With the increasing use of living-donor liver grafts in adult patients, small-for-size syndrome became an important clinical problem (1). Its occurrence appears to depend on a number of recipient and graft factors. Potential pathogenic mechanisms include persistent portal hypertension and portal over-perfusion (2). At present, several techniques are being explored in an attempt to ameliorate the impact of small-for-size syndrome (3). A 47-year-old man, 196 cm tall and 78 kg in weight, suffering from end-stage hepatitis B cirrhosis, underwent living-donor liver transplantation (LDLTx) in our center. His own liver had a calculated volume of 1,639 mL as shown by native liver computer tomography (CT) and was replaced by the right hemiliver of his brother, which had a calculated native volume of 935 mL as shown by three-dimensional CT. A graft-recipient weight ratio of 0.8% was measured preoperatively. Intraoperatively, after an uneventful right hepatectomy of the donor according to the virtual intervention planning, the right graft was weighed at 719 g. To reduce the portal vein over-perfusion and to prevent a small-for-size syndrome in the recipient, a “portal vein-wrapping” with Tabotamb (regenerated oxidized cellulose mesh with local hemostatic ability) was performed intraoperatively. On the first postoperative day, the patient underwent a second laparotomy under the suspicion of hepatic artery thrombosis, which was not confirmed. Over the next 3 days, the patient developed liver dysfunction (elevation of total bilirubin from 4.4 to 31.2 mg/dL, increased prothrombin time [PT]) and increasing encephalopathy, although the other enzymes (ASAT, ALAT, LDH) showed a regular clinical course. A decision to implement plasmapheresis was made. The procedure was well tolerated by the patient, who remained hemodynamically stable throughout the treatment period. Serum levels of total bilirubin and PT as well as encephalopathy were significantly improved after the first session of plasmapheresis. Because of significant clinical improvement after the first session, plasmapheresis was not repeated. The patient left the intensive care unit on postoperative day 12. Liver volume was calculated as 2,137 mL on postoperative day 15. Bilirubin, ASAT, ALT, and coagulation profile returned to a normal range, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 29 in good physical condition. Twelve months after transplantation, he returned to his everyday activities and is currently in good general condition. Severe hyperbilirubinemia is known to exert multiple toxic effects. Artificial liver-support devices attempt to bridge patients with fulminant hepatic failure until either a suitable liver allograft is obtained for transplantation or the patient’s own liver regenerates sufficiently to resume normal function (4). No great experience with liver-transplant patients is available as yet (5). The role of repeated sessions of plasmapheresis for primary allograft nonfunction after liver transplantation has been reported (6). As our case indicates, even a single plasmapheresis can be an effective treatment for small-for-size syndrome after LDLTx when combined with a surgical modulation of the portal vein inflow such as “portal vein wrapping.” Fuat Saner Georgios C. Sotiropoulos Arnold Radtke Massimo Malagó Christoph E. Broelsch Department of General Surgery and Transplantation University Hospital Essen Essen, Germany Stefan Herget-Rosenthal Department of Nephrology University Hospital Essen Essen, Germany
Read full abstract