Mutations In Thyroid Cancer Research Articles

Combination of dabrafenib (DAB) and lapatinib (LAP) for the treatment of BRAF-mutant thyroid cancer.

6087Background: mutations (BRAFm) are the most common mutations in thyroid cancer. BRAF inhibitors (DAB) are active in BRAFm melanoma, but there is less activity noted in BRAFm thyroid cancer. Prec...

The Clinical Utility of Cell-Free DNA Measurement in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) can be detected in the circulation of healthy individuals, but is found in higher concentrations in cancer patients. Furthermore, mutations in tumor cells can be identified in circulating DNA fragments. This has been the subject of significant interest in the field of cancer research, but little has been published in thyroid cancer. To assess all available evidence on the use of circulating cfDNA in the diagnosis, management and surveillance of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer, and collate it into a systematic review to guide future research. A comprehensive literature search on the measurement of cfDNA in thyroid cancer was undertaken, and results from relevant studies collated into a systematic review. Nine studies were identified, with varying methodologies and findings. Key techniques and findings are summarized. There is limited but promising evidence that somatic mutations in thyroid cancer can be detected in circulating cfDNA and are associated with more advanced disease. Further research is required to develop a clinically useful tool based on cfDNA to improve the management of thyroid cancers.

Utility of the BRAF p.V600E immunoperoxidase stain in FNA direct smears and cell block preparations from patients with thyroid carcinoma.

The identification of BRAF mutations in thyroid cancer has prognostic and therapeutic implications. Although the gold standard for identifying BRAF mutations is molecular testing, the ability to perform BRAF p.V600E immunostaining on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples can facilitate the rapid triaging of patients to treatment options. A total of 50 thyroid carcinoma FNA samples, including papillary (29 samples), poorly differentiated (10 samples), anaplastic (9 samples), and Hurthle cell (2 samples) carcinomas, with a known BRAF p.V600E mutation status were selected for the current study. Immunostaining was performed on smears and cell block sections using an anti-BRAF p.V600E antibody (clone VE1). The results were compared with the known mutation status obtained by molecular testing and/or immunostaining of surgical pathology material from the same patient. Of the total of 50 cases, 26 cases had smears available for the evaluation of BRAF p.V600E immunostaining; positive immunostaining was noted in 16 samples and negative immunostaining was noted in 4 samples, whereas 6 cases were equivocal. Of the 34 cases for which cell blocks were available for evaluation, BRAF p.V600E immunostaining was positive in 17 cases, negative in 16 cases, and equivocal in 1 case. The overall sensitivity and specificity of BRAF p.V600E immunostaining on the cell block preparation was 94.4% and 100%, respectively, whereas for the smears it was 80% and 63.6%, respectively. BRAF p.V600E immunostaining can be performed reliably on thyroid FNA cell block preparations. However, false-positive results on direct smears limit their utility and therefore need to be interpreted with caution. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:406-13. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Abstract 5186: Vemurafenib selectively radiosensitizes BRAF V600E mutant papillary and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells

Abstract BRAF activating mutations act as oncogenic drivers and are highly prevalent in thyroid cancer, occurring in about 60% of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) as well as 30-40% anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). MAPK signaling and treatment resistance is driven by BRAF mutations in thyroid cancer. Among the most common of these mutations is BRAFV600E, which can be selectively inhibited by vemurafenib. Using a panel of PTC and ATC cell lines we assessed how the presence/absence of BRAFV600E impacts radiation sensitivity. We used radiation clonogenics, comet assays, nuclear foci formation, immunoblotting, and mouse xenografts models to determine the effect of vemurafenib on PTC and ATC cells. Analysis of radiation clonogenics implicated higher radioresistance in cell lines containing the BRAFV600E mutation as compared to wild-type BRAF. Additionally, forced expression of BRAFV600E in a wild-type thyroid cancer cell line induced radioresistance. Vemurafenib inhibited MAPK signaling in V600E mutant cell lines, but showed no effect in BRAF wild-type cell lines. Vemurafenib pretreatment selectively radiosensitized BRAFV600E mutants in vitro, as assessed by radiation clonogenic assays. Comet assays revealed impairment of DNA repair in BRAFV600E lines when treated with vemurafenib and radiation. Additionally, γ-H2A.x westerns and nuclear foci staining indicated that vemurafenib pretreatment decreases the tumor cell’s ability to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) in BRAFV600E cell lines. Vemurafenib also appeared to alter the kinetics of formation and resolution of 53BP1 and Rad51 nuclear foci in these cell lines. Evaluation of DSB functional repair using GFP reporter constructs, suggests that BRAFV600E induces NHEJ repair, which can be attenuated by vemurafenib treatment. Finally, vemurafenib effectively increases radiosensitivity of BRAF V600E tumors in vivo. From our results, BRAF activating mutation appears to be associated with radioresistance. Vemurafenib selectively radiosensitizes both PTC and ATC cells through inhibition of DNA repair mechanisms. Combining vemurafenib and radiation may improve therapeutic control for BRAFV600E mutant thyroid cancers. Citation Format: Ryan N. Robb, Linlin Yang, Terence Williams. Vemurafenib selectively radiosensitizes BRAF V600E mutant papillary and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5186. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5186

Combination of dabrafenib (DAB).

6085 Background: BRAFV600E mutations (BRAFm) are the most common mutations in thyroid cancer. BRAF inhibitors are active in BRAFm melanoma, but there is less activity noted in BRAFm thyroid cancer. Preclinically, BRAF inhibitors inhibit BRAFm thyroid cancers only transiently due to activation of HER2/HER3, driven by a neuregulin-dependent autocrine loop. The addition of LAP, a HER2/HER3 kinase inhibitor, sensitizes the cell to growth suppression by BRAF inhibitors (Cancer Discov 5(3):520, 2013). A phase I study evaluating the combination of DAB, a BRAF inhibitor, and LAP was initiated to evaluate the safety and pharmacodynamic changes the combination. Methods: Eligibility included thyroid cancers with the presence of a BRAFV600E mutation. Any prior treatment was allowed. All patients received DAB 150 mg bid starting 2 weeks prior to LAP. Doses of daily lapatinib were escalated in a standard 3+3 design at (1) 750 mg; (2) 1250 mg; (3) 1500 mg. Toxicities, including Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT), were noted only after both drugs were started. Patients (pts) removed before the start of LAP were not included in the analysis. Biopsies were done at baseline, after the start of DAB, and after the start of both DAB and LAP. Responses were defined using RECIST 1.1. Results: 15 evaluable pts were enrolled on the phase I portion of the study. Gender – 10/15 (67%) male; median age – 63 years; histology – differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) 13 (87%), anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) 2 (13%); brain metastases – 4/15 (27%); prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor – 9/15 (54%). There was one DLT - Grade 5 event unlikely related to drugs in a pt with ATC. Grade 4 toxicities – 0. Grade 3 toxicities –lymphocytes (1). The partial response rate is 60%. The response rate in the DTC group is 69% (0% in ATC). One other pt came off treatment due to withdrawal of consent. Median progression-free survival is 15 months (range, 2-34+ months). Median follow up is 15 months. Translational studies are pending. Conclusions: The combination of DAB 150 mg bid and LAP 1500 mg daily was safe and well-tolerated. Furthermore, significant activity was noted, especially at the top dose level. Further investigation with this regimen is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01947023. [Table: see text]

Treatment and surveillance of advanced, metastatic iodine-resistant differentiated thyroid cancer.

This review will focus on the management and treatment of metastatic thyroid cancer that is radioactive iodine refractory and review the new drugs and their mechanism of actions as well as their adverse events. Until recently, there were no efficacious therapeutic modalities for these patients. With advancement in knowledge and research of the molecular aberrations and oncogenic mutations in thyroid cancer as well as further understanding the role of angiogenesis in tumor growth molecular pathogenesis, novel targeted therapies are available for these patients. Some of these drugs have successfully prolonged progression free survival and are now Food and Drug Administration approved. Additional agents are approved for the treatment of other types of cancers and are currently under investigation for differentiated thyroid cancer treatment. Differentiated thyroid cancer (papillary and follicular) is the most common endocrine malignancy. It is generally known to have an excellent prognosis and patients are usually cured with the conventional primary treatments including surgery, radioactive iodine, and thyroid stimulating hormone suppression. A minor proportion of patients do not fully recover mainly because they develop radioactive iodine-resistant disease. These patients have few treatment options, which we aimed to describe here.

