Multiplate Research Articles

Relation between clopidogrel active metabolite levels and different platelet aggregation methods in patients receiving clopidogrel and aspirin

Clopidogrel is a prodrug that undergoes bioconversion via cytochrome P450 system to form an active metabolite (AM) that binds to the platelet ADP receptor. The antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel is commonly assessed by measuring the aggregatory response to 5μM ADP by light transmission aggregation (LTA) or multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) or by the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein platelet reactivity index (VASP-PRI). To determine which of these three tests of platelet ADP receptor pathway inhibition most closely correlates with clopidogrel AM levels. We analyzed blood samples from 82 patients with coronary artery disease who were randomized to receive double-dose or standard dose clopidogrel for 2weeks. We measured peak clopidogrel AM levels, platelet aggregation in response to ADP and VASP-PRI on days 1, and repeated all the measures on days 7 and 14. Linear regression analysis was used to examine the correlation between clopidogrel AM and LTA, MEA and VASP-PRI. Bland-Altman plots were used to explore the agreement between tests of the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel. Clopidogrel AM on day 1 correlated most closely with VASP-PRI (r=-0.5767) and demonstrated weaker correlations with LTA (r=-0.4656) and MEA (r=-0.3384) (all p<0.01). Intra-class correlation (ICC) between VASP-PRI and LTA was 0.6446; VASP-PRI and MEA was 0.4720; and LTA and MEA was 0.4693. Similar results were obtained on days 7 and 14. Commonly used pharmacodynamic measures of clopidogrel response are only moderately correlated with clopidogrel AM levels and may not be suitable to measure the adequacy of clopidogrel therapy.

Sequential ADP-stimulated light transmission and multiple electrode aggregometry in patients taking aspirin and clopidogrel after non ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Background. Fast platelet function tests can identify weak clopidogrel responders, but data on variability over time in clopidogrel responsiveness in several clinical settings are lacking. We wanted to explore long-term variability of multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) measurements and the agreement between MEA and light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) treated with aspirin and clopidogrel. Methods. Parallel MEA and LTA were performed at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks in 31 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention after NSTEMI. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) concentrations 2 μM, 6.5 μM and 10 μM were used. Parallel testings in both arterial and venous blood were performed at baseline. MEA and LTA cut-off levels were applied to discriminate aggregation values suggesting presence or absence of high platelet reactivity (HPR). Results. Arterial and venous MEA and LTA aggregation were similar. Within-subject variability in both MEA and LTA aggregation throughout the study was moderate. According to MEA, eight patients had HPR at baseline (MEA aggregation > 47 U). Defining > 47% as the LTA aggregation HPR cut-off level, the same number of patients (eight) had HPR according to LTA. Of the 93 MEA/LTA observations 81 (87.1%) gave the same HPR classification. MEA vs. LTA agreement at baseline was slightly inferior to that obtained after 12 weeks. Conclusions. MEA and LTA aggregation in arterial and venous blood seem similar. Within-subject variability over time was moderate, and the agreement between LTA and MEA was good, and stable in most patients.

Do blood collection methods influence whole-blood platelet function analysis?

Pre-analytical variables interact with standard coagulation parameters. How these variables affect the platelet function analysis is not completely known. How collection site and puncture method affect multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) and platelet function analyzer (PFA-100®) was compared regarding contact activation. First, volunteers scheduled for elective cardiac surgery had blood collected from four lines: venous, arterial, central venous and by venipuncture. MEA and PFA-100® were analysed blinded for site origin. Second, two samples (citrate, Corn Trypsin Inhibitor, CTI) were collected in syringe or vacuum tubes. Thrombin generation (TG) was determined. MEA was triggered by adenosine diphosphate (ADP, 6.4 µM), arachidonic acid (ASPI, 0.5 mM), collagen (Col, 3.2 µg/ml), ristocetin (Risto, 0.2 mg/ml) and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP, 32 µM). PFA-100® was triggered by collagen/epinephrine and collagen/ADP. TG was assessed in platelet-poor plasma with 1 pM tissue factor and 4 µM phospholipids and without trigger. Data were analysed using a two-way mixed-effects model for the intraclass correlation (ICC) and by the Mann–Whitney U-test. MEA and PFA-100® revealed good correlation (ICC) between the sites. CTI inhibited TG significantly more effective than citrate. Contact activation was independent of the collection method. Only the MEA ASPI test revealed significant differences between the two collection methods. Blood sampling from all lines for MEA and PFA-100® assays is justified. Contact activation is always present. Apparently this does not influence platelet function test results. Collection methods do not seem relevant, although, one should always consider using a standardized method.

