Multiple Complex Developmental Disorder Research Articles

Multiple Complex Developmental Disorder: The “Multiple and Complex” Evolution of the “Childhood Borderline Syndrome” Construct

To provide an overview of the history, evolution, and nosology of the diagnostic constructs for "borderline syndrome of childhood," also known as "multiple complex developmental disorder." The authors synthesized information found via electronic searches of databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Current Contents, Humanities Abstracts, and Social Sciences Abstracts) and bibliographic directed searches. Although early publications (prior to 1980) were either highly anecdotal or lacking in scientific rigor, they were nonetheless noted for their historic value and influence on research trends. The recent publications (1990s) were characterized by more rigorous methodology and greater generalizability. Current classifications, proposals for diagnostic criteria, epidemiological data, and nosological suggestions were summarized. The literature supports the creation of a new diagnostic label to describe a population of children whose symptoms are currently subsumed under the labels "borderline" or "multiple complex developmental disorder." A full characterization of the syndrome, including its evolution, would require prospective studies and may differ from the known evolution for personality disorders and/or pervasive developmental disorders. The authors propose a process by which a new nomenclature is derived.

The differential diagnosis of impaired reciprocal social interaction in children: a review of disorders.

Impairment in reciprocal social interaction in children that is less severe than autism can be difficult to diagnose due to the variety of developmental pathways that may lead to this problem. Seven childhood disorders are reviewed that include impaired reciprocal interaction: multisystem developmental disorder, nonverbal learning disability syndrome, semantic-pragmatic disorder, attachment disorders (including a developmental theory of limbic system damage), multiplex developmental disorder, schizoid personality disorder, and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified. Clarification is needed for most of the disorders in the areas of operationalized criteria, assessment tools, and documenting causal relationships.

Unresponsiveness to psychosocial stress in a subgroup of autistic-like children, multiple complex developmental disorder.

In this study, we tried to replicate the finding of a diminished cortisol response to stress in autistic-like patients in a more homogenous Multiple Complex Developmental Disorder (MCDD) group. MCDD forms a distinct group within the autistic-like disorders, characterized by impaired regulation of anxiety and affective state, impaired social behavior/sensitivity, and thought disorder. A number of MCDD children develop schizophrenia in adult life. Responses to a psychosocial stressor, consisting of speaking in public while recorded on video, were measured in 10 MCDD children and 12 healthy control children. The public speaking test was imbedded in a two-hour test session, and compared to a control test session. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) responses were measured on salivary cortisol at about 20-minute intervals. Heart rate was measured continuously. Delta AUC's were computed for both heart rate (dAUCHR) and salivary cortisol (dAUCCORT), as a measure of response to the test.The public speaking task resulted in significant responses in heart rate and salivary cortisol in healthy control children, but not in MCDD children. dAUCHR was 3.28+/-2.37 in healthy control children, but -0.09+/-1.73 in MCDD children (t=3.31, P<0.01). dAUCCORT was 3.22+/-3.16 in healthy control children, but 0. 17+/-1.74 in MCDD children (t=2.72, P<0.05).The impaired responses to psychosocial stress found in MCDD children may be the result of their limited abilities to react adequately to their (social) environment. The same impairment in stress processing has been found in schizophrenia, and might be a factor in the vulnerability of these MCDD children to develop schizophrenia.

Inpatient Treatment of Severe Disruptive Behaviour Disorders with Risperidone and Milieu Therapy

