Monomeric Myosin Research Articles

The Structural Basis for the Large Powerstroke of Myosin VI

Due to a unique addition to the lever arm-positioning region (converter), class VI myosins move in the opposite direction (toward the minus-end of actin filaments) compared to other characterized myosin classes. However, the large size of the myosin VI lever arm swing (powerstroke) cannot be explained by our current view of the structural transitions that occur within the myosin motor. We have solved the crystal structure of a fragment of the myosin VI motor in the structural state that represents the starting point for movement on actin; the pre-powerstroke state. Unexpectedly, the converter itself rearranges to achieve a conformation that has not been seen for other myosins. This results in a much larger powerstroke than is achievable without the converter rearrangement. Moreover, it provides a new mechanism that could be exploited to increase the powerstroke of yet to be characterized plus-end-directed myosin classes.

Myo4p is a monomeric myosin with motility uniquely adapted to transport mRNA

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae uses two class V myosins to transport cellular material into the bud: Myo2p moves secretory vesicles and organelles, whereas Myo4p transports mRNA. To understand how Myo2p and Myo4p are adapted to transport physically distinct cargos, we characterize Myo2p and Myo4p in yeast extracts, purify active Myo2p and Myo4p from yeast lysates, and analyze their motility. We find several striking differences between Myo2p and Myo4p. First, Myo2p forms a dimer, whereas Myo4p is a monomer. Second, Myo4p generates higher actin filament velocity at lower motor density. Third, single molecules of Myo2p are weakly processive, whereas individual Myo4p motors are nonprocessive. Finally, Myo4p self-assembles into multi-motor complexes capable of processive motility. We show that the unique motility of Myo4p is not due to its motor domain and that the motor domain of Myo2p can transport ASH1 mRNA in vivo. Our results suggest that the oligomeric state of Myo4p is important for its motility and ability to transport mRNA.

Structures of Smooth Muscle Myosin and Heavy Meromyosin in the Folded, Shutdown State

Remodelling the contractile apparatus within smooth muscle cells allows effective contractile activity over a wide range of cell lengths. Thick filaments may be redistributed via depolymerisation into inactive myosin monomers that have been detected in vitro, in which the long tail has a folded conformation. Using negative stain electron microscopy of individual folded myosin molecules from turkey gizzard smooth muscle, we show that they are more compact than previously described, with heads and the three segments of the folded tail closely packed. Heavy meromyosin (HMM), which lacks two-thirds of the tail, closely resembles the equivalent parts of whole myosin. Image processing reveals a characteristic head region morphology for both HMM and myosin, with features identifiable by comparison with less compact molecules. The two heads associate asymmetrically: the tip of one motor domain touches the base of the other, resembling the blocked and free heads of this HMM when it forms 2D crystals on lipid monolayers. The tail of HMM lies between the heads, contacting the blocked motor domain, unlike in the 2D crystal. The tail of whole myosin is bent sharply and consistently close to residues 1175 and 1535. The first bend position correlates with a skip in the coiled coil sequence, the second does not. Tail segments 2 and 3 associate only with the blocked head, such that the second bend is near the C-lobe of the blocked head regulatory light chain. Quantitative analysis of tail flexibility shows that the single coiled coil of HMM has an apparent Young's modulus of about 0.5 GPa. The folded tail of the whole myosin is less flexible, indicating interactions between the segments. The folded tail does not modify the compact head arrangement but stabilises it, indicating a structural mechanism for the very low ATPase activity of the folded molecule.

