Mutation-specific Antibodies Research Articles

Diagnostic, prognostic and predictive relevance of molecular markers in gliomas.

The advances of genome-wide 'discovery platforms' and the increasing affordability of the analysis of significant sample sizes have led to the identification of novel mutations in brain tumours that became diagnostically and prognostically relevant. The development of mutation-specific antibodies has facilitated the introduction of these convenient biomarkers into most neuropathology laboratories and has changed our approach to brain tumour diagnostics. However, tissue diagnosis will remain an essential first step for the correct stratification for subsequent molecular tests, and the combined interpretation of the molecular and tissue diagnosis ideally remains with the neuropathologist. This overview will help our understanding of the pathobiology of common intrinsic brain tumours in adults and help guiding which molecular tests can supplement and refine the tissue diagnosis of the most common adult intrinsic brain tumours. This article will discuss the relevance of 1p/19q codeletions, IDH1/2 mutations, BRAF V600E and BRAF fusion mutations, more recently discovered mutations in ATRX, H3F3A, TERT, CIC and FUBP1, for diagnosis, prognostication and predictive testing. In a tumour-specific topic, the role of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway mutations in the pathogenesis of pilocytic astrocytomas will be covered.

The effect of platinum based adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in the surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma according to the expression of EGFR mutation specific antibody and c-MET.

7523 Background: To assess the role of mutant EGFR and C-MET in survival benefit obtained from platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (PBAC) among resected lung adenocarcinoma (RLADC) patients. Metho...

Validation of a Manual Protocol for BRAF V600E Mutation-specific Immunohistochemistry.

Detection of BRAF V600E has diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic relevance. The recently developed BRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody has evolved into a feasible alternative to DNA analysis. The plethora of immunohistochemical protocols makes implementation tedious and, here we tested a set of manual and automated protocols and compared test performance with sequencing results. For assays, we employed formalin-fixed, in part decalcified, and paraffin-embedded tissue samples. Empiric testing of manual protocols included 10 variables in 17 protocols. Automated immunohistochemical staining and BRAF pyrosequencing served as independent test methods. Test performance measures were compared without considering 1 method as a standard. Four well-fixed samples (2WT/2Mut) were used for testing of all protocols and indicated 2 correctly classifying procedures. Practical performance assessment employed 33 independent tissue samples, composed of 27 leukemias (by pyrosequencing: 8 wild-type; 18 mutated; 1 noninformative) and 6 melanomas (V600E; V600K; wild-type, 2 each). Manual V600E staining was positive in 20 cases (19 of 20 V600E-containing samples plus the 1 sample that was noninformative), whereas all wild-type and V600K cases were immunonegative. Manual or automated staining as well as pyrosequencing would have missed an equal number of V600E-mutated cases and the correlation coefficient for these methods was 0.75 to 0.93 (substantial to almost perfect); the Youden index was 0.95. Detection of V600E-mutated BRAF at the protein level in routine and decalcified tissue samples is possible, and the presented manual protocols should expedite implementation in routine diagnostic practice. Our results indicate that both molecular techniques should be considered complementary.

Immunohistochemical detections of EGFR status in NSCLC

背景与目的存在表皮生长因子受体（epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR）突变的非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）患者对EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂（tyrosine kinase inhibitor, TKI）治疗有良好反应。与检测EGFR突变的分子水平手段相比，免疫组织化学法（immunohistochemistry, IHC）价格低廉，操作简便、迅速，易开展。本研究旨在探索免疫组化法检测EGFR突变的准确性。方法选取97例NSCLC患者的手术或组织活检标本行EGFR特异性抗体的免疫组化染色，分析染色阳性标本的临床病理特征，并继续接受液相芯片检测验证是否存在突变；新收集40例被证实为EGFR突变的手术标本接受免疫组化染色，计算免疫组化法检出突变灵敏度。结果97例NSCLC标本，17例染色阳性，染色阳性标本好发于女性、腺癌、不吸烟患者中，其染色阳性标本中，76.9%实际存在突变。40例EGFR突变标本中，免疫组化法检出突变的灵敏度为40%。结论免疫组化法染色评分为强阳性的标本结果准确，但该方法灵敏度不甚理想，不同研究者所得结果差异较大，临床推广是否可行仍有待进一步探讨。

BRAFV600E protein expression in primary cutaneous malignant melanomas and paired metastases.

