Multiple Dynein Research Articles

Building Complexity: An In Vitro Study of Cytoplasmic Dynein with In Vivo Implications

Cytoplasmic dynein is the molecular motor responsible for most retrograde microtubule-based vesicular transport. In vitro single-molecule experiments suggest that dynein function is not as robust as that of kinesin-1 or myosin-V because dynein moves only a limited distance (approximately 800 nm) before detaching and can exert a modest (approximately 1 pN) force. However, dynein-driven cargos in vivo move robustly over many microns and exert forces of multiple pN. To determine how to go from limited single-molecule function to robust in vivo transport, we began to build complexity in a controlled manner by using in vitro experiments. We show that a single cytoplasmic dynein motor frequently transitions into an off-pathway unproductive state that impairs net transport. Addition of a second (and/or third) dynein motor, so that cargos are moved by two (or three) motors rather than one, is sufficient to recover several properties of in vivo motion; such properties include long cargo travels, robust motion, and increased forces. Part of this improvement appears to arise from selective suppression of the unproductive state of dynein rather than from a fundamental change in dynein's mechanochemical cycle. Multiple dyneins working together suppress shortcomings of a single motor and generate robust motion under in vitro conditions. There appears to be no need for additional cofactors (e.g., dynactin) for this improvement. Because cargos are often driven by multiple dyneins in vivo, our results show that changing the number of dynein motors could allow modulation of dynein function from the mediocre single-dynein limit to robust in vivo-like dynein-driven motion.

Dynein Motility: Four Heads Are Better Than Two

Cytoplasmic dynein is a microtubule-based motor protein that transports membranes in cells. The movement driven by a single dynein molecule in vitro is not as robust as dynein-driven movements in cells. A new study suggests that transport by multiple dyneins is more similar to cellular motions.

Kinesin and Dynein Move a Peroxisome in Vivo: A Tug-of-War or Coordinated Movement?

We used fluorescence imaging with one nanometer accuracy (FIONA) to analyze organelle movement by conventional kinesin and cytoplasmic dynein in a cell. We located a green fluorescence protein (GFP)-tagged peroxisome in cultured Drosophila S2 cells to within 1.5 nanometers in 1.1 milliseconds, a 400-fold improvement in temporal resolution, sufficient to determine the average step size to be approximately 8 nanometers for both dynein and kinesin. Furthermore, we found that dynein and kinesin do not work against each other in vivo during peroxisome transport. Rather, multiple kinesins or multiple dyneins work together, producing up to 10 times the in vitro speed.

Molecular Motors: Strategies to Get Along

The majority of active transport in the cell is driven by three classes of molecular motors: the kinesin and dynein families that move toward the plus-end and minus-end of microtubules, respectively, and the unconventional myosin motors that move along actin filaments. Each class of motor has different properties, but in the cell they often function together. In this review we summarize what is known about their single-molecule properties and the possibilities for regulation of such properties. In view of new results on cytoplasmic dynein, we attempt to rationalize how these different classes of motors might work together as part of the intracellular transport machinery. We propose that kinesin and myosin are robust and highly efficient transporters, but with somewhat limited room for regulation of function. Because cytoplasmic dynein is less efficient and robust, to achieve function comparable to the other motors it requires a number of accessory proteins as well as multiple dyneins functioning together. This necessity for additional factors, as well as dynein's inherent complexity, in principle allows for greatly increased control of function by taking the factors away either singly or in combination. Thus, dynein's contribution relative to the other motors can be dynamically tuned, allowing the motors to function together differently in a variety of situations.