The power stroke of myosin VI and the basis of reverse directionality

Myosin VI supports movement toward the (-) end of actin filaments, despite sharing extensive sequence and structural homology with (+)-end-directed myosins. A class-specific stretch of amino acids inserted between the converter domain and the lever arm was proposed to provide the structural basis of directionality reversal. Indeed, the unique insert mediates a 120 degrees redirection of the lever arm in a crystal structure of the presumed poststroke conformation of myosin VI [Ménétrey J, Bahloul A, Wells AL, Yengo CM, Morris CA, Sweeney HL, Houdusse A (2005) Nature 435:779-785]. However, this redirection alone is insufficient to account for the large (-)-end-directed stroke of a monomeric myosin VI construct. The underlying motion of the myosin VI converter domain must therefore differ substantially from the power stroke of (+)-end-directed myosins. To experimentally map out the motion of the converter domain and lever arm, we have generated a series of truncated myosin VI constructs and characterized the size and direction of the power stroke for each construct using dual-labeled gliding filament assays and optical trapping. Motors truncated near the end of the converter domain generate (+)-end-directed motion, whereas longer constructs move toward the (-) end. Our results directly demonstrate that the unique insert is required for directionality reversal, ruling out a large class of models in which the converter domain moves toward the (-) end. We suggest that the lever arm rotates approximately 180 degrees between pre- and poststroke conformations.

Physical Integrity of Smooth Muscle Myosin Filaments is Enhanced by Phosphorylation of the Regulatory Myosin Light Chain

Background and Aims: Smooth muscle myosin monomers self-assemble in solution to form filaments. Phosphorylation of the 20-kD regulatory myosin light chain (MLC20) enhances filament formation. It is not known whether the phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated filaments possess the same structural integrity. Methods: We purified myosin from bovine trachealis to form filaments, in ATP-containing zero-calcium solution during a slow dialysis that gradually reduced the ionic strength. Sufficient myosin light chain kinase and phosphatase, as well as calmodulin, were retained after the myosin purification and this enabled phosphorylation of MLC20 within 20-40s after addition of calcium to the filament suspension. The phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated filaments were then partially disassembled by ultrasonification. The extent of filament disintegration was visualized and quantified by atomic force microscopy. Results: MLC20 phosphorylation reduced the diameter of the filaments and rendered the filaments more resistant to ultrasonic agitation. Electron microscopy revealed a similar reduction in filament diameter in intact smooth muscle when the cells were activated. Conclusion: Modification of the structural and physical properties of myosin filaments by MLC20 phosphorylation may be a key regulation step in smooth muscle where formation and dissolution of the filaments are required in the cells’ adaptation to different cell length.

Regulatory and catalytic domain dynamics of smooth muscle myosin filaments.

Domain dynamics of the chicken gizzard smooth muscle myosin catalytic domain (heavy chain Cys-717) and regulatory domain (regulatory light chain Cys-108) were determined in the absence of nucleotides using saturation-transfer electron paramagnetic resonance. In unphosphorylated synthetic filaments, the effective rotational correlation times, tau(r), were 24 +/- 6 micros and 441 +/- 79 micros for the catalytic and regulatory domains, respectively. The corresponding amplitudes of motion were 42 +/- 4 degrees and 24 +/- 9 degrees as determined from steady-state phosphorescence anisotropy. These results suggest that the two domains have independent mobility due to a hinge between the two domains. Although a similar hinge was observed for skeletal myosin (Adhikari and Fajer (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 9643-9647. Brown et al. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 8283-8291), the latter displayed higher regulatory domain mobility, tau(r)= 40 +/- 3 micros, suggesting a smooth muscle specific mechanism of constraining regulatory domain dynamics. In the myosin monomers the correlation times for both domains were the same (approximately 4 micros) for both smooth and skeletal myosin, suggesting that the motional difference between the two isoforms in the filaments was not due to intrinsic variation of hinge stiffness. Heavy chain/regulatory light chain chimeras of smooth and skeletal myosin pinpointed the origin of the restriction to the heavy chain and established correlation between the regulatory domain dynamics with the ability of myosin to switch off but not to switch on the ATPase and the actin sliding velocity. Phosphorylation of smooth muscle myosin filaments caused a small increase in the amplitude of motion of the regulatory domain (from 24 +/- 4 degrees to 36 +/- 7 degrees ) but did not significantly affect the rotational correlation time of the regulatory domain (441 to 408 micros) or the catalytic domain (24 to 17 micros). These data are not consistent with a stable interaction between the two catalytic domains in unphosphorylated smooth muscle myosin filaments in the absence of nucleotides.