BRAFV600E mutations are present in approximately 50% of cutaneous malignant melanomas (CMMs). The use of BRAFV600E mutation-specific monoclonal antibody VE1 immunohistochemical analysis may facilitate rapid detection of BRAFV600E mutations in CMMs and demonstrate heterogeneity among tumors. To characterize the pattern of BRAFV600E protein expression in primary CMMs with matched metastases and to analyze the use of VE1 immunohistochemical analysis in clinical practice using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. In this retrospective cohort study performed at Karolinska University Hospital from September 2012 to September 2013, we examined CMMs (124 primary tumors and 76 metastases) with VE1 immunohistochemical analysis, and results were compared with DNA mutation analyses. Determination of intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity as well as the sensitivity and specificity of VE1 immunohistochemical analysis. Positive staining results with the VE1 antibody were detected in 94 of 200 tumors (47.0%). In general, VE1 staining was homogeneous. However, VE1 staining intensity varied among the primary tumors and corresponding metastases in 63 of 135 tumors (46.7%), but a change of mutational status based on DNA analysis was found in only 4 matched tumors (3.0%). Discordant findings between DNA mutation analysis and immunohistochemical analysis were observed in 12 tumors. The overall sensitivity and specificity of VE1 immunohistochemical analysis were 96.7% and 94.5%, respectively. A comparable sensitivity was obtained for primary and metastatic CMMs. The specificity was lower among primary CMMs (92.4%) compared with metastases (98.0%). We found VE1 immunohistochemical analysis to be a useful and rapid assay for BRAFV600E mutations that may contribute to the detection of intratumoral and intertumoral heterogenetic subclones. Tumors with positive results, including strong staining, should be expedited for confirmatory BRAF mutation testing. If this test result is negative, a false-negative result of the mutation analysis should be considered. Validation of VE1 immunohistochemical analysis in clinical practice is needed.

Detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 E746-A750 deletion and EGFR exon 21 point mutations in lung adenocarcinoma by immunohistochemistry: a comparative study to EGFR exons 19 and 21 mutations analysis using PCR followed by high-resolution melting and pyrosequencing

Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with adenocarcinoma histology confers susceptibility to treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Analysis of these activating mutations is typically performed by molecular techniques including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification followed by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) melting curve analysis and/or direct sequencing. Recently developed mutation-specific immunohistochemical stains for the L858R point mutation in exon 21 and an E746-A750 deletion in exon 19 of the EGFR gene may offer a fast, cost-effective alternative to molecular testing. In this study, EGFR exons 19 and 21 mutations were analyzed using EGFR E746-A750 del and EGFR L585R point mutation-specific antibodies and the results were compared with the exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L588R point mutation as detected by molecular testing. The findings demonstrate a high concordance rate (100% in 12 cases) between the two methodologies for EGFR exon 21 L585R point mutation but a low concordance rate (54% in 22 cases) for exon 19 deletions when using EGFR E746-A750 mutation-specific antibody compared to molecular testing. This low concordance rate between the two methods is due to the fact that EGFR exon 19 mutations include deletions other than E746-A750 as well as insertion/deletions that will not be covered by exon 19 E746-A750 del mutation-specific antibody. Despite this limitation, the current EGFR mutation-specific antibodies can prove useful as an alternative to molecular tests for exon 21 L585R mutations as well as a subset of EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations, particularly in cases with low percentage of tumor concentration and in decalcified tissue specimens that are not suitable for DNA-based molecular assays.

Tumour‐to‐tumour metastasis from papillary thyroid carcinoma with BRAF mutation to lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation: the utility of mutation‐specific antibodies

Tumour-to-tumour metastasis is a rare event. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the utility of mutation-specific antibodies to prove the occurrence of metastatic papillary thyroid cancer donor into lung adenocarcinoma recipient. We report the case of an 80-year-old woman who had a papillary thyroid carcinoma with a v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 mutation that metastasized into a lung adenocarcinoma with an epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. Immunohistochemical analysis with mutation-specific antibodies not only clearly revealed two components, but also revealed their gene mutation statuses. As a component of multimodal diagnostic tools, immunohistochemistry can avoid some pitfalls involved in the molecular diagnosis of complicated cases (such as our own) and can help to ensure that patients receive optimal treatments.

