis marker caspase-3 was enhanced in HAI nal iri and HAI Embo+nal iri compared to Sham and HAI Embo and even significantly enhanced after HAI Embo+nal iri in comparison to Sham (p<0.05). We were able to show thatHAI with Embocept® S led to significantly reduced tumor growth while HAI with nanoliposomal irinotecan alone or in combination with Embocept® S even led to a reduction of tumor size. Thus, we demonstrate that intraarterial treatment with nanoliposomal irinotecan effectively inhibits tumor growth in a rat model of colorectal liver metastases and demands further investigation.

Abstract 6716: Preclinical evaluation of nano-liposomal irinotecan in pediatric solid tumor patient-derived xenografts

Abstract Background: Pediatric solid tumors are rare and the use of well characterized preclinical models can be a helpful tool to prioritize novel drug combinations and formulations which are challenging to test in a limited patient population. Irinotecan (IRN) has shown efficacy in diverse pediatric cancers where children are often treated on an extended low-dose schedule rather than a single large dose commonly used in adults. The use of nano-liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) is a promising strategy as 95% of the drug remains encapsulated during systemic exposure while maintaining prolonged exposure in the tumor. Adult clinical trials have shown reduced side effects without compromising efficacy but nal-IRI has had limited use thus far in pediatric cancers. Methods: Orthotopic xenograft models of Ewing sarcoma (EWS, 4 models) and rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS, 2 models) were generated by injecting luciferase labeled cells into the femur and hind-leg muscle of nude mice respectively. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies on normal and tumor-bearing mice were performed for both nal-IRI and standard IRN to determine matched human AUC-guided dosing and schedule of chemotherapy agents. Mice were randomized to single agent and relevant combinations of nal-IRI with PARP inhibitors and temozolomide (EWS) and with vincristine and temozolomide (RMS) and compared to the same regimens using standard IRN. Therapy was given on a clinically relevant schedule with each course consisting of 21 days and tumor response was measured weekly using bioluminescence. Results: PK studies showed that plasma levels of the active metabolite of IRN (SN-38) drop quickly for both standard IRN and nal-IRI single dosed mice while the levels of SN-38 were maintained in the tumor for several days using the nal-IRI formulation. In all 6 models tested, nal-IRI combinations were as or more effective when compared to regimens using standard IRN. No significant toxicity was seen in mice treated with nal-IRI combinations. Conclusions: The substitution of nal-IRI for standard IRN remains a promising strategy in pediatrics with the potential to reduce side effects as well as hospital visits due to the dosing schedule with nal-IRI given once per cycle where standard IRN is often given for 5 or 10 days in children. Our preclinical PK data confirmed the liposomal formulation resulted in sustained SN-38 levels in the tumor and efficacy was maintained or improved in pediatric cancer models. The combination of nal-IRI with temozolomide and talazoparib is now being tested in a multi-center randomized phase I/II trial for children with relapsed solid tumors and this data supports consideration for use in other pediatric cancer trials both in the upfront and relapse setting. Citation Format: Elizabeth Stewart, Kaley Blankenship, Burgess Freeman, Sara Federico, Michael Dyer. Preclinical evaluation of nano-liposomal irinotecan in pediatric solid tumor patient-derived xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6716.

Second-line and third-line therapy with nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) in pancreatic cancer: a single-center experience and review of literature.

Prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer is still extremely poor. First-line palliative therapies with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel have been established in the last decade. In the second-line, 5-FU/LV in combination with nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) after gemcitabine has been shown to be effective. However, the use of nal-IRI as third-line therapy after FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based chemotherapies is still controversial. In this study, we report about the use of 5-FU/LV + nal-IRI in a daily practice and analyze whether nal-IRI is an option as third-line therapy after FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. This is a single center retrospective analysis of patients with irresectable pancreatic cancer who were treated with 5-FU/LV and nal-IRI from 2017 to 2021 as second- or third-line palliative treatment. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed, and multivariate analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors. Twenty-nine patients receiving 5-FU/LV and nal-IRI were included in the analysis. The majority of patients (n=19) received 5-FU/nal-IRI as third-line therapy after pre-exposition to FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Median OS and PFS were 9.33 months (95% CI: 3.37, 15.30) and 2.90 months (95% CI: 1.64, 4.16), respectively. Furthermore, patients receiving nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV as third-line treatment also showed some benefits, with no OS difference compared to second-line patients (9.33 vs. 10.27 months; HR: 1.85; 95% CI: 0.64, 5.41; P=0.253). Adverse effects were similar to reported trials. In our study, the use of 5-FU/nal-IRI in unselected patients with advanced pancreatic cancer showed similar OS, PFS and tolerance as randomized prospective phase II/III trials. Interestingly, the use of 5-FU/nal-IRI seemed to be beneficial in third-line therapy, despite a pre-exposure to non-liposomal irinotecan.

