KIT Mutations Research Articles

Confirmed Systemic Mastocytosis in aPediatric Patient With Widespread Cutaneous Symptoms.

Mastocytosis is characterized by the clonal expansion of mast cells, with deposition into various organs and variable clinical presentation depending on subtype. It generally results from a mutation in the KIT gene, which encodes for production of receptor tyrosine kinases, the constitutive activity of which results in abnormal cell growth and proliferation. In pediatric patients, the cutaneous mastocytosis (CM) form predominates, and systemic mastocytosis (SM) is rarely reported. Accordingly, clinical course and management are not well described. We describe a case of SM in a 10-year-old child who was initially suspected of having widespread CM. The child had initially minimal systemic symptoms that are usually described in SM. Peripheral testing for the most common KIT mutation associated with constitutive activity, c-KIT D816V, in which aspartic acid is substituted for valine at position 816, was negative. Rising serum tryptase and increasing systemic symptoms of histamine release led to bone marrow biopsy, which was positive for the c-KIT D816V mutation and confirmed the diagnosis of indolent SM. The patient's response to treatment is briefly described, with exploration of treatment modalities described in previously reported cases. The case illustrates that, even in the absence of classic systemic symptoms, an index of suspicion for SM should be maintained, and highlights that peripheral testing for the c-KIT D816V mutation may be represent a false negative. Finally, we discuss that although antihistamines have historically formed the backbone of treatment in pediatric SM, the increasing availability of biological agents present possible new treatments with some success reported in the literature.

Peak part 1 summary: A phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical study of bezuclastinib (CGT9486) and sunitinib combination versus sunitinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

826 Background: After initial response to first line therapy with imatinib, GISTs commonly progress due to secondary resistance mutations in KIT. As the KIT mutation targeting profiles of bezuclastinib (type I TKI) and sunitinib are distinct, when combined they inhibit a broad spectrum of secondary KIT mutations. Herein we report extended experience of patients treated with 2 nd line combination bezuclastinib and sunitinib, including response assessment and safety. Methods: Peak (NCT05208047), a global randomized Phase 3, open-label study, aims to evaluate efficacy and safety of bezuclastinib + sunitinib vs sunitinib in GIST pts with imatinib intolerance or resistance. In Part 1a of the 3-part study, the dose of an optimized formulation of bezuclastinib was escalated in serial cohorts to achieve a target exposure comparable to that achieved at the RP2D established in the prior Phase 1b/2a study. Part 1b evaluated the interaction between bezuclastinib + sunitinib. Key inclusion: adult with locally advanced, metastatic and/or unresectable GIST, ≥1 measurable lesion according to modified RECIST v1.1, and ECOG PS 0 to 2. Part 1 completed enrollment in Apr 2023. Based upon PK and safety, a dose of bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD was selected for Part 2. All Part 1 data reported herein are as of Aug 2023; updated safety and efficacy will be presented. Results: Part 1 has completed enrollment with 19 pts in Part 1a and 23 in 1b. In Part 1a, Cohort 1 included 5 pts starting at bezuclastinib 300 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD; Cohort 2 included 14 pts at bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD. Pt characteristics in Part 1a+1b: median age - 60 yrs (range: 33-77); 81% men; 98% ECOG PS 0-1; 98% metastatic and 2% locally advanced. The majority of TEAEs were low grade and reversible with low rate (38%) of Grade 3+ events. There were limited (24%) dose reductions and infrequent (n=2) discontinuations due to TEAEs. Three pts experienced serious AEs possibly associated with study medications. In pts evaluable for response (received ≥1 cycle of study treatment and had assessments at baseline and post-baseline [n=40]), the objective response rate (ORR) was 20% (6 confirmed PRs, 2 unconfirmed PRs). Data remain immature to estimate median PFS for Part 1 pts. In a subset of pts with prior imatinib only (n=6), the closest approximation for pts enrolling in Part 2, the ORR was 33% (2 confirmed PRs). The majority of 2nd-line pts remain on treatment past 12 months. Conclusions: Data from Peak Part 1 show an encouraging safety and tolerability profile generally consistent with published sunitinib monotherapy experience. ORR in evaluable pts from Part 1 was 20%; ORR in 2 nd line pts was 33%. Part 2 of the Peak study is actively enrolling pts globally at the selected dose of bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD versus sunitinib 37.5 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT05208047 .