Systematic Analysis of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Response to RET Gatekeeper Mutations in Thyroid Cancer.

The proto-oncogene protein RET is a receptor tyrosine kinase that plays an important role in the development and progress of various human cancers. Currently, targeting RET with small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been established as promising therapeutic strategy for thyroid carcinoma (TC). However, two gatekeeper mutations V804M and V804L in RET kinase domain have been frequently observed to cause drug resistance during the targeted therapy, largely limiting the application of reversible TKIs in TC. Here, we described an integrative protocol that combined literature curation, computational analysis, and in vitro kinase assay to systematically investigate the response profile of 9 approved RET TKIs to the two clinical RET gatekeeper mutations. It was revealed that the two mutations exhibit a similar energetic behavior to influence TKI binding, which can moderately decrease competitive inhibitor affinity and modestly increase substrate ATP affinity simultaneously. However, the binding potency of few second-generation kinase inhibitors such as Ponatinib and Alectinib can be improved to overcome the increased ATP affinity, thus restoring their inhibitory activity against the kinase mutants. Subsequently, the established protocol was employed to investigate the response profile of 4 commercially available RET TKIs that are under preclinical or clinical development. Three out of the four TKIs were found to become resistant upon the mutations due to steric hindrance effect introduced by the mutated residues, while the remaining one was moderately sensitized by the mutations since the mutated residues can form additional hydrophobic and van der Waals interactions with the inhibitor.

Abstract 892: Functional characterization of EIF1AX mutations in thyroid cancer predicts for gain of function by increasing translational rate with concomitant derepression of upstream inputs from mTOR

Abstract EIF1AX (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A) is a component of the translation pre-initiation complex (PIC). Recurrent EIF1AX mutations, first reported in uveal melanomas, are found in ∼1% of papillary thyroid cancers in a mutually exclusive manner with other oncogenic driver events (BRAF, RAS, and oncogenic fusions). By contrast, they are enriched in advanced thyroid cancers (9% of anaplastic and 11% poorly-differentiated thyroid cancers), and are strongly associated with RAS mutations (p<0.0001). EIF1AX mutations cluster in the N-terminal (NTT) or C-terminal tails (CTT). EIF1AX NTT missense mutations in thyroid cancer occur within the first 15 amino acids, whereas the CTT mutation disrupts a splice acceptor site at exon 6 (A113splice). A113splice is the most prevalent defect and is private to this disease, and results in two differentially spliced mRNAs: (1) Cryptic splice variant: by use of a cryptic acceptor site in exon 6 that leads to a 132 AA protein that excludes 12 AA; (2) Truncated splice variant: by retaining intron 5, leading to a 115 AA truncated protein. EIF1AX mutants retain the ability to recruit the ternary complex, as shown by co-IP with EIF2 after ectopic expression of NTT or A113splice EIF1AX mutants in HEK293T cells, or after CRISPR-mediated knock-in of A113splice into Cal62 RAS-mutant thyroid cancer cells. The EIF1AX mutants had greater affinity to EIF5 compared to WT, consistent with a more stable PIC. As translation initiation is a rate-limiting step, the altered affinity of EIF1AX mutants to PIC components could impact the rate of protein synthesis. We tested this by L-azidohomoalanine labeling, which showed contrasting roles of the two A113-generated splice variants expressed at endogenous levels: i.e. the cryptic splice variant increased protein synthetic rate, whereas the truncated splice variant strongly inhibited protein translation. Despite inhibiting translation, the truncated splice variant showed a paradoxical increase in 4EBP1 phosphorylation. Upon A113splice knock-in, where both variants are expressed, translation is increased, which we hypothesize results from the combined effects of 4EBP1 phosphorylation, caused by relief of negative feedback events upstream in the pathway, with increased PIC assembly caused by the cryptic splice variant. We are currently determining whether the altered rate of protein synthesis is global or selective. Of note, cells expressing the cryptic, but not the truncated splice form, showed a transforming phenotype as assessed by soft agar colony formation. As EIF1AX mutations co-occur with RAS mutations in advanced thyroid cancers, it is likely that RAS-induced PI3K-AKT/mTOR signaling may provide a further cooperative benefit and play a key role in disease progression, and in generating specific tumor cell dependencies. Citation Format: Gnana P. Krishnamoorthy, Inigo Landa, Jeffrey A. Knauf, James Nagarajah, Gunnar Rätsch, Hans-Guido Wendel, James A. Fagin. Functional characterization of EIF1AX mutations in thyroid cancer predicts for gain of function by increasing translational rate with concomitant derepression of upstream inputs from mTOR. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 892.