To evaluate the therapeutic impact of adding risperidone to milieu therapy of latency-aged inpatients with severe disruptive disorders. The charts of 90 latency-aged patients consecutively admitted to a psychiatry ward were reviewed retrospectively. Fifteen of these patients received risperidone treatment, were nonpsychotic, and did not suffer from pervasive developmental disorder (12 male, 3 female; mean age 9.99 years, SD 1.76). Their scores on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) were compared at admission, before risperidone treatment, and at discharge. All subjects were diagnosed with a disruptive behavioural disorder. Ten (66.67%) had additional learning difficulties, and 13 (86.7%) had pathological personality traits. The characteristics of the sample suggested borderline pathology or multiple complex developmental disorder. Following a mean of 38 days after admission (SD 22.3), the patients received risperidone for a mean of 46 days (SD 28.2) before being discharged. The mean maintenance dose of risperidone was 1.27 mg daily (SD 0.36). Mean CGAS scores increased from admission (21.9, SD 7.0) to before risperidone treatment (26.8, SD 7.6, P < 0.0001) and to discharge (50.3, SD 5.3, P < 0.0001). Only 2 patients had documented side effects. Low-dose risperidone used adjunctively to milieu therapy led to statistically and clinically significant additional improvement in the functioning of hospitalized latency-aged children with severe behavioural disorders. Low-dose risperidone is a safe and effective adjunct to milieu therapy for treating this population in inpatient settings. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

ERP differences among subtypes of pervasive developmental disorders

Background: Children with multiple complex developmental disorder (MCDD) have been distinguished from autistic children on the basis of chart reviews. It was questioned whether it is possible to find other, e.g., event-related potential (ERP), evidence for this assertion. Methods: ERPs were measured in response to stimuli in a visual oddball task in autistic, MCDD, attention deficit disorder, dyslexic, and normal control children, to study whether ERP peaks can be used to distinguish autistic and MCDD children, and to classify the aforementioned groups. Results: It was found that the P3 at four different leads and the frontal Nc showed differences among the groups, and that the autistic and MCDD groups differed from each other as well as from the other groups. Also, it was found that, using discriminant analyses in which these parameters were included, children were classified above chance level. Especially in the MCDD group, a high percentage of correct classification was seen. Conclusions: ERP parameters indicate that autistic and MCDD children might differ in underlying pathology and might therefore, better be regarded as two separate diagnostic entities.

Multiplex Developmental Disorders: The Role of Communication in the Construction of a Self

This article discusses the integration of various aspects of the child's development, particularly the development of language and communication and the way in which these developments interact to enable the child to construct a coherent sense of self. Multiplex developmental disorder is presented as an example of a disorder that affects several of these crucial strands of development. Recent research and controversies regarding the diagnostic descriptions of multiplex and other pervasive developmental disorders are presented. This discussion is used to illustrate the ways in which such disorders affect not only the individual aspects of development, but the child's ability to form a cohesive sense of self. The implications of these difficulties in self-definition for treating children with disorders that affect a variety of aspects of development are also discussed.

Diagnostic Rules for Children with PDD‐NOS and Multiple Complex Developmental Disorder

This study was designed to examine the classification performance of diagnostic rules for pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS) and multiple complex developmental disorder (McDD), with clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. McDD is an heuristic concept of a developmental disorder characterised by social impairments, affective dysregulation, and thought disturbance. Detailed information on the symptoms, reliably extracted from the charts of 103 children with PDD-NOS and McDD, 32 with autistic disorder, and 96 with non-PDD disorders, was used to determine the presence of the DSM-IV criteria of autistic disorder and the criteria of McDD. A scoring rule for PDD-NOS based on a short set of seven DSM-IV criteria with a cut-off point of three items and one social interaction item set as mandatory had the best balance between high sensitivity and high specificity. The most effective and simple rule based on McDD criteria had a cut-off of three items, out of six items of anxieties and thought disturbance.

Diagnostic Rules for Children with PDD-NOS and Multiple Complex Developmental Disorder

This study was designed to examine the classification performance of diagnostic rules for pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS) and multiple complex developmental disorder (McDD), with clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. McDD is an heuristic concept of a developmental disorder characterised by social impairments, affective dysregulation, and thought disturbance. Detailed information on the symptoms, reliably extracted from the charts of 103 children with PDD-NOS and McDD, 32 with autistic disorder, and 96 with non-PDD disorders, was used to determine the presence of the DSM-IV criteria of autistic disorder and the criteria of McDD. A scoring rule for PDD-NOS based on a short set of seven DSM-IV criteria with a cut-off point of three items and one social interaction item set as mandatory had the best balance between high sensitivity and high specificity. The most effective and simple rule based on McDD criteria had a cut-off of three items, out of six items of anxieties and thought disturbance.

Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Indices of Auditory Processing Impairment in Children With Multiple Complex Developmental Disorder

To evaluate whether children with borderline disorder (also referred to as multiple complex developmental disorder) (BD/MCDD) and comorbid attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) demonstrate evidence of abnormal attention and/or auditory processing impairments as indexed by both behavioral and physiological measures. Three groups of children were compared in two different experiments on behavioral rating scales (Conners Parent Rating Scale and Child Behavior Checklist), behavioral accuracy to auditory and visual target detection tasks, selected neuropsychological tests, and brain physiology (event-related potentials) collected during auditory and visual target detection tasks. The results demonstrate that children with BD/MCDD differ from children with ADHD in the (1) prevalence of internalizing and externalizing behaviors, (2) neuropsychological deficits related to auditory processing, and (3) event-related potential brain physiology associated with auditory cognitive target attention tasks. Some of the pervasive pathology described in children with BD/MCDD may be due to biological vulnerabilities, particularly problems with auditory processing. Auditory processing impairments in such children deserves special attention with respect to both understanding their behavioral symptoms and developing a comprehensive treatment plan.

A Controlled Multivariate Chart Review of Multiple Complex Developmental Disorder

The primary aim of the study was to ascertain the usefulness and the validity of the set of criteria proposed to define a subgroup within the DSM-III-R category of pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified under the name of multiple complex developmental disorder (MCDD). A multivariate analysis (cluster and principal-components analysis) was performed on the characteristics, reliably extracted from the charts of 105 children with MCDD, 32 with autistic disorder, 51 with externalizing disorders, and 56 with internalizing disorders, all with an IQ greater than 70, fully assessed in our department between 1984 and 1991. The main finding was a strong correspondence between the classification of the cases by DSM-III-R categories and the subdivision by means of a multivariate cluster analysis. The cluster analysis did not discriminate between children with emotional and disruptive disorders. Furthermore, children with MCDD and autistic disorder were significantly different both on symptom factors ("psychotic thinking/anxiety," "aggression," "deficient interaction/communication," "stereotyped and rigid behavior," and "suspiciousness/odd interaction") and on factors that reflected developmental and environmental background variables. The results of this study add to the nosology of autistic spectrum disorders and lend additional support to the need for a separate subcategory of MCDD within DSM-V. Further corroboration of these results in independent (multicenter) samples will be required.

Multiplex Developmental Disorder

Multiplex Developmental Disorder

Conceptualizing “Borderline Syndrome of Childhood” and “Childhood Schizophrenia” as a Developmental Disorder

This is the first attempt to define and validate criteria for an early onset, chronic syndrome of disturbances in affect modulation, social relatedness, and thinking. This study formulates and tests five hypotheses that follow from conceptualizing this syndrome as a developmental disorder. The advantages of viewing this syndrome as a developmental disorder are discussed and compared with alternative formulations such as childhood schizophrenia or borderline syndrome of childhood. An inpatient cohort (26 boys, 4 girls) was ascertained using specific, defined criteria. Using standardized measures on retrospective chart reviews, these subjects were compared with two different inpatient samples: one diagnosed with dysthymic disorder, the other with conduct disorder. The criteria readily distinguished between developmentally disordered children and comparison groups. Findings also supported the hypotheses in the predicted directions; index subjects had earlier onset of symptoms, poorer social and overall adjustment, longer hospitalizations, and poorer outcomes. Findings support the validity of this developmental concept for a multiple complex developmental disorder and give preliminary, "first-cut" validity to these specified criteria.