Nailing Of Fractures Research Articles

383 Assessing Knee Pain Following Intramedullary Nailing for Tibial Shaft Fractures: Retrospective Analysis of Patient Outcomes at Single High Volume Major Trauma Centre

383 Assessing Knee Pain Following Intramedullary Nailing for Tibial Shaft Fractures: Retrospective Analysis of Patient Outcomes at Single High Volume Major Trauma Centre

Comparative Analysis of Infrapatellar and Suprapatellar Nailing Techniques for Tibial Shaft Fractures

Introduction: Tibial shaft fractures pose a significant challenge in orthopaedic practice, often necessitating surgical intervention for optimal recovery. The selection of the entry point for intramedullary nailing, particularly between the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches, remains a debated aspect in fracture management. While both approaches aim to restore stability and function, their nuances influence outcomes and patient experiences. This study aims to comprehensively compare the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches, analyzing surgical techniques, complications, and functional outcomes to inform clinical decision-making. Methodology: A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted on patients undergoing intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures, comparing outcomes between the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches. Data collection included patient demographics, fracture characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Result: Operative time was longer in the infrapatellar group (137.8 minutes) compared to the suprapatellar group (114.4 minutes). The mean radiation dose was higher in the infrapatellar group (74.3 cGY/cm2) and lower in the suprapatellar group (48.5 cGY/cm2). Postoperative outcomes showed a mean Lysholm score of 74 in the infrapatellar group and 90 in the suprapatellar group. one case of infection and one case of malunion were reported in the infrapatellar group, while the suprapatellar group had one infection case but no instances of non-union or malunion. Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the surgical and clinical outcomes of the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches for tibial shaft fractures. While both techniques offer viable options, the suprapatellar approach may offer advantages in terms of operative efficiency and functional recovery.

The "foothill" entry for cephalomedullary nailing in unstable proximal femoral fractures: a technical note with a review of the literature.

Cephalomedullary nailing for unstable proximal femoral fractures is widely utilized, especially for geriatric osteoporotic fractures. There are two starting points for entry, namely trochanteric tip entry and pyriformis fossa entry, both have advantages and disadvantages, the tip of the greater trochanter seems that it is not the ideal starting point for trochanteric entry nails, the study presents the foothill entry point as a reproducible, technically feasible entry point to overcome the shortcoming of both standard starting points, and it could be easy executed with clear intraoperative fluoroscopic landmarks and lead to appropriate nail position without intraoperative complications.

Comparative study of a novel proximal femoral bionic nail and three conventional cephalomedullary nails for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures: a finite element analysis

Comparative study of a novel proximal femoral bionic nail and three conventional cephalomedullary nails for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures: a finite element analysis

Risk factors of poor mid-term shoulder functional outcomes of osteosynthesis using antegrade intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective study with a minimum 5-year follow-up

BackgroundOsteosynthesis using antegrade intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures yields satisfactory bone union rates; however, it may adversely affect postoperative shoulder function. To date, factors affecting mid- or long-term shoulder functional outcomes following intramedullary nail fixation have not been clarified. In this study, we aimed to identify the risk factors for poor mid-term functional outcomes over 5 years postoperatively following antegrade intramedullary nail osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures.MethodsWe retrospectively identified 33 patients who underwent surgery using an antegrade intramedullary nail for acute traumatic humeral shaft fractures and were followed up for at least 5 years postoperatively. We divided the patients into clinical failure and no clinical failure groups using an age- and sex-adjusted Constant score of 55 at the final follow-up as the cutoff value. We compared preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors between the two groups.ResultsFive of the 33 patients had poor shoulder functional outcomes (adjusted Constant score < 55) at a mean follow-up of 7.5 years postoperatively. Proximal protrusion of the nail at the time of bone union (P = 0.004) and older age (P = 0.009) were significantly associated with clinical failure in the univariate analyses. Multivariate analysis showed that proximal protrusion of the nail (P = 0.031) was a risk factor for poor outcomes.ConclusionsThe findings of this study provide new information on predictive factors affecting mid-term outcomes following osteosynthesis using antegrade nails. Our results demonstrated that proximal protrusion of the nail was significantly associated with poor mid-term functional shoulder outcomes. Therefore, particularly in older adults, it is essential to place the proximal end of the intramedullary nail below the level of the articular cartilage.

