Myelodysplasia-related Changes Research Articles

Genetic Characteristics According to Subgroup of Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes.

Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) includes heterogeneous conditions such as previous history and specific cytogenetic and morphological properties. In this study, we analyze genetic aberrations using an RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel assay in 45 patients with AML-MRC and detect 4 gene fusions of KMT2A-SEPT9, KMT2A-ELL, NUP98-NSD1, and RUNX1-USP42 and 81 somatic mutations. Overall, all patients had genetic aberrations comprising of not only cytogenetic changes, but also gene fusions and mutations. We also demonstrated several characteristic genetic mutations according to the AML-MRC subgroup. TP53 was the most commonly mutated gene (n = 11, 24%) and all were found in the AML-MRC subgroup with myelodysplastic syndrome-defining cytogenetic abnormalities (AML-MRC-C) (p = 0.002). These patients showed extremely poor overall survival not only in AML-MRC, but also within the AML-MRC-C subgroup. The ASXL1 (n = 9, 20%) and SRSF2 (n = 7, 16%) mutations were associated with the AML-MRC subgroup with >50% dysplasia in at least two lineages (AML-MRC-M) and were frequently co-mutated (55%, 6/11, p < 0.001). Both mutations could be used as surrogate markers to diagnose AML-MRC, especially when the assessment of multilineage dysplasia was difficult. IDH1/IDH2 (n = 13, 29%) were most commonly mutated in AML-MRC, followed by CEBPA (n = 5, 11%), PTPN11 (n = 5, 11%), FLT3 (n = 4, 9%), IDH1 (n = 4, 9%), and RUNX1 (n = 4, 9%). These mutations were not limited in any AML-MRC subgroup and could have more significance as a risk factor or susceptibility marker for target therapy in not only AML-MRC, but also other AML categories.

Outcomes of TP53‐mutated AML with evolving frontline therapies: Impact of allogeneic stem cell transplantation on survival

Outcomes of <scp><i>TP53</i></scp>‐mutated <scp>AML</scp> with evolving frontline therapies: Impact of allogeneic stem cell transplantation on survival

Morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular genetic comparison study in patients with clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance, myelodysplastic syndrome, and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes: A single institution experience.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis showed clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) as an immediate precursor to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We evaluated and compared morphologic, multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC), and molecular genetic findings in patients with CCUS (n=37), MDS (n=75), and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC, n=24). CCUS patients showed variable MFC abnormalities including >2% CD34+ myeloblasts (5.8%), altered antigen expression on myeloblasts, monocytes, and granulocytes (1.2, 1.5, and 0.2/case), abnormal maturation of myeloblasts (45.8%), decreased hematogones (17.6%), and decreased side scatter (SSC) of granulocytes (11.4%). CCUS patients with high-risk mutations showed significantly more MFC abnormalities. However, CCUS patients with >20% variant allelic fraction (VAF) did not show more MFC aberrations than the rest of the group. MDS patients showed significantly more MFC abnormalities compared with CCUS patients (p=7.8E-05-0.047). Low-grade MDS patients showed significantly fewer MFC abnormalities compared with high-grade MDS or AML-MRC patients (p=1.89E-05-0.04). AML-MRC patients showed significantly elevated blast counts, more antigen aberrations, decreased hematogones, and decreased SSC of granulocytes compared with CCUS patients (p=2.0E-05-0.01). CCUS patients carried predominantly TET2/DNMT3A/ASXL1 mutations. They harbored fewer mutations in gene coding splicing factors compared with MDS patients (p=.0001-.02) and fewer mutations in tumor suppressor and transcription factor genes compared with AML-MRC patients (p=.0006-.02). CCUS is an immediate precursor to low-grade MDS. The progression from CCUS to MDS to AML-MRC is a stepwise process that requires acquisition of mutations in splicing, transcription factor, and tumor suppressor genes with accumulations of additional MFC abnormalities.