Multicenter observational study of nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer (NAPOLEON-2): Final retrospective results.

706 Background: Nanoliposomal irinotecan (NAL-IRI) and fluorouracil with folinic acid (NFF) is the standard regimen after gemcitabine-based therapy for unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer (urPC). We conducted this NAPOLEON-2 study to investigate the efficacy and safety of NFF and explore the predictive or prognostic factors, retrospectively and prospectively, in the real world. We previously reported the interim analysis of the retrospective data 6 months after the end of data collection ( Ann Oncol. 2022;33(suppl 4): S289-S290). Here, we report the final data 1 year after data collection. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from urPC patients treated with NFF who received at least one previous chemotherapy in 21 hospitals in Japan from June 2020 to May 2021. Patient characteristics, treatment efficacy, and adverse events were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. OS and PFS among the therapeutic lines of NFF were also analyzed. Results: NFF was administered to 161 patients. The median follow-up period was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6–8.9); median age, 67 years (range, 38–85), with 73 female patients (45%). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0/1/2/3 in 74/76/10/1 patients, respectively. Nineteen patients (12%) had locally advanced disease; 142 (88%) had metastatic disease; 89 (55%) had liver metastasis; and 44 (27%) had peritoneal metastasis. All patients previously received gemcitabine-based therapy. NFF was administered as 2nd/3rd/4th-or-later-line therapy to 104/41/16 patients, respectively. The median OS was 8.1 months (95% CI, 7.1–9.7); median PFS, 3.4 months (95% CI, 2.8–4.4); overall response rate, 5%; and disease control rate, 52%. The relative dose intensity was 81.6% with NAL-IRI and 90.7% with fluorouracil. The initial dose of NAL-IRI was reduced in 57 patients (35%), mainly owing to UGT1A1 examination status (8%), followed by decreased organ function or worsened performance status (6%). Dosage reduction during treatment (independent of the initial dose reduction) was performed in 67 patients (42%), mainly owing to neutropenia (16%) and anorexia (11%). Frequent Grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (24%), anorexia (12%), and leukopenia (12%). No Grade 5 adverse events were observed. The median OS and PFS for NFF in the 2nd-line group, compared with the 3rd-or-later-line group, were 7.6 vs 9.1 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.64–1.35; p = 0.68) and 2.9 vs 3.8 months (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.64–1.24; p = 0.49), respectively. Conclusions: NFF had appropriate efficacy and manageable toxicity profiles, consistent with our previous report. NFF could be a candidate for 2nd-or-later-line regimens in the real world.

Efficacy of the third-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

711 Background: First-line FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GNP) have improved the survival outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) and nano-liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-FU/leucovorin is proven as the second-line agents. The current study aims to assess the efficacy of the third-line palliative chemotherapy in APC. Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed in a single tertiary hospital between 2012 and 2020. The enrolled patients have APC who received the first and second-line chemotherapy. To fine the efficacy of the third-line chemotherapy, Kaplan Meier curve with cox-regression analysis was performed. Results: Of total 1,152 patients with pancreatic cancer, 362 patients were enrolled. Of these, 125 received the third-line chemotherapy and 238 received only supportive care after progression of the second-line chemotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 60.3 years (range 36.0 – 86.0) and males were 52.0%. The first-line chemotherapy regimen was FOLFIRINOX (85, 68.0%), GNP (33, 26.4%), and others (7, 5.6%). The second-line chemotherapy regimen was GNP (55, 44.0%), FOLFIRINOX (34, 27.2%). As the third-line regimen, TS-1 and nal-IRI plus 5-FU/leucovorin were 73 (58.4%) and 20 (16.0%). The median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 18.0 months in all patients (95% CI, 14.6 – 21.4). The median OS after progression of the second-line therapy were 15.1 (95% CI, 12.8 – 17.5) and 8.5 weeks (95% CI, 7.7 – 9.4, p=0.007) between the patients with the third-line chemotherapy and supportive care only. Of the patients with the third-line chemotherapy, female showed the significant longer OS than male (12.4 (95% CI 10.2-14.6) vs. 6.6 weeks (95% CI 13.4-19.7), p=0.042). Conclusions: The current study suggested that proceeding with the third-line chemotherapy could be recommended in some patients. Females showed significantly more benefit than males. Further research on the selection for patient who will get the benefit from the third-line therapy is necessary.

