Multivisceral Resection Research Articles

Long-term quality of life after resection of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma

IntroductionRetroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS) is characterized by high recurrence rates. Since complete tumor resection, often necessitating multivisceral resection, enables long-term survival in both primary and recurrent disease, health related quality of life (QoL) after RPS resection has attracted increasing interest. However, data regarding this topic is limited. Here, we multidimensionally assessed long-term QoL after RPS resection. MethodsFive previously validated (1. EORTC QLQ-C30, 2. WEMWBS, 3. FoP-Q-SF, 4. PC-PTSD, 5. Pro-CTCAE) were sent to patients having undergone resection of primary, recurrent and metastasized RPS at Heidelberg University Hospital between 10/2001 and 12/2020. Multivariable linear regression models were used to test associations between clinical/demographic variables and patient reported outcomes (PROs). ResultsQuestionnaires were answered by 127 patients (71% response rate). The median interval between RPS diagnosis and assessment of PROs was 80 months. The overall Global Health score was 64.1 and comparable to the general German population. RPS patients reported deficits regarding emotional and social functioning, whereas physical limitations were less pronounced. Besides diarrhea, abdominal symptoms were comparable to the overall population. Tumor recurrences, the number of surgeries, multivisceral resections or postoperative complications did not significantly affect long-term QoL ratings. ConclusionRPS patients rate their QoL relatively high, even after multiple and multivisceral resections. Psychosocial well-being should be monitored in follow-up sessions to offer tailored support if necessary, thus improving postoperative care.

Distal Pancreatectomy: Extent of Resection Determines Surgical Risk Categories.

Recently, subclassification of pancreatoduodenectomy in 4 differing types has been reported, because additional major vascular and multivisceral resections have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. To classify distal pancreatectomy (DP) based on the extent of resection and technical difficulty and to evaluate postoperative outcomes with regards to this classification system. All consecutive patients who had undergone DP between 2001 and 2020 in a high-volume pancreatic surgery center were included in this study. DPs were subclassified into 4 distinct categories reflecting the extent of resection and technical difficulty, including standard DP (type 1), DP with venous (type 2), multivisceral (type 3), or arterial resection (type 4). Patient characteristics, perioperative data, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed and compared among the 4 groups. A total of 2135 patients underwent DP. Standard DP was the most frequently performed procedure (64.8%). The overall 90-day mortality rate was 1.6%. Morbidity rates were higher in patients with additional vascular or multivisceral resections, and 90-day mortality gradually increased with the extent of resection from standard DP to DP with arterial resection (type 1: 0.7%; type 2: 1.3%; type 3: 3%; type 4: 8.7%; P <0.0001). Multivariable analysis confirmed the type of DP as an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality. Postoperative outcomes after DP depend on the extent of resection and correlate with the type of DP. The implementation of the 4-type classification system allows standardized reporting of surgical outcomes after DP improving comparability of future studies.

Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Rate After Colorectal Surgery at the Philippine General Hospital

Objective: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common healthcare-associated infections. This study aimed to determine SSI rate and the associated factors among colorectal surgery patients. Methods: This included adult patients who underwent surgery under the Division of Colorectal Surgery from January to May 2018. Clinico-demographic, operative, and SSI outcome data were reviewed. Occurrence of SSI during admission until discharge, and up to 30 days after the surgery was analyzed. Results: A total of 172 surgeries were performed. Majority were elective procedures (68.0%) and performed via open approach (67.4%). Most were malignant cases (62.6%). Sixty-three colorectal resections were done (41 colon and 22 rectal). SSI rate prior to discharge was 6.4%, and15.7% at 30 days. Among colorectal resections, 18 (28.6%) patients had SSI at 30 days. SSI rates were significantly higher among patients who were ASA 2 or 3; received chemotherapy 12 weeks prior to surgery; had malignant pathology; underwent emergency surgery; received perioperative transfusion; had stapled skin closure; had low anterior resection for rectal cancer; and had multivisceral resection. Conclusion: The Division of Colorectal Surgery at the Philippine General Hospital had a higher SSI rate as compared to literature. Although this could be partly explained by the differences in patient and surgeon population, improving on SSI rates will be the unit’s goal. Continued SSI surveillance with more patient accrual may provide better insight to the associated risk factors. Key words: Surgical site infection, colorectal surgery, risk factors