Azacitidine, intensive chemotherapy or best supportive care in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia, a DATAML registry study

We analyzed 526 consecutive acute myeloid leukemia patients refractory to or relapsing after chemotherapy. 270 patients received intensive salvage chemotherapy (IC), 97 azacitidine (AZA) and 159 best supportive care (BSC). Complete response was obtained in 37/19/0% (p = .0008). Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT) was performed in 39.3/10.3/0%. Median overall survival (OS) and 5-year OS were 8.2/9.6/2.2 months and 16/6/2% (p < .0001). Predictive factors of worse OS were post-myelodysplastic/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, bone marrow blasts ≥20%, adverse cytogenetics, AZA cycle ≥2 and no alloSCT at R/R for AZA and age, performance status, white blood cell count and myelodysplasia-related changes for IC. The impact of treatment was time-dependent: adjusted hazard ratio for OS was in favor of AZA up to 1 month, was not different between 1 and 7 months, then was in favor of IC after 7 months. While AZA represents a therapeutic option for the oldest patients, it does not lead to long-term survivors.

Acute Myleoid Leukaemia t(8:21)- A Close Differential Diagnosis to Myelodysplastic Syndrome with Excess Blasts 2: A Case Report

Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) with t(8;21) (q22;22) is a distinct, rare type of AML, generally occurs in young patients which has a favorable prognosis. It is found in approximately 5% cases of all AML. This translocation (8;21) usually correlates with specific morphological features which include large blasts with Auer rods and large Pseudo-Chediak-Higashi granules in neutrophils. These features are also seen in myelodysplasia related changes, hence should be differentiated as the latter have worse prognosis. Detection of chromosomal abnormalities by cytogenetics is very important for risk stratification and prognosis. Hence, authors reports a very unusual case of AML t(8;21) in a 32-year-old female patient presented with features of Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) with Excess Blasts-2.

POSB413 Demographic Characteristics and Disease Subtypes of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia across Large Community Health Systems in the US

Community health systems (CHSs) treat over 50% of patients with cancer across the US. The profile of patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) seen in CHSs within the US are not widely published. This analysis describes the demographic characteristics and disease subtypes of patients with AML treated across a sample of CHSs. A retrospective analysis was performed utilizing the Syapse Learning Health Network (SLHN), an electronic medical record (EMR) derived database that collects cancer care data from multiple care settings that make up the US CHSs across 33 states, 450+ hospitals and 1,900+ community employed oncologists. Patients aged >18 yo at AML diagnosis from January 1, 2010 - June 22, 2021 were identified from the SLHN using ICD-10 codes. APL was deliberately excluded. Data elements were derived from both structured and unstructured sources, via direct integrations and Certified Tumor Registrars, respectively, and are descriptively summarized. 1,001 patients from the SLHN were included in the analysis. Patient demographics included: median age of 69 years at AML diagnosis; 46% female and 54% male; 78% White, 9% Black, 2% Asian, 11% other/unknown; 4% of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. According to WHO Classification, 36% of patients were classified at diagnosis as AML with myelodysplasia related changes, 21% were AML Not Otherwise Specified (NOS), 18% were classified as therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, and 8% were AML with recurrent genetic mutations. Patients with AML treated in CHSs within the SLHN were elderly, white and skewed slightly more male, with a relatively high percentage of patients having myelodysplastic features. Further evaluation is needed to assess whether the real world group of patients with AML and myelodysplasia has a worse outcome.

Noncoding RNAs and Their Response Predictive Value in Azacitidine-treated Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Myelodysplasia-related Changes.

Prediction of response to azacitidine (AZA) treatment is an important challenge in hematooncology. In addition to protein coding genes (PCGs), AZA efficiency is influenced by various noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), including long ncRNAs (lncRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and transposable elements (TEs). RNA sequencing was performed in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia before AZA treatment to assess contribution of ncRNAs to AZA mechanisms and propose novel disease prediction biomarkers. Our analyses showed that lncRNAs had the strongest predictive potential. The combined set of the best predictors included 14 lncRNAs, and only four PCGs, one circRNA, and no TEs. Epigenetic regulation and recombinational repair were suggested as crucial for AZA response, and network modeling defined three deregulated lncRNAs (CTC-482H14.5, RP11-419K12.2, and RP11-736I24.4) associated with these processes. The expression of various ncRNAs can influence the effect of AZA and new ncRNA-based predictive biomarkers can be defined.