The Dynein Heavy Chain Family1

Dynein is the large molecular motor that translocates to the (-) ends of microtubules. Dynein was first isolated from Tetrahymena cilia four decades ago. The analysis of the primary structure of the dynein heavy chain and the discovery that many organisms express multiple dynein heavy chains have led to two insights. One, dynein, whose motor domain comprises six AAA modules and two potential mechanical levers, generates movement by a mechanism that is fundamentally different than that which underlies the motion of myosin and kinesin. And two, organisms with cilia or flagella express approximately 14 different dynein heavy chain genes, each gene encodes a distinct dynein protein isoform, and each isoform appears to be functionally specialized. Sequence comparisons demonstrate that functionally equivalent isoforms of dynein heavy chains are well conserved across species. Alignments of portions of the motor domain result in seven clusters: (i) cytoplasmic dynein Dyhl; (ii) cytoplasmic dynein Dyh2; (iii) axonemal outer arm dynein alpha; (iv) outer arm dyneins beta and gamma; (v) inner arm dynein 1alpha; (vi) inner arm dynein 1beta; and (vii) a group of apparently single-headed inner arm dyneins. Some of the dynein groups contained more than one representative from a single organism, suggesting that these may be tissue-specific variants.

Identification of a novel light intermediate chain (D2LIC) for mammalian cytoplasmic dynein 2.

The diversity of dynein's functions in mammalian cells is a manifestation of both the existence of multiple dynein heavy chain isoforms and an extensive set of associated protein subunits. In this study, we have identified and characterized a novel subunit of the mammalian cytoplasmic dynein 2 complex. The sequence similarity between this 33-kDa subunit and the light intermediate chains (LICs) of cytoplasmic dynein 1 suggests that this protein is a dynein 2 LIC (D2LIC). D2LIC contains a P-loop motif near its NH(2) terminus, and it shares a short region of similarity to the yeast GTPases Spg1p and Tem1p. The D2LIC subunit interacts specifically with DHC2 (or cDhc1b) in both reciprocal immunoprecipitations and sedimentation assays. The expression of D2LIC also mirrors that of DHC2 in a variety of tissues. D2LIC colocalizes with DHC2 at the Golgi apparatus throughout the cell cycle. On brefeldin A-induced Golgi fragmentation, a fraction of D2LIC redistributes to the cytoplasm, leaving behind a subset of D2LIC that is localized around the centrosome. Our results suggest that D2LIC is a bona fide subunit of cytoplasmic dynein 2 that may play a role in maintaining Golgi organization by binding cytoplasmic dynein 2 to its Golgi-associated cargo.

The dynein heavy chain gene family in Tetrahymena thermophila.

The dynein ATPases are a family of motor enzymes that drive microtubule sliding in cilia and flagella and contribute to microtubule-based transport inside cells. The multi-dynein hypothesis makes two predictions: 1) Axonemes contain multiple dynein heavy chain (DHC) isoforms, each encoded by a different gene; 2) Each isoform performs a specific role in ciliary beating. We used PCR-based techniques to clone thirteen different DHC sequences from Tetrahymena genomic DNA. All thirteen genes appeared to be expressed in growing cells. Comparisons of the deduced amino acid sequences of the thirteen DHCs with other known DHCs suggested that we have cloned three outer arm DHCs, two cytoplasmic DHCs, and eight inner arm DHCs.

Domains in the 1alpha dynein heavy chain required for inner arm assembly and flagellar motility in Chlamydomonas.

Flagellar motility is generated by the activity of multiple dynein motors, but the specific role of each dynein heavy chain (Dhc) is largely unknown, and the mechanism by which the different Dhcs are targeted to their unique locations is also poorly understood. We report here the complete nucleotide sequence of the Chlamydomonas Dhc1 gene and the corresponding deduced amino acid sequence of the 1alpha Dhc of the I1 inner dynein arm. The 1alpha Dhc is similar to other axonemal Dhcs, but two additional phosphate binding motifs (P-loops) have been identified in the NH(2)- and COOH-terminal regions. Because mutations in Dhc1 result in motility defects and loss of the I1 inner arm, a series of Dhc1 transgenes were used to rescue the mutant phenotypes. Motile cotransformants that express either full-length or truncated 1alpha Dhcs were recovered. The truncated 1alpha Dhc fragments lacked the dynein motor domain, but still assembled with the 1beta Dhc and other I1 subunits into partially functional complexes at the correct axoneme location. Analysis of the transformants has identified the site of the 1alpha motor domain in the I1 structure and further revealed the role of the 1alpha Dhc in flagellar motility and phototactic behavior.