Highly Concordant Key Genetic Alterations in Primary Tumors and Matched Distant Metastases in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Distant metastases uncommonly occur in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), but they are a frequent cause of thyroid cancer-related death. Genomic alterations in metastatic tumors, and the relationship with their corresponding primary tumors in DTC, are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to investigate whether genetic alterations in primary tumors are concordant with distant metastases in DTC patients. Surgical samples from primary and matched distant metastatic tumor pairs from 17 DTC patients, and three additional unpaired metastatic tumors from two patients, were analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing (Ion Torrent Ampliseq cancer panel) with a focus on known recurrent somatic mutations in thyroid cancer. Additionally, TERT promoter mutations were assessed by direct sequencing. BRAF mutations were found in 8/10 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). A NRAS mutation was detected in one patient with follicular variant PTC. TERT promoter mutations were detected in 8/10 patients with PTC, and most were coexistent with a BRAF mutation (7/8 BRAF-positive PTC patients, and one BRAF-negative PTC patient). In follicular thyroid carcinoma, NRAS was the most frequently observed mutation (4/9 patients), followed by HRAS (two patients) and KRAS (one patient). TERT promoter mutations were found in 6/7 RAS-positive follicular thyroid carcinoma patients. Key somatic alterations such as BRAF and RAS mutations were highly concordant between primary and matched metastatic tumors without discrepancies. The BRAF or RAS mutant allelic frequency was higher in matched metastatic tumors than in the corresponding primary tumors (35% vs. 25% for BRAF mutation, p = 0.04; and 40% vs. 34% for RAS mutation, p = 0.002). TERT promoter mutations were also mostly concordant in matched tumors (concordance rate 93%). BRAF, RAS, and TERT mutations are highly prevalent in metastatic DTC, and are concordant between primary and metastatic DTC. This high concordance suggests that primary tumors may reflect the key somatic alterations in matched metastatic DTC. Frequent coexistent TERT promoter and BRAF or RAS mutations in metastatic DTC also suggests its important role in the progression of DTC.

TERT Promoter Mutations in Thyroid Cancer.

Two mutations (C228T and C250T) in the promoter region of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) have recently been described in different types of cancer including follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer (TC). In this paper, we reviewed the rates of these mutations in different types and subtypes of TC, their association with a number of clinical and histopathological features and outcome of TC, and their potential diagnostic and prognostic roles in TC. The overall rate of these mutations in TC is about 14% with least prevalence in the well-differentiated subtypes of papillary thyroid cancer (10-13%). Their rates increase significantly with increasing aggressiveness of TC reaching about 40% in the undifferentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancers. There is also clear association with increasing age of patients at the time of diagnosis of TC. The evidence is compelling but with some conflicting results for associations between TERT promoter mutations and tumor size, extrathyroidal invasion, distant metastases, high tumor TNM stage, BRAF (V600E) mutation, recurrence, and mortality. A couple of studies reported a potential diagnostic role for TERT promoter mutations in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology of fine needle aspiration biopsy. These studies showed 100% specificity but very low sensitivity of 7-10%. The sensitivity increases significantly when TERT promoter mutation testing is combined with other gene mutations, particularly BRAF (V600E) and RAS mutations. Although TERT promoter mutations seem to play significant roles in the pathogenesis of TC, the mechanisms by which they contribute to carcinogenesis remain elusive and future work is needed to fully assess the roles, interactions, and impact of these mutations on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutics of TC.