Patients with AML-MRC benefit from decitabine in combination with low-dose G-CSF, cytarabine and aclarubicin: A single center cohort study

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) are insensitive to conventional chemotherapy and, therefore, have a poor prognosis. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of low-dose decitabine in combination with small-dose CAG regimen (D-CAG regimen) in treating AML-MRC, a total of 80 patients with newly diagnosed AML-MRC from September 2015 to January 2020 in our center were included in the study. Amongst these patients, 43 and 37 patients received two courses of the D-CAG and CAG regimens, respectively. The complete remission (CR) and complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) rate in the D-CAG group was higher than that of the CAG group (62.2% vs. 48.8%, P = 0.013). Among patients with less than 9 months of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) history and poor karyotypes, the (CR+CRi) rate of the D-CAG group was statistically higher than that of the CAG group. Except for patients receiving hematopoietic cell transplantation, among patients with less than 9 months of MDS history, the D-CAG group showed a better probability of overall survival than the CAG group did. In conclusion, patients with AML-MRC may benefit from the D-CAG regimen as an induction therapy, especially patients with less than 9 months of MDS history or with poor karyotypes.

Comparison of Hospital Length of Stay and Supportive Care Utilization Between Patients Treated with CPX-351 and 7+3 for Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes.

PurposeCPX-351 is dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine at a fixed synergistic 1:5 molar ratio. This study determined current real-world use of CPX-351 versus conventional 7+3 (cytarabine+daunorubicin) therapy and evaluated hospital length of stay (LOS) and supportive care utilization in t-AML and AML-MRC.Patients and MethodsThis retrospective, observational study utilized the Premier Healthcare Database and included patients who were aged ≥18 years with t-AML or AML-MRC and treated with CPX-351 or 7+3 between August 1, 2017 and February 28, 2019. All patients treated with 7+3 were required to be eligible for CPX-351 based on its FDA-approved indication. Outcome variables were annualized and adjusted for patient, hospital, and clinical confounding factors. The primary outcome was inpatient LOS. Secondary outcomes included use of blood products and use of anti-infectives.ResultsThe study included 195 qualifying patients treated with CPX-351 and 160 patients treated with 7+3 who were eligible for CPX-351. Approximately one-third of the patients treated with CPX-351 were administered therapy in a hospital-based outpatient setting, and all patients treated with 7+3 received it in the inpatient setting. The regression-adjusted annualized inpatient LOS was shorter with CPX-351 than 7+3 (mean of 183.7 vs 197.1 days, p<0.001). The difference in mean-adjusted LOS was most pronounced for t-AML, with a mean-adjusted LOS of 168.9 versus 192.5 days for CPX-351 versus 7+3, respectively (nominal p<0.001). Supportive care utilization, including the number of administrations of red blood cells, the number of administrations of platelets, and the number of days on anti-infectives, was similar between treatment groups.ConclusionCPX-351 was associated with a shorter inpatient LOS than 7+3. Supportive care use, including blood products and anti-infectives, was similar for CPX-351 and 7+3. These findings suggest CPX-351 conveys resource advantages over 7+3 in patients with newly diagnosed t-AML and AML-MRC.

Clinical and Cytogenetical Characteristics in Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes

To explore the clinical and cytogenetic characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) based on morphology define. A total of 180 newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed, and marrow cell morphology of 126 patients were re-evaluated. The clinical and cytogenetic characteristics, including ages, sex, WBC count, HGB level, PLT count, blasts percentage, abnormal karyotype detection rate of the patients in AML with multilineage dysplasia (AML-MRC-1), secondary AML from myelodysplastic/ myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) (AML-MRC-2), and AML not otherwise specified (AML-NOS) groups were investigated. There was no significant differences between the patients in three groups in terms of sex, age and platelet count (P=0.898, P=0.365, P=0.853), but AML-MRC-2 group (73.2%) was higher than AML-MRC-1 (60.0%) and AML-NOS (56.4%) in the percentages of patients over 60 years old (P=0.228); there were statistically significant differences on WBC count, HGB level, and blasts percentage (P=0.000, P=0.022, P=0.000, AML-MRC-2<AML-MRC-1<AML-NOS). Abnormal karyotypes rate were 59.2% in AML-MRC patients, among which complex karyotypes and myelodysplasia-related cytogenetic abnormalities accounted for 49.3%, and 5q- was the most common (28.2%), followed by 7q-/-7 (19.1%), 17p-/-17 (14.1%), +8 (14.1%), and 20q- (12.7%). Cytogenetic abnormalities rate were compared between the patients in the three groups, the result showed that AML-MRC-2 group (73.2%) was higher than AML-MRC-1 group (40.0%) and AML-NOS group (25.4%) (P=0.000). Complex karyotypes and myelodysplasia-related abnormalities were the main abnormalities in AML-MRC-2 and AML-MRC-1 group, the percentages of complex karyotypes of the patients in the two groups showed statistically significant (41.5% vs 16.7%, P=0.026), while the percentages of other myelodysplasia-related abnormalities showed no statistically significant (17.1% vs 20.0%, P=0.753). Morphological reassessment of bone marrow cell dysplasia is crucial to the differential diagnoses between AML-MRC (defined only by morphological changes of multilineage dysplasia) and AML-NOS. And the detection rate of cytogenetic abnormalities that mainly consisted of complex karyotypes and myelodysplasia-related abnormalities was higher in AML-MRC patients.