Incidence of synchronous and metachronous peritoneal metastases for gallblader cancer: A single-center cohort analysis.

e16191 Background: The impact of synchronous and metachronous peritoneal metastases (s-pm, m-pm) on survival after curative resection for gallbladder cancer (GBCa) is poorly studied. The anatomy of the gallbladder and its proximity to the liver as well as to the peritoneum has already been included in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gallbladder cancer with regard to the tumor location (peritoneal vs. hepatic). However, studies regarding the tumor location and differentiating the impact of peritoneal metastases are needed. Methods: At the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, a total of 1979 patients with the general diagnosis of cholangiocellular carcinoma were discussed in interdisciplinary tumor conferences from 2010 to 2022. Results: GBCa was present in 316 cases indicating resection for 168 patients. Out of these, 123 patients ultimately underwent curative resection, whereas 45 patients were found to be inoperable due to advanced tumor disease intraoperatively. The 123 curative resections included limited s-pm for seven patients diagnosed incidentally. Here s-pm were evident across all T stages, with one T1V0R0 and one T2V0R1 stage each, T3V1R0 twice, and T3Pn1R1 and T4Pn1R1 once each. Postoperative complications occurred in three of these seven patients (according to Clavien-Dindo): two grade 1; and only one patient grade 3a, requiring a CT drainage. Metachronous metastases, diagnosed in eleven patients after 16.9 months on average with a mean overall survival (OS) of 9.18 months, showed no postoperative complications after the initial surgery. Here T2-status was present in six patients, T3-status in four patients (three T2V0, three T3V0). Complete radical resection (R0) was achieved in six patients, while R1 was recorded in three patients. Furthermore, five patients showed simultaneous hepatic metastases and one of them in parallel osseous metastases. While no neoadjuvant oncologic therapy was performed in any of these eleven patients, adjuvant therapy was applied in nine patients prior to the diagnosis of m-pm. Again, a total of five patients received palliative therapy after diagnosis of m-pm. Nevertheless, four patients underwent reoperation; two cases were treated with cytoreductive surgery including multivisceral resections, while one patient underwent PIPAC twice as an individual tumor approach; the fourth patient underwent surgical exploration for ascites drainage placement. Conclusions: The primary aim regarding the seven s-pm patients was immediate postoperative surgical outcome without complications (&gt;3a according to Clavien-Dindo) and was feasible, regarding the prognostic impact of s-pm for surgical resectability; curative resection might be an option. The primary aim for m-pm was OS, while promising outcomes were shown in this study.

Preoperative radiotherapy for select T4 primary and locally recurrent colon cancers: Experience from an Australian quaternary centre.