Gene knockouts reveal separate functions for two cytoplasmic dyneins in Tetrahymena thermophila.

In many organisms, there are multiple isoforms of cytoplasmic dynein heavy chains, and division of labor among the isoforms would provide a mechanism to regulate dynein function. The targeted disruption of somatic genes in Tetrahymena thermophila presents the opportunity to determine the contributions of individual dynein isoforms in a single cell that expresses multiple dynein heavy chain genes. Substantial portions of two Tetrahymena cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain genes were cloned, and their motor domains were sequenced. Tetrahymena DYH1 encodes the ubiquitous cytoplasmic dynein Dyh1, and DYH2 encodes a second cytoplasmic dynein isoform, Dyh2. The disruption of DYH1, but not DYH2, resulted in cells with two detectable defects: 1) phagocytic activity was inhibited, and 2) the cells failed to distribute their chromosomes correctly during micronuclear mitosis. In contrast, the disruption of DYH2 resulted in a loss of regulation of cell size and cell shape and in the apparent inability of the cells to repair their cortical cytoskeletons. We conclude that the two dyneins perform separate tasks in Tetrahymena.

Evidence for four cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain isoforms in rat testis.

Recent studies have revealed the expression of multiple putative cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain (DHC) genes in several organisms, with each gene encoding a separate protein isoform. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that different isoforms do different things, as is the case for the axonemal dyneins. Furthermore, the large number of tasks ascribed to cytoplasmic dynein suggests that there may be additional isoforms not yet identified. Two of the mammalian cytoplasmic dynein heavy chains are DHC1a and DHC1b. DHC1a is conventional cytoplasmic dynein and is found in all organisms examined. DHC1b is expressed in organisms that have multiple dyneins, and has been implicated in the intracellular trafficking of molecules in unciliated and ciliated cells. In the present study, we examined the DHC1b protein from rat testis. Testis cytoplasmic dynein contains a large amount of dynein heavy chain reactive with an antibody raised against a peptide sequence of rat DHC1b. The testis anti-DHC1b immunoreactive protein is slightly smaller than testis DHC1a, as assessed by SDS-PAGE. In Northern blots, the DHC1b mRNA is smaller than the DHC1a mRNA. In sucrose gradients made in low ionic strength, DHC1a sedimented at approximately 20S, and the anti-1b immunoreactive heavy chains sedimented in a broad band centered at approximately 14S. The V1-photolysis reaction of individual sucrose gradient fractions revealed three distinct patterns of photolysis, suggesting that there are at least three separate 1b-like heavy chain isoforms in testis. Using a high-stringency Western blotting protocol, the anti-1b antibody and the anti-DHC2 antibody recognized the same heavy chain and specifically bound to one of the three 1b-like heavy chains. We conclude that rat testis contains three 1b-like dynein heavy chains, and one of these is the product of the DHC1b/DHC2 gene previously identified.

Molecular and Structural Studies on Dynein Associated Mutations inChlamydomonas Flagella.

The dynein ATPases are a large family of motor enzymes that provide the driving force for flagellar motility and contribute to microtubule-based transport inside cells. The challenge for the field is to appreciate the functional significance of the multiple dynein motors, to determine how the cell assembles a motor complex and targets each motor to its appropriate location, and to understand how a cell regulates the activity of each motor to accomplish its specific task(s). In our laboratory, we have capitalized on the highly ordered structural organization of the flagellar axoneme and on the ease of genetic analysis inChlamydomonasto ask how a single cell controls the assembly and activity of its multiple flagellar dyneins. In particular, we have focused our efforts on the inner dynein arms, which are both necessary and sufficient for normal flagellar motility. The significance of this work derives from the conservation of axoneme structure across species, as well as the numerous functional homologies between the flagellar and cytoplasmic dyneins.