The WHO 2016 diagnostic criteria for Acute Myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia related changes (AML-MRC) produce a very heterogeneous entity: A retrospective analysis of the FAB subtype RAEB-T

We studied 79 patients with AML-MRC or RAEB-T, who were later reclassified according to the WHO classification. Marrow slides were examined cytomorphologically with regard to dysplasia. Patients were followed up until March 2020. Thirty-one patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (median survival (ms) 16 months), 14 were treated with induction chemotherapy (ms 8.4 months), 18 received hypomethylating agents (ms 9.2 months), 16 received low dose chemotherapy or best supportive care (ms 2.4 months). Only 30.4 % fulfilled the morphologic WHO criteria. 46.8 % were classified as AML-MRC by an antecedent MDS, 54.4 % of the pts were classified by MDS-related chromosomal abnormalities. 5 % did not fulfill any of the criteria and were entered based on 20–29 % medullary blasts. There was no difference in ms between pts presenting with > 50 % dysplasia as compared to pts with dysplasia between 10 % and 50 % (ms 9.1 vs 9.9 months, p = n.s.) or for pts with antecedent MDS (ms 9.1 vs 8.9 months, p = n.s.). Myelodysplasia-related cytogenetic abnormalities were associated with a worse outcome (ms 8.1 vs 13.5 months, p = 0.026).AML-MRC in its current definition is a heterogenous entity. Dysplasia of ≥ 50 % in ≥ two lineages is not helpful for diagnostics and prognostication and therefore should be deleted in future classifications. We recommend utilizing the WHO guidelines for defining dysplasia (10 % or greater in ≥ 1 of the three myeloid cell lines) assisting in establishing the diagnosis of MDS.

Real-World Study of CPX-351 Treatment Outcomes for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in England

Introduction: CPX-351 (US: Vyxeos ®; Europe: Vyxeos ® Liposomal) is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine in a synergistic 1:5 molar ratio. Since November 2018, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recommended its use for adults with newly diagnosed, therapy-related AML (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) due to either prior myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or de novo AML with myelodysplasia-related cytogenetic changes. The key aims of this study were to utilize the Cancer Analysis System (CAS) database available through the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) to describe the demographics and clinical characteristics of adults with AML in England who have received CPX-351, as well as to estimate overall survival (OS) and survival within stratifications of interest.Methods: The NCRAS systematically collects and curates population-level data about cancer diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes across England. Adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with AML and treated with CPX-351 were included in this study. A diagnosis of t-AML or AML-MRC between January 2013 and March 2020 was determined either directly using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3) codes or indirectly using non-specific ICD-O-2, ICD-O-3, or ICD-10 AML codes in combination with either prior systemic anticancer therapy or radiotherapy (t-AML) or a prior diagnosis of MDS or CMML (AML-MRC; other AML-MRC subtypes could not be specifically identified and are included within the de novo AML subgroup). OS was measured from the date of diagnosis; a separate analysis of OS landmarked from the date of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) was also performed. Within this preliminary analysis, no OS adjustments have been made to account for any COVID-19-related deaths.Results: A total of 172 patients with AML who were treated with CPX-351 were identified: 37 (22%) had t-AML, 57 (33%) had AML-MRC, and 78 (45%) had de novo AML. At diagnosis, the mean (standard deviation) age was 62.8 years (10.1), with 49/172 (28%) patients aged <60 years; 66% of patients were male; 87% were white; and most had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 (68%). Six (3%) patients had received azacitidine treatment for a prior malignancy. To date, 43/172 (25%) patients had undergone HCT overall, including 43/97 (44%) patients with ≥3 months of follow-up.The cut-off date for OS was December 31, 2020, giving a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 11.2 months (3.6, 16.9). Overall, 91 patients had died, with an estimated median OS (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 16.6 months (11.0, not estimable) and probability of survival (95% CI) at 1 and 2 years of 0.54 (0.47, 0.62) and 0.39 (0.30, 0.50), respectively (Figure 1). Early mortality rates were 7% at 30 days and 15% at 60 days. When OS was landmarked from the date of HCT, median OS was not reached, with a probability of survival (95% CI) at 1 year of 0.74 (0.62, 0.89; Figure 2). When stratified by age, estimated median OS (95% CI) was not reached for patients aged <60 years and 12.8 months (8.9, 17.6) for patients aged ≥60 years. In a treatment patterns analysis that evaluated second-line treatments after CPX-351, 68 patients died without salvage therapy and 64 were alive without receiving subsequent therapy by the end of the study period. The most common salvage treatments were fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (FLAG-Ida; n = 15), daunorubicin plus cytarabine (DA)-based therapy (n = 6), and azacitidine alone (n = 7). Of the 43 patients who received an HCT, 6 (14%) underwent HCT following salvage therapy.Conclusions: This is the largest study to date examining the real-world outcomes for patients with AML who were treated with CPX-351. The estimated median OS of 16.6 months is consistent with reported real-world outcomes for CPX-351 in French and Italian studies. Median OS has not been reached in patients aged <60 years or when landmarked from the date of HCT. Once the CAS database has been updated, these analyses will be repeated to increase follow-up and patient numbers and to determine the impact of COVID-19 on OS following CPX-351 treatment. [Display omitted] DisclosuresLegg: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Doubleday: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Reich: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Lambova: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Medalla: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Day 14 Measurable Residual Disease As a Predictor of Post-Induction Response in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