The Predicted Coiled-coil Domain of Myosin 10 Forms a Novel Elongated Domain That Lengthens the Head

Myosin 10 contains a region of predicted coiled coil 120 residues long. However, the highly charged nature and pattern of charges in the proximal 36 residues appear incompatible with coiled-coil formation. Circular dichroism, NMR, and analytical ultracentrifugation show that a synthesized peptide containing this region forms a stable single alpha-helix (SAH) domain in solution and does not dimerize to form a coiled coil even at millimolar concentrations. Additionally, electron microscopy of a recombinant myosin 10 containing the motor, the three calmodulin binding domains, and the full-length predicted coiled coil showed that it was mostly monomeric at physiological protein concentration. In dimers the molecules were joined only at their extreme distal ends, and no coiled-coil tail was visible. Furthermore, the neck lengths of both monomers and dimers were much longer than expected from the number of calmodulin binding domains. In contrast, micrographs of myosin 5 heavy meromyosin obtained under the same conditions clearly showed a coiled-coil tail, and the necks were the predicted length. Thus the predicted coiled coil of myosin 10 forms a novel elongated structure in which the proximal region is a SAH domain and the distal region is a SAH domain (or has an unknown extended structure) that dimerizes only at its end. Sequence comparisons show that similar structures may exist in the predicted coiled-coil domains of myosins 6 and 7a and MyoM and could function to increase the size of the working stroke.

Species-specific thermal denaturation pattern of fish myosin when heated as myofibrils as studied by myosin subfragment-1 and rod denaturation rates

Thermal denaturation of myofibrils from various species of fish was investigated by measuring ATPase inactivation, myosin aggregation, myosin subfragment-1 (S-1) and rod denaturation rates as studied by chymotryptic digestion. Decrease in monomeric myosin (myosin aggregation) was always faster than the ATPase inactivation for all myofibrils tested. The relative denaturation rate of rod to that of S-1 differed from species to species. Preceded denaturation of rod was observed with some species, and the opposite was true with other species. The denaturation pattern was explained by the different magnitude of S-1 stabilization by F-actin in myofibrils at low salt medium. Myofibrils which receive a great stabilization by F-actin as studied by ATPase inactivation showed the preceded rod denaturation pattern, and vice versa. S-1 portion, not F-actin, determined the different stabilization of S-1 by F-actin in myofibrils.

Myosin VI: cellular functions and motor properties

Myosin VI has been localized in membrane ruffles at the leading edge of cells, at the trans-Golgi network compartment of the Golgi complex and in clathrin-coated pits or vesicles, indicating that it functions in a wide variety of intracellular processes. Myosin VI moves along actin filaments towards their minus end, which is the opposite direction to all of the other myosins so far studied (to our knowledge), and is therefore thought to have unique properties and functions. To investigate the cellular roles of myosin VI, we identified various myosin VI binding partners and are currently characterizing their interactions within the cell. As an alternative approach, we have expressed and purified full-length myosin VI and studied its in vitro properties. Previous studies assumed that myosin VI was a dimer, but our biochemical, biophysical and electron microscopic studies reveal that myosin VI can exist as a stable monomer. We observed, using an optical tweezers force transducer, that monomeric myosin VI is a non-processive motor which, despite a relatively short lever arm, generates a large working stroke of 18 nm. Whether monomer and/or dimer forms of myosin VI exist in cells and their possible functions will be discussed.

Myosin VI: a multifunctional motor

Myosin VI moves towards the minus end of actin filaments unlike all the other myosins so far studied, suggesting that it has unique properties and functions. Myosin VI is present in clathrin-coated pits and vesicles, in membrane ruffles and in the Golgi complex, indicating that it has a wide variety of functions in the cell. To investigate the cellular roles of myosin VI, we have identified a variety of myosin VI-binding partners and characterized their interactions. As an alternative approach, we have studied the in vitro properties of intact myosin VI. Previous studies assumed that myosin VI existed as a dimer but our biochemical characterization and electron microscopy studies reveal that myosin VI is a monomer. Using an optical tweezers force transducer, we showed that monomeric myosin VI is a non-processive motor with a large working stroke of 18 nm. Potential roles for myosin VI in cells are discussed.

