Multi-temporal Airborne Laser Scanning Research Articles

Forest fuel treatment detection using multi-temporal airborne lidar data and high-resolution aerial imagery: a case study in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, California

ABSTRACTTreatments to reduce forest fuels are often performed in forests to enhance forest health, regulate stand density, and reduce the risk of wildfires. Although commonly employed, there are concerns that these forest fuel treatments (FTs) may have negative impacts on certain wildlife species. Often FTs are planned across large landscapes, but the actual treatment extents can differ from the planned extents due to operational constraints and protection of resources (e.g. perennial streams, cultural resources, wildlife habitats). Identifying the actual extent of the treated areas is of primary importance to understand the environmental influence of FTs. Light detection and ranging (lidar) is a powerful remote-sensing tool that can provide accurate measurements of forest structures and has great potential for monitoring forest changes. This study used the canopy height model (CHM) and canopy cover (CC) products derived from multi-temporal airborne laser scanning (ALS) data to monitor forest changes following the implementation of landscape-scale FT projects. Our approach involved the combination of a pixel-wise thresholding method and an object-of-interest (OBI) segmentation method. We also investigated forest change using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and standardized principal component analysis from multi-temporal high-resolution aerial imagery. The same FT detection routine was then applied to compare the capability of ALS data and aerial imagery for FT detection. Our results demonstrate that the FT detection using ALS-derived CC products produced both the highest total accuracy (93.5%) and kappa coefficient (κ) (0.70), and was more robust in identifying areas with light FTs. The accuracy using ALS-derived CHM products (the total accuracy was 91.6%, and the κ was 0.59) was significantly lower than that using ALS-derived CC, but was still higher than using aerial imagery. Moreover, we also developed and tested a method to recognize the intensity of FTs directly from pre- and post-treatment ALS point clouds.

The effects of field plot size on model-assisted estimation of aboveground biomass change using multitemporal interferometric SAR and airborne laser scanning data

Remotely sensed data from airborne laser scanning (ALS) and interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) can greatly improve the precision of estimates of forest resource parameters such as mean biomass and biomass change per unit area. Field plots are typically used to construct models that relate the variable of interest to explanatory variables derived from the remotely sensed data. The models may then be used in combination with the field plots to provide estimates for a geographical area of interest with corresponding estimates of precision using model-assisted estimators. Previous studies have shown that field plot sizes found suitable for pure field surveys may be sub-optimal for use in combination with remotely sensed data. Plot boundary effects, co-registration problems, and misalignment problems favor larger plots because the relative impact of these effects on the models of relationships may decline by increasing plot size. In a case study in a small boreal forest area in southeastern Norway (852.6ha) a probability sample of 145 field plots was measured twice over an 11year period (1998/1999 and 2010). For each plot, field measurements were recorded for two plot sizes (200m2 and 300/400m2). Corresponding multitemporal ALS (1999 and 2010) and InSAR data (2000 and 2011) were also available. Biomass for each of the two measurement dates as well as biomass change were modeled for all plot sizes separately using explanatory variables from the ALS and InSAR data, respectively. Biomass change was estimated using model-assisted estimators. Separate estimates were obtained for different methods for estimation of change, like the indirect method (difference between predictions of biomass for each of the two measurement dates) and the direct method (direct prediction of change). Relative efficiency (RE) was calculated by dividing the variance obtained for a pure field-based change estimate by the variance of a corresponding estimate using the model-assisted approach. For ALS, the RE values ranged between 7.5 and 15.0, indicating that approximately 7.5–15.0 as many field plots would be required for a pure field-based estimate to provide the same precision as an ALS-assisted estimate. For InSAR, RE ranged between 1.8 and 2.5. The direct estimation method showed greater REs than the indirect method for both remote sensing technologies. There was clearly a trend of improved RE of the model-assisted estimates by increasing plot size. For ALS and the direct estimation method RE increased from 9.8 for 200m2 plots to 15.0 for 400m2 plots. Similar trends of increasing RE with plot size were observed for InSAR. ALS showed on average 3.2–6.0 times greater RE values than InSAR. Because remote sensing can contribute to improved precision of estimates, sample plot size is a prominent design issue in future sample surveys which should be considered with due attention to the great benefits that can be achieved when using remote sensing if the plot size reflects the specific challenges arising from use of remote sensing in the estimation. That is especially the case in the tropics where field resources may be scarce and inaccessibility and poor infrastructure hamper field work.

Uncertainty assessment of multi-temporal airborne laser scanning data: A case study on an Alpine glacier

In glaciology, volumetric changes from multi-temporal digital elevation models (DEMs) serve to validate and calibrate glacier mass balances from traditional in situ measurements. In this study, we provide a thorough uncertainty assessment of multi-temporal airborne laser scanning DEMs based on: (a) applying a statistical error model, (b) comparing laser echoes to reference points and surfaces, and (c) developing a physical error propagation model. The latter model takes into account the measurement platform characteristics, components of the measurement process, and the surface properties. Such a model allows the estimation of systematic and stochastic uncertainties for single laser echoes, as well as for distributed surfaces in every part of the study site, independent of the reference surfaces. The full error propagation framework is applied to multi-temporal DEMs covering the highly undulating terrain in the Findelengletscher catchment in Canton Valais, Switzerland. This physical error propagation model is able to reproduce stochastic uncertainties in accordance with measurements from reference surfaces. The high laser point density in the study site reduces the stochastic uncertainties over the whole glacier area to negligibly small values. However, systematic uncertainties greatly influence the calculation of mass changes and lead to corrections of the thickness change of up to 35%.

Change detection of mountain birch using multi-temporal ALS point clouds

The use of multi-temporal laser scanner data is potentially an efficient method for monitoring of vegetation changes, for example, at the alpine treeline. Methods for relative calibration of multi-temporal airborne laser scanning (ALS) data sets and detection of experimental changes of tree cover in the forest–tundra ecotone was tested in northern Sweden (68° 20′ N, 19° 01′ E). Trees were either partly or totally removed on 6 m radius sample plots to simulate two classes of biomass change. Histogram matching was successfully used to calibrate the laser metrics from the two data sets and sample plots were then classified into three change classes. The proportion of vegetation returns from the canopy was the most important explanatory variable, which provided an overall accuracy of 88%. The classification accuracy was clearly dependent on the density of the forest.