INSIGHT: A phase 3, randomized, open-label study of ripretinib vs sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor previously treated with imatinib with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations.

TPS848 Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common gastrointestinal sarcoma, with approximately 80% of cases driven by KIT mutations. Most patients (pts) with advanced GIST experience disease progression following first-line treatment with imatinib due to KIT secondary resistance mutations occurring most commonly in the ATP-binding pocket (exons 13/14) and/or activation loop (exons 17/18). Sunitinib is approved as second-line therapy for advanced GIST. Ripretinib is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for pts with GIST who received prior treatment with 3 or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. In the INTRIGUE phase 3 study (NCT03673501) in second-line therapy for advanced GIST, ripretinib was not superior to sunitinib in terms of progression-free survival (PFS); however, a more favorable safety profile was observed with ripretinib vs sunitinib (Bauer S et al. J Clin Oncol . 2022). Exploratory mutational analysis from INTRIGUE using baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) demonstrated that pts harboring primary KIT exon 11 mutations with secondary resistance mutations exclusively in KIT exons 17/18 derived PFS benefit with ripretinib vs sunitinib (median, 14.2 vs 1.5 months; HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.44; nominal P <0.0001; Heinrich MC et al. Nat Med . 2024). Here, we describe an ongoing phase 3 study for pts with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib harboring KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations. Methods: INSIGHT (NCT05734105) is a phase 3, randomized, open-label study designed to evaluate the efficacy of ripretinib vs sunitinib in pts with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib and who harbor KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations. Eligible pts must be ≥18 years old with histologically confirmed GIST and co-occurring KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations confirmed by ctDNA analysis. Pts must also have advanced disease with ≥1 measurable lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) v1.1, radiologic progression on imatinib, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2. Key exclusion criteria include a KIT exon 9, 13, or 14 mutation confirmed via ctDNA analysis at screening and prior treatment with another line of therapy in addition to imatinib for advanced GIST. A total of 54 pts will be randomized (2:1) to receive ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD; continuous) or sunitinib 50 mg QD (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) in 6-week cycles. The primary endpoint is PFS by independent radiologic review (IRR) per mRECIST v1.1; key secondary endpoints are objective response rate by IRR using mRECIST v1.1 and overall survival. Safety and patient-reported outcome measures will also be assessed. Pts randomized to the sunitinib arm may cross over to the ripretinib arm upon disease progression. This abstract was originally presented at ASCO 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05734105 .

Patient-derived xenograft models of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a ready-to-use platform for translational research.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. Most GIST harbor mutations in oncogenes, such as KIT, and are treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), such as imatinib. Most tumors develop secondary mutations inducing drug resistance against the available TKI, which requires novel therapies. We established a GIST patient-derived xenograft (PDX) platform of GIST that can be used for preclinical drug testing. Tumor tissue from consenting GIST patients was transplanted subcutaneously to NMRI nu/nu mice. Once tumor growth was observed, the tumor was re-transplanted to a next generation of mice. Tumors were characterized histopathologically and molecularly at every re-transplantation and compared with the original patient tumor. We transplanted 112 tumor samples from 99 GIST patients, resulting in 12 established and well-characterized GIST models with different mutations and TKI sensitivity. Three models harbor secondary KIT mutations. One model is characterized by a primary, imatinib-resistant PDGFRA exon 18 p.D842V mutation. Our established platform of well-characterized GIST PDX models, covering the most relevant driver mutations, serves as an excellent tool for preclinical drug testing and tumor biology studies.