Clinical utility of RAS mutations in thyroid cancer: a blurred picture now emerging clearer.

RAS mutations play an important role in thyroid tumorigenesis. Considerable effort has been made in the last decade to apply RAS mutations as molecular markers to the clinical management of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer. Yet, for the low diagnostic sensitivities and specificities of RAS mutations, when used alone, and for their uncertain role in the clinical outcomes of thyroid cancer, it has been unclear how to appropriately use them to assist the management of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer. Studies from recent years, now added from the Alexander group, have shed light on this issue, making a blurred clinical picture now emerge clearer—RAS mutations, when combined with other genetic markers, have high diagnostic negative predictive values for thyroid cancer; cytologically benign thyroid nodules, including those positive for RAS mutations, have long-term clinical stability when non-surgically managed; and differentiated thyroid cancers harboring RAS mutations alone have an excellent prognosis. This progress in understanding RAS mutations in thyroid cancer is showing a major impact on molecular-based practice in the management of thyroid cancer.Please see related research articles: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0554-1 and http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0419-z

Identification of Novel Oncogenic Mutations in Thyroid Cancer

Thyroid cancer patients frequently have favorable outcomes. However, a small subset develops aggressive disease refractory to traditional treatments. Therefore, we sought to characterize oncogenic mutations in thyroid cancers to identify novel therapeutic targets that may benefit patients with advanced, refractory disease. Data on 239 thyroid cancer specimens collected between January 2009 and September 2014 were obtained from the Dana Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center. The tumors were analyzed with the OncoMap-4 or OncoPanel high-throughput genotyping platforms that survey up to 275 cancer genes and 91 introns for DNA rearrangement. Of the 239 thyroid cancer specimens, 128 (54%) had oncogenic mutations detected. These 128 tumors had 351 different mutations detected in 129 oncogenes or tumor suppressors. Examination of the 128 specimens demonstrated that 55% (n= 70) had 1 oncogenic mutation, and 45% (n= 48) had more than 1 mutation. The 351 oncogenic mutations were in papillary (85%), follicular (4%), medullary (7%), and anaplastic (4%) thyroid cancers. Analysis revealed that 2.3% (n= 3 genes) of the somatic gene mutations were novel. These included AR (n= 1), MPL (n= 2), and EXT2 (n= 1), which were present in 4 different papillary thyroid cancer specimens. New mutations were found in an additional 13 genes known to have altered protein expression in thyroid cancer: BLM, CBL, CIITA, EP300, GSTM5, LMO2, PRAME, SBDS, SF1, TET2, TNFAIP3, XPO1, and ZRSR2. This analysis revealed that several previously unreported oncogenic gene mutations exist in thyroid cancers and may be targets for the development of future therapies. Further investigation into the role of these genes is warranted.

Stomatin-like protein 2 overexpression in papillary thyroid carcinoma is significantly associated with high-risk clinicopathological parameters and BRAFV600E mutation.

Stomatin-like protein 2 (SLP-2), a member of the stomatin protein family, has emerged as a potential molecular hallmark of tumor progression in several human malignancies. The aim of this study was to analyze SLP-2 expression pattern in benign and malignant thyroid tumors (n = 210) and to examine its relationship with clinicopathological parameters and BRAFV600E mutation in thyroid cancer. SLP-2 immunohistochemical expression was not detected in benign adenomas and was absent/weak in follicular and anaplastic carcinomas. High expression levels of SLP-2, found only in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), particularly in the classical variant, were significantly associated with adverse clinicopathological parameters: lymph node metastasis (p = 0.002), extrathyroid invasion (p < 0.001), pT status (p < 0.001), and advanced tumor stage (p = 0.001). Additional genotyping of PTC cases for the BRAFV600E mutation revealed for the first time a close relation between SLP-2 overexpression and the presence of BRAF mutation (p = 0.02) with high positive rates of lymph node metastasis (70%) and extrathyroid invasion (80%) in these cases. The significant association of SLP-2 overexpression with unfavorable clinicopathological characteristics and BRAFV600E mutation indicates that SLP-2 may have a role in aggressiveness of BRAF-mutated PTC and that SLP-2 evaluation could be clinically useful in identification of high-risk PTC patients.