Diagnostic advantage of double immunohistochemistry using two mutation-specific anti-IDH antibodies (HMab-1 and MsMab-1) in gliomas.

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation is a valuable prognostic marker and a tool for decision-making for glioma treatment. An algorithm for IDH mutation screening was recently proposed--it consists of a two-step process of an initial search for the most common IDH1-R132H mutation using immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based assay, followed by DNA-based analysis of IHC-negative or -equivocal cases. Here, we report that immunohistochemistry using two mutation-specific anti-IDH monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)--an IDH1-R132H-specific mAb (clone HMab-1) and a multi-specific mAb (clone MsMab-1)--is easy and reliable for IDH mutation screening. We investigated the IDH status of 54 grade III gliomas. For the first screening, we used HMab-1 IHC and for the second, (of HMab-1-negative cases) we used MsMab-1 IHC. The double IHC screening results were confirmed using sequence analysis (100% specificity and 100% sensitivity). Thirty of 54 cases (55.6%) had IDH mutations and the remaining 24 were of the IDH wild type; moreover, the screening results predicted grade III glioma prognosis. IDH sequencing procedures are popular but inconsistent across laboratories. By contrast, double IHC screening using HMab-1 and MsMab-1 is very reliable for detecting IDH1/2 mutations and can predict survival in grade III glioma patients.

Novel use for an EGFR mutation-specific antibody in discriminating lung adenocarcinoma from reactive pneumocyte hyperplasia.

Pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs) are frequently observed. Histopathologically, their presentation can indicate a wide range of disorders from an inflammatory process to malignancy. An accurate diagnosis based on GGNs can sometimes be challenging on small-sized biopsies. Mutations in the EGFR gene are detected in pulmonary adenocarcinomas (ADCs). Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies that detect specific EGFR mutations has been shown to correlate with mutational status as determined by molecular methods. We hypothesized that these antibodies could be used to discriminate between ADCs and benign pneumocyte hyperplasias. Surgically resected, pre-invasive to invasive lung ADC (n = 32) and reactive pneumocyte hyperplasia (n = 40) tissue samples were probed with antibodies against EGFR mutations, p53, Mouse double minute 2 and 14-3-3 sigma. Of the 32 lung ADC specimens analysed, 12 (38%) were positive using the EGFR mutation-specific antibodies, while no immunoreactivity was observed in reactive pneumocyte hyperplasia specimens. Analyses of receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the highest area under the curve values were associated with the use of EGFR mutation-specific antibodies. In addition, a high concordance rate was observed between surgically resected and corresponding biopsy materials using these antibodies. EGFR mutation-specific antibodies can be used to discriminate between lung ADC and benign pneumocyte hyperplasia, even in small-sized biopsies.

Identification of EGFR Mutations by Immunohistochemistry with EGFR Mutation-Specific Antibodies in Biopsy and Resection Specimens from Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma.

PurposeMutation-specific antibodies have recently been developed for identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations by immunohistochemistry (IHC). This study was designed to investigate whether the type of specimen (biopsy vs. resection) would make a difference in determining mutation status by IHC, and to evaluate whether biopsies are suitable for detection of mutant EGFR protein.Materials and MethodsIHC was performed using mutation-specific antibodies for E746-A750 deletion (DEL) and L858R point mutation (L858R) in biopsies and tissue microarrays of resected tumors from 154 patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Results were then compared with DNA sequencing data.ResultsMolecular-based assays detected EGFR mutations in 62 patients (40.3%), including 14 (9.1%) with DEL, and 31 (20.1%) with L858R. IHC with two mutation-specific antibodies showed a homogeneous staining pattern, and correctly identified EGFR mutation status in 89% (137/154). Overall (biopsy/resection) sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 75.6% (78.3%/72.7%), 94.5% (90.9%/96.3%), 85% (78.3%/88.9%), and 90.4% (90.9%/89.7%), respectively.ConclusionOur data showed that IHC using EGFR mutation–specific antibodies is useful for detection of EGFR mutations with high specificity and good sensitivity not only for resection specimens but also for biopsy materials. Therefore, IHC using EGFR mutation–specific antibodies may preclude a second biopsy procedure to obtain additional tissues for identification of EGFR mutations by molecular assays in biopsies from advanced cancer, particularly when tumor cells in the samples are limited.