Induction of temporary beating in paralyzed flagella of Chlamydomonas mutants by application of external force.

To help understand the mechanism by which the sliding movement of outer-doublet microtubules in cilia and flagella is converted into bending waves, we examined the effect of mechanical force imposed on the flagella of Chlamydomonas mutants lacking the central pair or multiple dyneins. These mutants were almost completely nonmotile under normal conditions. A bend was produced in a flagellum either by holding a cell with a micropipette and quickly moving it with a piezoelectric actuator; or by pushing a flagellum with a microneedle. After removal of the external force, mutants lacking the central pair (pf18 and pf19) displayed beating at irregular intervals of > 1 second for one to several cycles. Similarly, a double mutant (ida2ida4) lacking four species of inner-arm dynein displayed beating at intervals of > 0.1 second for up to 80 cycles. However, paralyzed flagella of double mutants that lack the outer dynein arm in addition to the central pair or the inner dynein arm did not show cyclical movements upon application of external force. These results indicate that the central pair and the inner dynein arm are important for both stable bend formation at the base and efficient bend propagation along the flagellar length. They also suggest that the outer dynein arm, and not the inner dynein arm, enables the flagellar axoneme to propagate bends independently of the central pair. We propose that the axoneme is equipped with two independent motor systems for oscillatory movements: an outer-arm system controlled by the axonemal mechanical state independently of the central pair/radial spoke system, and an inner-arm system controlled by both the axonemal mechanical state and the central pair/radial spokes.

The role of central apparatus components in flagellar motility and microtubule assembly

In order to generate the complex waveforms typical of beating cilia and flagella, the action of the dynein arms must be regulated. This regulation not only depends on the presence of multiple dynein isoforms, but also clearly involves other structures in the axoneme such as the radial spokes and central apparatus; mutants lacking these structures have paralyzed flagella. In this article, we review recent progress in identifying protein components of the central apparatus and discuss the role of these components in regulation of flagellar motility and central apparatus assembly. The central apparatus is composed of two single microtubules and their associated structures which include the central pair projections, the central pair bridges linking the two tubules, and the central pair caps which are attached to the distal or plus ends of the microtubules. To date, the genes encoding four components of the central apparatus have been cloned, PF15, PF16, PF20 and KLP1. PF16, PF20 and KLP1 have been sequenced and their gene products localized. Two additional components have been identified immunologically, a 110 kD polypeptide recognized by an antibody generated against highly conserved kinesin peptide sequence, and a 97 kD polypeptide recognized by CREST antisera. Based on a variety of data, one model that has emerged to explain the role of the central apparatus in flagellar motility is that the central apparatus ultimately regulates dynein through interactions with the radial spokes. The challenge now is to determine the precise mechanism by which the polypeptides comprising the central apparatus and the radial spokes interact to transduce a regulatory signal to the dynein arms. In terms of assembly, the central apparatus microtubules assemble with their plus ends distal to the cell body but, unlike the nine doublet microtubules, they are not nucleated from the basal bodies. Since some central apparatus defective mutants fail to assemble the entire central apparatus, their gene products may eventually prove to have microtubule nucleating or stabilizing properties. By continuing to identify the genes that encode central apparatus components, we will begin to understand the contribution of these microtubules to flagellar motility and gain insight into their nucleation, assembly, and stability. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 38:1–8, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The role of central apparatus components in flagellar motility and microtubule assembly.