e15656 Background: We report our experience with preoperative radiotherapy for select T4 primary or locally recurrent colon cancers in a single, quaternary institution. Methods: A total of 89 patients with T4 primary (n = 40) and locally recurrent (n = 49) adenocarcinoma of the colon ( &gt; 15 cm from the anal verge) underwent preoperative-intent radiotherapy in our centre from 2005 to 2020. Majority of the tumours arose from the sigmoid, 79% (n = 29) for the T4 primary group and 68% (n = 32) for the locally recurrent group. The most common tumour sites prior to preoperative radiotherapy in the locally recurrent group were the lateral pelvic brim (n = 24; left = 16; right = 8), and the proximal presacral area (n = 13). Of the evaluable patients, 95.8% (23/24) of the T4 primary group and 91.3% (21/23) of the locally recurrent group were MMR-proficient. Preoperative radiotherapy prescription was 45-50.4 Gy given in 1.8-2 Gy per fraction. Concurrent 5-FU based chemotherapy was given in 95% (n = 38) of the T4 primary group and 95.9% (n = 47) locally recurrent group. Median follow-up time was 48.9 months (range, 31.5- 80.7) for the T4 primary group and 43.1 months (range, 24.2- 74.1) for the locally recurrent group. Results: In the T4 primary group, downstaging of the pre-treatment clinical stage was documented in 57.5% (n = 23) and curative-intent surgery was possible in 90% (n = 36), 80.5% (n = 29) of which were R0 resections. On the other hand, curative-intent surgery was possible in 79.6% (n = 39) of the locally recurrent group, 64% (n = 25) of which were R0 resections. Of the patients who underwent surgery, 22% (n = 8) in the T4 primary group and 41% (n = 16) in the locally recurrent group avoided a multi-visceral resection. A pathologic complete response was achieved in 8.3% (n = 3) in the T4 primary group and in 10.3% (n = 4) in the locally recurrent group. For the T4 primary group, 13% had local failures (Hazard rate 3%, 95% CI 1-6%), 38% had any disease progression (Hazard Rate 9%; 95% CI 5-14), and 45% died (Hazard Rate 8%; 95% CI 5-13) during the follow-up period. For the locally recurrent group, 35% had local failures (Hazard Rate 13%, 95 CI 9-19), 61% had any disease progression (Hazard Rate 20%, 95% CI 14-29), and 60% died (13%, 95% CI 9-19) the follow-up period. Grade 1-2 anastomotic leak occurred in a total of 6 (8%) patients, 3 in each group. Readmission after surgery was needed in a total of 17 (22.6%) patients, 4 in the T4 primary group and 13 in the locally recurrent group. There was no 30-day mortality in the entire cohort. Conclusions: Curative-intent resection may be achieved after preoperative radiotherapy for select T4 primary and locally recurrent colon cancer, which may translate in encouraging clinical outcomes for an advanced cohort of patients. Careful patient selection is required to identify which colon cancer patients may benefit with preoperative radiotherapy.

Cytoreductive Surgery with HIPEC as Primary Treatment for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Upfront or Interval-ISPSM Collaborative Study.

Cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC has shown promising results in the interval setting of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Its role in upfront setting has not yet been established. All eligible patients underwent CRS-HIPEC as per institution protocol. Relevant data was collected prospectively in institutional HIPEC registry and analyzed retrospectively for the study period from February 2014 to February 2020. Out of 190 patients, 80 underwent CRS-HIPEC in upfront setting and 110 in interval setting. The median age was 54 ± 7.45years, upfront group had higher PCI (14.1 ± 8.75 vs. 9.6 ± 5.2. 2), and required longer duration of surgery (10.6 ± 1.73 vs. 8.4 ± 1.71h) had more blood loss (1025 ± 668.76 vs. 680 ± 302.23ml). The upfront group required more diaphragmatic resections, bowel resections, and multivisceral resections. The overall G3-G4 morbidity was comparable (25.4% vs. 27.3%), upfront group had more surgical morbidity (20% vs. 9.1%) whereas interval group had more medical morbidity, i.e., electrolyte imbalance and hematological. After a median follow-up of 43months, median DFS was 33months in the upfront vs. 30months in the interval group, p = 0.75, median OS was 46months interval group and was not yet achieved in upfront group.(p = 0.13). Four-year OS was 85% vs. 60%. In patients of advanced EOC upfront CRS HIPEC showed promising outcomes and trend towards better survival with similar morbidity and mortality. The upfront group had more surgical morbidity whereas interval group had more medical morbidity. Multiinstitutional randomized studies are needed to define patient selection and study morbidity patterns and compare the outcomes between CRS-HIPEC in the upfront and interval setting for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Significant Predictors of Postoperative Morbidity After Radical Resection of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in a Tertiary Center.

The safety of multivisceral resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma is an issue. Previous reports have investigated its associations with the pattern of resection and factors recognized mostly per operatively. All consecutive RPS resections from May 2015 to April 2022 were studied retrospectively with respect to adverse events. Two univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations between severe adverse events and factors recognized pre- and per operatively. Associations of adverse events with overall survival (OS) and local recurrence (LR) were investigated. A total of 265 surgical interventions corresponding to 251 patients were recorded(38 RPS surgeries/year). Severe postoperative adverse events (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) occurred in 50 patients (18.9%), 15 (5.6%) patients underwent an iterative laparotomy, and 6 patients (2.3%) died within 90 days. On multivariate analysis including all parameters known preoperatively, male sex, performance status, dedifferentiated liposarcoma histology, and low serum albumin level were found to be significant predictors of major complications, whereas the timing of surgery and preoperative treatment were not. On univariate analysis including all per operative parameters, transfusion requirement, operative time, number of digestive anastomoses, and pancreas and/or major arterial resection were found to entail higher operative risk. On multivariate analysis, only transfusion requirement was significant. There was no impact of postoperative adverse events on OS or LR. The recognition of preoperative parameters that impact safety could mitigate the extent of the surgery, specifically the resection of adherent organs not overtly invaded. For the best decision, this surgery should be performed in referral centers.