Efficacy and safety of nanoliposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and folinic acid after irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: Results of the retrospective part of the NAPOLEON-2 study.

705 Background: Nanoliposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and folinic acid (nal-IRI/FU/LV; NFF) is the standard regimen after gemcitabine-based therapy for unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer (urPC). However, the efficacy and safety of NFF in patients who previously received irinotecan-based chemotherapy remain unclear. Methods: This retrospective study collected data from patients with urPC who received at least one previous chemotherapy before receiving NFF therapy at 21 hospitals in Japan between June 2020 and May 2021 (NAPOLEON-2 study). We analyzed antitumor efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after the initiation of NFF and compared adverse events (AEs) between previous irinotecan users and non-users. Results: NFF was administered to 161 patients. The median follow-up period was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.6–8.9). All patients received prior gemcitabine-based therapy, and NFF was administered as the second-, third-, and fourth-or-later-line chemotherapy in 104, 41, and 16 patients, respectively. Eighteen patients (11%) previously received irinotecan. Patients’ characteristics did not significantly differ between irinotecan users (n = 18) and non-users (n = 143), excluding age (mean [range], 64 [38–78] vs. 68 [47–85] years; p = 0.01), the lung metastasis rate (44% vs. 14%; p &lt; 0.01), the treatment line (2nd/3rd/4th-or-later, 0%/56%/44% vs. 73%/22%/6%; p &lt; 0.01), and the pretreatment period (15.3 [6.8–45.0] vs. 9.1 [1.4–36.2] months; p &lt; 0.01). The median relative dose intensities of nal-IRI were 87.1% and 81.1% in irinotecan users and non-users, respectively (p = 0.28), and those of FU were 93.5% and 89.2%, respectively (p = 0.54). The objective response rate (6% vs. 5%; p = 0.90), disease control rate (44% vs. 53%; p = 0.49), PFS (2.8 months vs. 3.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.23; 95% CI = 0.74–2.05; p = 0.42), and OS (9.2 months vs. 8.0 months; HR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.49–1.57; p = 0.66) did not differ between irinotecan users and non-users, nor did the rates of Grade 3/4 hematological (p = 0.68) and non-hematological (p = 0.13) AEs. Among irinotecan users, the duration of irinotecan-based therapy and the irinotecan-free interval before NFF did not affect the efficacy of NFF. Conclusions: NFF might be effective and safe even in patients with urPC who received irinotecan-based chemotherapy irrespective of its duration or the interval to NFF. Therefore, NFF is a possible treatment option after irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Further studies with a sufficient number of patients and a prospective design are warranted to examine the efficacy of NFF after irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

Biomarker analysis for patients with pancreatic cancer treated with nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin

BackgroundNanoliposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) is a standard second-line therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer. Identification of biomarkers is important to determine appropriate treatment strategies. We investigated the clinical practice outcomes and biomarkers associated with the nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV regimen.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of patients treated with nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV as a second or subsequent treatment after gemcitabine-based therapy between June 2020 and March 2021 at Shizuoka Cancer Center.ResultsWe analyzed 55 consecutive patients who met the selection criteria. At a median of 9.4 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 2.3 and 6.6 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) was significantly associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09–4.30; P = 0.028) and OS (0 vs. 1 or 2: HR 2.46; 95% CI 1.15–5.25; P = 0.029). The OS was significantly longer in patients with CA19–9 response than in those without CA19–9 response (12.6 vs. 5.6 months; HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.08–0.75; P = 0.014).ConclusionsNanoliposomal irinotecan was efficacious and tolerable in clinical practice. GPS and CA19–9 response were good candidates as predictive biomarkers, whereas GPS was a good candidate prognostic biomarker for the nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV regimen.