Monomeric myosin anchoring

A monomeric myosin first spotted in electron micrographs almost 30 years ago has finally been united with a proposed function. Tyska and Mooseker (page 395) report that myosin-1A associates with and anchors a raft component in apical membranes. Figure Expression of a dominant-negative myosin-1A (green) results in loss of apical SI (red). Myosin-1A was previously thought to shuttle Golgi-derived cargos to the plasma membrane (after most of the distance had been covered using microtubule-based motors). But the in vitro evidence for this came from undifferentiated cells, and in mature, polarized colon epithelial cells, Tyska and Mooseker see no evidence of shuttling by myosin-1A. What they did spot was cofractionation and cross-linking of myosin-1A with the transmembrane disaccharidase sucrase-isomaltase (SI). This raft protein is lost from the apical surface when a fragment of either myosin-1A or SI interferes with the link between the two full-length proteins. Thus, myosin-1A may serve as an anchor, with the clustering of SI in rafts helping to secure the link even if an individual myosin-1A lets go. The link appears to be specific as other raft proteins—which probably come and go between different rafts—are not affected by the dominant-negative constructs. Tyska is now determining whether the myosin-1A–SI link is regulated by signaling proteins or bacterial toxins. ▪

A monomeric myosin VI with a large working stroke.

Myosin VI is involved in a wide variety of intracellular processes such as endocytosis, secretion and cell migration. Unlike almost all other myosins so far studied, it moves towards the minus end of actin filaments and is therefore likely to have unique cellular properties. However, its mechanism of force production and movement is not understood. Under our experimental conditions, both expressed full-length and native myosin VI are monomeric. Electron microscopy using negative staining revealed that the addition of ATP induces a large conformational change in the neck/tail region of the expressed molecule. Using an optical tweezers-based force transducer we found that expressed myosin VI is nonprocessive and produces a large working stroke of 18 nm. Since the neck region of myosin VI is short (it contains only a single IQ motif), it is difficult to reconcile the 18 nm working stroke with the classical 'lever arm mechanism', unless other structures in the molecule contribute to the effective lever. A possible model to explain the large working stroke of myosin VI is presented.

Identification and phylogenetic analysis of Drosophila melanogaster myosins.

Myosins constitute a superfamily of motor proteins that convert energy from ATP hydrolysis into mechanical movement along the actin filaments. Phylogenetic analysis currently places myosins into 17 classes based on class-specific features of their conserved motor domain. Traditionally, the myosins have been divided into two classes depending on whether they form monomers or dimers. The conventional myosin of muscle and nonmuscle cells forms class II myosins. They are complex molecules of four light chains bound to two heavy chains that form bipolar filaments via interactions between their coiled-coil tails (type II). Class I myosins are smaller monomeric myosins referred to as unconventional myosins. Now, at least 15 other classes of unconventional myosins are known. How many myosins are needed to ensure the proper development and function of eukaryotic organisms? Thus far, three types of myosins were found in budding yeast, six in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, and at least 12 in human. Here, we report on the identification and classification of Drosophila melanogaster myosins. Analysis of the Drosophila genome sequence identified 13 myosin genes. Phylogenetic analysis based on the sequence comparison of the myosin motor domains, as well as the presence of the class-specific domains, suggests that Drosophila myosins can be divided into nine major classes. Myosins belonging to previously described classes I, II, III, V, VI, and VII are present. Molecular and phylogenetic analysis indicates that the fruitfly genome contains at least five new myosins. Three of them fall into previously described myosin classes I, VII, and XV. Another myosin is a homolog of the mouse and human PDZ-containing myosins, forming the recently defined class XVIII myosins. PDZ domains are named after the postsynaptic density, disc-large, ZO-1 proteins in which they were first described. The fifth myosin shows a unique domain composition and a low homology to any of the existing classes. We propose that this is classified when similar myosins are identified in other species.

Kinetic characterization of the weak binding states of myosin V.