Use of ileostomy versus colostomy as a bridge to surgery in left-sided obstructive colon cancer: retrospective cohort study

Colorectal cancer causes the majority of large bowel obstructions and surgical resection remains the gold standard for curative treatment. There is evidence that a deviating stoma as a bridge to surgery can reduce postoperative mortality rate; however, the optimal stoma type is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between ileostomy and colostomy as a bridge to surgery in left-sided obstructive colon cancer. This was a national, retrospective population-based cohort study with 75 contributing hospitals. Patients with radiological left-sided obstructive colon cancer between 2009 and 2016, where a deviating stoma was used as a bridge to surgery, were included. Exclusion criteria were palliative treatment intent, perforation at presentation, emergency resection, and multivisceral resection. A total of 321 patients underwent a deviating stoma; 41 (12.7 per cent) ileostomies and 280 (87.2 per cent) colostomies. The ileostomy group had longer length of stay (median 13 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 10-16) versus 9 (i.q.r. 6-14) days, P = 0.003) and more nutritional support during the bridging interval. Both groups showed similar complication rates in the bridging interval and after primary resection, including anastomotic leakage. Stoma reversal during resection was more common in the colostomy group (9 (22.0 per cent) versus 129 (46.1 per cent) for ileostomy and colostomy respectively, P = 0.006). This study demonstrated that patients having a colostomy as a bridge to surgery in left-sided obstructive colon cancer had a shorter length of stay and lower need for nutritional support. No difference in postoperative complications were found.

Current Approaches for the Curative-Intent Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Radical resection is the only curative treatment for pancreatic cancer. However, only up to 20% of patients are considered eligible for surgical resection at the time of diagnosis. Although upfront surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy has become the gold standard of treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer there are numerous ongoing trials aiming to compare the clinical outcomes of various surgical strategies (e.g., upfront surgery or neoadjuvant treatment with subsequent resection). Neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery is considered the best approach in borderline resectable pancreatic tumors. Individuals with locally advanced disease are now candidates for palliative chemo- or chemoradiotherapy; however, some patients may become eligible for resection during the course of such treatment. When metastases are found, the cancer is qualified as unresectable. It is possible to perform radical pancreatic resection with metastasectomy in selected cases of oligometastatic disease. The role of multi-visceral resection, which involves reconstruction of major mesenteric veins, is well known. Nonetheless, there are some controversies in terms of arterial resection and reconstruction. Researchers are also trying to introduce personalized treatments. The careful, preliminary selection of patients eligible for surgery and other therapies should be based on tumor biology, among other factors. Such selection may play a key role in improving survival rates in patients with pancreatic cancer.

The significance of peri-neural invasion in patients with gallbladder carcinoma after curative surgery: a 10year experience in China.

The significance of peri-neural invasion (PNI) in patients with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) after curative surgery remains unknown. Current study was performed to evaluate the significance of PNI in resected GBC patients in terms of tumor-related biological features and long-term survival. Patients with GBC between September 2010 and September 2020 were reviewed and analyzed. SPSS 25.0 software were used for statistical analysis. A total of 324 resected GBC patients were identified (No. PNI: 64). An elevated preoperative Ca19.9 level (P = 0.001), obstructive jaundice (P = 0.001), liver invasion (P < 0.0001), lymph-vascular invasion (P < 0.0001), lymph-node metastasis (P < 0.0001), and poor or moderate differentiation status (P = 0.036) were more frequently detected in patients with PNI. Major hepatectomy (P = 0.019), bile duct resection (P < 0.0001), combined multi-visceral resections (P = 0.001), and combined major vascular resections and reconstructions (P = 0.002) were also more frequently detected. However, a significantly lower R0 rate (P < 0.0001) was acquired in patients with PNI. Patients with PNI were generally more advanced disease and shared a much worse prognosis even after matching. PNI was an independent prognostic factor of disease-free survival as well as an independent predictor of early recurrence. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has brought an obvious survival benefit in resected GBC patients with PNI. PNI could be regarded as an indicator of worse prognosis and could serve as an independent predictor of early recurrence. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was correlated with an improved survival for resected GBC patients with PNI. Upcoming multicenter studies covering various races are warranted for further validation.