A real-world analysis on the efficacy and tolerability of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in Belgium.

Currently, nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) + 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/LV) is the only approved second-line treatment for patients suffering from metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). However, also other chemotherapeutic regimens are used in this setting and due to the lack of clear real-world data on the efficacy of the different regimens, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment sequence for mPDAC patients. To provide information on the safe and efficacious use of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV in clinical practice in Belgium, which is needed for healthcare professionals to estimate the risk-benefit ratio of the intervention. Medical data of adult patients with mPDAC who were treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV in one of the participating Belgian hospitals were retrospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to obtain survival curves to estimate the median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). All other results were presented descriptively. A total of 56 patients [median age at diagnosis: 69 years (range 43 years), 57.1% male] were included. Patients received a median of 5 (range 49 cycles) nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV cycles, extended over 10 weeks (range 130.8 weeks). The median start dose for nal-IRI was 70 mg/m² (range 49.24 mg/m²) and chemotherapy dose reduction and delay occurred in, respectively, 42.8% and 37.5% of the patients. The median OS was 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.6-8.4 months) with a 6-month survival rate of 57.4% and a 1-year survival rate of 27.8% in the overall study population. The median OS for patients treated with nal-IRI as second-line therapy or as later-line treatment was, respectively, 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.9-7.0 months) and 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.2-no upper limit). In the overall study population, a median PFS of 3.1 months (95% CI: 2.4-4.6 months) and a disease control rate of 48.3%, comprising 30.4% stable disease, 16.1% partial and 1.8% complete response, was observed. The median PFS for patients treated with nal-IRI as second-line therapy was 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.8-4.8 months) while this was 2.4 months (95% CI: 1.9-9.1 months) for those that received nal-IRI in a later-line treatment. In terms of safety, gastrointestinal problems occurred most (64.3% of the patients) and from all reported treatment emergent adverse events, 39.2% were grade 3 or 4. Nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV is a valuable, effective, and safe sequential treatment option following gemcitabine-based therapy in patients with mPDAC. Retrospective study on the efficacy and tolerability of liposomal irinotecan (NALIRI); ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0509506 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05095064?term=naliri&draw=2&rank=2).

Update on management of pancreatic cancer: a literature review.

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy with high mortality. At the time of diagnosis, majority of patients (80-90%) present with either locally advanced unresectable disease or metastatic disease. Even after curative resection, the recurrence rate remains quite high. This article aimed at reviewing the updated management of pancreatic cancer. We identified literature by searching Medline and PubMed from January 2010 to June 2023 using the keywords. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to optimize the outcomes for both curable and advanced diseases. Management of pancreatic cancer divided into resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced, and metastatic diseases. Surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard treatment approach for resectable pancreatic cancer. The recommended adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with good functional status is modified FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin). The recommended adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with suboptimal functional status is gemcitabine plus capecitabine or monotherapy gemcitabine. The optimal treatment strategy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is still uncertain. Traditionally, upfront surgery is the choice of treatment. There is increasing evidence showing benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. However, the optimal neoadjuvant treatment regimen was not certain yet. Advancement of chemotherapy has a positive impact for the survival of advanced disease. For patients with good functional status, the recommended first-line systemic chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced disease or metastatic disease is combination chemotherapy regimens such as FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. For patients with suboptimal functional status, the recommended first-line systemic chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced disease or metastatic disease is gemcitabine plus capecitabine or monotherapy gemcitabine. Recently, more researches showed promising results in the use of nanoliposomal irinotecan, targeted agents such as a poly [adenosine diphosphate (ADB)-ribose] polymerase inhibitor, tyrosine receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors, and immune checkpoint-inhibitors. Pancreatic cancer is a challenging disease for management. Radical surgery itself is not enough for prolong survival. The improvement of chemotherapy, target agents and immunotherapy with multidisciplinary approach will be the only solution for improvement of survival outcome and quality of life for patients with pancreatic cancer.