Design, Synthesis, and SAR of Covalent KIT and PDGFRA Inhibitors─Exploring Their Potential in Targeting GIST.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), driven by KIT and PDGFRA mutations, are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have advanced treatment, resistance mutations and off-target toxicity limit their efficacy. This study develops covalent TKIs targeting drug-resistant GIST through structure-based design, synthesis, and biological evaluation. SAR studies provided key insights into mutant KIT and PDGFRA interactions, and the first crystal structure of PDGFRA bound to a covalent inhibitor is reported. These findings highlight the promise of covalent inhibitors for overcoming resistance and advancing safer, more effective therapies for advanced GIST.

Molecular profiling of acute myeloid leukemia with Runx1-Runx1t1 fusion

ABSTRACT Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematologic malignancy characterized by the clonal expansion of immature myeloid cells. Among the genetic alterations in AML, the RUNX1- RUNX1T1 fusion, resulting from the t (8; 21) (q22; q22.1) translocation, is common and linked with a favorable prognosis. However, the complete mutational profile contributing to leukemogenesis remains unclear. This study characterizes the mutational profile of the RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion in AML using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Methods Twenty-four newly diagnosed AML patients were selected. DNA and RNA were extracted from bone marrow aspirate samples, and libraries were prepared using the Ion AmpliSeq™ Library Kit. Sequencing was performed on the Ion S5™ system, and data were analyzed using Torrent Suite™ and Ion Reporter™ Software. Variants were annotated, and their clinical significance was assessed via ClinVar. In silico prediction tools, including SIFT and PolyPhen-2, were used for functional impact assessment. Results Patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion (n = 3) demonstrated higher initial peripheral blood and bone marrow blast counts and a pronounced prevalence of CD56 and CD19 positivity. The average number of mutations in KIT and NF1 was higher in the fusion group (p = 0.021 and p = 0.049, respectively). In total, 228 genetic variants were identified, with most associated with transcription/kinase signaling pathways (36.8%). Epigenetic regulators were the next most common category (21.5%). ClinVar data revealed pathogenic variants predominantly in the KIT gene, including two missense mutations, p.Asp816Val and p.Asp816Ala, at exon 17. Unique variants were identified exclusively in RUNX1-RUNX1T1 patients, including eight non-reported variants. Among these, a TET2 variant (p.Pro1367Leu) was predicted to have deleterious effects based on in silico tools. Conclusion The molecular profiling of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion offers crucial insights into AML’s genetic landscape. Identifying therapeutic targets and novel variants broadens our understanding of mutations, presenting new research opportunities and potential interventions.

PIK3CA Mutations and Co-Mutations in Operated Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

Background: Understanding PIK3CA mutations and co-mutations in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is critical to developing personalized treatment strategies. Therefore, this study aims to investigate PIK3CA mutations and the accompanying somatic variations in NSCLC. Methods: This retrospective study included 98 patients over 18 years of age who were diagnosed with NSCLC, operated on, and referred to the Molecular Pathology Laboratory between January 2019 and June 2024 for next-generation sequencing panel tests and ALK-ROS1 FISH analysis. Results: All patients were found to carry PIK3CA mutations. Among the 98 NSCLC patients analyzed, 16 (16.33%) were female and 82 (83.67%) were male. The average age of the patients was 64.53 ± 9.63 years, with an age range of 38-84 years, and the majority were 50 years or older. Of the cases, 51 presented the adenocarcinoma subtype, while the remaining 47 showed the squamous cell carcinoma subtype. A smoking history was present in 77 (78.57%) patients, while 21 (21.43%) had no smoking history. The most frequently detected pathogenic or likely pathogenic PIK3CA variations were c.1633G>A p.E545K (32.65%), c.1624G>A p.E542K (11.22%), c.3140A>G p.H1047R (11.22%), c.3140A>T p.H1047L (5.10%), c.1357G>C p.E453Q (4.08%), and c.3143A>G p.H1048R (2.04%). The top 10 mutations that most commonly accompanied PIK3CA variations were KRAS, NF1, TP53, EGFR, PTEN, BRAF, KIT, CDKN2A, SMARCA4, and ATM mutations, respectively. Conclusions:PIK3CA variations, along with other gene variations, may influence cancer progression and thus may play a crucial role in the determination of targeted treatment strategies.