Myosin V is a molecular motor shown to move processively along actin filaments. We investigated the properties of the weak binding states of monomeric myosin V containing a single IQ domain (MV 1IQ) to determine if the affinities of these states are increased as compared to conventional myosin. Further, using a combination of non-hydrolyzable nucleotide analogues and mutations that block ATP hydrolysis, we sought to probe the states that are populated during ATP-induced dissociation of actomyosin. MV 1IQ binds actin with a K(d) = 4 microM in the presence of ATP gamma S at 50 mM KCl, which is 10-20-fold tighter than that of nonprocessive class II myosins. Mutations within the switch II region trapped MV 1IQ in two distinct M.ATP states with very different actin binding affinities (K(d) = 0.2 and 2 microM). Actin binding may change the conformation of the switch II region, suggesting that elements of the nucleotide binding pocket will be in a different conformation when bound to actin than is seen in any of the myosin crystal structures to date.

Myosin light chain phosphorylation facilitates in vivo myosin filament reassembly after mechanical perturbation.

Phosphorylation of the 20-kDa regulatory myosin light chain (MLC) of smooth muscle is known to cause monomeric myosins in solution to self-assemble into thick filaments. The role of MLC phosphorylation in thick filament formation in intact muscle, however, is not clear. It is not known whether the phosphorylation is necessary to initiate thick filament assembly in vivo. Here we show, by using a potent inhibitor of MLC kinase (wortmannin), that the MLC phosphorylation and isometric force in trachealis muscle could be abolished without affecting calcium transients. By measuring cross-sectional densities of the thick filaments electron microscopically, we also show that inhibition of MLC phosphorylation alone did not cause disassembly of the filaments. The unphosphorylated thick filaments, however, partially dissolved when the muscle was subjected to oscillatory strains (which caused a 25% decrease in the thick filament density). The postoscillation filament density recovered to the preoscillation level only when wortmannin was removed and the muscle was stimulated. The data suggest that in vivo thick filament reassembly after mechanical perturbation is facilitated by the cyclic MLC phosphorylation associated with repeated stimulation.

Influence of calcium on myosin thick filament formation in intact airway smooth muscle.

Myosin thick filaments have been shown to be structurally labile in intact smooth muscles. Although the mechanism of thick filament assembly/disassembly for purified myosins in solution has been well described, regulation of thick filament formation in intact muscle is still poorly understood. The present study investigates the effect of resting calcium level on thick filament maintenance in intact airway smooth muscle and on thick filament formation during activation. Cross-sectional density of the thick filaments measured electron microscopically showed that the density increased substantially (144%) when the muscle was activated. The abundance of filamentous myosins in relaxed muscle was calcium sensitive; in the absence of calcium (with EGTA), the filament density deceased by 35%. Length oscillation imposed on the muscle under zero-calcium conditions produced no further reduction in the density. Isometric force and filament density recovered fully after reincubation of the muscle in normal physiological saline. The results suggest that in airway smooth muscle, filamentous myosins exist in equilibrium with monomeric myosins; muscle activation favors filament formation, and the resting calcium level is crucial for preservation of the filaments in the relaxed state.

Velocity of actomyosin sliding in vitro is reduced in dystrophic mouse diaphragm.

It has recently been suggested that dystrophin deficiency in mdx diaphragm muscle is associated with quantitative changes in the myosin molecular motor. In vitro motility assays were used to study the kinetics of actomyosin interactions between purified actin filaments and myosin molecules. Monomeric myosin was obtained from the diaphragm and limb (semitendinosus) muscles of 9-mo-old male mdx (mdx) and age-matched control mice. The sliding velocity (vo, microm/s) of fluorescent-labeled actin filaments moving over a myosin-coated surface (40 microg/ml) was measured. In diaphragm, vo was significantly slower in mdx than in control mice (1.2 +/- 0.1 microm s(-1) versus 1.9 +/- 0.1 microm s(-1), p < 0.001). Conversely, there was no significant difference in vo between control and mdx semitendinous muscles (2.4 +/- 0.1 microm s(-1) versus 2.5 +/- 0.1 micro(-1)). As compared with control mice, mdx diaphragm exhibited a shift from IIX-MHC to IIA-MHC (p < 0.001) and a reduction in IIB-MHC (p < 0.01). Semitendinous muscle from control and mdx mice contained almost exclusively type IIB MHC. Our results are in good agreement with the proposal that myosin is altered in dystrophic mouse diaphragm.