INTRODUCTIONSeveral studies have shown that morphological remission at day 14 is a predictor of post-induction response in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing an intensive treatment. However, the role of measurable residual disease (MRD) by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) at day 14 remains unknown. The aim of our study is to explore the role of MRD at day 14 and its association with outcomes of patients with AML undergoing an intensive treatment.METHODSWe conducted a retrospective study in adult patients with newly a diagnosed AML in our center between 2007 and 2020. Adult patients who received intensive chemotherapy, excluding those with an acute promyelocytic leukemia, were included. Bone marrow aspiration was performed at day 14 after induction to assess morphological response and MRD by MFC. Early blast clearance (EBC) was defined as <5% of blasts and negative MRD was defined as <0.1% abnormal cells within mononucleated cells by MFC. Day 14 aspiration findings were compared with clinical data. This study was approved by our Institutional Ethics Committee. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 24.RESULTSA total of 131 patients were analyzed. Median age was 55.6 years (IQR 42.3-64.2). The most frequent AML subtype was AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (34.4%), followed by NPM1-mutated AML (32.1%). The most commonly used induction regimen was “7+3” (96.2%) (Table 1).On day 14 bone marrow aspiration, median cellularity was 0.5/5 (IQR 0.5-1). 107 patients (81.7%) showed a blast reduction >50% compared to diagnosis and 87 patients (66.4%) had less than 5% of blasts. In this latter group, 28.6% of patients had a positive MRD and 71.4% had a negative MRD. NPM1-mutated AML showed the highest EBC rates while AML with myelodysplasia-related changes had the lowest rates (83.3% versus 55.5%; p=0.04). Furthermore, there were statistically significant differences in EBC rates based on the 2017 European Leukemia Net risk stratification, with 80% of EBC in low risk, 66.6% in intermediate risk and 53.4% in high risk AML (p=0.038). No differences were observed in MRD at day 14 based on AML subtypes or risk stratification.We subsequently analyzed the negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV) of day 14 bone marrow aspiration results by morphology and MFC to predict post-induction results. As a predictor of post-induction CR, day 14 EBC had a NPV of 82% and a PPV of 69%, while day 14 MRD had a NPV of 86% and a PPV of 49%. However, for predicting post-induction MRD, day 14 EBC had a NPV of 49% and a PPV of 15%, while day 14 MRD had a NPV of 71% and PPV of 74%.The correlation between day 14 and post-induction bone marrow aspiration is shown in Table 2. Bivariate analysis showed that achieving CR with negative MRD in post-induction bone marrow aspiration was associated with EBC (p<0.001) and negative MRD (p=0.04) at day 14 bone marrow aspiration. No statistically significances were observed based on marrow cellularity. A multivariate analysis using logistic regression showed that negative MRD by MFC at day 14 was the only independent predictor variable to achieve post-induction CR with negative MRD (OR 4.95% CI 1.0-15.9; p=0.04).CONCLUSIONPatients showing EBC with negative MRD on day 14 bone marrow aspiration are more likely to achieve post-induction CR with negative MRD, with day 14 MRD by MFC being the only independent factor able to predict post-induction CR with negative MRD in our cohort. However, further prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings. [Display omitted] DisclosuresMartín-Rojas: Celgene-BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kwon: Novartis, Celgene, Gilead, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria.