Discovery of Potential Candidate Genes for Coat Colour in Wuzhishan Pigs by Integrating SNPs and mRNA Expression Analysis.

Despite identifying genes regulating the coat colour in Western pig breeds, the genetic basis of the coat colour in Chinese indigenous pigs is still not understood due to the diversity of indigenous breeds and their genetic differences from exotic pigs. In this study, 215 Wuzhishan pigs with three coat colour patterns (white, black, and black-back/white-belly) were used to conduct a genome-wide association analysis. We found that genes responsible for the coat colour in the Wuzhishan breed are located on chromosome 8. Ninety-seven genome-wide significant SNPs are related to the animal's coat colour. Using a haplotype-sharing analysis, we narrowed the potential candidate region to a 10.1 Mb interval encompassing only one gene, RAPGEF2, which participates in the regulation of melanogenesis. Two additional candidate genes, PDGFRA and KIT, are located within 1 Mb of the genome-wide significant SNPs. Gene ontology analysis and literature mining suggest that these candidate genes are associated with the animal's coat colour. mRNA expression results revealed that RAPGEF2 and PDGFRA had significantly higher expressions in black pigs than in white pigs and higher expressions in black skin than in white skin from the same black-back/white-belly pigs. These results suggest that RAPGEF2 and PDGFRA are potential candidate genes regulating the coat colour in Wuzhishan pigs. Interestingly, mutations of KIT (a gene duplication and a G to A substitution at the splicing site in intron 17) were detected in white Wuzhishan pigs but not in black-back/white-belly or black pigs, suggesting a close genetic relationship between white Wuzhishan pigs and Western white pig breeds. In summary, these results indicate that the expression of RAPGEF2 and PDGFRA may cause the coat colour variation by influencing the deposition of melanin, while the mutation of KIT causes the white coat colour. Our results may provide a theoretical basis for the breeding of white coat colour Wuzhishan pigs, and shed light on the complex genetic background of coat colour variations in indigenous Chinese pig breeds.

WITHDRAWN: Gene mutations in Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): Advances in treatment and mechanism research

Though gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has been reported in patients of all ages, its diagnosis is more common in elders. The two most common types of mutation, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor a (PDGFRA) mutations, hold about 75% and 15% of GISTs cases, respectively. Tumors without KIT or PDGFRA mutations are known as wild type (WT)-GISTs, which takes up for 15% of all cases. WT-GISTs have other genetic alterations, including mutations of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and serine-threonine protein kinase BRAF and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Other GISTs without any of the above genetic mutations are named “quadruple WT” -GISTs. More types of rare mutations are being reported. These mutations or gene fusions were initially thought to be mutually exclusive in primary GISTs, but recently it has been reported that some of these rare mutations co-exist with KIT or PDGFRA mutations. The treatment and management differ according to molecular subtypes of GISTs. Especially for patients with late-stage tumors, developing a personalized chemotherapy regimen based on mutation status is of great help to improve patient survival and quality of life. At present, imatinib mesylate (IM) is an effective first-line drug for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic recurrent GISTs, but how to overcome drug resistance is still an important clinical problem. The effectiveness of other drugs is being further evaluated. The progress in the study of relevant mechanisms also provides the possibility to develop new targets or new drugs.

Mutational Landscape of KIT Proto-Oncogene Coding Sequence in 62 Canine Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Mast Cell Tumors.