Morbimortality after 1321 consecutive CRS + HIPEC procedures: seeking excellence in surgery for peritoneal surface malignancy.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) treatment has classically presented a percentage of associated complications that have limited its expansion. The aim of this study is to describe the morbimortality results obtained from a referral center implemented with the support of a governmental health agency and directed by a surgical team experienced in CRS for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (PSM). Data from the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Program of Catalonia (PCPC) prospective database, including patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC between September 2006 and January 2021, were analyzed. A total of 1151 consecutive patients underwent 1321 CRS + HIPEC procedures. Colonic origin of peritoneal metastasis was the most frequent (47.3%). Median PCI was 7 and most patients had CC0-1 (96.1%). Multivisceral resection was performed in 44% of all patients, 57% required digestive anastomosis. Median hospital stay was 11days (range 6-144days). High-grade complications occurred in 20% of all patient, most of them surgical complications. Anastomotic leak occurred in 0.6% of all cases. The overall in-stay and 30-day mortality rate was 0.4%. The low-rate of complications and the high rate of complete CRS were achieved from the beginning of the PCPC. Median overall survival was 54.7months, with a 5-year survival rate of 47.5%. Implementation of a CRS + HIPEC referral program for the treatment of PSM with preferably an experienced surgical team enables acceptable rates of severe morbidity (20%) and mortality (< 1%).

Morbidity and mortality of multivisceral resection with radical nephrectomy for locally advanced renal cell carcinoma: An analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

Locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can rarely invade into adjacent abdominal viscera without clinical evidence of distant metastases. The role of multivisceral resection (MVR) of involved adjacent organs at the time of radical nephrectomy (RN) remains poorly described and quantified. Using a national database, we aimed to evaluate the association between RN+MVR and 30-day postoperative complications. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing RN for RCC with and without MVR between 2005 and 2020 using the ACS-NSQIP database. The primary outcome was a composite of any of the following 30-day major postoperative complications: mortality, reoperation, cardiac event, and neurologic event. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the composite primary outcome, as well as infectious and venous thromboembolic complications, unplanned intubation and ventilation, transfusion, readmission, and prolonged length of stay (LOS). Groups were balanced using propensity score matching. Likelihood of complications was assessed by conditional logistic regression adjusted for unbalanced total operation time. Postoperative complications were compared by Fisher's exact test among subtypes of resection. A total of 12,417 patients were identified: 12,193 (98.2%) undergoing RN alone and 224 (1.8%) undergoing RN+MVR. Patients undergoing RN+MVR were more likely to experience major complications (odds ratio [OR] 2.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-4.74). However, there was no significant association between RN+MVR and postoperative mortality (OR 2.49; 95% CI 0.89-7.01). RN+MVR was associated with higher rates of reoperation (OR 7.85; 95% CI 2.38-25.8), sepsis (OR 5.45; 95% CI 1.83-16.2), surgical site infection (OR 4.41; 95% CI 2.14-9.07), blood transfusion (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.55-3.22), readmission (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.11-2.84), infectious complications (OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.62-4.24), and longer hospital stay (5 days [IQR 3-8] vs. 4 days [IQR 3-7]; OR 2.31 [95% CI 2.13-3.03]). There was no heterogeneity in the association between subtype of MVR and major complication rate. Undergoing RN+MVR is associated with an increased risk of 30-day postoperative morbidity, including infectious complications, reoperation, blood transfusion, prolonged LOS, and readmission.