Personalized antiplatelet treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention: The MADONNA study

Background and objectivesClopidogrel non-responsiveness is associated with adverse clinical outcome. We aimed to investigate whether individualized antiplatelet treatment in clopidogrel non-responders is an effective and safe strategy. MethodsThis was a prospective non-randomized non-blinded study comparing two cohorts (guided and non-guided treatment) with a follow-up of 1-month. Responsiveness to clopidogrel was assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in 798 patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the guided group (n=403) clopidogrel non-responders received repeated loading doses of clopidogrel or prasugrel, in the non-guided group (n=395) clopidogrel non-responders did not undergo any change in treatment. ResultsStent thrombosis occurred significantly less often in the guided group than in the non-guided group (0.2% vs. 1.9%; p=0.027). The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that patients in the non-guided group were at a 7.9-fold higher risk to develop stent thrombosis compared to the guided group (OR: 7.9; 95% CI: 1.08–69.2; p=0.048). In line with this, acute coronary syndrome occurred significantly less often in the guided group than in the non-guided group (0% vs. 2.5%; p=0.001) whereas there was no difference in the event rates of cardiac death (2% vs. 1.3%; p=0.422) or major bleedings (1% vs. 0.3%; p=0.186). ConclusionPersonalized antiplatelet treatment according to the platelet function testing with MEA resulted in an improved efficacy with an equal safety compared to the standard treatment.

Evaluation of the role of the new INNOVANCE PFA P2Y test cartridge in detection of clopidogrel resistance

Light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) has been extensively used in monitoring clopidogrel therapy. However, the availability of simple and rapid point-of-care platelet function assays is of great clinical importance. Thus, the manufacturer of the Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA)-100 System has recently produced the INNOVANCE PFA P2Y test cartridge. We assessed the ability of this new test to reliably detect clopidogrel resistance. We enrolled 90 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease receiving chronic clopidogrel maintenance therapy in combination with aspirin. Twenty healthy volunteers served as controls. Clopidogrel resistance was simultaneously analysed by the INNOVANCE PFA P2Y test cartridge, ADP-induced LTA, the flow-cytometric vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP)-phosphorylation assay and the multiple electrode aggregometry (Multiplate). Agreement among the four platelet function methods by two was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient. According to the cut-off points for clopidogrel resistance proposed by the literature, agreement was fair between INNOVANCE PFA-100 P2Y and LTA (74.4%) and Multiplate (75.6%), while poor agreement was noticed in VASP assay (63.3%). Based on cut-off points indicating a higher thrombotic risk, agreement between the PFA-100 System and the other three methods did not significantly differ compared to the previous cut-offs (72.2%, 71.1% and 55.1%, respectively). The INNOVANCE PFA-100 P2Y test seems to be comparable to other established platelet function assays in detecting clopidogrel resistance. However, the modest agreement among platelet function methods makes the performance of platelet function testing crucial with more than one technique in order to reliably identify poor responders to clopidogrel treatment.

Clopidogrel Response Up to Six Months After Acute Myocardial Infarction

High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) despite clopidogrel therapy is associated with adverse cardiac events after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Most studies to date have assessed clopidogrel response at a single time point before or after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is unclear, however, whether the HTPR phenotype is stable over time. Therefore, we aimed to examine response to clopidogrel in patients with AMI treated with PCI over a 6-month period. Patients (n = 57) with AMI treated with PCI were assessed for response to clopidogrel at 3 time points: in hospital, 30 days, and 6 months after index hospitalization. Response to clopidogrel was determined by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (reported as P2Y12 response units) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA; reported as aggregation units). HTPR was defined as ≥235 P2Y12 response units or ≥47 aggregation units. Patients' mean age was 54.5 ± 10.9 years, 91% were men, 19% had diabetes, and 74% were admitted with ST-segment elevation MI. HTPR based on MEA was observed in 22.8% of patients in hospital, 26.3% at 30 days, and 17.5% at 6 months (p = NS). HTPR based on the VerifyNow assay was observed in 38.6% of patients in hospital, 28.1% at 30 days, and 33.3% at 6 months (p = NS). Individual HTPR phenotypic assignment at baseline was stable in 73.7% (based on MEA) and 70.2% (based on VerifyNow) of patients at 6-month follow-up. In conclusion, this is the first study evaluating the stability of clopidogrel response over time after AMI. Rates of HTPR to clopidogrel therapy appear to be relatively stable up to 6 months after AMI.