A Comparative Study of Trochanteric Fractures Treated with Hip Hemiarthroplasty or Proximal Femoral Nail — A Secondary Publication

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of patients treated with partial hip prosthesis (PHP) or double lag screw proximal femoral nailing (PFN) for unstable femoral intertrochanteric region fractures. Material and method: In this study, the data of 101 patients who developed grade 3-4-5 femoral intertrochanteric fractures according to the Evans-Jensen classification between 2019–2020 and were treated with cemented PHP or double screw PFN were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were evaluated in terms of postoperative follow-up time, age, gender, trauma side, American Anesthesia Society Anesthesia Risk Scale (ASA), number of comorbid diseases, total hospitalization time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, duration of surgery, and postoperative complications. Results: 101 patients evaluated within the scope of the study were divided into groups of 51 patients who underwent PHP (Group 1) and 50 patients who underwent PFN (Group 2). When the results were compared in terms of mean length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, amount of intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative 1-year mortality, the results were found to be statistically significant. Conclusion: Our study results showed that the PFN method has clinical advantages over PHP. The PFN technique is a method that can be applied quickly and safely.

Is nail-plate docking worth the effort? A biomechanical analysis of docking a plate and a nail in peri-implant femur fractures.

The ideal treatment of peri-implant femur fractures (PIFFs) remains unclear due to the thin clinical and biomechanical evidence concerning the most suitable form of osteosynthesis. The purpose of the present study was thus to determine the biomechanical stability that results from combining a cephalomedullary nail and a plate for proximal PIFFs, especially when the nail-plate docking technique is applied. Twenty four PIFFs were simulated in both 12 foam and 12 composite specimens and were stabilized via a combination of a cephalomedullary nail and a plate. The control group (n = 6) had a nail and a plate without a connection, while the intervention group (n = 6) had a screw that connected the plate with the interlocking screw hole of the nail, thereby creating a nail-plate docking system. The specimens were evaluated under axial and torsional loading using a material-testing machine and a 3D metrology system. The data regarding stiffness, failure load, and failure displacement showed significantly higher stability for specimens without nail-plate docking. For docked specimens, a non-significant trend toward a higher resistance to torque was observed. Both techniques displayed no significant difference in fracture gap displacement or total displacement. The present study suggests that nail-plate docking of a cephalomedullary nail, and a plate significantly decreases the stiffness and stability of osteosynthesis under axial loading. However, there seems to be a tendency toward higher resistance to torque. Therefore, surgeons should consider this technique if higher torsional stability is necessary, and they should decide against it, if axial stability is preferred.

Trauma

The June 2024 Trauma Roundup360 looks at: Skin antisepsis before surgical fixation of limb fractures; Comparative analysis of intramedullary nail versus plate fixation for fibula fracture in supination external rotation type IV ankle injury; Early weightbearing versus late weightbearing after intramedullary nailing for distal femoral fracture (AO/OTA 33) in elderly patients: a multicentre propensity-matched study; Long-term outcomes with spinal versus general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery; Operative versus nonoperative management of unstable medial malleolus fractures: a randomized clinical trial; Impact of smoking status on fracture-related infection characteristics and outcomes; Reassessing empirical antimicrobial choices in fracture-related infections; Development and validation of the Nottingham Trauma Frailty Index (NTFI) for older trauma patients.