Distal Pancreatectomy With En Bloc Celiac Axis Resection (DP-CAR) for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Safe and Effective Procedure.

To determine perioperative and oncologic outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac axis (DP-CAR). DP-CAR can be used in a selective group of patients to resect locally advanced pancreatic cancer involving the celiac axis or common hepatic artery without arterial reconstruction by preserving retrograde blood flow via the gastroduodenal artery to the liver and stomach. We analyzed all consecutive patients who had undergone DP-CAR between May 2003 and April 2022 at a tertiary hospital specialized in pancreatic surgery and present one of the largest single-center studies. A total of 71 patients underwent DP-CAR. Additional venous resection (VR) of the mesenterico-portal axis was performed in 31 patients (44%) and multivisceral resection (MVR) in 42 patients (59%). Margin-free (R0) resection was achieved in 40 patients (56%). The overall 90-day mortality rate was 8.4% for the entire patient cohort. After a cumulated experience of 16 cases, the 90-day mortality dropped to 3.6% in the following 55 patients. Extended procedures with (+) additional MVR with or without (+/-) VR resulted in higher major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIB; standard DP-CAR: 19%; DP-CAR + MVR +/- VR: 36%) and higher 90-day mortality (standard DP-CAR: 0%; DP-CAR + MVR +/- VR: 11%). Median overall survival after DP-CAR was 28 months. DP-CAR is a safe and effective procedure but requires experience. Frequently, surgical resection has to be extended with MVR and VR to accomplish tumor resection, which results in promising oncologic outcomes. However, extended resections were associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

Complex Vascular Resections for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) are locally aggressive tumors that can compromise major vessels of the retroperitoneum including the inferior vena cava, aorta, or main tributary vessels. Vascular involvement can be secondary to the tumor's infiltrating growth pattern or primary vascular origin. Surgery is still the mainstay for curing this disease, and resection of RPSs may include major vascular resections to secure adequate oncologic results. Our improved knowledge in the tumor biology of RPSs, in conjunction with the growing surgical expertise in both sarcoma and vascular surgical techniques, has allowed for major vascular reconstructions within multi-visceral resections for RPSs with good perioperative results. This complex surgical approach may include the combined work of various surgical subspecialties.

Multivisceral resection for primary pancreatic signet ring cell carcinoma.

Primary pancreatic signet ring cell carcinoma (PPSRCC) is a rare and aggressive tumor with poor prognosis. Here, we report a case of PPSRCC treated with curative surgery. A 49-year-old man presented with right mid-abdominal pain. Imaging tests showed a 3.6cm tumor extending around the head of the pancreas, the second portion of the duodenum, and the retroperitoneum. Involvement of the right proximal ureter resulted in moderate right hydronephrosis. A subsequent tumor biopsy revealed suspected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. No apparent lymph node or remote metastases were observed. The tumor was considered resectable, and radical pancreaticoduodenectomy was planned. Pancreaticoduodenectomy, right nephroureterectomy, and right hemicolectomy were conducted to resect the tumor en bloc. Final pathology revealed a poorly differentiated ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with signet ring cells infiltrating the right ureter and transverse mesocolon (pT3N0M0, stage IIA, according to UICC for International Cancer Control TNM classification). The postoperative course was uneventful, and oral fluoropyrimidine (S-1) was administered as adjuvant chemotherapy for 1year. At the 16-month follow-up, the patient was alive without any evidence of recurrence. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with right hemicolectomy and right nephroureterectomy was performed for curative resection of PPSRCC infiltrating the transverse mesocolon and right ureter.

Organ Infiltration and Patient Risk After Multivisceral Surgery for Primary Retroperitoneal Liposarcomas.