Phenotyping vs. genotyping for prediction of clopidogrel efficacy and safety: the PEGASUS‐PCI study

Prognostic values of genotyping and phenotyping for assessment of clopidogrel responsiveness have been shown in independent studies. To compare different assays for prediction of events during long-term follow-up. In this prospective cohort study polymorphisms of CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*17 alleles, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP) assay, multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), cone and platelet analyser (CPA) and platelet function analyser (PFA-100) were performed in 416 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The rates of events were recorded during a 12-month follow-up. Platelet aggregation by MEA predicted stent thrombosis (2.4%) better (c-index = 0.90; P < 0.001; sensitivity = 90%; specificity = 83%) than the VASP assay, CPA or PFA-100 (c-index < 0.70; P > 0.05; sensitivity < 70%; specificity < 70% for all) or even the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism (c-index < 0.56; P > 0.05; sensitivity = 30%; specificity = 71%). Survival analysis indicated that patients classified as poor responders by MEA had a substantially higher risk of developing stent thrombosis or MACE than clopidogrel responders (12.5% vs. 0.3%, P < 0.001, and 18.5% vs. 11.3%, P = 0.022, respectively), whereas poor metabolizers (CYP2C19*1/*2 or *2/*2 carriers) were not at increased risks (stent thrombosis, 2.7% vs. 2.5%, P > 0.05; MACE, 13.5% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.556). The incidence of major bleedings (2.6%) was numerically higher in patients with an enhanced vs. poor response to clopidogrel assessed by MEA (4% vs. 0%) or in ultra-metabolizers vs. regular metabolizers (CYP2C19*17/*17 vs. CYP2C19*1/*1; 9.5% vs. 2%). The classification tree analysis demonstrated that acute coronary syndrome at hospitalization and diabetes mellitus were the best discriminators for clopidogrel responder status. Phenotyping of platelet response to clopidogrel was a better predictor of stent thrombosis than genotyping.

Platelet Function in Stored Heparinised Autologous Blood Is Not Superior to in Patient Platelet Function during Routine Cardiopulmonary Bypass

BackgroundIn cardiac surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and unfractionated heparin have negative effects on blood platelet function. In acute normovolemic haemodilution autologous unfractionated heparinised blood is stored ex-vivo and retransfused at the end of the procedure to reduce (allogeneic) transfusion requirements. In this observational study we assessed whether platelet function is better preserved in ex vivo stored autologous blood compared to platelet function in the patient during CPB.Methodology/Principal FindingWe measured platelet aggregation responses pre-CPB, 5 min after the start of CPB, at the end of CPB, and after unfractionated heparin reversal, using multiple electrode aggregometry (Multiplate®) with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) and ristocetin activated test cells. We compared blood samples taken from the patient with samples taken from 100 ml ex-vivo stored blood, which we took to mimick blood storage during normovolemic haemodilution. Platelet function declined both in ex-vivo stored blood as well as in blood taken from the patient. At the end of CPB there were no differences in platelet aggregation responses between samples from the ex vivo stored blood and the patient.Conclusion/SignificanceEx vivo preservation of autologous blood in unfractionated heparin does not seem to be profitable to preserve platelet function.

Description of Response to Aspirin and Clopidogrel in Outpatients With Coronary Artery Disease Using Multiple Electrode Impedance Aggregometry

Identification of outpatients with high platelet reactivity (HPR) on antiplatelet treatment is an unmet need. The present study was conducted in healthy individuals (n = 50) and in outpatients with coronary artery disease (CAD) at a distance from the acute ischemic episode (aspirin group, n = 71; aspirin/clopidogrel group, n = 106). We studied the feasibility and the precision of whole blood multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) after triggering platelet aggregation by arachidonic acid or adenosine diphospate (ADP). The MEA can be performed on whole blood within 2 hours after sample venipuncture. The threshold for the diagnosis of HPR is situated at 55 and 50 U for the arachidonic acid and ADP test, respectively. Frequency of HPR was 7% and 20% in aspirin and aspirin/clopidogrel groups, respectively. In 3.8% of patients in aspirin/clopidogrel group, combined HPR on aspirin and clopidogrel was found. In outpatients with CAD, use of MEA is feasible for the diagnosis of HPR.

Dual non-responsiveness to antiplatelet treatment is a stronger predictor of cardiac adverse events than isolated non-responsiveness to clopidogrel or aspirin