Tip-apex distance as a risk factor for cut-out in cephalic double-screw nailing of intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Proximal femur fractures treatment can involve anterograde nailing with a single or double cephalic screw. An undesirable failure for this fixation is screw cut-out. In a single-screw nail, a tip-apex distance (TAD) greater than 25 mm has been associated with an increased risk of cut-out. The aim of the study was to examine the role of TAD as a risk factor in a cephalic double-screw nail. A retrospective study was conducted on 112 patients treated for intertrochanteric femur fracture with a double proximal screw nail (Endovis BA2; EBA2) from January to September 2021. The analyzed variables were age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, fracture type, side, time of surgery, quality of reduction, pre-existing therapy with bisphosphonate for osteoporosis, screw placement in two different views, and TAD. The last follow-up was at 12 months. Logistic regression was used to study the potential factors of screw cut-out, and receiver operating characteristic curve to identify the threshold value. A total of 98 of the 112 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 65 patients were female (66.3%), the mean age was 83.23 years (SD 7.07), and the mean follow-up was 378 days (SD 36). Cut-out was observed in five patients (5.10%). The variables identified by univariate analysis with p < 0.05 were included in the multivariate logistic regression model were screw placement and TAD. The TAD was significant with an odds ratio (OR) 5.03 (p = 0.012) as the screw placement with an OR 4.35 (p = 0.043) in the anteroposterior view, and OR 10.61 (p = 0.037) in the lateral view. The TAD threshold value identified was 29.50 mm. Our study confirmed the risk factors for cut-out in the double-screw nail are comparable to those in the single screw. We found a TAD value of 29.50 mm to be associated with a risk of cut-out in double-screw nails, when good fracture reduction is granted. This value is higher than the one reported with single-screw nails. Therefore, we suggest the role of TAD should be reconsidered in well-reduced fractures treated with double-screw intramedullary nail.

Does double distal locking reduce non-union rates in intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fracture?

IntroductionIntramedullary nailing is one of the surgical treatments for humeral shaft fracture. Non-union is a common complication, with rates of 10–20%. The objective of this study was to compare non-union in humeral shaft fractures treated by intramedullary nailing with double distal locking, single distal locking or no locking. HypothesisNailing with double distal locking decreases non-union rates compared to single or no locking. Material and methodsThis single-center retrospective comparative study included 87 patients with closed humeral shaft fracture without neurologic deficit treated by anterograde intramedullary nailing: group 1 (double locking): 15 fractures; group 2 (single locking): 63 fractures; group 3 (no locking): 9 fractures. Non-union was defined as absence of radiographic callus at 6 months without clinical pain. The primary endpoint was non-union rate per group. The secondary endpoints were Constant score at 6 months, and postoperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). ResultsThere were no significant differences in non-union rate: 20.0% in group 1, 20.3% in group 2, and 0% in group 3 (p=0.32). Constant score at 6 months was significantly different between the 3 groups (p=0.01). Group 2 used more NSAIDs than the other groups (39.1% vs. 20.0% in group 1 and 33.3% in group 3; p=0.37). DiscussionNon-union rates were similar regardless of distal locking for closed humeral shaft fractures without neurologic deficit treated by intramedullary nailing. Nevertheless, patients in the double locking group had higher Constant scores at 6 months, probably related to greater stability of fixation, allowing more efficient rehabilitation. Level of evidenceIII; retrospective comparative study.

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Intramedullary Nailing of Oncologic Impending or Pathologic Fractures With Carbon Fiber or Titanium Implant.

Despite the benefits of intramedullary nailing (IMN) of impending or pathologic fractures in oncologic patients, literature on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is scarce in patients treated with carbon fiber (CF) nails. Our study compared postoperative PROs after IMN with CF or titanium implants. We conducted a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of patients treated at our institution with CF or titanium nails for impending or pathologic fractures from metastatic bone disease. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Short Form (SF) Physical, Mental, and Physical Function 10a scores were collected. Pain was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS). Absolute and differential scores were compared between groups. We included 207 patients, 51 treated with CF and 156 with titanium nails. One month postoperatively, patients had a one-point decrease in the pain VAS score while PROMIS scores did not improve. At 3 months, PROMIS SF Physical and SF 10a scores improved from preoperative values. Six months postoperatively, median PROMIS SF Physical, SF Mental, and SF 10a scores were higher than preoperative scores. Absolute and differential PROMIS and pain VAS scores were similar between groups at the 6-month and 1-year marks. Patient-reported outcomes were similar after intramedullary nailing with either CF or titanium implants.

Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing in Length Stable Versus Unstable Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Comparison of Clinical, Radiographic, and Pedobarographic Outcomes.

Pediatric diaphyseal femoral fracture (PDFF) is one of the most common injuries requiring hospitalization. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is commonly used for PDFFs in ages 5 to 11. The optimal treatment method for length unstable PDFF is a subject of ongoing debate. This study aimed to compare clinical, radiographic, and pedobarographic outcomes of ESIN between length stable and unstable PDFF. We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing ESIN treatment for isolated PDFF between 2016 and 2021. Exclusion criteria were (1) history of ipsilateral or contralateral lower extremity fractures, (2) highly comminuted or segmental fractures, (3) body weight >50kg, and (4) comorbidities affecting bone quality, range of motion, or neurologic status. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to length stability. Clinical, radiographic, and pedobarographic data were then assessed to compare groups. Twenty-five patients were included (17 length stable and 8 length unstable PDFF) with a mean age of 73.6±17.8 months. There was no significant difference between groups in age, side of injury, body weight, follow-up duration, and nail-canal diameter ratio. Mean deformity in the fracture site in the early postoperative x-rays was not significantly different between groups ( P =0.661). After a mean follow-up of 27.8±14.2 months (range, 12-67), there was no significant difference in mechanical axis deviation, distal femur joint orientation angle, or limb-length discrepancy in both groups. The pedobarographic assessment revealed that the length unstable group had a significantly higher external foot progression angle in the injured extremity (9.8°±6.9° vs. 1.3°±5.6°, P =0.031). However, the length stable group had no significant difference in the foot progression angle (4.9°±5° vs. 3°±4.3°, P =0.326). There was no significant difference in either group for other pedobarographic parameters. ESIN is a safe and effective option for length-unstable PDFF, yet attention should be paid to the rotational alignment. Although significant external rotation deformity occurs in length-unstable PDFF, it has no implications for the other pedobarographic parameters. Level IV.

Regional anesthesia is safe for use in intramedullary nailing of low-energy tibial shaft fractures

The purpose was to compare perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent general or regional anesthesia for intramedullary (IM) nailing of tibial shaft fractures (TSFs). Retrospective chart review was performed on a consecutive series of low-energy TSF patients who presented to a single academic medical center and a level 1 trauma center who underwent operative repair with a reamed IM nail. Collected information included demographics, injury information, anesthesia type (general or regional i.e. peripheral nerve block), intra-operative opiate consumption (converted to morphine milliequivalents [MME], and post-operative pain visual-analog scale [VAS] pain scores. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the type of anesthesia received and univariate analysis was performed to compare the 3 groups. Seventy-six patients were included, with an average age of 44.47±16.0 years. There were 38 (50 %) who were administered general anesthesia and 38 (50 %) who were administered regional anesthesia in the form of a peripheral nerve block. There were no differences between the groups with respect to demographics, medical co-morbidities, rate of open fractures or AO/OTA fracture classification. Regional anesthesia patients received less intra-operative MME than general anesthesia patients (17.57±10.6, 28.96±13.8, p < 0.001). Patients who received regional anesthesia also spent less time in the operating room, received less MME on post-operative day 1, and ambulated further on post-operative day 1, however none of these differences were statistically significant. There were no cases of missed post-operative compartment syndrome or complications related to the administration of the peripheral nerve block. Regional anesthesia in TSF surgery received less intra-operative opioid requirements, without any untoward effects. Therapeutic Level III.