A Pilot Study of CPX-351 (Vyxeos ©) for Transplant Eligible, Higher Risk Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome

A Pilot Study of CPX-351 (Vyxeos ©) for Transplant Eligible, Higher Risk Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Safety and Efficacy of CPX-351 in Younger Patients < 60 Years Old with Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An Updated Analysis

Safety and Efficacy of CPX-351 in Younger Patients < 60 Years Old with Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An Updated Analysis

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of AML Patients Treated with Frontline CPX 351 or HMA/Venetoclax: A Single Institution's Experience

Introduction: Treatment options for newly diagnosed patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have historically been limited. The combination of a hypomethylating agent and venetoclax (HMA/Ven) has emerged as standard of care treatment for elderly and/or unfit pts with newly diagnosed AML. Liposomal cytarabine/daunorubicin (CPX-351) has also become standard of care therapy for pts with AML with myelodysplasia related changes or therapy-related AML. Despite being an intensive regimen, CPX-351 may have a more favorable toxicity profile compared to other intensive regimens. As a result, CPX-351 may be offered to older fit pts who may not have been candidates for traditional induction regimens. As the landscape for frontline treatment options evolves, there are now overlapping pt populations who may be eligible for either frontline treatment option. A retrospective study that included clinical trial pts demonstrated similar response rates in pts treated with HMA/Ven and CPX-351 (Asghari Blood 2019). Similarly, a study of secondary AML pts receiving HMA/Ven and CPX-351 showed no difference in remission rate or survival (Salhotra Am J Hematol 2021). There remains a shortage of data describing clinical characteristics of pts selected for and treated with standard-of-care HMA/Ven and CPX-351. We present a study on our center's experience.Methods: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult pts with newly diagnosed AML who were treated with either CPX-351 or HMA/Ven as initial therapy. Consecutive pts treated with either of these two induction therapies between August 2017 and June 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. Pts were eligible for response evaluation if they received at least 3 doses of CPX-351 or 28 days (1 cycle) of venetoclax (“response cohort”). All pts treated with CPX-351 or HMA/Ven were included in survival analysis (“survival cohort”). Response assessment is based on ELN-2017 criteria. Pt characteristics were described and compared using Fisher's Exact tests. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to summarize overall survival, and log-rank tests were used for the comparison of frontline therapies. Cox proportional-hazards regression estimated hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and interactions between frontline therapy and age at induction start.Results: A total of 79 pts were identified receiving frontline HMA/Ven or CPX-351; 61 pts (77%) were evaluable for response. Of the response cohort, 21 (34%) were treated with CPX-351 and 40 (66%) with HMA/Ven; pt characteristics are described in Table 1. CPX-351 pts were younger at start of induction (P<0.001); many pts in both treatment groups had unfavorable ELN risk scores at diagnosis (CPX 43%, HMA/Ven 41%; P>0.99). 33% and 23% of the HMA/Ven cohort achieved CR and CRi respectively; in the CPX-351 cohort 57% and 5% achieved CR and CRi respectively. A greater fraction of CPX-351 pts proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant than HMA/Ven pts (67% vs 23%; P<0.001). No differences were detected in achievement of MRD negativity by flow cytometry (P=0.51) or molecular profile (P=0.52).Median follow-up for all pts was 18.9 months; 42 deaths occurred. Differences in survival between the frontline therapies were not detected in the survival cohort (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.67 to 2.57; P=0.43) nor the response cohort (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.45 to 2.09; P=0.93); these results were unaffected by adjustments for age at induction, ELN risk score, and transplant status.8 pts who initially received CPX-351 and had refractory disease later went on to receive HMA/Ven reinduction; 2 achieved CRi, 2 MLFS, 3 Refractory and 1 Death in Aplasia. 1 pt who initially received HMA/Ven with refractory disease went on to receive CPX-351. This pt was refractory to CPX-351.Conclusion: HMA/Ven and CPX-351 are effective frontline treatment options with similar response rates and survival outcomes in newly diagnosed adults with AML. Pts treated with CPX-351 were younger and more likely to proceed with allogeneic transplantation, in line with standard practice. Though there was heterogeneity in pt populations, age did not appear to affect outcomes. As the landscape for standard-of-care upfront treatment for AML continues to evolve, further studies are warranted to determine optimal therapy selection and sequencing. [Display omitted] DisclosuresArnall: Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau. Symanowski: Carsgen: Consultancy; Immatics: Consultancy, Other: DSMB Member; Eli Lilly: Consultancy, Other: DSMB Member. Avalos: JUNO: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Copelan: Amgen: Consultancy. Grunwald: Cardinal Health: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; PRIME: Other; Karius: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Med Learning Group: Other; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy; MDEdge: Other; PER: Other; Trovagene: Consultancy; Stemline: Consultancy.

