Multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (MEN1) is a rare hereditary tumor syndrome, transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait, caused by mutations in the MEN1 gene encoding menin, a 610-amino-acid tumor suppressor protein, widely expressed in both endocrine and nonendocrine tissues (1). In fact, MEN1 patients display a large spectrum of benign and malignant endocrine lesions, including hyperparathyroidism as well as pituitary and enteropancreatic tumors, and also nonendocrine tumors (e.g. lipomas, skin tumors, and meningiomas). Germline heterozygous loss-of-function mutations are generally found in MEN1 patients, and additional somatic loss of heterozygosity in the MEN1 locus leads to the lack of both MEN1 alleles in tumors, with acquisition of a homozygous recessive state at the tissue level (2, 3). MEN1 syndrome frequently exhibits a familial pattern, whereas only the minority of affected individuals present as a simplex, or sporadic, case defined as a single occurrence of MEN1 syndrome in a family. Generally, MEN1 germline mutations are identified with an average prevalence of 70% in the familial forms, whereas the sporadic cases, associated with de novo mutation of the MEN1 gene, represent about 10% of cases. According to this, a crucial issue is still represented by some clinical phenotypes presenting as a MEN1-related status in which MEN1 gene analysis failed to detect germline mutations: MEN1 variants and MEN1 phenocopies. MEN1 variants can be defined as differing clinical expressions from one gene such as familial isolated hyperparathyroidism (FIHP) in which germline mutations in MEN1 gene have been reported with a different prevalence in families with FIHP (4–6). Instead, a MEN1 phenocopy consists of a trait that strongly resembles a MEN1 phenotype in a patient or a family without identified MEN1 mutation and not related to the gene itself (7). A practical example could be a case of FIHP in which MEN1 mutation analysis results negative, being caused by mutation in another familial hyperparathyroidism-related gene, such as either the calcium-sensing receptor gene (8), whose inactivating mutations account for familial hypocalciuria hypercalcemia syndrome, or the HRPT2 gene responsible for the hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome (9). Recently described is an interesting small family meeting the criteria of MEN1 but exhibiting atypical MEN1 tumors such as somatotropinoma and renal angiomyolipoma associated to the more typical parathyroid tumors (10). No MEN1 germline mutation was detected in affected members, whereas they had a CDKN1B mutation linked to their MEN1 trait (10). Interestingly, a spontaneous strain of rat shows a similar spectrum of tumors caused by homozygous mutation of Cdkn1b (10). Thus, this phenotype may represent a rare and important phenocopy of classic MEN1, but more families will need to be studied to understand the complete phenotype. Concerning the possible causes of nondetection of MEN1 mutation, several points have to be addressed, as also made by Agarwal et al. (11) in this issue of The Journal. First, the germline mutation could rely on regulatory/noncoding regions of the gene, such as the promoter region. Currently, such mutations of the MEN1 gene have not been reported. Second, the germline mutation could consist of a large deletion of MEN1 gene, but it seems to rarely occur, being found in approximately 4% of cases (12, 13). Consequently, the attention of researchers has to be directed to look for other causes that could explain both the MEN1-related clinical phenotype and the nondetection of MEN1 mutation, such as the involvement of other genes. In the last decade, menin has been reported to interact with a multitude of proteins including jun D proto-oncogene, Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog family members, Pem, nuclear factorB, Fanconi anemia complementation group D2, Replication Protein A2, Nonmuscle Myosin IIA, glial fibrillary acidic protein, vimentin, and heat-shock protein 70, although to date none of the interacting partners have been directly proven important in MEN1 pathophysiology (14). Moreover, it has been hypothesized that menin mediates its tumor suppressor action by regulating histone methylation in promoters of HOX genes and/or CDKN2C,CDKN1B, andpossiblyother cyclin-dependent kinase