BackgroundHigh platelet reactivity (HPR) under treatment with clopidogrel or aspirin is associated with adverse outcome. We aimed to investigate whether high platelet reactivity (HPR) to both aspirin and clopidogrel is a stronger predictor of adverse events compared to isolated HPR to clopidogrel or aspirin. MethodsIn this prospective cohort study platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid (AA) was assessed by Multiple Electrode Aggregometry (MEA) in 403 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The rates of the composite of cardiac adverse events (acute coronary syndrome, stent thrombosis, stroke, death and revascularization) were recorded during 12-month follow-up. ResultsThe composite endpoint of cardiovascular adverse events occurred more often in patients with high platelet reactivity (HPR) to both agonists ADP and AA (37.5%) than in those with isolated HPR to ADP (33.3%), AA (25.6%) or without any HPR (18.6%; p=0.003). Classification tree analysis indicated that any HPR emerged as an independent predictor influencing outcome, which was associated with a 1.75 higher risk of cardiac adverse events (OR=1.75: 95%CI=1.1–2.9). Interestingly, the predictive value of HPR tended to be greater among patients with diabetes mellitus (OR=2.18; 95%CI=1.20–3.95). C-reactive protein and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of high platelet reactivity to both agonists. ConclusionsDual low responsiveness to clopidogrel and aspirin is a strong predictor of cardiac adverse events, especially in patients with diabetes mellitus, which underlines the need for personalized antiplatelet treatment.

ARC15105 Is a Potent Antagonist of Von Willebrand Factor Mediated Platelet Activation and Adhesion

We investigated the stability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profile of the 2(nd) generation anti-von Willeband factor aptamer ARC15105. Platelet plug formation was measured by collagen/adenosine diphosphate-induced closure time with the platelet function analyzer-100 and platelet aggregation by multiple electrode aggregometry. Platelet adhesion was measured on denuded porcine aortas and in a flow chamber. Aptamer stability was assessed by incubation in nuclease rich human, monkey, and rat serum for up to 72 hours. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles were tested in cynomolgus monkeys after IV and SC administration. The median IC(100) and IC(50) to prolong collagen/adenosine diphosphate-induced closure timewere 27 nmol/L and 12 nmol/L, respectively. ARC15105 (1.3 μmol/L) completely inhibited ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation in whole blood (P<0.001), but also diminished collagen, ADP, arachidonic acid, and thrombin receptor activating peptide-induced platelet aggregation to some extent (P<0.05). ARC15105 (40 nmol/L) decreased platelet adhesion by >90% on denuded porcine aortas (P<0.001), which was comparable to the degree of inhibition obtained with abciximab. ARC15105 (100 nmol/L) also inhibited platelet adhesion to collagen under arterial shear in a flow chamber by >90% (P<0.001). The IV and SC terminal half-lives in cynomolgus monkeys were 67 and 65 hours, respectively, and the SC bioavailability was ≈98%. Allometric scaling estimates the human T(1/2) would be ≈217 hours. Pharmacodynamic analysis confirms that ARC15105 inhibits von Willeband factor activity >90% in blood samples taken 300 hours after a 20 mg/kg IV or SC dose in monkeys. The potency, pharmacokinetic profile, and SC bioavailability of ARC15105 support its clinical investigation for chronic inhibition of von Willeband factor -mediated platelet activation.

Evaluation of multiple electrode aggregometry in whole blood using Multiplate® Mini Test cells

Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) enables rapid platelet function testing in whole blood using 600 μL disposable standard test cells (STC). However, newly available 350μL mini test cells (MTC) could potentially be advantageous in some clinical settings where sample volume is limiting. In order to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MTC, we have estimated assay imprecision, correlation and agreement between area under curve (AUC) determined using MTC and STC in whole blood from healthy donors and from 119 cardiac surgery patients. Imprecision was similar with ADP, AA and TRAP test reagents using STC and MTC, but was markedly higher with the unvalidated ADR reagent. AUC determined using MTC and STC and the ADP, AA and TRAP reagents correlated strongly although MTC yield consistently lower AUC values reflecting fewer platelets in the smaller test cell. Agreement between AUC from STC and MTC was less strong, probably reflecting a composite effect of imprecision from both assay formats. MTC and STC are equally valid for MEA but AUC values obtained using one test format cannot be directly transformed to the other. Therefore, STC and MTC cannot be used interchangeably and AUC results must be compared to separately determined reference intervals.

Tailoring clopidogrel dose according to multiple electrode aggregometry decreases the rate of ischemic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention

Multiple studies have shown a correlation between high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and ischemic complications after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI); however, the role of platelet reactivity testing in order to adjust clopidogrel dose is debated. We sought to determine whether a strategy incorporating platelet reactivity testing with the Multiplate analyzer to tailor the dose of clopidogrel is superior to standard clopidogrel treatment after PCI. Between May 2008 and June 2009, 192 consecutive patients undergoing PCI were randomized to a tailored treatment strategy using the Multiplate analyzer or to uniform administration of 75 mg clopidogrel. In the tailored group, platelet function was assessed 24 h after clopidogrel loading, and patients with HPR (>46 U) received an additional 600 mg loading dose and 150 mg clopidogrel thereafter for one month. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or definite/probable stent thrombosis during six months. In the tailored group, a repeated loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel significantly decreased platelet reactivity in patients with HPR (61.0 U [IQR: 52.5-71.5] vs. 21.5 U [15.8-30.5]; P < 0.0001) that remained unchanged during the maintenance phase on 150 mg clopidogrel (25.0 U [IQR: 19.8-27.0]; P = 0.20). The incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly higher in the standard clopidogrel group as compared to the Multiplate-tailored arm (5.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.03). In parallel, MACCE-free survival significantly improved in patients with Multiplate-tailored therapy (Kaplan-Meier log-rank: P = 0.02). Increasing the dose of clopidogrel according to the Multiplate assay may reduce ischemic complications in patients on clopidogrel after PCI.