A Multicenter Phase 1 Trial Evaluating Nanoliposomal Irinotecan for Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Combined with Cytoreductive Surgery for Patients with Peritoneal Surface Disease.

Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) is a promising novel hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) agent given its enhanced efficacy against gastrointestinal tumors, safety profile, thermo-synergy, and heat stability. This report describes the first in-human phase 1 clinical trial of nal-IRI during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC. Patients with peritoneal surface disease (PSD) from appendiceal and colorectal neoplasms were enrolled in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation trial using nal-IRI (70-280 mg/m2) during HIPEC for 30 min at 41 ± 1 °C. The primary outcome was safety. The secondary outcomes were pharmacokinetics (PK) and disease-free survival. Adverse events (AEs) categorized as grade 2 or higher were recorded. The serious AEs (SAEs) were mortality, grade ≥ 3 AEs, and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Irinotecan and active metabolite SN38 were measured in plasma and peritoneal washings. The study enrolled 18 patients, who received nal-IRI during HIPEC at 70 mg/m2 (n = 3), 140 mg/m2 (n = 6), 210 mg/m2 (n = 3), and 280 mg/m2 (n = 6). No DLT or mortality occurred. The overall morbidity for CRS/HIPEC was 39% (n = 7). Although one patient experienced neutropenia, no AE (n = 131) or SAE (n = 3) was definitively attributable to nal-IRI. At 280 mg/m2, plasma irinotecan and SN38 measurements showed maximum concentrations of 0.4 ± 0.6 µg/mL and 3.0 ± 2.4 ng/mL, a median time to maximum concentration of 24.5 and 26 h, and areas under the curve of 22.6 h*µg/mL and 168 h*ng/mL, respectively. At the 6-month follow-up visit, 83% (n = 15) of the patients remained disease-free. In this phase 1 HIPEC trial (NCT04088786), nal-IRI was observed to be safe, and PK profiling showed low systemic absorption overall. These data support future studies testing the efficacy of nal-IRI in CRS/HIPEC.

98P Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid, S-1 alone, or FOLFIRINOX as second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel: A pooled analysis of NAPOLEON-1 and NAPOLEON-2

Among nanoliposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and folinic acid (nal-IRI/5-FU/LV), S-1 alone (S-1), and FOLFIRINOX (FFX), the appropriate therapies for patients previously treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) are unclear.

134TiP A phase I/II study of nanoliposomal irinotecan plus S-1 in metastatic pancreatic cancer after first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy

S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug, showed promising results in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC) in a phase 3 study (Ueno, 2013). Thus, the nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI)/S-1 regimen, replacing 5-FU/LV in the nal-IRI+5-FU/LV regimen with S-1, not only improves the convenience of treatment with no requirement of intravenous port system, but it is also expected to exert stronger anticancer effects. Thus, a phase 1/2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nal-IRI/S-1 for the treatment of metastatic PC after previous gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was conducted.

Intranasal delivery of nanoliposomal SN-38 for treatment of diffuse midline glioma.