A Phase 1 Study Evaluating ASTX727 (decitabine and cedazuridine) and Venetoclax Combination Therapy in Newly Diagnosed AML Patients Unfit for Intensive Induction Chemotherapy

A Phase 1 Study Evaluating ASTX727 (decitabine and cedazuridine) and Venetoclax Combination Therapy in Newly Diagnosed AML Patients Unfit for Intensive Induction Chemotherapy

Palbociclib and Ponatinib Suppress Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Patient-Derived Xenograft

Aims: Palbociclib, a breast cancer approved CDK4/6 inhibitor, and ponatinib, a BCR/ABL1 inhibitor with a multi-kinase activity approved for chronic myeloid and acute lymphoid leukemia, were previously shown to be effective in vitro against acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here, we aimed to test this effect in a patient-derived xenograft model.Methods: Two newly diagnosed AMLs (AML #1: myelomonocytic AML, intermediate cytogenetic risk; AML #2: AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, poor cytogenetic risk) were xenotransplanted into NOD SCID gamma mice. Treatment was initiated at detection of approximately 5-20% hCD45+ cells in mouse peripheral blood (PB). Palbociclib, ponatinib, vehicle, and venetoclax as a comparative treatment, were administered orally for 3 weeks, 5 days per week. Chemotherapy (cytarabine+doxorubicine, AraC/Dox) 5+3 regimen served as a positive control. Azacitidine served as another comparative drug and was administered subcutaneously, five days per week in 3 cycles - 1 week on, 1 week off.Results: Significant reduction of disease burden and prolongation of overall survival (OS) were seen with palbociclib and the reference treatment venetoclax in both AMLs, and with chemotherapy in AML#1 (Fig. 1). Ponatinib prolonged OS in AML#1 but failed to provide reduction of disease burden in PB. Interestingly, azacitidine induced the longest remission (<1% hCD45+ cells in PB), for almost 10 weeks, but only in 2/4 mice for AML#2. Treatment toxicity manifested by weight decrease was only seen with chemotherapy (AML#1: 24% weight loss, p = 0.0001; AML#2: 19% loss, p = 0.04), and was also accompanied with early mouse mortality in 3/4 mice for AML#2. None of the tested treatments lead to complete AML eradication and a gradual relapse was seen in PB. The AML infiltration was higher in bone marrow than in spleen at final analysis at relapse (AML#1, 83 vs 73% of hCD45+ cells, mean, p = 0.02; AML#2, 95 vs 65%, p = 0.0001). No changes in AML phenotype were observed between treated and vehicle mice in case of AML#1, except for azacitidine which decreased monocyte (SSCdim, CD45high; 94 vs 96%, mean, p = 0.03), CD34+ (2 vs 5%, p = 0.01) and primitive CD34+CD38- cell (0.1 vs 0.3%, p = 0.005) percentages. For AML#2, blast (SSClow, CD45dim) percentage compared to vehicle (70%) was decreased by chemotherapy (24%, p = 0.01) and increased by venetoclax (80%, p = 0.03) and azacitidine (87%, p = 0.03); monocytes (6% for vehicle) were decreased by chemotherapy (1%, p = 0.004), venetoclax (3%, p = 0.01), and azacitidine (0%, p = 0.008); CD34+ cells were increased by venetoclax (59 vs 39%, p = 0.02).Summary: Palbociclib, and partially ponatinib, demonstrated AML suppression in vivo. This encourages further investigation of their efficacy in different AML subtypes and in combination with other drugs.Funding: Supported by MUNI/A/1595/2020. [Display omitted] DisclosuresMayer: AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Outcomes of Patients with AML Treated with CPX-351 Based on the 2017 ELN Risk Stratification