TERT promoter mutations in thyroid cancer.

The 2013 discovery of Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations chr5, 1,295,228 C>T (C228T) and 1,295,250 C>T (C250T) in thyroid cancer represents an important event in the thyroid cancer field and much progress has occurred since then. This article provides a comprehensive review of this exciting new thyroid cancer field. The oncogenic role of TERT promoter mutations involves their creation of consensus binding sites for E-twenty-six transcriptional factors. TERT C228T is far more common than TERT C250T and their collective prevalence is, on average, 0, 11.3, 17.1, 43.2 and 40.1% in benign thyroid tumors, papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), follicular thyroid cancer, poorly differentiated thyroid cancer and anaplastic thyroid cancer, respectively, displaying an association with aggressive types of thyroid cancer. TERT promoter mutations are associated with aggressive thyroid tumor characteristics, tumor recurrence and patient mortality as well as BRAF V600E mutation. Coexisting BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations have a robust synergistic impact on the aggressiveness of PTC, including a sharply increased tumor recurrence and patient mortality, while either mutation alone has a modest impact. Thus, TERT with promoter mutations represents a prominent new oncogene in thyroid cancer and the mutations are promising new diagnostic and prognostic genetic markers for thyroid cancer, which, in combination with BRAF V600E mutation or other genetic markers (e.g. RAS mutations), are proving to be clinically useful for the management of thyroid cancer. Future studies will specifically define such clinical utilities, elucidate the biological mechanisms and explore the potential as therapeutic targets of TERT promoter mutations in thyroid cancer.

Molecular Diagnosis Using Residual Liquid-Based Cytology Materials for Patients with Nondiagnostic or Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.

BackgroundMolecular analysis for common somatic mutations in thyroid cancer can improve diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the nondiagnostic or indeterminate category of thyroid nodules. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of molecular diagnosis from residual liquid-based cytology (LBC) material after cytological diagnosis.MethodsThis prospective study enrolled 53 patients with thyroid nodules diagnosed as nondiagnostic, atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) after FNAC. DNAs and RNAs were isolated from residual LBC materials. BRAFV600E and RAS point mutations, PAX8/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), RET/PTC1, and RET/PTC3 rearrangements were evaluated by real-time polymerase chain reaction and pyrosequencing.ResultsAll DNAs from 53 residual LBC samples could be analysed and point mutations were detected in 10 samples (19%). In 17 AUS nodules, seven samples (41%) had point mutations including BRAF (n=4), NRAS (n=2), and KRAS (n=1). In 20 FLUS nodules, three samples (15%) had NRAS point mutations. RNA from only one FLUS nodule could be analysed for rearrangements and there was no abnormality.ConclusionMolecular analysis for BRAF and RAS mutations was feasible in residual LBC materials and might be useful for diagnosis of indeterminate thyroid nodules.

TERT promoter mutations in thyroid cancer: a report from a Middle Eastern population.

Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations C228T and C250T have recently been described in follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer (TC) in patients from North America and Europe. In this study, we explored whether these findings could be replicated in patients from a different ethnic group. We screened 17 benign thyroid adenomas and 265 TC samples from patients in the Middle East for these mutations by PCR and direct sequencing using DNA isolated from paraffin-embedded tumor tissues. None of the 17 benign adenomas harbored TERT promoter mutations. Of 265 TC, 34 (12.8%) harbored TERT promoter mutations, including 10/153 (6.5%) conventional papillary TC (CPTC), 8/57 (14.0%) follicular variant PTC, 9/30 (30%) tall cell variant PTC, 1/3 (30%) Hurthle cell thyroid cancer (HTC), 1/5 (20%) follicular TC, and 5/13 (38.5%) poorly differentiated TC. C250T mutation was present in only 6/265 (2.3%) cases, while C228T mutation was present in a total of 28/265 (10.6%) cases. These two mutations were mutually exclusive. TERT promoter mutations were significantly more common in older (≥45 years) than younger patients and were associated with larger tumour size, vascular invasion, higher TNM stage (stage III and IV), BRAF(V600E) mutation and persistent/recurrent disease at 6-12 months after initial treatment and at the last follow up. These associations were stronger in non-CPTC. Thus, this study on a large cohort of TC patients from Middle East demonstrates that TERT promoter mutations are relatively common, especially in the non-CPTC, and are associated with more aggressive histopathological features, BRAF(V600E) mutation, and disease persistence/recurrence than the WT TERT.

Prognostic Value of Genetic Mutations in Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Genetic mutations have been found to be associated with thyroid cancer. Previous studies have been focused on the relation between genetic mutations and thyroid cancer. We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of the three most common genetic mutations (BRAF, RAS, and RET) in patients with thyroid cancer. Sources from MEDLINE (inception to December 2013) and EMBASE (inception to December 2013) were searched. Studies of thyroid cancer with results of genetic mutations and studies that reported survival data were included and two authors performed the data extraction independently. Any discrepancies were resolved by a consensus. Fourteen studies assessing BRAF mutations, 6 RAS mutations, 4 RET mutations, and 1 with analysis of both BRAF and RAS mutations were included in this meta-analysis. Patients with papillary thyroid cancer with BRAF mutations showed a 1.59-fold higher risk of events or a 2.66-fold higher risk of death than patients with papillary thyroid cancer without a BRAF mutation. Also, patients with RAS mutations showed a 2.90-fold higher risk of death by thyroid cancer than patients without a RAS mutation. In addition, patients with medullary thyroid cancer with RET mutations showed a 5.82-fold higher risk of death by the disease than without a RET mutation. Genetic mutations should be considered as a poor prognostic marker in thyroid cancer and may lead to better management of individual patients. However, the use of genetic mutations as prognostic markers should not be generalized, but individualized in the specific clinic setting.

Abstract 3416: Transcriptome analysis of papillary thyroid cancer using next-generation sequencing technologies in Korean patients

Abstract Thyroid cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide, and papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) accounts for &amp;gt;80% of all thyroid cancers. Here we conducted RNA sequencing for 70 PTC and 42 paired-normal tissues in Korean patients, and their transcriptomes were analyzed in various aspects. First, somatic mutations were screened transcriptome-wide throughout samples; BRAF mutation (V600E), which is the most well-established mutation in thyroid cancer, was detected in 47 samples out of 70 (67.14%). HRAS (Q61R, Q61K) and NRAS (Q61R) mutations were shown in two samples, respectively. In gene fusion analysis, we discovered four fusion mutations using our stringent criteria and these include CCDC6-RET and PAX8-PPARG fusions, which have been previously reported for thyroid cancer. Other EZR-ERBB4 and PAX8-GLIS3 fusions are novel fusion mutations found in PTC, and the sample having EZR-ERBB4 mutation was diagnosed as the follicular variant subtype. This is an in-frame mutation and previous reports have shown that ERBB4 is a driver gene for carcinogenesis in multiple types of cancers. In addition, we also found ETV6-NTRK3 fusion in less conservative criteria, which was a well-known fusion in other cancer types. Each fusion mutation above was shown in only one sample, respectively. Through gene expression analysis, we clustered PTC cancer samples into four groups; three of them are shown to be enriched with BRAF V600E mutation, and the other includes samples with NRAS, HRAS mutation. In this study, we thoroughly explored the transcriptome of PTC samples using the next-generation sequencing method and proved well-correlation between mutation and expression profiles. These results not only replicated several findings of previous studies and suggested some novel genes or pathways involved in the PTC development in Koreans. Citation Format: Seungbok Lee, Hyeon-Gun Jee, Kyu Eun Lee, Jeong-Sun Seo. Transcriptome analysis of papillary thyroid cancer using next-generation sequencing technologies in Korean patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 3416. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-3416

