Multiple Criteria Analysis Methods Research Articles

A multiple criteria decision support web-based system for facilities management

An analysis of multiple criteria decision support systems and facilities management web-based automation applications that were developed by researchers from various countries assisted the authors to create their own Multiple Criteria Decision Support Web-Based System for Facilities Management (DSS-FM). DSS-FM differs from others in its use of new multiple criteria analysis methods as were developed by the authors. The database of a facilities management was developed and provides a comprehensive assessment of alternative versions from the economic, technical, technological, infrastructure, qualitative, technological, legislative and other perspectives. Based on the above complex databases, the developed Multiple Criteria Decision Support Web-Based System for Facilities Management enables the user to analyse alternatives quantitatively and conceptually (i.e. the text, formula, schemes, etc.). Applying the DSS-FM may increase the efficiency of calculators, analysers, software, neural networks, expert and decision support systems and e-commerce.

THE APPLICATION OF MULTI-CRITERION METHODS FOR VALUATION OF RECREATION PROPERTY/DIE ANWENDUNG DER MEHRKRITERIELLEN METHODE BEI DER BEWERTUNG VON ERHOLUNGSGRUNDSTÜCKEN

Multi-criterion valuation methods are widely used in real estate valuation all over the world. In USA, UK and other countries these methods are part of techniques based on comparative and reinstatement values as well as on income use [1]. A number of problems in the valuation of real property can be eliminated by the methods of multiple criteria analysis, which came into existence only at the second half of the 20th century. Currently, they have become very important in the international practice of the real property valuation. In most cases they are based on market modelling and economic assumptions. Therefore, sometimes they are referred to as separate valuation methods, and classified as modern ones. This article describes a new method of multiple criteria analysis. This method based on the market analysis and valuation principle is in line with the traditional comparative value method, therefore it can be attributed to the group of the indirect comparative value methods. These methods facilitate the universal and more extensive multiple criteria analysis of the property, since they take account of a number of different criteria, ie qualitative, quantitative ones, market conditions. The proposed method can meet the demands and needs of many interested groups since it enables to estimate not only the market value of the property, but also other values, eg investment value, value of use, market value of the current use of the property, etc. This article analyses the theoretical model of the method, which was used to estimate the market value of the recreation premises.

THE APPLICATION OF MULTI-CRITERION METHODS FOR VALUATION OF RECREATION PROPERTY

Summary Multi-criterion valuation methods are widely used in real estate valuation all over the world. In USA, UK and other countries these methods are part of techniques based on comparative and reinstatement values as well as on income use [1]. A number of problems in the valuation of real property can be eliminated by the methods of multiple criteria analysis, which came into existence only at the second half of the 20th century. Currently, they have become very important in the international practice of the real property valuation. In most cases they are based on market modelling and economic assumptions. Therefore, sometimes they are referred to as separate valuation methods, and classified as modern ones. This article describes a new method of multiple criteria analysis. This method based on the market analysis and valuation principle is in line with the traditional comparative value method, therefore it can be attributed to the group of the indirect comparative value methods. These methods facilita...

Development of a methodology for selecting criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management: a case study on participatory assessment.

This paper describes an application of multiple criteria analysis (MCA) in assessing criteria and indicators adapted for a particular forest management unit. The methods include: ranking, rating, and pairwise comparisons. These methods were used in a participatory decision-making environment where a team representing various stakeholders and professionals used their expert opinions and judgements in assessing different criteria and indicators (C&I) on the one hand, and how suitable and applicable they are to a forest management unit on the other. A forest concession located in Kalimantan, Indonesia, was used as the site for the case study. Results from the study show that the multicriteria methods are effective tools that can be used as structured decision aids to evaluate, prioritize, and select sets of C&I for a particular forest management unit. Ranking and rating approaches can be used as a screening tool to develop an initial list of C&I. Pairwise comparison, on the other hand, can be used as a finer filter to further reduce the list. In addition to using these three MCA methods, the study also examines two commonly used group decision-making techniques, the Delphi method and the nominal group technique. Feedback received from the participants indicates that the methods are transparent, easy to implement, and provide a convenient environment for participatory decision-making.

MULTIPLE CRITERIA MULTIVARIANT DESIGN OF A BUILDING LIFE CYCLE/PASTATO GYVAVIMO PROCESO DAUGIAKRITERINIS ALTERNATYVUSIS PROJEKTAVIMAS

MULTIPLE CRITERIA MULTIVARIANT DESIGN OF A BUILDING LIFE CYCLE/PASTATO GYVAVIMO PROCESO DAUGIAKRITERINIS ALTERNATYVUSIS PROJEKTAVIMAS

MULTIPLE CRITERIA MULTIVARIANT DESIGN OF A BUILDING LIFE CYCLE

Summary A lot of data had to be processed and evaluated when carrying out multivariant design of a building life cycle. The number of feasible alternatives can be as large as 100,000. Each of the alternatives may be described from various perspectives, eg by conceptual and quantitative information. The problem arises how to perform computer-aided design of the alternative variants based on this enormous amount of information. To solve this problem a new method of multiple criteria multivariant building life cycle design was developed. According to the above method multiple criteria multivariant design is carried out in 5 stages (Fig 1). In order to reduce the amount of information being used in computer-aided multivariant design the codes of the alternative solutions are used. In this case, any i solution of j alternative is given a ij code providing thorough quantitative (system of criteria, units of measure, significances, values, as well as a minimizing or maximizing criterion) and conceptual (text, dr...