Diffuse midline gliomas, including diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs), are among the most malignant and devastating childhood brain cancers. Despite aggressive treatment, nearly all children with these tumors succumb to their disease within 2 years of diagnosis. Due to the anatomical location of the tumors within the pons, surgery is not a treatment option, and distribution of most systematically administered drugs is limited by the blood-brain barrier (BBB). New drug delivery systems that bypass the BBB are desperately needed to improve outcomes of DIPG patients. Intranasal delivery (IND) is a practical and noninvasive drug delivery system that bypasses the BBB and delivers the drugs to the brain through the olfactory and trigeminal neural pathways. In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy of nanoliposomal (LS) irinotecan (CPT-11) and an active metabolite of CPT-11, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), using IND in DIPG patient-derived xenograft models. In vitro responses to LS-CPT-11 and LS-SN-38 in DIPG cells were evaluated with cell viability, colony formation, and apoptosis assays. The cellular uptakes of rhodamine-PE (Rhod)-labeled LS-CPT-11 and LS-SN-38 were analyzed with fluorescence microscopy. Mice bearing DIPG patient-derived xenografts were treated with IND of LS-control (empty liposome), LS-CPT-11, or LS-SN-38 by IND for 4 weeks. In vivo responses were measured for tumor growth by serial bioluminescence imaging and animal subject survival. The concentration of SN-38 in the brainstem tumor administered by IND was determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Immunohistochemical analyses of the proliferative and apoptotic responses of in vivo tumor cells were performed with Ki-67 and TUNEL staining. LS-SN-38 inhibited DIPG cell growth and colony formation and increased apoptosis, outperforming LS-CPT-11. Rhod-labeled LS-SN-38 showed intracellular fluorescence signals beginning at 30 minutes and peaking at 24 hours following treatment. LC-MS analysis revealed an SN-38 concentration in the brainstem tumor of 0.66 ± 0.25 ng/ml (5.43% ± 0.31% of serum concentration). IND of LS-SN-38 delayed tumor growth and significantly prolonged animal survival compared with IND of LS-control (p < 0.0001) and LS-CPT-11 (p = 0.003). IND of LS-SN-38 increased the number of TUNEL-positive cells and decreased the Ki-67-positive cells in the brainstem tumor. This study demonstrates that IND of LS-SN-38 bypasses the BBB and enables efficient and noninvasive drug delivery to the brainstem tumor, providing a promising therapeutic approach for treating DIPG.

99P Impact of single-heterozygous UGT1A1 on the clinical outcomes of nano-liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

It is unclear whether the UGT1A1 status, single heterozygous (SH) or wild type (WT), is associated with the efficacy and safety of nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI+5-FU/LV) in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Treatment outcomes of nanoliposomal irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in metastatic and recurrent pancreatic cancer.

To compare the treatment outcomes of nanoliposomal-irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) and modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) as second-line treatment after gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for metastatic and recurrent pancreatic cancer. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV or mFFX after first-line GnP treatment between March 2014 and October 2021 in our hospital. Patient characteristics, treatment outcomes and adverse events were extracted for comparison. Two hundred sixteen patients were included (nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV/mFFX: 50/166). Patients in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group were older, had poorer ECOG PS, and a higher rate of peritoneal metastasis than those in the mFFX group. Median overall survival was 9.5 and 9.8months (P=0.97), respectively, and the median progression-free survival was 4.5 vs 4.8months (P=0.61), respectively. Anorexia, fatigue and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the mFFX group, but there was no difference in grade 3/4 adverse events between the two groups. There was no significant difference in efficacy between nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV and mFFX after GnP. Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV appears to be a viable alternative to mFFX as second-line treatment after GnP.

Phase I trial of Bermekimab with nanoliposomal irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

In this phase I dose-escalation trial, we assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Bermekimab in combination with Nanoliposomal Irinotecan (Nal-Iri) and 5-Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid (5-FU/FA). Secondarily, we investigate effects on weight, lean body mass, quality-of-life, the gut microbiome composition, inflammatory biomarkers, progression-free survival, and overall survival. This was a single-arm, open-label adaptive Bayesian dose-escalation study of Bermekimab combined with Nal-Iri and 5FU/FA in patients with advanced or locally advanced PDAC who failed gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. 22 patients enrolled between 2017 and 2019. 3 of 21 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities attributable to the chemotherapy backbone. 58% (10/17) of patients exhibited weight stability. Physical performance status was preserved among all subjects. Patients reported improvements in quality-of-life metrics via QLQ-PAN26 questioner (−3.6, p = 0.18) and functional well-being (1.78, p = 0.02). Subjects exhibited a decrease in inflammatory cytokines, notably, vascular endothelial growth factor (−0.86, p = 0.017) with Bermekimab. Bermekimab treatment was associated with an increased abundance of gut health-promoting bacterial genera Akkermansia, with 3.82 Log2-fold change from baseline. In sum, Bermekimab is safe to be used in conjunction with Nal-Iri and 5-FU/FA chemotherapy. This benign toxicological profile warrants further Phase I/II investigation of Bermekimab in combinatorial strategies, and the impact of anti-IL-1α antibodies on the gut microbiome.Clinical trials registration: NCT03207724 05/07/2017.