Hobnail Variant of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: An Institutional Case Series and Molecular Profile

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is increasing in incidence while mortality is unchanged. Identifying patients with higher risk of recurrence and death is essential. Case series identify the hobnail variant of PTC (HVPTC), which is characterized by micropapillary architecture, apocrine features, and loss of cellular polarity. Herein, we describe the clinical course, pathologic features, and mutational profile of patients at our institution with HVPTC. A query into the surgical pathologic database (2009-2012) was performed, and clinicopathologic data were collected on all patients carrying the diagnosis of HVPTC. BRAF(V600E) testing was performed on paraffin-embedded blocks using SNaPshot mutational analysis. Twelve patients with HVPTC were identified, with an average age of 54.1±18.8 years. Seven patients (63.6%) were AJCC Stage III or IV at presentation. Tumors were large (3.7±2.0 cm), some were multifocal (33.3%), and frequently with extrathyroidal extension (58.3%), lymphovascular invasion (41.7%), and lymph node metastasis (75%). Forty percent of the patients had concomitant tall cell features (TCF), and two had small foci of undifferentiated (anaplastic) thyroid carcinoma (ATC). Eighty percent of tumors undergoing mutational analysis had the BRAF(V600E) mutation, and the remaining 20% harbored a RET/PTC1 gene rearrangement. No other known thyroid cancer mutations were identified on SNaPshot analysis. At median follow-up of 26 months, four patients had recurrent or persistent disease, one of whom died from the disease one year after surgery. The hobnail variant of PTC has an aggressive behavior, with a high incidence of infiltrative tumors and metastatic disease. Strikingly, all tumors in our series harbored a PTC-associated genetic abnormality, either a BRAF(V600E) mutation (80%) or a RET/PTC1 rearrangement (20%). This histologic variant warrants further study, and patients with this diagnosis should be observed closely for recurrence.

Highly prevalent TERT promoter mutations in aggressive thyroid cancers

Mutations 1 295 228 C>T and 1 295 250 C>T (termed C228T and C250T respectively), corresponding to −124 C>T and −146 C>T from the translation start site in the promoter of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene, have recently been reported in human cancers, but not in thyroid cancers yet. We explored these mutations in thyroid cancers by genomic sequencing of a large number of primary tumor samples. We found the C228T mutation in 0 of 85 (0.0%) benign thyroid tumors, 30 of 257 (11.7%) papillary thyroid cancers (PTC), 9 of 79 (11.4%) follicular thyroid cancers (FTC), 3 of 8 (37.5%) poorly differentiated thyroid cancers (PDTC), 23 of 54 (42.6%) anaplastic thyroid cancers (ATC), and 8 of 12 (66.7%) thyroid cancer cell lines. The C250T mutation was uncommon, but mutually exclusive with the C228T mutation, and the two mutations were collectively found in 11 of 79 (13.9%) FTC, 25 of 54 (46.3%) ATC, and 11 of 12 (91.7%) thyroid cancer cell lines. Among PTC variants, the C228T mutation was found in 4 of 13 (30.8%) tall-cell PTC (TCPTC), 23 of 187 (12.3%) conventional PTC, and 2 of 56 (3.6%) follicular variant PTC samples. No TERT mutation was found in 16 medullary thyroid cancer samples. The C228T mutation was associated with the BRAF V600E mutation in PTC, being present in 19 of 104 (18.3%) BRAF mutation-positive PTC vs 11 of 153 (7.2%) the BRAF mutation-negative PTC samples (P=0.0094). Conversely, BRAF mutation was found in 19 of 30 (63.3%) C228T mutation-positive PTC vs 85 of 227 (37.4%) C228T mutation-negative PTC samples (P=0.0094). We thus for the first time, to our knowledge, demonstrate TERT promoter mutations in thyroid cancers, that are particularly prevalent in the aggressive thyroid cancers TCPTC, PDTC, ATC and BRAF mutation-positive PTC, revealing a novel genetic background for thyroid cancers.