34. BRAF V600E mutation detection in cell blocks of thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology samples

Introduction BRAF mutation c.1799T>A, p.Val600Glu (or V600E) in thyroid neoplasms is exclusively associated with papillary carcinoma (PTC) or anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Demonstration of BRAF mutation has been suggested as a supplement to confirmation of PTC in cytology material. Recently a V600E mutation specific antibody has been developed. We aim to assess the feasibility of testing for BRAF V600E mutational status in cytology (cell block) material. Methods 39 adequate cell blocks (CBs) and 18 available follow-up histology cases were tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (clone VE1, 1:400, Spring Biosciences, Pleasanton, California, using Optiview amplification kit) and molecular methods (castPCR: Competitive Allele Specific Taqman PCR, Life Technologies, CA, USA), followed by single-strand confirmation polymorphism (SSCP) if required. All cell blocks tested included H+E sections to confirm adequacy of abnormal cells. Any fine granular cytoplasmic staining in abnormal cells was considered as a positive IHC result. DNA content on CBs ranged from 2.4–54.1 ng/μL and was considered adequate for both molecular methods. Results Tabled 1 CYTOLOGY (n=39) IHC POSNEG MolecularPOS172 sensitivity =89.5% NEG416 specificity =80.0% HISTOLOGY (n=18) IHC POSNEG MolecularPOS130sensitivity =100% NEG14specificity =80.0% CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY CORRELATION (n=18) Cytology BRAF(any method) POSNEG Histology BRAF (any method) POS104sensitivity=71.4% NEG04specificity =100% Open table in a new tab Conclusions 1.BRAF V600E mutation assessment in thyroid cell block cytology material is feasible although the role in diagnostic algorithm requires further investigation. 2.Specificity of CB BRAF positivity by both IHC and molecular methods was 100% (no false positive findings). 3.Discrepancies noted between IHC and molecular methods requires further investigation. BRAF mutation c.1799T>A, p.Val600Glu (or V600E) in thyroid neoplasms is exclusively associated with papillary carcinoma (PTC) or anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Demonstration of BRAF mutation has been suggested as a supplement to confirmation of PTC in cytology material. Recently a V600E mutation specific antibody has been developed. We aim to assess the feasibility of testing for BRAF V600E mutational status in cytology (cell block) material. 39 adequate cell blocks (CBs) and 18 available follow-up histology cases were tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (clone VE1, 1:400, Spring Biosciences, Pleasanton, California, using Optiview amplification kit) and molecular methods (castPCR: Competitive Allele Specific Taqman PCR, Life Technologies, CA, USA), followed by single-strand confirmation polymorphism (SSCP) if required. All cell blocks tested included H+E sections to confirm adequacy of abnormal cells. Any fine granular cytoplasmic staining in abnormal cells was considered as a positive IHC result. DNA content on CBs ranged from 2.4–54.1 ng/μL and was considered adequate for both molecular methods. 1.BRAF V600E mutation assessment in thyroid cell block cytology material is feasible although the role in diagnostic algorithm requires further investigation. 2.Specificity of CB BRAF positivity by both IHC and molecular methods was 100% (no false positive findings). 3.Discrepancies noted between IHC and molecular methods requires further investigation.

The utility of BRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody VE1 for the diagnosis of hairy cell leukemia.