Frequency of heparin/platelet factor 4-dependent platelet antibodies in patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting for cardiovascular disease and their role for on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity

The frequency of heparin-induced platelet antibodies (H/PF4 antibodies) following heparin exposure during percutaneous intervention with stent implantation is unknown. These antibodies may activate platelets and therefore contribute to high on-clopidogrel residual platelet reactivity (HRPR). We screened 288 patients after angioplasty and stenting for H/PF4 antibodies by an IgG/A/M ELISA. The 44 (15.3%) positive samples were further evaluated for IgG only antibodies, by the particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA), the heparin induced platelet activation assay (HIPA) and MEA. Further, we determined on-treatment platelet reactivity by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in these patients. In vivo platelet activation was assessed by P-selectin expression. The prevalence of H/PF4 antibodies in the total patients' cohort was 15.3% (95% CI 11.3-20%) by the IgG/A/M ELISA, 9.4% (95% CI 6.3-13.4%) by the IgG ELISA, 11.5% (95% CI 8-15.7%) by PaGIA, 14.2% (95% CI 10.4-18.8%) by MEA, and 2.4% (95% CI 1-4.9%) by HIPA. On-treatment platelet reactivity was similar between patients without and with H/PF4 antibodies [39 AU (6-110 AU) vs. 41 AU (7-91 AU); P = 0.85]. HRPR was seen in 105 patients (37.5%), and occurred to a similar extent in patients without and with H/PF4 antibodies in all test systems (all P > 0.2). Further, there was no difference of the ELISA optical densities using the IgG/A/M or the IgG only ELISA between patients without or with HRPR (all P > 0.3). There was no significant difference of P-selectin expression between patients without or with H/PF4 antibodies (P = 0.97). Noteworthy, none of the patients who developed H/PF4 antibodies had heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or a thromboembolic event. H/PF4 antibodies are not rare in patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting. However, these antibodies are not associated with the occurrence of HRPR.

Increased platelet aggregation and serum thromboxane levels in aspirin-treated patients with prior myocardial infarction

The antiplatelet effect of aspirin displays considerable inter-individual variability. We investigated the antiplatelet effect of aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease on aspirin mono-therapy with and without prior myocardial infarction (MI). Further, we investigated whether the effect of aspirin differed between patients with and without aspirin use at the time of MI onset. We performed a study on 231 patients, including 171 with prior MI. Among patients with only one prior MI (116 patients), 59 patients were on aspirin at the time of MI onset. All patients received 75 mg aspirin as mono-therapy. Platelet aggregation was assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry (Multiplate) and VerifyNow, and platelet activation was evaluated by soluble P-selectin. Furthermore, we measured serum thromboxane B2. MI patients had higher median platelet aggregation levels than patients without prior MI when evaluated by Multiplate (parachidonic acid<0.0001, pcollagen=0.20). This was not supported by VerifyNow. Furthermore, MI patients had higher median serum thromboxane B₂ levels than patients without prior MI (p=0.01). Patients on aspirin before MI onset had significantly higher median aggregation levels compared with MI patients not on aspirin when evaluated by Multiplate (pcollagen=0.02) and VerifyNow (p<0.0001). In conclusion, patients with prior MI had higher platelet aggregation levels than patients without prior MI when evaluated by Multiplate, despite same aspirin dose and optimal compliance. Serum thromboxane B2 levels were higher in MI patients than in patients without prior MI. Finally, patients on aspirin before MI onset had higher aggregation levels compared with patients not on aspirin.