Myosin monomer density and exchange in synthetic thick filaments investigated using fluorescence microscopy with single molecule sensitivity

The number of myosin molecules in synthetic thick filaments, prepared by dialysis at 0.12 M NaCl and pH 7.0, was estimated to be between 400 and 800 molecules per micrometre under conditions appropriate for in vitro motility assays. This estimate was based on a number count of Cy3-labelled myosin molecules incorporated into filaments at a nominal ratio of 1:1000. At this dilution, single fluorescent spots were resolved corresponding to individual labelled myosins. The spots usually bleached with a one- or two-step profile but, in around 30% of the cases, fluctuations were observed indicating that additional photophysical or photochemical events had occurred. Myosin molecules were shown to exchange between filaments in suspension on a time-scale of several hours at 4 degrees C, but the reaction was only 75% complete after 48 h, suggesting a non-exchangeable core. However, myosin exchange does not appear to be the predominant source of the fluctuations in fluorescence intensity in the single molecule assays.

Calmodulin kinase II chimeras used to investigate the structural requirements for smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase autoinhibition and calmodulin-dependent activation.

Segments of the autoregulatory domain of MK, a catalytically active fragment of the monomeric smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase (smMLCK) (residues 472-972), were replaced with their counterparts from a homologous but multimeric enzyme, calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaM KII). Chimeric proteins in which both the autoregulatory and oligomerization domains of CaM KII (residues 281-478) were substituted for residues 781-972 of smMLCK, MK(CK281-478), or only the autoregulatory domain of CaM KII (residues 281-315) was exchanged for residues 781-813 of smMLCK, MK(CK281-315), exhibited significant enzymatic activity in the absence of Ca(2+)/CaM. In contrast, both MK and a chimeric protein in which the C-terminal half of the autoregulatory domain of smMLCK was replaced with CaM KII residues 301-315, MK(CK301-315), were inactive in the absence of Ca(2+)/CaM. These results indicate that the sequence of the N-terminal half of the autoregulatory domain of smMLCK is important for complete autoinhibition of its enzymatic activity. All proteins bound to Ca(2+)/CaM, and the chimeric proteins MK(CK281-478) and MK(CK281-315) were activated by Ca(2+)/CaM with activation constants (K(CaM)) and maximal enzymatic activities comparable to those of the wild-type MK enzyme. This demonstrates that the entire autoregulatory domain of CaM KII can replace that of smMLCK in its ability to promote efficient CaM-dependent activation of the smMLCK enzyme. However, the inability of the chimeric protein MK(CK301-315) to be activated by Ca(2+)/CaM suggests that replacement of only the C-terminal half of the autoregulatory domain of smMLCK, while still retaining the ability to bind Ca(2+)/CaM, also substitutes residues that prevent activation of the enzyme by Ca(2+)/CaM.

Kinetic Characterization of a Monomeric Unconventional Myosin V Construct

An expressed, monomeric murine myosin V construct composed of the motor domain and two calmodulin-binding IQ motifs (MD(2IQ)) was used to assess the regulatory and kinetic properties of this unconventional myosin. In EGTA, the actin-activated ATPase activity of MD(2IQ) was 7.4 +/- 1.6 s(-1) with a K(app) of approximately 1 microM (37 degrees C), and the velocity of actin movement was approximately 0.3 micrometer/s (30 degrees C). Calcium inhibited both of these activities, but the addition of calmodulin restored the values to approximately 70% of control, indicating that calmodulin dissociation caused inhibition. In contrast to myosin II, MD(2IQ) is highly associated with actin at physiological ionic strength in the presence of ATP, but the motor is in a weakly bound conformation based on the pyrene-actin signal. The rate of dissociation of acto-MD(2IQ) by ATP is fast (>850 s(-1)), and ATP hydrolysis occurs at approximately 200 s(-1). The affinity of acto-MD(2IQ) for ADP is somewhat higher than that of smooth S1, and ADP dissociates more slowly. Actin does not cause a large increase in the rate of ADP release, nor does the presence of ADP appreciably alter the affinity of MD(2IQ) for actin. These kinetic data suggest that monomeric myosin V is not processive.