BRAF V600E mutation is characteristic of hairy cell leukemia (HCL). A V600E mutation-specific antibody, VE1, has been recently developed. We studied the diagnostic utility of this antibody in HCL and compared it with other B-cell neoplasms. VE1 activity was assessed using immunohistochemistry in 90 mature B-cell neoplasms, including HCL (n = 17), HCL variant (n = 6), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (n = 20), and 47 other B-cell lymphomas. Most (87/90) specimens were formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded bone marrow (BM) biopsy specimens decalcified in either hydrochloric acid or formic acid. VE1 was positive in 15 (88%) cases of HCL and two (10%) cases of CLL and was negative in all other tumors assessed. The VE1-positive HCL cases showed uniform staining in all tumor cells, but intensity was variable. The two VE1-negative HCL cases had BRAF V600 mutations proven by molecular analysis. The two CLL cases positive with VE1 showed an atypical staining pattern with expression in a minority of lymphoma cells. Immunohistochemistry using the VE1 antibody had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 97% for HCL. VE1 immunohistochemistry is a useful and convenient surrogate for detecting BRAF V600E mutation in BM biopsy specimens decalcified with hydrochloric or formic acid-based solutions.

High specificity but low sensitivity of mutation-specific antibodies against EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer

Determination of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has a pivotal impact on treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A standardized test has not yet been approved. So far, Sanger DNA sequencing has been widely used. Its rather low sensitivity has led to the development of more sensitive methods including real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Immunohistochemistry with mutation-specific antibodies might be a promising detection method. We evaluated 210 samples with NSCLC from an unselected Caucasian population. Extracted DNA was analyzed for EGFR mutations by RT-PCR (Therascreen EGFR PCR kit, Qiagen, UK; reference method). For immunohistochemistry, antibodies against exon19 deletions (clone 6B6), exon21 mutations (clone 43B2) from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, USA) and EGFR variantIII (clone 218C9) from Dako (Copenhagen, DK) were applied. Protein expression was evaluated, and staining score (multipum of intensity (graded 0–3) and percentages (0–100%) of stained tumor cells) was calculated. Positivity was defined as staining score >0. Specificity of exon19 antibody was 98.8% (95% confidence interval=95.9–99.9%) and of exon21 antibody 97.8% (95% confidence interval=94.4–99.4%). Sensitivity of exon19 antibody was 63.2% (95% confidence interval=38.4–83.7%) and of exon21 antibody was 80.0% (95% confidence interval=44.4–97.5%). Seven exon19 and four exon21 mutations were false negatives (immunohistochemistry negative, RT-PCR positive). Two exon19 and three exon21 mutations were false positive (immunohistochemistry positive, RT-PCR negative). One false positive exon21 mutation had staining score 300. The EGFR variantIII antibody showed no correlation to EGFR mutation status determined by RT-PCR or to EGFR immunohistochemistry. High specificity of the mutation-specific antibodies was demonstrated. However, sensitivity was low, especially for exon19 deletions, and thus these antibodies cannot yet be used as screening method for EGFR mutations in NSCLC. Refinement of sensitivity for the mutation-specific antibodies is warranted to improve molecular diagnosis using EGFR immunohistochemistry.

Quantum dots immunofluorescence histochemical detection of EGFR gene mutations in the non-small cell lung cancers using mutation-specific antibodies.

BackgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status plays an important role in therapeutic decision making for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Since EGFR mutation-specific antibodies (E746-A750del and L858R) have been developed, EGFR mutation detection by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a suitable screening test. On this basis, we want to establish a new screening test, quantum dots immunofluorescence histochemistry (QDs-IHC), to assess EGFR gene mutation in NSCLC tissues, and we compared it to traditional IHC and amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS).Materials and methodsEGFR gene mutations were detected by QDs-IHC, IHC, and ADx-ARMS in 65 cases of NSCLC composed of 55 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens and ten pleural effusion cell blocks, including 13 squamous cell carcinomas, two adenosquamous carcinomas, and 50 adenocarcinomas.ResultsPositive rates of EGFR gene mutations detected by QDs-IHC, IHC, and ADx-ARMS were 40.0%, 36.9%, and 46.2%, respectively, in 65 cases of NSCLC patients. The sensitivity of QDs-IHC when detecting EGFR mutations, as compared to ADx-ARMS, was 86.7% (26/30); the specificity for both antibodies was 100.0% (26/26). IHC sensitivity was 80.0% (24/30) and the specificity was 92.31% (24/26). When detecting EGFR mutations, QDs-IHC and ADx-ARMS had perfect consistency (κ =0.882; P<0.01). Excellent agreement was observed between IHC and ADx-ARMS when detecting EGFR mutations (κ =0.826; P<0.01).ConclusionQDs-IHC is a simple and standardized method to detect EGFR mutations with its high sensitivity and specificity, as compared with real-time polymerase chain reaction. In addition, the development of specific antibodies against EGFR mutation proteins might be useful for the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer.