In order to generate the complex waveforms typical of beating cilia and flagella, the action of the dynein arms must be regulated. This regulation not only depends on the presence of multiple dynein isoforms, but also clearly involves other structures in the axoneme such as the radial spokes and central apparatus; mutants lacking these structures have paralyzed flagella. In this article, we review recent progress in identifying protein components of the central apparatus and discuss the role of these components in regulation of flagellar motility and central apparatus assembly. The central apparatus is composed of two single microtubules and their associated structures which include the central pair projections, the central pair bridges linking the two tubules, and the central pair caps which are attached to the distal or plus ends of the microtubules. To date, the genes encoding four components of the central apparatus have been cloned, PF15, PF16, PF20 and KLP1. PF16, PF20 and KLP1 have been sequenced and their gene products localized. Two additional components have been identified immunologically, a 110 kD polypeptide recognized by an antibody generated against highly conserved kinesin peptide sequence, and a 97 kD polypeptide recognized by CREST antisera. Based on a variety of data, one model that has emerged to explain the role of the central apparatus in flagellar motility is that the central apparatus ultimately regulates dynein through interactions with the radial spokes. The challenge now is to determine the precise mechanism by which the polypeptides comprising the central apparatus and the radial spokes interact to transduce a regulatory signal to the dynein arms. In terms of assembly, the central apparatus microtubules assemble with their plus ends distal to the cell body but, unlike the nine doublet microtubules, they are not nucleated from the basal bodies. Since some central apparatus defective mutants fail to assemble the entire central apparatus, their gene products may eventually prove to have microtubule nucleating or stabilizing properties. By continuing to identify the genes that encode central apparatus components, we will begin to understand the contribution of these microtubules to flagellar motility and gain insight into their nucleation, assembly, and stability.

Chapter 15 Electrophoretic Separation of Dynein Heavy Chains

Publisher Summary Molecular studies of axonemal dyneins have demonstrated that each outer and inner dynein arm contains at least two multiple dynein heavy chains (DHCs) and that inner dynein arms may be composed of different heavy chains along the length of the axoneme. It is probable that each kind of motile axoneme contains multiple DHCs. All DHCs characterized until now cannot be resolved by two-dimensional poly-acrylamide gel electrophoresis and are resolved by one-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis only under specific conditions. The electrophoretic procedure presented in this chapter is a modified version of the procedure of Neville. It can be applied to resolve at least some of the DHCs present in cilia or eukaryotic flagella. It was developed to obtain optimal resolution of the 9 or 11 DHCs that are assembled in the axoneme of Chlamydomonas flagella. The procedure is capable of resolving six bands, each comprising one or two or three of the DHCs. Although changes in the composition of the gel or buffers used for the electrophoresis cause changes in the electrophoretic patterns formed by the DHCs, all DHCs cannot be separated by gel electrophoresis alone because they are so similar in structure and present in the axonemes at different concentrations. Complete separation of DHC subsets can be achieved through gel electrophoresis if the number of DHCs under analysis is reduced by mutation or chromatographic fractionation. The chapter discusses the chemicals involved, the solutions, and the apparatus needed. Nine stock solutions are prepared and kept at room temperature. The electrophoresis is performed in a homemade, vertical apparatus that holds 35.5-cm-wide, 26.5-cm-long, and 0.4-cm-thick glass plates. Thinner glass plates are not adequate for optimal resolution of dynein heavy chains because they are flexible and do not provide a gel slab that has homogeneous thickness. Polymerizations are performed at room temperatures.

A cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain in sea urchin embryos

By making the hypothetis that the pattern of conserved sequence residues in the vicinity of the hydrolytic ATP-binding site of dynein would resemble that in myosins from a broad variety of sources, we designed degenerate oligonucleotide primers capable of amplifying this region of multiple dynein isoforms from sea urchin embryo poly(A) + RNA. Quantification of the expression of two of these dynein isoforms has shown that the level of mRNA encoding for the β-heavy chain, like that of tubulin, increases 2–3-fold after deciliation of the embryos, whereas the expression of the second dynein isoforms, like that of actin, is essentially unaffected. This second isoform is believed to be the cytoplasmic dynein of sea urchin embryos.

Kinetic evidence for multiple dynein heads: modeling the dissociation reaction.

Kinetic evidence for multiple dynein heads: modeling the dissociation reaction.