Myc Network Research Articles

Role of Mxi1 in ageing organ systems and the regulation of normal and neoplastic growth.

Mxi1 belongs to the Mad (Mxi1) family of proteins, which function as potent antagonists of Myc oncoproteins. This antagonism relates partly to their ability to compete with Myc for the protein Max and for consensus DNA binding sites and to recruit transcriptional co-repressors. Mad(Mxi1) proteins have been suggested to be essential in cellular growth control and/or in the induction and maintenance of the differentiated state. Consistent with these roles, mxi1 may be the tumour-suppressor gene that resides at region 24-26 of the long arm of chromosome 10. This region is a cancer hotspot, and mutations here may be involved in several cancers, including prostate adenocarcinoma. Here we show that mice lacking Mxi1 exhibit progressive, multisystem abnormalities. These mice also show increased susceptibility to tumorigenesis either following carcinogen treatment or when also deficient in Ink4a. This cancer-prone phenotype may correlate with the enhanced ability of several mxi1-deficient cell types, including prostatic epithelium, to proliferate. Our results show that Mxi1 is involved in the homeostasis of differentiated organ systems, acts as a tumour suppressor in vivo, and engages the Myc network in a functionally relevant manner.

Lack of transcriptional repression by max homodimers

Max, a basic-helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper (bHLH-ZIP) protein, plays a central role in the transcriptional regulation of myc oncoprotein-responsive genes. Myc-max heterodimers bind to consensus E-box motifs near or within the promoters of these genes and activate gene expression, whereas heterodimers between max and members of the mad family of bHLH-ZIP proteins promote transcriptional repression. In contrast to all other members of the myc network, max readily homodimerizes and binds to identical E-box sites in vitro. However, the role for max homodimers in transcriptional repression in vivo is unclear. Upstream stimulatory factor (USF) is a bHLH-ZIP protein which does not interact with members of the myc-max-mad family. By replacing the HLH-ZIP domain of max with that from USF, we created a chimeric protein, max(USF), which was indistinguishable from max with respect to its ability to homodimerize and bind DNA. As expected, however, max(USF) was unable to heterodimerize with any of the tested max partner proteins and was incapable of suppressing c-myc target genes. Thus, transcriptional repression is an exclusive property of max-mad heterodimers and cannot be achieved by max homodimers alone.

Control of cell proliferation by Myc proteins.

Taken together, the available data appear to be consistent with a model in which Myc proteins function downstream of D-type cyclins and synergize with E2F proteins in the activation of the cyclin E/cdk2 kinase. This view of Myc proteins appears strikingly similar to established models for the E2F/DP family of proteins. However, it should be noted that there are clear differences and several predictions of such a model that have been critically tested for E2F proteins are still untested for Myc in this model. First, it appears that at least some target genes of Myc implicated in this process are still unknown; second, clear data from knockout cells that link p107 to Myc function are missing; and third, we are not aware of studies of tumour samples that clarify whether mutations in myc genes relieve the requirement for mutations in the cyclin D/p16 pathway.