Comparison of mortality rates and risk factors for mortality between proximal femoral nailing and bipolar hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures

Comparison of mortality rates and risk factors for mortality between proximal femoral nailing and bipolar hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures

Relationship Between Surgery Timing and Hidden Blood Loss in Proximal Femoral Nailing of Pertrochanteric Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Relationship Between Surgery Timing and Hidden Blood Loss in Proximal Femoral Nailing of Pertrochanteric Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Study of the Healing of Tibial Fractures Treated with Dynamic Intramedullary Nailing

Background: Dynamic nailing by placing only one screw on one side of the nail shortens the surgical time and reduces the complications during surgery and secondary dynamization. This study aimed to investigate the healing of dynamic intramedullary nailing (IMN) of tibial fractures. Methods: This cross-sectional study was done on 67 patients with dynamic IMN in 5th Azar Hospital, Gorgan, Iran, in 2015-2018. Complications, union time, Radiographic Union Score of Tibia Fracture (RUST) score, and Johner-Wruhs criteria were analyzed based on their grouping in AO classification. Results: The average age of the patients was 33.2 ± 13.0 years. Most of the fractures were closed type (71.6%), type C (43.4%). The mean healing time was 14.62 ± 4.38 weeks and RUST score was 8.90 ± 1.26. There was no significant difference between locations of fracture and the healing time or RUST score (P &gt; 0.05). The healing time in the comminuted fractures (e.g., type C) and open tibial fractures was statistically longer than the simpler type (e.g., type A or B) and the mean radiological score in type C fractures was significantly lower (P &lt; 0.05). The mean Johner-Wruhs criteria score of fractures was 46.31 ± 4.49, so that 61 patients had excellent results, four patients had good results, and two patients had fair results. Conclusion: Dynamic IMN of closed and middle third tibial fractures and simpler types of fractures (e.g., type A or B) have faster healing. Nevertheless, it is better to be more cautious for fixation of open or comminuted fracture (e.g., type C).

BACTERIAL CULTURES AND OUTCOME OF INTRAMEDULLARY INTERLOCKING NAIL IN OPEN DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURES OF TIBIAL

Background: The tibial shaft is one of the most common open long bone fractures; treatment improperly can lead to many serious complications and frequently cause permanent sequelae. Infection is one of the most common and disastrous complications of an open fracture. Therefore, determining the role of qualitative bacterial cultures in implementing the most effective antibiotics for opening tibial fractures and managing promptly and with precision is extremely important to avoid these complications and restore the patient's rehabilitation. Due to the paucity of articles exclusively dealing with this topic, we conducted a study to determine bacterial cultures and the functional outcome of intramedullary interlocking nailing in these patients. Objectives: This study assessed Bacterial cultures and the outcome of intramedullary interlocking nails in open diaphyseal fractures of the tibial. Materials and Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 32 patients with open diaphyseal fractures of tibial who were initially treated with thorough wound debridement and lavage, followed by surgical treatment with intramedullary interlocking nails. The qualitative method of antibiotic disc diffusion in agar (Kirby Bauer) is often applied to determine the susceptibility of bacteria to different antibiotics. All 32 patients were followed up, which was conducted using clinical criteria, and a radiographic was assessed using the RUST score. Results: In our study, the injury surgery interval was 14.54±6.304 hours. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epiderdimis were common bacteria in open tibial fractures. The mean union time was 15.43±3.726 weeks, which was assessed by RUST score and clinical criteria. The functional outcome with Ketenjian and Shelton Criteria was excellent results in 28 (87.5%) cases and good outcomes in 4 (12.5%) cases. Conclusion: Using the intramedullary interlocking nail in open diaphyseal fractures of the tibial is an excellent procedure that leads to good results with reduced hospital stay, good range of motion, and low infection rate, leading to better union.

Implants removal in children: results of a survey among Italian orthopaedic surgeons.