Assessment of platelet function by whole blood impedance aggregometry in coronary artery bypass grafting patients on acetylsalicylic acid treatment may prompt a switch to dual antiplatelet therapy

Residual platelet reactivity (RPR) following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) might be related to thrombotic complications and major ischemic cardiac events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in platelet reactivity monitored pre- and postoperatively using multiple-electrode aggregometry (MEA) and to propose an alternative therapeutic approach in a subgroup of patients with postoperative RPR. Ninety-nine patients undergoing elective CABG were enrolled in the study, of whom 41 (41.4%) were diabetic. Preoperatively, all patients received 100 mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), with 47 of 99 (47.4%) patients receiving an additional 75 mg clopidogrel (CLO). The blood samples were drawn the day before surgery, and on the first and 4th postoperative day. Platelet count and fibrinogen level were documented, as well as type and daily dose of antiplatelet therapy (APT) received pre- and postoperatively. Multiple-electrode aggregometry using tests based on arachidonic acid (ASPI test) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP test) was performed on the day before and 4 days after surgery. Preoperatively, we detected 31 of 99 (31.3%) patients with RPR (ASPI > 30 AUC). Platelet count correlated with both the ASPI (P = 0.03) and ADP (0.002) tests. Fibrinogen correlated with ADP test values (P < 0.001) and was found to have a higher level in the diabetic subgroup (P = 0.01). In comparison with preoperative results, we detected higher values of ASPI test postoperatively (P = 0.04), with 46 of 99 (46.5%) patients having RPR despite a higher dose of 300 mg ASA being administered. Postoperatively, diabetic patients had higher ASPI test values (P = 0.01), and a higher proportion of patients with RPR compared with the nondiabetic subgroup (58.5 vs 38%, P = 0.04). The subgroup of patients with detected ASPI >30 AUC at the 4th postoperative day consequently received as a part of our clinical routine an additional 75 mg CLO per day, in terms of platelet inhibition optimization. Multiple-electrode aggregometry can recognize patients with RPR during both the pre- and post-CABG period. Postoperatively administered ASA (300 mg) did not sufficiently inhibit platelet aggregation in 46.5% of post-CABG patients. In this group of patients a switch to dual APT should be considered.

Influence of cytochrome 2C19 allelic variants on on-treatment platelet reactivity evaluated by five different platelet function tests

BackgroundThe antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel has been linked to cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) carrier status. The presence of loss of function and gain of function variants were found to have a gene-dose effect on clopidogrel metabolism. However, genotyping is only one aspect of predicting response to clopidogrel and several platelet function tests are available to measure platelet response.Patients and methodsWe studied the influence of CYP2C19 allelic variants on on-treatment platelet reactivity as assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, the VASP assay, multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), and the Impact-R in 288 patients after stenting for cardiovascular disease. Allelic variants of CYP2C19 were determined with the Infiniti® CYP450 2C19+ assay and categorized into four metabolizer states (ultrarapid, extensive, intermediate, poor). ResultsPlatelet reactivity increased linearly from ultrarapid to poor metabolizers using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (P =0.04), the VASP assay (P=0.02) and the Impact-R (P=0.04). The proportion of patients with high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) identified by LTA, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and the VASP assay increased when the metabolizer status decreased, while no such relationship could be identified for results of MEA and Impact-R. The presence of loss of function variants (*2/*2, *2-8*/wt, *2/*17) was an independent predictor of HRPR in LTA and the VASP assay while it did not reach statistical significance in the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, MEA, and the Impact-R. ConclusionDepending on the type of platelet function test differences in the association of on-treatment platelet reactivity with CYP2C19 carrier status are observed.

In Vivo Platelet Activation and Its In Vitro Inhibition by Prasugrel's Active Metabolite In Adolescents with Sickle Cell Disease