Canine mast cell tumors (MCTs) are common skin neoplasms with varying biological behaviors. The KIT proto-oncogene plays a key role in the development of these tumors, and internal tandem duplications on exon 11 are usually associated with more aggressive behavior, increased local recurrence, and decreased survival time. However, apart from exons 8-11 and 17, there is limited understanding of the overall KIT mutational landscape in canine MCTs. This work aims to analyze the entire KIT coding sequence (21 exons) in a cohort of 62 MCTs, which included 38 cutaneous and 24 subcutaneous tumors, and potentially identify new variants. In addition to confirming previously reported activating KIT mutations in exons 8, 9, and 11, we identified new variants in exons 2, 3, 5, 16, and the 3' untranslated region (UTR). Notably, these last variants include an amino acid change (Asp/His) in exon 16. Additionally, we confirmed a differential prevalence of KIT variants in cutaneous and subcutaneous MCTs. These findings enhance our understanding of the KIT proto-oncogene coding sequence and provide valuable information for future confirmatory studies.

Pathologic diagnosis and molecular features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a mini-review.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal, predominantly affecting the stomach and small intestine, with rare occurrences in the duodenum, rectum, and extraintestinal sites. Histologically, GISTs can present as spindle cells, epithelioid cells, or mixed morphologies, with immunohistochemical staining revealing expression of KIT (CD117) and discovered on GIST 1 (DOG1). Approximately 80% of GISTs harbor activating mutations in KIT or platelet derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA), which influence their clinical behavior and treatment response. SDH-deficient GISTs, associated with syndromes such as Carney triad and Carney-Stratakis syndrome, represent a distinct subgroup with unique characteristics and management challenges. The standard treatment includes surgery and imatinib for metastatic cases; however, resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors remains a significant hurdle, especially in pediatric and wildtype GISTs. This highlights the need for advanced therapeutic strategies and emphasizes the importance of molecular profiling in guiding treatment decisions and improving outcomes for GIST patients.

Prognostic Significance of C-MYC and EGFR Overexpression in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: An Immunohistochemical Study.

In addition to mutations in KIT and PDGFRA, many other genetic alterations have been described in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), including amplifications of C-MYC and EGFR, which are often associated with increased protein expression. The main of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of C-MYC and EGFR expression in GISTs using immunohistochemistry (IHC). We collected all GIST cases over a 16-year period. These cases were tested using antibodies against C-MYC (Leica, clone EP121) and EGFR (Leica, clone 113). C-MYC staining was assessed using the H-score method for nuclear, cytoplasmic, and combined staining. For EGFR staining (either cytoplasmic or nuclear), the intensity was graded as follows: 0 (no staining), 1 (weak staining), 2 (moderate staining), and 3 (strong staining). The percentage of positive cells was evaluated using a semiquantitative approach. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS24. A total of 37 cases were included in our study. Nuclear expression of C-MYC was observed in 43% of the cases, with a high H-score in 43%. A statistically significant association was found between a high nuclear H-score for C-MYC and mitotic rate (P=0.046), as well as a high Ki-67 proliferation rate (P=0.046). However, no statistically significant associations were identified between the nuclear H-score of C-MYC and other clinical, pathologic, or survival data. Cytoplasmic expression of C-MYC was noted in 22% of cases, but no significant correlations were found with the clinicopathological data. EGFR staining was observed in 86% of cases, with a high score of 51%. EGFR expression was significantly associated with the mitotic index (P=0.012) and Ki-67 proliferation rate (P=0.046). Our findings suggest that both C-MYC and EGFR may be overexpressed and/or amplified in GISTs, indicating their potential prognostic role. This could also pave the way for therapeutic strategies targeting these proteins.

Elevated serum direct bilirubin is predictive of a poor prognosis for primary myelodysplastic syndrome

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of serum direct bilirubin (DBIL) for patients newly diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).MethodsThe clinical, laboratory, and follow-up data of MDS patients were collected, and the associations of DBIL levels with overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were analyzed.ResultIn total, 262 MDS patients were assigned to the high DBIL level group or the normal DBIL level group in the retrospective study. High DBIL was associated with older age, reduced hemoglobin, higher levels of β2-microglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, and serum ferritin, along with the number of co-mutations (> 1) and a higher frequency of ASXL1, KIT, and KRAS mutations. Multivariate analyses found that high DBIL level was an independent adverse predictor for OS (p = 0.002, hazard ratio = 2.723, 95%CI = 1.442–5.143) but not for LFS (p = 0.057, hazard ratio = 1.678, 95%CI = 0.986–2.857). A novel nomogram based on DBIL, sex, age, β2-microglobulin, lactate dehydrogenase, the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) was constructed, which demonstrated superior accuracy compared with the IPSS-R (C-index, 0.790 vs. 0.731, respectively).ConclusionAn elevated DBIL level was identified as an independent adverse prognostic factor for MDS patients. An individualized prediction model was established and validated to improve prediction of OS and LFS.