The extent of histological organ involvement (HOI) to organs and structures of a retroperitoneal liposarcoma may have prognostic implications. This study investigated incidence, characteristics, and risk association of HOI in these patients. Data of patients who underwent multivisceral resection for primary liposarcoma (2009-2014) were retrospectively analyzed. HOI was the variable of interest and was classified into four degrees: absent (HOI-0), perivisceral (HOI-1), initial (HOI-2), and advanced (HOI-3). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The prognostic value of HOI was adjusted for preoperative treatment and the Sarculator nomogram score. A total of 109 patients were included. HOI-0, HOI-1, HOI-2, and HOI-3 were detected in 9 (8.3%), 11 (10.1%), 43 (39.4%), and 46 (42.2%) patients. Median follow-up was 8.4 years [interquartile range (IQR) 7.2-9.6 years]. There were 68 recurrences and 50 patient deaths observed, resulting in a 10-year OS and DFS of 51.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 41.9-62.1%] and 34.1% (95% CI 25.2-46.1%), respectively. Clinically relevant HOIs (HOI-2 and HOI-3) were found in 35/45 (77.8%) and 54/64 (84.4%) cases of well- and de-differentiated liposarcomas, respectively. On multivariable survival analysis, patients with HOI-3 had significantly shorter OS (HOI-3 vs HOI-0/HOI-1 HR 2.92; p = 0.012) and DFS (HOI-3 vs HOI-0/HOI-1 HR 2.23; p = 0.045), independently of the nomogram score (OS: HR 2.93; p < 0.001; DFS: HR 1.78; p = 0.003). Initial and advanced HOIs are frequently detected in both well-differentiated and de-differentiated liposarcomas, supporting that multivisceral resection may be needed. HOI stratifies the risk of patients with primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

Does Pathological T-Factor Affect Long-term Prognosis of Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated With Laparoscopic Multivisceral Resection?

Locally advanced colorectal cancer (LACC) has poor long-term outcomes. Our hypothesis was that the pathological tumor depth would affect postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent multivisceral resection with clear margins (R0). The aim of this study was to analyze short- and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent multivisceral resection for LACC, comparing between T3 and T4 stages. This was a propensity score-matched, retrospective study. All 8,764 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer between April 2007 and January 2021 at the Saitama Medical University International Medical Center were screened; 572 underwent multivisceral resection for LACC. We compared the T3 and T4 groups to evaluate outcomes. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (hazard ratio=1.344, 95% confidence interval=0.638-2.907, p=0.33). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were significantly worse for the T4 group than for the T3 group (hazard ratio=3.162, 95% confidence interval=1.077-11.44), p=0.037). To determine the association between American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, transfusion, pathological T and OS, we performed univariate and multivariate analyses. ASA, transfusion, and pathological T-stage were associated with worse OS in univariate analysis (T4 vs. T3, respectively). Our study showed that postoperative complications and DFS of the T4 group were similar to those of the T3 group of locally advanced colorectal cancer treated with laparoscopic multivisceral resection. However, OS was worse in the T4 group compared with the T3 group. Multivariate risk factors for poor OS were ASA>2, transfusion, and T4 stage.

Outcomes following open versus laparoscopic multi-visceral resection for locally advanced colorectal cancer: Asystematic review and meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis aims to compare morbidity, mortality, oncological safety, and survival outcomes after laparoscopic multi-visceral resection (MVR) of the locally advanced primary colorectal cancer (CRC) compared with open surgery. A systematic search of multiple electronic data sources was conducted, and all studies comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with locally advanced CRC undergoing MVR were selected. The primary endpoints were peri-operative morbidity and mortality. Secondary endpoints were R0 and R1 resection, local and distant disease recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates. RevMan 5.3 was used for data analysis. Ten comparative observational studies reporting a total of 936 patients undergoing laparoscopic MVR (n = 452) and open surgery (n = 484) were identified. Primary outcome analysis demonstrated a significantly longer operative time in laparoscopic surgery compared with open operations (P = 0.008). However, intra-operative blood loss (P<0.00001) and wound infection (P = 0.05) favoured laparoscopy. Anastomotic leak rate (P = 0.91), intra-abdominal abscess formation (P = 0.40), and mortality rates (P = 0.87) were comparable between the two groups. Moreover the total number of harvested lymph nodes, R0/R1 resections, local/distant disease recurrence, DFS, and OS rates were also comparable between the groups. Although inherent limitations exist with observational studies, the available evidence demonstrates that laparoscopic MVR in locally advanced CRC seems to be a feasible and oncologically safe surgical option in carefully selected cohorts.