Utility of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of pleuropulmonary and mediastinal cancers: a review and update.

Immunohistochemistry has become an indispensable ancillary tool for the accurate classification of pleuropulmonary and mediastinal neoplasms necessary for therapeutic decisions and predicting prognostic outcome in the era of personalized medicine. Diagnostic accuracy has significantly improved because of the continuous discoveries of tumor-associated biomarkers and the development of effective immunohistochemical panels. To increase the accuracy of diagnosis and classify pleuropulmonary neoplasms through immunohistochemistry. Literature review, authors' research data, and personal practice experience. This review article has shown that appropriately selecting immunohistochemical panels enables pathologists to effectively diagnose most primary pleuropulmonary neoplasms and differentiate primary lung tumors from a variety of metastatic tumors to the lung. The discovery of new mutation-specific antibodies identifying a subset of specific gene-arranged lung tumors provides a promising alternative and cost-effective approach to molecular testing. Knowing the utilities and pitfalls of each tumor-associated biomarker is essential to avoiding potential diagnostic errors.

Immunohistochimie et médecine personnalisée en oncologie pulmonaire: potentialités et limites

The concept of personalized or stratified medicine in thoracic oncology have led to the development of companion diagnostic testing in the laboratories in order to detect genomic alterations which can be targeted by therapeutic molecules. The use of these companion tests has to be associated with an optimized quality control with the aim of getting solid results before treatment administration to the patients. The great majority of these tests is based on molecular biology approach. However, since the commercial availability of different antibodies targeting genomic alterations which can be used in formalin fixed paraffin sections, an alternative method to the molecular approach is the immunohistochemistry (IHC). Some of these antibodies are or will be probably soon used in a daily routine practice (such as anti-ALK or anti-MET antibodies). Other antibodies have currently a more restricted use in thoracic oncology (such as anti-BRAF V600E, anti-ROS1 and mutation-specific anti-EGFR antibodies). In this review, we aim to detail the advantages and the limits of IHC method in thoracic oncology field for personalized medicine, in particular comparatively to the molecular biology technology. Moreover, we discuss the opportunity to provide accredited IHC tests in the context of stratified medicine for lung cancer patients.

EG-08 * IDH MUTATIONS IN GLIOMAS ASSOCIATED WITH ENCHONDROMATOSIS

The enchondromatoses, Ollier's disease and Maffucci syndrome, are non-heritable developmental disorders characterized by multiple enchondromas (Olllier's) in association with hemangiomas (Maffucci). Glial neoplasms are reported in both disorders but a pathogenic mechanism underlying this association has not been identified. We report a case of anaplastic astrocytoma in a 23 year old man with Maffucci syndrome whose tumor carried a substitution mutation of arginine for cysteine at position 132 (R132C) of the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) protein. This mutation, commonly found in Maffucci-associated enchondromas and hemangiomas, was not detected on routine immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of the astrocytoma using the R132H mutation-specific antibody, commonly applied in clinical laboratories. The R132C mutation was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and subsequently confirmed using a SNaPshot assay. Because somatic mosaic IDH mutations are associated with enchondromas and hemangiomas in Maffucci syndrome, we looked for the R132C mutation in a hemangioma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) and histologically normal brain surrounding the tumor from this patient. The mutation was present in the hemangioma, absent in PBMNC, and present in 2% of alleles in ‘normal’ brain. The low level in surrounding brain tissue is consistent with tumor cell infiltration, not mosaicism, as a S173T p53 mutation in the tumor showed similar results. Using IHC, we further demonstrated that the mutant IDH1 protein in this glioma functions as an oncometabolite. Two repressive histone trimethylation marks were strongly positive in the tumor, supporting a role for 2-hydroxyglutarate in the inhibition of histone demethylation. Together, these data demonstrate that an IDH1 mutation common in enchodromatoses underlies the association of glial tumors reported in both Ollier's disease and Maffucci syndrome.