Abstract 2141 Introduction:In patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), erythrocytes contribute to microvessel occlusion resulting in tissue damage and platelet activation. Platelet activation, aggregation, local thrombus formation and platelet activation-dependent leukocyte recruitment potentially amplify tissue ischemia. Antiplatelet therapy may therefore be useful in SCD. Here we evaluate levels of platelet activation markers in adolescents with SCD vs. normal controls and the effect of in vitro blockade of the platelet ADP receptor P2Y12 by prasugrel's active metabolite, R-138727. Methods:Blood was obtained from adolescents (10 – 18 yr) with SCD and healthy adult subjects. Platelet function was evaluated by: light transmission aggregation (LTA) in platelet-rich plasma with 20 μM ADP and in whole blood by VerifyNow P2Y12; Multiple Electrode Aggregometry (MEA) with 6.5 μM ADP; vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) P2Y12 assay; and whole blood flow cytometric analysis of basal and in vitro ADP-stimulated levels of platelet surface activated GPIIb-IIIa (reported by monoclonal antibody PAC1) and P-selectin, platelet-monocyte aggregates (PMA) and platelet-neutrophil aggregates (PNA). These endpoints were also evaluated after in vitro incubation of whole blood with R-138727 (0.1 – 10 μM). Results:In SCD patients compared with normal subjects, circulating PMA and PNA levels were significantly higher (76.5 ± 20.3% and 55.1 ± 21.8% vs. 20.1 ± 7% and 13.9 ± 4.2% [mean ± SD], respectively, p<0.0001 for both), and in vitro ADP-stimulated platelet surface activated GPIIb-IIIa and P-selectin levels (mean fluorescence, MFI) were significantly lower (128.7 ± 66.2 and 78.1 ± 11.5 vs. 257.3 ± 50.8 and 91.6 ± 5.8, p<0.05 for both). ADP-stimulated platelet aggregation by LTA, VerifyNow and MEA, did not significantly differ between SCD and normal subjects, although whole blood platelet aggregation by MEA and VerifyNow tended to be greater in blood from SCD patients (92.5 vs. 70.4 AU, p=0.064 and 362.9 vs. 314.8 PRU, p=0.488, respectively).Treatment of whole blood in vitro with R-138727 resulted in a concentration-dependent inhibition of platelet function in both SCD patients and normal subjects. However, compared with normal subjects, the IC50 in SCD subjects was significantly lower for LTA but significantly higher for VerifyNow and VASP (Table). R-138727 inhibition of platelet function in SCD patients was similar to normal subjects as judged by MEA, whole blood flow cytometry for ADP-stimulated platelet surface P-selectin and activated GPIIb-IIIa expression, and % PMAs (Table). Sensitivity to R-138727 inhibition in SCD patient blood was greatest as measured by ADP-stimulated platelet surface P-selectin MFI, LTA, and MEA, less with ADP-stimulated platelet surface activated GPIIb-IIIa, and least with VASP, VerifyNow P2Y12 and % P-selectin-positive platelets (Table). Conclusions:1) The markedly higher circulating PMA and PNA levels in SCD patients relative to normal donors demonstrates increased in vivo platelet activation in SCD patients and suggests that PMA and PNA may be useful markers of the in vivo pharmacodynamic effects of antiplatelet therapy in SCD patients. 2) Blockade of platelet P2Y12 with R-138727 produces dose-dependent inhibition of platelet function in SCD platelets. 3) Assay-dependent differences in IC50 values between SCD patients and normal donors suggest the presence of additional variables that affect these measures of platelet function. Further studies are needed to determine the relationship between platelet inhibition measured by these assays and clinical events in SCD patients.TableComparison of R-138727 inhibition of platelet function in blood from SCD adolescents vs. healthy subjects.AssayNormal Donor, n=5 IC50 (95% CI)SCD Patient, n=10 IC50 (95% CI)PLTA, ADP 20 μM2.36 (1.90–2.93)1.59 (1.23–2.05)0.0267VASP P2Y122.14 (1.52–3.02)4.56 (3.90–5.32)0.0013VerifyNow P2Y12, % Inhibition2.09 (1.70–2.56)3.76 (3.28–4.32)<0.0001MEA, 6.5 μM ADP2.43 (1.69–3.49)1.90 (1.50–2.40)0.2479P-selectin, MFI, ADP 20 μM1.08 (0.95–1.24)1.40 (1.15–1.70)0.0503P-selectin, % positive, ADP 20 μM4.25 (3.42–5.27)3.62 (3.15–4.16)0.1891PAC1 MFI, ADP 20 μM2.50 (2.05–3.06)2.45 (2.19–2.73)0.8146% PMAs, ADP 20 μMa2.48a (2.06–3.00)3.30a (1.01–10.8)0.7389Results shown are μM R-138727.aIC50 calculated after subtracting unstimulated values. Disclosures:Frelinger:GLSynthesis: Research Funding; Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Jakubowski:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Heeney:Lilly: Consultancy. Michelson:GLSynthesis: Research Funding; Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo: Data Monitoring Committee for clinical trial, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding.

Effects of Strong P2Y12 Receptor Inhibition by Prasugrel on Platelet Inhibition During Endotoxemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract 1245 Background:P2Y12 receptor antagonists have become a mainstay for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Yet, they have rarely been evaluated under pathophysiological conditions apart from arterial diseases. Objectives:We hypothesized interactions between prasugrel and enhanced von Willebrand Factor (VWF) release in a model of systemic inflammation, and compared the pharmacodynamic effects of prasugrel versus placebo on agonist-induced platelet aggregation and shear-induced platelet plug formation.Subjects/Methods: Twenty healthy male volunteers were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled two-way cross-over trial. Each volunteer received either placebo or a 60 mg-loading dose of prasugrel two hours before endotoxin infusion. Platelet inhibition was measured with Multiple Electrode Aggregometry (MEA), the Platelet Function Analyzer-100 (PFA-100) and the Vasodilator Stimulated Phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay, respectively. Results: Prasugrel reduced the platelet reactivity index in the VASP assay from 79% to 5–7%, and unequivocally prolonged the closure times of the Innovance cartridge to >300s, but also the CADP-CT to >300s in the majority of subjects. Prasugrel not only blunted platelet aggregation induced by ADP (−81%), but also other pathways including arachidonic acid (−60%), ristocetin (−75%; p<0.001 for all), and to a lesser degree collagen or thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP). Prasugrel decreased shear-induced platelet plug formation but VWF release during endotoxemia partly antagonized the inhibitory effect of prasugrel as measured with the PFA-100. Endotoxemia acutely decreased ristocetin and TRAP induced platelet aggregation, and enhanced ristocetin induced aggregation after 24h. Conclusions:These data for the first time demonstrate that strong in vivo blockade of P2Y12 by prasugrel inhibits a broad spectrum of platelet aggregation pathways. However, VWF release may reduce prasugrel's effects under high shear conditions. Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Whole Blood Impedance Aggregometry: A New Tool for Severe Inherited Platelet Disorder Diagnosis?