Treatment Effect and Safety of Nanoliposomal Irinotecan with Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid after Gemcitabine-Based Therapy in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study.

Although the combination of nanoliposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/folinic acid (nal-IRI/FF) exhibited survival benefits in gemcitabine-refractory patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) in the phase III NAPOLI-1 trial, there is limited data on the efficacy and safety of this regimen in real-world settings in Japan. This multicenter, prospective observational study enrolled patients with APC who received nal-IRI/FF after a gemcitabine-based regimen from July 2020 to June 2021. We collected and analyzed clinical data and conducted survival and multivariate analyses. Thirty-one (78%) of the 40 patients had metastases. Nal-IRI/FF was the second-line therapy in 36 patients (90%). The median duration was 3.2 months. The disease control rate was 57%. The median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 4.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8–5.5) and 7.4 months (95% CI: 5.1–10.6), respectively. Common ≥grade 3 toxicities included neutropenia (28%) and fatigue (23%). Fatigue led to treatment discontinuation in 6 out of 10 patients. Multivariate analysis showed that a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 4 was a significant risk factor for a short OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.08, 95% CI: 1.21–7.85, p = 0.02). In conclusion, nal-IRI/FF is an appropriate treatment option for APC following gemcitabine-containing regimens.

Clinical Outcomes of S-1 Monotherapy and Modified FOLFIRINOX Therapy after Gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel Therapy in Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Objective S-1 and modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) were often used as the second-line chemotherapies after failure of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in unresectable pancreatic cancer (UPC) until nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin therapy was approved as an alternative in Japan in 2020. However, the clinical outcomes of S-1 and mFFX after GnP have scarcely been reported. Therefore, we retrospectively studied them. Methods We extracted the clinical data of 86 patients with UPC who received second-line chemotherapy after GnP between 2015 and 2020. Among the patients who had a good organ functions and no massive ascites, 41 patients treated with S-1 and 21 treated with mFFX were enrolled. Results Compared to S-1, mFFX tended to be used for younger patients with a good general condition (median age, 63 vs. 71 years, p<0.01; and performance status 0, 67% vs. 37%, p<0.05). The median progression-free and overall survival were similar between the S-1 (3.7 and 7.2 months, respectively) and mFFX (3.3 and 7.4 months, respectively) groups. The response rate in patients with measurable lesions was 4% (n=1/23) in the S-1 group and 17% (n=2/12) in the mFFX group. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 20% in the S-1 group and 57% (neutrophil count decreased in 43%) in the mFFX group (p<0.01). Conclusion S-1 and mFFX were both acceptable second-line chemotherapies after GnP therapy for UPC, although attention should be paid to myelosuppression during mFFX treatment. Further studies involving nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin therapy are necessary to facilitate the selection of the optimal regimen for each patient.

Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Nano-Liposomal Irinotecan and 5-Fluorouracil/L-Leucovorin in Unresectable Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Real-World Study

Introduction: This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of nano-liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/L-leucovorin (5-FU/l-LV) treatment in the second-line or later setting for advanced pancreatic cancer under real-world conditions. Methods: Between June 2020 and September 2021, a total of 44 patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/l-LV in our affiliated hospitals were included. The prognosis, predictive factors (including systemic inflammation-based prognostic indicators), and adverse events were investigated. Results: The median age was 68 (interquartile range 62–73) years old, and 22 patients (50.0%) were male. Concerning tumor factors, 9 patients (20.5%) had local advanced disease and 35 patients (79.5%) had metastases. Twenty-five of the 44 patients were receiving second-line treatment, and 19 were receiving third-line or later treatment. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were 9.0 (range, 0.7–15.4) months and 4.4 (range, 0.6–15.4) months, respectively. The overall response rate was 5.3%. The disease control rate was 44.7%. Patients with a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio of ≥2.7 had a significant risk of a poor OS (HR = 0.275, p = 0.017). Adverse events were manageable, although gastrointestinal symptoms and neutropenia were observed. The most common grade ≥3 adverse event was neutropenia, which was reported in 20% of patients. Conclusions: Nal-IRI + 5-FU/l-LV therapy was considered to be a useful regimen as second-line or later treatment for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer, even in clinical practice.