Sitravatinib in patients with solid tumors selected by molecular alterations: results from a Phase Ib study.

Aim: We report clinical activity and safety of sitravatinib in patients with advanced cancer from basket cohorts with specific molecular alterations, in a Phase Ib study.Materials & methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors harboring amplification, mutation, or rearrangement of MET, AXL, RET, NTRK, DDR2, KDR, PDGFRA, KIT or CBL received sitravatinib once daily. Primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR).Results: In total, 113 patients were enrolled following a median of 3 (range 1-18) prior systemic regimens. Altered RET (n = 31), CBL (n = 31) and MET (n = 17) were most frequent cohorts. Overall, 68.9% had reduced tumor volume and most (61.5%) had a best objective response of stable disease. ORR was highest in patients with RET-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (21.1%) but did not differ significantly from the null hypothesis (ORR ≤15%; p = 0.316). Median progression-free survival and overall survival (5.7 and 24.2 months, respectively) were also longest in the RET-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer cohort. Diarrhea (61.1%), fatigue (50.4%) and hypertension (46.9%) were the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild-to-moderate in severity. The study closed before the planned number of patients were enrolled in all cohorts.Conclusion: Sitravatinib had a manageable safety profile with modest signals of clinical activity in patients with molecularly selected solid tumors.Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT02219711.

Ultra-Sensitive KIT testing Uncovers Previously Undetected KIT mutations in Patients with Indolent Systemic Mastocytosis: Results from the Pioneer Trial

Ultra-Sensitive KIT testing Uncovers Previously Undetected KIT mutations in Patients with Indolent Systemic Mastocytosis: Results from the Pioneer Trial

Driver mutations associated with signatures of platinum sensitivity in germ cell tumors

We sought to evaluate the genomic and transcriptomic landscapes in primary and metastatic germ cell tumors (GCTs; N = 138) to uncover factors that drive cisplatin resistance. Prevalence was calculated for platinum-resistant alterations (PRAs; KRAS, TP53, and KIT mutations, and MDM2 amplification) and high copy number amplifications (CNA ≥ 6 copies). Tumors were designated as chemo-naïve (PreC, N = 66) or post-chemotherapy (PostC, N = 17). A transcriptomic signature associated with platinum sensitivity (PSS, high suggests increased sensitivity) was applied. KIT mutations were observed in 14.5% of primary versus 1.8% of met and 0% of lymph. TP53 mutations were identified in 10% of primary GCTs versus 17% of met and 16.7% of lymph. MDM2 CNAs were similar between sites. PRA-positive PreC GCTs had significantly lower average PSS scores compared to PRA-negative tumors. Lower PSS scores in chemo-naïve tumors were associated with PRAs, suggesting a potential mechanism for platinum resistance.

Genetic Characteristics of Cutaneous, Acral, and Mucosal Melanoma in Japan.