Abstract 5266Diagnosis and characterization of platelet function disorders may be challenging. It requires multiple laboratory data including the assessment of platelet functions. Platelet function analysis is most commonly performed using light transmission aggregometry (LTA). LTA is a time-consuming method requiring centrifugation steps and large blood volumes. It is difficult to perform in children and in cases of thrombocytopenia. In contrast, platelet aggregation in whole blood using impedancemetry (WBI) is a fast method, allows omission of centrifugation steps and performance of platelet function studies under more physiological conditions with small samples size. It is based on the change of resistance proportional to the amount of platelets sticking to two electrodes where an alternating current is applied. Multiplate® (for “multiple electrode aggregometry”, Dynabite Medical) is a new generation of WBI aggregometer using diluted blood and single-use test cells containing twin electrodes that reduce the variation of results. We have already showed the good Multiplate® performance concerning ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation in a population of 30 patients with characterized von Willebrand disease (Valarche et al, 2011). Our aim in this ongoing study was to assess the performance of WBI in patients with inherited platelet function disorders. We tested 8 patients including 2 unrelated patients with Glanzmann Thrombasthenia (GT), 2 unrelated patients with Bernard-Soulier Syndrome (BSS), 1 patient with Gray Platelet Syndrome (GPS) and 3 patients from the same family with a platelet type von Willebrand disease (PTVWD). GT, BSS, and PTVWD diagnosis were confirmed using genotyping. BSS and GPS patients had chronic thrombocytopenia. GT, BSS, GPS and 1/3 PTVWD had platelet function tests with LTA in parallel. WBI was performed on heparinized whole blood diluted at ½ in NaCl at 37°C and triggered using high (0.77 mg/mL, WBI RH) and low (0.5 mg/mL, WBI RL) final ristocetin concentrations, ADP (6.5 Âμ Mol, WBI ADP) and collagen (3.2 Âμg/mL, WBI Coll). Results were expressed in arbitrary unit (AU) corresponding to the area under the aggregation curve observed during 6 min. Normal ranges indicated in brackets were based on the mean +/− 2 SD of 30 healthy volunteers’ results. Results highlighted in grey are those out of the normal ranges (Table 1).Table 1:Results of the 8 patients with inherited platelet disorders.PatientsPlatelet count (109/L)WBI RH (AU) [>500]WBI RL (AU) [<150]WBI ADP (AU) [>550]WBI Coll (AU) [>500]GT 116923441443GT 224955417ND7BSS 134371119129BSS 230254733582GPS7916217ND42PTVWD22099493ND338PTVWD231116560ND1092PTVWD2341174168ND852All patients except those with PTVWD had decreased results with WBI. However, as expected, patients with GT had flat traces using WBI ADP and WBI Coll but normal or only decreased curves (234 – 554 AU) using WBI RH. On the opposite, BSS patients had flat traces using WBI RH but detectable curves using WBI ADP (191 – 335 AU) despite decreased platelet count. The thrombocytopenic GPS patient has a flat trace using WBI Coll and decreased WBI RH (162 AU). Members of the PTVWD family had normal results except a slightly increased result with WBI RH in 1/3 patients. Finally, LTA results performed in 6/8 patients were all in accordance with those of the WBI. In conclusion, in 8 patients with well characterized inherited platelet disorders, WBI was able to detect all abnormalities except PTVWD. In such cases, different ristocetin concentrations use might be critical to increase sensitivity. In our hands, WBI was able to discriminate disorders involving platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa from GP Ib-IX-V: GT patients exhibited flat traces using WBI ADP and WBI Coll, whereas patients with BSS exhibited flat traces with ristocetin. These preliminary results need to be confirmed on a larger population of patients with various characterized platelet function disorders. They suggest that WBI using the Multiplate® analyzer, which is a fast, easy and blood-preserving test, could be a valuable extra step before or in addition to the classic LTA for the diagnosis of severe inherited platelet disorders. Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.