Immunohistochemical detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in melanoma patients with monoclonal antibody VE1.

A novel mutation-specific monoclonal antibody VE1 was generated to detect BRAF V600E mutation with immunohistochemistry. This study aims to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry compared with conventional Sanger sequencing and to evaluate whether IHC would become the routine screening method of BRAF V600E mutation. A total of 84 cases of melanoma lesion specimens were selected to make the tissue microarray and to perform IHC with VE1 antibody. Simultaneously Sanger sequencing was applied to test and verify. VE1 has a high specificity (100%) and sensitivity (72.2%), and the concordance between the two techniques is excellent (93.8% cases coherent and kappa = 0.801). As a rapid, cost-effective method, IHC may become the routine diagnostic means for the detection of BRAF V600E mutation of malignant melanomas in the near future, and the recommended detection process is initial immunohistochemical staining for positive cases, followed by molecular techniques for negative or ambiguous cases.

Prospective immunohistochemical analysis of BRAF V600E mutation in melanoma.

The v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) V600E mutation is the most common activating genetic alteration of this oncogene and a predictive marker for the therapeutic use of BRAF inhibitors in melanoma. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of BRAF V600E mutation-specific monoclonal antibody (VE1) in a prospective diagnostic setting of melanoma patients (n = 102). All 41 cases (40.2%) that showed a V600E mutation in the cyclic minisequencing analysis of the DNA were also initially scored immunopositive. Two cases that were scored as BRAF V600E mutation positive by immunohistochemistry were negative in the DNA-based mutation analysis and determined to be immunonegative in a repeated staining with more representative specimens. Thus, BRAF V600E mutation detection using immunohistochemistry was 100% sensitive and 96.8% specific, when compared with the analysis of the DNA. None of the BRAF V600K mutations was detected by the VE1 antibody (n = 7). However, the VE1 antibody detected a rare V600E2 mutation. We also studied the role of BRAF V600E mutation in a set of melanoma patients who had been investigated for sentinel node metastasis. Melanoma lymph node metastases were diagnosed in 21.8% (12/55) of the sentinel nodes, and BRAF V600E immunopositivity was detected in 34.5% (19/55) of the cases. BRAF V600E mutation status did not correlate with any clinicopathological parameters. In conclusion, analysis of BRAF V600E mutation in melanoma by immunohistochemistry is a sensitive and specific method, which can be used to identify BRAF inhibitor-sensitive melanoma patients as a first-line method due to its rapid and affordable nature.

Immunohistochemistry with a novel mutation-specific monoclonal antibody as a screening tool for the EGFR L858R mutational status in primary lung adenocarcinoma.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status is the best predictor of patient response to treatments with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in primary lung adenocarcinoma and is typically analyzed by DNA-based techniques, such as direct DNA sequencing and allele-specific PCR. Recently, however, two mutation-specific antibodies against delE746-A750 in exon 19 and L858R in exon 21 have opened the door for a more convenient and more efficient strategy to determine EGFR mutation status. To evaluate the clinical application of a new mutation-specific mouse monoclonal antibody for EGFR (L858R), we performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies with tumor samples from primary lung adenocarcinoma in retrospective and validation settings. A total of 215 cases of primary lung adenocarcinoma were examined and compared using a combination of DNA-based techniques (direct DNA sequencing and/or allele-specific PCR) and protein-based IHC. IHC staining was assessed on a 0 to 3+ score scale, and a cutoff value of 2+ was used as positive by IHC. In the retrospective setting, statistical analyses of the data showed that the sensitivity of IHC was 90.9% and the specificity was 96.8%. Findings from the validation study demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of IHC were 88.2% and 100%, respectively. IHC with the novel mutation-specific antibody could be used as a screening method to assess the EGFR L858R mutation status in primary lung adenocarcinoma.