Outcomes of Patients with AML Treated with CPX-351 Based on the 2017 ELN Risk Stratification

Real-World Study of the Treatment Patterns of Patients Diagnosed with Therapy-Related AML or AML-MRC in England between 2013 and 2020 Using the Cancer Analysis System Database

Introduction: Patients with therapy-related AML (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) are a known high-risk AML subgroup with historically poor outcomes. In December 2018, CPX-351 (Vyxeos ® Liposomal) received a positive reimbursement decision in England for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed t-AML or AML-MRC. The objective of this retrospective study was to utilize the Cancer Analysis System (CAS) database available through the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) to describe the demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment pathways for patients with t-AML or AML-MRC in England from 2013 to 2020, including the use of CPX-351.Methods: The NCRAS systematically collects and curates population-level data about cancer diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes across England. Adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with t-AML or AML-MRC between January 2013 and March 2020 were identified either directly using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition(ICD-O-3) codes or indirectly using non-specific ICD-O-2, ICD-O-3, or ICD-10 AML codes in combination with a record of prior systemic anticancer therapy or radiotherapy (t-AML) or a prior diagnosis of MDS or CMML (AML-MRC; other AML-MRC subtypes could not be distinguished from de novo AML). First-line and second-line treatments identified included clinical trials, intensive chemotherapy (IC) treatments (CPX-351; daunorubicin plus cytarabine [DA]; fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor [FLAG-Ida]; or “other IC” consisting of mitoxantrone-based therapy or high-dose cytarabine alone), or less-intensive therapies (azacitidine, low-dose cytarabine [LDAC], or hydroxycarbamide alone). Patients who did not receive active systemic therapy (ie, those who received best supportive care alone) were not included.Results: A total of 2,891 patients with t-AML or AML-MRC were identified. Most patients were male (62%), white (91%), and aged ≥60 years (80%). Overall, 590 (20%) patients received first-line treatment in a clinical trial, 1,474 (51%) received less-intensive therapy, and 827 (29%) received an IC regimen. Patients aged ≥60 years at diagnosis were less likely than those aged <60 years to either enter a clinical trial (18% vs 32%, respectively) or receive IC (22% vs 54%). In patients treated with IC, those who received CPX-351 were slightly older (mean [standard deviation] age: 63.9 years [8.3]) than those who received DA (60.5 years [11.4]) or FLAG-Ida (55.6 years [12.6]); 28% of patients treated with CPX-351 were aged <60 years compared to 37% for DA and 55% for FLAG-Ida.When treatment patterns were analyzed per annum, utilization of less-intensive therapies remained stable over time (Figure 1A). Azacitidine was the most common less-intensive therapy both overall (64%) and across all yearly time points, followed overall by LDAC (22%) then hydroxycarbamide alone (14%). In contrast, the IC treatment patterns were more dynamic over time (Figure 1B). DA chemotherapy was the most common IC overall (48%), followed by FLAG-Ida (23%) and other ICs (18%). However, CPX-351 uptake started in 2018 (5% of all IC) and by the end of 2019 had displaced DA chemotherapy as standard-of-care IC (40% vs 22%, respectively). Excluding patients who were alive but had not received subsequent therapy (ie, censored), most patients who received front-line azacitidine or LDAC died without receiving salvage therapy (89% and 92%, respectively). In comparison, non-censored patients who received front-line DA chemotherapy or FLAG-Ida were more likely to receive salvage treatment (52% and 34%, respectively). Key salvage treatments following DA included azacitidine alone and FLAG-based therapy. Key salvage treatments following front-line CPX-351 included FLAG-Ida or DA ± hematopoietic cell transplant and azacitidine.Conclusions: This large population-level, retrospective analysis of CAS data provides a detailed overview of the management of patients with t-AML and AML-MRC. Historically, a high proportion of these high-risk patients have received less-intensive treatment. Since 2018, CPX-351 has been rapidly adopted into the IC treatment pathway, displacing DA chemotherapy. These analyses will be repeated after the CAS database has been updated to determine the impact of COVID-19. [Display omitted] DisclosuresLegg: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Muzwidzwa: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Adamson: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Wilkes: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Medalla: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.