In the treatment of paediatric limb disorders, the use of metal implants has been increasing over the last decades. Recent studies have addressed the decision of orthopaedic surgeons regarding the removal of implants after the treatment of fracture, and there is a growing consensus within the scientific community supporting the choice of not removing implants in children. This survey aimed to investigate the rationale behind the Italian orthopaedic community's decision regarding metal implant removal in paediatric patients. An electronic questionnaire was sent to all members of the Italian Paediatric Orthopaedic and Traumatology Society, Italian Orthopaedic and Traumatology Society, Italian Club of Osteosynthesis, and South Italy Society of Orthopaedic and Traumatology. The survey comprised 34 questions about hardware removal after the treatment of long bone fractures, epiphyseal growth plate injuries, slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), and flat foot. Of the 3500 orthopaedic surgeons who received the questionnaire, 5.5% responded. The leading indications for implant removal were the patient's intolerance, pain, ROM limitations, and hardware breakage. Removal of elastic nails for long bone fractures, cannulated screws for growth plate injuries, and SCFE and screws for arthroereisis for flat foot correction were analysed in detail. The consensus among Italian Orthopaedic Surgeons is to remove elastic nails and cannulated screws in cases of pain, intolerance, or breakage and to reduce further risks during patient growth. An increasing number of physicians, however, are endorsing and advocating the growing trend in the literature of not routinely removing the hardware.

Does the Subtalar or Tibiotalar Joint Need Fused in Primary Retrograde Tibiotalocalcaneal Nailing for Fragility Ankle Fractures?

As an alternative to traditional open reduction internal fixation of ankle fragility fractures, primary retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing has been investigated as a treatment option. These results suggest that this treatment is an acceptable alternative treatment option for these injuries. There are still questions about the need for formal joint preparation at the subtalar or tibiotalar joint when performing primary TTC nailing for fragility fractures. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 32 patients treated with primary retrograde TTC nail without subtalar or tibiotalar joint preparation for a mean of 2.4 years postoperatively. We specifically reviewed the charts for nail breakages at either joint, patients developing subtalar or tibiotalar joint pathology requiring additional treatment, including return to the operating room for formal joint preparation. Fracture union occurred in 100% of patients. There were 3 cases (10.0%) of hardware failure, and 2 of these cases were asymptomatic and did not require any treatment. One patient (3.3%) developed hardware failure with nail breakage at the subtalar joint. This patient developed progressive pain and symptoms requiring revision surgery with formal arthrodesis of the subtalar and tibiotalar joint. This study shows that retrograde hindfoot nailing without formal subtalar or tibiotalar joint preparation is an acceptable potential treatment option in ankle fragility fractures. Mid-term follow-up demonstrates favorable outcomes without the need for formal joint preparation in this high-risk population. Comparative studies with higher patient numbers and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the results of this study.Levels of Evidence: Level IV.

Is immediate weight bearing safe for subtrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients treated by cephalomedullary nailing? A multicentric study in one hundred eighty-two patients.

Biomechanical superiority of intramedullary nails over extramedullary implants has been proved for subtrochanteric fractures. Nevertheless, postoperative management of these patients has not changed, with high rates of protected weight-bearing after intramedullary nailing. The purpose of this study is to determine the mechanical complications of immediate postoperative full weigh-bearing for subtrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients treated with a cephalomedullary nail. We performed a retrospective case series study from patients treated with a cephalomedullary nail for subtrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31A.3 and 32A-32C) over a nine-year period. Patients in the immediate full weight-bearing (IFWB) group received orders for immediate full weight bear as tolerated on postoperative 48h. Patients in the non- or limited- weight-bearing (NLWB) group received orders not to full weight bear in the immediate postoperative. There were five (2.7%) cases of implant failure including four cutouts and one nail breakage that needed a reoperation. Of them, one (2.2%) followed the NLWB protocol and four (2.9%) followed the IFWB protocol. Mean length of stay was 7.9days (median 8, range 3-21) in the NLWB group and 10.7days (median 8, range 2-60) in the IWBAT group. The NLWB group observed a 2.8-day shorter postoperative length of stay when compared to the IFWB, but the median remained equal. This study suggests that geriatric patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated by intramedullary nailing and in which a good fracture reduction was achieved, may be able to tolerate immediate postoperative full weight-bearing, not increasing reoperation rates due to implant failure.