Primary extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor of retroperitoneum: Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of six cases.

This study investigates the clinicopathological features and prognostic genic biomarker factors of primary retroperitoneal extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs). The clinicopathological data of six patients with primary retroperitoneal EGIST were analyzed, including cell type (epithelioid or spindle), mitoses, and the presence of intratumoral necrosis and hemorrhage. Mitoses were counted and summed from 50 high power fields (HPFs). Mutations of exons 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 17 of the C-kit genes and those of exons 12 and 18 of the PDGFRA gene were examined. Follow-up was performed via telephone, and all outpatient records were reviewed. The last follow-up date was February 2022, the median follow-up was 27.5m and the postoperative status, medication, and survival of the patients were recorded. The patients were treated with radical intent. Four cases (patients 3, 4, 5, and 6) underwent multivisceral resection for encroachment on the adjacent viscera. The postoperative pathological results demonstrated that all biopsy specimens were negative for S-100 and desmin, and positive for DOG1 and CD117. Additionally, four patients (case 1, 2, 4, and 5) were positive for CD34, four (case 1, 3, 5, and 6) were positive for SMA, four (case 1, 4, 5, and 6) had >5/50 HPFs, and three (case 1, 4, and 5) had Ki67 >5%. According to the modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines, all patients were graded as high-risk cases. By exome sequencing, exon11 mutations were detected in the six patients, while exon10 mutations were detected in two cases (patients 4 and 5). The median follow-up time was 30.5 (11-109) months, with only one fatality at 11 months. Retroperitoneal EGIST is a rare mesenchymal tumor that is difficult to distinguish from other retroperitoneal tumors. To diagnose this highly malignant tumor, low-threshold suspicion is necessary, and Kit and PDGFRA gene mutations should be routinely tested to confirm the diagnosis and guide subsequent treatment.

Downsizing of rectal cancer following neoadjuvant radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy) and long interval surgery evaluated using MRI semiautomated volumetric measurements, a retrospective study.

Neoadjuvant conventional chemoradiation (CRT) is the standard treatment for primary locally non-curatively resectable rectal cancer, as tumor downsizing may allow R0 resectability. Short-term neoadjuvant radiotherapy (5x5 Gy) followed by an interval before surgery (SRT- delay) is an alternative for multimorbid patients who cannot tolerate CRT. This study examined the extent of tumor downsizing achieved with the SRT-delay approach in a limited cohort that underwent complete re-staging before surgery. Between March 2018 and July 2021, 26 patients with locally advanced primary adenocarcinoma (>uT3 or/and N+) of the rectum were treated with SRT-delay. 22 patients underwent initial staging and complete re-staging (CT, endoscopy, MRI). Tumor downsizing was assessed by staging and re-staging data and pathologic findings. Semiautomated measurement of tumor volume was performed using mint Lesion™ 1.8 software to evaluate tumor regression. The mean tumor diameter determined on sagittal T2 MRI images decreased significantly from 54.1 (23-78) mm at initial staging to 37.9 (18-65) mm at re-staging before surgery (p <0.001) and to 25.5 (7-58) mm at pathologic examination (p <0.001). This corresponds to a mean reduction in tumor diameter of 28.9 (4.3-60.7) % at re-staging and 51.1 (8.7-86.5) % at pathology. Mean tumor volume determined from transverse T2 MR images mint LesionTM 1.8 software significantly decreased from 27.5 (9.8 - 89.6) cm3 at initial staging to 13.1 (3.7 - 32.8) cm3 at re-staging (p <0.001), corresponding to a mean reduction of 50.8 (21.6 - 77) %. The frequency of positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) (less than 1mm) decreased from 45,5 % (10 patients) at initial staging to 18,2 % (4 patients) at re-staging. On pathologic examination, the CRM was negative in all cases. However, multivisceral resection for T4 tumors was required in 2 patients (9%). Tumor downstaging was noted in 15 of 22 patients after SRT-delay. In conclusion, the observed extent of downsizing is broadly comparable to the results of CRT, making SRT-delay a serious alternative for patients who cannot tolerate chemotherapy.