For many years, undergraduate students at the National University of “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy” are offered the optional course “Analytic of Myth.” It involves a study of the philosophy of mythology (that is, a conceptual understanding of the specifics of mythical thinking) at various stages of its development. Currently, among the available sources, materials on the development of relevant reflections during the Middle Ages are generally lacking. In the limited information remaining from the Soviet and first post-Soviet years, there are significant inaccuracies. This applies to the specific attitude to myth, which can be found in the “Bibliotheca” of the famous Byzantine scholar, philosopher, theologian, statesman, and clergyman of the 9th century Photios I of Constantinople (Photios the Great). Not pretending to reproduce the views of this thinker in their entirety and with maximum historical and philological authenticity, this essay only intends to fill in the gaps and correct mistakes about Photios and his era precisely in philosophy of mythology context. In the past, there was a widespread rumour that medieval authors used to refer to ancient mythology solely for the purpose of discrediting it. This essay proves, supported by various examples, that Photios rather opted for a wider reading of ancient mythology. It involved not only harsh criticism, but also a certain acknowledgement of relevant literature by discovering there several artistical, aesthetical, linguistic, stylistic, historical, cultural, educational, and moral advantages. Even though Photios’ attitude to ancient mythology formed within the framework of Christian religious tradition, it is deeply consonant with both pre-Christian culture and progress of science. On the one hand, the understanding of ancient mythology in “Bibliotheca” can be considered as a manifestation of the renaissance of ancient culture typical for Byzantium during the times of Photios (he himself was one of the leading representatives of this renaissance). On the other hand, Photios’ criticism of ancient myths can be considered not only as an example of struggle between Christianity and pagan mythology, but also as a continuation of a special intellectual trend that originates in antiquity and can be described by the formula “from myth to logos.”
Read full abstract