Acral and mucosal melanomas are more prevalent in Asians than in Caucasians, unlike cutaneous melanomas, which are predominant in Caucasians. Recent studies have suggested that non-Caucasian cutaneous melanomas responded less to immune checkpoint inhibitors, highlighting the need for genetic profiling across ethnicities. This study aimed to elucidate the genetic characteristics of Japanese melanomas, which is an under-researched topic. Single-nucleotide variants, indels, and copy number alterations in 104 Japanese melanoma patients (37 cutaneous, 52 acral, and 15 mucosal) were analyzed using custom panel sequencing. Driver events were detected in 94% of the cases. Among cutaneous melanoma cases, 76% had BRAF mutations, and 8% had NRAS mutations. In acral melanoma, BRAF (9%), NRAS (17%), KRAS (8%), KIT (19%), and NF1 (7%) mutations were detected. Major driver mutations in mucosal melanoma were detected in NRAS, KRAS, NF1, PTEN, GNAQ, and KIT. The median tumor mutational burden across all melanoma types was 4.6 mutations/Mb, with no significant difference between the cutaneous and acral/mucosal types. Of the 21 patients with both primary and metastatic lesions, 11 showed distinct mutations in each. Potentially actionable mutations were detected in 58 patients in addition to BRAF V600E/K mutations in 31. This study highlights distinct genetic abnormalities and actionable alterations in Japanese melanoma patients. This suggests a lower tumor mutational burden in East Asian cutaneous melanoma, which may affect the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The heterogeneity of driver mutations across and within individuals highlights the need for personalized treatment approaches.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) in children: An update of this orphan disease

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are tumours of the digestive tract that mainly develop in adults. Recommendations for the management of GIST in pediatrics are limited. We performed an updated review of the literature serving as a basis for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations for GIST in children and young adults (YA). GIST in pediatric population can have a sporadic presentation but occur more often in a syndromic and/or familial context. Currently more than 170 cases of sporadic GIST or in association with Carney-Stratakis syndrome or Carney's triad family cases of familial GIST have been described in children and YA. These syndromes are frequently associated with germline or somatic alterations in a sub-unit of Succinate Dehydrogenase (SDH). In contrast, the frequency of somatic KIT and PDGFRα oncogene mutations (±15%) is significantly lower as compared to adults with GIST. The recommendations for the management of children with GIST are generally comparable to those used for adult patients, although certain biological differences influence the therapeutic attitude. International collaborations have been deployed in order to increase the clinical and biological knowledge of this orphan pathology in pediatrics.

Can molecular patterns help to classify overlapping entities in myeloid neoplasms?

Myeloid neoplasms include myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic neoplasms and acute myeloid leukaemia. Historically, these diseases have been diagnosed based on clinicopathological features with sometimes arbitrary thresholds that have persisted even as molecular features were gradually incorporated into their classification. As such, although current diagnostic approaches can classify the majority of myeloid neoplasms accurately using a combination of molecular and clinicopathological features, some areas of overlap persist and occasionally pose diagnostic challenges. These include overlap across BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms; between clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance and myelodysplastic neoplasms; myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms; and, detection of KIT mutations in myeloid neoplasms other than mastocytosis, raising the prospect of systemic mastocytosis. Molecular testing has become state of the art in the diagnostic work-up of myeloid neoplasms, and molecular patterns can inherently help to classify overlapping entities if considered within a framework of haematological presentations. For future development, molecular testing will likely include whole genome and transcriptome sequencing, and primarily molecular classifications of myeloid neoplasms have already been suggested. As such, genetically defined groups should still constitute the basis for our understanding of disease development from early onset to progression, while clinicopathological features could then be used to describe the stage of the disease rather than the specific type of myeloid neoplasm.

Unraveling Gastric and Small Intestine Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Review of Our Current Knowledge

Background: Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) are characterized as round, well–defined mass lesions in the submucosal layer of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. GISTs often present histological diversity and mutations in c-KIT and PDGFRA genes. Symptoms usually appear as abdominal pain, often accompanied by gastrointestinal bleeding or abdominal mass. The prognosis relies on tumor size, mitotic index, and different mutations, such as KIT mutations. There are a variety of diagnostic measures in the case of GISTs. However, it is important to note that ultrasound is the most common and reliable method for diagnosing gastric GISTs. The treatment methods followed vary from preoperative systemic therapy to surgical interventions. Depending on the type of GIST, professionals decide upon the best treatment plan for the patient. Objective: This review aims to inform the scientific community about the intricacies of gastric and small intestine GISTs to enhance understanding and improve patient management, with a particular focus on the importance of understanding and interpreting the unique microscopic histopathological findings of GISTs.